Hey, so just like the title says are you stable at 1.6ghz do a little test run quadrent on your phone and than if it passes your probably good but also try 10mins of angry birds just to make sure i on the other hands cannot run quadrent at 1.6ghz
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
K Rich said:
No problems here, but every CPU is different. I've seen some people use 1.5ghz instead
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Running stable at 1.6 also. Check this to run at 1.5.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1469710
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
Andrew149 said:
yep thats right every cpu is different but how do you overclock to 1.5ghz instead?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm stable at 1.5 (1350mV), though I don't run it at that daily. It was covered in steve's init thread in development. Look in the last few pages.
i run antutu all the time at 1.6 with no problems. guess i got lucky
Ok just gave my 1600mhz 50mv more and its stable now so i can finally overclock a little higher when needed
Stable only to [email protected] here. Locks up after that.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Mine overclocks to 1.6 with no issues at all. I ran it like that for weeks until I decided that I want longer battery life. The stock speed is still fast, and underclocking still results in acceptable responsiveness.
I use Tasker to overclock my phone when playing certain intensive games. Otherwise, my phone is usually underclocked.
Mine's never crashed at 1.6, but I don't really stress test it there besides with benchmarks.
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Stable at 1.6 with custom kernels or tegrak on stock kernel. UV too.
SHOstock
Onepointsixingit
Mine is stable at 1.6ghz ✔
poofyhairguy said:
Mine locks up at 1.4Ghz. Each one is different i guess..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow have you tried giving it more voltage.
Mine is stable at 1.6. Don't run it at that though regularly.
I've run 1.6 through quadrant and antutu many times. Never crashed.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
I am very stable at 1.6
I have never had any issues at 1.6 and that is on just about every rom. I dont ever keep it at that cuz i dont enjoy sucking my battery but it is definitely fun to show off to others, HAHA! Also I have a captivate and the highest it would let me overclock it was 1.7 and that is ridiculous but it was unstable. lol
I've found a way to make almost every setting I have tried relatively stable. You just have to keep tweaking. It's not as simple as getting an overclock app and maxing. Here are some screen shots I took of a recent bench. This is only at 1632. I customized a I9100 ICS rom to be fully functional on my I777 and I'm scoring higher just above 1600 than I was closer to 1700. I was ranked 720 but those transformer primes! I wish it was only mobile phones on the chart! lol
Mine is stable at 1.6.......but im like everyone else. Don't like watching my battery drop like the ball at times square on new years eve lol .mine seems pretty happy at 1.4 with some under volting
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Related
I found this link to a working kernel hidden in the "Port Captivate Froyo" thread. It allows limited Overclocking up to 1.2 GHZ. Others (including myself) have applied this via Clockwork and it is working great. I by no means take any credit for this. Just trying to put the info out there.
http://www.mediafire.com/?byby91bhdm1b8l5 (Released 10/4/2010)
Credits:
(1) jt1134 for compiling the kernel.
(2) geeknik for posting downloadable link in port captivate thread.
(3) daswolven for being the guinea pig for the rest of us too scared to flash without confirmation.
Note:
jt1134 said, "Be aware its still experimental and issues may exist. Dont use the ondemand governor whatever you do, and be careful if using setcpu profiles."
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd at 1.2 GHZ
bendbowden said:
I found this link to a working kernel hidden in the "Port Captivate Froyo" thread. It allows limited Overclocking up to 1.2 GHZ. Others (including myself) have applied this via Clockwork and it is working great. I by no means take any credit for this. Just trying to put the info out there.
http://www.mediafire.com/?byby91bhdm1b8l5 (Released 10/4/2010)
Credits:
(1) jt1134 for compiling the kernel.
(2) geeknik for posting downloadable link in port captivate thread.
(3) daswolven for being the guinea pig for the rest of us too scared to flash without confirmation.
Note:
jt1134 said, "Be aware its still experimental and issues may exist. Dont use the ondemand governor whatever you do, and be careful if using setcpu profiles."
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd at 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What governor should I use? Interactive? Do I even need SetCPU? I don't want to change anything but the max clock speed if I don't. I find that it scales itself really well. Plus I don't wanna lose a lot of battery life.
GoogleAndroid said:
What governor should I use? Do I even need SetCPU? I don't want to change anything but the max clock speed if I don't. I find that it scales itself really well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use SetCPU. Min 200 Max 1200 Conservative. I believe Daswolven and others are using these same settings. You may have to clear cache for SetCPU if you already have it installed. jt said do not use ondemand. Performance also seems to be working fine.
bendbowden said:
I use SetCPU. Min 200 Max 1200 Conservative. I believe Daswolven and others are using these same settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I will then. Is there a noticeable speed difference? I'm copying now but I wanna hear from someone who's using it.
jt said leave on conservative for now and that he isn't 100% on profiles either done seem to be running them ok but that's what's been said
Sent from my Clockwork Fascinate using XDA App
GoogleAndroid said:
I guess I will then. Is there a noticeable speed difference? I'm copying now but I wanna hear from someone who's using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I loaded this kernel last night its pretty sweet. no issues runs really smooth so far. I have left it on conservative also, overall seems alot snappier. No battery issues yet, actually bout the same.
I have noticed a difference. Im getting slightly better Quadrant scores. My phone seems a bit snappier. Its definately a start.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Definitely a good start. How about heat? Increased temps?
bendbowden said:
I have noticed a difference. Im getting slightly better Quadrant scores. My phone seems a bit snappier. Its definately a start.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from around mid to upper 870's to between 910 to 950
GoogleAndroid said:
Definitely a good start. How about heat? Increased temps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None that I have noticed. Will report back.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
2609 on Quadrant :O
Everything sped up. I'm impressed.
WillisD said:
I went from around mid to upper 870's to between 910 to 950
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Last score 949.
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
GoogleAndroid said:
2609 on Quadrant :O
Everything sped up. I'm impressed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
bendbowden said:
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lag fix, and this kernel. The lag fix has made a noticeable difference in performance. Not on Quadrant, just doing anything. So I like to use it.
bendbowden said:
What? How?
Sent from my Fascinate
OC'd @ 1.2 GHZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
probably lag-fixed
Kudos and thumbs-up to JT1134!!!
The ONLY drawback I've seen to this kernel is a slightly accelerated battery drain. Still way better than when i was running stock with Lookout...
JT1134 and Dirrk are both working hard, and we're all gonna benefit!
Also, I've noticed that things tend to go more smoothly when SetCPU is not set to start at boot...
Haha I was one of the ones who flashed it right away too, d12183 on the irc too
I am running this with a min. 100 max. 1200 conservative, no profiles. No problems yet, and battery is actually not looking much different.
Benefit of conservative governor, steps up to use.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I loaded this and when Set CPU is set to conservative the Benchmark Test freezes in 3d Test
BakaUnchi said:
I loaded this and when Set CPU is set to conservative the Benchmark Test freezes in 3d Test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine does this as well.
it will not freeze as long as i have it set at 1000 or less for max.
Galaxy S Plus
This seems to use the same hardware as our Galaxy S phones, does this mean we can possibly hit 1.4Ghz?
Overclocking doesn't always help your phone, but heats up the battery and it is possible that battery to be exploded(well, thats 1.6)
There aren't even stable 1.3ghz out yet, so we would have to wait and see.
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
bobloblaw1 said:
We can get to 1.2GhZ already and it honestly doesn't make a difference in day to day usage except that your battery life will drop a good bit.
Can we get to 1.4? Maybe.
Is the hummingbird super finicky at anything over 1.2? Yep.
Could this be a slightly revised chip? Probably.
Is there much benefit?
Not really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ITs a different prossesor all together
GS+ = 1.4GHz Qualcomm MSM8255T chip
fascinate= Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 (ARM Cortex A8), 1 GHz
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
lambi1982 said:
Well then, thats out the window now isn't it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
There was an old 1.6 voodoo rom a million years ago. I ran 1.3 till froyo hit now im at 1.2
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
dalrym05 said:
I'm sure we will see more then 1.2 ghz. I module overclock mine to 1.3 with a 1.2 kernel. And never any issues. Every phone is different and I can't even tell a drop in battery. I get over 48 hours per charge with regular usage. Plus I think one of the devs are working on 1.1-1.6ghz kernels as we speak.......... its all about voltages clock speeds and the right phone. Alot is possible with the right combo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
nitsuj17 said:
disclaimer: i personally think overclocking on high end phones is pointless...see my rant on uncutandroid for that though
anyway the other sgs phones all have 1.4 ghz oc kernels...so the processor is capable of it certainly...the nexus has 1.5 kernels, but thats on a .35 and gingerbread
so its certainly possible that those who *need* to overclock that high will be happy when nem has had more than a week to spend with kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you on the reason that its pointless overclocking high end phones. I've had an Evo, Epic, Droid 2, Droid X, and now the Fascinate. Overclocking and quadrant scores are pointless to me because its already freaking fast enough.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Daswolven said:
Trade phones with me. Ill post shipping.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No thanks. I got lucky j guess. My other one isn't to bad itself.
What's up everyone?
Just wanting to see if people have been able to overclock past 1.8 successfully. And by that I mean no lag, reboots, and runs faster then 1.2 lol. I remember with the OG Evo that 1.19 was more or less the most you could get out of the phone. I can get to 1.8 on most overclocking kernels, just wondered if anyone got higher. I personally use net's kernel, silverneedle, and I must say it's rather nice.
And no, this isn't supposed to be an overclocking vs. not overclocking type of thread (sorry trolls :]). People are going to overclock because it's fun.
Bamba1260 said:
What's up everyone?
Just wanting to see if people have been able to overclock past 1.8 successfully. And by that I mean no lag, reboots, and runs faster then 1.2 lol. I remember with the OG Evo that 1.19 was more or less the most you could get out of the phone. I can get to 1.8 on most overclocking kernels, just wondered if anyone got higher. I personally use net's kernel, silverneedle, and I must say it's rather nice.
And no, this isn't supposed to be an overclocking vs. not overclocking type of thread (sorry trolls :]). People are going to overclock because it's fun.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've messed around some, I can get 1.83 stable for daily use. My phone will reboot 100% of the time using CF bench at that speed, but never with any other app.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
2050 here buzzing by
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
That's awesome! Rom/kernal, if I may?
havent tried more than 1.7, running 1.5 now, for what i use the phone for i have no need to go any higher really.
2k4mach said:
havent tried more than 1.7, running 1.5 now, for what i use the phone for i have no need to go any higher really.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, I run at 1.5 all day.
mine rebooted at 1.8 with rcmix
Bamba1260 said:
That's awesome! Rom/kernal, if I may?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Synergy,rcmix 2.0
Was on mag's rom with same
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
Could I get few people to post their scores? I wanna make sure im on par with a normal photon and I didn't **** something up LOL
Sent from my Unlocked Alien MoPho
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
slicedcheese said:
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After the first two runs, I can consistently get 2,750-2,800 on Quadrant Standard.
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My scores were just run as stock & unrooted. I reset my phone last weekend for a service call and Sprint is going to exchange it tomorrow for a new (and hopefully less buggy) Photon.
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
I got a 5400 without the loop trick with it well is 9000 high enough
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that ****Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?[/URL]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, never knew about that.
And my bootloader is unlocked, i am also on alien build #1.
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking about it just going to wait a little longer till my phone feels a little less new.
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
3496 running skinny with the 1.3 kernel I have been loving this rom, having great battery life as well
Just curious but what are your Guy's charging times? Like from anything under 5 percent to 100 percent. I am asking just because drain times vary but charge times should not.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I just got a 3 in linpack
Sent from my g1 using XDA App
lroy said:
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Well you have one option for cm7, lol
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
hjcg2001 said:
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You loose all blur stuff. If you ran or have used cm7 before, you'll want it again and again. It's snappy and smooth. My stock blur would fc on me but my photon w cm7 has not fc once yet.
For charge times, I was at 27% (after 3 days run time) and I got to 95% in less then an hour and a half.
This week I may flash the beta kernel for cm7 and retest but depends on work schedule. Still trying to get a good calculation of cm7 and battery run time. So far amazing!
Little better after flashing jokers v3 kernel for CM7. loving CM! I think my phone can go faster then I can type with my ugly thumbs.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Cm7 with jokers kernel.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Hey,
I have currently the CM9 and there you can overclock the CPU around.
How far can I safely overclock high sodas because everything is still stable?
Try it out!Every phone is different.
I can't even overclock to 768MHz
Sent from my Legend using xda app-developers app
filipathtc said:
Try it out!Every phone is different.
I can't even overclock to 768MHz
Sent from my Legend using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me neither...:crying:
786Mhz works fine for me ^^ Unless I plug in the car charger AND use GPS. Then it overheats and reboots
I usualy keep it at 787MHZ, but i`ve had it at 806MHz and even on 825MHz and i had no problems. Only...i don`t really see the reason why to overclock it so much. I`ve never had the need of it so far.
I have mine at 768MHz and I've only gotten a random reboot once or twice.
and strangely after flashing CM10 alpha I've gotten three reboots today at 768MHz... Maybe it was because of the different governor
I'll put it back to ondemand and see how it goes now.
My GF's Legend works flawlessly at 768Mhz under CM7.2, although she never uses GPS nor play games for a long time so I can't be sure it wouldn't heat up too much under heavy use.
lolamarcel said:
Hey,
I have currently the CM9 and there you can overclock the CPU around.
How far can I safely overclock high sodas because everything is still stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
787 should be fine