I just migrated my SuperD-ed G1 to Hero (SenseHero 1.6 at the moment) but I'm missing "Dev tools", is it incompatible? I really miss the cpu utilization bar on top of the screen!
if i google "dev tools" first hit is apple. that would be an explanation why it is not compatible, but could also be a hint that you need to be more specific...
sorry I thought it was obvious.. I'm
referring to the Android app that comes preinstalled with g1 roms to tweak a few settings like the one I mentioned. Also I don't understand why Spare Parts doesn't have swap and CC controls, and if I can use the standard market (google maps doesn't show up now).
Thanks in advance.
Sent from my HTC Hero using the XDA mobile application powered by Tapatalk
have you tried pushing that apk from your g1 rom to a hero rom? care to provide it here, so others can try?
there are different versions of spare parts available, i am sure you will find one that has swap and cc control. keep in mind that a) there were never as much devs on the hero as there were on the g1, and b) most of them are playing with their shiny n1's by now. so it might as well be a problem of the kernel not being tweaked as far as the g1's kernel...
kendong2 said:
have you tried pushing that apk from your g1 rom to a hero rom? care to provide it here, so others can try?
there are different versions of spare parts available, i am sure you will find one that has swap and cc control. keep in mind that a) there were never as much devs on the hero as there were on the g1, and b) most of them are playing with their shiny n1's by now. so it might as well be a problem of the kernel not being tweaked as far as the g1's kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried but it won't install in 1.5:
Code:
C:\Users\Poochie\Desktop\android-sdk-windows\tools>adb install ..\..\Hero\Development.apk
748 KB/s (83077 bytes in 0.108s)
pkg: /data/local/tmp/Development.apk
Failure [INSTALL_FAILED_OLDER_SDK]
Dev Tools is compatible to 2.1 only.
m0jo said:
Dev Tools is compatible to 2.1 only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it! Thanks
Hey guyz, you should look at this, f*** u se ¬¬
best reply from page 2 of the thread linked above:
kernelzilla said:
It's entirely far fetched, as OP is trying to correlate something that isn't the cause.
The only thing he's proven is someone typed make oldconfig or make menuconfig, there is usually no indication of source code changes in the .config, outside of new kernel config options that may be in the running kernel vs provided defconfig (did you even check? no). The fact that you didn't even mention looking at the actual kernel build timestamp in /proc/version tells me you don't really know what you're doing, it's not in the .config...
Are there any modules that exist on stock but aren't available for compilation from source? Are there any kernel modules that are exporting tainted symbols? (i.e. is /proc/sys/kernel/tainted 0?) That would rule out any use of proprietary or missing modules. Do any of the stock modules export newer versions or kmsg info that isn't in the source? I highly doubt you looked through the source this extensively.
Most production kernel development cycles I've been a part of involve a period of code freeze before the final release. Usually during this period only absolutely show-stopping bugs are fixed and things like debugging and factory/test hardware modules are removed. It is likely that this is what happens at SE.
Do you really think they put relatively untested code in the kernel during that 5 day period from source finalization and production build? Any changes, especially the security measure you speculate were put in, would require extensive testing. Judging by the contributions that SE has provided in AOSP, they test their software and hardware for compliance more than the average vendor. It's illogical to me to assume they've snuck some code in when they spend countless man-hours doing testing and QA.
This type of speculative witch-hunt makes the community look bad, not SE. You need to provide factual evidence of a license violation, not .config file changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
I am trying to build CM10 for semc ray.
But i keep running in to this error:
Code:
target thumb C++: libOmxVdec <= hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp
In file included from hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/omx_vdec.h:119:0,
from hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:29:
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/common/inc/extra_data_handler.h:51:0: warning: "DEBUG_PRINT_HIGH" redefined [enabled by default]
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/omx_vdec.h:80:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp: In function 'void mp4_fill_aspect_ratio_info(vdec_aspectratioinfo*, OMX_QCOM_EXTRADATA_FRAMEINFO*)':
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:294:28: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:322:32: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:324:32: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:328:12: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
make: *** [out/target/product/urushi/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libOmxVdec_intermediates/src/mp4_utils.o] Fout 1
make: *** Wachten op onvoltooide taken..
Something with the struct vdec_aspectratioinfo..
Anyone know how to fix?
Hey Thanks for Building CM10!!!! and im not a phone tech so i dont know how to code.. anyways gl!
as i examine it closer it looks like the thingy for playing mp4 videos..? or even video rec... idk about those thingys :l
hey you should team up with szl!! he has a working one that can boot
Fixed error
Sent from my Ray using xda app-developers app
lokenok said:
as i examine it closer it looks like the thingy for playing mp4 videos..? or even video rec... idk about those thingys :l
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh man I haven't laughed that hard in a while. Nice work
muppetmania said:
Oh man I haven't laughed that hard in a while. Nice work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol haha i didnt know what i was writing but now i do lol
and btw gl with cm10! you shud join szl..
lokenok said:
Lol haha i didnt know what i was writing but now i do lol
and btw gl with cm10! you shud join szl..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
muppetmania said:
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say it runs like $h!t, but it does have a few hand ups here and here. I'm probably just more tolerant because I came from a Nokia N8 haha
muppetmania said:
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yey! I'm not the only one that feels that way!
Well 'like ****' is indeed a bit exessive, but GB runs soo much smoother... I'm sticking with it as well for now
Okay, so I've been trying to port firefox os to the galaxy tab and have run into a problem. Take a look:
Code:
$ ./config.sh galaxy-tab-10.1
gpg: keyring `/home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/secring.gpg' created
gpg: keyring `/home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/pubring.gpg' created
gpg: /home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 920F5C65: public key "Repo Maintainer <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: key 338871A4: public key "Conley Owens <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 2
gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 1)
Get https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo/clone.bundle
Get git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
remote: Counting objects: 237, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (139/139), done.
remote: Total 237 (delta 145), reused 166 (delta 80)
Receiving objects: 100% (237/237), 30.29 KiB, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (145/145), done.
From git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
* [new branch] master -> origin/master
* [new branch] nightly -> origin/nightly
fatal: manifest 'galaxy-tab-10.1.xml' not available
fatal: manifest galaxy-tab-10.1.xml not found
Repo sync failed
I think this occurring because it is trying to find "galaxy-tab-10.1" in git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest when there is no such file or directory with that name in the repository. Any help or thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated, and if this port is successful, I will make sure to post back the results.
I know this isn't helping..but I was wondering, isn't firefox os only for phones?
I didn't know that there was a tablet version..
Please let me know..
Either way, hope it progresses well!
Just saw a tweet from XDA they added a Firefox OS section, might be able to find your answer there
sw6lee said:
I know this isn't helping..but I was wondering, isn't firefox os only for phones?
I didn't know that there was a tablet version..
Please let me know..
Either way, hope it progresses well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I haven't really heard a lot about people using it on their tablets... but worst case scenario, I'll just have to adjust the dpi or a few minor things.
There is no reason I can think of why this wouldn't work.
nakedninja42 said:
Just saw a tweet from XDA they added a Firefox OS section, might be able to find your answer there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a thread over there a little bit ago. Hopefully I'll hear back soon; I really want to find out what went wrong so I can get back to building this thing. :fingers-crossed:
Kobalt.Kitsune said:
Well, I haven't really heard a lot about people using it on their tablets... but worst case scenario, I'll just have to adjust the dpi or a few minor things.
There is no reason I can think of why this wouldn't work.
I posted a thread over there a little bit ago. Hopefully I'll hear back soon; I really want to find out what went wrong so I can get back to building this thing. :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish I could contribute more to help out, it would be cool to see Firefox and Ubuntu ported. Best of luck!
Well I figured it out... It was indeed a problem with my manifest.xml file. Anyway, I'm glad I decided to spend the week building this. I've already learned so much about how to use git, c++, and a bunch of other invaluable skills from this little project.
Getting back on topic, this first build (if it works) will only be for us gt-p7510 users. After that, I will start work on the other galaxy tab models.
Cross your fingers. :fingers-crossed:
That's great news! Can't wait to check it out. :victory:
Great initiative, very curious how far you will get with this!
Awesome, if you need testers I will sign myself up for testing as my tab isnt doing anything at the moment.
I too would be happy to test for us. :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I747 using xda premium
Hi, this is interesting work, I'll be your next tester if you like... :good:
Also take a look at ReactOS project that has been developed for both ARM and x86, I'm struggling to run it on my tab(P7500)...
It has never been a problem to run P7510 ROMs on P7500, so don't be afraid to test all the things you get for the TABs
Thanks again for trying to bring new life(new OS I mean) in the SGT forums...
So I've been troubleshooting all morning with modifying our device tree + OmniROM source to be able to attempt a jflteatt build of the new ROM, and I finally have my build compiling as I write this.
However, based on the trouble I've had getting the grouper (N7) build to boot - it compiled just fine - I'm doubting that I'll be able to get our device's build booted on the first try either (assuming this build finishes without error).
As such, I wanted to reach out to you guys to see if anyone else is currently working on building this ROM - and hopefully create a place where we can share tips or troubleshoot for our specific devices.
I apologize if this is the wrong forum to post this in, but I figured if I posted this in any of the main forums it would get flooded with "plz build for Sprint S4" or "ETA plz?" posts....lol.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2483622
Grarak might be able to help...
DSA said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2483622
Grarak might be able to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks....I saw that thread, but figured that the chipsets are different enough that it wouldn't be of that much use. Am I off-base there?
CPA Poke said:
Thanks....I saw that thread, but figured that the chipsets are different enough that it wouldn't be of that much use. Am I off-base there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no your in the right forum, and yes your also right that that omnirom thread, while semi useful, isnt the best since our processors are different and what works for them might not work for us. Looking forward to watching this develop though,
Do you mean porting from source?
CNexus said:
Do you mean porting from source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. I guess "port" probably wasn't the best verbiage...more precisely, adding our device tree to the OmniROM source
There's a write up on xda-university on porting from source. Might wanna take a look at it
I'm not sure what the point of this thread is though. No point discussing it if you haven't even tried it/reached a compile/runtime error
CNexus said:
There's a write up on xda-university on porting from source. Might wanna take a look at it
I'm not sure what the point of this thread is though. No point discussing it if you haven't even tried it/reached a compile/runtime error
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That guide was my main starting point with all of this, actually...however I'm thinking that it was written by someone who's first language is something other than English, as I always end up getting lost midway through because I literally can't figure out what he/she is trying to say.
And I've been at work all day but managed to remote in to my home PC a couple times - both times discovering that the build had failed, and both times attempting to troubleshoot each error. I was planning on posting the error and my roomservice.xml (as I suspect it's probably where I'm going wrong), so I'll post them shortly.
CPA Poke said:
That guide was my main starting point with all of this, actually...however I'm thinking that it was written by someone who's first language is something other than English, as I always end up getting lost midway through because I literally can't figure out what he/she is trying to say.
And I've been at work all day but managed to remote in to my home PC a couple times - both times discovering that the build had failed, and both times attempting to troubleshoot each error. I was planning on posting the error and my roomservice.xml (as I suspect it's probably where I'm going wrong), so I'll post them shortly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know your circumstances, but I was able to understand the guide perfectly and my first language is english.
It might be better if you take to the OmniROM irc chat (#omni for dev chat) and say you're trying to add support for your device and just list the error you're getting.
CNexus said:
I don't know your circumstances, but I was able to understand the guide perfectly and my first language is english.
