So basically I have question whether larger resolution drains significant larger amount of battery energy.
For instance if we take both two screens : 5.7' vs 5.7'' both use same IPS technology 1080 vs 1440 Same Snapdragon 808 and Adreno 418 3GB of RAM 3000mah battery The reason I chosen same size hardware to give as much as possible identical condition part from pixel count.
Other comparison would be 5" vs 5.7" both use same IPS technology 1080 vs 1440 identical Snapdragon 808 and Adreno 418 3GB of RAM 3000mah .
If you also have any links bring them in!
Thanks
Related
BGR:
http://www.bgr.com/2011/08/03/bgr-and-qualcomm-celebrate-snapdragon™-rebranding-with-huge-giveaway/
ok it says are phone is capable of running 1080p??
Snapdragon System 3 (45nm, up to 1.5GHz dual-core CPU, Adreno 220 GPU, HSPA+, 1440 x 900 display, 1080p recording, Dolby 5.1, stereoscopic 3D)
And here also:
http://androidandme.com/2011/08/new...r-to-keep-track-of/attachment/old-snapdragon/
Now.. are we capable or not?
and if we can... why they took it out??
p.s
I love the fact are Evo 3d is top dog snapdragon king for now."System 3"
The CPU is capable, that's not the issue. The storage system speed would be as would the camera sensors ability to provide that many pixels at a frame rate that wasn't embarrassing in all but the perfect lighting. The sensor can already provide more than 2 times the necessary pixels.
1080p would be pretty rad if the phone is capable
Today I was showing my cousin Panda Run (copy of temple run, but is playable)
She downloaded it on her galaxy mini (exactly same specs as O1, but with touchwiz and half resolution display) and it had no lag at all!!(I am not saying it was smooth, the 320x240 does not support any smoothness, looks like ****)
Ok, but why did the performance on her phone at 245/600 (not rooted or anything, actually full of bloat) was higher than my phone on ICS at 320/787? (best performance I ever had)
Here is what I think:
1. The display makes it look lagless (like old phones with no possibility of smoothness, those had no lag)
2. Touchwiz
3. Our phone really sucks
4. Because of low resolution, it is 2x less processing...
So, what do you think it is? You can say more...
Seek the signature below the line
vlt96 said:
So, what do you think it is? You can say more...]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both the Galaxy Mini and P500 have a Adreno 200 as a GPU.
Since the Galaxy Mini is 240x320, it has to process 76 800 pixels. (240x320=76800)
The P500 is 320x480, so it has to process 153 600 pixels, exactly double that of the Galaxy Mini.
Both phones have the same GPU, but for ours, it has to process double the amount of pixels, so it makes sense for the performance to be half.
An example of this (non-Android), would be the iPad 3 vs iPad 2, although the new GPU is claimed to have 4x the performance (its shown to be close to that through benchmarks), real life performance is lower on the iPad 3 due to the higher resolution of the display.
dancom96 said:
Both the Galaxy Mini and P500 have a Adreno 200 as a GPU.
Since the Galaxy Mini is 240x320, it has to process 76 800 pixels. (240x320=76800)
The P500 is 320x480, so it has to process 153 600 pixels, exactly double that of the Galaxy Mini.
Both phones have the same GPU, but for ours, it has to process double the amount of pixels, so it makes sense for the performance to be half.
An example of this (non-Android), would be the iPad 3 vs iPad 2, although the new GPU is claimed to have 4x the performance (its shown to be close to that through benchmarks), real life performance is lower on the iPad 3 due to the higher resolution of the display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my 1st thought
Seek the signature below the line
I thought this was very interesting, somewhat common sense to some of us geeks/nerds/smarties out there, and worth a share.
Origin: http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/16554/is-the-samsung-galaxy-s4-really-worth-it/
Despite the amazing features in recent mobile phones that include, high speed quad core processors, large screen sizes, high-fidelity Graphic Processing Units (GPUs) and innovative designs, the mobile phones manufacturers are desperately trying to surpass each other.
A number of marketing tactics are being used to get us all excited, and persuade us to upgrade our phones.
Due to the tremendous advancements in hardware and software technology and the challenges posed by a very competitive market, the smart phone manufacturers are left only with the screen resolution to boast about and as an immediate eye-catching feature for a potential upgrade.
Samsung is already making a big deal about the full High Definition (HD) resolution of its Galaxy S4 introduced this month. Although the S4 is not the first phone to be equipped with an HD resolution, the terrific success of the S2 and S3 makes it an appealing get-as-soon-as-possible feature for Galaxy lovers.
If you are charmed by the HD resolution and intend on throwing extra money to upgrade your phone to S4, let us first analyse if a full HD smart phone screen is really worth draining your wallet.
Resolution is the prime determinant of a screen’s clarity. HD resolution refers to a High Definition screen having either 1280 x 720 pixels (720p) or 1920 x 1080 pixels (1080p/full-HD) spread along the width and height of the smart phone’s screen.
The pixel is the elementary area of illumination on the screen. The image displayed is composed of pixels. Therefore, higher the number of pixels, the sharper and crisper an image appears on the screen.
For an immediate comparison, you can check the resolution of your old smart phone (For example a Nokia 6600, 176 x 208 pixels) and that of a recent smart phone (like the Samsung Galaxy S3, 720 x 1280 pixels). You will immediately notice that the high resolution produces a much clearer and sharper image.
Nevertheless, resolution is not the only factor responsible for a sharper screen. Keeping the resolution the same and increasing the screen’s size separates the pixels, thus resulting in lost sharpness.
What really matters for determining a screen’s quality is the number of pixels packed in a given area. The term Pixel Per Inch (PPI) represents how many pixels there are in one inch of a screen’s area; the larger the number, the better the screen’s quality.
As an example, Nokia 6600 launched in 2003 has a PPI density of 130, whereas, Apple’s iPhone 4, sensationalised and marketed by the brand name Retina Display, has a PPI of 330. This produces a much sharper and vibrant image on the screen and makes other older phones look lacklustre.
Increasing the resolution does increase the PPI, provided that the screen size is not increased significantly. Two smart phones having the same screen sizes but different resolutions will have different figures for PPI.
Does it mean increasing the PPI indefinitely will produce even sharper images on the screen? The answer is no.
Our eyes can determine the quality of the contents on a screen if the pixels are distinguishable at the normal viewing distance. The reason why Apple called their iPhone 4 screen ‘Retina Display’ was that the 326 PPI pixel density was so high that individual pixels were indistinguishable to the human eye at the normal viewing distance. However, Retina Display is no longer an industry-leading figure.
HTC was one of the companies to develop a display beating that of the iPhone 4 with HTC Rezound (342 PPI). Nevertheless, if you compare the screens of Iphone 4 and HTC Rezound, I can bet you won’t be able to tell the difference.
The reason is that the human eye cannot distinguish the difference in PPI when the figure reaches a saturation point of about 300 (slightly exaggerated, otherwise some studies suggest a threshold of 250 PPI). Therefore, having a PPI of more than 300 will not make any difference to normal human eye unless you use a magnifying glass or have the screen pressed up against your eyeballs to see the subtle difference (of course you don’t want to do that).
Even for people with 20/20 vision, a full HD resolution would be a waste because most people’s eye can’t resolve sharpness above 250 PPI. The same goes for observing the photos quality. The pixel details in a photograph is always spread over more than one pixel and never perfectly aligned with the pixel structure of the display. So it will not matter whether you view the photographs on a 1080p or 720p display; they will appear the same. If you come across a smart phone having a PPI above 350, safely take it as a marketing stunt. It is not going to make the smart phone’s screen any sharper.
Consequently, a full HD (1080p) resolution is no better looking than 720p resolution in smart phones. A full HD resolution is only better for tablets, laptop screens, or monitors where the human eyes can resolve such a high resolution. The smart phones having 720p resolutions and sizes ranging from 4.3 to 4.7 inches have PPIs within the range 312 to 341. This PPI range is more than enough. Therefore, Samsung’s claim to give a sensational screen experience is pretty pompous.
Whereas, a full HD resolution necessitates using larger screen size (at least 5 inches) which is pretty annoying for small-sized phones lovers.
Another issue is the increased power consumption. The extra features in electronic devices don’t come for free. The price usually has to be paid in terms of high power consumption. A full HD display makes more demand from the processor and the GPU, which in turn needs more power to help it cope.
Although, the S4 has much improved battery (2600 mAh) as compared to the S3 (2100 mAh), it is still not sure if we can get improved battery life as well. We must not forget that the Apple iPad 4′s screen has a higher than 1080p resolution (2048 x 1536, but a PPI of 264), and a battery rated as 11666 mAh, while the iPad2 has a less than 720p resolution (1024 x 768, 132 PPI). Yet both provide the same 10-hours of use before needing a recharge.
The only advantage of a full HD screen in smart phone is that it gives more space for user interface elements such as button and text. For example, a webpage can fit to the screen, but the size of the contents decreases due to high resolution. In most of the cases, the viewer has to zoom in the contents to view them easily.
Due to these reasons, I still prefer to stick to my Xperia S with 720p resolution and a PPI of 341.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting read. Though I can definitely tell there is a difference when comparing my lte and the HTC one side by side. That being said when they aren't side by side I can't tell.
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
I would wager that you can only 'tell' because you read the spec .
My .02¢
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
scottspa74 said:
I would wager that you can only 'tell' because you read the spec .
My .02¢
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can see pixelation on my Evo's screen if I look closely. I can't see the same pixelation on the DNA's screen. There's a real difference, although you have to be a serious gadget nerd (like me) to care.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
scottspa74 said:
I would wager that you can only 'tell' because you read the spec .
My .02¢
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly my thinking.
maxpower7 said:
I can see pixelation on my Evo's screen if I look closely. I can't see the same pixelation on the DNA's screen. There's a real difference, although you have to be a serious gadget nerd (like me) to care.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I honestly cannot tell the difference at all. Although I saw a slight difference between my 3D and this EVO LTE. Maybe because I knew the specs though =p. I'm a big fan of sleeping at night. Lol.
... Sent from my 'Maybe the LTEvo wasn't such a bad idea afterall,' using the XDA Developers app.
ZTE Nubia Z7 Smartphone Highlight:
- 5.5-inch 2K Quad HD (2560 x 1440 pixels), 538 PPI
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor with Adreno 420 GPU
- 13 Megapixel HD OIS camera
- 3GB DDR3 RAM and 32GB ROM
- Nubia UI 2.0 base on Android 4.4 OS
- Support 4G FDD-LTE bands
- Support dual SIM cards
5.5 INCH SHARP 2K QUAD HD SCREEN
See the world in a way like never before through a remarkable 5.5” Quad HD screen. With a 2560x1440 resolution and 538 PPI display, you’ll have the highest resolution available at your fingertips.
QUALCOMM© SNAPDRAGON™ 801 PROCESSOR
Packing a 2.3GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC processor with Adreno 420 GPU, the ZTE Nubia Z7's operational capacity and performance are enhanced by Qualcomm's heterogeneous computing approach. This chipset harnesses the robust integration of many components for incredible speed and power efficiency. Among them, the custom Krait 450 CPU architecture for sustained peak performance, integrated 4G LTE connectivity and Adreno 420 GPU for superior graphics and gaming experience, boosting 3D interfaces, colors and textures.
BEST IN CLASS MEMORY
Using the new standard EMMC 5.0 you’ll be able to access and write on our 32GB of internal flash memory in the blink of an eye. 3GB of LP-DDR3 RAM running at 1866MHz allows flawless multitasking of even the most demanding apps.
GLOBAL 4G LTE
Enjoy blazing fast and smooth connectivity whether you're around the corner or across the world with ZTE Nubia Z7 powered by Qualcomm© Snapdragon™ processor with a 4G LTE multimode modem. Unlocked and contract-free, roam wherever you'd like the One by your side.
13 MEGAPIXEL OIS Camera
Many of us rely on our phones for taking all our photos, so we incorporated a camera that delivers astounding results. With dual LED flash, the OnePlus One’s camera will take photos you’ll want to share, day or night.
ALL DAY POWER EFFICIENCY
Shipping with the energy efficient Qualcomm© Snapdragon™ 801 chipset, the ZTE Nubia Z7 battery fits perfectly into the sleek body. The energy efficient display features CABC and DRAM (Display RAM) technology that adjust the level of backlight and differentiate between dynamic and static content on your screen. These technologies reduce the power consumed and allow you to run all your apps and data services, all day long.
Hello good morning.please I would like someone to help me in changing my infinix hot 6pro font .the developers disabled the custom font changing app due to some legal disturbance with the front app developer . but they told us that we can use a third party app to do so.I tried gx font but i t didn't work for my phone . I haven't rooted my device once and I have adb .the specs are 6.0-inch, TFT LCD capacitive touchscreen, 1440 X 720 pixels
18:9 Aspect Ratio
Quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 CPU with 2GB / 3GB RAM
Android 8.0 (Oreo), XOS Hummingbird 3.3
16GB / 32GB built-in storage, up to 128GB with a memory card
Dual 13MP + 2MP rear camera and 5MP front camera
4G LTE Data
Facial Recognition
Fingerprint Sensor (Rear)
4, 000 mAh non removable Li-Po battery ,processorQuad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
GPU: Adreno 308.please help me
It is my dvs
My device new ROM pls