Related
So, do you think samsung will ever update these devices to ice cream sandwich? Would anyone care enough to try to make a port? I don't have this device yet but I plan to get the 5 inch one for christmas and no ice cream sandwich won't stop me from getting it but I was just curious. Thanks!
I honestly don't expect Samsung to update these to ICS(but here's to hoping). We may see a port sometime though(I'm personally waiting for someone to port cyanogenmod to it, so that I can do some work with porting)
nyanyan: you might check your time zone setting here, your clock looks off.
nyanyan said:
I honestly don't expect Samsung to update these to ICS(but here's to hoping). We may see a port sometime though(I'm personally waiting for someone to port cyanogenmod to it, so that I can do some work with porting)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tcat007 said:
nyanyan: you might check your time zone setting here, your clock looks off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, on my side, it doesn't look off at all...
I hope someone makes a port for this right now I'm using a Ice Cream Launcher instead of the built in Launcher.
Not to get off the topic too much...but does anyone know specific time frame Sammy will update the players so we can access Media Hub?
last i read there would be an "update in the future"....boo!
Curious, I don't have a Samsung TV (but may buy one soon), how is "Media Hub" different than "Smart View" (that's on these players)?
ICS?
I hope someone makes a port for this right now. Anyone had news?
5" with ICS ..
I bought one and this is very great but ICS is cooool...
Samsung G.Wifi + 1ghz + 5" + ICS.. =
Why won't they update it? They're a month old!
-sandro- said:
Why won't they update it? They're a month old!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I don't have high hopes for ICS. The "Y" in the device name YP-G70 means "(Young) – These are entry models or strategic models for emerging markets or a younger audience more sensitive to price."
See more about the naming scheme here http://www.androidguys.com/2011/08/24/samsung-debuts-galaxy-products-naming-convention-eve-ifa/ .
I think Samsung will put their ICS effort on other "high-end" devices first.
WT Ho said:
Actually I don't have high hopes for ICS. The "Y" in the device name YP-G70 means "(Young) – These are entry models or strategic models for emerging markets or a younger audience more sensitive to price."
See more about the naming scheme here http://www.androidguys.com/2011/08/24/samsung-debuts-galaxy-products-naming-convention-eve-ifa/ .
I think Samsung will put their ICS effort on other "high-end" devices first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The YP series existed a long time ago as YEPP (young, energetic, passionate, person)because it is the model code for the mp3 players for samsung. it is not obligated to be a young audience. Take the samsung p3 for exemple (YP-P3) which is released in 2007 or 2008 (way before the article.) I think they will maybe release it if they release it to the original galaxy s (they have the same hardware capabilities.)Otherwise we can always wait for some custom roms. (CM9 ) And I want to know why people prefer 5.0 to the 4.0? (There's not enough talk about the 4.0 as I have one.)
media hub is the acess point for movies, tv shows, etc for samsung mobile devices...i have several movies and shows i would love to watch on the player while traveling but i dont think we have access yet without an OTA.
Sent from my Slider SL101 using xda premium
zaclimon said:
And I want to know why people prefer 5.0 to the 4.0? (There's not enough talk about the 4.0 as I have one.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree! I mean, I would think the 4" would be more popular, since it can easily fit in pocket, but the screen is still plenty big!
Really too bad because I have a feeling all development towards roms is going to go to the 5.0, and not the 4.0 (not sure if a 5.0 rom would work on a 4.0).
Concerning ICS, kinda doubt it since it took them almost a year to update it to gingerbread!
Of course, maybe they will, but by that time, jellybean will be the new kid on the block, lol!
zaclimon said:
And I want to know why people prefer 5.0 to the 4.0? (There's not enough talk about the 4.0 as I have one.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought the 5.0 because it is pretty much the biggest possible size that I can still hold it with one hand. If you are commuting on train STANDING, you need to grab the hand rail using the other hand. Galaxy tab or iPad are way too big to use this way. For me, 4.0 is too small, I may just go with some newer super phone with 4 inch+ screen. Actually the new Galaxy Note is interesting.
iJimaniac said:
I agree! I mean, I would think the 4" would be more popular, since it can easily fit in pocket, but the screen is still plenty big!
