Haven't seen any work done for jflteusc since they merged all jflte builds. Was wondering if the current nightlies for jfltevzw would work for jflteusc? Or if jfltexx would work either? Dying to get my hands on CM12!
There are some for usc.liquidsmooth.vanir.altares. gpe just to name a few
Related
I was wondering why some ROM developers use the earlier JSS15J build of AOSP while others use JWR66V...
For instance, I installed CM10.2 official nightlies, which are built on JSS and quickly tried to install build r176 of franco.kernel. Then I realized Franco's obligated to release TWO versions of his kernel because of this discrepancy.
Can anyone explain the main differences between the two builds?
Thanks!!
I saw today that the CM website has a nightly build of CM11 available for the Inc4g now. It's the first nightly build they have posted as far as I can tell. I don't know if it's different than the unofficial CM11 build posted on the development forum so I don't know if it requires any special recovery version like the unofficial build did. I'm also assuming it uses the same gapps version as the unofficial build does.
Just thought i'd mention it for anyone interested.
I know before Lolipop the Hltespr branch was stopped becasue CM had merged all the vairants into one CM rom fits all variants (HLTE)
But I noticed both the HLTESPR and HLTE have now equal amount of latest up to date nightles. Does anyone know if CM still has the merge all rom working properly for all devices. That being said is the expectation for an hltespr (sprint) user to stick with htlespr roms or would hlte be okay as well.
Basically which one should we use and which device thread is gonna get all the fancy new updates? HLTE or HLTESPR
? thanks
CollinsB said:
I know before Lolipop the Hltespr branch was stopped becasue CM had merged all the vairants into one CM rom fits all variants (HLTE)
But I noticed both the HLTESPR and HLTE have now equal amount of latest up to date nightles. Does anyone know if CM still has the merge all rom working properly for all devices. That being said is the expectation for an hltespr (sprint) user to stick with htlespr roms or would hlte be okay as well.
Basically which one should we use and which device thread is gonna get all the fancy new updates? HLTE or HLTESPR
? thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes stay with HLTESPR versions.
Happy flashing :highfive:
thanks will do
and im assuming CM will update us if that changes
Is there any active link for latest version of CyanogenMod11 for i9100? And i mean all nightlies and stable versions. CM site says its no longer supported, because of this fancy CM12 (works slow, so i want to downgrade)
I've looked everywhere.. Unless cm-11-20141115-SNAPSHOT-M12-i9100 is supposed to be fin.
e: [4.4.4]
You could try Lanchons builds from 09/15 from HERE(In CM-Lanchon folder). It is stock CM11 at the time of building. You can also get his trim kernels for CM11 there as well
Hey, I have put in a bit of work over the last couple of weekends and brought up AOKP 7.1 on the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (hlte). I would love to get the hlte up and official again. All of the necessary changes are on my github. My question is to the developers, how do I go about getting the code pushed up to the AOKP gerrit? I would push up change requests, but there is no nougat branch for the hlte trees. I have built using my changes, and everything builds properly, and in my testing everything seems to work as it should. The only changes I have made are the ones necessary to convert the LineageOS hlte trees to AOKP.
Specific tree links:
device_samsung_hlte
device_samsung_hlte-common