Related
im proudly here to present you
CyanogenMod_6.1.2-Xtremes
About
Android: 2.2.1
Baseband: 2.1.55
Kernel: 2.6.29
This rom is mostly written by me, yes offcourse i did not reinvent the wheel and used pieces and bits of others also.
It is very stable and did not give me any fc
Bugs
camera isn't fully functional yet for like 3rd party apps
no native wifi/usb tethering
Requirements
Android: 2.1 rooted ROM with Xrecovery installed
Baseband: i suggest 2.1.55 but 2.1.54 should work also
Kernel: 2.6.29
Download
release_1
Howto
1. back you current rom up (optional)
2. do a factory Reset
3. wipe cache partition
4. wipe battery stats
5. install custom zip file (you got to have it saved on your sdcard...)
6. let it reboot after installation, it will crash itselve once maximal twice after thats done it runs perfectly
7. download gapps from here provided by zdzihu
8. sign in once and than flash this new market provided by th4r
now you are ready to go
Recommended apps
Adfree: however the host file is allready modified its recommend to download it and update it once a while
Dolphin Browser HD: gotta love it
Go Launcher: a launcher which i privatly prefer
Root Explorer: a explorer which u have to have...
ScanLife: barcode scanner which works perfectly with this rom
Sysctl Config: this tool will allow you to set values to increase
.....SysCtl: Min Free KBytes: 16284
.....Dirty Ratio: 90
.....Dirty Background Ratio: 55
.....VFS Cache Pressure: 20
.....Oom Allocating Task: Checked
Vignette: pritty nice camera app which will work very descent
Credits
Bin4ry, zdzihu, CyanogenMod team, Jerpelea, TripNRaVeR and all the others
oh and not to forget Meikrekel who made me push this online...
Notes
No, not me nor anyone who worked on any part of this rom is responsible for eventually any damaged caused to your phone or life.
Yes, offcourse i am aware this is CyanogenMod 6.1.3 officially... but in my eyes it is not worthy enough to call it that, because not everything works yet.
WARNING!
I do not want to see any fights, cursing, banthering or what so ever in any negative form in this thread... if so i will let this thread be removed.
support ended, because i bought a new phone
Changelog & Fixxes & Themes
beware you should wait up to 5minutes the first time you installed the rom
Fixxes:
- No signal? visit this page for a lower/higher baseband version and you should be capable to flash it over it.
- i am truly sorry to say, that i blocked most advertising websites, adds etc.etc. if you however for some reason do wanna have these, whipe the hosts file ^^
you found something that is broke?
or are you gettin force closes? (if you really got this because you use baseband that is lower than .54 imma hit u with the ugly stick!)
download catlog from the market and send me the logfile, i'll make sure i'll do my best to fix it
Custom Themes:
SJ_CyanogenMod_6.1.2-Xtremes_X10_theme by Shiwantha
Can't wait to see the changelog and the difference of the CM6.1.3 V4 and CyanogenMod7.
Is there anyone can tell me what's the difference among them??? So many CyanogenMod???!
And i just find something about the .55 BB.:http://www.xperiax10.net/2011/02/19/rogers-releases-new-2-1-1-a-0-6-firmware-for-xperia-x10a/
Great, i can not wait, another cynogen rom and a new chef, i will re-flash my baseband as soon as you upload, can we have some screenshots please, and most of all thankyou for sharing.
.55 Baseband? .54 will be enough for this one?
jusiek said:
.55 Baseband? .54 will be enough for this one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every users has requirements regarding the product or service or others. What we can do is just to waiting for the new ROM.
I like the style very much
And can you tell us more about the camera?Not fully-functional means we can take photos only without selecting the quality of the photos or we can also take video but with another thinks to concern?
cheers
L
@smartgardens, screenshots added
@jusiek, i advice to use the latest baseband tho.. but older one should work without any problems
@laill, yes you can make vids and photo's mate, but its not 100% optimalized like the standerd one is... and 3rd party apps dont like it yet there are 2 camera apps in it the one from miui and the regular one
screenshot from quadrant added
Cool.....
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
hope it'll be release tonight
i need an tester for the zip file i created to boot it with xrecovery...
since i never made one before, i need someone to actually do it besides of me
Hawkysoft said:
i need an tester for the zip file i created to boot it with xrecovery... since i never made one before i need someone to actually test it besides of me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
send it to me bro.
smartgardens said:
send it to me bro.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here if you want me to test it on .54 baseband
waiting for you, hope it'll be release soon
Edit: sent for me
its up, read carefully i dont wanna read stupid questions ;p
oh, great, i'll test now, thanks U
What's baseband 2.1.55? Where can I get this one? I thought 2.1.54 was the newest.
great rom, i have test about 40m, no FC, run very fast, thanks
sniperbag said:
What's baseband 2.1.55? Where can I get this one? I thought 2.1.54 was the newest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See post 2., it will run fine on both 2.1.54 and 2.1.55.
Ahhh, nevermind just realized it.
Im anxious to try this one out. Thanks to all you CyanogenMod-devs, who make our lifes full of joy and excitement.
Cheers.
can someone upload the ics rom for the philippines?
nmnarora said:
@trantiena10 shared this link in the general section, I thought to share it here in the dev section.
WT19i
http://narod.ru/disk/51833859001.cf1a96943518243acc58940b1106847b/WT19i_4.1.B.0.431_Generic.rar.html
@thievun added MF link :
http://www.mediafire.com/?31a4krabpcc810a
@giosal mirroring all sony links :
ftp://giosal.webhop.net/Incoming/Sony_Updates
www.4shared.com/rar/iXSC0Tah/WT19i_41B0431_PH_Generic_1254-.html?
By boyq
WT19a
For those in need for WT19a :
@andreson01 posted
https://www.dropbox.com/s/b6cmbt2lzs9vvz7/WT19a_4.1.B.0.431_america.ftf
http://www.4shared.com/file/oYw2yWhW/WT19a_41B0431_america.html wt19A! (by Betogar)
http://www.mediafire.com/?275uwf5j7niksdh [MIRROR] wt19A!
(by davidcmc)
Plz PM me if any links die, ill remove them
Quick Review :
- Everything works!
- New bootlogo (SONY), new bootanimation (Walkman) and new baseband 72, old kernel 2.6.32.9
- Games work fine, you might notice a little lag, but since the OS install is fresh maybe that is why. I tested temple run, the accelerometer works fine and touches are responsive as they should be (infact i feel higher fps, not sure though).
- Accelerometer in normal app rotations might be a lil slow as compared to CM7.2. But thats not a major problem is it?
- Walkman app, launcher are the same, but with new icons from NXT theme
- As compared to my friend's neo v on .562, this is smoooooth....infact just like 2.3.4, quick and responsive
- Camera is the same as on Minicmsandwich lite AOSP
- Phone app (Infinite view) is slow, but is now perfectly resized for mdpi
- Calender & Calculator are same
- Two galleries - Xperia gallery(similar to 2.3.4 gallery) and ICS standard gallery
- Little jerkiness while recording 720p with image stabilizer ON, with it off, no problems.
- Track ID still wont work for lost DRM keys, unless u install the new version from Play store.
- Brightness Levels are less as compared to non stock roms like CM7.2, etc.
- Battery life needs to be tested!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check this thread for dtails rgarding your querry.
tnx for the help, last question. im in ics already but not ph version, what is the diffrence if i flash the original rom for my si number?
my si is 1253-5735
lyrel09 said:
my si is 1253-5735
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No relevance, you can flash any ftf just make sure of correct baseband and model. Either using generic international or ph. For me im using the international generic. I thnk d only diff is on some apps that are pre installed but the rest are all the same. I suggest you retain your current unless you like to flash the ph generic found on page 5 or 6 of that thread posted by kabayan boyq.
Sent from my WT19i using XDA
what is baseband? how to know if mine is correct baseband?
lyrel09 said:
what is baseband? how to know if mine is correct baseband?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Baseband is somehow relatd to our network frequency. Say 900/1800 etc and so on. Just flash the ftft and it will be just fine. Take note there are (2) types of wt19. One which has I and a on the end so choose wisely. For philippines I thnk wt19i is dominant, just check for the sticker on your box if its I or a.
Sent from my WT19i using XDA
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Modifications:
SELinux unlocked
Disabled protection does not allow to boot the OS(disabled at the level of Linux kernel)
Permissive mode is set automatically at boot (without the possibility to switch back to enforce)
Before(you can do it after flash,but recommended before) installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
SecurityLogAgent has to be removed or frozen.
Flash kernel in odin.
v2 - SELinux fix.
