Hi. I want to know how max wifi speed has Redmi Note 4X. I have internet 100Mb/s in home but phone in tests shows only about 40Mb/s (max 45). When I download some files it shows max 4MB/s. It's strange because phone has a/b/g/n standard, so it should show 100Mb/s.
Redmi Note 4X Tapatalk
I get 80-90Mbs download speed via 5G wifi from a Xiaomi Mini router, which has a max ethernet speed of 100Mbs.
So no problem with wifi speed.
I have a Redmi Note 4 sd 3/32 global version.
Hello, I also have only 40mbs at 5g channel on 300mbs link. Where to look for best wifi settings?
Guys I discovered how to speed up wifi speed. Go to /data/misc/wifi and open "WCNSS_qcom_cfg.ini" file. Find "gChannelBondingMode5GHz=1" line. Under this add "gChannelBondingMode24GHz=1" line. Next find "WmmIsEnabled=0" and change 0 to 1. Next reboot. My wifi speed up from 40Mb/s to 80.
Hi, guys!
I see you've managed to enable the 2.4 GHz channel bonding, but, does anyone know the maximum speed that mido support? I'm using mine on a 5 GHz wifi network and it can't go above 150mbps of link speed. It's the same on both frequencies (2.4 and 5 GHz). I have other Android phones that are connected with a link of 433mbps.
I tried a lot of tweaks and none of them worked.
Thanks!
FMAranda said:
Hi, guys!
I see you've managed to enable the 2.4 GHz channel bonding, but, does anyone know the maximum speed that mido support? I'm using mine on a 5 GHz wifi network and it can't go above 150mbps of link speed. It's the same on both frequencies (2.4 and 5 GHz). I have other Android phones that are connected with a link of 433mbps.
I tried a lot of tweaks and none of them worked.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SoC in the phone theoretically can support 802.11ac (2 x 2 : 1)
but the actual SoC in the phone does not support it, it's not built in (it's in WCN3680b) - only 802.11n.
The phone's SoC has a WCN3660B and it has no 802.11ac (in WCN3680B there is).
This is what the phone can do fo you 802.11n:
- 1x1:1 antenna config and thus
. ^ ^ ^
. | | |
. | | '-- 1 possible data stream
. | '-- 1 RX antenna
. '-- 1 TX antenna,
- so one antenna, the antenna has a Tx/Rx integrated switch
thus (with one antenna) there's no possibility for MIMO, nor beamforming (not even physically possible)
but that's a 802.11ac feature anyway (and as I mentioned the chip inside does not support it).
(Note: BT is using the same antenna!
You can easily experience the slowdown of Wifi connection
along with an active and traffic forwarding BT connection
because the internal switch has to switch to BT TX/RX too.)
- Long or Short GI (800ns | 400ns)
- Channel bandwidth: 20 or 40MHz (HT20 | HT40)
TL;DR - this phone's capabilities are:
Code:
..Wifi...| Freq.....|.Channel..|.Guard....|.Max. conn.speed
."type"..|..........|.bandw....|.Interval.|.(1 stream)
---------+----------+----------+----------+----------------
.802.11g.|.2.4GHz...|..20MHz...|..800ns...|....54Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..20MHz...|..800ns...|....65Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..20MHz...|..400ns...|....72Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..40MHz...|..800ns...|....135Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..40MHz...|..400ns...|....150Mbps
So all your tweaks should be supported on both the phone and the AP (wireless router, AP, whatever) side as well.
Telegra.ph article - where I explained all a bit more.
https://telegra.ph/Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-4X-Snapdragon---Wifi-along-with-Bluetooth--bad-network-experience-and-sporadical-Bluetooth-connection-issues-05-26
All my Telegra.ph articles: http://telegra.ph/Telegraph-posts-by-crok-05-28
crok.bic said:
The SoC in the phone theoretically can support 802.11ac-t is (2 x 2 : 1)
but the actual SoC in the phone this is not built in - only 802.11n.
The phone's SoC has a WCN3660B and it has no 802.11ac (in WCN3680B there is).