Really too bad because I have a feeling all development towards roms is going to go to the 5.0, and not the 4.0 (not sure if a 5.0 rom would work on a 4.0).
Concerning ICS, kinda doubt it since it took them almost a year to update it to gingerbread!
Of course, maybe they will, but by that time, jellybean will be the new kid on the block, lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said there's always the option for the custom rom but as you said all the developpement will go to the 5.0. As you had probably saw on ABI there a custom rom and kernel for the internationnal 4.0 (this is a great beginning I think.) I did some tests and post a little review on the thread. It is great for a first custom rom!
Yup, just saw that, hope it will get things rolling! Wonder how hard it would be to get it running on U.S version...
Only now do I see I should have payed a little extra for importing a international version instead of U.S. version, Ah well.
zaclimon said:
(. As you had probably saw on ABI there a custom rom and kernel for the internationnal 4.0 (this is a great beginning I think.) I did some tests and post a little review on the thread. It is great for a first custom rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a link? I wonder what is ABI .
WT Ho said:
Do you have a link? I wonder what is ABI .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ABI is Anything but ipod which it's talking about anything but ipod actually. The link for the firmware and kernel is there.
http://www.anythingbutipod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=66820
-sandro- said:
Why won't they update it? They're a month old!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're more that one month old in some parts of the world.
And they already upgraded it from froyo to gingerbread so an ICS might not come right now (if it ever comes).
I hope I'm wrong, just having bought mine to replace an ipod touch.
I just hope there wil be at least a cyanogen or other custom rom with ICS.
WT Ho said:
Actually I don't have high hopes for ICS. The "Y" in the device name YP-G70 means "(Young) – These are entry models or strategic models for emerging markets or a younger audience more sensitive to price."
See more about the naming scheme here http://www.androidguys.com/2011/08/24/samsung-debuts-galaxy-products-naming-convention-eve-ifa/ .
I think Samsung will put their ICS effort on other "high-end" devices first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "Y" is in the model number, not the device name. I have a YP-G70 and the device name is Samsung Galaxy "S" WiFi 5.0
Hi,
I'm willing to buy a new Android phone.
I'm not so excited about the prices of current flagships models (S3, S4, Nexus, HTC One, etc.) but I like their hardware (obviously!).
About one month ago I discovered a whole bunch of Android phones from China. Their specs are amazing (beside the processors, MTKXXXX).
What I'm asking here is:
is there a phone from these China makers which has:
- a decent processor (not MTK series)
- current flagship phones hardware (1-2gb ram, quad core processor, decent front/back camera, various sensors, etc.)
- availability outside China (I'm from Italy)
- support for custom roms (like Cyanogenmod or any AOSP/AOKP)
?
Thank you
Take a look at Oppo, Meizu and the like. They have great specs and some models are made not only for China but for the rest of the world as well.
cippa lippa said:
thanks would like to see them...so why people buy sony,htc ecc yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Biggest reason that most don't buy those phones is there is no trust of knock off devices.
OP you may find roms for them on other sites but you will not find any here.
Wayne Tech S-III
cippa lippa said:
thanks would like to see them...so why people buy sony,htc ecc yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also, not all of the Chinese smartphones are intended for external market.
Thank you for your answers.
I've asked this question because I'm interested in having a decent piece of hardware (I don't care if it's a knockoff of another phone or if it has original design) AND a ROM that is not the original one. I've read they're full of chinese bloatware and bugs, so the combination I'm looking for is a decent hardware and a rom made by other developers than chinese one (a cyanogenmod?)
But if there is no support here at XDA for any of these phones I think it's not worth to buy any one of those phones.
Bootlaoder language written in chinese
Hi,
I wanted to install ROM but after putting the tablet in bootloader mode, I discovered the language is Chinese. I took picture and is attached here. Any help interpreting or changing to English? This is just frustrating.
It one of those generic tablets made by Speed. The model is MB-Z5S.
Hi,
I'm going to be buying a Samsung S2 for a family member as a backup phone but want to put CynanogenMod on it and change the pit size... but the variants of S2 are confusing, the family member currently has a Samsung S2 9100G and has http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/rom-cyanogenmod-12-t2955551 installed.
I have the option of buying a cheap working phone from someone I know but it is an 9100 model, one of their original batch, is this compatible with the ROM and pit files from above?
Or should I pass on buying it and instead get an 9100G? What other ones are ok and obviously work in the UK?
Hyflex said:
Hi,
I'm going to be buying a Samsung S2 for a family member as a backup phone but want to put CynanogenMod on it and change the pit size... but the variants of S2 are confusing, the family member currently has a Samsung S2 9100G and has http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/rom-cyanogenmod-12-t2955551 installed.
I have the option of buying a cheap working phone from someone I know but it is an 9100 model, one of their original batch, is this compatible with the ROM and pit files from above?
Or should I pass on buying it and instead get an 9100G? What other ones are ok and obviously work in the UK?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would go with the international version(i9100). It is more common, and there is more development for it. The "G" version has a different chipset, which makes it incompatible with roms from the i9100. From what I've heard the TI chip isn't as good overall as the exynos chip in performance either, although the numbers are the same(1.2ghz)
noppy22 said:
I would go with the international version(i9100). It is more common, and there is more development for it. The "G" version has a different chipset, which makes it incompatible with roms from the i9100. From what I've heard the TI chip isn't as good overall as the exynos chip in performance either, although the numbers are the same(1.2ghz)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply, it's more common really? Three other family members have had S2's and they were all i9100G.
I noticed you said:
international version (i9100)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is going against what I read kind off... According to wikipedia:
Galaxy S II - Model GT-I9100G
The Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100G was released in late 2011, and is usually sold instead of the original GT-I9100 in certain markets (mostly Asia and some parts of Europe). An overview of the Samsung Galaxy S II GT-I9100G can be seen on Samsung's official website.[61] It features a Texas Instruments OMAP4430 SoC instead of the Exynos 4210 in the GT-I9100. It is visually identical to the GT-I9100, as well as having the same 1.2 GHz processor speed and dual-core ARM Cortex A9 processor technology. However, the SoC is of a different design and the Mali-400 GPU has been replaced by a PowerVR SGX 540 GPU. This difference in the SoC makes this variant incompatible with custom ROMs intended for the I9100, but it has been steadily gaining its own aftermarket support (such as from CyanogenMod[62]) due to the relative ease of development and the openness of the TI OMAP platform..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hyflex said:
Thanks for your reply, it's more common really? Three other family members have had S2's and they were all i9100G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More common worldwide, meaning it has more developers and variety of roms etc. Perhaps where you are the "G" is more common as it was only introduced into a limited market.
The difference in hardware is negligable though, I only meant to say they are incompatible between them. The TI is indeed open source, so if you want to develop your own rom/kernels and create your own device tree/kernel tree etc. it would be much easier from a purely aosp base.
I guess at the end of the day, if you just want to install a rom, then forget it, either one will do. And the fact you have the files already for the "G" it might be easier to get another. If you plan to update the rom in the future or try a few different ones to see which one you prefer, I would recommend the i9100
noppy22 said:
More common worldwide, meaning it has more developers and variety of roms etc. Perhaps where you are the "G" is more common as it was only introduced into a limited market.
The difference in hardware is negligable though, I only meant to say they are incompatible between them. The TI is indeed open source, so if you want to develop your own rom/kernels and create your own device tree/kernel tree etc. it would be much easier from a purely aosp base.
I guess at the end of the day, if you just want to install a rom, then forget it, either one will do. And the fact you have the files already for the "G" it might be easier to get another. If you plan to update the rom in the future or try a few different ones to see which one you prefer, I would recommend the i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm rather confused now... I installed: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/rom-cyanogenmod-12-t2955551 onto 2x i9100G phones and it works perfectly... but yet it isn't a G version of the ROM when I should have installed http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...-2-unofficial-cyanogenmod-12-1s-os12-t3103494
How are they even working?!
Hyflex said:
I'm rather confused now... I installed: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s2/development-derivatives/rom-cyanogenmod-12-t2955551 onto 2x i9100G phones and it works perfectly... but yet it isn't a G version of the ROM when I should have installed http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...-2-unofficial-cyanogenmod-12-1s-os12-t3103494
How are they even working?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea!! I don't have a i9100g, but everthing I've read indicates it is not possible. Can you take a couple of screenshots in "About phone" in settings with rom build and device variant? The only thing I can think of is if they used the same chipset as i9100 for some of the i9100g's at some point?? I don't know
noppy22 said:
I have no idea!! I don't have a i9100g, but everthing I've read indicates it is not possible. Can you take a couple of screenshots in "About phone" in settings with rom build and device variant? The only thing I can think of is if they used the same chipset as i9100 for some of the i9100g's at some point?? I don't know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked one and it was the i9100, I swear the other is an i9100G though, if it isn't then I'm seeing things and got incredibly lucky flashing that ROM lol, silly me.
UPDATE ON 20/4
Watches will receive Android Wear 2.0 end of April/late May
Moto 360 Gen 2
Moto 360 Sport
Source: https://support.google.com/androidwear/forum/AAAAI6hwIZU5v_b7oHHsy0/?hl=en
UPDATE ON 15/4:
Android Wear's Twitter : Android Wear 2.0 OTA will be arriving to your Moto 360 Gen 2 soon.
There's a confirm that our watch can upgrade to Android Wear 2.0
And there's a release date of AW 2.0 (9 FEB 2017)
Is that means the 2.0 updates will release on 9 FEB?
I don't think so.... I think the OEM's (Like Motorola) need some time to personalize the new Android Wear...
I just downloaded what it says is 2.0 to my phone, and it looks pretty much the same to me. I don't get it!? Was expecting something new. It definitely says Version 2.0, updated 1/25/17. Am I missing something?
kat3k said:
I just downloaded what it says is 2.0 to my phone, and it looks pretty much the same to me. I don't get it!? Was expecting something new. It definitely says Version 2.0, updated 1/25/17. Am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android Wear on your phone may be 2.0, it is on mine, but that's not the software on your watch. It may contain the code needed to run the newer Wear when your watch gets it but that's what is important and isn't released yet. Won't be for a while most likely. I'm sure the new watches being announced next week will get it first and then it's up to Motorola to release it to our model which could be days, weeks, or months after.
If you go on your watch into Settings --> About --> Versions what do you get?
Mine is attached
eltigre4jc said:
I don't think so.... I think the OEM's (Like Motorola) need some time to personalize the new Android Wear...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought part of the licencing for Wear prevented the OEM's from customisation. Other than bootsplash and pre-installed apps.
We should get it pretty quickly due to this.
kat3k said:
I just downloaded what it says is 2.0 to my phone, and it looks pretty much the same to me. I don't get it!? Was expecting something new. It definitely says Version 2.0, updated 1/25/17. Am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android Wear 2.0 is the firmware not the app
It's easy to confuse between the Android Wear app and the device firmware
henderjr said:
Android Wear on your phone may be 2.0, it is on mine, but that's not the software on your watch. It may contain the code needed to run the newer Wear when your watch gets it but that's what is important and isn't released yet. Won't be for a while most likely. I'm sure the new watches being announced next week will get it first and then it's up to Motorola to release it to our model which could be days, weeks, or months after.
If you go on your watch into Settings --> About --> Versions what do you get?
Mine is attached
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Version 1.5.0 on watch. So is this considered the firmware? Because 2.0 in the AW app is pretty much same as usual. Like everyone, I've been anxiously waiting for the big update. False alarm I guess.
---------- Post added at 05:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:39 PM ----------
lhkakex said:
Android Wear 2.0 is the firmware not the app
It's easy to confuse between the Android Wear app and the device firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm afraid that's what I've done. Thanks for the clarification.
eltigre4jc said:
I don't think so.... I think the OEM's (Like Motorola) need some time to personalize the new Android Wear...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola should already be working on Android Wear 2.0 for the Moto 360 2nd Gen since the final preview was released last month.
9 Feb is coming, it's time to count down
still we have different time zone haha
why can't we make a rom from the moto 360 v2 and make it able to flash to the moto 1st gen?
AndrewM3 said:
why can't we make a rom from the moto 360 v2 and make it able to flash to the moto 1st gen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because that isn't how it works.
The two watches have entirely different chipsets. The OG 360 has an outdated TI OMAP processor, while the 2015 360 has an SD4xx variant. Not just that, but, the 2015 360 has no POGO pins to connect to, meaning dumping the firmware from the watch, and like I said, even if you did it via BT/extracting OTA files, you'd have no way to flash it to the OG 360 without a custom cable, and even then, it wouldn't work because of the architecture change.
AndrewM3 said:
why can't we make a rom from the moto 360 v2 and make it able to flash to the moto 1st gen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's possible to make a custom rom
The problem is moto 360 doesn't have a usb port
AndrewM3 said:
why can't we make a rom from the moto 360 v2 and make it able to flash to the moto 1st gen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know, it's completely impossible. Moto 360 1st gen runs on different processor and architecture while Moto 2nd gen has a Qualcomm.
Anyone had any luck yet?
do we know if there are a lot of new features expected with this update?
edit:
nice roundup of the updates. now i'm really looking forward to it.
https://www.wareable.com/android-wear/android-wear-update-everything-you-need-to-know-2735
I'm waiting on it also, I was actually a bit mad that it wasn't an 'all in one' release where all the watches received the update simultaneously
I asked Motorola Germany on Twitter. And they said they don't have a release date but they are working on the OTA.
Gesendet von meinem HTC 10 mit Tapatalk
Cool, hopefully Motorola America is working on it too
I think they will launch it Worlwide at the same time. I think there are no regional differences?!
From Wearable.com:
We have it on good authority that the rollout will actually begin on 15 February and, while Google has tested Wear 2.0 on all the devices listed below internally, it's up to the manufacturers themselves to sign-off on the revamped OS and get it out the door.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.wareable.com/android-wear/update-when-android-wear-2-existing-smartwatch-2017
So it seems unlikely that we'll see anything before next week at the soonest. My guess would be the individualization for each watch/company would be a lot smaller than android phones so I'd hope that it would take a lot short time to get it approved, but we'll see.
iron.maaasel said:
I asked Motorola Germany on Twitter. And they said they don't have a release date but they are working on the OTA.
Gesendet von meinem HTC 10 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have the moto gen 1 or 2?
and to which is the twitter message from motorola referring to gen 1 or 2
I got a Project Tango tablet from work, it has k1 tegra chipset and it is stuck on original firmware, which is android 4.4.4 and doesnt performs very well on normal tasks as far as it is very powerfull hardware. Any chance I can upgrade it with custom firmware? Maybe shield tablet which has similar hardware without the special sensors?
Last time I had the tango (back in July 2016) there were no custom firmware/rom for it. I would check out the Tango Devs group on G+ to see if anyone has created an update for it.
Any news about this? Any help would be much appreciated.
SrAgaporni said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off you are going to need root the device. Then a custom recovery. Then you can think of customs ROMS if you can work out the hardware and the appropriate drivers.
Just because it has the same processor as the Shield does not mean that all the other hardware is the same.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
ashleyglassel said:
First off you are going to need root the device. Then a custom recovery. Then you can think of customs ROMS if you can work out the hardware and the appropriate drivers.
Just because it has the same processor as the Shield does not mean that all the other hardware is the same.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, the process is crystal clear, I just wanted to know if anybody already advanced anything in this device, but it feels as there is no progress at all, so It will be worth to sell this nearly new tablet and buy another device with more community working with it. A shame, with 128Gb emmc, 4Gb RAM and a powerfull processor...
It would be great if we could get any assistance from Google on this, I highly am doubtful they will release kernels but it is worth trying to petition them to release them, or anything of value towards this, to the community. The hardware is excellent on the tango Dev tablet, but at this point the software is absimal, and, as is, barely functions. I find most software cannot run and constant glitches make using it worse than a contemporary generic device despite an excellent touchscreen and the tegra processor.
I have rooted my Tango tablet, but what hopes do we have of a community rom running any newer version of Android? (5.1+) The shield tablet has similar hardware and could maybe be used as a base to develop from, as the basic kernel will be similar. anyone determine what wifi/Bluetooth hardware is on board the tango?
Come on Google, help us get full functionality and release the kernels!
Is there any one behind this project?
alexcount said:
It would be great if we could get any assistance from Google on this, I highly am doubtful they will release kernels but it is worth trying to petition them to release them, or anything of value towards this, to the community. The hardware is excellent on the tango Dev tablet, but at this point the software is absimal, and, as is, barely functions. I find most software cannot run and constant glitches make using it worse than a contemporary generic device despite an excellent touchscreen and the tegra processor.
I have rooted my Tango tablet, but what hopes do we have of a community rom running any newer version of Android? (5.1+) The shield tablet has similar hardware and could maybe be used as a base to develop from, as the basic kernel will be similar. anyone determine what wifi/Bluetooth hardware is on board the tango?
Come on Google, help us get full functionality and release the kernels!
Is there any one behind this project?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you want the development of the kernel at least started, make the kernel start logs. use the program syslog from Google Play for example.
I completely forgot that I found and downloaded the source code of the kernel on this tablet. The kernel is there version 3.10.24. With a strong desire, it could easily be adapted to the modern kernel 3.10.96.
I have the possibility of getting this tablet sub $100 and would be extremely interested if a newer Android could be loaded here. Or even maybe something like UBports (formerly Ubuntu Touch)
Vartom said:
I completely forgot that I found and downloaded the source code of the kernel on this tablet. The kernel is there version 3.10.24. With a strong desire, it could easily be adapted to the modern kernel 3.10.96.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't find this source anywhere, could you upload a copy? I know a few people, myself included are looking for it. Someone else who is looking https://plus.google.com/u/1/+GregWillardr3pwn/posts/V1K5XDBtKig
ShapeShifter499 said:
I can't find this source anywhere, could you upload a copy? I know a few people, myself included are looking for it. Someone else who is looking https://plus.google.com/u/1/+GregWillardr3pwn/posts/V1K5XDBtKig
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have been with me for so long that I don’t remember exactly where I downloaded them from. I remember that it was some kind of official site about the project of tango.
1
2
3
Vartom said:
They have been with me for so long that I don’t remember exactly where I downloaded them from. I remember that it was some kind of official site about the project of tango.
1
2
3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you don't know exactly if these were the most recent version of the source?
If these are not the latest, it's better than nothing. I'm going to share these with that other guy and on reddit. Thank you for uploading these.
For anyone following this, the latest kernel appears to be here https://github.com/r3pwn/android_kernel_google_yellowstone
Hi guys, orginal Android 4.4 is still the latest Rom available, correct ?
HI.. I need the ROM stock for this device, Someone?
Hi again.. I found this on github, someone know something about this project?
NVIDIA AOSP device tree for building Project Tango Android 7.0
https://github.com/Project-Google-Tango/android_device_google_yellowstone
Anonikat I looked at that too. How great would that be? A 7.0 N even if I'd loose some Tango functionality. I'd just like it as a regular tablet, personally.
ShapeShifter499 said:
I have the possibility of getting this tablet sub $100 and would be extremely interested if a newer Android could be loaded here. Or even maybe something like UBports (formerly Ubuntu Touch)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Closest I've seen so far that seems functional for the most part is LineageOS 15.1 (Android 8.1) that's listed as an unofficial release in this forum.
Here is TWRP recovery project for this device https://forum.xda-developers.com/sh...overy-project-tango-k1-atap-twrp-3-2-t3901519