Download: Google Drive
Sources: Google Drive
Blue cat said:
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Modifications:
SELinux unlocked
Disabled protection does not allow to boot the OS(disabled at the level of Linux kernel)
Permissive mode is set automatically at boot (without the possibility to switch back to enforce)
Before installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
Flash kernel in odin.
This is my first kernel which I create on Linux. I hope everything will be working stable.
Download: Google Drive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you - I flashed it as per your instructions. Seems to have worked fine and it's showing it as running as permissive!
Hi,
I made mine for my rom, but yours is good too.
Thank you for the comunity
Re...
Oops problems !! security notification
Alan-B said:
Hi,
I made mine for my rom, but yours is good too.
Thank you for the comunity
Re...
Oops problems !! security notification
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should remove ALL knox apk,because i never not seen security notifications on my device.
This kernel have only 2 changes.
security/selinux/Makefile and security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
Blue cat said:
I think you should remove ALL knox apk,because i never not seen security notifications on my device.
This kernel have only 2 changes.
security/selinux/Makefile and security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
With my boot.img I have no this message! It is when I made out a will your that and come this message!
NB:
Your Boot and all the eliminated knoks!! (Rom deodex 5.1.1)
Alan-B said:
Your Boot and all the eliminated knoks!! (Rom deodex 5.1.1)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok,I found a solution.
You need to remove SecurityLogAgent
Bluecat, thanks for this! I wonder if you know what differences exist between the P605 and the P607T. Also, did you use the EUR_LL source from Samsung's opensource portal? Its strange that they already have the source out for the P605, but nothing yet for the P607T which received the update first. Makes me think maybe the code base is the same and its only the bloatware bundled by the carrier that differs?
I am also curious to just learn and get my hands dirty with this. Can you share the Makefile for this kernel, or just point towards the guide you used (assuming you used one) to compile this?
karthikrr said:
Bluecat, thanks for this! I wonder if you know what differences exist between the P605 and the P607T. Also, did you use the EUR_LL source from Samsung's opensource portal? Its strange that they already have the source out for the P605, but nothing yet for the P607T which received the update first. Makes me think maybe the code base is the same and its only the bloatware bundled by the carrier that differs?
I am also curious to just learn and get my hands dirty with this. Can you share the Makefile for this kernel, or just point towards the guide you used (assuming you used one) to compile this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry,but i dont know differences between the P605 and P607T.
Yes,sources SM-P605_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip and version OI5.
If you want check have code 607 and 605 differences or not you should check checksum both original zImage(linux kernel). Extract them from both boot.img and compare.
Version 2 use standart selinux permissive way used by mostly kernel developers,it's have many changes in code now and it's will be very long to explain how to change to permissive,just use my sources available now in first post and compare them with original sources.
If you talk about how to compile kernel...was use many guides and other forums...hard part was only create .config file
Blue cat said:
Sorry,but i dont know differences between the P605 and P607T.
Yes,sources SM-P605_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip and version OI5.
If you want check have code 607 and 605 differences or not you should check checksum both original zImage(linux kernel). Extract them from both boot.img and compare.
Version 2 use standart selinux permissive way used by mostly kernel developers,it's have many changes in code now and it's will be very long to explain how to change to permissive,just use my sources available now in first post and compare them with original sources.
If you talk about how to compile kernel...was use many guides and other forums...hard part was only create .config file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will try to extract the zImage from the P607T boot.img. I do not have the P605 though, do you know if the stock boot.img is downloadable anywhere?
Thanks for uploading the source. I just finished downloading the original source from the opensource site, will compare the two and try to understand.
I do know how to complile a linux kernel, I meant can you share the .config file (not the makefile, as I wrongly stated earlier), so I can see what has changed across the entire kernel. Rather than just change one line directly in the config file to disable SELinux, I wanted to use make menuconfig and go through the whole process, just to learn more about android kernels. But since I do not know much about the hardware and driver requirements, wanted to see a stock .config as well as your changed .config to understand.
karthikrr said:
Will try to extract the zImage from the P607T boot.img. I do not have the P605 though, do you know if the stock boot.img is downloadable anywhere?
Thanks for uploading the source. I just finished downloading the original source from the opensource site, will compare the two and try to understand.
I do know how to complile a linux kernel, I meant can you share the .config file (not the makefile, as I wrongly stated earlier), so I can see what has changed across the entire kernel. Rather than just change one line directly in the config file to disable SELinux, I wanted to use make menuconfig and go through the whole process, just to learn more about android kernels. But since I do not know much about the hardware and driver requirements, wanted to see a stock .config as well as your changed .config to understand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My config https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOSmdieTNVaFY3VjA/view?usp=sharing
Boot https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOVFZGZGs3YmloX2s/view?usp=sharing
I dont have original config,you can create your own on linux.
Blue cat said:
My config https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOSmdieTNVaFY3VjA/view?usp=sharing
Boot https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOVFZGZGs3YmloX2s/view?usp=sharing
I dont have original config,you can create your own on linux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brilliant! Thanks for sharing ... As and when I learn anything relevant to the issue of P605 vs. P607T, will update here.
Why does the wifi password get forgotten on every boot?
Any fix for that matter?
valexi said:
Why does the wifi password get forgotten on every boot?
Any fix for that matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blue cat said:
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Before installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
SecurityLogAgent has to be removed or frozen.
Flash kernel in odin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you missed the update to the original post, the fix is as above, set securestorage to false. Since you have already flashed, you can still go to build.prop, make this change, reboot, and you should be fine.
karthikrr said:
Maybe you missed the update to the original post, the fix is as above, set securestorage to false. Since you have already flashed, you can still go to build.prop, make this change, reboot, and you should be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried this. With ro.securestorage.support false. Still no WiFi passwords saved after reboot.
Other than that, this works great!
Xposed (for Samsung by wanam) works great!
valexi, the only thing Ive seen suggested in your case is to reflash the firmware. I do not know of any other solutions for this, because pretty much everybody with this problem seems to have solved it when they changed the securestorage thing.
BlueCat, I went ahead and compared checksums for the stock p607t and p605 kernels, they do NOT match. I also extracted the kernels themselves and the zimage files are of different sizes. I then compared the default config files of the P605_LL_EUR source with the only available source for the P607T, which is KK ... They are considerably different. I am of course going with the assumption that the core config for the kernel between KK and LL should not be TOO different, but of course, this is NOT a reliable test. Lastly, I should also say, the P607T source contained an insane number of config files in the Arch/Arm/configs folder, while the P605 source only had three files! I only compared the three that were common ... It seemed like the 607T has the config files for every possible version of the device, while the 605 one had very specific configs for that device only ... This I am speculating based on the fact that the 607T folder even had a msm8894_sec_l03ltmo_defconfig file in addition to the msm8894_sec_l03leur_defconfig file in the 605.
Will do more comparisons over the next few days, but it does seem like there are more changes under the hood between the 605 and the 607T than one would expect. I really wish samsung would release the source for the 607t, but if you check that page, there is just one single KK code there and nothing else, so it does not seem likely anytime soon
Blue cat said:
Ok,I found a solution.
You need to remove SecurityLogAgent
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re,
Ok remove SecurityLogAgent and folder Container it is ok...
But delete all other knox and Klm gives a problem with the playstor. (Certain protections cannot be erased)
Hey guys,
Great news around, especially with roms like Alan-B's. Thanks for sharing :good:.
Running 4.4, planning to update 5.x as soon as I'm sure I can run Linux Deploy (meaning the need of permissive kernel), though I can't find any intel about VTS (Virtual Terminal Support) enabled kernel. I've been looking for months a way to run framebuffered distros and looks like this is the solution.
I could try to make it myself but I have no experience in kernels, would someone mind give me a hand to get to this goal? At least give me a hint to "quickly" develop and try one, to see if it works and how well...
Don't even know if I'm looking the right way anymore, so thanks by advance for any help and again for the sharing :highfive:.
karthikrr said:
valexi, the only thing Ive seen suggested in your case is to reflash the firmware. I do not know of any other solutions for this, because pretty much everybody with this problem seems to have solved it when they changed the securestorage thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But when I reflash the firmware how can I set securestorage BEFORE installing permissive kernel as I don't have root to change build.prop?
valexi said:
But when I reflash the firmware how can I set securestorage BEFORE installing permissive kernel as I don't have root to change build.prop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't. Reflash, root, edit build.prop, reboot, set wifi password once again, reboot, it SHOULD be fine. If its not after this sequence, Im not sure what else may work. Every case of this particular problem that I've seen was resolved with this solution.
Luckily I didn't reflash yet. I checked again build.prop and securestorage was true. For some reason it didn't stick first time.
I edited it again and now WiFi works as intended. So I can say that this solution works. Great kernel.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Moderator Edit: Members should exercise caution when using potentially deprecated modifications such as this.
Hey! I'm @Da-BOSS or THEBOSS619 or 6.|THE|1|BOSS|.9 known on NBR forums & 4PDA & many other forums... I'm expert on tweaking anything from BIOS to Laptops to Drivers to Smartphones... lol even for smartwatches Developer on many projects,etc.... Anyway... I'm a person who likes stability & stock ROM over anything else.. who wants to have full control without causing any trouble while maintaining speed & quality of the ROM Welcome to my world were nothing is for free.. so.. I am here to offer the opposite... to offer something for free and from my own precious free time to XDA members... since I usually take what other developers do and optimize it & tweak it to my own liking but I never shared it to anyone... since I use it for my own benefits but... in my mind... I though that this action of sharing this ROM for Oreo Lovers :highfive: might make someone's day happy So.. I decided to share it here...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Main Info of this ROM:-
Rom Firmware:- N960FXXS2ARL4
BL or BootLoader:- N960FXXS2ARL4
CP or Modem:- N960FXXU2ARL2
CSC:- N960FOXM2ARK2 [OXM multi CSC package]
This ROM is based on DevBase ROM made by @_alexndr with every features that DevBase have and it is also purely stock without anything modified except that this Oreo ROM is updated from ARL3 to ARL4 since ARL4 have higher changelist than ARL3 so.. nobody tried to give Oreo a shot to update there roms to ARL4 so... I did it by myself and updated it to ARL4 while preserving all DevBase mods & features & options without causing any kind of issues or losing any kind of options that DevBase is offering
So... if you want to have an idea or informattion about Devbase features or mods.. @_alexndr already explained & described everything on his post ... here DevBase v6.0
The firmware obtained from Sammobile and being tested with my own Note 9 N960F device and it works without any kind of issues.. any issues you may encounter please.. report it and I will try to fix it as long as I have free time , Please understand.... I don't take requests... Thank you!
Credit and Thanks for:-
@_alexndr - Respected developer for unbelievable contribution to XDA/Android community across all devices
@Eamo5 - Respected developer for his amazing kernel & for his ideas and guidance plus his awesome kernel Endurance
@google - for being my best friend
Download Link...
Moderator Edit: Members should exercise caution when using potentially deprecated modifications such as this.
Download Links :-
Mega:- Mega Link
Google Drive:- Google Drive Link
If you need more mirrors.. just let me know.. but I think those are the best download links for downloading at maximum speed
ARL4 Bootloader Download link [ Flashed through Odin ]
Mega:- Mega Link
Google Drive:- Google Drive Link
Magisk Module to fix BT pair issues... [Flash it through Magisk Manager]
Mega:- Mega Link
I'm going to flash this one in a sec. I'm on Pie RomAur now and it's fine but I like Oreo UI more, also themes, xposed, viper and battery life with my particular usage was better on Oreo.
Since I always used ARL3 devbase with my own mods I might as well grab your ARL4 now
Da-BOSS said:
You won't regret.. there's a big difference between ARL3 & ARL4
You never know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder what i'm doing wrong.. I can't force the CSC as it says it isn't supported and it won't install because in TWRP it errors with Can't detect current CSC. I can install DB 5.9 ARL2 just fine with forced CSC for example. ALso ARL3 installation and TWRP nandroid backup work fine with PHN CSC but i can't in any way install your ROM..
Imprezzion said:
I wonder what i'm doing wrong.. I can't force the CSC as it says it isn't supported and it won't install because in TWRP it errors with Can't detect current CSC. I can install DB 5.9 ARL2 just fine with forced CSC for example. ALso ARL3 installation and TWRP nandroid backup work fine with PHN CSC but i can't in any way install your ROM..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you install without forcing CSC? the Devbase script will automatically keep your current CSC.. without touching it
It never happened when I tested with one of my friends Note 9 and on my own...
Are you doing it with (Format wipe [yes]) type ? Or without wiping? And also it maybe because your Bootloader is updated for PIE and not for Oreo
I flashed ARL4 official with Odin and even then with and without forcing CSC it keeps giving the same error.
Moving the system.img into the old zip of devbase ARL3 with alexandr's original script works fine with forced CSC and xposed. I installed the ARL4 BL from the official release through Odin as well. Now i basically have the same ARL4 with all options.
same here CSC error first time ever seeing that when i tried to flash
Getting the same issue here. Please see screenshot.
