Does the exynos chip on the s3 capable of realtime gaming (graphics)? like when you play that ball game on the tegra 3 and the graphics are realtime
Easily, yes.
I was just wondering that nvidia shield tv is based on android and has some natively running awesome console games like resident evil 5 and Metal gear rising so maybe it is possible to run the games on an android device by fooling the game about the phone gpu or something else. I think adreno 530 found in snapdragon 820 is powerful enough to run these games. Has there been any successful attempts?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46tO_1TH2Fs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWcOti0WGVk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeRS_MWo8t4
Mario Kart 7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUm0mgWkyQU&list=PL7H-PAVyOXWqSv5AndmJCs8QbeMnoUS7s
I wanted to know if there is performance difference between Windows 11 host and WSA client, so I have installed and run Geekbench 5 on both systems.
The benchmark results:
Windows 11
Single Core Score: 848
Multi Core Score: 2297
Details:
LENOVO 81LY - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a LENOVO 81LY with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
LENOVO 81LY - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a LENOVO 81LY with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
WSA ( Android 11 )
Single Core Score: 677
Multi Core Score: 1487
Details:
Google Pixel 5 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Google Pixel 5 with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
Resume:
Although the same hardware ( SoC ) is used when using the WSA a drastic performance loss can be observed: ~25% when running single-core CPU operations, ~35% when running multi-core CPU operations.
Info:
As of version three of GeekBench, the scores have been split into single and multi core categories. The Single Thread CPU benchmark, like all processor benchmarks attempts to estimate how quickly a processor is able to perform a wide variety of calculations. The test issues as series of complex instructions to the processor and times how long the processor takes to complete the tasks. The faster the processor is able to complete the tasks, the higher the benchmark score. The GeekBench Single Thread CPU test only runs one stream of instructions rather than multiple parallel streams per core. The majority of consumer applications (MS World, Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and most games), although multi threaded, rarely utilize more than one thread at a time, so this test, like any single threaded benchmark, can be seen as a reasonable real world test for typical consumer workloads.
Not useful for gaming!
Would've been interesting to add bluestacks to the mix too!
jwoegerbauer said:
I wanted to know if there is performance difference between Windows 11 host and WSA client, so I have installed and run Geekbench 5 on both systems.
The benchmark results:
Windows 11
Single Core Score: 848
Multi Core Score: 2297
Details:
LENOVO 81LY - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a LENOVO 81LY with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
LENOVO 81LY - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a LENOVO 81LY with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
WSA ( Android 11 )
Single Core Score: 677
Multi Core Score: 1487
Details:
Google Pixel 5 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Google Pixel 5 with an AMD Ryzen 5 3500U processor.
browser.geekbench.com
Resume:
Although the same hardware ( SoC ) is used when using the WSA a drastic performance loss can be observed: ~25% when running single-core CPU operations, ~35% when running multi-core CPU operations.
Info:
As of version three of GeekBench, the scores have been split into single and multi core categories. The Single Thread CPU benchmark, like all processor benchmarks attempts to estimate how quickly a processor is able to perform a wide variety of calculations. The test issues as series of complex instructions to the processor and times how long the processor takes to complete the tasks. The faster the processor is able to complete the tasks, the higher the benchmark score. The GeekBench Single Thread CPU test only runs one stream of instructions rather than multiple parallel streams per core. The majority of consumer applications (MS World, Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and most games), although multi threaded, rarely utilize more than one thread at a time, so this test, like any single threaded benchmark, can be seen as a reasonable real world test for typical consumer workloads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eduardo.M said:
Not useful for gaming!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct: Even PUBG Mobile Lite crashes when it is loading.