Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6lDlpRDegOCYlg2bVpnN0g5Sms
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
dimi30 said:
Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you upload the images directly? They look like they've been compressed, especially since it went through whatever editing software to write the models in.
LG G5 is classes above the Redmi series, they are not even comparable. Perhaps the real comparison would be between LG G5 and Xiaomi Mi5.
RN4 is a good phone indeed but it falls into the mid-range class.
dimi30 said:
Good morning to everyone. As I wrote yesterday, I prepared a mini photo quality comparison between rdn4 and LG G5.
Unfortunately I could not get out a lot of photos (I was in-laws in the village?))
But I was able to take off several mainly nearby.
I can say that many times the result surprised me!
Really worthy rdn4 standing against device wearing of the best cameras of 2016 !! (LG G5)
At the end I will do and link from google drive folder with the photos in their original quality.
I expect comments?)
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6lDlpRDegOCYlg2bVpnN0g5Sms
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the great comparison! It really highlights the real world camera performance difference in less than ideal (mostly low light, which the G5 is well equipped to handle) conditions. The Redmi 4 does well for its price, but it really is miles behind in terms of detail (extremely soft photos), its white balance is off but at least noise is kept to acceptable levels. It's camera algorithms are surprisingly mature, showing less oversharpening and fringing than the G5 and that considering it had to work a lot harder trying to retain detail with that poor sensor and lens. Can you do a follow-up review in good light?
Looks like The G5 has a better camera. Bad news :/
I have a Redmi Note 4 and the camera is decent, not not very good.
In low light condition it is even worst...
All the Redmi pictures have a horrible yellow tint. Plus the lack of OIS makes the pictures blurry - especially the one with the potted plant
Related
can anyone who has uograded to another give me there opinion of there new phone camera vs th:angel:e rezound please
lg-sony-htc-samsung-apple said:
can anyone who has uograded to another give me there opinion of there new phone camera vs th:angel:e rezound please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to elaborate? I don't understand what you're asking.
sorry for the bad english
what i was trying to ask is if anyone has upgraded to a newer phone compared to the rezound, how do they find the camera performance of the new phone is vs the rezound, reason being is i have a a few newer devices like iphone 5 and g pro but still seem to prefer the camera performance in terms of overall quality of the picture of the rezound and would just like to get users opinions on other devices camera performance thank you
I went to an LG G2. I miss my rezound camera. The G2's is decent, but the rez was so quick.
Posted from my LG G2
Fastbird said:
I went to an LG G2. I miss my rezound camera. The G2's is decent, but the rez was so quick.
Posted from my LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rooted?
Check this mod out for the camera on your G2 - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2548974
Use Intelligent Auto mode with it, it's quick.
my pic
is my pic
i I took this picture uni
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
thank you
i hope that more people can give me examples i really miss my rez but heard so many horror stories on here about phone failure i dont want to buy a used one again
i went to the g pro as my daily driver looking at a sony at the moment
a eg of the rez pic
from a plane about 10000 up
Here are a few shots from a stock G2 with the stock camera app, Here are some full resolution images to compare, the camera blows my Rezound away, ignore the content and look at the details, its just work stuff... All settings are default and set to auto.
13M image with flash in very low light conditions - http://i.imgur.com/zMry3i3.jpg
13M image without flash in indoor low-moderate light - http://i.imgur.com/lhQeeYk.jpg
13M image without flash in indoor bright light conditions - http://i.imgur.com/d9s14je.jpg
13M image outdoors in mid-day cloudy conditions - http://i.imgur.com/6PrH45f.jpg
thank you those pic look great i need a phone for work and the g pro is not suited
acejavelin said:
Here are a few shots from a stock G2 with the stock camera app, Here are some full resolution images to compare, the camera blows my Rezound away, ignore the content and look at the details, its just work stuff... All settings are default and set to auto.
13M image with flash in very low light conditions - http://i.imgur.com/zMry3i3.jpg
13M image without flash in indoor low-moderate light - http://i.imgur.com/lhQeeYk.jpg
13M image without flash in indoor bright light conditions - http://i.imgur.com/d9s14je.jpg
13M image outdoors in mid-day cloudy conditions - http://i.imgur.com/6PrH45f.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow i think i will try and buy G2 NOW THAT THE g3 is comming prices are already dropping have you ever compared your pics to that of the s4 ?
The darker image is from the Resound the lighter is from the One. This is in a dark area to show the low light difference, so both will be a little grainy
Sent from my HTC6500LVW
wow night and day
Without a doubt. Thanks. The comparison
Hey all,
Although i haven't found any reviews after today's Google event with test pictures. theverge.com has " the first images from the new Nexus 5X and 6P camera". I'm unsure of the EXIF data on these, but its a start... enjoy!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
*Credit: The Verge
I hope that was a really early pre-production unit because that's not very promising for all the hype they pumped at the event.
The bench one isn't focused properly.
The night time cityscape has a ton of noise and poor focus.
tebore said:
I hope that was a really early pre-production unit because that's not very promising for all the hype they pumped at the event.
The bench one isn't focused properly.
The night time cityscape has a ton of noise and poor focus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One thing I noticed is that the black strip's edge was really sharp and odd looking.
found some test photos from both 6P & 5X here: http://venturebeat.com/2015/09/29/hands-on-with-lgs-nexus-5x-and-huaweis-nexus-6p/
selfie looks NICE on the 6P
Looks pretty good to me. I don't think it will be anywhere near S6 though. The selfie camera on S6 Edge is unreal. It makes you look better than you actually look in real life which I'm assuming is part software too lol.
Low light ones seem very poor.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A
https://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/nexus_6p-rev/
10 pictures taken whit the phone on this site.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Is it just me or do some of the pictures look oversaturated? Especially the one with the red wooden bench.
Compared to the crap that other Nexus devices shot these look quite good. Are they Note 5 quality? No. I don't think they are bad though in the slightest.
Found this 6P photo album on Twitter with a little Googlin'. The VP Eng (Android) @ Google posted this.
Davey Burke said:
The talented @romainguy took the new Nexus 6P for a test drive yesterday. Impressive results!
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1...?key=R2R6Y2xEcUd2cVJtbDVWVWcwdU9GMXVzTFlEUXlB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better than my expectation for picture wise.
DXO
excellent, 2nd best DXO score after S6 edge !
http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Google-Nexus-6P-review-Serious-contender-for-mobile-photography
Slow mo - https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii/posts/LJM7nooQ8Ye
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
italia0101 said:
Slow mo - https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii/posts/LJM7nooQ8Ye
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy crap I enjoyed that. Thanks
that slow mo was sick as hell. I really like nexus phones for their dev support. wish i can get one from Singapore soon
These photos are great. For the bench photo, it was simply focused on the grass instead which is as easy as touching the screen to change focus.
dewedMountain said:
Looks pretty good to me. I don't think it will be anywhere near S6 though. The selfie camera on S6 Edge is unreal. It makes you look better than you actually look in real life which I'm assuming is part software too lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha that's exactly what my wife kept saying about the G4, the selfie camera on the G4 imo is better than the Moto X Pure and the OPT.
I thought the pictures above were fine.
As long as it's better than the G4 like some reviewers have mentioned I'll be happy
I'm looking at the pictures on my iMac at work and I have the brightness pumped up just to see how good they are... I must say, I'm pretty impressed! I'm not sure what kind of quality you guys are looking for but I suggest you go buy a camera at this point. It's a SMARTPHONE first then somewhere down the line it's a Camera as well. Let's not confuse what we're investing our hard earned money into.
many of the photos that are going to be posted by Googlers will have filters applied im assuming (all stuff that can be done right in the photos app or snapseed). but for point and shoot, i think they are pretty impressive for the stock nexus camera app which usually isn't up to par.
Real photos in full res:
Here at Phandroid
and
here on a russian site
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Good quality pictures
for the ones that needs extreme level of sharpness in images, i consider this good
Hello.
Now my turn. Ill just post pictures.
Redmi Note 4 - RR - OpenCamera on STD
https://allthepics.net/image/lWPSY
Redmi Note 4 - RR - GCamMod - STD
https://allthepics.net/image/lWvrB
My old device in a similar price point: ASUS ZE500KL - to compare devices: https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=8531&idPhone2=7474#global,*,*]
https://allthepics.net/image/lWpJr
More mido shots available here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rosy30ihtfs3bmu/Camera-Test-NEVER-DELETE-FROM-DROPBOX-OR-DIE.zip?dl=0] - ACHTUNG DATA USERS - the file is almost 120 MB
Protips
On MIUI the camera quality is a bit better than on LineageOS based roms.
If You are really in the manual controls just for fun or not You will need to edit the build.prop file and that needs root.
The light sensor can suffer gratefully in low light conditions generating a lot of noise.
If Your goal is to get the best pictures in the World of mobiles eg. visible every single snowflake in mid air without smudges => get a DSLR camera and a phone.
The stutter is pretty much responsive there is almost no lag when pressing the shot button
great photos!
Camera quality is excellent with Google Camera with AutoHDR+.
Quality is comparable with my entry-level 10 years old compact camera when shot in raw. Not the best camera in the market but more than enough for average usage.
_mov_ax said:
Quality is comparable with my entry-level 10 years old compact camera when shot in raw. Not the best camera in the market but more than enough for average usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does note 4 support RAW mode?
iamfoolish said:
Does note 4 support RAW mode?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only if you unlock the bootloader and add camera2api support on build.prop or mods
My note 4x front camera is significantly worse than my friends note 4x camera
It's really noticable
Any way to fix this?
I am rooted and have twrp installed
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
There is still no solution (Redmi Note 4X). Oreo will probably not be. In vain, the camera2api works, Gcam is not good. [emoji849][emoji848][emoji2955]
Tapatalkkal Redmi Note 4X
Lui7601 said:
There is still no solution (Redmi Note 4X). Oreo will probably not be. In vain, the camera2api works, Gcam is not good. [emoji849][emoji848][emoji2955]
Tapatalkkal Redmi Note 4X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what custom ROMs are for. We have Oreo and Pie (in early stage) and perfectly working GCams which makes our camera a lot better than on MIUI
GCam port by BSG produce very good quality photos with HDR+ mode. No lag while taking snap.
I have using my device for more than 3 years now. I mostly use it for communicating over chat apps and media consumption. I have been using various builds of LineageOS (official and unoffical) after the first year of purchase. But more importantly, Gcam has been with me even before that. I started using Gcam mods like that of BSG's 5.* during early years of development.
After coming long way now, the mods are mostly stable and all the included features works flawlessly (keeping in mind the device specific restrictions). The first thing after setting up my device after installing a new custom ROM (or upgrading) I do is install Gcam mod without doing anything else.
I really need to know if various ported Google camera apps works well for this phone. As in you can continuously take photos without the app lagging or run into issues.
I used to have an LG G6 and it worked great with Gcam. Now I have a V35 and Gcam works terrible for it, I've tried all the different dev version and it's all the same. Gcam would take the first two photos fine, then the third time onward it would become jerky while taking photo and taking 3 times as long to finish the shot (6+ seconds). Bottom line is the G6 takes better photos than my V35 because of this.
I am on the fence about buying a new Pixel 3a or used Pixel 3 just for the camera alone. But I've been concerned about Google quality control and how well the hardware will last. I've read so many hardware issues with the Pixel 1 and 2 so I don't even want to touch them. So I'm considering giving the V30 a try, but I really need that Gcam working well. I don't mind owning another LG phone as I love the quadDAC.
eksasol said:
I really need to know if various ported Google camera apps works well for this phone. As in you can continuously take photos without the app lagging or run into issues.
I used to have an LG G6 and it worked great with Gcam. Now I have a V35 and Gcam works terrible for it, I've tried all the different dev version and it's all the same. Gcam would take the first two photos fine, then the third time onward it would become jerky while taking photo and taking 3 times as long to finish the shot (6+ seconds). Bottom line is the G6 takes better photos than my V35 because of this.
I am on the fence about buying a new Pixel 3a or used Pixel 3 just for the camera alone. But I've been concerned about Google quality control and how well the hardware will last. I've read so many hardware issues with the Pixel 1 and 2 so I don't even want to touch them. So I'm considering giving the V30 a try, but I really need that Gcam working well. I don't mind owning another LG phone as I love the quadDAC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For LG V30, especially on most recent firmware, stock LG cam works well. One of the major requests for custom ROMs is to somehow get LG stock cam back.
eksasol said:
I really need to know if various ported Google camera apps works well for this phone. As in you can continuously
snip
I don't mind owning another LG phone as I love the quadDAC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Gcam ports I've tried are really best used for 1) night sight (long processing time for ea pic) 2) rear camera enhanced plus - but only 1 shot at a time.
The ports are simply not perfect. They don't work as well as the regular LG cam app - except in the cases already mentioned.
That said, I think it really comes down to what your needs are. For me, having both apps installed works very well (just use whichever is appropriate for the situation). But if you believe the GCam app (on a google phone) would be that much better re fast multiple shots, then that would have to be your choice.
Lastly, it's *possible* the next version of Pixel phones has a dual rear lens. That would change things quite a bit I think, as the GCam ports of that app would then probably be more likely to be fully functional.
This is a night sight pic with the 'No Hex' version of the Gcam ports, taken at about 4am, notice the black sky...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cheers
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://trackerninja.codeberg.page/post/sony-xperia-pro-i-vs-nokia-pureview-808-2021-vs-2012/
#sony #xpreria #pro-i #nokia #808 #nokia808 #spacedrone808 #trackerninja #trackerninja808 #comparison #detail #resolution #review
Terrific stuff here. A friend just had his 808 rebuilt. (Then he bought a Samsung! Who would-a-thunk-it?) In other comparisons like this I notice the Sony tends to bring some yellow or off-white tone to the photos. What had the colors that are closer to the actual?
Colors is not an issue here, they could be easily corrected in RAW or raster editor.
But resolution is a disappointment. I've expected at least 20% advance over Nokia.
spacedrone808 said:
Colors is not an issue here, they could be easily corrected in RAW or raster editor.
But resolution is a disappointment. I've expected at least 20% advance over Nokia.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah. Got yah.
There is a big mistake. For Nokia 808 there exists a number of mods, one is even made by a russian hacker Osenok, one of many that let you shoot in full resolution with 100% jpeg quality.
Having seen the examples and comparisons, even the xiaomi / samsung with 108mp sensors couldn't resolve more details than the more-than-10-year-old Nokia 808.
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Walking on the wild side: upping the Nokia 808 to full 41MP status?
Following an interesting Twitter exchange, and in light of the paucity of new updates coming out for the Nokia 808 PureView, I'm more inclined to give publicity to what are normally classed as 'hacks', breaking through the usual Symbian OS safeguards in order to achieve extra functionality. In...
www.allaboutsymbian.com
Search for Nokia 808 mod.
saved-j said:
There is a big mistake. For Nokia 808 there exists a number of mods, one is even made by a russian hacker Osenok, one of many that let you shoot in full resolution with 100% jpeg quality.
Having seen the examples and comparisons, even the xiaomi / samsung with 108mp sensors couldn't resolve more details than the more-than-10-year-old Nokia 808.
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Walking on the wild side: upping the Nokia 808 to full 41MP status?
Following an interesting Twitter exchange, and in light of the paucity of new updates coming out for the Nokia 808 PureView, I'm more inclined to give publicity to what are normally classed as 'hacks', breaking through the usual Symbian OS safeguards in order to achieve extra functionality. In...
www.allaboutsymbian.com
Search for Nokia 808 mod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test was done with mod applied.
As for modern so called "108 mpix":
XIAOMI MI 11 ULTRA VS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808 [2021 vs 2012] - █▓▒░ Unlisted Retrograde Slacker
trackerninja.codeberg.page
808 is unmatched till today.
Enjoy.
spacedrone808 said:
Test was done with mod applied.
As for modern so called "108 mpix":
XIAOMI MI 11 ULTRA VS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808 [2021 vs 2012] - █▓▒░ Unlisted Retrograde Slacker
trackerninja.codeberg.page
808 is unmatched till today.
Enjoy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. Thanks. Cool stuff. Agree about the Sony Pro-i. Less computational play.
saved-j said:
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pixel quality wise Pro-i easily excels all these artificially inflated flagships, with fake mpixels and aquarel processing with artifacts.
spacedrone808 said:
Pixel quality wise Pro-i easily excels all these artificially inflated flagships, with fake mpixels and aquarel processing with artifacts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes agree. We get to choose our flavor of digital rendering by phone manufacturer. No different than Kodachrome, Extachrome, and Fuji film renderings in the day.