Trying to edit my init.rc to mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p2 on boot, starting to think beating myself to death with the phone would be easier. I have followed the tutorial here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=443994
And tried the alternate method listed here:
http://android-dls.com/wiki/index.php?title=HOWTO:_Unpack,_Edit,_and_Re-Pack_Boot_Images
But no matter what I do the image never repacks right, I'm only changing 1 line so the file size should stay the same, but when I repack, I get 3.5mb with splitimg, 3.6mb when trying repack-boot.img, 4.4mb when using mkbootimg, and I'm starting off with a 4.2mb boot.img. Even weirder, when I use the splitimg method, the old and new boot.img.ramdisk.gz are the same size, I use the same kernel, and it still repacks a different size than the original. Erasing everything every time to make sure no files are being overwritten. Using ubuntu 9.10. What could cause a different file size and non-booting image each time? Also, when I use the split_bootimg script on the new file, the kernel & ramdisk are the same size. So does that mean it's throwing out data not related to those 2 things, and that's what's killing it? Or is it like the Nexus, where you have to add --base to mkbootimg, and if so, where do I get the number to go with --base?
Watch the video in my signature it'll help you
Thanks, I was already doing it right, but watching your video I decided to redownload the files you had, my mkbootfs was corrupting the ramdisk, it is a good tutorial though, easy to follow even without sound.
I had downloaded a version of this file from a post embedded deep inside one of the threads over here (sorry can't find it right now), but upon examination of its contents, I discovered some issues:
1. The checksums on the files in contained in the the original zip file showed that B&N had at least two versions of 1.3.0 update you can download from them, and the zip I got contained an older version so I put in the latest files in there.
2. There were unnecessary files included inside the original zip file, I deleted those, and only included what was needed.
3. There were errors in the script syntax, which I corrected, so that the proper commands are run during the update, and the proper sed substitutions are made during the editing of the unpacked init.rc inside the ramdisk.
What this zip will do is replace any older version of a B&N ROM on the alternate eMMC partitions of a dual booting configurations to the latest versions. This will prevent B&N from pushing the 1.3.0 update to you OTA, and messing up your dual boot setup. Just put the zip on your sdcard, boot into CWM recovery, and apply the zip. I apologize in advance for not giving credit to the original creators of the scripts here.
Note: There have been two different protocols for a dual booting u-boot.bin, with an older one relying on the files u-boot.altimg, and u-boot.altram to specify the names of the secondary boot ramdisk and kernel, and a newer one assuming that they are named uAltRam, and uAltImg respectively. This update conforms to the new u-boot.bin protocol. If you are still using the old one, you will have to get root access to /boot and edit the two files to point to uAltRam and uAltImg.
So if you want try it out, here it is:
http://www.mediafire.com/?gcrpzzc0kdoxcjx
MD5 Sum: 51e24c1e5eff11ba5ea481a63f7404eb
Update
I have now uploaded files for B&N Update 1.4.1.
The first file (MD5 Sum: 4ff1d9764663278c3f51e2e2c9d841a6) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on secondary /system through CWM:
https://rapidshare.com/files/52135913/secondary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1.zip
The second file (MD5 Sum: c1506816fbfb8c419fbbc4afe1b12887) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on primary /system through CWM without messing with recovery;
https://rapidshare.com/files/869435270/primary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1_keep_CWM.zip
The third file (MD5 Sum: ab1307c55a2c35c91d339c8037ce9a78) is meant to update a pre 1.4.1 Stock B&N ROM on primary /system through CWM, replacing recovery and all:
https://rapidshare.com/files/2059644016/primary_update_NC_stock_1_4_1.zip
None of these files will wipe user apps and data, so if you wish to do that, boot into recovery and wipe from there. [This will work on primary /data partition only]
Please note: If the B&N Stock ROM is rooted, you will lose root upon updating.
Thanks!
This worked beautifully! I flashed it from my sdcard after booting into CWM on my primary partition on emmc.
I'm betting you got the original from jasoraso in this dual boot thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=17122342&postcount=142
What I would love is a straight CWM-flashable 1.3 ROM, to include in my up-to-date (for now) guide for setting up the dual boot, rather than having to set up and move 1.2, then update to 1.3.
That is possible to do by combining three of the steps. You need commands from the scripts from the prepare dual boot zip to resize /media and create the secondary system and data partitions, then the part of the script from the file that copies the contents of /data from primary to secondary and replaces u-boot.bin , and then my file which formats secondary /system and puts 1.3.0 there, and copies the latest kernel and patched ramdisk onto /boot. I can put such a file together, but I wouldn't be able to test it. The Nook belongs to my wife, and and you get the rest of the drift.
PS - You can use my file as is after running prepare dual boot and copy stock to secondary. It is not necessary to update secondary to 1.2 before going to 1.3.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
rajendra82 said:
That is possible to do by combining three of the steps. You need commands from the scripts from the prepare dual boot zip to resize /media and create the secondary system and data partitions, then the part of the script from the file that copies the contents of /data from primary to secondary and replaces u-boot.bin , and then my file which formats secondary /system and puts 1.3.0 there, and copies the latest kernel and patched ramdisk onto /boot. I can put such a file together, but I wouldn't be able to test it. The Nook belongs to my wife, and and you get the rest of the drift.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait...what? What I'm talking about is a 1.3 zip made to work with CWM and in no way doctored to account for dual booting, just like the 1.2 zip one would otherwise use.
rajendra82 said:
PS - You can use my file as is after running prepare dual boot and copy stock to secondary. It is not necessary to update secondary to 1.2 before going to 1.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tested this theory? I found that when I did not register my B&N install while it was on the primary partition, I was unable to boot into it on the secondary partition.
Taosaur said:
Wait...what? What I'm talking about is a 1.3 zip made to work with CWM and in no way doctored to account for dual booting, just like the 1.2 zip one would otherwise use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about updating an already rooted 1.0/1.1/1.2 Nook Color. I am sure the scripting to do that is exactly the same as what is in the 1.2 zip file. Just replace the 1.2 files inside the zip with the equivalent files from the 1.3 update. Make sure the portions which install su and busybox are included, and build.prop spoofig is applied. I am not sure it is worth it building such a zip file though. One is better off just applying the B&N update, and then rerooting with manual nooter. What I created was for people that have already doctored the setup for dual booting. In such a case, the B&N update would either fail, or would replace the primary partition instead.
Taosaur said:
Have you tested this theory? I found that when I did not register my B&N install while it was on the primary partition, I was unable to boot into it on the secondary partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No way to get around having to register the primary partition image first. Once that is done it could be moved to secondary and then updated straight to 1.3 instead of going 1.2 first.
I have a dual boot eMMC NC. I am not sure which setup I use but the last time I updated the CM7 nightly, I lost the dual boot until I installed the u-Boot again. I suspect I have the setup that looks for altFImg. So this is not going to work for me. I have 1.2 rooted which I use only occasionally. I am not even sure what is in 1.3 but I am curious.
yelloguy said:
I have a dual boot eMMC NC. I am not sure which setup I use but the last time I updated the CM7 nightly, I lost the dual boot until I installed the u-Boot again. I suspect I have the setup that looks for altFImg. So this is not going to work for me. I have 1.2 rooted which I use only occasionally. I am not even sure what is in 1.3 but I am curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you need to do is boot into CM7, mount /boot as root, and then rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam, and then change the text inside u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to point to the new names instead of the old ones. This will keep you dual booting under the old u-boot.bin, and even after a new protocol u-boot.bin (like that installed by CM7) gets pushed to your Nook Color. Once you have done that, you can update the secondary to 1.3 using my zip file if you want.
rajendra82 said:
Are you talking about updating an already rooted 1.0/1.1/1.2 Nook Color. I am sure the scripting to do that is exactly the same as what is in the 1.2 zip file. Just replace the 1.2 files inside the zip with the equivalent files from the 1.3 update. Make sure the portions which install su and busybox are included, and build.prop spoofig is applied. I am not sure it is worth it building such a zip file though. One is better off just applying the B&N update, and then rerooting with manual nooter. What I created was for people that have already doctored the setup for dual booting. In such a case, the B&N update would either fail, or would replace the primary partition instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't know what to change and what to leave alone, myself, but I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. I'm talking about installing 1.3 using CWM, regardless of how the device is partitioned or what was on the primary partition previously. Like the files in this thread, but 1.3: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520.
I understand that you were just cleaning up jaso's update-dualboot-to-1.3 file. I used the original and it worked fine, but it would have saved me a couple steps (and would be more useful in a guide for setting up dualboot) to simply install 1.3 rather than 1.2 to the primary partition when setting up. The reason I started with 1.2 is because it is the most current stock ROM available for CWM. What I would like is to avoid a historical re-enactment of stock OS development altogether. A general-purpose, CWM-flashable 1.3 ROM would be broadly useful, but is so far lacking as far as I've seen.
1. Do you envision this to be an uprooted stock 1.3 update ROM (either as primary or the only boot option) ? I just don't see the need for this to be CWM flashable. It is very easy to get there by resetting the device to stock, and then updating the device to 1.3.0 using the B&N file, and restoring dual boot as need be. If one has any older stock ROM running on primary, the B&N update will get them to 1.3 while losing root. There is no need to apply 1.2 update first.
2. Do you envision this to be for already rooted single or primary booting 1.1/1.2 users? There is once again no need to create any file for this. One can simply apply the B&N update, and then rerun manual nooter, and restore dual booting to the secondary.
3. The only users with no clear upgrade path are those who have already moved the B&N ROM to secondary. That's why I fixed up the zip file, and shared it. I am glad the original file worked for you despite the script errors. I can see other setups where it would have failed though.
I am not trying to make this more complicated than it needs to be. The Nook Color is just capable of being set up in so many ways, there isn't simply going to be a single update method that will work in all scenarios.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'm envisioning it as a one step, starting-point-agnostic means of establishing a 1.3 stock install, whether for setting up a dualboot or for any other purpose. Its usefulness is made evident by the three-page thread devoted to CWM-flashable 1.2 images: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520
Taosaur said:
I'm envisioning it as a one step, starting-point-agnostic means of establishing a 1.3 stock install, whether for setting up a dualboot or for any other purpose. Its usefulness is made evident by the three-page thread devoted to CWM-flashable 1.2 images: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050520
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then the best bet is two step process:
1. Wipe device and restore to factory stock.
2. Download B&N 1.3 update file from website and place it on the root of SD card. Let the device recognize it, and apply it.
Once the 1.3 update gets applied, you are free to reroot, install CWM, set up dual booting, or whatever the next step may be.
It is the only method that will work in all circumstance as it involves starting from scratch regardless of setup. If want to preserve any of your current setup, no one step file will work for all circumstances. Some people have the stock firmware rooted, others do not. Some have the stock as the only internal boot, others have it as primary option of a dual booting configuration, while others have it as a secondary option. Some have stock recovery and run CWM off the sdcard when needed and want to update their recovery to the latest stock version, others want to keep the CWM recovery, and not update the recovery. There simply is no way file to cope with all these options.
rajendra82 said:
All you need to do is boot into CM7, mount /boot as root, and then rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam, and then change the text inside u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to point to the new names instead of the old ones. This will keep you dual booting under the old u-boot.bin, and even after a new protocol u-boot.bin (like that installed by CM7) gets pushed to your Nook Color. Once you have done that, you can update the secondary to 1.3 using my zip file if you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You lost me at mount
Seriously, I am trying to see if what I have is compatible with your update before I apply the update. I have a couple of useful apps on my CM7 and I have lost the password. I don't want to be stuck without CM7 or start over again. I can live without the 1.3 update though. So I want to make sure I am up to the task of finding and renaming these files if I have to.
With that said, how do I mount the /boot partition? I go into terminal emulator and give the su command. Then I tried mount /boot but that didn't work.
Thanks for your help.
rajendra82 said:
1. Wipe device and restore to factory stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...the only means of doing so "that will work in all circumstance" and in any way resembles a single step is flashing a stock zip via CWM. Why not use an up-to-date zip? The usefulness of such files is demonstrated by the fact that:
such files exist for past stock versions
those files are in use
files like yours are used to work around the non-existence of up-to-date stock zips
If you're so comfortable working with update files, you very likely could have produced such a file in less time than you've spent rationalizing away the clearly demonstrated need for them. Tell you what, in all likelihood I can just swap a few files from B&N's 1.3 zip into the existing CWM-flashable 1.2 zips, correct? Which files do I replace?
Anyone?
---------- Post added at 02:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:58 PM ----------
yelloguy said:
You lost me at mount
Seriously, I am trying to see if what I have is compatible with your update before I apply the update. I have a couple of useful apps on my CM7 and I have lost the password. I don't want to be stuck without CM7 or start over again. I can live without the 1.3 update though. So I want to make sure I am up to the task of finding and renaming these files if I have to.
With that said, how do I mount the /boot partition? I go into terminal emulator and give the su command. Then I tried mount /boot but that didn't work.
Thanks for your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know for sure, but wouldn't rajendra's update create properly-named boot files alongside the old, improperly named ones? Wouldn't the multiboot built in to recent CM7 builds then look for and boot from the more recent, properly named files? I can't confirm that's how it would work, but it's what I would expect.
Taosaur said:
I don't know for sure, but wouldn't rajendra's update create properly-named boot files alongside the old, improperly named ones? Wouldn't the multiboot built in to recent CM7 builds then look for and boot from the more recent, properly named files? I can't confirm that's how it would work, but it's what I would expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
The fix is simple: to rename the files. But I need to know how before I take the plunge.
yelloguy said:
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, but if you run a CM7 update, it would replace your uboot again. I'm not saying do it, just wondering out loud if it would work.
yelloguy said:
Yes they would create properly named boot files. But I suspect my nook looks for improperly named files since I updated my u-boot after the CM7 nightly update.
The fix is simple: to rename the files. But I need to know how before I take the plunge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In order to rename the files, you can do the following:
1. Boot into CM7 (or any other place where you have command line root access)
2. Create a temporary directory at a location where you have read write access.
3. Type su in a terminal session to gain root access and then mount mmcblk0p1 at the temporary location you created using the command:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 <full path to the directory you created>
4. Now use Astro to go over to the directory you created and mounted mmcblk0p1 into. You should see:
u-boot.bin which is the bootloader
u-boot.bin.stock which is the backup of the old stock bootloader
uImage and uRamdisk which are your primary kernel and ramdisk
uFImg and uFRam which are your secondary kernel and ramdisk (and whose names are mismatching the CM7 bootloader protocol)
u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram, which are text files per the old bootloader method containing names of uFImg and uFRam
5. Rename uFImg to uAltImg, uFRam to uAltRam. And edit the contents of u-boot.altimg and u-boot.altram to match the new file names.
6. Reboot as usual into primary or secondary.
Now if an CM7 update ever replaces your u-boot.bin, you will not lose dual boot, as you have it set up as uAltImg and uAltRam per the new protocol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
---------- Post added at 03:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:06 PM ----------
Taosaur said:
...the only means of doing so "that will work in all circumstance" and in any way resembles a single step is flashing a stock zip via CWM. Why not use an up-to-date zip? The usefulness of such files is demonstrated by the fact that:
such files exist for past stock versions
those files are in use
files like yours are used to work around the non-existence of up-to-date stock zips
If you're so comfortable working with update files, you very likely could have produced such a file in less time than you've spent rationalizing away the clearly demonstrated need for them. Tell you what, in all likelihood I can just swap a few files from B&N's 1.3 zip into the existing CWM-flashable 1.2 zips, correct? Which files do I replace?
Anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry if you think I am rationalizing, but that was not my intention. I just wanted to point out that the files you linked to do not meet your own criteria.
Take for example the file update-nc-stock-1.2-keepcwm-signed.zip that you point to as missing in an up to date 1.3 version. That file will update a Nook Color to 1.2, but will keep CWM recovery. It however will make someone whose Nook Color 1.1 was rooted using autonooter lose root. A person that has been dualbooting to CM7 on secondary will lose that ability as well after applying that update. So unlike what you think, this is not a file to update stock 1.2 update under all circumstances regardless of what the starting point is. It has a specific use (update fro, a pre 1.2 stock primary eMMC boot, no dualboot, CWM recovery installed). Creation of an all situation stock restore file is impossible IMO, and the best you can do is wipe and apply 1.3 B&N stock update. You or I could technically create another equivalent file with update-nc-stock-1.3-keepcwm.zip /system files, kernel, ramdisk, etc., but this file would be subject to the same side effects as the original.
---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------
Taosaur said:
Right, but if you run a CM7 update, it would replace your uboot again. I'm not saying do it, just wondering out loud if it would work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would work. If you apply my zip, there will be a uAltImg and uAltRam in /boot (in addition to uFImg and uFRam). If you apply another update that pushes the CM7 bootloader, it will then look for these files with trying to do an alternate boot, and would boot into a unrooted stock 1.3.
rajendra82 said:
In order to rename the files, you can do the following:
1. Boot into CM7 (or any other place where you have command line root access)
2. Create a temporary directory at a location where you have read write access.
3. Type su in a terminal session to gain root access and then mount mmcblk0 at the temporary location you created using the command:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0 <full path to the directory you created>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get an error:
mounting <paths> failed: Device or resource busy
Any ideas?
yelloguy said:
I get an error:
mounting <paths> failed: Device or resource busy
Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see a typo in my command (stupid Swiftkey X). It should be:
mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 <some directory>
Also try typing just mount in terminal to see if /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 is already mounted somewhere else.
rajendra82 said:
Take for example the file update-nc-stock-1.2-keepcwm-signed.zip that you point to as missing in an up to date 1.3 version. That file will update a Nook Color to 1.2, but will keep CWM recovery. It however will make someone whose Nook Color 1.1 was rooted using autonooter will lose root. A person that has been dualbooting to CM7 on secondary will lose that ability as well after applying that update. So unlike what you think, this is not a file to update stock 1.2 update under all circumstances regardless of what the starting point is. It has a specific use (update fro, a pre 1.2 stock primary eMMC boot, no dualboot, CWM recovery installed). Creation of an all situation stock restore file is impossible, and the best you can do is wipe and apply 1.3 B&N stock update. You or I could technically create another equivalent file with update-nc-stock-1.3-keepcwm.zip /system files, kernel, ramdisk, etc., but this file would be subject to the same side effects as the original.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Riiiiight... it would install stock 1.3 to the device. That's the intended behavior. The point is to avoid the unnecessary step of updating in any process that includes flashing stock to the sole or primary partition. One example of such a process would be a fresh dual boot setup. That it does not update or otherwise rely upon an existing install is the point.
Granted, such a file would not repartition the device, but it would install up-to-date stock in one step regardless of how a device is partitioned (1/5, 2/5, 5/1 or dual boot).
Hi folks,
Just wanting to understand Flash file behavior a little more, so several questions...
Question 1: Seeing that there are "SD" and "Internal EMMC" versions of flash files (recoveries, ROMs,etc), I'm wondering if they're specifically designed to write to SD or EMMC. Note, I didn't say "intended"... For example, if one were to flash a ZIP file, would it flash to its particular destination device no matter if I was booted from a Recovery located on SD or EMMC? Is it's destination "hard coded" into the ZIP? If so, does that mean it's impossible to accidentally flash a ZIP to EMMC if it was designed to go on SD, and vice versa?
Question 2 (well, question set #2): Do these flash files only add (or overwrite existing) files? If I created an extra (randomly named) file in a system partition and then flashed an entire ROM, would it erase the extra file?
TIA!
InUrKitchin said:
Hi folks,
Just wanting to understand Flash file behavior a little more, so several questions...
Question 1: Seeing that there are "SD" and "Internal EMMC" versions of flash files (recoveries, ROMs,etc), I'm wondering if they're specifically designed to write to SD or EMMC. Note, I didn't say "intended"... For example, if one were to flash a ZIP file, would it flash to its particular destination device no matter if I was booted from a Recovery located on SD or EMMC? Is it's destination "hard coded" into the ZIP? If so, does that mean it's impossible to accidentally flash a ZIP to EMMC if it was designed to go on SD, and vice versa?
Question 2 (well, question set #2): Do these flash files only add (or overwrite existing) files? If I created an extra (randomly named) file in a system partition and then flashed an entire ROM, would it erase the extra file?
TIA!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Answer 1: There are INT and SDC versions of the ROMs. The difference between them are different updater-scripts and vold.fstab files (you can get the SDC versions of the files from succulent's developer page on goo.im). If you flash any .zip file it won't do anything because recovery is reading for the ROM's files. ROM's without the SDC are flashing to the internal storage. Recovery can either be flashed on the internal or SD card. Either way, they do the same thing. So it is possible to flash the wrong .zip. If you flash an EMMC ROM and wanted the SD ROM it will flash to the EMMC.
Answer 2: Files do not automatically erase each other. If you upgrading from CM9 to CM10 you MUST wipe data/facotry reset, wipe cache, wipe dalvik cache. CM versions with different builds (ex. CM10.1 3/21/13 and CM10.1 5/21/13) don't need to be wiped because they are updates of the previous ROM. If you overwrite different versions problems will occur.
Let me see if I have this right.
Statement: Flashable ZIP files contain updater-scripts and vold.fstab files that determine where they will write to and (I'm assuming since you said 'scripts') other things that will occur during the flash. Accurate?
If the Statement is true about the scripts, then theoretically could the scripts in the ZIP flash wipe the data, cache, and dalvik cache automatically? Going down a slippery slope here, but taking this another step further (again if the scripts can do things like this) I assume there's a reason why they typically don't?
InUrKitchin said:
Let me see if I have this right.
Statement: Flashable ZIP files contain updater-scripts and vold.fstab files that determine where they will write to and (I'm assuming since you said 'scripts') other things that will occur during the flash. Accurate?
If the Statement is true about the scripts, then theoretically could the scripts in the ZIP flash wipe the data, cache, and dalvik cache automatically? Going down a slippery slope here, but taking this another step further (again if the scripts can do things like this) I assume there's a reason why they typically don't?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm far from an expert on knowing what the scripts do. I only know those two files change where the ROM will flash. I've tried making my own SDC versions of INT ROMs and have no luck. There may be something I'm missing, but I'm not sure.
When flashing newer builds of the same ROM you don't need to wipe data. I've never actually tried flashing a different ROM over another, I only know it's recommended to wipe data. Overwriting different ROMs is considered dirty flashing which can lead to a few problems with the ROM's behavior.
As I said before, I'm no expert. I learn from the things I've already done. Read up and learn about what you're trying to do and attempt it yourself. There's ways of recovering your Tablet if something wrong happens.
datallboy said:
...
Recovery can either be flashed on the internal or SD card. Either way, they do the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Emmc and SD Recovery are different versions and not interchangeable.
---------- Post added at 11:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 PM ----------
InUrKitchin said:
Let me see if I have this right.
Statement: Flashable ZIP files contain updater-scripts and vold.fstab files that determine where they will write to and (I'm assuming since you said 'scripts') other things that will occur during the flash. Accurate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updater-scripts contains the action script for the installation.
Vold.fstab is one of the ROM system files and controls the mounting of storage partitions.
You can open both of these files with a text-editor (e.g., Windows Notepad) and take a peak to see what they do.
See http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=37515697&postcount=31 for more info on what parts of the NT get changed in Rooting & in Flashing a custom ROM.
If the Statement is true about the scripts, then theoretically could the scripts in the ZIP flash wipe the data, cache, and dalvik cache automatically? Going down a slippery slope here, but taking this another step further (again if the scripts can do things like this) I assume there's a reason why they typically don't?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The scripts don't wipe these partitions because it's not always necessary to wipe them. /data needs to get wiped only when switching between different ROMs or updating to a new ROM build based on a new Android release.
That makes sense. Thank you.
I used Cm 13 sources to build a bootimage for my device and everything compiled without any serious error, but i got a very large boot image 8 megabytes. I tried flashing it via TWRP but it constantly gave me error saying bootimage too large for the device.
I also forced flash the bootimage that resulted into a bricked any help would be great
My device is Samsung vibrant
Now im currently compiling the entire rom
try
http://k.japko.eu/boot-img-manipulation.html
or
Okay, first off, let me tell you I'm not at all familiar with your device...so, instead of specifically answering your questions (which would be dangerous/irresponsible of me to have you do something for which I cannot be sure of or vouch since I don't have experience with your device), I'll try to give you some general information (it does seem like you have a good grasp of many of the concepts for getting where you want to go, so maybe I can just fill-in some gaps ).
1. Regarding renaming initlogo.rle to initlogo.rle.old: I'm not sure that doing that will change the splash screen or break something when it goes to look for the initlogo.rle file (a special image file). As you've probably researched, these files are a bit odd and are not just simple image files we're all used to dealing with. I've never successfully been able to create a new initlogo.rle file on my previous attempts a few years back.
2. When you re-pack a bootable image file (boot.img or recovery.img), you need:
- re-pack the updated ramdisk to a new ramdisk.gz file
- rebuild the .img file using mkbootimg utility, specifying the kernel file and the updated ramdisk.gz file
- it's might also be important / necessary to specify the base boot address using the --base <address> parameters when issuing the mkbootimg command where <address> is the base boot address of your device; your bootable image split/unpacking utility should tell you what it sees that the base address is; here is the information I saw when I unpacked the boot.img file that you supplied in your first post:
[email protected] ~/boot-img-split-tools/ameen
$ ../split_boot.pl boot.img
Page size: 2048 (0x00000800)
Kernel size: 9600396 (0x00927d8c)
Ramdisk size: 1313051 (0x0014091b)
Second size: 0 (0x00000000)
Board name:
Command line: 'console=ttyS0,115200 rw init=/init loglevel=5'
Base address: (0x40000000)
Writing boot/boot.img-kernel ... complete.
Writing boot/boot.img-ramdisk.cpio.gz ... complete.
Unpacking ramdisk... complete.
[email protected] ~/boot-img-split-tools/ameen
- not having properly set the base boot address might explain why your device didn't boot
- not properly re-packing the ramdisk might explain why your device didn't boot
- not properly rebuilding the bootable image (using the mkbootimg utility)
3. I kind of understand what you were trying to do by changing the the .md5 file...I'm guessing that you calculated a new MD5 sum of the new boot.img file thinking that would help CWM restore it; that probably doesn't matter unless you've got the MD5/checksum verification enabled; asking/using CWM to restore / install your boot.img is an interesting and non-traditional way of doing that
4. Is the CWM custom recovery specifically built for your device? I did a quick search for it and couldn't find anything. You do indeed need a custom recovery that is built specifically for your device and it's hardware & partition / filesystem layouts and sizes. Just want to make sure that you were aware of that...using the "wrong" custom recovery might be "problematic" (bad).
Edit: I think I might have found which one you used? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2189640
5. If you had previously booted into custom recovery on your "broken" device, you still should be able to re-flash or re-launch the custom recovery in the same way that you originally did, yes? The boot and recovery partitions should be separate--so, if you only messed with the boot partition, then you should be okay--unless you've got an incompatible custom recovery that overwrote important things (like your recovery partition...).
I hope that helps...I know I didn't touch on all of your questions...that's probably enough for this post and for what follow-up questions you might have .
Cheers!
source
http://androidforums.com/threads/help-with-boot-img.963358/
I dont have much knowledge about building bootimage but while i was compiling the bootimage i got an error saying no rule to make busybox flash image. So i just copied those file from kernel sources to the out directoru i dont know if that was the problem. Also i had tried using omni 6 sources a few days back i got the right bootimage size but none of my bootimages would bootup my device. Everytime id flash the omni bootimages i got a buggy twrp recovery(faded colors, unreadable text and bootloops. Also regarding the recovery you mentioned there were some dev that built omni lollipop for my device i used TWRP 2.8 to flash all the bootimages
I need help editing the default.prop of my rooted boot.img for an LG LM-X210ULM K8+. I want to mark ro.debuggable off as 1 instead of 0 but which i have no problem doing but when i use any kitchen program it puts it back together as 15mb instead of 32mb and when i flash it to my device it always bootloops.
If any one could help i would appreciate it. Im including a copy of the rooted boot.img freshly pulled ftom my device
The size probably isn't the issue. Using AIK the size was even bigger than the original.
It's all just 0x00 the rest of that partition...
By using my old uImage/_recovery unpack-repack batch file
http://cxzstuff.blogspot.com/2013/03/uimagerecovery-unpack-repack-batch-file.html
the result was smaller but still a bit bigger than the Magisk had made.
But that is irrelevant really... result attached.
Yea i dont get it. The size doesnt matter as long as it diesnt exceed the max amount of space the partition can hold. But why does changing one value cause the boot.img to boot loop after flashing.
Even the boot.img you made looped after flashing
Duhjoker said:
Even the boot.img you made looped after flashing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tells that it's not the tool used. Or mine oldie is as bad/good as the newer one in this case.
What that Magisk img had was like it had some signature but it should not be needed and probably just garbage left there from the stock...
Should not matter, but how about doing it other way around? Modify the stock boot first and then give it to Magisk for rooting.
I think it was stock. Ill have to make sure though. wonder why magisk doesnt make the image debuggable to begin with. But your right it might be that im using a magisk patched image. Ive got some firmware already broke down ill give it another try here in a bit and post my results.
Duhjoker said:
I think it was stock. Ill have to make sure though. wonder why magisk doesnt make the image debuggable to begin with. But your right it might be that im using a magisk patched image. Ive got some firmware already broke down ill give it another try here in a bit and post my results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So here we are. There should be some shortcut or something left to the original sub forum at least for a week or two when you boys move these threads - dammit...
Any luck? You have a customized recovery? How about these?
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...g/mod-bootimage-adb-unsecure-patcher-t3618558
Yes luck tonight i did a fresh reflashing on my QC Lg k8+ and decided to break open the boot.bin from the kdz i used and made my changes to default.prop then i put the renamed to boot.img on my phone and let magisk patch it then flashed it via fastboot and dared it to go into system. Then i double dared it. Then for safe measure i double dog dared it to boot into system to which it had no choice but to go along with the or be labled a @!%\**__(€.
It booted.
So the lesson learned is to patch a fresh boot.img with your default.prop changes then have magisk patch it for root.
Now oddly when i patched and tweaked my recovery using carlive kitchen, i also made sure that the same changes to default.prop or rather i made sure they had been made and they had. But any terminal like emulator or termux pulls up the props using getprop with the changes unmade and i still cannot change the values of the system build.prop and when i patch it manually it reverts on reboot.
I literally have to open a vi in twrp to make changes. And forget about copying my own patched build.prop to system in twrp. Because that leads to boot loop as well
Ok so is there a reason that you dont make those changes in the boot.img any more? Because the past two days i have woke up to no root. I have had to reflash my boot.img both times
Ok i just compiled my first kernel from lg source code and now i dont know which of the split images in my folder is the zimage
Back to the drawing board quite literally. Im stuck for sure.
I need to make edits to a few files like init.rc and init.lge.power.rc to allow for changes in my newly compiled kernels. Basically im adding a couple properties and some cpu frequency stuff. Plus i want to make it back to adoptable storage and add a second sd partition for ext4 projects im working that would work best right off the root file system.
Im using the stock extracted boot.img from a kdz using salt and carliv kitchen to unpack and repack i have also mkbootimg tools that i compiled myself and some static arm version.
I extracted the ramdisk place my new kernel image in and repack with the init files changed and flash using recovery or fastboot and bootloop every time. And magisk isnt signing with the verity key.
ok i dont know whst was going on the other day but i can split boot.img again and make changes with out looping.
i used gparted on my linux machine to partition my 128gb sd card with 3/4 vfat and 1/4 ext4 i know that by using adb it will automount but thats one timr and i may need to switch out every now and then plus it put a center part in it of about 15mb. with gparted i get the two parts with no bs. any way i created a script that mounts the second part and even symlinks some stuff. it works good but im having trouble getting init.rc to run it.
on early-init
chmod 0755 /system/etc/init/init.mntsd.sh
exec system system /system/bin/sh /system/etc/init.mntsd.sh
any tips