This is what the phone can do fo you 802.11n:
- 1x1:1 antenna config and thus
. ^ ^ ^
. | | |
. | | '-- 1 possible data stream
. | '-- 1 RX antenna
. '-- 1 TX antenna,
- so one antenna, the antenna has a Tx/Rx integrated switch
thus (with one antenna) there's no MIMO-ra, nor beamforming (not even physically can do it)
but that's a 802.11ac feature anyway (but as I mentioned the chip inside does not support it).
(Note: BT is using the same antenna.
You can easily experience the slowdown of Wifi connection
along with an active and traffic forwarding BT connection
because the internal switch has to switch to BT TX/RX too.)
- Long or Short GI (800ns | 400ns)
- Channel bandwidth: 20 or 40MHz (HT20 | HT40)
TL;DR - this phone's capabilities are:
Code:
..Wifi...| Freq.....|.Channel..|.Guard....|.Max. conn.speed
."type"..|..........|.bandw....|.Interval.|.(1 stream)
---------+----------+----------+----------+----------------
.802.11g.|.2.4GHz...|..20MHz...|..800ns...|....54Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..20MHz...|..800ns...|....65Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..20MHz...|..400ns...|....72Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..40MHz...|..800ns...|....135Mbps
.802.11n.|.2.4/5GHz.|..40MHz...|..400ns...|....150Mbps
So all your tweaks should be supported on both the phone and the AP (wireless router, AP, whatever) side as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, thank you for sharing your knowledge with us. I'm actually ok now that I know that mido is physically not capable to go any further. That's something I'll look into on my next phone. I think I'll PM you with a question regarding the wireless network I have setup on my home. I'll be glad if you reply me.
Thanks again!
Zgadnijcie said:
Guys I discovered how to speed up wifi speed. Go to /data/misc/wifi and open "WCNSS_qcom_cfg.ini" file. Find "gChannelBondingMode5GHz=1" line. Under this add "gChannelBondingMode24GHz=1" line. Next find "WmmIsEnabled=0" and change 0 to 1. Next reboot. My wifi speed up from 40Mb/s to 80.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone else have tried this?
Yes, works.
jctmobz26 said:
Anyone else have tried this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
crok.bic said:
Yes, works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly I can't find those indicated in the post.
I explained in #6 what the phone can do, even posted a table with possible settings.
jctmobz26 said:
Anyone else have tried this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Crap my bad it's in the vendor file not in the /data. I changed the "WmmIsEnabled" to 1 already just gonna test if something has changed
Related
In the file tiwlan.ini located in /system/etc I have the lines:
Code:
HT_Enable=0 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 0 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
I think we can enable BurstMode and 802.11n (if driver allow it) support.
I cannot try, my access point isn't "n" (only "g" at 2.4GHz), but If you have an "n" wi-fi access point....
did a little digging.
looks like the wlan controller for the x10 mini pro is:
texas instrument wL1271a
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wt...ntId=29993&navigationId=12762&templateId=6123
TQM679002A from TriQuint
http://www.triquint.com/prodserv/more_info/proddisp.aspx?prod_id=TQM679002A
source: http://www.phonewreck.com/2010/08/05/823/
which means that the x10 mini pro is indeed b/g/n compatible. but only over 2.4Ghz band.
I'll do some more investigation tonight when I get back home.
Wonder what kind of throughputs I'll net.
Ok thanks! I'm using burst and n settings to 1..
Ok it works but I do not know my speed....
Sent from my U20i using XDA App
I'm here again.
I discovered how set up n in my router at 2.4Ghz (was n at 5Ghz) AND IT WORKS !!!!!
NOW I'M AT 65MBITS! router is at 1st floor and I'm at 2nd floor, but speed is > 54
So our mini pro IS n !
UPDATE: I've just tried close the access point.. 65mbit... Ok, 65 is greater than 54.. I think firmware - driver limits "n" speed.
oversim said:
I'm here again.
I discovered how set up n in my router at 2.4Ghz (was n at 5Ghz) AND IT WORKS !!!!!
NOW I'M AT 65MBITS! router is at 1st floor and I'm at 2nd floor, but speed is > 54
So our mini pro IS n !
