Related
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what abou AOKP rom ?
AOKP bricks my phone.
Installed slimbean after this, its really good and antutu is 4100 but i ram is the same as cyanogen
com975 said:
Okay, this is going to help people who is after performance.
No, scripts have been used for any of these tests. All tests has no other applications running then settings. Gapps is installed too.
Processor is clocked at 1GHZ at ON DEMAND.
Cyanogenmod 10 ROM SIZE IS 150MB (4.1.2 June the 2nd update):
Antutu Benchmark: 3535
Free RAM: 175mb
Note: Very good ROM. Stable and fast.
SlimBean (Rom Size 85MB) Using 17may 2013 update :
Antutu Benchmark: 4102
Free RAM: 232mb
Note: DPI is wierd, text is so small and the performance tab in the settings is broken (incompatiable with the rom). Besides that ROM is actullay stable and noticeablly fast and quick to boot up.
PacMan (Rom Size 145mb) 27.may 2013 update:
Antutu BenchMark: 3954
Free RAM: 206mb
Note: Pretty unstable and slow takes, like 10minutes to find program in Google Play. Avoid it if possible. Settings is also wierd.
Conclusion: SLIM BEAN is the best! Just find some way to fix the text thing and it will be the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did it too before but I have tested rooted official firmwares and V20D was the best, and not Slim Bean.
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
com975 said:
V20D gives me 100mb. It's not better then SlimBean for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excatly
caiejay said:
Just because it gives less ram doesnt mean its worse infact v20D is the best no lag in games and apps muuuch better
Sent from my LG-P700 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. But for me, SlimBean is better. But I am using V10K now. More Ram and better benchmarks.
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Gusta_HR said:
v10k is best rom so far for our device. Im heavy user, mostly internet browsing , lots of texting, lots of calls, twitter, charging my phone sometimes twice a day...
I get flashed every rom found here, but i always restore my v10k nandroid backup after some time.. Thats my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
kristijan505 said:
Im using CM10 because of Gandalf kernels 1.3 GHz, althrough im using it on 1190 MHz with SMARTASSV2 Governor, zRam, Allow purging of assets and Krenel samepage merging in memory management. With these settings my phone is faster in games like Subway Surf (I play it with no laggs at all)
Zdravo Gusta_HR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Gusta_HR said:
If your phone become unstable, if reboots occured without any visible reason, you fried your cpu. you can't speed up your system with overclocked cpu, but you can damage your phone with that. More RAM installed in our device will significantly speed up system overall. Rest is just painfull placebo effect.
Before lg l7 i got Samsung Galaxy S + (plus) .. an 1.4 ghz clocked variant of famous Samsung galaxy S clocked "only" at 1.0 Ghz. And guess what?? I kept phone underclocked @ 1.0 Ghz working just fine and draining less batterry.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know about that but I have got Galaxy 3 before L7 and I have overclocked it from 667MHz to 1300MHz with no problems like unstable phone, rebooting or anything else but games were a lot less laggy.
Hey guys,
Are there any Galaxy Mega users going back to the Note 2? I went back after using the Mega 6.3 for around 2 weeks and I gotta tell ya, I'm happy I went back.
The Mega feels so slow and laggy, I'm constantly finding myself having to clear the RAM and close all tasks just to speed things up.
Swiping left to right always have a slight lag, opening the app draw has lag, heck even returning via home button is laggy. Exiting Apps like the browser seems to drop the animation of exiting it down to like 20fps.
Everything just feels like it stutters and lags, the phone feels like it's constantly crawling and the "pinch-in" lag is back too.
Don't get me wrong I love this phone, mostly for it size but in no way is it a bad phone. But I am slightly disappointed a phone with a processor that has similar instructions A15 isn't 100% smooth.
I've seen alot of you guy say you have a buttery smooth Mega, I wish my was the same, but it's far from buttery.
All in all, I'm happy I went back to the Galaxy Note 2, it feels so much faster and smoother.
just my few pennies.
P.S - Forgot my username and email address so had to make a new acount, doh!
Ten Quid said:
Hey guys,
Are there any Galaxy Mega users going back to the Note 2? I went back after using the Mega 6.3 for around 2 weeks and I gotta tenotificationappy I went back.
The Mega feels so slow and laggy, I'm constantly finding myself having to clear the RAM and close all tasks just to speed things up.
Swiping left to right always have a slight lag, opening the app draw has lag, heck even returning via home button is laggy. Exiting Apps like the browser seems to drop the animation of exiting it down to like 20fps.
Everything just feels like it stutters and lags, the phone feels like it's constantly crawling and the "pinch-in" lag is back too.
Don't get me wrong I love this phone, mostly for it size but in no way is it a bad phone. But I am slightly disappointed a phone with a processor that has similar instructions A15 isn't 100% smooth.
I've seen alot of you guy say you have a buttery smooth Mega, I wish my was the same, but it's far from buttery.
All in all, I'm happy I went back to the Galaxy Note 2, it feels so much faster and smoother.
just my few pennies.
P.S - Forgot my username and email address so had to make a new acount, doh!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear you. The only slowness I am experiencing is the android notification bar. But its getting progressively worse. I disabled all animations and it sped the notification for a little but but now it's slow again. The device is very snappy but the ridiculously slow notification bar swipe is unacceptable. I am waiting for the Note 3 now......
sorry to hear you are having poor performance. Again I've only experienced iit when swyping down on the notification bar.
Hmmm I've been playing with my mega a week. I should of put that better ha .
It is a bit laggy n jerky now and again. But for £300 I'm really impressed and it exceeds my needs. Especially with screen size, design and how slim it is.
I'm selling my note 2 on eBay. And staying with the mega 6.3.
numbnutsuk said:
Hmmm I've been playing with my mega a week. I should of put that better ha .
It is a bit laggy n jerky now and again. But for £300 I'm really impressed and it exceeds my needs. Especially with screen size, design and how slim it is.
I'm selling my note 2 on eBay. And staying with the mega 6.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm positive that a software update will fix the lags. I feel like Samsung rushed the software for the Mega 6.3 that's why it's not that optimized for the processor.
I own both Note II and Mega 6.3 I9205. The slowdown you mentioned has got something to do with samsung launcher and the rom itself. Update
the ROM to the latest version available. I think that was XXUAMG4 or better yet download the customized one available in this forum (android development). The mega launcher was entirely different from GS4 and Note2. It support landscape mode and the built-in widget resizes accordingly.
I think this was taken from touchwiz tablets. Try to use Nova Launcher instead, then see if you still experience noticeable slowdowns. My mega 6.3 is butter-smooth with Nova launcher. I have never experienced any slowdowns at all, and will never go back to samsung's laggy default laucher. Also try to enable "Force GPU rendering" in the Developer's Section settings. Do not under-estimate power of Snapdragon 400 vs Exynos 4212. It's a hell lot faster in FPU. In fact in most benchmark, its faster than note 2 specially the graphics department. I confirmed this using the latest 3DMark. Dual-core vs quad-core does not make sense anymore. The CPU architecture is what really matters.
Also, the 1.5GB ram is more than enough for daily tablet/phone use. That includes gaming. My Nexus 7 is very fast running JB 4.3 with only 1GB of ram. My Windows 7 Pro netbook, which am using right now, only comes with 1GB of ram but still perform quite decently in multitasking considering that Windows 7 has got more bloatwares in it that Android JB and IOS combined.
I also use Nova Launcher and never had any slowdowns. I find my Mega smoother than my Nexus 7 and my original Note on custom ROM.
jtrakx said:
I own both Note II and Mega 6.3 I9205. The slowdown you mentioned has got something to do with samsung launcher and the rom itself. Update
the ROM to the latest version available. I think that was XXUAMG4 or better yet download the customized one available in this forum (android development). The mega launcher was entirely different from GS4 and Note2. It support landscape mode and the built-in widget resizes accordingly.
I think this was taken from touchwiz tablets. Try to use Nova Launcher instead, then see if you still experience noticeable slowdowns. My mega 6.3 is butter-smooth with Nova launcher. I have never experienced any slowdowns at all, and will never go back to samsung's laggy default laucher. Also try to enable "Force GPU rendering" in the Developer's Section settings. Do not under-estimate power of Snapdragon 400 vs Exynos 4212. It's a hell lot faster in FPU. In fact in most benchmark, its faster than note 2 specially the graphics department. I confirmed this using the latest 3DMark. Dual-core vs quad-core does not make sense anymore. The CPU architecture is what really matters.
Also, the 1.5GB ram is more than enough for daily tablet/phone use. That includes gaming. My Nexus 7 is very fast running JB 4.3 with only 1GB of ram. My Windows 7 Pro netbook, which am using right now, only comes with 1GB of ram but still perform quite decently in multitasking considering that Windows 7 has got more bloatwares in it that Android JB and IOS combined.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'll have to update it then because right now, whether it's the launcher or ROM it's ruining the experience.
I tried Nova Launcher and it was equally as bad if not worse the Touchwiz, it was still jerky and laggy.
And I agree, the benchmarks for the Snapdragon 400 are great and beat the Exynos 4 alot, but for me personally at the moment in terms of everyday use the Note 2's performance is so much better and smooth. I'd really like to keep the Mega, but unless the performance improves dramatically within a new update then I'll be keeping the Note 2. I'll try a custom ROM and the latest update, fingers crossed.
I experienced the slow notification bar and I was running ADW launcher. I disabled animations and it still was slow. I returned my Mega because of this. It was a total deal breaker.
Yes your right it lags sometimes
But thats why I am waiting CM team hopefully or anyone to build AOKP or CM or AOSP
When it reaches the mega it will be awesome
Sent from my GT-I9200 using xda app-developers app
I have been thinking about going back, but i think i'm gonna sit it out till the Note III gets released.
The Mega has it's slow points now but i trust in samsung fixing some in the upcomming updates.
SquirtingCherry said:
I have been thinking about going back, but i think i'm gonna sit it out till the Note III gets released.
The Mega has it's slow points now but i trust in samsung fixing some in the upcomming updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And maybe CM coming over on the big screen ^^
I don't know exactly why some mega 6.3 owners experienced some significant slowdowns.
Maybe because of the ff:
1. Outdated ROM. Try to install the latest available rom even if its not for your country (XXUAMG4).
2. Stock launcher from samsung. Use Nova launcher or any other payware launcher of your choice.
3. Use Seeder program. I may help speed things up.
4. Flash stock kernel after rooting and stop using vcore2 kernel
5. You may have a faulty slow microSD.
6. Some other apps you have installed maybe affecting your otherwise speedy JB 4.2.2
So.
I got an update for my s6 edge from at&t a few days ago. And I installed it. And I was curious to know if there was a better performance so today I ran another AnTuTu test.... And I got a lower score than before updating android.
I already cleaned up my cache partition, I disabled unnecessary apps, I killed other unnecessary apps and services running in the background so now I have 1 GB free. And I still have same score.
68000s on android 5.0.1
57000s on android 5.0.2
Why.....?
Anyone else noticed the same on their phone?
What else could I do to improve my score again?
Notes: I'm using stock rom. I will add screenshots to the post.
I tought every s6 was 5.0.2 out of the box I didn't know they came in some countries with 5.0.1
marcochapita said:
I tought every s6 was 5.0.2 out of the box I didn't know they came in some countries with 5.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it depends when did you buy it. I got mine 3 days after release. I think there was no 5.0.2 from at&t at that time
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Lior84 said:
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps you could try one of the lollipop versions. They (both aosp and Omni) are really stable. If you however need 3G I would suggest the aosp rom.
There's no harm in trying them out. If you still feel that they lag to much you can always go back to stock.
I've been running the aosp rom on my wifi tab for some time now and it performs pretty great actually.
Pretty great you mean responsive? Because I use omni 4.4.2 and it's laggy no matter what I do.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Lior84 said:
Pretty great you mean responsive? Because I use omni 4.4.2 and it's laggy no matter what I do.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, responsive. I did overclock it to 1400mhz but it's running stable. Only youtube is sometimes not the best when running 720p videos.
Not responsive :/
Is it smooth when using chrome, scrolling and doing other activities?
Tell me the best settings to get it fast with Lollipop.
P.S: i suggest the cm10.2 ROM with tabletUI if you want smooth scrolling and graphics.
Mast3rC22 said:
Is it smooth when using chrome, scrolling and doing other activities?
Tell me the best settings to get it fast with Lollipop.
P.S: i suggest the cm10.2 ROM with tabletUI if you want smooth scrolling and graphics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can only speak from my experience with the aosp rom but scrolling in Chrome is smooth, I'm also using Nova Launcher and it is overclocked to 1400 mhz. Please don't expect miracles from this old device that samsung gave up on one ago. It runs 5.1.1 as smooth as it can. Also don't expect any hard core gaming and youtube will sometimes have issues. If all these things are deal-breakers then stay with whatever you have now. I wrote this from my own experience with my own tab. My father has the same one else only that one is bone stock. Touch wiz and everything with only a handful of apps installed. And yes it runs smooth and has less "issues" but it's running 4.0.4... I hope my explanation helps you make an informed decision.
Lior84 said:
There are any disadvantages to go back to ice cream sandwich 4.0 version? Now I have custom 4.4.2 and it is laggy no matter what.
P7500
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was considering the same. I was on 4.4 omni, seemed laggy. Flashed stock ICS, which did seem snappy but still bloated. I thought I'd give AOSP 5.1 a go. Haven't over clocked anything and its definitely smoother than 4.4 omni. Very compact ROM, I installed gapps and that only set google play. Currently tested WiFi and GPS and they're working. Chrome is smooth and running flash smoothly. Auto detected resolution on YouTube.com is smooth. Haven't tried YouTube app as yet. I normally use tubemate anyway. This tab will always have trouble playing 1080p vid. Max I go now is 720. Tried and its working fine using mxplayer. 5.1 is still in social testing but the bugs are slowly being fixed. I was on ICS for a long time as it performed well. Having experienced the same with 4.4 and now upgrading to this rom , I'm happy with how smooth and responsive it is. Ticks the boxes.
My main concern is lags. I run omni 4.4 on with nova and the response is disappointing.
Most of the time, my son use it to watch movies, YouTube and some games but nothing really hard. When I take it to do some stuff on it, the lags just giving me crazy. I know that the main problem is lack of RAM but hey, with 4.0.4 it works OK.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda premium
Going back does mean stability. The way I look at it though is you can only put so much into a mini, but it will always be a mini, not a Ferrari. Lollipop seems to work OK but its stretching the capability of this tab. For me with minor tweaks its going OK. A goto software always on all my droids is Greenify. It kills all the apps lingering in the background and stops them from opening again unless I open them. Try it out, you need all the ram you can get outta these older tabs. With the paid version it also kills system apps like google play services which is a big ram hog. I guess the only way you'll make your mind up is give ICS a go for a few days then try LP and see what you think.
A lollipop ROM might be smoother, if there would be the "Performance" menu in the settings app (like CM12).
If anyone has got any cyanogenmod ROM, i suggest these settings:
CPU governor:
• Intellidemand/ondemand: The CPU will increase the frequency when needed. It's default in many kernels. I really suggest that, because the device will be very stable (and smooth) and the battery life will be quite good :good: ;
• Performance: The CPU frequency will be set to max setting;
• Powersave: The CPU frequency will be set to minimum setting.
CPU min frequency: 150mhz (max. 200mhz)
CPU max frequency: overclock to 1400Mhz (do not overclock to 1.5 or 1.6ghz, the cpu will freeze and might be damaged)
I/O scheduler: deadline
zRam: 18%
Resources clean: on
KSM: on
PS: Enable "Set on boot" to each menu.
Sorry for the worst english ever.
I like decatf's 5.1 AOSP rom. He put a lot of work into creating a wrapper for hwcomposer which does a better job translating some of the newer rendering apis to work with the ancient ics binary Nvidia video driver blobs. That's why videos and animations are much smoother on his rom than the alternatives and why you don't get that weird "lightning bolt" rendering effect that's been around since pershoot's cyanogen jelly bean roms. He also implemented an audio driver wrapper as well in the same vein. And if you use his TWRP version, you can format /cache and /data to use f2fs, which definitely helps with disk I/O. He even ported over Multirom so you can dual-boot, but alas, it doesn't boot Ice Cream Sandwich roms at the moment.
It's the best modern rom thus far for the original Tab 10.1. Other than proper modern and native Nvidia drivers updated for Lollipop, the only thing really holding back the original 10.1 at this point is the Tegra 2's lack of NEON support. But there's nothing decatf can do about that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
Hello. First - sorry for very bad english. I dont been here long time. I have few questions, bcs I am curious.
I used before serious PC machines with Windows 2008 r2 Servers. Also Cent OS. So I am not so big Android expert but I know few things. I also used maybe 20 windows mobile phones before.
So I am limited with lang but I will try to explain problems. I will be little android hater. I haved HTC Tytn 2 for years. He haved 128 MB rams and with some lite/custom roms he run 40 apps without lag on Windows Mobile 6.1
Okay. My favourite Windows OS died so I must move on Android. Okay Samsung Touch Wiz / Android is cool experience. But only UI. I haved s2/s3mini/s3/s3 neo (at this moment)/s4 mini.
So why android suck ? On s2 we have android 2.3.6 (great) and mostly 4.1.2. First work incredible (so much free ram + older apps) nad 4.1.2 work great until last days. I mean today you cant run 3 apps and android close previous apps. Boring. 1 gb ram for what ?! Why Android consume so much ram ? For what ? Okay Android is cool, nice UI, but 1 gb on nothing ?!?! Okay. I understand foreground/background/cached process. I mean no matter how much new device you have.
RAM kill you !!! Later I buy s3 with quad - he suck. He consume more ram. Btw I root all devices and use scripts to debloat and I also alone remove apps/services. S3 is nice phone if you want to run 2-3 modern apps.
Cached process sucks. They slow down phones like hell. Okay I sold bad s3 and buy s4 mini.
Great phone 1.5 gb ram, solid dual core.... but we actually have 1.35 ram and 906 MB used on stock rom. Lol. I make serious debloat on 4.2.2 (brazilian) bcs stupid Samsung dont allow downgrade from even worse 4.4.2.
So after very serious debloat, scripts and lot of learning I make my best result. 312 MB ram USED from 1350 MB.
Super fast experience. I run 24 apps instant on stock debloated rom. I googled every stupid process. I removed almost everything expect contacts/sms/gallery.... I haved 9 icons. Only 5 active process. Super fast.
But after some time superamoled lose colors (i used him all day like PC) and my eyes was hurted so much. So I buy new s3 neo.
1.5 GB ram (1.35 available). On stock (no provider) rom he use 800 MB. From 1.35 GB. After 2 apps he is sooooooo super slow. And this is "smartphone" ?!?!?!? I cant run few stupid apps ? Bcs of lack of ram ?
Okay I modified script from s4 mini from Jelly Bean and I removed everything on Kit Kat. Result is 512 MB used from 1350. Okay. Not so bad.
I also save 20 GB old apps. They consume much less memory. So I installed same apps like on s4 mini with 4.2.2.
On s3 Neo with 4.4.2 they consume much moreeeeeeeee ram. Phone is super fast until you run browser + 2-3 apps. After that ram move on 1 GB used and he never user 0.35 GB. Limit is 1.35 GB.
So I am curious what is hell wrong with android ? If I dont have money to buy device with 3 GB ram I am in serious trouble to run smothly few android apps.
So from my personal experience expect pure CPU power, even Windows Mobile 6.1 with 128 MB ram do tasks lot better than android with 1.5 GB ram. Even my Tytn 2 run 30 much serious apps then simple android on 128 mb ram with no problem.
Every year we got new devices, new Android OS and more slower phones. I mean come on. For what android spend all my ram (expect stupid cashing) and make phone damn slow for every simple multitasking with few apps ?!?!
Only 2 android os what was good are : S2 with old 2.3.6 (old apps - blazing fast) and s4 mini 4.2.2 (serious debloat).
With my last phone s3 neo I am disapointed. He consume damn so much ram even if he is serious debloated (500 ram of 1350 usage). After 3 apps he slow down. For me is Android huge fail.
So I want to move on on Windows Phone. I always used HTC WM and Samsung Android.
I dont care for options and new os. I want to run super smooth browser, irc, image browser, badoo and to listen YT. That is all. So can someone reccomend me any newer phone (not new) what can do few simple tasks without lag ? Even HTC Tytn 2 work better than s3 neo (expect Popcorn movies - hardware). I really need new platform and good multitasking.
And why the hell Samsung make so good and bad phones in ssme time ? Amoled is best, specs are good but android sucks in every sence. Multitasking ZERO. Ram consumption WORST, performance downgrade after few even older apps HUGE.
I like s3 neo like phone. But I want simple stock os with 1 GB ram free ! Not to fill ram with 2 stupid apps. I dont have money for galaxy s5/s6. Android like OS on MY PERSONAL NOOB oppinion is worst experience.
Which phone to buy and what about Windows Phone ? WP look bad (ugly) but if he is half good like WM I will change OS. I only want multitaking sith minimal 10 apps running without problem.