As we all know, official Android upgrades for the Nokia 6.1 Plus have ended with the Android 10 update and we will only be getting security patches going forth. However, some of us have the drive and desire to try out newer releases of Android, but we can't exactly shell out more money for a new device that will receive those updates.
Some of you might be aware that to make Android 11 (and beyond) ROMs a reality, any device needs a Device Tree and a Vendor Tree, and currently, there are no full trees for our device.
That's where I come in - again some of you might already be aware, but I have been working on full device and vendor trees for this device, with proper commit histories (flashbacks) so as to maintain order in the community. The trees are WIP, but the progress can be followed in the links below.
Device Tree
Vendor Tree
My current roadmap is as follows (I will update this list as and when I finish those things)
1. Finish the Device Tree by adding "configs," "rootdir," "ramdisk," and "symlinks"
2. Work on the Vendor Tree and pull missing blobs from the device
3. Build and test LineageOS with my trees - 31st build tested, device boots, sensors RIP
4. Maybe build other ROMs till android 11 arrives
Hoping to extend the life of this device,
Sid
Stonks
He attac,
He protec,
But most importantly
He got our bac
cocacola pepsi,
sid bhaiya sexy!
Cheers bro, I'm all for this!
Bumping the thread since I'm halfway done.
Also noticed another dev is close to releasing "source built vendor."
Dear dev, I challenge you to make your trees public.
Sid127 said:
Bumping the thread since I'm halfway done.
Also noticed another dev is close to releasing "source built vendor."
Dear dev, I challenge you to make your trees public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do it I am with you Coca Cola Pepsy developer :silly:
Moderator Information
Hello OP, I have moved this thread from Development to General as there is no ROM available yet. Please report this thread or contact me again if you have a ROM and kernel source links available, I can move this into Development section then.
Thanks.
Regarding the recent sparks of controversy and mods being involved and a certain someone posting this on their public channel -
Forgot to say few kids started doing criticism again better my answer do by your own or learn from scratch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only one response to the
message - I HAVE done it by myself and I HAVE learned from scratch, and my trees (which can be viewed by anyone) are evidence of the same. My GitHub history can be followed to see exactly HOW I learned too - my modifying Motorola (Chef) trees.
Also, one question for everyone - considering we had vendorless builds for our device since Android Pie, am I the only one who finds it suspicious that said dev built vendor sources only around the same time I did? I just would like to take a look at said Dev's work and verify.
Cheers,
Sid
Bumping thread since I finally made progress
After 31 excruciating builds, I'm abandoning my trees. My vendor repo got taken down in a DMCA notice for a proprietary library, and I just don't have the motivation to continue on my Device Tree after being seemingly stuck on a device which boots but nothing works. My tree is still gonna be up on my GitHub for anyone to refer to. As for ROMs, the Official LOS trees work great and that's what I'll be using for builds. Though I didn't finish what I started, I learned a lot and am thankful for the journey.
Cheers,
Sid
Edit: vendor repo is up again and I have removed the disputed lib
I wish you had maintained it as you've already done most of the work. What is the end node of device trees which marks its completion?
Volski_ said:
I wish you had maintained it as you've already done most of the work. What is the end node of device trees which marks its completion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try and maintain it, but they've been abandoned for the time being... with Android R on the horizon, it didn't make much sense to spend countless hours trying to fix Android 10 trees. Device trees can be called complete when ROMs built using them are stable enough for daily use with every function working as intended.
Related
NEED HELP
Hello guys, I'm working on a generic tree for our beloved device Honor 7, but not getting enough success, so each and every of you are invited to help me create a new device tree for AOSP 5.1 ROM or CM 12.1, so that we can taste the Stock Android too.
The benefits of these ROMs are that the device will get more fast and stable as there will be minimum apps and bloatwares installed.
So, it is a humble request, that whosoever have any knowledge about creating a tree from scratch please help me.
I have created a skeleton of the tree but it is not a success too as there are many things we still have to consider.
@sminki and @kenshiwara, we will setup an organization on GitHub so everyone can contribute there only.
Hi,
It will be wonderfull to have CM on our honor7.
Sorry mate. You haven't seen my troubles over the last few weeks then
After my H7 'died', I got a warranty replacement phone, and unlocking was proving impossible, each day was bringing more frustration and anger so i've sold it!
That's it, i'm out of the "honor" business for good (hence the "unsupported" bit on the recovery and kernel threads), but as a parting "gift", here's a few things that may help "the cause".
Sorry, the length of this post got out of control! :silly:
device tree starting point:
https://github.com/TeamWin/android_device_huawei_p8 - it's similar enough, that with a little editing and boom, we had our recovery*
https://github.com/debbiche/android_device_huawei_p8 - another fuller "tree" (wip), again the p8 is similar enough to use as a base
https://github.com/Gibbon99/android_device_huawei_hwgemini - mediapad x2 - another kirin
if you're insane, you could get the dtb files (iirc - i got these from compiling the source) and decompile, but this contains EVERYTHING, theses files are huge, many hundred kb and would take days to get the info out you need (if there is any!)
cm
have a look at codeworkx H6 git, it's the closest device you'll find that has CM actually running on it, albeit CM11 (and abandoned!)
https://github.com/codeworkx/proprietary_vendor_huawei
https://github.com/codeworkx/android_device_huawei_h60-common
other things:
osm0sis' kitchen out of the many boot image unpack/repack tools, this worked the best with huawei boot/recovery images
* with this in mind, anyone running Linux can pull apart my recovery, fix the issues in default.prop, add extra partitions to fstab and repack it. then post it for everyone else to use.
with the sh!tty way fastboot is on these phones, and the way modem binaries get patched, you're going to have to look for a way to write these in recovery (scripted with dd i imagine) so that everyone can use without having the ballache that is B100,B121,B140 etc etc to get to a version that will work with your ROM. this for me is where it's all going to hurt! (and end with bricks!)
final thing - the kernel source is terrible, it is so far removed from AOSP that simple things that you could normally just drop in, like cpu governors won't work. unless you really know C++ and how to debug it's gonna be near stock (like mine funnily enough!)
Good luck chaps :good: it's gonna be a hell of a ride!
sminki said:
Sorry mate. You haven't seen my troubles over the last few weeks then
After my H7 'died', I got a warranty replacement phone, and unlocking was proving impossible, each day was bringing more frustration and anger so i've sold it!
That's it, i'm out of the "honor" business for good (hence the "unsupported" bit on the recovery and kernel threads), but as a parting "gift", here's a few things that may help "the cause".
Sorry, the length of this post got out of control! :silly:
device tree starting point:
https://github.com/TeamWin/android_device_huawei_p8 - it's similar enough, that with a little editing and boom, we had our recovery*
https://github.com/debbiche/android_device_huawei_p8 - another fuller "tree" (wip), again the p8 is similar enough to use as a base
https://github.com/Gibbon99/android_device_huawei_hwgemini - mediapad x2 - another kirin
if you're insane, you could get the dtb files (iirc - i got these from compiling the source) and decompile, but this contains EVERYTHING, theses files are huge, many hundred kb and would take days to get the info out you need (if there is any!)
cm
have a look at codeworkx H6 git, it's the closest device you'll find that has CM actually running on it, albeit CM11 (and abandoned!)
https://github.com/codeworkx/proprietary_vendor_huawei
https://github.com/codeworkx/android_device_huawei_h60-common
other things:
osm0sis' kitchen out of the many boot image unpack/repack tools, this worked the best with huawei boot/recovery images
* with this in mind, anyone running Linux can pull apart my recovery, fix the issues in default.prop, add extra partitions to fstab and repack it. then post it for everyone else to use.
with the sh!tty way fastboot is on these phones, and the way modem binaries get patched, you're going to have to look for a way to write these in recovery (scripted with dd i imagine) so that everyone can use without having the ballache that is B100,B121,B140 etc etc to get to a version that will work with your ROM. this for me is where it's all going to hurt! (and end with bricks!)
final thing - the kernel source is terrible, it is so far removed from AOSP that simple things that you could normally just drop in, like cpu governors won't work. unless you really know C++ and how to debug it's gonna be near stock (like mine funnily enough!)
Good luck chaps :good: it's gonna be a hell of a ride!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, this will help enough and I was not aware of your troubles
I got a device tree working with CM12.1 and USB debugging, but Mali was a showstopper. Now I'm fighting with CM13 instead... Generally, the B313 ROM is far less hacky, but we lose the open source kernel for a while until they release one.
I will set up a GitHub tree with what I have when I get CM13 compiling again, however keep in mind that you need to patch the boot.img manually to use the closed-source B313 kernel until Huawei releases the source for that, which probably won't happen at the very least until it's fully in OTA. I'd love some help from someone who is more experienced, especially with the Mali drivers which are the worst of pains.
EDIT: I got CM13 compiling again. Let's hope for the best.
EDIT2: Mali works! Sadly, that currently depends on Huawei's libgui.so which brings in a huge chunk of Huawei's patched libraries - otherwise, it segfaults in strange places. Any ideas?
Is there any whatsapp group of honor 7.I want to join it.
udayraj99 said:
Is there any whatsapp group of honor 7.I want to join it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop spamming
Omg I think I will never receive a Custom ROM for PLK-UL00 as they didn't release source code for that and device tree is way far
Mee too
omkarpranavxxx said:
Omg I think I will never receive a Custom ROM for PLK-UL00 as they didn't release source code for that and device tree is way far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As an indian user evwn i feel i made wrong choice....should have gone for one plus x
asiekierka said:
I got a device tree working with CM12.1 and USB debugging, but Mali was a showstopper. Now I'm fighting with CM13 instead... Generally, the B313 ROM is far less hacky, but we lose the open source kernel for a while until they release one.
I will set up a GitHub tree with what I have when I get CM13 compiling again, however keep in mind that you need to patch the boot.img manually to use the closed-source B313 kernel until Huawei releases the source for that, which probably won't happen at the very least until it's fully in OTA. I'd love some help from someone who is more experienced, especially with the Mali drivers which are the worst of pains.
EDIT: I got CM13 compiling again. Let's hope for the best.
EDIT2: Mali works! Sadly, that currently depends on Huawei's libgui.so which brings in a huge chunk of Huawei's patched libraries - otherwise, it segfaults in strange places. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, did any of the CM compiled fully to be a flashable zip? if yes, then have you flashed it and took logcat?
Nishadan said:
As an indian user evwn i feel i made wrong choice....should have gone for one plus x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup lesson learnt snapdragon or nothing frm now on
maybe you know
I post link - http://download-c.huawei.com/downlo...oadId=62086&version=204465&siteCode=worldwide
Honor 7 Open Source（PLK-L01_Android5_0_2_EMUI3_1_kernel_EN)
Any progress?
I hope I can do something,it is nice to see cm for honor 7.
Since it has been a while that any Info came out of this thread I have to ask.. Is anyone still working the tree?
I normaly do not ask for etas but in this case it would be useful if the thread is abandoned that we could know the reasons and Problems so maybe someone else could join in with a different approach
cycovision said:
Since it has been a while that any Info came out of this thread I have to ask.. Is anyone still working the tree?
I normaly do not ask for etas but in this case it would be useful if the thread is abandoned that we could know the reasons and Problems so maybe someone else could join in with a different approach
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a bit busy to continue my work on the tree, but after my exams I will continue to work on tree with Android 6.0 source. Hope it goes well.
DigiGoon said:
I'm a bit busy to continue my work on the tree, but after my exams I will continue to work on tree with Android 6.0 source. Hope it goes well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck with your exams
Until then you can use this
New ROM for Honor 7 PLK-L01.
DigiGoon said:
Until then you can use this
New ROM for Honor 7 PLK-L01.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can we get a kitkat rom if your work with the device tree is done ? I really do miss kitkat[emoji20]
Sent from my PLK-TL01H using XDA-Developers mobile app
muhammad Shohayeb said:
Can we get a kitkat rom if your work with the device tree is done ? I really do miss kitkat[emoji20]
Sent from my PLK-TL01H using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will be developing AOSP 6.0, if others can give it a try then maybe we can get it.
Hi all,
Now that CM is dead (RIP) and official Lineage OS for the Wileyfox Swift 2 has not yet happened, i've been looking into other alternative OS's that are compatible with the Wileyfox Swift 2 [marmite].
However i'm not seeing any that are compatible for this device (Resurrection Remix, Dirty Unicorn, LineageOS (yet) and wondered if anyone has had any experience with any other custom OS's that they know are compatible?
Thanks
There are none because there is no source code for this device. You must be patient and wait until Wileyfox releases (Before the end of this month?!) the promised Android 7.1 update, and hope they also release the source code with it.
I did several modifications to stock CyanogenOS 13.1 version for myself, but I found not worth it sharing that, since we're going to receive the new update really really soon. If the update is a disaster, or they do a OnePlus (release the update on the 31st, late in the night before the end of the month, and full of bugs), I'll consider sharing it. But until then, just wait for it.
Thanks for the update. :good::good:
linuxct said:
since we're going to receive the new update really really soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in hope. :fingers-crossed:
linuxct said:
There are none because there is no source code for this device. You must be patient and wait until Wileyfox releases (Before the end of this month?!) the promised Android 7.1 update, and hope they also release the source code with it.
I did several modifications to stock CyanogenOS 13.1 version for myself, but I found not worth it sharing that, since we're going to receive the new update really really soon. If the update is a disaster, or they do a OnePlus (release the update on the 31st, late in the night before the end of the month, and full of bugs), I'll consider sharing it. But until then, just wait for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats not true there is maybe not a source code but the chips inside the device (and drivers) are also used in other devices wich are so you can make roms for this device.
There are no roms because this phone isn't used by many peaple yet or the community isnt big at the moment for this device but we can port roms from the xiaomi redmi 3s for instance
draakwars said:
Thats not true there is maybe not a source code but the chips inside the device (and drivers) are also used in other devices wich are so you can make roms for this device.
There are no roms because this phone isn't used by many peaple yet or the community isnt big at the moment for this device but we can port roms from the xiaomi redmi 3s for instance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF? Do you think that by having same CPU means we should have the very same source code? I know there's source code for the SD430 in codeaurora, and that Xiaomi released sources for land, but that doesn't mean anything. It'd require a lot of dirty and unnecessary stuff to get it working here (it's not only about the CPU, right?), and since Wileyfox is REQUIRED to release the source code (all OEMs are) we can avoid it by just waiting patiently. From there, building Lineage will be easier, but hey, if anyone wants to do the hard job, use land-m source code and try to port it, is free to do so! :laugh:
linuxct said:
Wileyfox is REQUIRED to release the source code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Manufacturers need to release kernel source as it's under a GPL license, but Android itself is under the Apache License 2.0 and manufacturers are not required to release any source code. In fact the vast majority of manufacturers do not release any of their internal Android code.
And having kernel source does not magically allow you to make custom ROMs. In fact you shouldn't even need the manufacturers kernel source unless they are using some obscure hardware.
flibblesan said:
Manufacturers need to release kernel source as it's under a GPL license, but Android itself is under the Apache License 2.0 and manufacturers are not required to release any source code. In fact the vast majority of manufacturers do not release any of their internal Android code.
And having kernel source does not magically allow you to make custom ROMs. In fact you shouldn't even need the manufacturers kernel source unless they are using some obscure hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it's better having and working with it, isn't it? I know we will need to bring up a device tree, and that it's not that easy, but starting out of a good base is better than mixing sources from other phones, at least that's my opinion.
The kernel sources are already available for a long time (slowpokes?): https://bitbucket.org/wileyfox/kernel-wileyfox-msm8937
BeYkeRYkt said:
The kernel sources are already available for a long time (slowpokes?): https://bitbucket.org/wileyfox/kernel-wileyfox-msm8937
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops. You made my day man. I swear I wasn't able to find that, I had no idea they published it already, they didn't mention it on social media, and whenever I asked them on the support chat they were like "Sorry, we don't have that".
linuxct said:
Oops. You made my day man. I swear I wasn't able to find that, I had no idea they published it already, they didn't mention it on social media, and whenever I asked them on the support chat they were like "Sorry, we don't have that".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because I do not think that the public (where most users are not geeks, probably) will be interested in the post that the developers have released the source code of the kernel. Or someone beforehand, before closing Cyanogen Inc, released the source code for the kernel. And support is usually not answered to such questions, because they do not have such information.
But in any case you need the information you need to find in all available ways.
I have the idea for an unified build from quite some time, but only now I'm trying to bring it to life.
Looking at LineageOS github and gerrit you can see that other devices (klte, m8) have the same stupid amount of variants, but they have merged them into one device repo.. So why can't this happen for the Note4?
Following their steps I've created an unified android_device_samsung_trlte (that includes SM-N910F/trltexx, SM-N910G/trltedt, SM-N910T/trltetmo, SM-N910W8/trltecan, SM-N910P/trltespr, SM-N910R4/trlteusc and SM-N910V/trltevzw), this proprietary_vendor_samsung and added this commit to the android_device_samsung_trlte-common that I'm currently using.
For now I'm able to use those repos to build a LineageOS-14.1 build that boots up, but w/o sim and camera being recognized.. For what I've tested (on trltexx) wifi and (strangely) bluetooth are working. Something is probably wrong with specific device blobs not being recognized/used properly.
It needs some work but I think this is a good base to start with.
trltexx/trltedt blobs are from here;
trltetmo/trltecan blobs are from here;
trltespr/trlteusc blobs are from here;
trltevzw is using trltespr blobs for now (there are no guaranteed working blobs repos for it at the moment, the only (WIP) way is to establish which are needed and extract them from hsbadr's builds).
The kernel is the same that I'm using for the not unified builds (android_kernel_samsung_trlte), at the moment testing if the klte's way of using the international variant defconfig works for us too.. other options are to add something like this commit to remove the need of a variant defconfig or merge the different defconfigs into one and use that instead.
Source:
unified_android_device_samsung_trlte
unified_android_device_samsung_trlte-common
unified_proprietary_vendor_samsung
android_kernel_samsung_trlte
I was going to share this anyway, but I'm sharing it now (even if there are still major problems) because I have a very limited free time where I can work on it, so, maybe, someone of you will join/fork/clone this project and help me out, finalizing it earlier and better (the support of experienced developers is needed and much appreciated).
I'm now going to mention the SeniorMembers/RecognizedContributors/RecognizedDevelopers that, maybe, have interest in this project.
@fattire @hsbadr @SaintZ93 @SferaDev @TheBr0ken @ZION959
If you get it to work, @_mone, I'll switch my daily builds to this unified one.
On a related matter, there seems to be a typo in the name of one of your repos: unified_andorid_device_samsung_trlte.
Let me also add @lilferraro to the list of devs, as I use his device tree to build for trltespr.
I built this and it boots, with the same issues you have (no SIM detected, camera is busted). Took a bunch of of logs. Getprop shows ro.build.fingerprint is trltetmo (which is right), ro.bootimage.build.fingerprint is trlte. Wifi and bluetooth are working. Mediaserver/libcameraservice service crashes repeatedly. I agree with you that having a unified tree for the entire Note 4 line is the way to go. I tried manually copying the blobs from /system/blobs/tmo/ to /system/lib and /system/vendor/lib but it didn't help.
what proprietary blobs did you use for sprint?
All device trees for the note 4 pie builds are up at
GitHub.com/tripLr-dev
User forum at Telegram
https://t.me/triplr_dev_users
Thanks to @_mone
And @ripee
I will do a test build of my Ubuntu Touch port using this unified repo and report back if anyone is interested. My port still needs a couple things to work but the stuff that works now should be enough to give me a good idea if it will work or not.
tigerpro357 said:
I will do a test build of my Ubuntu Touch port using this unified repo and report back if anyone is interested. My port still needs a couple things to work but the stuff that works now should be enough to give me a good idea if it will work or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let us know what you need
Source code
GitHub.com/triplr-dev
Contact me on telegram t.me/telegram to get you in touch with testers and developers. .
I am EXTREMELY interested in a touch port.
Thanks
Also GitHub.com/underscoremone for all the older stuff
I actually have my work on github already, I am also on telegram in the ubports groups, and if you would like to help my repo is probably the best place to start (unless you prefer duplicating work) I only have sensors and the stylus left for hardware (both of which I have been trying to get working) the stylus is an issue on the ubports side but I dont understand the code enough for mir. I haven't had a chance to test the unified repo yet, but I will once I have a few minutes to actually do it.
I wonder how it work to create xda threads for Ubuntu touch, since they seem to have their own forums.
I think adding Ubuntu touch to xda would be an additional resource for users and developers.
tripLr said:
I wonder how it work to create xda threads for Ubuntu touch, since they seem to have their own forums.
I think adding Ubuntu touch to xda would be an additional resource for users and developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, as all I really see on xda as far as Ubuntu Touch goes is prebuilt downloads which is good for letting people try it, but when I started I initially looked into xda but found no help. I do hope to see that change in the future though
Nice to see someone actually wanting to still develop for this device.. I love this Note4 still.
doubledragon5 said:
Nice to see someone actually wanting to still develop for this device.. I love this Note4 still.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here
We have several developers for note 4 snapdragon and exynos
T.me/triplr_dev_users
See you there
Roms
Tiny.cc/triplr
Tiny.cc/ripee
And many links in XDA for ROM threads
Post comments in XDA, and bug reports and logs in telegram
Android 10 in progress
Thanks @_mone
The lineage-17.1 thread is up!
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL][10] LineageOS 17.1 [tblte][trlte][trlteduos]
If you don't mind not having a working fingerprint sensor, or audio through the headphone jack, then Q is stable enough for daily use. As always when coming from an older rom version, it is highly recommended not to waste your time dirty flashing and just clean flash.
Q is still a work in progress, so I will still be releasing Pie builds, though maybe not as often. As in years past, once the Q bugs have been fixed up to the current Pie level, I will post about when my last Pie build will be. I will upload it to the Downloads tab located at the top of each page of this thread, and link it in the OP.
All the blah blah about "as is", you being responsible for what you choose to do and do to your device, no guarantees implied nor stated... And all the usual to install. I wont be paying much attention to bugs, however, PLEASE post them as you find them to let others know what they can expect.
This build is a ONE-OFF and you should look at the original thread by @Krizthian for possible future builds. https://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-crdroid-v4-0-google-nexus-5-t3767591
Special thanks to @haze_nme who provided the device and kernel for without which this build would not be possible. Please visit his post and give the thanks button a BIG slap! https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=76807742&postcount=315
Of course, thanks to the crDroid team for providing the ROM source itself; and making it so easy to build using LineageOS device trees.:good:
Changes from the default source:
Code:
[FONT="Verdana"] Added the MiXplorer [url]https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1523691[/url]
I got the OK first too include in my unofficial ROMs that I build, visit the forum, they are very helpful for this VERY powerful file explorer. [url]https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1523691[/url]
You can thank @HootanParsa for building it, and letting me include it:good: Be sure to share some thanks.
Switched over to the ResurrectionRemox launcher. I had issues with the default launcher in crDroid. Also on another device, and I think I have read some other users had the same on even more devices.
Vinyl Music Player and removed crDroid music.
It has more features but is based off the same original app in crDroid. Including a dark theme!
Just to be polite I checked with the dev to get his ok, even though its open source. It can also be fund on F-Droid
OmniClock replaces the standard deskclock. Sourced from OmniROM, so a big thanks to them. It has a nicer dark skinn also.
[/FONT]
I have only done a rudimentary test on it. I flashed PICO Gapps, and there aint much room left in the system partition.
Source: https://github.com/crdroidandroid
Device: https://github.com/hazenme/android_device_lge_hammerhead
Kernel: https://github.com/hazenme/android_kernel_lge_hammerhead
Vendor: https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_lge
You can download this build, and flash at your own risk, from:
crDroidAndroid-8.1-20180614-hammerhead-v4.4-DiamondJohnDroid.zip
MD5: 25e05c3f02d34968f308ac6b4ad32b8b
Thanks a bunch, I am eager to test this out and will update once I get a chance.
Good news, love crdroid rom, downloading. , thanks
Thank you so much for taking this project, I'm waiting for updates
Greetings
Krizthian said:
Thank you so much for taking this project, I'm waiting for updates
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldnt be too grateful, it was a one-off build of a secondary/spare device I have. While I await updates to my daily devices' kernel and device tree
DiamondJohn said:
This build is a ONE-OFF and you should look at the original thread by @Krizthian for possible future builds. https://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-crdroid-v4-0-google-nexus-5-t3767591
...snip....
Special thanks to @haze_nme who provided the device and kernel for without which this build would not be possible. Please visit his post and give the thanks button a BIG slap! https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=76807742&postcount=315
...snip....
Source: https://github.com/crdroidandroid
Device: https://github.com/hazenme/android_device_lge_hammerhead
Kernel: https://github.com/hazenme/android_kernel_lge_hammerhead
Vendor: https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_lge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I too should be looking at the commits made into @Hazenmetrees to possibly see what needs to be done against my actual device.
DiamondJohn said:
I wouldnt be too grateful, it was a one-off build of a secondary/spare device I have. While I await updates to my daily devices' kernel and device tree
Maybe I too should be looking at the commits made into @Hazenmetrees to possibly see what needs to be done against my actual device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oreo for RAZR M perhaps?
That'd be quite the display if you could get that to work, assuming that is still your daily device. I have an N5 spare as well, but the WiFi chip broke : (
4.4 is working like a champ here. Many thanks. Tried to install ElementalX 9.02 but it wouldn't take. Will investigate further soon.
Galaxyninja66 said:
Oreo for RAZR M perhaps?
That'd be quite the display if you could get that to work, assuming that is still your daily device. I have an N5 spare as well, but the WiFi chip broke : (
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cast your mind back. My Razr is dead! Upgrading the kernel (and the device tree) is a big task. We were very lucky for Nougat, as the XT897 was pretty damn close and it had an official LOS build. ie the device tree and kernel were basically ready to kang. As far as I know, there is no official Oreo for the xt897 and therefore, unless you spend the time and effort, there is no Oreo for the xt907/xt905/xt926 etc etc.