UPDATE: I've just tried close the access point.. 65mbit... Ok, 65 is greater than 54.. I think firmware - driver limits "n" speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How you discovered this? Wich software?
I'm trying.....
Thank You!!
dettofatto said:
How you discovered this? Wich software?
I'm trying.....
Thank You!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No software, simple: while examining configuration files..
That's great news guys! How about the battery life? does switching to n affect battery life significantly?
TIA
Absolutely no... Battery behaviour is the same using 65 or 54mbit...
Sent from my U20i using XDA App
oversim said:
Absolutely no... Battery behaviour is the same using 65 or 54mbit...
Sent from my U20i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfect! 65 mbit!
802.11n should improve reception and by the way may preserve battery life at the oposite of 802.11g.
What information have you changed?
HT_Enable=0 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 0 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
To:
?
HT_Enable=1 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 1 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
ok, thanks! i will try at home.
Hi,
I change the file tiwlan.ini as in the 1st post, but I didn't measure any difference.
I use wireshark in my laptop with wireless card (ipw4965 - module ipwagn) in monitor mode to check the traffic between my e10i (X10 mini, not pro) and my router (Linksys WAG325N).
In any instant the baudrate was greater that 54Mbps, but my laptop connects with a maximum of 130Mbps.
My X10 mini show 65mbps without any modification, the values are 0. Hmm...this could be from my router (asus wl500 gp, oleg firmware.) I will try the modified values
how are u guys editing it ??
NashXDA said:
how are u guys editing it ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need root access to your device and to mount the system folder with write permissions.
Copy your original tiwlan.ini to the sdcard, edit the file in the PC, and copy again to the original location.
I'm using root explorer to edit this file..
phoxy84 said:
What information have you changed?
HT_Enable=0 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 0 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
To:
?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both 1, enabled.
rubensun said:
did a little digging.
looks like the wlan controller for the x10 mini pro is:
texas instrument wL1271a
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wt...ntId=29993&navigationId=12762&templateId=6123
TQM679002A from TriQuint
http://www.triquint.com/prodserv/more_info/proddisp.aspx?prod_id=TQM679002A
source: http://www.phonewreck.com/2010/08/05/823/
which means that the x10 mini pro is indeed b/g/n compatible. but only over 2.4Ghz band.
I'll do some more investigation tonight when I get back home.
Wonder what kind of throughputs I'll net.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you would have read everything, you would have read this:
Supports the soon-to be ratified WiFi Direct™ and Soft AP mode capabilities, extensible to support additional protocols
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This hints that it is draft-n, not final-n which is a result of the 65 speed only (which burstmode actually gives over a 802.11g connection as burstmode simply sends data from one device to another without waiting for the other device to say "I have recieved it"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burst_mode_(computing)
)
In order to enable final 802.11n, the chip would have to have its firmware updated. On my Intel 4965, this same issue occured: I had a draft router and a draft card (The Intel 4965). The speeds were I believe 104 or something less. Now, with both of them on the final spec with their firmwares updated, Im hitting 130.
Hi folks!
The modification I present here comes from this thread.
So far tested on: miniCM RC1, CM7 RC4
To work!
1. We go to /system/etc/firmaware directory and find files named:
Code:
/etc/firmware/fm_rx_init_1273.2.bts
/etc/firmware/fm_tx_init_1273.2.bts
/etc/firmware/fmc_init_1273.2.bts
2. Are they there? Good, don't touch them. Are they not there? Well, it's a pity, you won't get 5GHz band
3. Go back to /system/etc and find a file named tiwlan.ini
NOTE: In CM7 based ROMs the path may be /system/etc/wifi
4. Look for the following lines:
Code:
HT_Enable=0 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 0 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
WiFiAdhoc = 0
and change them into:
Code:
HT_Enable=1 #0=diable 802.11n support / 1=Enable
BurstModeEnable = 1 # 0 - Disabled 1 - Enabled
WiFiAdhoc = 1
5. This stage is for people who have files from step 1!
Look for the line:
Code:
Single_Dual_Band_Solution = 0
and change it into
Code:
Single_Dual_Band_Solution = 1
6. Save, reboot.
Troubleshooting: If after enabling your wifi keeps disconnecting, or you get the "connecting" bug, go to settings->networks->wifi, erase all remembered networks and reboot.
Disclamer: if you crush your wifi or brick your phone, I'm not responsible for it.
5GHz band and AdHoc features need testing to prove they work, N standard 100% working.
Also, I've been told that each ROM has different tiwlan file - if it's so, then we need custom zip for each ROM available. I'm not familiar with how it's done, so if someone could prepare them I'll attach them to the first post
Enjoy, X8 users!
Thanx for this when i got home i will test on my mini pro with 5gHz if it works i will include it as standart in my rom (mini and mini pro roms)
Sent from my U20i using XDA Premium App
Ok, we've got tests from polish android board and it's confirmed - X8 connects in n standard!
Graveir said:
Ok, we've got tests from polish android board and it's confirmed - X8 connects in n standard!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, thats just great but dont you think its drain more the battery?
Well, I've installed it something like half an hour ago, so I can't say for sure. There are two possibilities:
1. Since we already had more aerials in our phones, only they were unused, the battery drain with enabled wifi will stay as it was.
2. The additional aerials for n standard were inactive (I don't know if it's possible if they're on one chip, though) and after enabling them the battery drain will increase.
What can I say - check it yourself
aerosmith1 said:
wow, thats just great but dont you think its drain more the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys often talk about drain battery.
Generally, better performance and better functionality it is more battery eating. If you want max battery saving, then never do not use bluetooth, wi-fi, GSM, 2G, 3G, set min brightness etc.. Everybody have choose.
i noticed no defference !!!!!!!
asn-mat said:
i noticed no defference !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check stuff like connection speed or distance that you can now have from you router. Mayhaps you simply have a good router hardware and the difference is hard to spot - I feel an improvement personally
But if you feel you don't need it - switch it off, why risk a higher battery drain if nothing really changes
Can anyone confirm by checking connected devices in your routers status?
192.168.0.1
192.168.1.1
and username and password is often:
Code:
admin
admin
or
Code:
admin
1234
EDIT: If anyone can confirm this I will add this to the next MiniCM.
TESTS:
http://forum.android.com.pl/f257/mo...i-802-11n-dla-x8-60185/index4.html#post541352
What I'm posting is a translation of the linked post:
I'm currently using Sense CM7RC3 ROM. In my tiwlan.ini file (which in my case was in /system/etc/wifi) I changed only the lines:
HT_Enable=1
BurstModeEnable = 1
After a restart the phone established connection with Dlink Dir-615 router with firmware dd-wrt without any problem. In order to make sure if the phone is working in n standard I switched the router into N-only mode and it works, while my other phone without this improvement lost connection.
As I use FTP server in my phone on daily basis I made some speed tests.
In G mode I get average of 700kBps.
In N mode I get slightly more - 800kBps.
This means that the phone cannot even fully use the functionality of B standard. Let's add that during saving files on 4 class SD card via USB I get about 1500 kBps.
During tests I was using channel 1, however, there is another network in my range working on the same channel, so I switched my router in channel 13 and the connection speed dropped below 100 kBps.
The Single_Dual_Band_Solution = 1 issue:
I need more tests, but it seems that it does not unlock 5GHz band, but rather extends 2,4Ghz one. In the 2.4 there are 14 channels defined, but you cannot use any above the 9th, this setting allows to use 10-14 channels.
I also tasted range, and there is a considerable improvement here. In the room where G standard was working unstably and slower, N works flawlessly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope it's enough
Well... I dont find tiwlan.ini in CM7 RC4 Rom... Where is it?
Edit: got it
Graveir said:
....Dlink Dir-615 router...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As i know, this router supports only 2.4GHz freq., isn't it?
What'd you know, you're right... I'll post it on polish board then and ask for more tests However, this still means that n standard works, and that 5GHz band might be operational!
I use CM7 and Dlink DIR-620 and can confirm what n standart works
I just post this information about 802.11n unlock in our 4pda forum to find testers, who can confirm 5GHz support. I hope...
ojojojworld said:
I use CM7 and Dlink DIR-620 and can confirm what n standart works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This router, as previous, supports only 2.4GHz...
I mean n standart not 5Ghz
Find variable:
Code:
WiFiAdhoc = 0
Change it to:
Code:
WiFiAdhoc = 1
Now you can connect to Ad|hoc (computer<>computer networks)
Thank you for this! I'm gonna write in into the first post.
Could you by any means verify if it works?
Graveir said:
Thank you for this! I'm gonna write in into the first post.
Could you by any means verify if it works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will test it soon and post results...
Tested on racht's v0.15 Floyo. Wifi connected to my TP-Link WR740N. Was set as 11n only. But after 10-15 secs phone couldn't find any network. Restart of wifi doesn't work.
Just a reminder to get it on top of the list again
It is becoming rather difficult to compare all the different statements about Wifi performance and the speed results determined with Speedtest.Net
Don't use the bars at the bottom of the screen.
These are just a graphical image representing that something is going on with Wifi. If the parameters in the firmware are changed you can get as much bars as you want.
Furthermore the bars don't say anything about the quality of the Wifi connection.
Don't use Speedtest.Net
Speedtest.Net doesn't measure Wifi speed but the speed of the connection you are having with a remote Speedtest.Net server on the internet. The speed it indicates is the speed of the weakest link in the routing. So congestion on the internet (not your Wifi) is represented in a slower speed.
When your family or housemates are streaming Youtube the speed it indicates is the speed for the remainder of the bandwith that is left over for you.
Use only Iperf!!! (it's free)
With Iperf you set up a server and a client in your home network . By executing Iperf with different parameters you can get a lot of different info about your Wifi like bandwith, lost packets, jitter, sent and recieved data, etcetera.
For the noob it seems complicated but it isn't. There is a good tutorial on http://openmaniak.com/iperf.php
Please do me, the community and yourself a favor.
Use Iperf.
That way we can get data we can compare.
And maybe someday it will get us somewhere
Thank you very much in advance
PS: Don't just do one test. Do multiple tests. This is something you can automate with Iperf. Set it to do 20 (or more) tests and get some coffee.
using -c<ip> -d I get the following in the same room of my 300mbps wireless n router:
Client connecting to 192.168.1.100, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[256] local 192.168.1.102 port 49792 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[256] 0.0-10.0 sec 8.52 MBytes 7.13 Mbits/sec
[280] 0.0-10.1 sec 36.1 MBytes 30.1 Mbits/sec
[288] local 192.168.1.102 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 58706
i'm going to assume that this is bad...
Edit: Another test doing -t 25 -i 1:
I get an average transfer of about 4.4 MBytes and Bandwidth of an average of about 38MBits/sec
dingdonggggg said:
Just a reminder to get it on top of the list again
It is becoming rather difficult to compare all the different statements about Wifi performance and the speed results determined with Speedtest.Net
Don't use the bars at the bottom of the screen.
These are just a graphical image representing that something is going on with Wifi. If the parameters in the firmware are changed you can get as much bars as you want.
Furthermore the bars don't say anything about the quality of the Wifi connection.
Don't use Speedtest.Net
Speedtest.Net doesn't measure Wifi speed but the speed of the connection you are having with a remote Speedtest.Net server on the internet. The speed it indicates is the speed of the weakest link in the routing. So congestion on the internet (not your Wifi) is represented in a slower speed.
When your family or housemates are streaming Youtube the speed it indicates is the speed for the remainder of the bandwith that is left over for you.
Use only Iperf!!! (it's free)
With Iperf you set up a server and a client in your home network . By executing Iperf with different parameters you can get a lot of different info about your Wifi like bandwith, lost packets, jitter, sent and recieved data, etcetera.
For the noob it seems complicated but it isn't. There is a good tutorial on http://openmaniak.com/iperf.php
Please do me, the community and yourself a favor.
Use Iperf.
That way we can get data we can compare.
And maybe someday it will get us somewhere
Thank you very much in advance
PS: Don't just do one test. Do multiple tests. This is something you can automate with Iperf. Set it to do 20 (or more) tests and get some coffee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a reminder to get the thread a liitle bit higher on the list again.
Lot's of people asking the same question
Hi all,
I've been trying for several days to get my tab (samsung note 10.1) to work as a 5ghz hotspot... unsuccesfully. I've tried with android 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.
Here are my investigations:
- Connect a tab to a 5hGhz 11a AP router -> it works.
- Force 5Ghz band on the tab (through a very basic app using the setfrequency function of wifimanager), and launch the hotspot -> no change, only 2.4 GHz channels used
- Force 5 Ghz band on 2 tabs and setup "wifi direct" between 2 tabs -> tabs don't see eachother.
- Configure auto mode for the freq choice on the tabs & start wifi direct -> sometimes (roughtly 1 time out of 20) the connection used 5 Ghz.
I use wifi analyzer app to check used channel & frequency.
5 Ghz support looks ok for basic wifi. I believe that hotspot capabilitty is not hardware dependant.
Do you know if the is a way to get an android device to work as a 5ghz hospot? or to force wifi-direct to use 5GHz all the time?
This is my first post on xda. Hope this is the right place.
thanks,
refrech
refrech said:
Hi all,
I've been trying for several days to get my tab (samsung note 10.1) to work as a 5ghz hotspot... unsuccesfully. I've tried with android 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also tried many times to do it. I've even tried to manually edit hostapd.conf but no luck - hostapd can't use 5ghz channels for some reason. Any ideas?
Golomidov said:
I've also tried many times to do it. I've even tried to manually edit hostapd.conf but no luck - hostapd can't use 5ghz channels for some reason. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take another channel, e.g. 44, that helps me with my asus memo pad
I'm interested, but I can't find a solution.
For now I connect a Galaxy S4 with a Galaxy Tab S and I see 78mbps on wifi connection details. Also with wi-fi analyzer I don't see any trasmission on 5GHz frequency
here: https motorola-global-portal custhelp com /app/answers/indevice_detail/a_id/90152/p/30,6720,8577 reports that from JB 4.1 is possible to do 5ghz hotspot...
So, don't give up hope
I'm setting up my newly purchased S9+ and I'm wondering about the "APN protocol" settings which, by default, is set to IPv4. I found some discussion on that in other threads and I tested both settings: IPv4 - only and IPv4/IPv6. Not knowing much about it I might be biased(placebo effect) but I thing I'm getting just a little bit stronger signals(wifi & cell) around a different places at home as shown by 'Network Cell Info Lite' app when I set it to ipv4/ipv6. Looking for a good explanation to a question: is there any merit in that, setting it for ipv4/6?
I am wondering the exact same thing ...
I noticed on Tmobile Community ...some recommend IVp4/IVp6 ....some say IVp6.
I am trying to test dual stacking on Metro PCS /Tmobile but only amateur trial and error .
I wonder IF it gives a slightly 'wider ' footprint on Web.
I wonder IF it gives a 'wider ' bandwidth in transmission and reception for the Device -and consumes slightly more power ?
Meaning - is it like a transceiver transmitting and receiving on two channels at once [or wider bandwith on one channel ] ?
I am not a Dev....so keep answer simple or include a summary -,thanks .?
robertkoa said:
I am wondering the exact same thing ...
I noticed on Tmobile Community ...some recommend IVp4/IVp6 ....some say IVp6.
I am trying to test dual stacking on Metro PCS /Tmobile but only amateur trial and error .
I wonder IF it gives a slightly 'wider ' footprint on Web.
I wonder IF it gives a 'wider ' bandwidth in transmission and reception for the Device -and consumes slightly more power ?
Meaning - is it like a transceiver transmitting and receiving on two channels at once [or wider bandwith on one channel ] ?
I am not a Dev....so keep answer simple or include a summary -,thanks .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found an answer, my phone is set on IPv6 connection through the router settings. I don't have the S9+ anymore so, the details to enable IPv6 are here:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-6/help/oneplus-6-dhcpv6-support-wifi-t3831639#post77392832
Odd, IPV4 vs IPV6 should make no difference on your signal strength. It's just the IP Address version being used.