Slow CPU and Memory - Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.

Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CPU and Memory benchmarks depend on the ROM, the number of Apps you've installed, and a lot more factors. Also, this phone is 4.5 years old now, so what more do you expect out of it? Your phone is not dead. Go ahead and try out some custom ROMs, Kernels and MODs for your i9100.

Sandi1987 said:
In AnTuTu Benchmark i get worse score for CPU and Memory. Is it my Phone Died? I will never again buy used Phone. I have new Gigabyte GSmart Roma R2 (Plus Edition) with very fast CPU and Alcatel Pop C3 and both works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.

gsstudios said:
What's your antutu score? Anything above 12000 should be considered alright. I personally get around 15000 on antutu. Perhaps look more at the specs of the cpu and etc to confirm if product is gunuine or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.

@Sandi1987
Put your phone in a fridge for 1 hour . Clear recent apps menu and ram and run the test again. Tell us results.
And i'm not joking about 1 hour in fridge.
Wysłane ze Slim-fonika 9.0 powered by Apolo 7.3

In SuperPI i got normal Results (1M) and Games works normally.

Sandi1987 said:
12735 (Version 5.1). I tried PassMark PerformanceTest and Quadrant Standard Edition and i got lower Results on the same ROM. Something is wrong with CPU and Memory.
EDIT:
I got Score 13451 in version 5.7, but CPU and Memory Score are too bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU and memory scores affected by version of android (as well as runtime and etc). Usually stock won't give the best performance, but custom roms usually have more performance. Installing a custom kernel can also boost performance too.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same Android and AnTuTu version.
I have:
RAM: 970
CPU Integer: 1205
CPU Float-Point: 205
CPU Float-Point Score is so bad.

Why i have lower Scores then on Alcatel Pop C3 with 1300 MHz Dual Core in Benchmarking Software, but Games works normally like always? Android System works fast.
My CPU works only at Max. 800 MHz, not 1200 MHz. This is the reason why i get lower Scores. I Overclock CPU from 1200 MHz to 1400 MHz and it's works only at 800 MHz.
EDIT:
I found the problem. I have Enabled Energy Saver.

Related

[Q] Can we get higher overclocking frequencies?

Can our phone go higher than 864 mhz?because in the lg optimus gt540 there support for 900 mhz and 1000 mhz.
yoman321 said:
Can our phone go higher than 864 mhz?because in the lg optimus gt540 there support for 900 mhz and 1000 mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely. I think 2GHz is easily feasible if you plug the phone to 220V directly instead of using the wall charger!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1182804
Check out this rom for that phone
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@Dear MIA moderator, kindly lock this thread if a miracle ever happens and you appear.
I have read somewhere that higher frequencies can be faked as well. So some roms might be behaving like this.
On the other hand, I have read 1gh oced to 1.8gh. An 80% OC.
So, theoretically, our phone oc can be stretched to 600*1.8= 1080mh.
Depends on many other factors as well, which, I don't know.
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Its not faked here's the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSbCIvp5fzA
yoman321 said:
Its not faked here's the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSbCIvp5fzA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've so many posts complaining about kernel panics for anything more than 748 MHz(even 710 in some cases). If the phone doesn't support it, accept the fact and move on. This is not a super phone and has its limitations. So practically, it does not make sense to do something the phone is not capable of, unless you want to have your device getting bricked forever.
yoman321 said:
Its not faked here's the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSbCIvp5fzA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Listen, yup optimus gt540 can achieve to 900 mhz wit a same processor BUT ours are in a different hardware... Like gt540 has a imageon aderno 200 gpu series like optimus one is on qualcomm aderno 200 series..
Sent from LGE Secret phone using tapatalk app...
yoman321 said:
Its not faked here's the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSbCIvp5fzA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come back after you have found a P500 phone that is stable at at least 864MHz. Good luck. After you have tested couple hundreds of phones with no success, perhaps you will go find yourself another ricer project.
Can't even see the practical purpose of getting our cpu at these high freqs.
This phone has a limited hardware capabilities compared to high end devices. Everything that this phone can handle, can do it pretty well with frequencies way less than 800mhz (combined with a nice kernel/rom setup ofc).
Personally i'm one of the few ones with a phone stable at 864 mhz. But for anything except gaming emulators or mkv movies decoding there is no real uses in what i do to maintain it at that speed. The changing of screens on the launcher is also a little bit faster at 864 and thats it. For 150$ and wifi tethering its still amazing.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

Is My Note II Defective?

This is gonna be a pretty long story with photo's. I want to show you my situation as accurate as possible, so if someone can help me with this, that'll be amazing.
Has anyone here been noticing their phone lagging?
Swipe to unlock used to have fluid animations, not anymore. It hardly recognizes my gesture to unlock the device, I have to do it a few times.
Swiping through pages there are lag. Scrolling through App Drawer there is lag, especially in the Widgets section.
This phone has 4 cores and Project Butter, I don't get it. I'm thinking it could be from my SD card? Since it's only 16gb, and a class 4, it's taking longer for the phone to read the information on it? I think some of the apps I have are saved on the card (not sure how, but I think it is).
Anyway, if it's not from the SD card, do you guys have any idea why it would just be lagging like this? Are any of you guys experiencing performance hiccups?
I know I shouldn't be acting this way, but the phones less then a month old, and it should be smoother and faster..
I had 3 different launchers on my phone: Nova, Apex, Go, and I uninstalled all of them. Prior to uninstalling them, I never really set either one of them up, so there were no widgets on any of the launchers on the homescreen.
Here are a bunch of screen shots of the apps that I had on my phone, and how my phone was behaving..
Here are the apps that I have downloaded:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here is my Device storage, and I don't understand why I have OVER 5GB of Miscellaneous stuff..
Here are all the apps that are running in the background, some have been running for over 400 hours!
And from all of those apps that are running, I disabled most of them, based on this list [http://forums.androidcentral.com/verizon-galaxy-s-iii/202816-safe-disbable.html] of Apps that are safe to disable:
I ran a test on Quadrant Standard and my phones getting 37-41 fps in the 2d and 3d rendering. My total score was at 4239, much lower then the HTC One X.
I was at the Verizon store today...
Two Words: Factory Reset.
Man, such a big difference in performance! I think one of the apps that I had installed was causing the lag, I just gotta figure out which one.
After I did the factory reset at Verizon, I did the Quadrant Standard Benchmark, I scored 54xx, and then I scored 62xx with an fps of 55-63, and I got real happy. Fast forward 3 hours and I do the same benchmark, and now I'm scoring at 42xx again with an fps of 40, and I got disappointed. I just don't get it. Is it defective? Is it not defective? I dunno.
The only app I have installed so far is the Quadrant Standard app, everything else is complete stock.
My Device Memory is 386 MB used and 10 GB free.
When it comes to RAM, 760 MB used and 1 GB free.
Inside the Quadrant Standard app, I clicked on System Information, and I got:
CPU
Current frequency: 1,100 MHz
Max frequency: 1,600 MHz
Min frequency: 200 MHz
Cores: 4
Architecture: 7
Memory
Total: 1834220 kB
Free: 289936 kB
Inactive: 266112 kB
GPU (OpenGL)
Vendor: ARM
Renderer: Mali-400 MP
Version: OpenGL ES 2.0
Max texture units: 8
Max texture size: 4096
Max lights: 8
I know I don't have a screen shot, but I noticed that in Quadrant Standard, it says that my Max Frequency is 1,600 MHz, and that my Current Frequency is 1,100 MHz. My friend has the Note 2 also (Different Carrier), and his Max Frequency is 1,600 MHz also, but his Current Frequency is 1,600 MHz too!
Why is my frequency so low? Is that the cause for my phone not performing the way that it's supposed to? Is it a defect? Would I have to get my phone replaced, or would I be able to fix it myself?
I'm thinking of flashing a ROM on it also (never done this before), and I don't know if that will fix the problem or make it worse.
Currently, I still have only one app downloaded on my phone, and that's the Quadrant Standard app, everything else is stock.
Please read forum rules before posting
Questions go in Q&A
Thread moved
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
xMoKax said:
Why is my frequency so low? Is that the cause for my phone not performing the way that it's supposed to? Is it a defect? Would I have to get my phone replaced, or would I be able to fix it myself?
I'm thinking of flashing a ROM on it also (never done this before), and I don't know if that will fix the problem or make it worse.
Currently, I still have only one app downloaded on my phone, and that's the Quadrant Standard app, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you have Power Saving mode enabled. Turn it off and your current freq should be 1,600
CBConsultation said:
Because you have Power Saving mode enabled. Turn it off and your current freq should be 1,600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shouldn't the current frequency be lower if not under a lot of load? I was pretty sure our phones only clocked themselves up to 1600 when they needed to for battery saving reasons like other phone processors and i3/i5/i7s etc. Also, if I'm not mistaken it said that after the reset when it is acting fine.
I'm not familiar with most of your apps so I can't really help you narrow it down much. My best guess is that one of them had a background task to check for an update or something and somehow got stuck in a loop where it was calculating something, though even then unless it used multiple threads you shouldn't have had lag since 3 cores should be plenty for just moving around the interface. Did you try restarting your phone before the reset? And I'd read reviews of the apps as you redownload them to see if anyone has complained about an update doing this, etc.
flaring afro said:
Shouldn't the current frequency be lower if not under a lot of load? I was pretty sure our phones only clocked themselves up to 1600 when they needed to for battery saving reasons like other phone processors and i3/i5/i7s etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's right.
That "current frequency" listed in quadrant is never right.
The free app CPU Spy is a good way to read what the processor speed really is.
jmorton10 said:
Yes, that's right.
That "current frequency" listed in quadrant is never right.
The free app CPU Spy is a good way to read what the processor speed really is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's right and wrong. Typically when not under a load, the CPU cycles down to a lower frequency. But when you start Quadrant, the app automatically ramps up the clock frequency. I did the same test 4x on my device, twice with power savings on and twice with it off. And when power saving mode was enabled, my clock frequency showed 1100. When power saving mode with disabled, my clock frequency showed 1600.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