It might be better if you take to the OmniROM irc chat (#omni for dev chat) and say you're trying to add support for your device and just list the error you're getting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
've been working on it with all the necessary file (so i think). One of my team mates help me out with jf tree but havn' had any successful build yet. usually get an error when its close to being finish so have to troubleshoot one fail build at a time
I dont know why you need to run of to the omini irc and abandon this one...i believe in team work. the IRC is a lot of help they help me t roubleshoot my way through...at the same time will be nice to have a discussion among individuals who actually uses our device. the people i've met in the irc do not use gs4 or any form of it from what i saw
CPA Poke said:
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your discussion is welcome here. I completely understand your dilemma. But if you are having issues it might be beneficial to post the specific issue you're having instead of trying to promote discussion in this thread. Im sure if you asked someone they would explain how they got to the solution of the problem.
Sent from my XT912 using xda app-developers app
CPA Poke said:
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand, I've been through the exact same thing (and am still usually unable to find help on things like source building and kernels). I was not trying to discredit your post, just
And by "circumstances" I meant whatever language/languages you know, or background you come from, etc etc that lead you to have trouble understanding the xda-university write-up.
No offense was intended, but it does help to fix errors when you post the error you're getting lol.
Surge1223 said:
Your discussion is welcome here. I completely understand your dilemma. But if you are having issues it might be beneficial to post the specific issue you're having instead of trying to promote discussion in this thread. Im sure if you asked someone they would explain how they got to the solution of the problem.
Sent from my XT912 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CNexus said:
I understand, I've been through the exact same thing (and am still usually unable to find help on things like source building and kernels). I was not trying to discredit your post, just
And by "circumstances" I meant whatever language/languages you know, or background you come from, etc etc that lead you to have trouble understanding the xda-university write-up.
No offense was intended, but it does help to fix errors when you post the error you're getting lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely agreed. Honestly I was trying to be as non-noob as possible and wanted to try and work through as many of the errors related to syntax, etc on my own, saving the real discussion for the thread.
I'm going to take a look at this for jfltespr this weekend. I'll start adding my notes here as well.
garwynn said:
I'm going to take a look at this for jfltespr this weekend. I'll start adding my notes here as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been working on JFLTEATT for a bit, very, very frustrating since CM's selinux and AOSP selinux are very different. causing a LOT of build issues.
take a look at my github, you'll be able to fork my
android_kernel_samsung_jf
android_device_samsung_jf-common
device trees
https://github.com/jakew02
hopefully this gives you a head-start.
I should have a build up for jflteatt within the next few hours , by tonight im hoping.
Update So, i got a booting build. just needs to be fine-tuned to actually work!
jakew02 said:
I've been working on JFLTEATT for a bit, very, very frustrating since CM's selinux and AOSP selinux are very different. causing a LOT of build issues.
take a look at my github, you'll be able to fork my
android_kernel_samsung_jf
android_device_samsung_jf-common
device trees
https://github.com/jakew02
hopefully this gives you a head-start.
I should have a build up for jflteatt within the next few hours , by tonight im hoping.
Update So, i got a booting build. just needs to be fine-tuned to actually work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
CPA Poke said:
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bluetooth should be fixed now
https://github.com/omnirom/android_...mmit/62d71414709f0f6282b8d108cc66716f37872f96
btw remove selinux union
then it should build correct
Grarak said:
bluetooth should be fixed now
https://github.com/omnirom/android_...mmit/62d71414709f0f6282b8d108cc66716f37872f96
btw remove selinux union
then it should build correct
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MONEY, thanks my friend.
CPA Poke said:
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it boots up.. Shows the boot animation, the capacitative buttons light up and vibrate on touch, but the screen stays black and it eventually force reboots. i originally used CyanogenMod trees but decided to rebase to these device trees.https://github.com/AOSP-S4, but running into errors again.
I PM'd task and he said that he already has it up and running and there's no need to port,, just sync add device trees and build.. but when i did that i ran into about a million build failures that i had to manually fix, hence the github
Update: so based on what task said, I'm going to try just creating my own device tree, basing off of cyanogenmod's very first commit for jflteatt , jf-common , and kernel_samsung_jf. here goes nothing
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk