need help.. - iPAQ rw6828, XDA Atom ROM Development

anyone know ROM with MANILA 2D for xda Atom??

he said more good if it already exists manila application on his innate ROM. much lighter and does not consume a lot of capacity.
thx before..

Related

I need a FAST rom

Hi
Have a profhet G4, but i have now tried EVO8, Transfomer 1.0/1.1, Touch IX and Crystal V4.
They all run to slow even with xcpuscalar, and battery time is not good enough for my daily use. (Not using Wi-FI)
So should i try to go back on a WM5 rom ?, or has anyone good experiences with a WM6 rom? Maybe i should try with a clean WM6 rom? (link?)
thanks.
BR. Flemming
If Crystal V4 (Personal Edition) is not fast enough for you, I think you should cook your own ROM, 'cause that's all that left. If you do find a Faster ROM, I'd love to hear about it.
all now available wm6 rom is slower than wm5
digifan said:
all now available wm6 rom is slower than wm5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it? All this while I thought WM6 (pure ones without TouchFlo and other fancy add-on) should run faster. I don't know cause used WM5 (think it was a very old release) for like 1 day plus then upgraded already.
Just open the Windows folder or settings in an WM5 Rom after you used WM6 and you will see which one runs faster.....you should also compare booting times! oO
In fact: Nearly any WM6 rom is faster than the WM5 ones...try it and you will see!
Greetz
digifan, if you say that WM6 is slower than WM5... then you have no experience in WM6...
BioniX said:
digifan, if you say that WM6 is slower than WM5... then you have no experience in WM6...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. If more speed is needed , there is always battery plugin
Finally, at some point you're facing the hardware limit...
BioniX said:
digifan, if you say that WM6 is slower than WM5... then you have no experience in WM6...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well spoken indeed.
@digifan
BTW, if you feel that WM5 is faster than WM& why the hell are you interested to upgrade. Stay as it is, man
Stuclint said:
If Crystal V4 (Personal Edition) is not fast enough for you, I think you should cook your own ROM, 'cause that's all that left. If you do find a Faster ROM, I'd love to hear about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think too.
Well I'm happy that you found Crystal V4 fast. Recently there has been some development in ROM cooking world and consequently the crystal V5 will be even more stable and fast ! Crystal V5 will be a clean ROM with VOIP. The free storage memory will be somewhere around : 46 Mg .
This rom will be released in two to three weeks
good
waiting
Shark_XXL said:
Just open the Windows folder or settings in an WM5 Rom after you used WM6 and you will see which one runs faster.....you should also compare booting times! oO
In fact: Nearly any WM6 rom is faster than the WM5 ones...try it and you will see!
Greetz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree with you. I was almost abandon my Pocket pC before WM6 make my day again.
In era WM5 I totally refused to reboot due to slow booting time. WM6 safe a day.
Good luck!
i think you can enjoy htc photo album gestures and cube and other gr8 interfaces which wm6 has offered rather than think of speed ,you see there is a difference between a vintage glider(wm5) and a boeing 747 (wm6)and a f-16 fighter aircraft and a chopper , all have their own specific usage advantages and disadvantages ,no one of them will provide you everything at one place. you cant take a ferrari on country rally and if a country rally car comes to ferrari race it won't win .they have their own routes to go into.
WOW!!! hma4, 46MB wud b a treat!! I simply luv the freedom a clean ROM gives
46 MB.. It is really good... As I said before, you are one of the greatest....
serious speed issue
Guys,
I do have a Prophet as well as a Tornado. They seem to be identical in terms of hardware, but the even with the default WM5 roms the Tornado is way faster (windows folder opens in 2-3 seconds while the Prophet takes a well 6-7 seconds).
If you add special features to the Prophet, such as HTC Home, and a couple of other gimmicks, then it can be painfully slow (even with my cpu o/c at 273MHz). I did a hard reset to mine a couple of weeks ago and now I need over 20 seconds to open windows folder. I don't know if it is the rom to blame (I am currently using a PDAViet ver 4.0.0.0WWE) but we have to do something about it! Even the phone features are getting slow
Does everybody confirm that Crystal V4 is the fastest rom around? I have also in mind a TNT Greek rom (since I am Greek). Is that any good in terms of speed?
hma4 said:
Well I'm happy that you found Crystal V4 fast. Recently there has been some development in ROM cooking world and consequently the crystal V5 will be even more stable and fast ! Crystal V5 will be a clean ROM with VOIP. The free storage memory will be somewhere around : 46 Mg .
This rom will be released in two to three weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ooo,yes.the best news for my weekend.
agha hamed ma az tarafdaraye paro pa ghorse shomaiim
baese eftekhare maiid.
thanx
hma4 said:
Crystal V5 will be a clean ROM with VOIP. The free storage memory will be somewhere around : 46 Mg .
This rom will be released in two to three weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm waiting for it
It would be the perfect WM6 rom for prophet
hma4 said:
Well I'm happy that you found Crystal V4 fast. Recently there has been some development in ROM cooking world and consequently the crystal V5 will be even more stable and fast ! Crystal V5 will be a clean ROM with VOIP. The free storage memory will be somewhere around : 46 Mg .
This rom will be released in two to three weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is good news

Manila 2D incoperation

To all Manila 2D ROM creators,
Your work is incredible and well appreciated. I find all ROMs have their strength and weakness so it's up to the end-user(s) to decided which ROM best suit their needs. In my end, I find the challenge in creating ROM for the prophet is speed and stability. I proposed the incoopration of Homescreen ++ to all Manilla 2D to improve Prophet speed because loading it seperately is high unstable. Please consider.
+++revise later.
HI damikey
I think your suggest is very good.
Each ROM maker should cooperate in M2D.

Pointui 2.0

UPDATE: many themes for pointui 2.0 released:
check out http://community.pointui.com/topic/theme-vizta-v10-1
very pretty...can we have a rom with this burned in ankit...its MUCH faster than touchflo!
Hi...
new version of PointUI released today...
Looks VERY exciting and pretty...am going to try it tonight on my gene 3400i with sumit's manillavanilla ROM after disabling touchflo on it...
My earlier experience with pointui ver 1.51a was QUITE good apart from some stability issues...
This one must be better...and faster than other UIs.
Shall post details once i have it on my system!
Regards
Hotdoc0
hotdoc0 said:
Hi...
new version of PointUI released today...
Looks VERY exciting and pretty...am going to try it tonight on my gene 3400i with sumit's manillavanilla ROM after disabling touchflo on it...
My earlier experience with pointui ver 1.51a was QUITE good apart from some stability issues...
This one must be better...and faster than other UIs.
Shall post details once i have it on my system!
Regards
Hotdoc0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey thanks for the info buddy. Tried it. First 15 minutes impression:
- Display like a today plugin is good as it allows one to use the tradional start menu too.
- Animations are cool but a bit sluggish on gene.
- Memory usage is almost double the TouchFlo's :O it hogs 8091 KB of memory, touchflo's manilla 2D shows around 4500 KB.
- Not as responsive as Previous Version or as TouchFLO.
-Slideshow didn't worked at first go, had to configure it twice to get it to work.
-No start menu icon created. Will check if it works as a today plugin or something.
So overall impressive piece of work, but requires a bit of tweaking from the developer's side.
Checked it after removing M2D from Sumit's MVUltimate ROM, honestly didn't impress me much. If anyday i will switch to eye candy with this device, I will definitely part with M2D at least as things stand now . I believe it has miles to go before it can come into compettition.
surely it isnt a fraction as pretty as m2d...maybe we'll have to wai for the ver 3.0
it might be much faster however if burned into the romi feel!
what say ankit?
Regards
Hotdoc0
hotdoc0 said:
surely it isnt a fraction as pretty as m2d...maybe we'll have to wai for the ver 3.0
it might be much faster however if burned into the romi feel!
what say ankit?
Regards
Hotdoc0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cooked it into a ROM derived from MVUltimate by Sumit (krazy), Not much impressed though. Got it to work. speed is ofcourse improved, if you want, I will post a link from where you can download and check in your Gene (BTW I am not an experienced cooker, so don't blame me if your Gene is bricked, Hey it worked for me ).
hi...
great work...
i tried it on ankits rom...and well speed is PRETTY good...but eye candy is anadequate...and honestly, the speed and stability of ankits 6.5 vs rom has me hooked and im not changing my rom till ankit releases a newer version!
...but great work mate!
Regards
Hotdoc0

Manilla 2.5 for Atom Life?

The fantastic HD2 came out with Manilla 2.5 (HTC sense). Anyway for porting this over to the atom life?
I hope this is possible, even though I understand that the HD2 has a far far better processor that can handle the load compared the atom. There seem to plenty of 6.5 ROMS - any manilla 2.5 or even 2.0 ROMS?
Well, the Atom lacks good 3D support. So in the end it's not possible to have Manila 2.0/2.5 on our Atom. Next point is that the Atom has only 64MB of RAM - this is definitly too low to run manila smoothly. And it looks so that no one is even interested in porting Manila 2.5 to QVGA.
morpheuszg said:
Well, the Atom lacks good 3D support. So in the end it's not possible to have Manila 2.0/2.5 on our Atom. Next point is that the Atom has only 64MB of RAM - this is definitly too low to run manila smoothly. And it looks so that no one is even interested in porting Manila 2.5 to QVGA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers, yeah I thought It was useless to keep my hopes up. I might end up buying the HD2, so we'll see
hi
very good and nice manila 2.5
why m2d 2.5 can't use in atom life
sory bad english
kritdw said:
The fantastic HD2 came out with Manilla 2.5 (HTC sense). Anyway for porting this over to the atom life?
I hope this is possible, even though I understand that the HD2 has a far far better processor that can handle the load compared the atom. There seem to plenty of 6.5 ROMS - any manilla 2.5 or even 2.0 ROMS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a manila 2d.cab just for atom life, cooked and tested on my atomlife for 1month now, still in good shape.
checkout the some links here at XDA, i forgot where i got it from. If you still need it, PM me [email protected]
Good luck.

mixing manilas

hi
well i have strange question
is it possible (and easy ) to mix manilas?
i mean for example adding people tab from manila 2.5 to manila 2.1?
is it much better in 2.5 but whole manila 2.5 is to "heavy" for raphael so?
sense 2.5 is like a single structure, i tried asking around for a twitter tab port over to 2.1 but they said its gonna be real tough or not possible at all, because some of the stuff that u want from 2.5 relies on the rest of the sense packages
what about some other shells? maybe sbp?
manila 2.5 on raph is slow but 2.1 got some bugs i ve tested over 10 roms in past week and everyone has some bad issues
edit
is it possible to cook both manilas in one rom?
and i as a user could change it in items (today options)?
palkens said:
what about some other shells? maybe sbp?
manila 2.5 on raph is slow but 2.1 got some bugs i ve tested over 10 roms in past week and everyone has some bad issues
edit
is it possible to cook both manilas in one rom?
and i as a user could change it in items (today options)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is that 2.5 is not intended for the Raph. 2.5 was ported over from the Pure which has a 1Ghz processor while the Raph is around 500 mhz. half the speed trying to run the same system and you can see why it is slow and sluggish. There is no way to make 2.5 run better on the raph due to it's hardware limitation.

Categories

Resources