The mate 20 and 20 pro has wave 2 WiFi standard.
It should be 4x4 MIMO, but it seems my mate 20 only has 2x2.
Ater connecting to my Asus RT AC88U (4x4MIMO),
My Device only gets 866 Mbps link speed, which is only 2x2 MIMO.
Any ideas?
Related
picked it up from gamestop tonight. Dallas northpark location. manager said they were told today that docks would be coming from asus in about 2 weeks. he said asus has not even released them yet.
let me know if you have any other questions.
good build everything seems to be running properly. games and everything seem to be working as they should. screen appears fine.
the gamestop apps seem to be easily removable. under apps uninstall was available for all added on apps
ran wifi analyzer on three tablets, xoom running tiamat rom, my wifes stock transformer, and the prime that I updated fully. all numbers are in negative mv for those unfamiliar, lower is better.
order is t1, prime, xoom
20 feet from router, t1 52, tp 52, xo 53
upstairs, 30 feet from router, 2 walls 51, 60, 54
same floor 40 feet away, no walls 52, 60, 55
outside, 35 feet, brick wall 68, 74, 70
the prime is a little lower, but not a ton.
Thanks for the test results.
I read most of the posts here; but, seldom post. I wanted to determine how badly my WiFi drops off, if it in fact does. What follows is the result of my unscientific testing.
My Prime is serial BCOKASxxxxx.
I have a Linksys E4200 Wireless unit on the second floor of my wood framed house in Anchorage, Alaska.
With the prime approximately 4 feet from the router, I downloaded a 37Mb PDF two times and timed the process. One took 43 seconds, the the second took 41 seconds. I quickly went out of the house onto the edge of the street approximately 50 feet from the router and downloaded the same file two more times (from the same server). This time, the downloads took 124 seconds and 132 seconds. Browser used was Dolphin.
That seems to be a significant difference; but, I don't know what the numbers really mean.
I next repeated the test with my Dell XPS Laptop running the latest FireFox with a download accelerator running and obtained 19 seconds, and 23 seconds.
Out to the street (exact same location), and the times were 27 seconds and 32 seconds.
I did some math, and determined that the Prime took 3 times longer to download the same file at 50 feet from the router, than it did at 4 feet.
The Dell took 1.4 times as long.
Of course, there are variables (different browsers and a download accelerator); still, that seems to verify (at least to me) that the WiFi in the Prime is somewhat weaker than other devices (based on only a sample of one).
Jerry in Anchorage
I have a c2oka series prime. Made a comparison downloading a 37 MB file from my providers website (mysql.netvisao.pt) about 10 mts away from my belkin 600 router with my sgs2 and my prime, using Dolphin HD in both cases. The results were very clear! The prime took 1 min 25 secs to complete the download while the sgs2 did the same job in 40 seconds.
There is no doubt that something is very wrong with Prime's wifi.
1) this is a known issue, you could have posted this in the "known issues with prime" thread on the main page
2) time of download is irrelevant for this, why not just use the speedtest app that tells you how much bandwith you are getting in Mb/s? Test it at different distances 3x each distance, average the #s you have a good idea of exactly how much Mb/s bandwidth you lose/foot or w/e you want to do with the math.
So I recently upgraded from an older router, to a newer dual band 2.4, 5 N600 router and the connection speeds for my tablet are very low. I have a 30/30 connection speed and the prime is the only device that has download speeds at times of 200 kbps, up to about 12 mbps. I have adjusted the MTU, and I am wondering if anyone out there knows of a setting on the router that might be affecting the speed of the tablet. Also when I adjusted the MTU from 1500 to 1400 it greatly affected the Prime's speeds, I did get a couple of 1 kbps down load speed test before the adjustment.
Thanks.
Just searched through the Youtube and I found a lot of people comparing Poco F1 with Honor Play and Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 6gb in the battery drain test with PUBG, Asphalt 9, Clash of Clans, Youtube video browsing, Camera recording, Antutu benchmark test, etc.
Here's the link of the test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY_504wnbqU
Devices Tested:
Poco F1- 4000mah
OnePlus 6- 3300mah
Mi A2- 3000mah
Note 5 Pro- 4000mah
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 6gb- 5000mah
The result is:
Poco F1- 4 hours 53 min
OnePlus 6- 4 hours 21 min
Mi A2- 3 hours 42 min
Note 5 Pro- 4 hours 43 min
Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 6gb- 5 hours 51 min
For Asus, I can see when it did the Antutu Benchmark twice, the scores are totally different which are 109293 and 69845. Why is it so?
I saw someone commented that:
zenfone's SD 636 programmed to save battery on extended use. It's turn off Kryo performance cores and stays active with only 4 cortex A53 cores. That's why after 10% of charge the benchmark scores degrade in 69k points. While with performance core it scores 109k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does really Poco F1 survive less than 5 hours with these test? Anyone has any idea in this? Do share out if you have done any battery drain test.
I have my Tab S7+ connected to a 5ghz (wifi 6) network. And if I check the network connection on the tablet, its anywhere between 200 mbs and 350 mbs. This could be standing right next to the router. In comparison my Galaxy Note 20 Ultra gets anywhere from 800 mbs to 1.2 gbps. Why is the Tab S7+ so wifi so much weaker? Aren't they both using the same WIFI chipset?