I wanted to know what is the best score anybody has had on a benchmarking app. My best score on AnTuTu is 146620. It doesn't have to be AnTuTu. It can be any benchmark you want.
AnTuTu: 168194- @Kevinkuensken
Geekbench 4 CPU: 1720/4217 - @rendler
3dmark slingshot es 3.1: 2601 - @kaotikb
Quadrant: 43253 - @rczrider
Tag me if you want to add a benchmark / top score.
I had a 145 but never got the screen shot
Antutu Scores
Just thought I'd throw it out there for us to post some antutu scores.
I haven't done anything with mine and got these scores which are pleasantly surprising.
Closed all apps and redone.
Let's see what you guys got...
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
My first one :
Sent from my ZTE A2017U using XDA-Developers mobile app
Updated op with new benchmarks and method for adding benchmarks.
I retested after I let some settings settle in here are the results:
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
I'm sure after the nougat update it will reach 150.000 just wish someone would start building a custom kernel
Technically I don't think I should be posting my scores here. I have the 128GB model. From what I've read about flash memory: two identical memory modules from the same factory, even same factory line the higher capacity will always perform marginally better.
So I'm thinking that's what is pushing my scores higher than normal.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all. ?
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
rendler said:
Technically I don't think I should be posting my scores here. I have the 128GB model. From what I've read about flash memory: two identical memory modules from the same factory, even same factory line the higher capacity will always perform marginally better.
So I'm thinking that's what is pushing my scores higher than normal.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see why that would affect CPU and GPU scores.
Well what is your score?
awsomjgp said:
I don't see why that would affect CPU and GPU scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AnTuTu one definitely has internal storage I/O tests included in the testing suite. Whereas Geekbench CPU doesn't.
Also doesn't the 128 come with 6gigs ram?
CampfireVibés said:
Well what is your score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this directed to me? My scores are in the pics in op.
rendler said:
The AnTuTu one definitely has internal storage I/O tests included in the testing suite. Whereas Geekbench CPU doesn't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be interesting if the 128 gig model has a different storage controller.
alom5 said:
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well what is your score then
---------- Post added at 10:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 AM ----------
alom5 said:
I've got the 128gb model as well, but it ain't doing anything spectacular on these scores. It does feel like it performs better than the 64gb i had before... Much snappier and no lag at all.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awsomjgp said:
Is this directed to me? My scores are in the pics in op.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, i forgot to hit the quote button, i meant to ask the guy with the 6gb variant thank you though.
S8ntsHaz3 said:
Also doesn't the 128 come with 6gigs ram?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two different models 128 can come with 4 or 6GB.
Sent from my ZTE A2017 using Tapatalk
Here is my antutu
Related
I run Quadrant Standard on XXLPB ROM, it give me the single core 1.2Ghz CPU result.
even it give me benchmark at ~3800
HOW COME ?
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Hehe ;-) That's right Bala. Usually the satisfaction that happens after the person running the benchmark faps off over the enormous benchmark scores they got
bala_gamer said:
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bala_gamer said:
Quadrant has not been updated for ages, also benchmarks proves nothing its only gives some personal satisfaction
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah your right...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
garekinokami said:
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is hands down the best response to a benchmark thread I've ever seen. Lol bravo!
Sent from inside a black hole.
well i got 3950 score.
what i notice was on the system info it shows a single core processor. however on gingerbread it does show a dual core processor.
Quadrant was kind of useful in the S1 days but with the S2 it's useless.
No matter what rom I've tried, the phone is fast. I don't need it to be any faster or an app to tell me how fast it is.
Sent from my GT-I9100T
Quadrant never even supported dual core CPU's.
Thread should be closed after Post No. 3.
garekinokami said:
Does a higher benchmark score help you make phone calls faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe, OP worry was if the room he's using supports 2 cors rather then 1 as it says in quadrant benchmark and the question was not about the result he received.
yes, it does.
很快
Sent from my GT-P7300 using Tapatalk
with what program i test my benchmark i see people post their benchmark score and i want to know what the prog that everybody use
You have many! Some of them are Antutu, Quadrant, GLbenchmark,...
