Hi sir,admins and moderators,I just want to ask about android cpu,I want to buy new phone,what should I get,Octa core Mediatek or Quadcore snap dragon? An android with 5 and above inch with 2 or 3gb ram,Asus,Vivo or Oppo?I like xiomi but I havnt tried yet so not now. I play a lots of PPSSPP Games and my problem is always about FPS.I dont hate SAMSUNG but What I always see in my cpu-z was no cpu on or all cpu was stopped and the governor is aknown.and unlike samsung I try to play others phone like Asus snap dragon,all quad core is on but the governor is in interactive and the Fps is in 40 and above,And other is Oppo, Octa core mediatek,Governor is in interactive but I only see one core is remaining on and the 4 core sometimes every 4 or 6 seconds they turn on and the other 3 core turn on only when other hard games is running,PPSSPP FPS is in 41 and above but when the phone gets lowbatt.it drops into 17 FPS and beIow.I think the snap dragon is in 1.7 Ghz and the mediatek is in 1.4 or 1.7 to? So Im asking what phone is the best to buy? T.Y
Related
The CPU in the atrix is Dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, so why i see ARMV7?
it's beacuse that the andorid 2.2 not support in dual core?
The atrix will use the dual core just in 2.3 andorid ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cortex-A9_MPCore
Cortex-A9 uses ARMv7.
I'm not sure Android 2.2 uses dual core but apps that use dual core can still use both cores even on 2.2. (AFAIK)
wtf???
wtf?? the nvidea already develop the other processors?
Tegra (Kal-El) series
Processor: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore, up to 1.5 GHz
Ultra Low Power CPU mode
40 nm by TSMC
Video output up to 2560x1600
NEON instruction sets from ARM
1080p H.264 High Profile video decode
12-Core Nvidia GPU with support for 3D stereo (12 unified shaders); about 5 times faster than Tegra 2[14]
To be released in the second half of 2011
[edit]Tegra (Wayne) series
Processor: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 MPCore ?
28 nm by TSMC ?
Improved GPU core: about 10 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2012
[edit]Tegra (Logan) series
Processor: ARM ?
Improved GPU core: about 50 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2013
[edit]Tegra (Stark) series
Processor: ARM ?
Improved GPU core: about 100 times faster than Tegra 2
To be released in 2014
thats ****ing nutz.....nvidea solt tegra 2 but of what I see they already have develop another processor ...nvidea don't realease the processor because they want do more money and a controled evolution......:S thats sucks...I want the last ARM power by tegra :'(
Every <THING> company that wants to survive is always working on the next-gen <THING> technology that is more advanced than their current <THING> technology.
Oh noes Toyota already has a new Prius for next year but wont sell it yet. And Apple already has a new MacBook but won't sell it yet. OMG coach has a new style bag and they are nit selling it yet.
Every company does this. Every company wants you to buy things now and then buy something else later. That is how companies make money.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Its a programmed obsolesency
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Asus told us that the original Transformer was dual core but its actually 1ghz for computing and 1ghz for graphics (which i guess is dual core but not in the way we all thought.).
Just hoping they dont pull something similar with the Prime...
jleewong said:
Asus told us that the original Transformer was dual core but its actually 1ghz for computing and 1ghz for graphics (which i guess is dual core but not in the way we all thought.).
Just hoping they dont pull something similar with the Prime...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? Not sure where you're pulling your information from, but Tegra 2 consists of a dual-core CPU with each core at 1Ghz and ULP GeFoce GPU running at 333Mhz.
Technically speaking its 5 cores and a gpu.
The Tegra 3, which the Prime has, consists of a 4 1.4GHz CPU cores along with another low-power core. It also has a 12 core GPU.
The TF101, the original transformer, had a Tegra 2. The Tegra 2 had 2 1GHz CPU cores and a 333MHz GPU core.
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tegra
I guess it really was dual core, awhile back when I first purchased a Viewsonic G-tablet (I've had every other tegra 2 tablet since) I read a review that said tegra 2 wasnt really dual core because it was using 1ghz for cpu and another 1ghz for gpu. But according to the tegra 2 wiki it really is dual core.
Still dont understand why my Archos 70 runs webpages and go launcher better, it only has a single core 1ghz cpu . Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Tegra 3 has the 4 cores and that single companion core, so it should have no problems I hope, expecially when ICS hits.
jleewong said:
I guess it really was dual core, awhile back when I first purchased a Viewsonic G-tablet (I've had every other tegra 2 tablet since) I read a review that said tegra 2 wasnt really dual core because it was using 1ghz for cpu and another 1ghz for gpu. But according to the tegra 2 wiki it really is dual core.
Still dont understand why my Archos 70 runs webpages and go launcher better, it only has a single core 1ghz cpu . Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Tegra 3 has the 4 cores and that single companion core, so it should have no problems I hope, expecially when ICS hits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Tegra 2 is two ARM A9 chips @ 1.00Ghz (and later on, 1.2Ghz) CPU alongside an 8 core GeForce GPU.
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.4GHz alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
xTRICKYxx said:
The Tegra 2 is two ARM A9 chips @ 1.00Ghz (and later on, 1.2Ghz) CPU alongside an 8 core GeForce GPU.
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.4GHz alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The The Tegra 3 is a four ARM A9 chips @ 1.3GHz (upto 1.4GHz in single core mode) alongside a 12 core GeForce GPU + a 5th underclocked A9 for power-saving features.
jleewong said:
Maybe it was honeycomb that made the tegra 2 seem slugish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably. They made a mistake of not making the home screen hardware accelerated. It's supposed to be fixed in ICS.
Hi all.
This is my first post here so forgive me if I've put it in the wrong forum.
I recently (6 days ago) bought a new phone, Ezio i95.
It looks like Samsung Galaxy S3/S4.
The specs are:
Quad core 1,8 GHz
2 GB RAM
Dual Sim
5" Super AMOLED screen (1920x1080), 440 ppi
But... In Antutu benchmark system info it correctly says that it is 1,8 GHz CPU (1741 MHz, to be precise). But, when I do the test, it sees only 1,2 GHz. When I try any app that does cpu scaling or any other cpu work, it also sees 1,2 GHz.
I searched for it on the net, but I didn't find anything conclusive. Actually, it seems that the CPU clock is really 1,2 GHz, but I don't know why and how do they sell it as 1,8. And how the hell Antutu sees it as 1,8?!?!?!
Here are screenshots:
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/9/kocl.png/
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/5/o0ph.png/
And here is from mediatek wiki:
MT6589[a] Cortex A7 (ARMv7) 28 nm 1.2*GHz quad-core PowerVR SGX544 @ 286*MHz
Any Ideas?!
Thanks in advance.
System won't let me to post a link, because I'm new, so I tried this workaround. Hope you don't mind. I've put two spaces.
blackbeast8 said:
Hi all.
This is my first post here so forgive me if I've put it in the wrong forum.
I recently (6 days ago) bought a new phone, Ezio i95.
It looks like Samsung Galaxy S3/S4.
The specs are:
Quad core 1,8 GHz
2 GB RAM
Dual Sim
5" Super AMOLED screen (1920x1080), 440 ppi
But... In Antutu benchmark system info it correctly says that it is 1,8 GHz CPU (1741 MHz, to be precise). But, when I do the test, it sees only 1,2 GHz. When I try any app that does cpu scaling or any other cpu work, it also sees 1,2 GHz.
I searched for it on the net, but I didn't find anything conclusive. Actually, it seems that the CPU clock is really 1,2 GHz, but I don't know why and how do they sell it as 1,8. And how the hell Antutu sees it as 1,8?!?!?!
Here are screenshots:
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/9/kocl.png/
h ttp://imageshack. us/f/5/o0ph.png/
And here is from mediatek wiki:
MT6589[a] Cortex A7 (ARMv7) 28 nm 1.2*GHz quad-core PowerVR SGX544 @ 286*MHz
Any Ideas?!
Thanks in advance.
System won't let me to post a link, because I'm new, so I tried this workaround. Hope you don't mind. I've put two spaces.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not familiar with the device or the ROM you are using (stock?). But if you install cpuspy it will tell you all the freqs that are allowed and how much time your cpu spends at each freq. My guess is that the freq table goes up to 1.8GHz but that somewhere the maxfreq is set to 1.2 GHz. You might be able to up the maxfreq using an app like setcpu. The cpu you have is rated to 1.2 GHz so any overclocking you do comes with the risk that you will damage your phone. Basically if the cpu is getting hot....better back off the overclocking.
justmpm said:
I am not familiar with the device or the ROM you are using (stock?). But if you install cpuspy it will tell you all the freqs that are allowed and how much time your cpu spends at each freq. My guess is that the freq table goes up to 1.8GHz but that somewhere the maxfreq is set to 1.2 GHz. You might be able to up the maxfreq using an app like setcpu. The cpu you have is rated to 1.2 GHz so any overclocking you do comes with the risk that you will damage your phone. Basically if the cpu is getting hot....better back off the overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every app I tried, including SetCPU and CpuSpy, shows 1,2 GHz as max frequency. As you can see on screenshots, Antutu benchmark shows in system info 1,8 GHz (1741 MHz actually), but in test it uses 1,2 GHz. TBH, the only place I saw 1,8 GHz was in Antutu, not anywhere else.
