Hi,
Which is the fastest GPU governor to use on the stock Xperia Z2 kernel?
Regards,
B
Puffin617 said:
Hi,
Which is the fastest GPU governor to use on the stock Xperia Z2 kernel?
Regards,
B
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fastest for self explanitory reasons would be Performance
He's asking about "GPU" governor, not "CPU" governor.
V4LKyR said:
He's asking about "GPU" governor, not "CPU" governor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For GPU:
Performance
Powersave
Userspace
Cpu:
Interactive
Conservative
Ondemand
Userspace
Powesave
Performance
Related
As title says, what is the best setting to be chosen?kindly brief the detail coz im newbie
Sent from my SK17i using XDA
Well it depends on taste and kernel support but for me the best will be interactivex as governor and sio as I/o scheduler, it gives you no lags and good battery life.
i installed x kernel v4, did not have to change the cpu governor or i/o.
i only install nofrills to do benchmark, then removed it afterwards.
best battery life ever on hybrom v16
i think it uses ondemand for cpu, not sure wether it uses noop or deadline for i/o
i am currently testing smartassV2 cpu governor with simple i/o scheduler on krsh3 kernel
so far battery time is better with these settings than the default ondemand governor
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
what is the best GPU governor and I/O for S3 ?
and i use foxhound 1.4
thank you
Hi,
You mean CPU governor, right?
Pegasusq for the governor, optimized for quad core processors and for the I/O scheduler I would say Deadline or Noop.
You can read this about I/O shedulers: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22134559&postcount=4 or http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23885668&postcount=1
Ant it depends also of the kernel for the I/O scheduler, some kernels don't have all the I/O schedulers described above.
viking37 said:
Hi,
You mean CPU governor, right?
Pegasusq for the governor, optimized for quad core processors and for the I/O scheduler I would say Deadline or Noop.
You can read this about I/O shedulers: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22134559&postcount=4 or http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23885668&postcount=1
Ant it depends also of the kernel for the I/O scheduler, some kernels don't have all the I/O schedulers described above.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OH I mean CPU ^^
thank you
I am on the latest milestone 6 rom, and also the latest devil kernal. What is the clockspeed I should set it at, and also which governor works best?
Solidsnake726 said:
I am on the latest milestone 6 rom, and also the latest devil kernal. What is the clockspeed I should set it at, and also which governor works best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use 1200 MHz cpu speed, 105% liveoc, vr i/o scheduler and lulzactive governor. smooth and stable. though liveoc can be raised
reidandkat said:
I use 1200 MHz cpu speed, 105% liveoc, vr i/o scheduler and lulzactive governor. smooth and stable. though liveoc can be raised
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how about the battery performance ?
I heard that the best is Interactive but i'm using ondemand as it is set to default. What one do you use and why?
tehsprayer said:
I heard that the best is Interactive but i'm using ondemand as it is set to default. What one do you use and why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no "best" governor. It all depends on what the user is doing or going to do. If someone is gonna do benchmarking, they'll (most likely) set it to "performance" to test the device at its full capability. For saving battery, conservative or hot plug. For normal usage one may choose interactive, ondemand, smartass, lulzactive, lagfree, etc.
I've read that pegasusq should be aware of multi-core CPUs and should be able to deactivate not-needed cores.
But, on SGS2 a lot of people keeps using ondemand. Even CM keeps ondemand as default scheduler.
Is ondemand still better option as maybe it is better to run one core at 200MHz using ondemand then one core at 500MHz using pegasusq... ?
tnttrx said:
I've read that pegasusq should be aware of multi-core CPUs and should be able to deactivate not-needed cores.
But, on SGS2 a lot of people keeps using ondemand. Even CM keeps ondemand as default scheduler.
Is ondemand still better option as maybe it is better to run one core at 200MHz using ondemand then one core at 500MHz using pegasusq... ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This could be helpful.
Please search next time as I just typed "ondemand vs pegasusq" into the search bar.
kilometers4 said:
This could be helpful.
Please search next time as I just typed "ondemand vs pegasusq" into the search bar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx for pointing out, but in that thread I've just found things that I already mentioned: pegasusq is made for multi-cores and it has integrated hotplug.
unfortunately, I had no chance to find any real-world use comparison of pegasusq and ondemand (or other schedulers) regarding power consumption nor responsiveness.
tnttrx said:
thx for pointing out, but in that thread I've just found things that I already mentioned: pegasusq is made for multi-cores and it has integrated hotplug.
unfortunately, I had no chance to find any real-world use comparison of pegasusq and ondemand (or other schedulers) regarding power consumption nor responsiveness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pegasusq in my opinion is the better governor to use, largely because it can tell if is more than one core and respond accordingly. Pair that with CPU Sleeper Dual Core and you're golden as far as power saving awareness. SIO I hear is the best i/o scheduler to use for power consumption, deadline in my opinion is the best for pure performance however be careful because If you do overload and a process misses a deadline it will hiccup or even freeze.