CPU 1.3 or 1.5 GHz?

In the specs it says: CPU runs with 1.5 GHz. But my phone runs with 1.3 GHz... :crying:
Bug? Wrong specs? What is your CPU running at? 1.3 or 1.5 GHz
Besides: The phone is fast as lightning. Just want to know
From what I heard it's real MT6753 1.5 GHz but downclock at 1.3 GHz due to battery power. If this is true, I can say very, very stupid reason.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
xdazilla said:
In the specs it says: CPU runs with 1.5 GHz. But my phone runs with 1.3 GHz... :crying:
Bug? Wrong specs? What is your CPU running at? 1.3 or 1.5 GHz
Besides: The phone is fast as lightning. Just want to know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, 1.3 is the specs I have seen and that is the same as the phone I have.
frankly I don't need any more speed at the moment... as this phone poops on phones for similar money available over here in the UK.
You could get the ZP999 for even more 'Zopo speed' but then you'd have an older OS, and a non removable battery... and lots of people complaining about having the battery run flat in a few hours... I think the Speed seven is the one to have!
Real specs..
Enviado do meu ZP951 através de Tapatalk
Netmatrix said:
Real specs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This still doesn't add up... Droid Info app shows there are 8 processor cores, and I can see it is possible to use all 8... but MT6735 only has 4 cores. How do you explain this? Does the phone have two MT6735 chips?
Someone from ZOPO should explain this.... it's an 8 core or a 4 core phone really?
If you look at the screenshot, it mentions first MT6753 and the reports the CPU as MT6735. So there is certainly something wrong and we can not trust it.
Just check the phone with AnTuTu a Geekbench and compare the results with other MT6753 phones. That would make it clear.
Enviado do meu ZP951 através de Tapatalk
In my Zopo Speed 7 plus
For the moment I can not send image (rule of the first 10 messages).
But mè cpu-z sees as 1.30 GHz:crying:
The revision of the processor is the same r0p4
@Netmatrix
Or you tinkering with the new kernel, and / or source code released?
it's my modified kernel but i don't have any speed improvement, and lowered the lowest stage at 199 Mhz
Netmatrix said:
it's my modified kernel but i don't have any speed improvement, and lowered the lowest stage at 199 Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it helps the battery to last longer!?

Honor 7 graphics GPU problem?