I contacted the seller, and he is trying to convince me that the phone has CPU Booster and that frequency is really 1,8 GHz. I now sent him screenshots in order to convince him that he is wrong...
I researched that cpu, mt5689 and its max freq is 1,2. mt5689T is 1,5 GHz, but this one is without T.
Kernel version is 3.4.5, from 19th June this year
Baseband version: MOLY.WR8.W1248.MD.WG.MP.V6.P4, 2013/05/04
Android version is 4.2.3
I found some info about ROM: 06_v89_hydy_dangdang_gemi
h ttp://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3662/kocl.png
h ttp://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4357/o0ph.png
If that anything means to you...
I am not trying to overclock my phone, I just want to be able to use what I've payed for. I could have bought 1,2 GHz, but I payed for this one and I want to use it, that's the poing...
Unfortunately, only after I bought it, I found all this. I didn't inform myself enough, before purchasing...
Thanks anyway
The seller is still trying to convince me that the max cpu freq is 1,8 GHz, with cpu booster, but I still cannot see or use it in any app, except that Antutu benchmark sees the 1,8 GHz as max, but still uses 1,2 GHz.
Chipset and cpu is rated to 1,2 GHz, as I saw on mt6589 reviews, so I think that I am fooled...
Good morning, my name is Jorge Martinez, I am another ezio buyer i95, I arrived with several flaws, the most serious the gps it is impossible to make it work, even after following many online tutorials.
The on / off button sometimes gets caught and resets.
The headphone connection is not good and sounds bad.
Reviewed this to the salesman told me they would give me support, etc, etc, told me I was going to wait to send another new model, gave me all kinds of options, but ultimately it only to gain time.
Once you pass the time of the vote, and has forgotten all its commitments and ripped me off.
I recommend everyone to not deal with the seller, who has only good words but deceives.
I hope my mistake serve for one to be saved from falling into this trap, but also effectively tells you it's quad core 1.8, it's actually 1.2.
Greetings all, I hope this information will be useful.
Demonstrating GPS reception via Device-Z-Test app. My S3 on the left and Ezio I95 on the right.
The latter, bought through eBay, was successfully returned to the Hong Kong exporter.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4
Ezio i95 Stock rom
Any one had ezio i95 stok rom?
ezio 95
hi,
I have read that some of the specs get rewritten within the operating system to fool antutu.
However I am also after a copy of the stock rom. I have a enzio s89 that I have bricked before I made a rom copy. This ezio i95 uses the same processor and is about the same size Maybe it will work in mine.
Are you able to download MTK droid tools and make a copy of your stock rom please. That is always worth doing in any case.
hai friend iam from india once i was a proud owner of i9300 ,gaming and only gaming was the only major thing doing on my phone amd mediatek announced mt6592 octa core chipset with mali450mp4gpu i planned to buy a phone powered by this new chipset on this jan 14th i brought a phone called"INTEX AQUA OCTA" a phone with mediatek MT6592 chipset ,the problem is when i play games like asphalt8 and gangstar 4 vegas i am not getting high graphics like when i play these games on i9300. there was an option to change the graphics properties on the game itself but the high and medium graphics are faded out. i rooted and installed cwm recovery on my phone and changed several model numbers in build.prop to aquire the high option setting on these gamese to turn on at last the GT-I9505 MODEL NUMBER IN BUILD.PROP turned on the high garphics mod in game setting but iam not getting the graphics contents like i play these games on galaxy s3 i thought that mali 450 mp4 is better than mali 400 gpu
what should i do to get graphics like galaxy s3 on my intex aqua octa powered by mali450mp4 gpu where should i modify to get graphics like that any help will be accepted like dust of gold i can seny u any part of the rom of intex aqua octa the benchmarks are also very impressive on antutu it scores more than galaxy s4 and in nenamark2 i got 60.3 fps and in fps meter when i play games like asphalt8 or gangstar vegas i get average 45fps the specfications of intex aqua octa is
MT6592 OCTA CORE 1.7GHZ WITH MALI450MP4 GPU 700MHZ
2GB RAM 16GB ROM
6" 720P IPS OGS DISPLAY
ANDROID 4.2.2 JELLYBEAN
i got latest mali450 gpu drivers any one tell me how to implement thes new drivers on my phone
please guys help me pleseeeee
You have to restart your phone after editing build.prop and reinstall the game from play store, but first try editing build.prop and clear data of asphlt 8 from settings
Hi,I Wanted To Buy A New Android Tablet At A Reasonable Price...
And I Found Asus Memo Pad HD7 On The Internet..
I Like The Specs Of This Tablet But I Don't Know If This Tablet Is Good For Gaming
So I Wanted To Know If This Tablet Is Good For Gaming ?..
Asus Memo Pad HD7 Main Specs :
Processor Type : 1.2 GHz Quad Core Cortex A7 MediaTek MT8125
Gpu : PowerVR SGX544
1 Gb Ram
________________________
I Used To Own Ainol Novo 7 Crystal 1 (Specs Below) And I Want To Know If Asus Memo Pad HD7 Will Be Better Then Ainol Novo 7 Crystal 1
Ainol Novo 7 Crystal 1 Main Specs
Cpu : Amlogic 8726-M6 Cortex-A9 Dual-core ARMv7 Processor
CPU Frequency: 1.5GHz
Gpu : Mali-400
1 Gb Ram
_____________________________
Thanks For Replying In Advance
Edit : There Is Another Tablet Called Ainol Novo 7 Crystal 2(Specs Below) So Should I Buy This One Or Asus Memo Pad HD7 ?
Ainol Novo 7 Crystal 2 Specs
Actions ATM7029 Quad Core 1.5Ghz
GPU : GC1000+
1 GB Ram
____________________________
From the PC Mag review of the Asus: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2422790,00.asp
The HD 7 is powered by a quad-core 1.2GHz MediaTek MT8125 processor with 1GB RAM. It's not the same as the Tegra 3 chip powering the original Nexus 7, but it delivers performance that is largely similar in most applications. Where it does falter, however, is gaming. It only managed 14 frames per second in the Taiji graphics benchmark and intensive games like N.O.V.A. 3 really tripped the HD 7 up, with load times in excess of five minutes and barely playable frame rates. General system performance is reliable and relatively speedy, matching the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 and besting the HP Slate 7. Web browsing scores were surprisingly solid, with a Sunspider score of 1470 milliseconds and a Browsermark score of 2191. None of these scores, however, can come close to the new Nexus 7, which absolutely dominates the MeMO Pad HD7 in the performance department. Navigating the system and launching apps didn't yield anything beyond your typical Android stutters and occasional lag. If you want the absolute best for reasonable money, that'll be the Nexus 7. If you want good enough for the least money, that'll be the HD 7.
For the Aionol Crystal: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Ainol-Novo-7-Crystal-Quad-Core-Tablet.92243.0.html
The SoC is built by the Chinese manufacturer Actions Semiconductor and is dubbed Actions ATM 7029. The manufacturer's website specifies four ARM Cortex A9 processors in this SoC, which would be a considerable powerhouse for this price. However, the cores' clock rate of 1 GHz is not very high. Ainol's Novo 7 Crystal Quad Core only offered a poor performance in the synthetic as well as processor benchmarks and constantly placed itself at the lower end.
For Crystal 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XM07JLrlU0
es0tericcha0s said:
From the PC Mag review of the Asus: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2422790,00.asp
The HD 7 is powered by a quad-core 1.2GHz MediaTek MT8125 processor with 1GB RAM. It's not the same as the Tegra 3 chip powering the original Nexus 7, but it delivers performance that is largely similar in most applications. Where it does falter, however, is gaming. It only managed 14 frames per second in the Taiji graphics benchmark and intensive games like N.O.V.A. 3 really tripped the HD 7 up, with load times in excess of five minutes and barely playable frame rates. General system performance is reliable and relatively speedy, matching the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 and besting the HP Slate 7. Web browsing scores were surprisingly solid, with a Sunspider score of 1470 milliseconds and a Browsermark score of 2191. None of these scores, however, can come close to the new Nexus 7, which absolutely dominates the MeMO Pad HD7 in the performance department. Navigating the system and launching apps didn't yield anything beyond your typical Android stutters and occasional lag. If you want the absolute best for reasonable money, that'll be the Nexus 7. If you want good enough for the least money, that'll be the HD 7.
For the Aionol Crystal: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Ainol-Novo-7-Crystal-Quad-Core-Tablet.92243.0.html
The SoC is built by the Chinese manufacturer Actions Semiconductor and is dubbed Actions ATM 7029. The manufacturer's website specifies four ARM Cortex A9 processors in this SoC, which would be a considerable powerhouse for this price. However, the cores' clock rate of 1 GHz is not very high. Ainol's Novo 7 Crystal Quad Core only offered a poor performance in the synthetic as well as processor benchmarks and constantly placed itself at the lower end.
For Crystal 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XM07JLrlU0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I Did Read And View Alot Of Reviews For These Devices But I Want A Suggestion From Someone Who Has Actually Used Any Of These Tablets Or Has Some Experience With Android Hardware(Cpu,Gpu Stuff)...