You can find these in the Play Store. Have fun running some tests!
bubu23 said:
with what program i test my benchmark i see people post their benchmark score and i want to know what the prog that everybody use
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None they are pretty much pointless unless you are worried about high numbers and you have a huge ego because of it
Giving it some beans on my blue s3
adz63 said:
None they are pretty much pointless unless you are worried about high numbers and you have a huge ego because of it
Giving it some beans on my blue s3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like the words of someone that hasn't got the skill to successfully OC their phone and run a good benchmark. Nothing beats the feeling of spending hours researching and implementing a good setup and have it run really well in a benchmark test. Egos have nothing to do with it.
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
CF Benchmark about the best .
jje
Dinwoodie said:
That sounds like the words of someone that hasn't got the skill to successfully OC their phone and run a good benchmark. Nothing beats the feeling of spending hours researching and implementing a good setup and have it run really well in a benchmark test. Egos have nothing to do with it.
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know how easy it is to manipulate those numbers? Remember I flashed a rom on s2 with something tweaked so it got double the score it should have get
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
norpan111 said:
You know how easy it is to manipulate those numbers? Remember I flashed a rom on s2 with something tweaked so it got double the score it should have get
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You miss the point. How would you get the self satisfaction if you know you had 'cheated' to get the score?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
do these benchmark apps test quad core cpu's? last time i checked, they didnt even register the second core on the SII
And benchmarks are just a 'my penis is faaaar bigger than yours' statement
Dont waste your time "benchmarking" its pointless, unless you really really want to. Then stop, and find much more useful things to do to your phone..... like using the crap out of it. Benchmarking is for pre-teens.
Dinwoodie said:
You miss the point. How would you get the self satisfaction if you know you had 'cheated' to get the score?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of the score? I might as well throw two dices and get self satisfaction from high numbers.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
The point of the score is to see the phone perform at it's peak without it crashing. Throwing 2 dice doesn't guarantee 2 high numbers let alone 1. How is this a worthy comparison?
How does one end up comparing how fast a phone runs to the size of a penis?
Din
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
You are flogging a dead horse
A developer forum like this knows that benchmarks are irrelevant...you keep using it though, it seems to make you happy
Ok I'm new to the forum and flashing phones etc. So I'll run my train of thought.
Whenever I overclock a desktop computer and adjust any cpu related setting whether it be voltage or fsb and boot windows the only way I can tell if my overclock is stable is to stress test it and run a benchmark. How is this any different with phones? How am I meant to know if I am getting the best performance from my phone if I don't benchmark it after I tweak it?
Sent from my GT-I9300T using xda premium
I know benchmarks don't mean much - but I thought to run them on my S1 and S3 and compare - here are the results:
SGS 1 – GT-I9000
Nenamark2: 22.5 FPS
Nenamark1: 48 FPS
Antutu: 3060 Total score
Billion Counter: 51.35 secs
Vellamo: 590
SGS 3 – GT-I9300
Nenamark2: 58.9 FPS
Nenamark1: 60.0 FPS
Antutu: 12098 Total score
Billion Counter: 28.805secs
Vellamo: 2047
For pics/evidence: Unboxing & Initial impressions of the Samsung Galaxy S III – GT-i9300 – SGS3
TotallydubbedHD said:
I know benchmarks don't mean much - but I thought to run them on my S1 and S3 and compare - here are the results:
SGS 1 – GT-I9000
Nenamark2: 22.5 FPS
Nenamark1: 48 FPS
Antutu: 3060 Total score
Billion Counter: 51.35 secs
Vellamo: 590
SGS 3 – GT-I9300
Nenamark2: 58.9 FPS
Nenamark1: 60.0 FPS
Antutu: 12098 Total score
Billion Counter: 28.805secs
Vellamo: 2047
For pics/evidence: Unboxing & Initial impressions of the Samsung Galaxy S III – GT-i9300 – SGS3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice video, good seeing u here. Saw u a lot on darkys forums.
bbgt2 said:
Nice video, good seeing u here. Saw u a lot on darkys forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey man!
Thanks
I'm back on there, but this time an admin !
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
>60k?! (Boeffla Kernel)
What does the red Text mean?
~Yeaaah, deutsch
60k is very nice
I will install the kernel now too
Holy ****. I'm downloading Oxygen right now to give it a shot. That is on par with my 808 G4 with CM. I knew this was a better device haha
Wow! That's great
Are you sure your CPU and GPU were not over clocked during the benchmark?
Calvin2394 said:
Are you sure your CPU and GPU were not over clocked during the benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
63k score is overclocked
psychem said:
63k score is overclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting back to OOS for the kernel
Sent from my OnePlus X using Tapatalk
Little OC and some my custom settings.
Hydrogen os overclocked.
Keep dreaming if you think its better than any 808 device
Aleycat said:
Keep dreaming if you think its better than any 808 device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to agree tho. To say it's on par with a superior hardware is ridicule but 800 was a good chipset tho. 808 with a good kernel and clocking will over perform as well. Its just simply tuning
Aleycat said:
Keep dreaming if you think its better than any 808 device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously it isnt better than a Snapdragon 808, but still we got the same level as a 808 with stock settings, even a bit more.
Keep dreaming if you can't hold that the OPX is a really good device haters.
aiyoju said:
but still we got the same level as a 808 with stock settings, even a bit more.
Keep dreaming if you can't hold that the OPX is a really good device haters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same level??
No, a 808 gets about 55k in Antutu v5, while the OPX gets max. 45k (stock settings).
SlanDev said:
The same level??
No, a 808 gets about 55k in Antutu v5, while the OPX gets max. 45k (stock settings).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think what he meant was with this kernel we got a score that is close to an 808 stock setting. Loving opx with all these dev support
SlanDev said:
The same level??
No, a 808 gets about 55k in Antutu v5, while the OPX gets max. 45k (stock settings).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my phone was fully stock,filled with apps and while screen recorder was running and it managed 49k
dont believe me?
here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEL2eaEyrnc
Thanasis st said:
my phone was fully stock,filled with apps and while screen recorder was running and it managed 49k
dont believe me?
here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEL2eaEyrnc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is Antutu 6. In Antutu 5, 50k is a lot more than in v6.
SlanDev said:
This is Antutu 6. In Antutu 5, 50k is a lot more than in v6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu 6 and Antutu 5,whatever man,they are just numbers,the phone is fast and that's what is important...3gb of ram and 801 are great for 250€
Can anybody post geekbenchmark results please ?
Hey.. I just moved from miui9 to ViperOS. I ran antutu benchmark and I scored only 48k. Why it is so low? Everyone is scoring at least 60k.
ReDuXX528 said:
Hey.. I just moved from miui9 to ViperOS. I ran antutu benchmark and I scored only 48k. Why it is so low? Everyone is scoring at least 60k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Close background apps and make sure phone is not warm when you starting benchmark, besides performance differs from ROM to ROM.
if you want better benchmark, go get MTK version dude... you'll be happy
good luck
ReDuXX528 said:
Hey.. I just moved from miui9 to ViperOS. I ran antutu benchmark and I scored only 48k. Why it is so low? Everyone is scoring at least 60k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
welp, we using the same ROM , i got 64K+ at 22% battery power.
Turned off wifi and cleared all background apps.
Benchmarks these days don't exactly reflect overall day to day performance. So, you shouldn't be worry too much.
aabenroi said:
if you want better benchmark, go get MTK version dude... you'll be happy
good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance is ok and I'm just asking because im curious.
k3lcior said:
Close background apps and make sure phone is not warm when you starting benchmark, besides performance differs from ROM to ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set governor to performance and closed all apps. Kinda weird
aabenroi said:
if you want better benchmark, go get MTK version dude... you'll be happy
good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much this. ^^
If you buy this device to check benchmarks or what?
sachin n said:
Pretty much this. ^^
If you buy this device to check benchmarks or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cant say that scoring almost 15k points less than my phone should on benchmark is a normal thing ;p
ReDuXX528 said:
You cant say that scoring almost 15k points less than my phone should on benchmark is a normal thing ;p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is normal if you are using custom ROM and custom kernel with some custom performance profiles.
ReDuXX528 said:
You cant say that scoring almost 15k points less than my phone should on benchmark is a normal thing ;p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well for me it's better to score 10k benchmark, but have no performance issues
than score amazing 90k but lots of heat, throttle and lags issue...