Hi folks,
In the properties accessible via ADB, in one place it says the CPU is an Exynos 7885 and in another it claims it is a 7904:
Code:
[ro.arch]: [exynos7885]
[ro.board.platform]: [exynos5]
[ro.boot.hardware]: [exynos7885]
[ro.hardware]: [exynos7885]
[ro.hardware.chipname]: [exynos7904]
Are these the same part?
The specs for these SoCs look nearly identical.
Why is ro.hardware.chipname different from the rest?
Related
I've got a huawei update.app for my Huawei s7-701u (mediapad 7 youth) extracted on my PC, and I was looking at the parameters.txt from the firmware.
Prior to this, I've always assumed that it has an rk3168 processor, but when I looked at my device parameters.txt, I saw this:
FIRMWARE_VER:4.0.4
MACHINE_MODEL:rk30sdk
MACHINE_ID:007
MANUFACTURER:RK30SDK
MAGIC: 0x5041524B
ATAG: 0x60000800
MACHINE: 3066
CHECK_MASK: 0x80
KERNEL_IMG: 0x60408000
RECOVER_KEY: 0,1,D,1,0
COMBINATION_KEY: 0,1,D,0,0
CMDLINE: loglevel=0 console=ttyS2 androidboot.console=ttyS2 init=/init initrd=0x62000000,0x00800000 mtdparts=rk29xxnand:[email protected](misc),
[email protected](kernel),[email protected](boot),
[email protected](recovery),[email protected](backup),
[email protected](oeminfo),[email protected](vrcb),
[email protected](nvme),[email protected](modemnv),
[email protected](modemnv2),[email protected](modemimage),
[email protected](cache),[email protected](userdata),
[email protected](kpanic),[email protected](system),
[email protected](cust),[email protected](reserve1),[email protected](reserve2),[email protected](data)
Now, does this mean that my device is running an rk3066 chipset, based on this information, especially the machine : 3066 part?
A little google researching has pointed out that the rk3168 is a 1.2 GHz processor, while the rk3066 is a 1.6 GHz processor. For the record, GSM arena, the huawei site and An app for setting CPU speeds all say that my device has a 1.6 GHz processor, further supporting that my device indeed has an rk3066 chipset.
What do you guys say?
Hello All,
I am looking at building my own rom for my tablet after playing with it for a while it seems sluggish even with the quadcore CPU, would anyone be able to point me in the right direction?
I would like to know where to start I am willing to learn the rest on my own.
Here are the specs of the device:
Processor:
Processor Chipset: Rockchip RK3126
Processor: Quadcore Cortex A7 1.3 GHz
Instruction Sets: armeabi-v7a, armeabi
GPU:
GPU: ARM Mali-400MP
OpenGL Version: OpenGL ES 2.0
Audio Chip:
Audio Chipset: Rk30sdk
RAM:
RAM: 512 MB
The sensor information on the device states Android Open Source Project or AOSP on each one which suggests that a custom rom is all ready on the device, would someone be able to point me in the correct direction for the firmware binaries so that I could build a generic rom for the device?
Here is more information on the device itself from the manufacturer http://www.time2direct.com/android-...944b-9-quadcore-android-kitkat-tablet-pc.html
I've emailed them but I haven't had a response from them.
I have found these two links which I believe to be correct for the device
http://malideveloper.arm.com/resources/drivers/open-source-mali-gpus-linux-kernel-device-drivers/
http://www.arm.com/products/processors/cortex-a/cortex-a7.php
Hello !
I need Flashfile for a China Clone of a Samsung S7.
Perhaps a file is called MT6580__alps__best6580_weg_l__best6580_weg_l__5.1__ALPS.L1.MP6.V2_BEST6580.WEG
BBchip: MT6580
MS Board: best6580_weg_l
ms board name:
A889_V1.0 T
2016 3 28
EMMC 512МБ / 4Gb
MS board foto:
pixic.ru/i/w0t18348U6r599E3.jpg
Please I need this firmware
Hi to all!
Exynos 7580 is a 64bit CPU. I don't know why Samsung made a 32bit system for this A53 CPU. I want to use the lastest Google Camera, but it only supports arm64. So I try to port a 64bit system for my A710F.
I found an A720F lineage OS, and got the files about arm64, like lib64, app_process64,etc. I packed them and flashed it, and my device booted successfully. Then, I put a 64bit camera in /system/app, and it worked successfully, too. But the problem is, I want to install a 64bit software. So I need to modify build.prop.
First time, I entered:
# ro.product.cpu.abi and ro.product.cpu.abi2 are obsolete,
# use ro.product.cpu.abilist instead.
ro.product.cpu.abi=arm64-v8a
ro.product.cpu.abilist=arm64-v8a,armeabi-v7a,armeabi
ro.product.cpu.abilist32=armeabi-v7a,armeabi
ro.product.cpu.abilist64=arm64-v8a
ro.product.manufacturer=samsung
ro.product.locale=en-US
ro.wifi.channels=
Failed to boot. Zygote failed.
Second time, I entered:
# ro.product.cpu.abi and ro.product.cpu.abi2 are obsolete,
# use ro.product.cpu.abilist instead.
ro.product.cpu.abi=armeabi-v7a
ro.product.cpu.abi2=arm64-v8a
ro.product.cpu.abilist=armeabi-v7a,arm64-v8a-armeabi
ro.product.cpu.abilist32=armeabi-v7a,armeabi
ro.product.cpu.abilist64=arm64-v8a
ro.product.manufacturer=samsung
ro.product.locale=en-US
ro.wifi.channels=
The system ui worked no more than 1 second, then fc.
So, I replace it with A720 system ui, but it still fc, and didn't work at all.
There's no a exynos 7580 device running 64bit system, but if there's a device very similar to our device? No only change these things, but also port others. Is it possible? I want to try.
Do you have any ideas? Please discuss it with me!
Thats a good idea, waiting for another people replies
DF11GB said:
I found an A720F lineage OS, and got the files about arm64, like lib64, app_process64,etc. I packed them and flashed it, and my device booted successfully. Then, I put a 64bit camera in /system/app, and it worked successfully, too. But the problem is, I want to install a 64bit software. So I need to modify build.prop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is just a small part of a full 64 bit operating system. In order to run 64 bit apps, system etc. you'll have to care about the other factors too.
The main part of a full 64 bit system requires a 64 bit supported:
- kernel
- ramdisk
- OS: framework and core apps
- libaries
- system binaries (system/bin)
- vendors
The Galaxy A 2016 series only fulfills one of these factors: kernel.
It's possible to port 64 bit system but only if there is an another Sammy device shipped with full 64 bit support and with same SoC as the Galaxy A 2016 series.
deleted..
xXPR0T0TYPEXx said:
Well this is just a small part of a full 64 bit operating system. In order to run 64 bit apps, system etc. you'll have to care about the other factors too.
The main part of a full 64 bit system requires a 64 bit supported:
- kernel
- ramdisk
- OS: framework and core apps
- libaries
- system binaries (system/bin)
- vendors
The Galaxy A 2016 series only fulfills one of these factors: kernel.
It's possible to port 64 bit system but only if there is an another Sammy device shipped with full 64 bit support and with same SoC as the Galaxy A 2016 series.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung a9 2016 supports android 8. Can the software be ported to a5 2016?
https://samdb.org/tr/model/SM-A910F/
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...2016)-7903.php
xpity34 said:
Samsung a9 2016 supports android 8. Can the software be ported to a5 2016?
https://samdb.org/tr/model/SM-A910F/
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gal...2016)-7903.php
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. It runs Qualcomm MSM8976 while A5 2016 runs Exynos 7580 soc.
why to be used google camera any benefits of google camera...?
A7 2016 have the same soc,a3 2016 and Samsung Galaxy View Tablet too (exynos7580)
The Galaxy S5 Neo Sm-G903F is the first smartphone with SoC Exynos 7580, all others devices based on the same soc are derived from it, and it didn't receive 64bit Android OS, only 32bit. It would be nice to have a 64bit version, but this would require to start from ground zero if there is no sourcecode from the other parts required to run in 64bit.
Hi,
I've just purchased a Pad 6 Pro Tablet with the following claimed spec: Android 11 Inch 120Hz WQHD+ Snapdragon 870 + 10000mAh
I've installed both DevCheck and Aida64 to double check I wasn't scammed (AliExpress seller...)
They both show absolutely different specifications:
How can this be, and which one is right???!
DevCheck:
CPU: Mediatek MT6750 - MT6750V/C (and NOT snapdragon 870)
Android: 8.1.0 Oreo and NOT 11
GPU: ARM Mali-T860
Aida64:
CPU: Snapdragon 870
Android: 11
GPU: ARM Mali-T860
Maybe a fake one then. Check the files in the root - dev - proc if there is qcom or mtk texts in their names.
If it's MTK, you might be able to root it with Amazing temp root, mtk-su.
Bought a faked one years ago. Back then the faking data of these MTK devices was on the proinfo partition. Don't remember much but there was some Russian youtube video about.
check baseband. yet another app.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ru.andr7e.deviceinfohw
krispil said:
Hi,
I've just purchased a Pad 6 Pro Tablet with the following claimed spec: Android 11 Inch 120Hz WQHD+ Snapdragon 870 + 10000mAh
I've installed both DevCheck and Aida64 to double check I wasn't scammed (AliExpress seller...)
They both show absolutely different specifications:
How can this be, and which one is right???!
DevCheck:
CPU: Mediatek MT6750 - MT6750V/C (and NOT snapdragon 870)
Android: 8.1.0 Oreo and NOT 11
GPU: ARM Mali-T860
Aida64:
CPU: Snapdragon 870
Android: 11
GPU: ARM Mali-T860
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its obvious fake. Snapdragon 870 ships with adreno 650 GPU. Mediatek MT6750 ships with mali graphics