For now I use and build for an GT-i9506 as my daily, and I also have an N5 as a "spare", which is half dead (mic is flakey which makes a phonee useless). I build for the N5 as "practice" for the S4, and I shared the results here, as I saw the current builds were quite old; [sarcasm]and I'm such a nice guy[/sarcasm]
DiamondJohn said:
Cast your mind back. My Razr is dead! Upgrading the kernel (and the device tree) is a big task. We were very lucky for Nougat, as the XT897 was pretty damn close and it had an official LOS build. ie the device tree and kernel were basically ready to kang. As far as I know, there is no official Oreo for the xt897 and therefore, unless you spend the time and effort, there is no Oreo for the xt907/xt905/xt926 etc etc.
For now I use and build for an GT-i9506 as my daily, and I also have an N5 as a "spare", which is half dead (mic is flakey which makes a phonee useless). I build for the N5 as "practice" for the S4, and I shared the results here, as I saw the current builds were quite old; [sarcasm]and I'm such a nice guy[/sarcasm]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... messed up Nexus 5 you say... maybe we can trade mother boards via mail?
eh who am I kidding my Nexus 5 is worthless to me, the modem still works making it's purpose as a backup phone fulfilled
Thank you so much!!!!!!
@DiamondJohn : thanks man
4.5 will be?
see post https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=77301143&postcount=50
OP request.
THREAD CLOSED
This is unofficial lineageos 16 for Motorola Clark. It is only compatible with nougat firmware - you must have the nougat bootloader and modem flashed on your device.
Tons of thanks to hashbang for all of his work
Kernel Source-
https://github.com/randomblame/android_kernel_motorola_msm8992
Device tree-
https://github.com/randomblame/android_device_motorola_clark
Current status of rom-
Daily Driver
Broken-
Camera post processing- rotation is not accounted for in hal with latest round of hacks credit to AgathosAnthropos for fixing image capture by disabling the calls to pp, hold device in landscape for photos
Tethering - it works but device will soft reboot when tethering stops
Dual sim variants are NOT supported! I do not have the hardware to test and fix at this time - bugreports appreciated
Working - everything else?
Try it yourself (Requires Nougat Firmware and as always wipe data+cache)
Latest Releases:
1/12/2020 https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=4349826312261700035
8/1/2019 https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=6006931924117928331
Don't forget to grab a compatible version of gapps for 9.0
https://opengapps.org
Once again this rom REQUIRES that the stock nougat firmware was properly flashed to work correctly... It will check before installation that you have the correct modem version installed.
*If your radio does not work you may have the wrong modem
*If you can not switch lockscreen to pin or pattern you may have the wrong modem.
*Modem flashes fail quietly sometimes please make sure you have properly flashed it before reporting issues.
Great! [emoji6]
Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X mediante Tapatalk
I'll be happy to test once there is a working rom
I've been updating op, it seems to just be getting shorter as I fix things. The rom now compiles with default manifest only needs device tree and kernel source now. something is failing quietly and preventing boot. I'm just working the problem slowly getting it sorted out.
Can't wait to see more from this
We wait impatiently.
Spent a couple more hours going through init narrowing it down failure happens just before zygote startsI currently have my pure propped up in charging position so I can work more on it it's had a hard life
Thank You so much
randomblame said:
I've been updating op, it seems to just be getting shorter as I fix things. The rom now compiles with default manifest only needs device tree and kernel source now. something is failing quietly and preventing boot. I'm just working the problem slowly getting it sorted out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been searching and search for lineage OS roms for my XT1575 but the bootloader is Ax052 which is not supported by 14.1 Lineage. I Hope you find a fix for this.
Moto X Pure XT1575 said:
I have been searching and search for lineage OS roms for my XT1575 but the bootloader is Ax052 which is not supported by 14.1 Lineage. I Hope you find a fix for this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have the Lineague 14.2 installed. What I did to eliminate the bootloader check was to edit the uptader-script
Fixing error caused by missing taskstats kernel feature
Hi randomblame,
A quick review please, could you tell us the intended purpose of your project.
Meaning like I'm thinking it's for a "Moto X Pure 2015 (clark)" device isn't it?
Would that be for everyone on this XT1575 device which has upgraded to a stock Nougat kernel and modem?
Or could/would others benefit from it as well with your research here - other moto's?
Any and all answers - thoughts are welcome in understanding the project...
Thanks for the lady power on XDA,
RIF
This device can have a new future. Think about it !
I will look into bootloader incompatibility once I get it running seems like it shouldn't be a big deal. I'm also toying with the idea of a new kernel 3.18 seems like low hanging fruit considering Motorola was kind enough to give us good searchable git history on GitHub of both kernels and the 3.18 source for the Moto z seems to have most of the msm8992 support still. My next step is going to be a new device tree starting as bare bones as possible and populating it properly to figure out this issue. I'll throw up a PayPal link again later a less broken device would be helpful USB port is bad and this is probably the fourth screen I've installed on it but touch only works when it feels like it lol
randomblame said:
I will look into bootloader incompatibility once I get it running seems like it shouldn't be a big deal. I'm also toying with the idea of a new kernel 3.18 seems like low hanging fruit considering Motorola was kind enough to give us good searchable git history on GitHub of both kernels and the 3.18 source for the Moto z seems to have most of the msm8992 support still. My next step is going to be a new device tree starting as bare bones as possible and populating it properly to figure out this issue. I'll throw up a PayPal link again later a less broken device would be helpful USB port is bad and this is probably the fourth screen I've installed on it but touch only works when it feels like it lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm trying to follow along with your posts best as is possible for me - but, so sorry I and as well many others are lame to understand the under-the-hood workings of Android.
Are you saying in such a way that the Moto Pure XT1575, will maybe and with your research efforts move forward to a true PIE OS possibly?
Maybe I'm reading to much into your words.
But, as I follow your posts, you'll advance us Pure device owners beyond the Nougat kernel - or at least try too?
Or yet with your efforts will this yield something like HashBang did for the XT1575 device when a Nougat OS wasn't even a thought of possibility from Motorola for us.
Back then, HashBang had worked the Nougat OS on the Marshmallow kernel and modem - I'm very green to all of this - but that's what I understood.
Still that's good none the less if that will come here from you with PIE on Nougat internals...
Beings Motorola support is dead for our device for anything future of an OS update - not to mention security patches.
If you would spell it out better as any interested XT1575 owners now could grasp the concept here in your efforts - create a buzz for a greater community following. More MXP owners to jump on board as gained support from well wishers.
Is it to early yet for that? Is there a fear that someone could steal it out from under you? Unexpected negativity, or is it just the way you wish to present this to us for the present.
I'm still going to watch and support this project with high hopes no matter what may come in the end...
Could you benefit knowledge from a LineageOS 16 for Moto Z. download?
https://www.cyanogenmods.org/forums/topic/download-moto-z-lineage-os-16-android-9/
For people like me,
Device Tree = https://source.android.com/devices/architecture/dto
and on XDA
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/software/guide-how-to-make-device-tree-phone-t3698419
As for any active developers still left for the XT1575 a big thank you to you all, seems to me like a daunting task to crawl inside of android moreless understand things once your there...
Kernels are only loosly linked to Android versions, Google maintains the Android-common kernel repos which are usually quite far behind mainline Linux, and caf who maintains Qualcomm specific kernels are further behind in general. Literallyany feature required by Android can be backported to an old kernel I'm sure 2.6.27 could run pie but it would need so many patches it would be an unrecognizable mess. It will become progressively more of a nuisance as time goes on to keep patching up 3.10 Pie "requires" 4.4 for new devices but only needs kernel features from 3.18 which I've backported to 3.10. with each new version of Android more assumptions are made about how modern the devices kernel is and what features it has so moving to a newer kernel would be nice and like I said 3.18 seems doable but it will still be quite a bit of work.
Thank you @randomblame I was able to grasp most of that...
Maybe it's too early but, how does Googles Android security patches figure into this - if they are possible to bring us forth from Oct 2017?
Remembering I'm a laymen to the nuts and bolts of android.
I understand your post #16 - Super !
Security patch version is irrelevant when you are building from the latest source
Obnoxiously after a few builds the dedicated 250gb SSD is full and I have to make clean which takes ages, I nooped every thing but the basics didn't include telephony or wifi, ril, audio, Bluetooth GPS nfc etc and left it to build overnight will test after work trying to narrow down the problem
Surface flinger is the culprit
I have the device laying around and getting no use. Will sure donate some $$$. Seeing a los16 with all working hardware would be great.
Only got a couple hours to work on it this weekend, there is an issue where /system/vendor is not symlinked to /vendor early enough and calls for things in /vendor fail thus the issue, since we don't have a physical /vendor partition it can not be mounted immediately via the kernel. Tis annoying. I can change the calls to /system/vendor or maybe make it symlinked earlier when I get a chance