Hello all,
This might just be the noob-est question ever, but somebody please tell me what advantages does froyo have over eclair, and gingerbread will have over froyo..
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
bosslabs said:
Hello all,
This might just be the noob-est question ever, but somebody please tell me what advantages does froyo have over eclair, and gingerbread will have over froyo..
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eclair = 2.1 = shipped with all Galaxy S Vibrants and other Android devices (most of them). Good base system, pretty average I guess.
Froyo = 2.2 = obvious improvements + enhancements + Adobe Flash Player 10.1 + a bunch more features not seen in 2.1.
Gingerbread = 2.3 = obvious improvements and code enhancements. Runs on EXT4 (faster, more stable, and more efficient than RFS - default on 2.1/2.2)
Obviously, each new version has supple code enhancements which improve user experience, and other robust features not seen in previous installments.
Hey thanks for ur input bobbbb..sounds gud to me
bobbbb said:
Eclair = 2.1 = shipped with all Galaxy S Vibrants and other Android devices (most of them). Good base system, pretty average I guess.
Froyo = 2.2 = obvious improvements + enhancements + Adobe Flash Player 10.1 + a bunch more features not seen in 2.1.
Gingerbread = 2.3 = obvious improvements and code enhancements. Runs on EXT4 (faster, more stable, and more efficient than RFS - default on 2.1/2.2)
Obviously, each new version has supple code enhancements which improve user experience, and other robust features not seen in previous installments.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
adding on to the other guy, each new one is harder to get if you have a samsung device.
Are there any differences in how the camera, or the 3G, 4G, or any other functions in the way they work on these ROM versions?
Yes. They are different. For the most part they will be similar, but not completely alike.
Sent from my SGH-T959 (Samsung Vibrant)
Thanks bobbbb for this great explanation.
I only think that there are upgrading in system/kernel and only that
@ xriderx66
very well said.. absolutely true
xriderx66 said:
adding on to the other guy, each new one is harder to get if you have a samsung device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
drums please? XD It's so true... that it's not even funny anymore
xriderx66 said:
adding on to the other guy, each new one is harder to get if you have a samsung device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Samsung loves to hate us.
Mandown said:
+1 Samsung loves to hate us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.
Also though if you are using Chinese, Gingerbread seems to be more adept at managing it (ex: contacts in chinese).
ANd other features are improved such as mounting time.
mother f*- god damn it how old is this thread? I dont even remember typing that post.
STOP GRAVE DIGGING FOR GODS SAKE.
Related
If you woke up and found Samsung released gingerbread for vibrant and T-Mobile pushed it out to your phone, how would you use your phone differently?
Use GPS and Netflix doesn't count...
Just trying to figure out why people are up in arms again about updates.
Thanks to our all devs who have already brought 2.3 to us!!
Nothing different. I just want it.
When I got 2.2, felt the same as 2.1, except for the colorful icons in the settings menu.
I still wanted it though.
Gimmee gimmme 2.3 hurry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can see the memory management of 2.3 is better than 2.2, include Copy, Paste functions and status bar icon more beautyful... waiting for Ice cream
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Lets be clear, looking forward to an os update doesn't equate to dissatisfaction with the devs. It only means your looking forward to the update. And I wouldn't be surprised if some of the devs are anxious either. After all, an update means new source. New source means new roms, new kernels, new life to a phone that many considered to be dead. And if out weren't for the life support provided by the devs, it would surely be dead.
gingerbread optimizes the hummingbird cpu, which would make the overall vibrant experience better.
dttung80 said:
I can see the memory management of 2.3 is better than 2.2, include Copy, Paste functions and status bar icon more beautyful... waiting for Ice cream
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the best experience I had when I was running gingerbread. The memory management is really perfect unlike in froyo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I'd take the GPS libs and copy.them to CyanogenMod
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
I'd eat it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
I would make a sandwich, an ice cream sandwich.
Valid point though, is it ever enough? We were never guaranteed gingerbread and honestly i've run it and yes it is nicer than froyo but it is by no means worthy of throwing a fit or being pissy or grabbing pitch forks and torches over. Without devs our phone was a freaking embarrassment on 2.1 yes but 2.2 is smooth I dunno what is expected. We got jerked around pretty good last time. But it appears that they are stepping up with new phones. Unfortunately the vibrant may have to wait. It appears there is some change though we will see if it lasts. But seriously we gotta just see what happens no point in getting over pissed
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
mugenfiji0327 said:
Yeah does it ? I don't think so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't matter what you think
already running gingerbread, so for the most part i don't care. but i would probably flash some rounds of whatever roms come of it.
So if netflix works only on GB for Galaxy S phones, why OP excluded it as a valid reason to get GB update? Right now that is the only reason i want GB on my phone.
I'd enjoy the improved battery life, major bug fixes such as sms being sent to random recipient, better memory management and security hotfixes.
Dan_Brutal said:
I'd eat it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn you! Thats what I was gonna say
I guess honestly the one BIG thing I'd do is run around a show all my jealous friends and laugh at them since I had it and they don't. Officially that is
i'd make Ice Cream Sandwich with it.
I heard a rumor that Gingerbread will include the ext4 file system. Is it true?
Way better memory management and overall faster. Supposedly, it's coming this month.
ABC
ABCStore said:
Way better memory management and overall faster. Supposedly, it's coming this month.
ABC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your source?
stevec5375 said:
I heard a rumor that Gingerbread will include the ext4 file system. Is it true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you're talking about SGSII.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Ok,title says it all. Say it! Do you prefer Froyo or Gingerbread? Why? Tell me
are u going to make open gingimus? xD
ccdreadcc said:
are u going to make open gingimus? xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously
(i prefer Froyo,but when official GB is out,will update my rom because no one will still use froyo)
Performance obviously I prefer 2.3. Now I have void.forever and is awesome performance
But, because of is not an official Gingerbread, still having a little issues and bugs.
And in apperance, I prefer froyo. Menus and things were clearer, more intuitive.
Ciaox created this thread to check whether members are using his rom lol
Btw ; I tested ur rom, and within few hours I am back to Gingerbread !! I love gb with great performance and stable battery. What else do we need ? Bugs are born to happen
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
I am waiting GB only for an improved text editing.
Gingerbread has better performance than froyo and the awesome animation and looks of gingerbread is a plus.
I didn't I only wanted to know other people's choice
(that old poll thread was created to see how many dudes were using mine,admit )
ciaox said:
Obviously
(i prefer Froyo,but when official GB is out,will update my rom because no one will still use froyo)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree and i too prefer the same
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
i prefer cm7 2.3.4, stable, fast, and reliable
I prefer 2.2 becoz it hv less bugs den 2.3
ciaox said:
I didn't I only wanted to know other people's choice
(that old poll thread was created to see how many dudes were using mine,admit )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ! I thought you will add the result of this thread (like you did for old thread to know your rom is 3rd) to the FAQ of your rom
mansirawat said:
Oh ! I thought you will add the result of this thread (like you did for old thread to know your rom is 3rd) to the FAQ of your rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know about adding this to his FAQ but this must help him alot
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Somyab said:
I prefer 2.2 becoz it hv less bugs den 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate! You are getting GB even when its not released officialy. 2-3 bugs are acceptable.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Hey guys is there any gaming improvement frm froyo to gb?
Depands On the requrements like if i need battery backup then i will chose 2.2.2 and if performance or speed then sure cm7
I like performance, dont mind a little less battery life.
So its cm7 2.3.4 for me
My fav is GB 2.3 - great speed, faster 3D.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
mansirawat said:
Oh ! I thought you will add the result of this thread (like you did for old thread to know your rom is 3rd) to the FAQ of your rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm laughin' at that
opinion
I've seen GB has more goodies for the developer end like better OpenGL support and the like. For end users Froyo is no less awesome
I have always been confused by members who complain about the official SE firmware and the SE devs being completely incompetent and slow, when all of the custom ROMs have insufficiencies of their own and the devs are considered Gods. Especially, when our devs haven't brought us any of the major implementations themselves, like fully functional camera, 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch.
No offense to our devs, because they have limitations by bootloader, but the problem isn't just bootloader, it's having someone who can create all the drivers, which was the case before bypass.
What is important to you? Fully functional or speed? Which bugs are major? A little lag on timescape or rebooting, or a touchscreen that freezes or becomes partially unresponsive?
agentJBM said:
I have always been confused by members who complain about the official SE firmware and the SE devs being completely incompetent and slow, when all of the custom ROMs have insufficiencies of their own and the devs are considered Gods. Especially, when our devs haven't brought us any of the major implementations themselves, like fully functional camera, 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch.
No offense to our devs, because they have limitations by bootloader, but the problem isn't just bootloader, it's having someone who can create all the drivers, which was the case before bypass.
What is important to you? Fully functional or speed? Which bugs are major? A little lag on timescape or rebooting, or a touchscreen that freezes or becomes partially unresponsive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Repost in general discussion i think it would be more usefull there
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
Repost in general discussion i think it would be more usefull there
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a Question, dumby. How about an actual opinion rather than playing moderator?
Many people have questions about the differences between custom ROMs and official firmware.
What about fully functional AND fast? try wolfbreak's rom
Jokes aside, remember that SE gave up on x10 updates before going back on their decision and giving us gingerbread. And honestly, only the 2.3 custom roms don't have fully working cameras, Froyo is pretty much complete and has been my daily rom for many months now, i can't thank SE for that.
agentJBM said:
It's a Question, dumby. How about an actual opinion rather than playing moderator?
Many people have questions about the differences between custom ROMs and official firmware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay chill out a lot of things in general section are questions not trying to “play moderator“ more people look in general discussion anyways.Just tryin to help out
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
a.monteiro said:
What about fully functional AND fast? try wolfbreak's rom
Jokes aside, remember that SE gave up on x10 updates before going back on their decision and giving us gingerbread. And honestly, only the 2.3 custom roms don't have fully working cameras, Froyo is pretty much complete and has been my daily rom for many months now, i can't thank SE for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My confusion continues.....
There are ZERO 2.2+ ROMS that are fully functional. PERIOD.
Why do xda fanboys seem to think different?
If SE released a ROM that didn't have a fully functional camera, xda members would lose it.
agentJBM said:
My confusion continues.....
There are ZERO 2.2+ ROMS that are fully functional. PERIOD.
Why do xda fanboys seem to think different?
If SE released a ROM that didn't have a fully functional camera, xda members would lose it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2,2 roms dont have camera zoom ooooh big deal
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
2,2 roms dont have camera zoom ooooh big deal
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
agentJBM said:
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multitouch does
You can record audio on a lot of 2.2
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
rtblittlebrown said:
Multitouch does
You can record audio on a lot of 2.2
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, it is not fully functional or not working. You are the "perfect" example of xda dev "Immortality".
agentJBM said:
Correct flash, zoom, or audio recording.
Official firmware only has lag on certain stock apps like Timescape or Face Recognition. Oh big deal.
Is 60 fps cap, 16mil colors, or multitouch a big deal? Not Really. It doesn't make our phones more usefull.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what your going to say to me, your thinking I'm jumping down your throat etc but you've answered your own question there. Repair with seus then root and optimise with flashtool. That way your phone will be fully functional and fast with the benefits from JIT etc. Hope this helps out
Edit,
Why not try out ericks 2.1 rom which is extremely fast, like gingerbread speeds and literally everything works. Want teether then grab barnacle for free off the market. This rom has been my daily for perhaps a week or two at a guess but you won't be disappointed with broken features etc. Trust me really worth a shot trying it out
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The Gingerbread Man said:
I know what your going to say to me, your thinking I'm jumping down your throat etc but you've answered your own question there. Repair with seus then root and optimise with flashtool. That way your phone will be fully functional and fast with the benefits from JIT etc. Hope this helps out
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not, this is about the differences between firmware and custom ROMs. We already know the differences. I just wanted to know who is a bigger majority...fully functional vs custom ROMs.
If you or any other moron suggests that speed is the number one customer concern of software, you are STUPID.
agentJBM said:
Absolutely not, this is about the differences between firmware and custom ROMs. We already know the differences. I just wanted to know who is a bigger majority...fully functional vs custom ROMs.
If you or any other moron suggests that speed is the number one customer concern of software, you are STUPID.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here I say you can have both, full functionality and speed. I edited my previous post, check over that last bit I added. Oh btw really I'm not here to make arguments etc with you just purely to offer a little advice man. Peace, no need to call me stupid etc lol
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
A suggestion, if your trying to find majority between custom rom and official why not call your thread 'custom roms VS stock, votes please' or something
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The Gingerbread Man said:
Here I say you can have both, full functionality and speed. The I edited my previous post, check that last bit I added over. Oh btw really I'm not here to make arguments etc with you just purely to offer a little advice man. Peace, no need to call me stupid etc lol
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NAME ONE ROM THAT IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL, and a fast Custom ROM at same time. You are a liar.
The Gingerbread Man said:
A suggestion, if your trying to find majority between custom rom and official why not call your thread 'custom roms VS stock, votes please' or something
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not about the differences between versions. It's about camera vs load speed.
agentJBM said:
NAME ONE ROM THAT IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL, and a fast Custom ROM at same time. You are a liar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, check here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=941745 fully functional and possibly the fastest rom out there. Camera and video recording work 100% perfect. It's a custom rom, it all works, its fast and i wish you try it out before accusing me of being a liar.
Edit
My daily choose of rom for about 2 weeks, i left cm7 for this
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
The reason Erick's rom is so speedy is that many features(which most people do not use) are disabled. Once you add them on again, the speed is comparable to stock firmware. I would say that is the closest 'custom rom' to being fully functional.
All the 2.2+ roms, while very nice and speedy, often have things that don't work.. like camera, and all of them suffer from poor battery life. A big gripe for me is the wifi disconnect issue with all 2.2 and above custom roms. I find it hard to believe that most people would prefer speed over functionality.
I've tried most of the roms out there in my year with the x10, and I always found myself coming back to stock.
And now with the arc, I don't have a choice There are no custom roms for bootloader locked arcs
pngface said:
The reason Erick's rom is so speedy is that many features(which most people do not use) are disabled. Once you add them on again, the speed is comparable to stock firmware. I would say that is the closest 'custom rom' to being fully functional.
All the 2.2+ roms, while very nice and speedy, often have things that don't work.. like camera, and all of them suffer from poor battery life. A big gripe for me is the wifi disconnect issue with all 2.2 and above custom roms. I find it hard to believe that most people would prefer speed over functionality.
I've tried most of the roms out there in my year with the x10, and I always found myself coming back to stock.
And now with the arc, I don't have a choice There are no custom roms for bootloader locked arcs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno man, iv been running it in a few different versions over last couple of weeks and if you apply all extras like me id still say much faster than stock.
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
agentJBM said:
It's not about the differences between versions. It's about camera vs load speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see either camera or load speed in your title for this thread.
Sent from my X10x using XDA Premium App
THREAD RULES: We DO NOT ask for ETA or release dates in this thread!
So it seems like everybody goes crazy when it comes to the porting of CM7. But why?
I got my hands on a SGS2 with CM7 installed. Tried it, experienced it a little. From what I experienced the CM7 wasnt something that special. I asked the owner of the phone what he though of the ROM. To my surprise he said "it's just a ROM". He also mentioned that the stock ROM was smoother.
So now I'm wondering, why all the fuzz? What are you expecting from CM7? What makes it so special and so popular?
I'm pretty sure that a lot of people who craves for the porting of CM7 has no clue of this.
(off topic: tbh, i'd rather prefer MIUI.)
edit: for the interface
My sister's Backflip has CyanogenMod 7 installed with 2.3.3 (Not even Froyo is released in Asia-Pacific regions) , it allows her to have OC/UV kernels from 600Mhz to 748Mhz . Her phone is wayyyyy less laggier than stock .(the difference is obviously obvious)
I'm not really good on those areas but arent you able to do that using SetCPU?
QNBT said:
I'm not really good on those areas but arent you able to do that using SetCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he said using oc/uv.. his sister device only support 600mhz by default, but because she uses custom oc/uv kernel, she can achieve 748mhz with help of setcpu. it depends on clock stepping that were supported by kernel, not by setcpu. setcpu only help to configure those clock stepping
Oh, never knew about that. From my use of SGA 800mhz is doing alright.
And as I mentioned, not really good at those areas so I didnt even know that "oc/uv" was overclock and undervolt xD
Some bugs fixed are gonna be fixed in CM. Camera quality should be bit better. Theme engine is built into ROM, so there will be much more themes for SGA. Im also excited about haptic feedback (not sure about this one).
And much more...
What i wish most for, is fix for SoD...
downloadonlyaccount said:
What i wish most for, is fix for SoD...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends on your hardware
Sent from my Awesome Galaxy Ace S5830 with XDA App
I'm not really excited for cyanogenmod, but for MIUI. I want it so bad!
MiUi is cyanogen based, if I'm not wrong.
First off I'm sure in cm there will be accurate battery reporting. No ****ty jumps in percentage.
Second, if CM is under way I believe developers will include uv, through kernels or modules. Overclocking though, may not be necessary.
Other than that the rom has so many tweaks. Over time and development CM will make our original firmware outmoded because it WILL get smoother.
buchi89 said:
I'm not really excited for cyanogenmod, but for MIUI. I want it so bad!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same ;x but I would try CM too !
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Speed, stability, power, eyecandy, etc, etc.
But most of all; bugfixes and much more stability compared to stock firmware, as it is said that CM7 is build from the ground up so in my eyes it won't or even can't have the flaws that stock has.
Hey, it's only my opinion.
i think it`s only way to forget about SODs
Cyanogen is popular for a few reasons. It incoporates most worthwhile mods and runs normaly as well if not better than stock. Plus for me on a personal view it will help to get miui for sga.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
jusada said:
Cyanogen is popular for a few reasons. It incoporates most worthwhile mods and runs normaly as well if not better than stock. Plus for me on a personal view it will help to get miui for sga.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You gave me a reason to wait for CM7 (Y)
hahaha..if you want to know..CM is a special ROM I guess, more unlock option on kernel than stock ROM, so I can say CM is a very customizing ROM.
for a prove, u can use an app called Tasker, on that app u can get more customized settings if u using CM.
CMIIW. sorry bad english
Hello GUIse & Girls
As you can probably see in the subject bar (or title bar) in this thread, I was wondering what ROM's you guys are using. I think I've probably tested all the ROM's available for the SGSII (Since I'm a themer) and I can't come to the conclusion on which one is the best, they all have their strong points but some are better than others. I will eventually will put a Poll up when I can collate ALL the ROM's that are the main ones (No offence the ones I miss out).
I'll start,
I change ROM's almost daily (As I said, I'm a themer and need to test features) but at present I am using Revolution 2.6 with the Speedmod t27 Kernel, the battery isn't as good as expected, I've disabled fast dormancy and hardly use 3G Data or Wi-Fi and it seems just to drain like none of it's business. I'm even using the Black Android Theme I made for the SGSII as blacks work better and use 30% less power on the Super AMOLED plus.
So, which ROM are you using?
Cognition 1.5 with Beautiful Honeycomb
good work
edit: what? no cognition
ShiningAce said:
Cognition 1.5 with Beautiful Honeycomb
good work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't believe I missed Cognition out from the Poll, what was I thinking?!
And yes, Beautiful Honeycomb was our most diffcult of work to do, so much XML Modding it's unbelievable
Revolution from LeoMar
Nitroz said:
I can't believe I missed Cognition out from the Poll, what was I thinking?!
And yes, Beautiful Honeycomb was our most diffcult of work to do, so much XML Modding it's unbelievable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed. what were u thinking?!
ShiningAce said:
indeed. what were u thinking?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel bad now Can you edit Polls?
VR 2.4.2 atm, thinking of switching to CM.
TheSaw said:
VR 2.4.2 atm, thinking of switching to CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear after Build 31 it's very stable. Which is always good.
Nitroz said:
I feel bad now Can you edit Polls?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how to do that? newbie here
ShiningAce said:
how to do that? newbie here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was a question for me to edit it lol. I'll PM the Mods
lol. [email protected]#$
do edit it. its a good rom imo
Lite'ning ROM with rstopher's Red Theme.
I tries most of the rom. But for battery life and stability, in my opinion, the best is so far the stock one (KH3 for the moment). I just apply some tweaks^^ (CRT, APN, Talk2, UAchange in browser...)
Sakzaki said:
I tries most of the rom. But for battery life and stability, in my opinion, the best is so far the stock one (KH3 for the moment). I just apply some tweaks^^ (CRT, APN, Talk2, UAchange in browser...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usually stock is best as it's default with nothing added. You add whatever you want to it. Good really.
revolution from leomar
I recently got my SG S2, I replaced my beloved Xperia X10. This phone is a nice improvement, however I miss some stuff from the X10 like the led and the camera button
I just rooted my phone and I am lost in which ROM to install, My preferences are a stable full of gadgets and fast ROM
any suggestion?
ealax said:
I recently got my SG S2, I replaced my beloved Xperia X10. This phone is a nice improvement, however I miss some stuff from the X10 like the led and the camera button
I just rooted my phone and I am lost in which ROM to install, My preferences are a stable full of gadgets and fast ROM
any suggestion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd probably go with Revolution ROM, he included a ROM Kitchen app in it so you can install whatever tweaks and themes you need.
If you're looking for pure stability then it's Cognition.
Using DarkyRom KH3 with Supercore 1.6 kernel.
Great battery life, just the right amount of tweaks without over doing things and very stable
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
kersey said:
Using DarkyRom KH3 with Supercore 1.6 kernel.
Great battery life, just the right amount of tweaks without over doing things and very stable
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never used DarkyROM is it any good? Might consider flashing it
Nitroz said:
I've never used DarkyROM is it any good? Might consider flashing it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried many of the different roms but find the DarkyRom a keeper. It's very close to stock in looks and use but with a few tweaks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium