Trying to edit my init.rc to mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p2 on boot, starting to think beating myself to death with the phone would be easier. I have followed the tutorial here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=443994
And tried the alternate method listed here:
http://android-dls.com/wiki/index.php?title=HOWTO:_Unpack,_Edit,_and_Re-Pack_Boot_Images
But no matter what I do the image never repacks right, I'm only changing 1 line so the file size should stay the same, but when I repack, I get 3.5mb with splitimg, 3.6mb when trying repack-boot.img, 4.4mb when using mkbootimg, and I'm starting off with a 4.2mb boot.img. Even weirder, when I use the splitimg method, the old and new boot.img.ramdisk.gz are the same size, I use the same kernel, and it still repacks a different size than the original. Erasing everything every time to make sure no files are being overwritten. Using ubuntu 9.10. What could cause a different file size and non-booting image each time? Also, when I use the split_bootimg script on the new file, the kernel & ramdisk are the same size. So does that mean it's throwing out data not related to those 2 things, and that's what's killing it? Or is it like the Nexus, where you have to add --base to mkbootimg, and if so, where do I get the number to go with --base?
Watch the video in my signature it'll help you
Thanks, I was already doing it right, but watching your video I decided to redownload the files you had, my mkbootfs was corrupting the ramdisk, it is a good tutorial though, easy to follow even without sound.
I had downloaded a version of this file from a post embedded deep inside one of the threads over here (sorry can't find it right now), but upon examination of its contents, I discovered some issues:
1. The checksums on the files in contained in the the original zip file showed that B&N had at least two versions of 1.3.0 update you can download from them, and the zip I got contained an older version so I put in the latest files in there.
2. There were unnecessary files included inside the original zip file, I deleted those, and only included what was needed.
3. There were errors in the script syntax, which I corrected, so that the proper commands are run during the update, and the proper sed substitutions are made during the editing of the unpacked init.rc inside the ramdisk.
What this zip will do is replace any older version of a B&N ROM on the alternate eMMC partitions of a dual booting configurations to the latest versions. This will prevent B&N from pushing the 1.3.0 update to you OTA, and messing up your dual boot setup. Just put the zip on your sdcard, boot into CWM recovery, and apply the zip. I apologize in advance for not giving credit to the original creators of the scripts here.
Note: There have been two different protocols for a dual booting u-boot.bin, with an older one relying on the files u-boot.altimg, and u-boot.altram to specify the names of the secondary boot ramdisk and kernel, and a newer one assuming that they are named uAltRam, and uAltImg respectively. This update conforms to the new u-boot.bin protocol. If you are still using the old one, you will have to get root access to /boot and edit the two files to point to uAltRam and uAltImg.
So if you want try it out, here it is:
http://www.mediafire.com/?gcrpzzc0kdoxcjx
MD5 Sum: 51e24c1e5eff11ba5ea481a63f7404eb
Update
I have now uploaded files for B&N Update 1.4.1.
The first file (MD5 Sum: 4ff1d9764663278c3f51e2e2c9d841a6) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on secondary /system through CWM:
https://rapidshare.com/files/52135913/secondary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1.zip
The second file (MD5 Sum: c1506816fbfb8c419fbbc4afe1b12887) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on primary /system through CWM without messing with recovery;
https://rapidshare.com/files/869435270/primary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1_keep_CWM.zip
The third file (MD5 Sum: ab1307c55a2c35c91d339c8037ce9a78) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on primary /system through CWM, replacing recovery and all:
https://rapidshare.com/files/2059644016/primary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1.zip
None of these files will wipe user apps and data, so if you wish to do that, boot into recovery and wipe from there. [This will work on primary /data partition only]
Please note: If the B&N Stock ROM is rooted, you will lose root upon updating.
Thanks!
This worked beautifully! I flashed it from my sdcard after booting into CWM on my primary partition on emmc.
I'm betting you got the original from jasoraso in this dual boot thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=17122342&postcount=142
What I would love is a straight CWM-flashable 1.3 ROM, to include in my up-to-date (for now) guide for setting up the dual boot, rather than having to set up and move 1.2, then update to 1.3.
