Less frequent notifications - Huawei Ascend Mate 2

Does PAC already include this type of feature? I don't want to run another module if it's already implemented and I just can't find it.

Related

Ongoing WiFi Notification

I know many of the ROM guys have disabled ongoing WiFi notifications in their custom builds. Does anyone here have the information on how to disable on the stock ROM?
I've tried the SQL fix and it didn't seem to work (I may be doing it wrong). I saw a note somewhere that you may have to remove some other files to kill them, but I didn't want to break other aspects of the phone just to get the bar removed.
Thanks guys,
Ben

Feature request: blacklist

Hi everyone !
I just installed Paranoid Android and it is awesome, but I wasn't sure if I would install PA or CyanogenMod, and one of the killer features of CM is for me the blacklist (block incoming call + messages from select numbers)
Will this functionnality be implemented in PA in the future ?
Thanks a lot !
I'd like this feature to be implemented too, it's the only missing feature i need.
Why i Asked this feature to? Cause I'm paranoid.
I think this is a very important feature and the incall recording. Hope the team can enable them.
Yep , I think it will not be implement
This forum should not be used for feature requests. We have a bug tracker where all bugs and feature requests belong.
#stayparanoid

[Q] Remove menu/back gestures

Hi all,
I'm running the custom monXDified ROM on my Omate Truesmart and request you some helps. All is fine now, except for the keyboard I installed : Touchpal X.
I use the swipe writing, and when words begin with the letters far left or far right, Touchpal does anything as the menu/back swipe action is triggered by android. Even I use "Ultimate dynamic navbar", and try to set "no action" for swipe left or right, these last are always triggered.
So I think the built-in gestures function is overrode somewhere in android. Does someone know how to fix it, I've tried many things but without success . Thanks in advance.
PS : sorry, I can't already post external links for the apps above.
Nobody interested in it ?
miosotys38 said:
So I think the built-in gestures function is overrode somewhere in android. Does someone know how to fix it, I've tried many things but without success . Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is deep in the Umeox ROM and cannot be configured (unless the ROM has secret settings).
It may be possible to use Xposed to replace the system calls, but you will probably remove other functionality too...
(Xposed is powerful, but Xposed apps have to be hacks.)
gerhardo said:
This is deep in the Umeox ROM and cannot be configured (unless the ROM has secret settings).
It may be possible to use Xposed to replace the system calls, but you will probably remove other functionality too...
(Xposed is powerful, but Xposed apps have to be hacks.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried Xposed module, but it always triggers the native gestures and sometimes the custom action in Xposed module at the same time. So no solution yet, if someone finds it, please share.
miosotys38 said:
I tried Xposed module, but it always triggers the native gestures and sometimes the custom action in Xposed module at the same time. So no solution yet, if someone finds it, please share.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To clarify: You will have to trace the ROM and implement the Xposed hooks yourself to disable the built in gestures (unless Umeox has some secret settings).
I understand but I don't know how to do this exactly and which tools to use. I'm not friendly with android development tools yet. Can you give details please ?
miosotys38 said:
I understand but I don't know how to do this exactly and which tools to use. I'm not friendly with android development tools yet. Can you give details please ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xposed tutorial:
https://github.com/rovo89/XposedBridge/wiki/Development-tutorial
Developing Xposed is something in between kernel hacking and app development.
The tutorial suggests using the AOSP code, but this is not possible here. Maybe the modifications are included in the TS code drops, I do not where to start looking.
If you need to ask, you should probably not even think about it....
Thanks for all answers. So I'll see if it is really useful to solve this problem or not.

[MOD][Xposed] Notification Count

Requires Xposed Framework by rovo89. Special thanks to him!
Notification Count badge for all Android versions
Shows a notification count badge on StatusBar icons providing a quantity.
Makes this badge customizable and extendable.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This module adds a badge with a number next to notification icons, when the notification has a quantity (e.g. messages).
This is a built-in Android functionality, this module works as enabler for this function.
See Xposed Repo information for details about the current features of the module.
Download
You can download this mod from the Xposed Repo official website:
http://repo.xposed.info/module/com.woalk.apps.xposed.notifcount
Alternatively, there is always an APK on GitHub tied to a release tag.
But for Download counting purposes, I would ask you to use the Xposed Repo if it's no problem for you.
Have fun with the module!
Bug reporting:
IMPORTANT. Please read.
Please do not report bugs like "Hey noob-dev, it doesn't work, bye.".
Always attach at least your Xposed log to an error report.
Also, additional information can never be bad. Android version, Xposed version, device/ROM; exact behavior when the error occurs (e.g. "No number badge is shown, on no notifications, neither on the debug notifications nor on any app's.").
This will make fixing easier, faster and better to understand for everybody in the thread maybe having the same issue.
Thank you.
Changelog:
Version 3.2
Fixed some Xposed errors on Marshmallow.
Added secure lockscreen count.
Version 3.1
New app list engine.
RAM management should be better.
Loading time is a lot faster.
The list is searchable.
Switch to Material design on older devices, too; smaller UI changes.
Added "Extract number from notification content".
Fixed system integration on HTC Sense Lollipop devices.
Added possibility to change alpha value of number badges.
Version 3.0
You can now adjust the notification badge style freely (color, size).
You can now change the behavior of the 'Exception list' from blacklist to whitelist (again).
The Notification Count settings can now be integrated into Android's notification long-click menu.
Version 2.0
Cancel test notifications before sending new ones, to apply appearance changes faster.
Added Russian language (partially). Thanks GitHub user GromozavrStas.
Added `auto-decide` feature:
Automatically choose which way to use to fetch a number from a notification that does not provide a value by itself.
Use either the title, summary or update count for this purpose.
Some apps that cause problems can be forced to use a specific way of the available ones.
UI updates to fit those needs.
Version 1.1.1-re
Fixed bug that only let save whitelist items currently visible on screen.
Version 1.1-re
Added ability to hide launcher icon.
New 'workaround' mode: Extract number from notification description.
This new mode only works on KitKat and later for now.
Only enable this for apps that provide a notification number in their notification's small description!
Version 1.0-re
Restart of version numbering.
Initial version.
Main changes against the old module:
- Added support for Lollipop.
- Added ability to customize number badge.
See https://github.com/woalk/NotifCount/releases/tag/v1.0-re for full version changes against the old module.
See the git tag description of this release (can be found under https://github.com/woalk/NotifCount/tags) for programmer-related changelog.​
Author & Copyright Information
This module was first developed by GitHub user bbukowski.
His version was not updated since August 2014, and did not work on Lollipop.
I forked his repo and added my changes.
I added a pull request for my changes and will let him keep the 'right' ownership about this module if he wants to.
Look for README.md in my GitHub repo of this module for more information.
XDA:DevDB Information
Notification Count, Xposed for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
Woalk, bbukowski
Source Code: https://github.com/woalk/NotifCount
Xposed Package Name: com.woalk.apps.xposed.notifcount
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: v3.2
Stable Release Date: 2016-05-31
Created 2015-05-06
Last Updated 2016-06-02
Working very well on JB 4.3, good job[emoji122] [emoji122]
Works with Android 5.11 CM12.1?
HGT - S5 G900F - Oneplus One - Tesla TTL7
KuaQ said:
Working very well on JB 4.3, good job[emoji122] [emoji122]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm happy that you're happy.
HorstiG said:
Works with Android 5.11 CM12.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't CM have this feature out-of-the-box?
But, yes, it should. Even while it may need you to enable the feature in CM settings (setting preference Settings.System.STATUS_BAR_NOTIF_COUNT, if I'm not completely wrong).
Just try it out.
this is a nice module.. thx..
a few suggestions..
- is it possible to enable new options (currently the display style) on the fly instead of rebooting?
- for the option styles, would be nice if a combination of styles (transparent+small) is allowed..
- for the option styles, customisable colour would be nice..
iamelton said:
this is a nice module.. thx..
a few suggestions..
- is it possible to enable new options (currently the display style) on the fly instead of rebooting?
- for the option styles, would be nice if a combination of styles (transparent+small) is allowed..
- for the option styles, customisable colour would be nice..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, display style applies for every new notification instantly after selecting.
It does however not apply for already present notifications.
You can test this out with the 'Debug' options: Create any notification with a number, change number appearance, then swipe away your notification and select the option "without number" to force creation of a new notification.
After that, you can either use "with" or "without number" again to test the new style.
If it applies to a specific app depends on whether the app stores the existing notification for re-use or creates a new one.
Suggestions noted, I feared that they would be requested.
Will work on that soon.
and maybe also an option to hide the launcher icon, as i usually use xposed installer to manage all those modules?
Doesn't work on my Nexus 5 with stock 5.0.1
iamelton said:
and maybe also an option to hide the launcher icon, as i usually use xposed installer to manage all those modules?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, on GitHub already, will be in the next release.
reallyimjesus said:
Doesn't work on my Nexus 5 with stock 5.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a shame... Xposed log?
Thank you for this module only problem is that Whatsapp notifications constantly increment without having incoming new messages running CM12.
Sent from my LG-D415 using XDA Free mobile app
DallasBelt said:
Thank you for this module only problem is that Whatsapp notifications constantly increment without having incoming new messages running CM12.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. Will look into it today.
WhatsApp is using the 'workaround', isn't it?
Woalk said:
Yes, on GitHub already, will be in the next release.
That's a shame... Xposed log?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry for the trouble! I was having the older Notification Count module active instead of this one (the old one DID not work; but this one does yaaay!!). Silly me... :silly: Sorry again!
reallyimjesus said:
I am sorry for the trouble! I was having the older Notification Count module active instead of this one (the old one DID not work; but this one does yaaay!!). Silly me... :silly: Sorry again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, that's a relief. No problem, it works, and this counts.
New version 1.1
A new version is available on Xposed Repo!
Changes are the ability to hide the launcher icon (requested by @iamelton)
and a new kind of 'workaround' mode, where the number of the notification is extracted from a string in the notification usually containing its number.
This may be a fix for WhatsApp (reported), try it out @DallasBelt, as I don't use WhatsApp that much.
The style suggestions will be added later, don't worry.
Have fun.
Woalk said:
A new version is available on Xposed Repo!
Changes are the ability to hide the launcher icon (requested by @iamelton)
and a new kind of 'workaround' mode, where the number of the notification is extracted from a string in the notification usually containing its number.
This may be a fix for WhatsApp (reported), try it out @DallasBelt, as I don't use WhatsApp that much.
The style suggestions will be added later, don't worry.
Have fun.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! A little review:
It would be nice if it also searched for number of notifications in the title of the notifications (example: google play: N apps updated).
The "whitelist" section is necessary? Couldn't the app just first try to find a number normally, and then if no number is found switch to any of those methods, until it finds any? Like this.
(Notification on the text for some app appears)
1) Check for the number in the notification number count. Nothing found -> switch to 2)
2) Check for the number in the notification title. Not found -> switch to 3)
3) Check for the number in the notification text. Found (only if not found switch to 4)
4) Count updates
Some apps could have wrong info, so the app still should have some "exceptions" list for rare cases like whatsapp, but not a global whitelist for like 90% of the apps I think.
Thad't be awesome!!
Also, the count style only changes if you dismiss the notification, why? couldn't you make it that when generating one test notification you first close the other one? so this would be done automatically. Right now it closes too but the new style isn't applied..
Edit: I just tested increasing the test notification until >999 (yes I spent some time hah). Why >999 and not 1xxx? In small numbers it can be there lol. Also the > is half broken lol
Thanks a lot! :good::good: Keep up the nice work.
RusherDude said:
Nice! A little review:
It would be nice if it also searched for number of notifications in the title of the notifications (example: google play: N apps updated).
The "whitelist" section is necessary? Couldn't the app just first try to find a number normally, and then if no number is found switch to any of those methods, until it finds any? Like this.
(Notification on the text for some app appears)
1) Check for the number in the notification number count. Nothing found -> switch to 2)
2) Check for the number in the notification title. Not found -> switch to 3)
3) Check for the number in the notification text. Found (only if not found switch to 4)
4) Count updates
Some apps could have wrong info, so the app still should have some "exceptions" list for rare cases like whatsapp, but not a global whitelist for like 90% of the apps I think.
Thad't be awesome!!
Also, the count style only changes if you dismiss the notification, why? couldn't you make it that when generating one test notification you first close the other one? so this would be done automatically. Right now it closes too but the new style isn't applied..
Thanks a lot! :good::good: Keep up the nice work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Number in title: Yes, right, that should also be an option. I somehow missed that out...
Whitelist: At the first thought I would say it is necessary, because really every notification would get a number without... But maybe this isn't even bad, as you say. Needs to be tested how it acts in real use. I will try it out.
Style applying on-the-fly: At least for the 'Without number' notification it's obviously needed that the notification updates instead of creates itself newly. But right, the 'With number' should be totally ok with creating a new one. If it makes you happy to see the style change with two touches less on the screen...
Applying the style completely on-the-fly, i.e. not only for the test notifications but for all app's, would be a bit more complicated. Maybe it will be implemented when I implement 'real' custom styles as requested in the thread, have to see how this will act on performance.
Thank you very much for your suggestions!
This is constructive feedback I'd like to see more on the internet.
Woalk said:
Number in title: Yes, right, that should also be an option. I somehow missed that out...
Whitelist: At the first thought I would say it is necessary, because really every notification would get a number without... But maybe this isn't even bad, as you say. Needs to be tested how it acts in real use. I will try it out.
Style applying on-the-fly: At least for the 'Without number' notification it's obviously needed that the notification updates instead of creates itself newly. But right, the 'With number' should be totally ok with creating a new one. If it makes you happy to see the style change with two touches less on the screen...
Applying the style completely on-the-fly, i.e. not only for the test notifications but for all app's, would be a bit more complicated. Maybe it will be implemented when I implement 'real' custom styles as requested in the thread, have to see how this will act on performance.
Thank you very much for your suggestions!
This is constructive feedback I'd like to see more on the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome
Constructive feedback? A lot of devs hate me cause I spam too much suggestions :laugh::laugh:
PS: You didn't notice the >999 issue tho :laugh:
Will it work on Xposed Super Alpha?
I'm using Moto G GPe 5.1 stock.
RusherDude said:
Awesome
PS: You didn't answer the >999 issue tho :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't say anything about that...
Does it behave strangely then, like I would think now?
That would not be my fault, the basic implementation of the numbers are by Android itself... ?
But I'll see if I can get around them and replace it like "99+".
Phew, a big To-Do list growth for one day.
Umer520 said:
Will it work on Xposed Super Alpha?
I'm using Moto G GPe 5.1 stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, as I can't test Xposed for 5+ in an emulator (arm-only) and I don't have a developer device running 5.1 currently. Maybe I'll try installing the newest CM in the next days or week..
If you're ready to take the risk — as you are, because you installed Super Alpha — you can try for yourself, I would be curious how it does.
Woalk said:
You didn't say anything about that...
Does it behave strangely then, like I would think now?
That would not be my fault, the basic implementation of the numbers are by Android itself... ��
But I'll see if I can get around them and replace it like "99+".
Phew, a big To-Do list growth for one day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did hehe:
Edit: I just tested increasing the test notification until >999 (yes I spent some time hah). Why >999 and not 1xxx? In small numbers it can be there lol. Also the > is half broken lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I think u were replying already so missed it , like my edit on the previous post haha :laugh:
Do not reduce the number of digits! at least 3 is necessary lol, but ending in + instead of the > is better yea

[Q] BEST lollipop rom for g3 --stock vs aosp--

hi my friend i have the verizon lg g3, running on kitkat custom stock rom.. skydragon!!
i want to know about what rom have more satbility, battery perfomance
im looking for this on a stock custom rom:
lollipop rom
no problem with xposed
everything works like a charm...
lg smart cover and smart cover works running xposed too
no crash in the more setting.
battery perfomance
system stability
PD: i know that some thread have a quick cover app.. to replace the stock app.. and its working with the g3 plus xposed! somebody test it or can review that!
if the rom is AOSP what rom is better and contain the following features:
double tap to sleep everywhere
double tap to wake
knock code
lg quick circle cover &smart weather
infrared controller
system stability
battery performance
some way to use google now theme with appdrawer folder?
PD: i know that some thread have a quick cover app.. to replace the stock app.. and its working with the g3 plus xposed! somebody test it or can review that!
i really feel very thankfull about the answer of this thread..
thnks you in advance
And I want a wife who has hot friends and will not sleep with anyone else but will let me hook up with said hot friends at will...
The point is: It's give and take; you have to figure out what is most important and go with it.
I may suggest that you learn a little more about Android, licensing, and the differences between stock and AOSP before laying out your list of demands, because many of these are just not possible.
Stock:
Xposed is currently in an alpha state on Lollipop, requires the removal of the smart weather and cover apps, in order to function on KitKat and Lolllipop alike. Going to the "More settings...." will produce a crash as a result of this removal. That is clearly noted in numerous threads for Xposed on LG.
AOSP/CM:
Knock code is an LG feature that requires their framework and, I think, a kernel module, too; no dice on AOSP.
You can get double tap to wake, double tap anywhere to sleep on lockscreen, and double tap on status bar anywhere. The implementation on status bar only is far smarter.
Quick cover is available; not sure about the circle..
LG Weather is an LG app and requires their framework; no dice. There are far better options available anyway.
The IR may not lend itself to every app, but the QRemote app has been ported and works great.
Google Now is available.
App drawer folders are a feature of certain launchers and most work fine on AOSP ROMs.
You may test anything that you like where it comes to Xposed. I'm sure that the devs would appreciate detailed feedback.
epidenimus said:
And I want a wife who has hot friends and will not sleep with anyone else but will let me hook up with said hot friends at will...
The point is: It's give and take; you have to figure out what is most important and go with it.
I may suggest that you learn a little more about Android, licensing, and the differences between stock and AOSP before laying out your list of demands, because many of these are just not possible.
Stock:
Xposed is currently in an alpha state on Lollipop, requires the removal of the smart weather and cover apps, in order to function on KitKat and Lolllipop alike. Going to the "More settings...." will produce a crash as a result of this removal. That is clearly noted in numerous threads for Xposed on LG.
AOSP/CM:
Knock code is an LG feature that requires their framework and, I think, a kernel module, too; no dice on AOSP.
You can get double tap to wake, double tap anywhere to sleep on lockscreen, and double tap on status bar anywhere. The implementation on status bar only is far smarter.
Quick cover is available; not sure about the circle..
LG Weather is an LG app and requires their framework; no dice. There are far better options available anyway.
The IR may not lend itself to every app, but the QRemote app has been ported and works great.
Google Now is available.
App drawer folders are a feature of certain launchers and most work fine on AOSP ROMs.
You may test anything that you like where it comes to Xposed. I'm sure that the devs would appreciate detailed feedback.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My work around for double tap to sleep anywhere was to use slim actions and place it on the home screen as well as double tap on status bar or nav bar.
I've been on aicp for a while now and really enjoying it. Very solid and a lot of features.

Categories

Resources