Tried installing debase 5.9 then reflashing this but same error. Tried with and without forced CSC.
Arobase40 said:
Nice to see there is still an Oreo update since I need to keep Magisk with Xposed Framework... :good:
I'd like to test and to flash your rom, but need to be sure it won't install a custom kernel but the stock one.
Then, would it be possible to have a zip file to customize your rom for a 7 or 8 icons dock ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every thing is stock.. same as Devbase I will see about having icon dock mods but I can't assure you that it will work
Imprezzion said:
I flashed ARL4 official with Odin and even then with and without forcing CSC it keeps giving the same error.
Moving the system.img into the old zip of devbase ARL3 with alexandr's original script works fine with forced CSC and xposed. I installed the ARL4 BL from the official release through Odin as well. Now i basically have the same ARL4 with all options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I did ! ok maybe because of the file naming that causing issues.. I uploaded a new one with renamed file... could you test that? Or or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
will6316 said:
same here CSC error first time ever seeing that when i tried to flash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to redownload again the file or or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
link it's been updated
ciaox said:
Getting the same issue here. Please see screenshot.
Tried installing debase 5.9 then reflashing this but same error. Tried with and without forced CSC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for providing the screen shot.... Try to redownload again the file.. it's been updated or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
Da-BOSS said:
That's what I did ! ok maybe because of the file naming that causing issues.. I uploaded a new one with renamed file... could you test that? Or or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
Try to redownload again the file or or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
link it's been updated
Thank you for providing the screen shot.... Try to redownload again the file.. it's been updated or rename the zip file to N960FXXS2ARL4_DevBase_v6.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not working so far. I changed the name.... no good. I redonloaded it from google.... no good same error. now im gonna try downloading from mega.....no good
Not working here either, I replaced the ARL3 system.img with the ARL4 one and installed it that way. Flashed ARL4 BL manually through Odin.
Phone Info said my BL is ARL4 however AP still shows as ARL3 so I don't know if it worked properly tho..
will6316 said:
not working so far. I changed the name.... no good. I redonloaded it from google.... no good same error. now im gonna try downloading from mega.....no good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Imprezzion said:
Not working here either, I replaced the ARL3 system.img with the ARL4 one and installed it that way. Flashed ARL4 BL manually through Odin.
Phone Info said my BL is ARL4 however AP still shows as ARL3 so I don't know if it worked properly tho..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok... I will temporary remove the download links until I fix it this weird bug.. it never happened during testing phase..
Da-BOSS said:
Ok... I will temporary remove the download links until I fix it this weird bug.. it never happened during testing phase..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
n960F or n960N ? N has smaller system partition size than F.
mabe these users are using N model and you are using dev base for n960F .( there are 2 dev bases.... one for F and one for N)
phone runs out of writing space and scripts fail at the end probably when csc part of the script is parsed. so it may have nothing to do with csc but with the system.img partition blocksize
---------- Post added at 01:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 AM ----------
will6316 said:
not working so far. I changed the name.... no good. I redonloaded it from google.... no good same error. now im gonna try downloading from mega.....no good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Imprezzion said:
Not working here either, I replaced the ARL3 system.img with the ARL4 one and installed it that way. Flashed ARL4 BL manually through Odin.
Phone Info said my BL is ARL4 however AP still shows as ARL3 so I don't know if it worked properly tho..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what phone model u guys have?
Imprezzion said:
Not working here either, I replaced the ARL3 system.img with the ARL4 one and installed it that way. Flashed ARL4 BL manually through Odin.
Phone Info said my BL is ARL4 however AP still shows as ARL3 so I don't know if it worked properly tho..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will6316 said:
not working so far. I changed the name.... no good. I redonloaded it from google.... no good same error. now im gonna try downloading from mega.....no good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bober10113 said:
n960F or n960N ? N has smaller system partition size than F.
mabe these users are using N model and you are using dev base for n960F .( there are 2 dev bases.... one for F and one for N)
phone runs out of writing space and scripts fail at the end probably when csc part of the script is parsed. so it may have nothing to do with csc but with the system.img partition blocksize
---------- Post added at 01:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 AM ----------
what phone model u guys have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well.. they have the N model.. well.. my title of this thread was clearly mention N960F/FD... I never mentioned N model so... yea.. maybe because they got the N model.. who knows
anyway... I uploaded a new file.. check on it.. report how it goes... I tested it 2 times on my device.. and it is working wonderfully without any TWRP errors...
I have the F model
Da-BOSS said:
well.. they have the N model.. well.. my title of this thread was clearly mention N960F/FD... I never mentioned N model so... yea.. maybe because they got the N model.. who knows
anyway... I uploaded a new file.. check on it.. report how it goes... I tested it 2 times on my device.. and it is working wonderfully without any TWRP errors...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tested on my n960n and fails right at the beginning by script check so no idea why people with F had issues.
Mines an F/DS. I'll redownload and check.
I have a F model too. took me a good 4hrs to restore a twrp backup after losing IMEI issue. i wont flash it till its all good on other users.
ciaox said:
I have a F model too. took me a good 4hrs to restore a twrp backup after losing IMEI issue. i wont flash it till its all good on other users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can only restore efs and carrier partitions.
#This is for android Pie..
After reading many topics abut the build.prop file and abut the VM and after many testing. finally i got somthing usefull in performance and battery friendly :fingers-crossed:.
Tested on s6 update and i think it will work with all update.the build.prop attached down here.
# how to:
- unzip the file and open the build.prop with any text editor.
- select all the text and copy.
- use mix explorer and go to system\vendor.
- open system\vendor\build.prop.
- select all text. Delete.
- now after that past what you copy before.
- press save. Then reboot to recovery.
- go to wipe..advanced wipe..and wipe both cach.
- reboot to system.
Post your results after testing:good:
Edit: some people get a problem when copy the all text in rhe bulid.prop file because the diffrent of the model and update.so i will post only the change i made in the codes then it will works with all models and updates and replace the numbers as the following:
Open system\vendor\build.prop
..and change the codes like this
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=160m
dalvik.vm.heapsize=512m
dalvik.vm.heaptargetutilization=0.625
Then scroll down and change like this
ro.config.dha_cached_min=2
ro.config.dha_cached_max=5
ro.config.dha_empty_min=4
ro.config.dha_empty_init=8
ro.config.dha_empty_max=15
ro.cfg.dha_cached_min=6
ro.cfg.dha_cached_max=15
ro.cfg.dha_empty_min=4
ro.cfg.dha_empty_init=17
ro.cfg.dha_empty_max=24
Thats it...now press save. Then reboot to recovery.
- go to wipe..advanced wipe..and wipe both cach.
- reboot to system.
Post the results please.good luck
#{Now for the stock Q} #
[ new update will have ## near the number ]
1_ *edit: new update .better battery life and performance. after tested :good:
open system\vendor\build.prop and replace the codes as the following:
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=160m
dalvik.vm.heaptargetutilization=0.625
ro.config.dha_cached_min=2
ro.config.dha_cached_max=5
ro.config.dha_empty_min=4
ro.config.dha_empty_init=8
ro.config.dha_empty_max=15
ro.cfg.dha_cached_min=6
ro.cfg.dha_empty_min=4
ro.cfg.dha_empty_init=16
and this
ro.cfg.freelimit_val=11 ## or 10
ro.cfg.dha_cached_max=12
ro.cfg.custom_sw_limit=200
ro.cfg.dha_empty_max=21 ## or 24
* after you replaced all these codes press save. Then reboot to recovery.
- go to wipe..advanced wipe..and wipe both cach.
- reboot to system.
thats is.. good luck for all with a good performance and a good battery life :good::fingers-crossed:
great job
Gollo99 said:
great job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.welcome any time:fingers-crossed:
86 download and just 2 voted?
I can only change system files using twrp
@hooooossamq I had some problems due to my phone being another model (SM-A205G), luckily I had a backup from the original file to restore. In this case I cannot vote =)
cizordj said:
@hooooossamq I had some problems due to my phone being another model (SM-A205G), luckily I had a backup from the original file to restore. In this case I cannot vote =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats problem you have with this method? I will copy my phone software inf
৭:-A
معلومات البرنامج (
إصدار One
1.1
Android lo!
إصدار النطاق الأساسي A205FDDS6ATA1
إصدار Kernel
44111
#1 Mon Dec 16 11:44:59 EST 2019
رقم الإصدار PPR 1180610011 A205FXXS6ATA1
حالة الأمان المحسن لنظام Android
Enforcing SEPF SM-A205F_9_0011 Mon Jan 06 15:42:41 2020
إصدار Knox
Knox 3.3 Knox API level 28 TIMA 4.1.0
إصدار برنامج مزود الخدمة SAOMC_SM-A205F_OJM_MID_PP_0014 RZ8M43C7CFV MID/MID, MID/MID
älaa |lzaliudal
I even using it with Ripper kernel .there is no problem and even do better than the stock kernel.
physwizz said:
I can only change system files using twrp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you can't change els system?
I make the vote to know if its work with all galaxy a20 .and if any one have any idea and edite the numbers of this build.prop file to make it better it will be great.but must be tested by the editor before sharing it here.
good luck for all...
@hooooossamq I got a bootloop for the first time I installed and then I restored the original build.prop and that didn't solve the problem, in the end I have to flash the whole firmware again. It's not your fault though. I guess the problem was caused by our phones being different, my bootloader is 5, yours is 6, my model is SM-A205G and yours is the F variant
cizordj said:
@hooooossamq I got a bootloop for the first time I installed and then I restored the original build.prop and that didn't solve the problem, in the end I have to flash the whole firmware again. It's not your fault though. I guess the problem was caused by our phones being different, my bootloader is 5, yours is 6, my model is SM-A205G and yours is the F variant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok then.i will post only the codes of what i change.to not make a copy of all the build.prop file so i think it will be save for all model's of a20
Edit: the codes in the first post
Q codes are coming
iam testing now some codes after updating to android Q stock one .and will share the
better performance build.prop method for Q here if any one want it .
till now i got the best codes for best performance and a good battery backup :good: and still testing
edit: the stock Q was good performance fast but a little laggy some time but the battery was draining so fast.so i change the codes many time and testing till i got the best
hooooossamq said:
# {Coming soon for android Q}.
#This is for android Pie..
After reading many topics abut the build.prop file and abut the VM and after many testing. finally i got somthing usefull in performance and battery friendly :fingers-crossed:.
Tested on s6 update and i think it will work with all update.the build.prop attached down here.
# how to:
- unzip the file and open the build.prop with any text editor.
- select all the text and copy.
- use mix explorer and go to system\vendor.
- open system\vendor\build.prop.
- select all text. Delete.
- now after that past what you copy before.
- press save. Then reboot to recovery.
- go to wipe..advanced wipe..and wipe both cach.
- reboot to system.
Post your results after testing:good:
Edit: some people get a problem when copy the all text in rhe bulid.prop file because the diffrent of the model and update.so i will post only the change i made in the codes as the following:
Open system\vendor\build.prop
..and change the codes like this
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=160m
dalvik.vm.heapsize=512m
dalvik.vm.heaptargetutilization=0.625
Then scroll down and change like this
ro.config.dha_cached_min=2
ro.config.dha_cached_max=5
ro.config.dha_empty_min=4
ro.config.dha_empty_init=8
ro.config.dha_empty_max=15
ro.cfg.dha_cached_min=6
ro.cfg.dha_cached_max=15
ro.cfg.dha_empty_min=4
ro.cfg.dha_empty_init=17
ro.cfg.dha_empty_max=24
Thats it...now press save. Then reboot to recovery.
- go to wipe..advanced wipe..and wipe both cach.
- reboot to system.
Post the results please.good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here I leave you others that are very useful
#Knox
ro.securestorage.knox=false
#Securestorsge
ro.securestorage.support=false
#Boot & Shutdown Animation FPS Boost
boot.fps=32
shutdown.fps=32
ro.config.dmverity=false
ro.config.kap=false
Q codes added
now the Q codes is ready in the first post :highfive: good luck :good:
hooooossamq said:
now the Q codes is ready in the first post :highfive: good luck :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just made changes to Ultimate Q
physwizz said:
Just made changes to Ultimate Q
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can use the same method and numbers for Ultimate Q too:good: .you can test and try
edit: or you mean that you already try it in Ultimate Q ROM? so if you try it.did you find it usefull?
hooooossamq said:
you can use the same method and numbers for Ultimate Q too:good: .you can test and try
edit: or you mean that you already try it in Ultimate Q ROM? so if you try it.did you find it usefull?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added a link to your thread here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-a20/how-to/android-10-q-guide-a20-t4095589
physwizz said:
I added a link to your thread here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-a20/how-to/android-10-q-guide-a20-t4095589
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh.ok iam happy .you are free to use it
hooooossamq said:
oh.ok iam happy you are free to use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a link to your thread
deleted