Hi! Suspecting a graphics problem.
So... I just bought this phone. I charged it and updated to 6.0, then installed my apps.
It seemd a bit sluggish when handling graphics, which made me test it with 3dmark. I ran SlingShot ES3.1 and got quite poor results in the graphics section. Physics were fine (CPU related, I guess). Screenshot below. The graphics score was 323 (in one review, which I cant link) and the reference score in app is 283. Mine is 71. I had nothing running background and the phone was recently restarted. What could be the reason?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Edit. Power plan is also set to "performance".
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
zinko_pt said:
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, good at single and multi core but not on graphics
memht said:
Actually, good at single and multi core but not on graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparatively to Qualcomm apples-to-apples you're wrong, due to it's higher frequency. Check P9 (Kirin 955) and Honor8 reviews when compared with SD820 and SD652.
zinko_pt said:
As you may know, this SOC does perform well in multitasking but not so in single task and graphics. It's common to all Kirin SOC.
That said, I got 69 score and 1320 Physics, so pretty standard.
It's not a gamer GPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then how is it possible that the same device has got very different scores when tested in reviews?
futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/Huawei+Honor+7/review
qtba said:
Then how is it possible that the same device has got very different scores when tested in reviews?
futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/Huawei+Honor+7/review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Different test settings. Apps installed, accounts, phone settings...
Sent from my PLK-L01 using Tapatalk
But the results surely should not be that bad? I mean, the graphics score I got was less than fourth of what I saw in different reviews. Only difference was, that the tests in reviews were ran with android 5.x still on board and I ran the test with 6.0 just installed. The futuremark test is standard.
My phone was mint condition. No programs on background. Nothing but the standard applicatins installed. Did not make a difference. I ran the test several times just to make sure (with reboots etc.). Socres were 66-71 (graphic score around 53-55).
qtba said:
But the results surely should not be that bad? I mean, the graphics score I got was less than fourth of what I saw in different reviews. Only difference was, that the tests in reviews were ran with android 5.x still on board and I ran the test with 6.0 just installed. The futuremark test is standard.
My phone was mint condition. No programs on background. Nothing but the standard applicatins installed. Did not make a difference. I ran the test several times just to make sure (with reboots etc.). Socres were 66-71 (graphic score around 53-55).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could even be different app versions. Unless you provide the reviews we'll be around endless speculation.
Having different kernel (5.1 vs 6.0.1) also makes a difference.
qtba said:
Hi! Suspecting a graphics problem.
So... I just bought this phone. I charged it and updated to 6.0, then installed my apps.
It seemd a bit sluggish when handling graphics, which made me test it with 3dmark. I ran SlingShot ES3.1 and got quite poor results in the graphics section. Physics were fine (CPU related, I guess). Screenshot below. The graphics score was 323 (in one review, which I cant link) and the reference score in app is 283. Mine is 71. I had nothing running background and the phone was recently restarted. What could be the reason?
Edit. Power plan is also set to "performance".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kirin processors aren't powerful enough for heavy games or single core demanding tasks
PalakMi said:
Kirin processors aren't powerful enough for heavy games or single core demanding tasks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, it´s widely documented throughout the web. Even Mali GPU in latest Exynos are more powerful.
zinko_pt said:
True, it´s widely documented throughout the web. Even Mali GPU in latest Exynos are more powerful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly

Antutu and Geekbench results of unlocked Moto Z?

When Moto Z was launched on June, on YouTube were shown some Antutu and Geekbench 3 results, with Antutu reporting up to 157000 on Force one and 147000 on "vanilla" Z because of a bit more throttling....
Great results, BUT they was Verizon's Droid edition, which were clocked @2.15 GHz...
Unlocked versions seem to be underclocked @1.8 GHz , so I'm interested in Antutu and Geekbench results of these one...
Somebody can post his results? Remember to test after a boot and with all resident apps closed for best results... :fingers-crossed:
enetec said:
When Moto Z was launched on June, on YouTube were shown some Antutu and Geekbench 3 results, with Antutu reporting up to 157000 on Force one and 147000 on "vanilla" Z because of a bit more throttling....
Great results, BUT they was Verizon's Droid edition, which were clocked @2.15 GHz...
Unlocked versions seem to be underclocked @1.8 GHz , so I'm interested in Antutu and Geekbench results of these one...
Somebody can post his results? Remember to test after a boot and with all resident apps closed for best results... :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
On pair with galaxy s7 and lg g5.
Tapatalkkal küldve az én XT1650 eszközömről
tavcsor said:
On pair with galaxy s7 and lg g5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting... BUT what frequencies report CPU-Z?
enetec said:
Interesting... BUT what frequencies report CPU-Z?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.8 GHz
Tapatalkkal küldve az én XT1650 eszközömről
I've scored 129000 in Antutu on the unlocked European version
rockster76 said:
I've scored 129000 in Antutu on the unlocked European version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would confirm it's a bit slower than Droid versions...
They are reported to reach 147.000 (157.000 on Force edition because of a bit better heat spread... read: less throttling...) on Antutu @2,15 GHz.
Math reporting this @1,8 GHz would give about 123.000.
Considering that only 2 of the 4 cores are underclocked, that memory, GPU, storage are still the same (and all tested by Antutu...), 129.000 is a reasonable result to be expected...
Anyway, I'm pretty sure that full clocked kernels will come out in few weeks...
For the record, see the device chart here: http://www.motorola.com/us/products/moto-z-family
CPU is indeed clocked at 1.8GHz
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources