If the Nexus S and Vibrant have the same processor, why are the Quadrant scores for the NS higher then the Vibrant. I have the latest Voodoo applied with the most current Nero and the NS with TW's latest outscores my Vibrant by more than double. Is it 2.3? What am I missing? Thank you in advance for your responses.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Don't know since supposedly quadrant doesn't work well with gingerbread and both have ext4
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
3d benchmarks in quadrant don't work well on the NS and have to be disabled. With that said 3d scores are not included in the quadrant scores for the NS and they are still more than doubled on the NS.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I heard that gingerbread was made specifically for nexus s to improve its hummingbird processor, same as us, but we're no where near gingerbread
brnbock said:
If the Nexus S and Vibrant have the same processor, why are the Quadrant scores for the NS higher then the Vibrant. I have the latest Voodoo applied with the most current Nero and the NS with TW's latest outscores my Vibrant by more than double. Is it 2.3? What am I missing? Thank you in advance for your responses.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JIT compilier is optimized in 2.3 gingerbread fot he NS which is why the NS generally gets higher quadrant scores (esp in CPU score) stock compared to a stock vibrant. JIT is one major speed tweak feature when 2.2 froyo was first released but JIT was optimized for only snapdragon at the time. if you use quadrant advanced, you will see a detailed breakdown of the finale score.
source: extensively tested out my room mates nexus s before he returned it
I was under the impression JIT only affected Linpack scores and quadrant tested read/write speed, encoding/decoding of H.264, and graphics. Have I been misinformed?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
brnbock said:
I was under the impression JIT only affected Linpack scores and quadrant tested read/write speed, encoding/decoding of H.264, and graphics. Have I been misinformed?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also improves the CPU score
Related
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
What do you mean? How high are they overclocking the Nexus S?
Lots of Vibrants are oc'ed to 1400 with good stability.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
jRi0T68 said:
What do you mean? How high are they overclocking the Nexus S?
Lots of Vibrants are oc'ed to 1400 with good stability.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But all nexus s's are good to overclock
Unlike the vibrant I can't oc
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Have you tried Dragon 4? It was MUCH more stable for me.
Bionix-v1.2
Dragon kernel v4 Test4
Androdena theme
Yes The Team Whiskey-/ Dragon and some of the Eugene kernels can over clock very well I had one 1.45 The problem with o.c is the battery drain
But any of those do well in the over clocking world.
Alanrocks15 said:
But all nexus s's are good to overclock
Unlike the vibrant I can't oc
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure its not all the nexus s.. Some phones can handles better than others...ur just unlucky.get another one
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Alanrocks15 said:
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you touch yourself at night.. lmao I'm sorry I couldn't help it 8P
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
theebest said:
Because you touch yourself at night.. lmao I'm sorry I couldn't help it 8P
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha Family Guy
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
It could just mean that the developers of Nexus S put a higher voltage at the higher clock speed, which also means that it kills your phone faster.
You don't gain something from nothing. Oh and I am not talking about battery life....
dragon 3.6 overckolcked to 1.4 has battery almost as good as stock ! DoW doesent because it overclocks gpu at the same time and this is whats jams your phone when u run graphic benchmark.
bartek25 said:
dragon 3.6 overckolcked to 1.4 has battery almost as good as stock ! DoW doesent because it overclocks gpu at the same time and this is whats jams your phone when u run graphic benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooohhhh so can they not overclock the gpu?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
dragon kernel . get it
bartek25 said:
dragon kernel . get it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have but I can only run up to 1.28 not 1.4 I know I can run. 1.3 because the dow 1.3 old kernel ran flawless
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Alanrocks15 said:
Why?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A newer device with (in all likelihood...this is a guess based on decades of experience with CPU's) a newer revision stepping of the Hummingbird CPU. CPU/GPU manufacturers are ALWAYS fine tuning their designs, primarily for higher yields and better stability. This plays out predictably in the desktop x86 environment with concepts like speed-binning and overclocking in that arena, so it should come as no surprise that this plays out in other areas as well.
Newer board layout with design experience gleaned from manufacturing a few million Galaxy S devices? Reduced capacitance and resistance issues due to layout changes, altering of support components, changing trace lengths...etc, so on and so forth. All of these things can play out for significant and measurable improvements in stability. Manufacturers learn as they "do", the same as we do.
In other words, there are all sorts of easily plausible reasons why.
These sorts of things all have a significant effect in the desktop/laptop system world, so there is no reason to assume they wouldn't carry over to the smartphone universe.
Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
2.I'm using franco.kernel 16.1 and get scores like 900~1000, with stagefirght, jit and Hardware Acceleration enabled why still I can't pass 1000
Wolfexon said:
Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use a screenshot utility like ShootMe.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
If u want highscores use interactive data2sd and use any 2.3.4 rom
Thanks for the two answers
Helped me a lot
When i was in 2.2 i almost got 700~800 scores in Quadrant, now in 2.3.4, almost 1300. I think that´s normal because of the version.
I thing its wise if u using antutu...
Sent from my LG-P500
Yes, Antutu is more complete than Quadrant, and more detailed. You can get a comparative with things like Xoom, with Quadrant only with Nexus One 2.2 as the top.
sometimes my quadrant score 1350 with 2.2 froyo. sometimes 1000-1050 it is very interesting.
So I removed a lot of bloat, installed Da_g's OC kernel, OC'd to 1.89 (was my max stable). Ran some benchmarks. Here are my results:
Quadrant:3856
Linpack: 101.729
AnTuTu: 7600
Browsermark: 92446
What are you guys getting?
Thats roughly what I get with mine at 1.782GHz
...
just got mine...not rooted or flashed yet....so stock stock stock @ 2860ish. not bad out of the gate...
Clocked at 1400
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Rooted but didn't remove anything, not OC.
Quadrant: 3300
Here's mine
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
3999 on Quadrant.
Ballin quadrant score. I wanna see it hit like 4500 in the future if possible.
ookba said:
So I removed a lot of bloat, installed Da_g's OC kernel, OC'd to 1.89 (was my max stable). Ran some benchmarks. Here are my results:
Quadrant:3856
Linpack: 101.729
AnTuTu: 7600
Browsermark: 92446
What are you guys getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack shows inconsistent which is unstable
sent from AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note Dual Core 1.83 GHz
What about nenamark? I got 58.6 fps in that last night I think its hitting the 60 fps cap though.
why the hell would my quadrant score only 2456??? just got the bad boy
Not bad at 3840 much better than my old streak.
profclean2000 said:
Not bad at 3840 much better than my old streak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you rooted or anything???
Rooted and oc'd to 1.78.
I'm rooted but no other tweaks whatsoever. My Note runs very smooth.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA App
Just cleared 4000 Quadrant. 4039.
My question about what is slowing me down
Titanium is saying I only have 51 available in my system rom... How do I find out what is eating that up
My stock att no root.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
How are you guys getting 3k scores without OCing?
I've rooted my Note and uninstalled a buttload of bloatware and I still get right around ~2000 on Quadrant.
I don't get it.
Churphy said:
How are you guys getting 3k scores without OCing?
I've rooted my Note and uninstalled a buttload of bloatware and I still get right around ~2000 on Quadrant.
I don't get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure to clear memory with the tw task manager before running quadrant 2.0.
Sent from the Almighty Note!
K the score for stock gb is 1.6k and the score for the ics leak is 3.3k is that really how better ics is or its just quadrant is fails in ics and gives off the wrong score?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Similar thread, different tool, most likely similar types of results.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1565503
More like Quadrant fails in general.
Hello all!
I hope some of you like numbers as much as I do. I thought I should run my handset through a series of benchmarks in order to see just what the dev community has unlocked within this device.
Here we go:
Overclocked to 1.72 GHZ - Governor: Performance
Cubed Kernel 1.2.5
Genome ROM v2
BenchmarkPi:
Average of 5 - 337.4 ms
Best of 5 - 224 ms
Linpack:
Average of 5 - 463.059 MFLOPS
Best of 5 - 510.427 MFLOPS
ANTUTU:
Average of 5 - 18396
Best of 5 - 19270
Vellamo:
HTML5 -- 1737
Metal -- 636
Quadrant:
Average of 3 - 8131
Best of 3 - 8364
These results put the Droid DNA well ahead of pretty much all competition for the next few months. I imagine things will get even better once AOSP Roms make their way to this amazing device.
So - does anyone with a higher overclock have any stats? I would be interested in seeing how well this processor scales.
That quadrant seems low. I've gotten 8254 stock unrooted.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
sent from my beastly powered DNA using Tapatalk 2
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
getting there...
DSB and UKB's latest
System Tuner Pro to take it up a notch or two
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Ndaoud360 said:
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks usually don't turn on all the cores. At least that's what I think because I turn all my cores on and all on the performance governor and I get around the 9500's at 1.83Ghz.
I've received over 9k quadrant and 500+ linpack with 1.5ghz. Strangely, powersave gave me better scores than performance (stock kernel)
On cubed kernel 1.5ghz performance = 587
http://imgur.com/u4N5w
Whats the next step in mobile processing? How fast or powerful can they be?
iOSh8er said:
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23345 cpu! Holy fruck!
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I love this phone
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By the way, while my phone is stable on these settings it drains my battery too fast to be usable. I leave the cores set to 1890, but as long as I don't have the setting on "performance" I actually see decent battery life. My quadrant drops into the upper 9k's though without the governor set to performance.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are the chosen one my friend. No, but really... dayyuummmnnn!
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
tbukkos said:
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I could probably have a done a little more tweaking on the I/O score. The kernel used for this does support GPU OC, but I haven't found a tool that I feel comfortable using to OC the GPU yet. That and probably more realistically: I moved on to conquering other things once I managed the 10k score that was my goal.