Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Moto G5 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Moto G5 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not good. Gets a little weird.
Moto G5 takes good shots, I compared it to the Moto G4 and it's way more sharp. Contrast is ok. Low light, not bad for the price. Struggles to focus sometimes though. I also compared it to the G4 plus, and the latter is much better, you can really see the difference.
So, to sum it up, pretty decent camera for the price.
The pictures it takes are okay for an inexpensive phone, but the images are not particularly sharp, and the HDR mode isn't very natural looking.
Clicking burst shots
MultiPDev said:
Moto G5 takes good shots, I compared it to the Moto G4 and it's way more sharp. Contrast is ok. Low light, not bad for the price. Struggles to focus sometimes though. I also compared it to the G4 plus, and the latter is much better, you can really see the difference.
So, to sum it up, pretty decent camera for the price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clickung burst shots by clicking volume down continues ly
To be honest, I'm not disappointed, but they could've done better. With the G6 Play. Because my G5, is better in every way, so at the end of the day, whats the point of a G6 Play?
The camera shots are decent for a cheap phone (got it for £35 with speaker issues, fixed already =] ) the camera is exactly the same as the G6 Play if not better. The colours look more natural, sharp and clear on the 1080p IPS display, and the device feels more premium due to the metal backplate.
Related
You're beautiful and everyone knows it. That's why you take selfies. Rate this thread to express how the front-facing camera of the Moto G5 performs. A higher rating indicates that the front camera produces fantastic results consistently.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
You're beautiful and everyone knows it. That's why you take selfies. Rate this thread to express how the front-facing camera of the Moto G5 performs. A higher rating indicates that the front camera produces fantastic results consistently.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its OK.
I can compare with Huawei P9 Lite, and Moto g5 shoots much better selfies.
I Think that is good. Nothing from other Worlds.
Wide angular shot. Average colours and good definition at daylight, but gets very blurry and noisy in interiors -even when there is good light-. I know this isnt related with the camera quality, but it gets somewhat slow when using face-filters in Snapchat and Instagram. Overall, i think its a good camera, but it has its flaws.
I leave here an example of interior selfie with movement. If you zoom in, you can see the noise at the background wall, the blurry hand, and the low quality texture/ low definition in the gray pullover and hair.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Sony Xperia XA1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
AF is inaccurate at best (always seems to back-focus). Too much sharpening applied to the image files. Macro (close-up) performance is abysmal, cannot focus close at all. Colours, contrast, speed, dedicated shutter button, and other features are all quite good though. It's mostly better than my OnePlus One, but for close-ups the One beats it soundly.
With Macro you need to find the right distance to get clear pictures, same goes with any camera
Set with manual focus to minimum. It simply doesn't have a close minimum focus distance. It's just not designed for closeups.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor 8 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Photo quality is not exceptional but it's not bad either.
Photo quality is flat out amazing.
Mind-blowing output. Day by day my love towards my device increasing.
As expected really good.
exceptionally well. photos are just too good for a smartphone level
photo quality is really good.
extraordinary good.
Wide aperture mode is fantastic.
Folks,post some pictures in full resolution.I will post later today.For me,camera is good but Honor 9 and P10 have a better cameras.
Can't get blur effect in aperture or portrait mode after oreo update. Also image quality have decreased. Very poor from Huawei development team.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Moto E4 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The camera is AWESOME if you use it correctly. It isn't intuitive, I will admit, but once you figure it out it is a breeze to take pictures worthy of a frame.
it doesnt perform well in low_light but good photos overall in a price vs quality comparison but certainly not a phone specifically for photography
Sent from my woods_f using XDA Labs
i've been pleasantly surprised with how good it looks in good lighting. massive upgrade over the moto e2, which was my wife's previous phone.
I think the camera is pretty average. Not bad, not terrible though. Definitely not super good in low light at all, but good brightness and you can get a little bit of quality out of it. 3/5
For the cost of this phone, I'd say the camera is fantastic...
wobedraggled said:
For the cost of this phone, I'd say the camera is fantastic...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, sometimes it's oversaturated, but it produces nice colour in overall.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Generally photo results are great, unless for:
1. HDR is less realistic, I would say same HDR quality with my 4 yo Redmi phone.
2. AI mode in direct sunlight will destroy skin tone, I should turn it off several times.
3. Bokeh effect from main back cameras is sometimes struggling to isolate objects.
For comparison, MiA1 produces better bokeh, I think because it used zoom lense which brings more natural looks (you never get bokeh on wide lenses in DSLR, right?)