[BENCH] Post your benchmark results here - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717

So I removed a lot of bloat, installed Da_g's OC kernel, OC'd to 1.89 (was my max stable). Ran some benchmarks. Here are my results:
Quadrant:3856
Linpack: 101.729
AnTuTu: 7600
Browsermark: 92446
What are you guys getting?

Thats roughly what I get with mine at 1.782GHz

...
just got mine...not rooted or flashed yet....so stock stock stock @ 2860ish. not bad out of the gate...

Clocked at 1400
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Rooted but didn't remove anything, not OC.
Quadrant: 3300

Here's mine
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

3999 on Quadrant.

Ballin quadrant score. I wanna see it hit like 4500 in the future if possible.

ookba said:
So I removed a lot of bloat, installed Da_g's OC kernel, OC'd to 1.89 (was my max stable). Ran some benchmarks. Here are my results:
Quadrant:3856
Linpack: 101.729
AnTuTu: 7600
Browsermark: 92446
What are you guys getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack shows inconsistent which is unstable
sent from AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note Dual Core 1.83 GHz

What about nenamark? I got 58.6 fps in that last night I think its hitting the 60 fps cap though.

why the hell would my quadrant score only 2456??? just got the bad boy

Not bad at 3840 much better than my old streak.

profclean2000 said:
Not bad at 3840 much better than my old streak.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you rooted or anything???

Rooted and oc'd to 1.78.

I'm rooted but no other tweaks whatsoever. My Note runs very smooth.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA App

Just cleared 4000 Quadrant. 4039.

My question about what is slowing me down
Titanium is saying I only have 51 available in my system rom... How do I find out what is eating that up

My stock att no root.
Sent from the Almighty Note!

How are you guys getting 3k scores without OCing?
I've rooted my Note and uninstalled a buttload of bloatware and I still get right around ~2000 on Quadrant.
I don't get it.

Churphy said:
How are you guys getting 3k scores without OCing?
I've rooted my Note and uninstalled a buttload of bloatware and I still get right around ~2000 on Quadrant.
I don't get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure to clear memory with the tw task manager before running quadrant 2.0.
Sent from the Almighty Note!

Related

[Q] Quadrant Questions

Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
2.I'm using franco.kernel 16.1 and get scores like 900~1000, with stagefirght, jit and Hardware Acceleration enabled why still I can't pass 1000
Wolfexon said:
Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use a screenshot utility like ShootMe.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
If u want highscores use interactive data2sd and use any 2.3.4 rom
Thanks for the two answers
Helped me a lot
When i was in 2.2 i almost got 700~800 scores in Quadrant, now in 2.3.4, almost 1300. I think that´s normal because of the version.
I thing its wise if u using antutu...
Sent from my LG-P500
Yes, Antutu is more complete than Quadrant, and more detailed. You can get a comparative with things like Xoom, with Quadrant only with Nexus One 2.2 as the top.
sometimes my quadrant score 1350 with 2.2 froyo. sometimes 1000-1050 it is very interesting.

[Q] Just flashed BCblend 2.6.35.14 Kernel with infected rom eternity 1.2.2

I flashed 1.2.2 rom first than I flashed bcblend kernel. Rebooted everything seems to work fine except I do a quadrant benchmark test and im getting low scores. When I go in set cpu and oc to 1.7 max .8 min i get high benchmark scores like I had with stock kernel. Anybody know whats happening? I unocked htcdev method. Hboot 1.5 with s-on
Are these low benchmark scores reflecting actual performance? If not, then don't care too much about it.
Are you using SetCPU, or a daemon?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
DDiaz007 said:
Are these low benchmark scores reflecting actual performance? If not, then don't care too much about it.
Are you using SetCPU, or a daemon?
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using setcpu. No performance is superfast...It's like my phone smoked crystal meth, no matter what I set the CPU speed to. Regardless I'm getting low bench scores. But I'm gonna take your advice and not care about it. I was just wondering if that was normal for a custom ROM and kernel combo.
Jabawockee said:
I'm using setcpu. No performance is superfast...It's like my phone smoked crystal meth, no matter what I set the CPU speed to. Regardless I'm getting low bench scores. But I'm gonna take your advice and not care about it. I was just wondering if that was normal for a custom ROM and kernel combo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try setting the min freq as the same as max. Then select the performance governor, and run a bench. See what that does.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
DDiaz007 said:
Try setting the min freq as the same as max. Then select the performance governor, and run a bench. See what that does.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I set it at 1.6 ghz min and max on demand. Then I ran the antutu bench test. My score barely passed the galaxy s2. Is that normal? Performance wise its real fast though so i dunno if I should be concerned???
Jabawockee said:
Performance wise its real fast though so i dunno if I should be concerned???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely no need for concern. Benchmark scores are terribly overrated. if the phone feels fast, then ride with it.

How many people are stable at 1.6ghz?

Hey, so just like the title says are you stable at 1.6ghz do a little test run quadrent on your phone and than if it passes your probably good but also try 10mins of angry birds just to make sure i on the other hands cannot run quadrent at 1.6ghz
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
K Rich said:
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Running stable at 1.6 also. Check this to run at 1.5.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1469710
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Andrew149 said:
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm stable at 1.5 (1350mV), though I don't run it at that daily. It was covered in steve's init thread in development. Look in the last few pages.
i run antutu all the time at 1.6 with no problems. guess i got lucky
Ok just gave my 1600mhz 50mv more and its stable now so i can finally overclock a little higher when needed
Stable only to [email protected] here. Locks up after that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Mine overclocks to 1.6 with no issues at all. I ran it like that for weeks until I decided that I want longer battery life. The stock speed is still fast, and underclocking still results in acceptable responsiveness.
I use Tasker to overclock my phone when playing certain intensive games. Otherwise, my phone is usually underclocked.
Mine's never crashed at 1.6, but I don't really stress test it there besides with benchmarks.
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Stable at 1.6 with custom kernels or tegrak on stock kernel. UV too.
SHOstock
Onepointsixingit
Mine is stable at 1.6ghz ✔
poofyhairguy said:
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow have you tried giving it more voltage.
Mine is stable at 1.6. Don't run it at that though regularly.
I've run 1.6 through quadrant and antutu many times. Never crashed.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I am very stable at 1.6
I have never had any issues at 1.6 and that is on just about every rom. I dont ever keep it at that cuz i dont enjoy sucking my battery but it is definitely fun to show off to others, HAHA! Also I have a captivate and the highest it would let me overclock it was 1.7 and that is ridiculous but it was unstable. lol
I've found a way to make almost every setting I have tried relatively stable. You just have to keep tweaking. It's not as simple as getting an overclock app and maxing. Here are some screen shots I took of a recent bench. This is only at 1632. I customized a I9100 ICS rom to be fully functional on my I777 and I'm scoring higher just above 1600 than I was closer to 1700. I was ranked 720 but those transformer primes! I wish it was only mobile phones on the chart! lol
Mine is stable at 1.6.......but im like everyone else. Don't like watching my battery drop like the ball at times square on new years eve lol .mine seems pretty happy at 1.4 with some under volting
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Geekbench Anyone?

Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2081 you got on 1.7ghz, running ics..
My name is Optimus Prime and I send this message..
irzero said:
Can someone with an overclocked S3 1.6ghz or 1.7ghz please run Geekbench?
I want to see the score vs the new A6 which just got featured and i cant run overclocked myself right now.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted some scores on Beyond3D:
Nebuchadnezzar said:
I'm getting 1854, 1574, 1292 respectively for 4, 3 and 2 cores. So the final score doesn't seem to scale that well with cores, which is obvious consindering there's single-core performance tests.
Here's the Exynos [email protected] 1Ghz with only 2 cores for a clock-for-clock comparison;
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032330/1030202
And here's @ stock 1.4Ghz with 4 cores, frequency locked:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/compare/1032351/1030202
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The A6 clearly and undisputedly has the upper hand here. The score may be lower but we're talking about vast IPC and frequency disparities here. The Cortex's are getting slaughtered in memory bandwidth.
And here's a 1704MHz bench for the hell for it: 2283 score.
Would be interesting if somebody with a Krait phone would run it at 1GHz and stock frequency respectively.
I hit 1800 at stock on Jelly bean Omega rom V26.
I might try and clock this phone and see what happens
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Wanam Lite Stock stock LI1 blows the iphone away, I get 1780.
NOTE: My S3 is not OC'd, this was at the default 1400mhz with stock kernel (3.0.31-111170 [email protected] #1
Tomatoes8 said:
Is Geekbench an accepted Benchmark? How accurate is it? The scores seem to be all over the place with the Nexus 7 with the crappy tegra 3 beating the GS3 in one test while the GS3 beating it in another. Don't really trust it if the results change on the fly like that. haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fade777 said:
What a junk benchmark.. kept running It till I got this.. my lowest was 1520..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any benchmark tool will be 'all over the place' depending on what is running in the background. Yes, you can turn off wireless, BT, data etc., but apps will still be launching and closing in the background which will affect the score. After all, these are supposed to be multitasking devices aren't they ?
Also, it's an inaccurate score if you actually go and forcibly disable system apps that would be running on a stock device, just to get a faster score.
Best way to use ANY benchmark tool is to get the device as near to stock as you can (consider a rom flash / data reset followed by very basic config) and then run the test a few times and take an average score. When I run benchmarks (Antutu, Quadrant, Geekbench), my results are often 'all over the place', so if I go with just one test, it would be luck of the draw really.
That said, my average score on S3 stock, rooted, unclocked in Geekbench 2.3.4 is 1586.
Funnily, when overclocked, the average was 1537
im on official (unofficial ) jellybean im updating to the latest leak now then i will come back with results that rape apple a6 cpu hard and in the arse
1830 at stock is my best so far without optimising anything other than a reboot.
The scores are higher on everything other than Memory Performance which is where Apple have beefed up the SoC.
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
eric-filth said:
How many points iphone5 do?
Enviado do meu GT-I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1601
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
This is my score... I use stock jb xxdli7...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
This benchmark tests a combination of single and multi-threaded tasks. So obviously it will be all over the place when comparing an A9 quad-core phone to an A15 or Krait dual core phone. The phones also run differently clocked/speed memory, so tasks which are memory intensive would give a higher score to phones with faster memory.
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
siyah kernel + setcpu(performance,deadline,1704MHz)
Lucmuzz said:
I'm running Siyah kernel on Omega v26.1 and consistently get scores between 2000 and 2100. Only over-clocked to 1600MHz though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My score was almost identical with 1.6ghz on Omega 26.1
xtechx said:
For what it's worth here:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032744
It was set at 1704mhz
Here is 1600mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032776
For gits and shiggles here is 1400mhz:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032818
To compare clock for clock I set to 1000mhz, but left at quad core...though not sure it that actually matters...
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1032862
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
familyguy59 said:
Gits and Shiggles! I like that one Gotta rember that!
Now to my answer: You just posted a useless thread and flamed about us members, now you want us to help you?
"How about you get a life?" Is what you said. Go ask someone else, or use the search engine by the same company that created Android "Google", ever heard of it? It's a really good site!
Let us know, what you have found..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the f*ck are you talking about, you absolute schizo! :what:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

Overclocked Benchmarks

Hello all!
I hope some of you like numbers as much as I do. I thought I should run my handset through a series of benchmarks in order to see just what the dev community has unlocked within this device.
Here we go:
Overclocked to 1.72 GHZ - Governor: Performance
Cubed Kernel 1.2.5
Genome ROM v2
BenchmarkPi:
Average of 5 - 337.4 ms
Best of 5 - 224 ms
Linpack:
Average of 5 - 463.059 MFLOPS
Best of 5 - 510.427 MFLOPS
ANTUTU:
Average of 5 - 18396
Best of 5 - 19270
Vellamo:
HTML5 -- 1737
Metal -- 636
Quadrant:
Average of 3 - 8131
Best of 3 - 8364
These results put the Droid DNA well ahead of pretty much all competition for the next few months. I imagine things will get even better once AOSP Roms make their way to this amazing device.
So - does anyone with a higher overclock have any stats? I would be interested in seeing how well this processor scales.
That quadrant seems low. I've gotten 8254 stock unrooted.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
sent from my beastly powered DNA using Tapatalk 2
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
getting there...
DSB and UKB's latest
System Tuner Pro to take it up a notch or two
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Ndaoud360 said:
How did you get 9608 I got 8660 on quadrant with 1.83 gh cubed latest
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks usually don't turn on all the cores. At least that's what I think because I turn all my cores on and all on the performance governor and I get around the 9500's at 1.83Ghz.
I've received over 9k quadrant and 500+ linpack with 1.5ghz. Strangely, powersave gave me better scores than performance (stock kernel)
On cubed kernel 1.5ghz performance = 587
http://imgur.com/u4N5w
Whats the next step in mobile processing? How fast or powerful can they be?
iOSh8er said:
DSB's Cubed v 1.2.5
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23345 cpu! Holy fruck!
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I love this phone
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By the way, while my phone is stable on these settings it drains my battery too fast to be usable. I leave the cores set to 1890, but as long as I don't have the setting on "performance" I actually see decent battery life. My quadrant drops into the upper 9k's though without the governor set to performance.
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are the chosen one my friend. No, but really... dayyuummmnnn!
neatojones said:
I managed to break the mystical 10k marker on quadrant.
I've been more of a lurker, until now.
Anyway, this is with cores set at 1890x4, performance governor setting. Running senseless ROM.
I'd like to thank everyone on XDA for their work on android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
tbukkos said:
Cheers for breaking 10k but why is your I/O score so low? (I've got 15k+ on the Note 2) Also was expecting the 3D score to be a lot higher on the DNA, kernel doesn't have support for GPU OC? IMO with those CPU / MEM and tweaking 11000-11500 should easily come
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. I could probably have a done a little more tweaking on the I/O score. The kernel used for this does support GPU OC, but I haven't found a tool that I feel comfortable using to OC the GPU yet. That and probably more realistically: I moved on to conquering other things once I managed the 10k score that was my goal.

Categories

Resources