That is possible to do by combining three of the steps. You need commands from the scripts from the prepare dual boot zip to resize /media and create the secondary system and data partitions, then the part of the script from the file that copies the contents of /data from primary to secondary and replaces u-boot.bin , and then my file which formats secondary /system and puts 1.3.0 there, and copies the latest kernel and patched ramdisk onto /boot. I can put such a file together, but I wouldn't be able to test it. The Nook belongs to my wife, and and you get the rest of the drift.
PS - You can use my file as is after running prepare dual boot and copy stock to secondary. It is not necessary to update secondary to 1.2 before going to 1.3.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
rajendra82 said:
That is possible to do by combining three of the steps. You need commands from the scripts from the prepare dual boot zip to resize /media and create the secondary system and data partitions, then the part of the script from the file that copies the contents of /data from primary to secondary and replaces u-boot.bin , and then my file which formats secondary /system and puts 1.3.0 there, and copies the latest kernel and patched ramdisk onto /boot. I can put such a file together, but I wouldn't be able to test it. The Nook belongs to my wife, and and you get the rest of the drift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait...what? What I'm talking about is a 1.3 zip made to work with CWM and in no way doctored to account for dual booting, just like the 1.2 zip one would otherwise use.
rajendra82 said:
PS - You can use my file as is after running prepare dual boot and copy stock to secondary. It is not necessary to update secondary to 1.2 before going to 1.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tested this theory? I found that when I did not register my B&N install while it was on the primary partition, I was unable to boot into it on the secondary partition.
Taosaur said:
Wait...what? What I'm talking about is a 1.3 zip made to work with CWM and in no way doctored to account for dual booting, just like the 1.2 zip one would otherwise use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about updating an already rooted 1.0/1.1/1.2 Nook Color. I am sure the scripting to do that is exactly the same as what is in the 1.2 zip file. Just replace the 1.2 files inside the zip with the equivalent files from the 1.3 update. Make sure the portions which install su and busybox are included, and build.prop spoofig is applied. I am not sure it is worth it building such a zip file though. One is better off just applying the B&N update, and then rerooting with manual nooter. What I created was for people that have already doctored the setup for dual booting. In such a case, the B&N update would either fail, or would replace the primary partition instead.
Taosaur said:
Have you tested this theory? I found that when I did not register my B&N install while it was on the primary partition, I was unable to boot into it on the secondary partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No way to get around having to register the primary partition image first. Once that is done it could be moved to secondary and then updated straight to 1.3 instead of going 1.2 first.
I have a dual boot eMMC NC. I am not sure which setup I use but the last time I updated the CM7 nightly, I lost the dual boot until I installed the u-Boot again. I suspect I have the setup that looks for altFImg. So this is not going to work for me. I have 1.2 rooted which I use only occasionally. I am not even sure what is in 1.3 but I am curious.
yelloguy said:
I have a dual boot eMMC NC. I am not sure which setup I use but the last time I updated the CM7 nightly, I lost the dual boot until I installed the u-Boot again. I suspect I have the setup that looks for altFImg. So this is not going to work for me. I have 1.2 rooted which I use only occasionally. I am not even sure what is in 1.3 but I am curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you need to do is boot into CM7, mount /boot as root, and then rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam, and then change the text inside u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to point to the new names instead of the old ones. This will keep you dual booting under the old u-boot.bin, and even after a new protocol u-boot.bin (like that installed by CM7) gets pushed to your Nook Color. Once you have done that, you can update the secondary to 1.3 using my zip file if you want.
rajendra82 said:
Are you talking about updating an already rooted 1.0/1.1/1.2 Nook Color. I am sure the scripting to do that is exactly the same as what is in the 1.2 zip file. Just replace the 1.2 files inside the zip with the equivalent files from the 1.3 update. Make sure the portions which install su and busybox are included, and build.prop spoofig is applied. I am not sure it is worth it building such a zip file though. One is better off just applying the B&N update, and then rerooting with manual nooter. What I created was for people that have already doctored the setup for dual booting. In such a case, the B&N update would either fail, or would replace the primary partition instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't know what to change and what to leave alone, myself, but I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. I'm talking about installing 1.3 using CWM, regardless of how the device is partitioned or what was on the primary partition previously. Like the files in this thread, but 1.3: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520.
I understand that you were just cleaning up jaso's update-dualboot-to-1.3 file. I used the original and it worked fine, but it would have saved me a couple steps (and would be more useful in a guide for setting up dualboot) to simply install 1.3 rather than 1.2 to the primary partition when setting up. The reason I started with 1.2 is because it is the most current stock ROM available for CWM. What I would like is to avoid a historical re-enactment of stock OS development altogether. A general-purpose, CWM-flashable 1.3 ROM would be broadly useful, but is so far lacking as far as I've seen.
1. Do you envision this to be an uprooted stock 1.3 update ROM (either as primary or the only boot option) ? I just don't see the need for this to be CWM flashable. It is very easy to get there by resetting the device to stock, and then updating the device to 1.3.0 using the B&N file, and restoring dual boot as need be. If one has any older stock ROM running on primary, the B&N update will get them to 1.3 while losing root. There is no need to apply 1.2 update first.
2. Do you envision this to be for already rooted single or primary booting 1.1/1.2 users? There is once again no need to create any file for this. One can simply apply the B&N update, and then rerun manual nooter, and restore dual booting to the secondary.
3. The only users with no clear upgrade path are those who have already moved the B&N ROM to secondary. That's why I fixed up the zip file, and shared it. I am glad the original file worked for you despite the script errors. I can see other setups where it would have failed though.
I am not trying to make this more complicated than it needs to be. The Nook Color is just capable of being set up in so many ways, there isn't simply going to be a single update method that will work in all scenarios.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'm envisioning it as a one step, starting-point-agnostic means of establishing a 1.3 stock install, whether for setting up a dualboot or for any other purpose. Its usefulness is made evident by the three-page thread devoted to CWM-flashable 1.2 images: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520
Taosaur said:
I'm envisioning it as a one step, starting-point-agnostic means of establishing a 1.3 stock install, whether for setting up a dualboot or for any other purpose. Its usefulness is made evident by the three-page thread devoted to CWM-flashable 1.2 images: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then the best bet is two step process:
1. Wipe device and restore to factory stock.
2. Download B&N 1.3 update file from website and place it on the root of SD card. Let the device recognize it, and apply it.
Once the 1.3 update gets applied, you are free to reroot, install CWM, set up dual booting, or whatever the next step may be.
It is the only method that will work in all circumstance as it involves starting from scratch regardless of setup. If want to preserve any of your current setup, no one step file will work for all circumstances. Some people have the stock firmware rooted, others do not. Some have the stock as the only internal boot, others have it as primary option of a dual booting configuration, while others have it as a secondary option. Some have stock recovery and run CWM off the sdcard when needed and want to update their recovery to the latest stock version, others want to keep the CWM recovery, and not update the recovery. There simply is no way file to cope with all these options.
rajendra82 said:
All you need to do is boot into CM7, mount /boot as root, and then rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam, and then change the text inside u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to point to the new names instead of the old ones. This will keep you dual booting under the old u-boot.bin, and even after a new protocol u-boot.bin (like that installed by CM7) gets pushed to your Nook Color. Once you have done that, you can update the secondary to 1.3 using my zip file if you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You lost me at mount
Seriously, I am trying to see if what I have is compatible with your update before I apply the update. I have a couple of useful apps on my CM7 and I have lost the password. I don't want to be stuck without CM7 or start over again. I can live without the 1.3 update though. So I want to make sure I am up to the task of finding and renaming these files if I have to.
With that said, how do I mount the /boot partition? I go into terminal emulator and give the su command. Then I tried mount /boot but that didn't work.
Thanks for your help.
rajendra82 said:
1. Wipe device and restore to factory stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...the only means of doing so "that will work in all circumstance" and in any way resembles a single step is flashing a stock zip via CWM. Why not use an up-to-date zip? The usefulness of such files is demonstrated by the fact that:
such files exist for past stock versions
those files are in use
files like yours are used to work around the non-existence of up-to-date stock zips
If you're so comfortable working with update files, you very likely could have produced such a file in less time than you've spent rationalizing away the clearly demonstrated need for them. Tell you what, in all likelihood I can just swap a few files from B&N's 1.3 zip into the existing CWM-flashable 1.2 zips, correct? Which files do I replace?
Anyone?
---------- Post added at 02:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:58 PM ----------
yelloguy said:
You lost me at mount
Seriously, I am trying to see if what I have is compatible with your update before I apply the update. I have a couple of useful apps on my CM7 and I have lost the password. I don't want to be stuck without CM7 or start over again. I can live without the 1.3 update though. So I want to make sure I am up to the task of finding and renaming these files if I have to.
With that said, how do I mount the /boot partition? I go into terminal emulator and give the su command. Then I tried mount /boot but that didn't work.
Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know for sure, but wouldn't rajendra's update create properly-named boot files alongside the old, improperly named ones? Wouldn't the multiboot built in to recent CM7 builds then look for and boot from the more recent, properly named files? I can't confirm that's how it would work, but it's what I would expect.
Taosaur said:
I don't know for sure, but wouldn't rajendra's update create properly-named boot files alongside the old, improperly named ones? Wouldn't the multiboot built in to recent CM7 builds then look for and boot from the more recent, properly named files? I can't confirm that's how it would work, but it's what I would expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
The fix is simple: to rename the files. But I need to know how before I take the plunge.
yelloguy said:
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, but if you run a CM7 update, it would replace your uboot again. I'm not saying do it, just wondering out loud if it would work.
yelloguy said:
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
The fix is simple: to rename the files. But I need to know how before I take the plunge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In order to rename the files, you can do the following:
1. Boot into CM7 (or any other place where you have command line root access)
2. Create a temporary directory at a location where you have read write access.
3. Type su in a terminal session to gain root access and then mount mmcblk0p1 at the temporary location you created using the command:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 <full path to the directory you created>
4. Now use Astro to go over to the directory you created and mounted mmcblk0p1 into. You should see:
u-boot.bin which is the bootloader
u-boot.bin.stock which is the backup of the old stock bootloader
uImage and uRamdisk which are your primary kernel and ramdisk
uFImg and uFRam which are your secondary kernel and ramdisk (and whose names are mismatching the CM7 bootloader protocol)
u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram, which are text files per the old bootloader method containing names of uFImg and uFRam
5. Rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam. And edit the contents of u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to match the new file names.
6. Reboot as usual into primary or secondary.
Now if an CM7 update ever replaces your u-boot.bin, you will not lose dual boot, as you have it set up as uAltImg and uAltRam per the new protocol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
---------- Post added at 03:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:06 PM ----------
Taosaur said:
...the only means of doing so "that will work in all circumstance" and in any way resembles a single step is flashing a stock zip via CWM. Why not use an up-to-date zip? The usefulness of such files is demonstrated by the fact that:
such files exist for past stock versions
those files are in use
files like yours are used to work around the non-existence of up-to-date stock zips
If you're so comfortable working with update files, you very likely could have produced such a file in less time than you've spent rationalizing away the clearly demonstrated need for them. Tell you what, in all likelihood I can just swap a few files from B&N's 1.3 zip into the existing CWM-flashable 1.2 zips, correct? Which files do I replace?
Anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry if you think I am rationalizing, but that was not my intention. I just wanted to point out that the files you linked to do not meet your own criteria.
Take for example the file update-nc-stock-1.2-keepcwm-signed.zip that you point to as missing in an up to date 1.3 version. That file will update a Nook Color to 1.2, but will keep CWM recovery. It however will make someone whose Nook Color 1.1 was rooted using autonooter lose root. A person that has been dualbooting to CM7 on secondary will lose that ability as well after applying that update. So unlike what you think, this is not a file to update stock 1.2 update under all circumstances regardless of what the starting point is. It has a specific use (update fro, a pre 1.2 stock primary eMMC boot, no dualboot, CWM recovery installed). Creation of an all situation stock restore file is impossible IMO, and the best you can do is wipe and apply 1.3 B&N stock update. You or I could technically create another equivalent file with update-nc-stock-1.3-keepcwm.zip /system files, kernel, ramdisk, etc., but this file would be subject to the same side effects as the original.
---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------
Taosaur said:
Right, but if you run a CM7 update, it would replace your uboot again. I'm not saying do it, just wondering out loud if it would work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would work. If you apply my zip, there will be a uAltImg and uAltRam in /boot (in addition to uFImg and uFRam). If you apply another update that pushes the CM7 bootloader, it will then look for these files with trying to do an alternate boot, and would boot into a unrooted stock 1.3.
rajendra82 said:
In order to rename the files, you can do the following:
1. Boot into CM7 (or any other place where you have command line root access)
2. Create a temporary directory at a location where you have read write access.
3. Type su in a terminal session to gain root access and then mount mmcblk0 at the temporary location you created using the command:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0 <full path to the directory you created>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get an error:
mounting <paths> failed: Device or resource busy
Any ideas?
yelloguy said:
I get an error:
mounting <paths> failed: Device or resource busy
Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see a typo in my command (stupid Swiftkey X). It should be:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 <some directory>
Also try typing just mount in terminal to see if /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 is already mounted somewhere else.
rajendra82 said:
Take for example the file update-nc-stock-1.2-keepcwm-signed.zip that you point to as missing in an up to date 1.3 version. That file will update a Nook Color to 1.2, but will keep CWM recovery. It however will make someone whose Nook Color 1.1 was rooted using autonooter will lose root. A person that has been dualbooting to CM7 on secondary will lose that ability as well after applying that update. So unlike what you think, this is not a file to update stock 1.2 update under all circumstances regardless of what the starting point is. It has a specific use (update fro, a pre 1.2 stock primary eMMC boot, no dualboot, CWM recovery installed). Creation of an all situation stock restore file is impossible, and the best you can do is wipe and apply 1.3 B&N stock update. You or I could technically create another equivalent file with update-nc-stock-1.3-keepcwm.zip /system files, kernel, ramdisk, etc., but this file would be subject to the same side effects as the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Riiiiight... it would install stock 1.3 to the device. That's the intended behavior. The point is to avoid the unnecessary step of updating in any process that includes flashing stock to the sole or primary partition. One example of such a process would be a fresh dual boot setup. That it does not update or otherwise rely upon an existing install is the point.
Granted, such a file would not repartition the device, but it would install up-to-date stock in one step regardless of how a device is partitioned (1/5, 2/5, 5/1 or dual boot).
Would this be a possible solution to our kernel flashing problems, I know it works for the evo
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
Would this be a possible solution to our kernel flashing problems, I know it works for the evo
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's possible. In fact I mentioned this about a month ago to a developer.
I would like to see one that has a couple of options such as flashing recovery and flashing boot.img files.
You can easy push the flash_image binary to /system/bin and set the permission to 755. In fact my CWMFaux kernel does just that. Faux stopped using it because it doesn't always work.
In fact I made it so easy that all you need to do is push the boot.img to /system and reboot. Yet... no one uses it. In fact I suggested to a couple of rom developers to simply add the binary file to /system/bin so that you can at least run the command from terminal but they don't even want to do that. I like being able to update my recovery at anytime by entering "flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery.img" and then just rebooting to recovery. You can easily do that for kernels too. But I suppose it's so much easier to carry a computer around.
Binary100100 said:
It's possible. In fact I mentioned this about a month ago to a developer.
I would like to see one that has a couple of options such as flashing recovery and flashing boot.img files.
You can easy push the flash_image binary to /system/bin and set the permission to 755. In fact my CWMFaux kernel does just that. Faux stopped using it because it doesn't always work.
In fact I made it so easy that all you need to do is push the boot.img to /system and reboot. Yet... no one uses it. In fact I suggested to a couple of rom developers to simply add the binary file to /system/bin so that you can at least run the command from terminal but they don't even want to do that. I like being able to update my recovery at anytime by entering "flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery.img" and then just rebooting to recovery. You can easily do that for kernels too. But I suppose it's so much easier to carry a computer around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im going to contact joeykrim and see if I can get him to add support in his app, and Ive been using your method since I got the phone (2 days ago) and started reading, but still a little hassle, and a big htc fail
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
Im going to contact joeykrim and see if I can get him to add support in his app, and Ive been using your method since I got the phone (2 days ago) and started reading, but still a little hassle, and a big htc fail
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep me posted will ya?
I believe that Faux and other developers would have to use the zImage kernel flashing technique to get it to work with his existing app but I'm sure he can simplify it to accept .img files and the .ko files in the /system/lib directory of a zip file. It actually should be very easy. It took me about ten mintues with testing included to create the script for my method. I just can't code for apps else it would be done by now.
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
Im going to contact joeykrim and see if I can get him to add support in his app, and Ive been using your method since I got the phone (2 days ago) and started reading, but still a little hassle, and a big htc fail
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I contacted pershoot, no answer lol!!!
Joeykrim is willing to support the Amaze, he just needs testers, this would be a great backup incase the new script failed to push the kernel. I'll keep everyone posted with updates
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
I've been working with joeykrim getting his app setup for our device, it looks like it should work, hopefully, within the next couple of days we can get this working and released
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
I've been working with joeykrim getting his app setup for our device, it looks like it should work, hopefully, within the next couple of days we can get this working and released
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be wonderful!
I'm tired of having to repeat myself.
flash_image boot /sdcard/boot.img
flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery.img
Binary100100 said:
That would be wonderful!
I'm tired of having to repeat myself.
flash_image boot /sdcard/boot.img
flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just wish the devs would use your script, it would make things so much easier
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
I just wish the devs would use your script, it would make things so much easier
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once I see that they do I can work out something else like:
kernelupdate
recoveryupdate
kernelupdate would be
flash_image boot /sdcard/kernel/*boot*.img
recoveryupdate would be
flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery/*recovery*.img
So that if you place ANY of the appropriate img file in the perspective folders on the sdcard partition it would flash the .img by just entering either of the two commands from adb shell or terminal.
But I'm not going to waste my time if the devs don't want to use it.
Binary100100 said:
Once I see that they do I can work out something else like:
kernelupdate
recoveryupdate
kernelupdate would be
flash_image boot /sdcard/kernel/*boot*.img
recoveryupdate would be
flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery/*recovery*.img
So that if you place ANY of the appropriate img file in the perspective folders on the sdcard partition it would flash the .img by just entering either of the two commands from adb shell or terminal.
But I'm not going to waste my time if the devs don't want to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could a script be written to automatically flash these while installing/flashing the custom rom? This would cut down atleast the step for flashing kernels for a lot of noobs!!
seansk said:
could a script be written to automatically flash these while installing/flashing the custom rom? This would cut down atleast the step for flashing kernels for a lot of noobs!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, yes! I did add it to the init.d script but since xboarder had removed the init.d scripts from his rom it doesn't work anymore. But you sure could. It was basically how I was setting up my CWMFaux kernels. However it didn't seem to work 100% of the time. Couldn't figure out why.
It basically worked like this...
Flashing the CWM custom kernel .zip via recovery.
copies boot.img to /system
copies init.d 06tweaks script to init.d folder.
copies and set permissions for flash_image binary and kernelupdate script to /system/bin directory.
You then boot your phone up which triggers the init.d script which commands the kernelupdate script to initiate. The kernel update script is simply using the flash_image binary command "flash_image boot /system/boot.img" and it automatically updates the kernel. Then the init.d script removes the boot.img file from the /system directory to keep it from flashing upon every boot.
I would like to change it to /sdcard directory but there's the problem that the sdcard doesn't get mounted until the very end. WAY after the system. Which is why I stored it there. The system gets mounted even before the data partition so I couldn't even store the file in data because the script would run even before the data partition could mount. Basically the script is initiated while your still looking at the boot animation. Pretty much when your softkey backlights and led light comes on it flashes the new kernel. It's a pretty neat workaround if I must say but unfortunately nowhere near perfect and not even close to having an s-off workaround.
Now if you don't mind the fact that it won't be initiated upon boot I could make it so that it will flash any file in a perspective folder on the sdcard.
example:
kernelupdate would update the kernel with any *boot*.img file located in a certain directory... say /sdcard/kernel
recoveryupdate would update the recovery with any *recovery*.img file located in a certain directory... say /sdcard/recovery
The problem:
Some people would want to collect their kernels and recoveries and store them in those directories. That would NOT be possible since using the command "flash_image recovery /sdcard/*recovery*.img would flash any img file with the word "recovery" in it. So if there's more than one it would error out and not flash anything because of the conflict. Same principal with the kernel only MOST kernels are simply named "boot.img" where-as almost all recovery files have a unique name since they are all already custom.
Binary100100 said:
Actually, yes! I did add it to the init.d script but since xboarder had removed the init.d scripts from his rom it doesn't work anymore. But you sure could. It was basically how I was setting up my CWMFaux kernels. However it didn't seem to work 100% of the time. Couldn't figure out why.
It basically worked like this...
Flashing the CWM custom kernel .zip via recovery.
copies boot.img to /system
copies init.d 06tweaks script to init.d folder.
copies and set permissions for flash_image binary and kernelupdate script to /system/bin directory.
You then boot your phone up which triggers the init.d script which commands the kernelupdate script to initiate. The kernel update script is simply using the flash_image binary command "flash_image boot /system/boot.img" and it automatically updates the kernel. Then the init.d script removes the boot.img file from the /system directory to keep it from flashing upon every boot.
I would like to change it to /sdcard directory but there's the problem that the sdcard doesn't get mounted until the very end. WAY after the system. Which is why I stored it there. The system gets mounted even before the data partition so I couldn't even store the file in data because the script would run even before the data partition could mount. Basically the script is initiated while your still looking at the boot animation. Pretty much when your softkey backlights and led light comes on it flashes the new kernel. It's a pretty neat workaround if I must say but unfortunately nowhere near perfect and not even close to having an s-off workaround.
Now if you don't mind the fact that it won't be initiated upon boot I could make it so that it will flash any file in a perspective folder on the sdcard.
example:
kernelupdate would update the kernel with any *boot*.img file located in a certain directory... say /sdcard/kernel
recoveryupdate would update the recovery with any *recovery*.img file located in a certain directory... say /sdcard/recovery
The problem:
Some people would want to collect their kernels and recoveries and store them in those directories. That would NOT be possible since using the command "flash_image recovery /sdcard/*recovery*.img would flash any img file with the word "recovery" in it. So if there's more than one it would error out and not flash anything because of the conflict. Same principal with the kernel only MOST kernels are simply named "boot.img" where-as almost all recovery files have a unique name since they are all already custom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quite a dilemma, I wonder if we could add pause to the script until everything is loaded on the first boot then after the pause the script flahes the recovery and more importantly the kernel!!! if this was possible we could keep the files in a separate place on the SD card.
Still nothing like S-off!!! Thanks HTC for being so dev friendly
seansk said:
quite a dilemma, I wonder if we could add pause to the script until everything is loaded on the first boot then after the pause the script flahes the recovery and more importantly the kernel!!! if this was possible we could keep the files in a separate place on the SD card.
Still nothing like S-off!!! Thanks HTC for being so dev friendly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure there's a way to add a delay timer of some sort. I'm just not that savvy. Easiest way would be through an app like Tasker.
DEFINITIONOFREAL said:
Would this be a possible solution to our kernel flashing problems, I know it works for the evo
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The short answer is yes!
I've setup the application to support the HTC Amaze 4G, but before I release it publically and officially, I want to have a few testers confirm everything is working properly for them.
Posted all the information in a new thread as this one seems to be covering a few different topics so I didn't want to "hijack".
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=21574722
Thanks for the request and for reaching out to me DEFINITIONOFREAL.
Binary100100 said:
Once I see that they do I can work out something else like:
kernelupdate
recoveryupdate
kernelupdate would be
flash_image boot /sdcard/kernel/*boot*.img
recoveryupdate would be
flash_image recovery /sdcard/recovery/*recovery*.img
So that if you place ANY of the appropriate img file in the perspective folders on the sdcard partition it would flash the .img by just entering either of the two commands from adb shell or terminal.
But I'm not going to waste my time if the devs don't want to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think my application, Flash Image GUI, will be the best alternative, but of course I have a biased opinion!
Regarding alternatives, I think a simple sh script which takes an argument would make a nice wrapper. The argument would be location to the image file to flash. The script could either bundle the flash_image binary or take the location of it as another argument.
All depends on how the developers want to create some type of standard. Which is another great reason Flash Image GUI will work well as it contains everything required and doesn't rely on developers providing support in their ROM, only relys on developers following the standards for ROMs and kernel .zip files.
Also, in looking through some of the custom ROMs and kernel .zip files for this device, I notice one of the custom kernels does something similar to the suggestions above, it executes a file located in /system/etc/init.d on every boot which automatically flashes /system/boot.img file.
At first glance I was horrified to see this as this is a *major* security issue. If anybody were to place any type of file in /system/boot.img, either a rogue kernel or just a blank file, the script automatically flashed it on boot w/o any type of file verification or user notification!
Wanted to get that off my chest and discourage the use of *automatic* loading of any type of major file, such as kernel or recovery image, especially without at least file verification or user approval/notification.
I'll try and keep up with the thread and help contribute ideas to alternatives for anybody who wants to develop/implement! Great ideas in the thread and always enjoy reading community collaboration efforts, especially in resolution to manufacturer "adjustments" of standards.
ugh, sorry about the double post (too excited for being too early in the morning). if a moderator wants to combine my last two posts, please do. i dont have access to delete a post.
joeykrim said:
I think my application, Flash Image GUI, will be the best alternative, but of course I have a biased opinion!
Regarding alternatives, I think a simple sh script which takes an argument would make a nice wrapper. The argument would be location to the image file to flash. The script could either bundle the flash_image binary or take the location of it as another argument.
All depends on how the developers want to create some type of standard. Which is another great reason Flash Image GUI will work well as it contains everything required and doesn't rely on developers providing support in their ROM, only relys on developers following the standards for ROMs and kernel .zip files.
Also, in looking through some of the custom ROMs and kernel .zip files for this device, I notice one of the custom kernels does something similar to the suggestions above, it executes a file located in /system/etc/init.d on every boot which automatically flashes /system/boot.img file.
At first glance I was horrified to see this as this is a *major* security issue. If anybody were to place any type of file in /system/boot.img, either a rogue kernel or just a blank file, the script automatically flashed it on boot w/o any type of file verification or user notification!
Wanted to get that off my chest and discourage the use of *automatic* loading of any type of major file, such as kernel or recovery image, especially without at least file verification or user approval/notification.
I'll try and keep up with the thread and help contribute ideas to alternatives for anybody who wants to develop/implement! Great ideas in the thread and always enjoy reading community collaboration efforts, especially in resolution to manufacturer "adjustments" of standards.
ugh, sorry about the double post (too excited for being too early in the morning). if a moderator wants to combine my last two posts, please do. i dont have access to delete a post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I look forward to tryin out your app.
It was basically what this thread was all about in the first place.
The clockwork method that you mentioned is the only workaround that I was able to come up with for custom kernels (like Faux123) because a kernel cannot be flashed through recovery without s-off. Really stupid. So I started thinking "How can we flash a boot.img file from recovery without the typical means?" Then came up with the solution to flash_image the boot.img file automatically IF the file is detected. But how to start a script automatically upon boot? init.d is the only way I could think of. Okay... so where to put the boot? I tried the sdcard but it failed to mount until it was way too late. So... data. Nope... still didn't mount in time. Cache? Well... how many developers will include a cache file into their roms? So the only other option was /system and it seemed convenient since /system mounts BEFORE the script can run (obviously) so that's why it is as it is. I also figured "If someone wants to flash a new kernel all they need to do is push the boot.img to /system and reboot." Must easier than using the EKF method (requiring PC access) and I don't know about you but I'm not around a computer 24/7.