Audio review for Poco X3 NFC - By DXOMARK - Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC Guides, News, & Discussion

the famous website for camera benchmark and testing DXOMARK recently made a full professional Audio review for Poco X3 NFC , they performed a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions.
so here I'll share some major summaries from their article , and will leave a link for their full article at the end for more in depth details.
Test summary
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Considering the budget price of the Poco X3 NFC, its overall score of 63 is impressive, even if it means it’s an average audio performer. It scored higher than some much higher-priced smartphones, such as the Lenovo Legion Phone Pro, another gamer-centric model, which costs about twice as much.
In playback testing, our engineers found the treble precise, with good high-end extensions. Spatialization came in for praise, with good wideness, localizability, and distance performances. Our engineers noted few artifacts. As for audio playback drawbacks, there is a strong lack of bass, and the excess of high-mids produces nasal-sounding and metallic resonances. Balance seems to be shifted to the right of the device in when in landscape mode. Minimum volume is too low, to the point that dynamic content is barely hearable or simply not hearable at all. The lack of bass heavily hinders precision and punch.
As a recording device, the Poco X3 NFC produces average but consistent timbre performance in each use case. In the spatial attribute, it delivers good wideness. The recording loudness is also good in the memo app. And although there is some pumping and distortion on loud content, the device’s overall artifacts performance was fairly good. The signal-to-noise ratio is below average, with our engineers noting that background noise is very present and sounds unnatural because of the Poco X3 NFC’s midrange-focused and muffled rendering. The envelope is below average, and other than wideness, its spatial performances are not great. In the camera use cases, recording of loudness was below average; maximum sound level was average.
for Playback and Recording sub-scores closer look, check out the full article.
Conclusion
For a smartphone in this price range, the Poco X3 NFC turns in a solid all-round performance — nothing truly exceptional, but no big flaws either. It produces precise treble with good high-end extensions, and the spatial attribute is slightly above average, with good wideness, localizability, and distance performances. The device produces few artifacts. On the other hand, the lack of bass along with an excess of high-mids produces some unpleasant resonances. That lack of bass also dulls bass precision and punch. The minimum volume step is simply too low.
The device’s score as a recording device, while average, still lifts it above several more expensive models. Its timbre performance was average but consistent across the use cases. The Poco X3 NFC did a good job of recording loudness when using the memo app. It also produced fairly clean recordings, with few artifacts. On the negative side, the SNR was below average — background was overly present and unnatural-sounding because it was so midrange-focused. The dynamics performance was also slightly sub-par, with below-average envelope and spatial scores.
source link

for comparison between Poco X3 NFC overall audio test score with other devices, check out this link
surprisingly it beats good phones like Sony Xperia 1 ii , Huawei P40 Pro, Lenovo Legion Pro, and almost match others like LG V60 ThinQ , Samsung S10+, OP 7 Pro ..

You can also check notebookcheck.net review where you can see that this phone has good frequency response in speakers. I believe them more than DXOmark

Hi, in my humble opinion;
Sound deteriorated with update 04, rolled back to 03. Much better sound, Bass & balance.
Depends on which version they tested.??
S

carl.13 said:
Hi, in my humble opinion;
Sound deteriorated with update 04, rolled back to 03. Much better sound, Bass & balance.
Depends on which version they tested.??
S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They toned down the bass for the earpiece speaker since people (on the Xiaomi forums) were complaining about the back vibrating during speaker playback.
The DAC included in the 732G chip is very much cheap and to my ears, sounds inchoherent. Any good third party USB-C DAC will drastically improve the listening experience using the device.

Who cares? Nobody expects Hi-Fi sound from a 2 cm^2 speaker. Use earphones.

Hi, as it happens I care. One of the reasons I have this phone.
With all due respect, you don't know my own personal circumstances; I may have one hand, or no hands. Whereby ear phones are not practical.

enban said:
Who cares? Nobody expects Hi-Fi sound from a 2 cm^2 speaker. Use earphones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually nobody cares. Phone speaker is not even made for listening to music. It's for calls.

[QUOTE = "editheraven, post: 83975295, member: 5091845"]
In realtà non interessa a nessuno. L'altoparlante del telefono non è nemmeno fatto per ascoltare musica. È per le chiamate.
[/CITAZIONE]
ciao amico ho lo stesso problema con l'audio che altre persone sentono anche dietro la cover posteriore se abbasso il volume sai come risolvere? l'hai risolto? Grazie

Related

[Review] Samsung HM6450 Bluetooth Headset

First of all, this is my 2nd hands-free Bluetooth device (my 1st was a [Nokia BH-900] that barely worked on my PC but worked well on my N95).
Ever since the day I got my HTC Hero, I really missed using a wireless headset to listen to music/internet radio.
Thankfully, one day I saw what I wanted and it was for a great price! ($39.99 USD)
Okay, enough with my rambling, time for the good/bad stuff:
*Since every retailer who sells these always lists specs and box contents, I won't bore you with the same boring thing.
Pros:
+Once paired, it connects easily with my HTC Hero [Elelinux-7.1.0-RC1-Hero-v3.1], Macbook Air, PC [Vista Business/Windows 7 Professional] laptops. Obviously, not all at the same time.
+Has multiple earbud accessories for numerous ear sizes.
+Does not have a goofy blue flashing indicator.
+Once on your ear, it won't come off unless you want it to.
+You can use your own headphones in conjunction with the headset.
+The 3.7V, 100mA gives about ~6 hours of continuous use (videos and music).
Now for the very short list of the negatives...
Cons:
-The entire unit is housed in a cheap plastic shell (my unit fell to pieces when I received it [2 little dabs of glue quickly fixed this])
-Even though this unit is the same standard size as the newest headsets in the market, it feels a bit heavy. I think this is due to the fact that I don't use it everyday and I have weak ears canals.
-The "text-to-voice" software in the Android marketplace is worthless with the HTC Hero.
Although a lot of the functions can't be used on the Hero (text-to-speech messages/email/time, headset locator, etc), you probably could use it on other phones/devices.
If you have a HTC Hero and want/need a wired/wireless headset, buy this unit! It has everything you'll ever need. Period.
Finally, since I only use this as a wireless headset, I never tested the microphone quality. I still haven't developed the backbone to wear this out in the public .
Pics (I can take more upon request):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://sellout.woot.com/ has it for $29.99 today. Anyone else have this and want to comment on their experience? Most of the reviews on Amazon are poor.
Hi CGeyser, could you please check with the manual and advise what's the frequency range of the HM6450 (regarding the audio playback)? I try to identify that online but got no clues anywhere.THX
BTW, how's the noise reduction with its dual-mic?
The manual doesn't say anything about any frequency range of the phone and audio playback. It only shows pairing instructions and liability statements.
I use my wired stereo headphones in conjunction with the headset (my ear canals are sensitive to the weight of BT headsets). I can clearly hear the caller and they can hear me as well. It eliminates the majority of background noise while allowing you to hear/to be heard. This configuration isn't very convenient, but it allows you to use the device without looking like a goofy businessman/businesswoman.
I have yet to use the BT headset by itself so I can't attest to the audio/mic quality.
Job21 said:
Hi CGeyser, could you please check with the manual and advise what's the frequency range of the HM6450 (regarding the audio playback)? I try to identify that online but got no clues anywhere.THX
BTW, how's the noise reduction with its dual-mic?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks CGeyser. Your input is already doing much more help than Samsung's support (like you said, nothing indicative could be found from their manual)
Job21, just curious, why do you want to know the frequency range?
I imagine that its the same if not similar to other BT headsets already out in the market.
Are you worried that it'll interfere with your wireless network(s)? If so, you should be able to easily change your router's settings.
CGeyser said:
Job21, just curious, why do you want to know the frequency range?
I imagine that its the same if not similar to other BT headsets already out in the market.
Are you worried that it'll interfere with your wireless network(s)? If so, you should be able to easily change your router's settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry for confusing u.
for frequency range i was referring to the headsets output (bass to treble) to earphone.
since i'm planning to get a quality pair,and hope hm6450 would get me a wider range and best utilize the earphone
ps i finally manage to identify user manual of each hm6450 / hm3700 /hs3000 from 3 diff site of samsung worldwide, what a good support
Hmmm...as of now, I don't know of any BT headset that'll allow you to directly change the bass & treble on-the-fly. Maybe with some software on your phone "might" be able to change it (virtually/simulated).
On the headset, you can only change the volume and the device(s) it gets paired to.
As it is now, the sound quality is excellent as any good BT headsets get. Not as good as as my wireless Sennheiser headphones, but still very good.
CGeyser said:
Hmmm...as of now, I don't know of any BT headset that'll allow you to directly change the bass & treble on-the-fly. Maybe with some software on your phone "might" be able to change it (virtually/simulated).
On the headset, you can only change the volume and the device(s) it gets paired to.
As it is now, the sound quality is excellent as any good BT headsets get. Not as good as as my wireless Sennheiser headphones, but still very good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking if this HM6450 or someother BT headset would allow most of the original signal to feed to the earphone (just checked, it should be frequency RESPONSE indeed).
But like you said, there should be standard output among different brand and gives no big difference at all.
Sorry I couldn't help you as much as I could. I'm not really an audiophile.

[Q] What is a good Blue tooth Speaker?

I ended up getting this Anker Portable Speaker after some great reviews on Amazon. I've had a couple generic no names that broke or blew out quickly.
http://www.ianker.com/product/99ANSP9901-BSA
The MP141 is very nice looking and super easy to pair. The speaker is very heavy-indicating a large magnet, and has a nice matte rubber exterior. There is a micro USB charge port, aux stereo jack and a charge light indicater. Apart from thevolume switch, the buttons operate the speaker. Volume up/ down and a play/pause. All the parts appear to be of the highest quality. Most importantly, the sound is very rich. I use it in my office which is about 12 X 12. I can walk out about 15-20 without losing connection. What's more impressive is I can still hear it well out side. Unfortunately the unit does distort at the highest volume- but most speakers do. The company boasts 20hrs. I have used mine for over 25 and is still going!
The speaker also has a microphone to answer incoming calls. The mic. quality is good and almost none of callers could recognize I was using the speaker. There is also a sound that indicates a successful connection or incoming call. One drawback is that for some reason, this notification sound is always super loud-regardless of the volume seting on the speaker. It can be startling if you have the speaker volume low. Overall I am very pleased with this product and feel comfortable recommending it to anyone looking for a high quality speaker without the high end price.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Samsung GS3 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I would go with a Bass egg
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00DJ...f=mp_s_a_1_1&qid=1391670231&sr=8-1&precache=1
Sounds great
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
I bought a Jawbone Big Jambox about 1 year ago. Absolutely LOVE it! Incredible sound, battery life, call quality on both ends, etc. There isn't a single thing I can say bad, or even slightly negative, about it. I highly recommend it to anyone who has $300 to spend on bluetooth speaker!
SwiftKey'ed from my White Sprint Note 3 via XDA Premium
Did I mention this one is only $35?
I think it's a great product for the price. :sly:
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
stanglifemike said:
I bought a Jawbone Big Jambox about 1 year ago. Absolutely LOVE it! Incredible sound, battery life, call quality on both ends, etc. There isn't a single thing I can say bad, or even slightly negative, about it. I highly recommend it to anyone who has $300 to spend on bluetooth speaker!
SwiftKey'ed from my White Sprint Note 3 via XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1!! Terrific speaker..
The JBL Flip is amazing.
The sol deck is my favorite by far. Made by sol republic with motorola. It has an audio in port and audio out port comes with aux cable. The look and feel of it is great, and sounds amazing. It actually has bass too. Also the connectivity is very long range
Sent from my SM-N900A using xda app-developers app
I'm using a regular Jambox (not mini, not BIG) and I really like it. Honestly the sound is great for it's size and the battery is superb. Paid 85.00 for it on eBay.
There are now a LOT of players in the bluetooth speaker market.
If I were buying now I would make sure I got one with bluetooth 3.0 or higher, Apt-X, and ideally NFC also. Some degree of protection from the elements is included with an increasing number of these too, well worthwhile if you can get it with the other features and within your budget.
Braven have some very nice ones, I have the 850 which has Apt-X, BT 3.0, 20 hour battery life (or less if you want to use it to charge devices, it has a 8,800mA battery inside that charges at 2A), stellar build quality, very good sound. They also have a smaller form factor one, the 710 that adds the NFC and splash/dust resistance.
I also have the Loewe Speaker 2Go, which is the best I have ever heard and has BT 3.0 and Apt-X and NFC and an 8 hour battery (again one that can be used to charge other devices, although that is less practical than with the 850 as the battery capacity is much smaller).
there's two which i've purchased. the first is the tdk life on record:
http://www.amazon.com/TDK-Life-Record-Wireless-Weatherproof/dp/B008VMT2HQ
this speaker gets LOUD and doesn't distort in the higher volumes. for the price, it's a VERY GOOD speaker. it's weatherproof so if you're active and need something that can be taken to the beach or beside the pool, this is the speaker for you.
it has an audio in port for non bluetooth devices, a usb port for charging your phone / mp3 player, and is usable as a speaker phone. even though it's small in size, the speaker has some weight... which is generally a sign of good materials used and good construction.
i would've kept that speaker if i never heard my current speaker. the sony srs-btx500:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-SRSBTX500-Portable-Bluetooth-Wireless/dp/B00B2G3R5G
i don't need my speaker to be outside, it's just indoors. as far as sound... this has enough bass to make it enjoyable, without it being overpowered. with some speakers it's just ALL bass. you get no lows, mids, or highs. you can hear everything on the sony. there's different audio modes (normal, bass boost, and bass boost w / surround). depending on what i'm listening to, i switch the sound mode.
the speaker has nfc, it's bluetooth compatible (of course), has an audio in port for non bluetooth devices, has speaker phone capabilities, and also a usb port for charging your phone / mp3 player.
the one thing i LOVE about the speaker is the surround sound. no matter where i place it, i hear equal sound in both ears. normally when you place the speaker on the left hand side, you can tell that's where the speaker is. with the sony, i can place it on the left or right hand side of my desk (where i keep it) and the sound is equal. really amazing.

[Review] Kmashi Arma K1 -Bluetooth Speaker, 5000mah Battery Pack, Flashlight All-in-1

Hey, here is a quick review for the Kmashi Arma K1 Bluetooth Speaker (with a twist). I just had the chance to try this speaker out and I must say I'm pleasantly surprised with it. Bluetooth speakers are so awesome because of the ease of use, and also because they kind of broke the Apple monopoly on speakers of the phone. Before you could only use the Apple Docks which never worked with any Android phone and it also had so many other problems, like broken ports etc. I'd say this speaker in particular is perfect for camping trips, beach bonfires, and also Jamming out on your bike. My favorite part is the insane battery life of 35hours because the standard now a days is about 10 hours or less. Heres what I like about them:
Pro:
-Pretty good sound even when its loud
-Insanely long battery life (probably due to the speakers feeding off the 4800Mah battery which is used for the battery pack portion of this device)
-USB battery pack charger
-Water/ Sand/Dust proof. Also shockproof
-Good Wireless Range
-Grippy rubber exterior
-Flashlight. It's quite bright
-Can play straight from MicroSD cards. Great for when you don't want to deal with bluetooth pairing etc
-Comes with bike mounting kit
Cons:
-When the device is turned on it speakers, "Connection" which I found cheesy. It also says "Dis-connection" when bluetooth drops off. I think a beep would have sufficed
-No AUX in port
The fact that it is a 3 in 1 allows me to pack lighter because the flashlight is actually bright enough and the battery pack packs quite a bit of energy. It's cool that it allows me to keep my phone plugged/charging while I am playing audio from it. Kmashi sent me this speaker to provide an evaluation for them, and I would say I am very please with it. It sells on Amazon for $37 normally, but its on promotion for $22 ($15 off) if you use this coupon code : IFUJLMOX with the seller eCase. At that price I'd say its a steal.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
master4g said:
Hey, here is a quick review for the Kmashi Arma K1 Bluetooth Speaker (with a twist). I just had the chance to try this speaker out and I must say I'm pleasantly surprised with it. Bluetooth speakers are so awesome because of the ease of use, and also because they kind of broke the Apple monopoly on speakers of the phone. Before you could only use the Apple Docks which never worked with any Android phone and it also had so many other problems, like broken ports etc. I'd say this speaker in particular is perfect for camping trips, beach bonfires, and also Jamming out on your bike. My favorite part is the insane battery life of 35hours because the standard now a days is about 10 hours or less. Heres what I like about them:
Pro:
-Pretty good sound even when its loud
-Insanely long battery life (probably due to the speakers feeding off the 4800Mah battery which is used for the battery pack portion of this device)
-USB battery pack charger
-Water/ Sand/Dust proof. Also shockproof
-Good Wireless Range
-Grippy rubber exterior
-Flashlight. It's quite bright
-Can play straight from MicroSD cards. Great for when you don't want to deal with bluetooth pairing etc
-Comes with bike mounting kit
Cons:
-When the device is turned on it speakers, "Connection" which I found cheesy. It also says "Dis-connection" when bluetooth drops off. I think a beep would have sufficed
-No AUX in port
The fact that it is a 3 in 1 allows me to pack lighter because the flashlight is actually bright enough and the battery pack packs quite a bit of energy. It's cool that it allows me to keep my phone plugged/charging while I am playing audio from it. Kmashi sent me this speaker to provide an evaluation for them, and I would say I am very please with it. It sells on Amazon for $37 normally, but its on promotion for $22 ($15 off) if you use this coupon code : IFUJLMOX with the seller eCase. At that price I'd say its a steal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 01:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:17 PM ----------
master4g said:
Hey, here is a quick review for the Kmashi Arma K1 Bluetooth Speaker (with a twist). I just had the chance to try this speaker out and I must say I'm pleasantly surprised with it. Bluetooth speakers are so awesome because of the ease of use, and also because they kind of broke the Apple monopoly on speakers of the phone. Before you could only use the Apple Docks which never worked with any Android phone and it also had so many other problems, like broken ports etc. I'd say this speaker in particular is perfect for camping trips, beach bonfires, and also Jamming out on your bike. My favorite part is the insane battery life of 35hours because the standard now a days is about 10 hours or less. Heres what I like about them:
Pro:
-Pretty good sound even when its loud
-Insanely long battery life (probably due to the speakers feeding off the 4800Mah battery which is used for the battery pack portion of this device)
-USB battery pack charger
-Water/ Sand/Dust proof. Also shockproof
-Good Wireless Range
-Grippy rubber exterior
-Flashlight. It's quite bright
-Can play straight from MicroSD cards. Great for when you don't want to deal with bluetooth pairing etc
-Comes with bike mounting kit
Cons:
-When the device is turned on it speakers, "Connection" which I found cheesy. It also says "Dis-connection" when bluetooth drops off. I think a beep would have sufficed
-No AUX in port
The fact that it is a 3 in 1 allows me to pack lighter because the flashlight is actually bright enough and the battery pack packs quite a bit of energy. It's cool that it allows me to keep my phone plugged/charging while I am playing audio from it. Kmashi sent me this speaker to provide an evaluation for them, and I would say I am very please with it. It sells on Amazon for $37 normally, but its on promotion for $22 ($15 off) if you use this coupon code : IFUJLMOX with the seller eCase. At that price I'd say its a steal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
O I y'ax m c x m 0 dj looking ķ uni
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

General Google announces Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro powered with Google Tensor SoC

Google announces Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro powered with Google Tensor SoC.
As mentioned by Google, Tensor SoC can process Google’s most powerful AI and ML models directly.
via - https://www.gizmobolt.com/2021/08/0...d-pixel-6-pro-powered-with-google-tensor-soc/
Source -
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1422226005339557889
The device with less space above the camera bar is Google Pixel 6. The device with more space above the camera bar is Google Pixel 6 Pro. Pixel 6 Pro will have 3 cameras modules, including a telephoto lens with a 4x optical zoom.
Official Images :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
But, can it grill?
LeDiable said:
But, can it grill?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully it won't give off enough heat to grill.
But the Pro model Pixel 6 from all I've been reading sure appears to be a show stopper!! Think I'll get a 5a in about 6+ months used. Looking forward to these though and I hope Google brings it 110% solid this year! If they don't it will definitely not be good for them that's for sure. Love my 4XL though! Hoping the 6 has zero issues and does all it's said to be able to do.
flash713 said:
Hopefully it won't give off enough heat to grill.
But the Pro model Pixel 6 from all I've been reading sure appears to be a show stopper!! Think I'll get a 5a in about 6+ months used. Looking forward to these though and I hope Google brings it 110% solid this year! If they don't it will definitely not be good for them that's for sure. Love my 4XL though! Hoping the 6 has zero issues and does all it's said to be able to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm hoping it cook's roms well in our Developer kitchens!
I'll be excited if Google makes a compact version of a Pixel 6.
A compact version smaller than my Pixel 4a. It would need analogue audio out, preferably via USB-C as opposed to the obsolete 3.5mm connector from the 1950's. My old Pixel 2 requires a relatively expensive pair of USB-C earphones with its own (crappy quality) DAC chip. I think the Pixel 5 doesn't provide analogue audio through the USB-C port neither (correct me if I'm wrong). I once had a Sony XZ2 Compact which provided analogue audio out through the USB-C port which meant I could use cheaper earphones and would ironically still sound better due to a better DAC chip built into the phone itself. I would love to have a compact Pixel which has a little fat form factor like a Sony XZ2 Compact. Am currently still using my Pixel 4a . I like it and all and was the best choice available to me at the time I had to buy a new phone, but is still too big to use single handed comfortably and is restrictive in my pocket when climbing around tight spaces on construction sites. There are other small phones out there, but they don't support custom OS with relockable bootloader such as GrapheneOS or CalyxOS.
I feel like Tensor Cores in Pixel 6 are built to run the 'TensorFlow' open source ML platform used in Pixel 2's portrait modes -- especially given that Google has dropped pixel 4's IR hardware based depth mapping entirely and has gone to single lense hole punch front facing cameras in favor of longer exposure times over infared sensors to do low light work.
I feel like Tensor Cores in Pixel 6 are built to run the 'TensorFlow' open source ML platform used in Pixel 2's portrait modes -- especially given that Google has dropped pixel 4's IR hardware based depth mapping entirely and has gone to single lense hole punch front facing cameras in favor of longer exposure times over infared sensors to do low light work.
www.myaarpmedicare.com
Gusikowskib said:
I feel like Tensor Cores in Pixel 6 are built to run the 'TensorFlow' open source ML platform used in Pixel 2's portrait modes -- especially given that Google has dropped pixel 4's IR hardware based depth mapping entirely and has gone to single lense hole punch front facing cameras in favor of longer exposure times over infared sensors to do low light work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you mean to double post and please a suspect link at the bottom *I worry*
Amazing performance..
Srbija2012 said:
Amazing performance..
View attachment 5409887
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sarcasm aside, we don't know if this is real (another clearly fake one has also been spotted on Geekbench), whether it was using the latest software (if real), etc... Also, benchmarks don't always translate into real world use.
But if these numbers do turn out to be accurate, it will be disappointing for sure from a strictly benchmarking point of view without consideration of AI, etc.
Lughnasadh said:
But if these numbers do turn out to be accurate, it will be disappointing for sure from a strictly benchmarking point of view without consideration of AI, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When word was out that Google would be premiering their own TENSOR core CPU blah blah, people were carrying on about how it will blow everything out of the water... It was important then....
Now that initial; performance leaks suggest its nothing short of a mid spec CPU (at this state), it doesn't matter any more?
Srbija2012 said:
When word was out that Google would be premiering their own TENSOR core CPU blah blah, people were carrying on about how it will blow everything out of the water... It was important then....
Now that initial; performance leaks suggest its nothing short of a mid spec CPU (at this state), it doesn't matter any more?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did I say it doesn't matter? No, I said from a benchmarking point of view it would be disappointing. Of course that matters. But additionally, benchmarking is not the all end be all.
And like I said, we don't even know if this "leak" is real or even accurate. We'll actually have to wait and see what the benchmarks actually end up being before drawing any firm conclusions.
Lughnasadh said:
Did I say it doesn't matter? No, I said from a benchmarking point of view it would be disappointing. Of course that matters. But additionally, benchmarking is not the all end be all.
And like I said, we don't even know if this "leak" is real or even accurate. We'll actually have to wait and see what the benchmarks actually end up being before drawing any firm conclusions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe its real, but i also believe there is still some more HW/SW tweaking to be done...
Bear in mind, Google have stated they this will be a premium priced device, so one would expect premium SW and HW.
Pixel camera HW and SW have always been sensational...
i want to ask about the availability of pixel 6? which countries do pixel 6 available?

General Sony Xperia PRO-i vs Nokia Pureview 808 [2021 vs 2012]

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
https://trackerninja.codeberg.page/post/sony-xperia-pro-i-vs-nokia-pureview-808-2021-vs-2012/
#sony #xpreria #pro-i #nokia #808 #nokia808 #spacedrone808 #trackerninja #trackerninja808 #comparison #detail #resolution #review
Terrific stuff here. A friend just had his 808 rebuilt. (Then he bought a Samsung! Who would-a-thunk-it?) In other comparisons like this I notice the Sony tends to bring some yellow or off-white tone to the photos. What had the colors that are closer to the actual?
Colors is not an issue here, they could be easily corrected in RAW or raster editor.
But resolution is a disappointment. I've expected at least 20% advance over Nokia.
spacedrone808 said:
Colors is not an issue here, they could be easily corrected in RAW or raster editor.
But resolution is a disappointment. I've expected at least 20% advance over Nokia.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah. Got yah.
There is a big mistake. For Nokia 808 there exists a number of mods, one is even made by a russian hacker Osenok, one of many that let you shoot in full resolution with 100% jpeg quality.
Having seen the examples and comparisons, even the xiaomi / samsung with 108mp sensors couldn't resolve more details than the more-than-10-year-old Nokia 808.
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Walking on the wild side: upping the Nokia 808 to full 41MP status?
Following an interesting Twitter exchange, and in light of the paucity of new updates coming out for the Nokia 808 PureView, I'm more inclined to give publicity to what are normally classed as 'hacks', breaking through the usual Symbian OS safeguards in order to achieve extra functionality. In...
www.allaboutsymbian.com
Search for Nokia 808 mod.
saved-j said:
There is a big mistake. For Nokia 808 there exists a number of mods, one is even made by a russian hacker Osenok, one of many that let you shoot in full resolution with 100% jpeg quality.
Having seen the examples and comparisons, even the xiaomi / samsung with 108mp sensors couldn't resolve more details than the more-than-10-year-old Nokia 808.
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Walking on the wild side: upping the Nokia 808 to full 41MP status?
Following an interesting Twitter exchange, and in light of the paucity of new updates coming out for the Nokia 808 PureView, I'm more inclined to give publicity to what are normally classed as 'hacks', breaking through the usual Symbian OS safeguards in order to achieve extra functionality. In...
www.allaboutsymbian.com
Search for Nokia 808 mod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test was done with mod applied.
As for modern so called "108 mpix":
XIAOMI MI 11 ULTRA VS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808 [2021 vs 2012] - █▓▒░ Unlisted Retrograde Slacker
trackerninja.codeberg.page
808 is unmatched till today.
Enjoy.
spacedrone808 said:
Test was done with mod applied.
As for modern so called "108 mpix":
XIAOMI MI 11 ULTRA VS NOKIA PUREVIEW 808 [2021 vs 2012] - █▓▒░ Unlisted Retrograde Slacker
trackerninja.codeberg.page
808 is unmatched till today.
Enjoy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. Thanks. Cool stuff. Agree about the Sony Pro-i. Less computational play.
saved-j said:
And the Pro-i with its 12mp is no resolution beast in any place. Any flagship with a 48/50/64/108mp sensor would beat it in daylight with no sweat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pixel quality wise Pro-i easily excels all these artificially inflated flagships, with fake mpixels and aquarel processing with artifacts.
spacedrone808 said:
Pixel quality wise Pro-i easily excels all these artificially inflated flagships, with fake mpixels and aquarel processing with artifacts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes agree. We get to choose our flavor of digital rendering by phone manufacturer. No different than Kodachrome, Extachrome, and Fuji film renderings in the day.

Categories

Resources