Hi
I am trying to build CM10 for semc ray.
But i keep running in to this error:
Code:
target thumb C++: libOmxVdec <= hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp
In file included from hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/omx_vdec.h:119:0,
from hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:29:
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/common/inc/extra_data_handler.h:51:0: warning: "DEBUG_PRINT_HIGH" redefined [enabled by default]
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/omx_vdec.h:80:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp: In function 'void mp4_fill_aspect_ratio_info(vdec_aspectratioinfo*, OMX_QCOM_EXTRADATA_FRAMEINFO*)':
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:294:28: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:322:32: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:324:32: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/src/mp4_utils.cpp:328:12: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
hardware/qcom/media/mm-video/vidc/vdec/inc/mp4_utils.h:150:40: error: forward declaration of 'struct vdec_aspectratioinfo'
make: *** [out/target/product/urushi/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libOmxVdec_intermediates/src/mp4_utils.o] Fout 1
make: *** Wachten op onvoltooide taken..
Something with the struct vdec_aspectratioinfo..
Anyone know how to fix?
Hey Thanks for Building CM10!!!! and im not a phone tech so i dont know how to code.. anyways gl!
as i examine it closer it looks like the thingy for playing mp4 videos..? or even video rec... idk about those thingys :l
hey you should team up with szl!! he has a working one that can boot
Fixed error
Sent from my Ray using xda app-developers app
lokenok said:
as i examine it closer it looks like the thingy for playing mp4 videos..? or even video rec... idk about those thingys :l
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh man I haven't laughed that hard in a while. Nice work
muppetmania said:
Oh man I haven't laughed that hard in a while. Nice work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol haha i didnt know what i was writing but now i do lol
and btw gl with cm10! you shud join szl..
lokenok said:
Lol haha i didnt know what i was writing but now i do lol
and btw gl with cm10! you shud join szl..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
muppetmania said:
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say it runs like $h!t, but it does have a few hand ups here and here. I'm probably just more tolerant because I came from a Nokia N8 haha
muppetmania said:
I'm sticking with GB. There's no major features in either ICS or JB that I care about. And as much as the kiddies tell themselves that ICS is "Smooth as Butter" on their phones, it "Runs like ****" on my phone, despite the hard & excellent work the CM Team and FXP do.
Maybe that'll change with JB, but I have my doubts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yey! I'm not the only one that feels that way!
Well 'like ****' is indeed a bit exessive, but GB runs soo much smoother... I'm sticking with it as well for now
Related
a port of aChef to C#.
well... I decided to make a port of aChef today to C# and I've done it... the speed improvement (especially when re-building the OS.nb) is superb so I figured it's definitely worth releasing; credit of course goes to Ahlok_hk of course for creating the Java applet in the first place.
other than the speed... there is no real benefit to using this over the original aChef... it does not do anything special or new, although over the weekend I will be porting this code into my ROM Kitchen pending a complete re-hash of the design and layout
Special Note:
at the request of ahlok_hk, he has asked that I not release it... therefore I have encrypted the zip folder; if you wish to use this then feel free to contact me for the file password, but please only do so if you intend to use this for internal developmental purposes.
the Java version of this application will more than suffice for general ROM Cooking.
Revised Version
New version noticeably faster; array conversions from unsigned to signed are gone... application is now much faster! (AND IT ACTUALLY WORKS!)
fixed, and released.
as an additional point; should ahlok_hk ever decide to release his source code, I will also release the source to this.
hi there... an other rom cooking kitchen is released.... "romkoch" ....
futureshock said:
hi there... an other rom cooking kitchen is released.... "romkoch" ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know... I was testing it.
So, why would ahlok_hk be opposed to this release? Just curious...
Me too, especially that you can disassemble it so easily if you really wanna get the internals.
richy240 said:
So, why would ahlok_hk be opposed to this release? Just curious...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is a clone copy of aChef and it is release without my prior agreement.
Totally not necessary as he could just put the code into his kitchen but not to release just another aChef.
ahlok_hk said:
Because this is a clone copy of aChef and it is release without my prior agreement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said, I passworded it, and nobody's asked me for the password yet
I've created it for the common good, I have no interest in credit whatsoever, so if you'd like me to attribute it soley to you, I'd be more than happy to; the purpose is to collaborate and work together to improve efficiency, but of course I do respect your wishes whatever they might be... I just hope that maybe you'll see that this is a good, not bad thing
piopawlu said:
Me too, especially that you can disassemble it so easily if you really wanna get the internals.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could steal something when no one see you. But it doesn't mean you should do that.
Olipro said:
As I said, I passworded it, and nobody's asked me for the password yet
I've created it for the common good, I have no interest in credit whatsoever, so if you'd like me to attribute it soley to you, I'd be more than happy to; the purpose is to collaborate and work together to improve efficiency, but of course I do respect your wishes whatever they might be... I just hope that maybe you'll see that this is a good, not bad thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I undestand your point. Anyway thx for password protect it.
ahlok_hk said:
piopawlu said:
Me too, especially that you can disassemble it so easily if you really wanna get the internals.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could steal something when no one see you. But it doesn't mean you should do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't it pretty much what reverse engineering is about? I am not saying it's good, but in some way this is what is being done all over here.
Personally I would like to have such a tool written in pure C, so that I don't have to download 20MB or more JVM even though it might seem more portable now.
piopawlu said:
Personally I would like to have such a tool written in pure C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do it yourself: this "tool" would be about several tens of code strings. Theory behind it described here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=1143517#post1143517 .
...more portable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pure C is more portable than java
Finally fixed the tool in its entirety; you know it was a single typo that has kept me going for ages wondering what the hell was wrong with it... either way, new version will be uploaded shortly.
ahlok_hk said:
You could steal something when no one see you. But it doesn't mean you should do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is very true... but if you did that, they would no longer have what you stole you would have it and they wouldn't... clearly this is not the case with software.
Des said:
pure C is more portable than java
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I said "it might seem more portable now" Anyway, right now I see no point rewriting this as I got JDK/JRE installed for other purposes. No more about it cuz this's going a bit off the topic.
ahlok_hk said:
You could steal something when no one see you. But it doesn't mean you should do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have decompiled your software. It does not work (!) for the
athena image, because of looking at +0x208 for the MSFLSH50 magic
instead of +0x200. Is this behaviour intentional ?
piopawlu said:
Anyway, right now I see no point rewriting this as I got JDK/JRE installed for other purposes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This program should be rewritten in C and released with the source code, so everybody will benefit from a working program.
Guys, i'm really surprised by the childish things like zipping
with password and not releasing the source freely
I don't know what the hell you're talking about; it's an unprotected JAR file; port it, or learn to know what's going on
cr2 said:
I have decompiled your software. It does not work (!) for the
athena image, because of looking at +0x208 for the MSFLSH50 magic
instead of +0x200. Is this behaviour intentional ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the tool you're talking about is specific to the Hermes format (which has 8 additional bytes every 512 bytes).
Have a look at the ImgfsTools (originally by mamaich, enhanced version by me) available here. They should do all aChef/aWaiter can do (as far as I understood aChef), but are not specific to Hermes images.
Oh, and the source code for these tools is available from me, just ask if you want it.
Cheers
Daniel
tadzio said:
Have a look at the ImgfsTools (originally by mamaich, enhanced version by me) available here. They should do all aChef/aWaiter can do (as far as I understood aChef), but are not specific to Hermes images.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The imgfstools can't load the decompression dll in wine for some reason (i don't have a computer with windows). I could have used rdmsflsh.pl, but it also needs
the decompression dll. The XPR compression from this dll seems to be irrelevant, and LZX is implemented in libmspack (cabextract).
Or course i can port the lzx decompressor code from libmspack,
but it's a pity that no ready solution already exists.
The java code may have been ok, but it does not work too.
Hi,
have a play at this game.
Good?
Wouldn't it be good to have a game like this on WM that uses the g-sensor to control the arrow. I'm no developer myself but their are some people on this forum that are probably capable of developing something like this!
It's fun but addictive.
It would be good if a developer made this!
Thanks.
Let you in on a little secret: I'm already working on it
I'll let you in on another secret... Cyclone is the man!!!
Can't wait, my friend!
Haha thanks
Uhm, don't expect a great result all too soon. I am engaged in a few projects right now (Boggle, FFP_LS, another secret project, this, web-design, etc.) ... but I have been doing my studying and I think I can make this pretty awesome. I even have a level-structure for it, to give it a little twist
Speaking of which, FFP_LS2.5 is close to completion [almost ready for Beta testing] ... just got to fix up INI parsing which for some reason just stopped working! But I'll make some progress on this soon and post up some Proof Of Concepts.
Awesome!
Cyclonezephyrxz7 said:
Haha thanks
Uhm, don't expect a great result all too soon. I am engaged in a few projects right now (Boggle, FFP_LS, another secret project, this, web-design, etc.) ... but I have been doing my studying and I think I can make this pretty awesome. I even have a level-structure for it, to give it a little twist
Speaking of which, FFP_LS2.5 is close to completion [almost ready for Beta testing] ... just got to fix up INI parsing which for some reason just stopped working! But I'll make some progress on this soon and post up some Proof Of Concepts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Touch HD using XDA App
It appears the official linux kernel sources for the mytouch 3g slide by HTC have been released.
I wonder if anyone will be able to build a custom overclock kernel based on these sources. The Reason I ask is I'am currently running CM7 Nightly and the wifi appears to have issues with data connections/wifi signal being lost where I must disable it and re-enable it to re-gain connectivity
http://developer.htc.com/
The exact url http://dl4.htc.com/RomCode/Source_and_Binaries/espresso-MR-2.6.32-g98e09f3.tar.gz
Maybe dumfuq and/or drowingchild can build a oc kernel based on these sources. I'm not even sure these contain the correct wireless drivers. I assume they do.
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA Premium App
so after thinking about this a bit more, and since the cm7 kernel provides overclocking upto 825, which is enough for me. I'm thinking i can just grab https://github.com/CyanogenMod/htc-kernel-msm7227/ and swap out the modules dir for wireless tiwlan_drv.ko and sdio.ko with the ones from the HTC kernel sources. and try to compile..
Let us know how that works out
xarejayx said:
so after thinking about this a bit more, and since the cm7 kernel provides overclocking upto 825, which is enough for me. I'm thinking i can just grab https://github.com/CyanogenMod/htc-kernel-msm7227/ and swap out the modules dir for wireless tiwlan_drv.ko and sdio.ko with the ones from the HTC kernel sources. and try to compile..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Word let us know if it work
xarejayx said:
so after thinking about this a bit more, and since the cm7 kernel provides overclocking upto 825, which is enough for me. I'm thinking i can just grab https://github.com/CyanogenMod/htc-kernel-msm7227/ and swap out the modules dir for wireless tiwlan_drv.ko and sdio.ko with the ones from the HTC kernel sources. and try to compile..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
I'm unable to build the kernel, if anyone can help me out, let me know.
Edit: I fixed it.
[email protected]:~/htc-kernel-msm7227$ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=$CCOMPILER -j`grep 'processor' /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l`
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/arm/Kconfig
CHK include/linux/version.h
UPD include/linux/version.h
Generating include/asm-arm/mach-types.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-arm
CC kernel/bounds.s
GEN include/linux/bounds.h
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/asm/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘get_markers’:
scripts/mod/modpost.c:1562:12: warning: ignoring return value of ‘asprintf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘add_marker’:
scripts/mod/modpost.c:1982:10: warning: ignoring return value of ‘asprintf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
HOSTCC scripts/kallsyms
scripts/kallsyms.c: In function ‘read_symbol’:
scripts/kallsyms.c:112:9: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fgets’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
HOSTCC scripts/bin2c
CC init/main.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
init/main.c: In function 'do_one_initcall':
init/main.c:706:10: error: 'calltime.tv64' may be used uninitialized in this function
make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
make: *** [init] Error 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sooo...
xarejayx said:
I'm unable to build the kernel, if anyone can help me out, let me know.
Edit: I fixed it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Did it work????
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA Premium App
Okay, so I've been trying to port firefox os to the galaxy tab and have run into a problem. Take a look:
Code:
$ ./config.sh galaxy-tab-10.1
gpg: keyring `/home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/secring.gpg' created
gpg: keyring `/home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/pubring.gpg' created
gpg: /home/kobalt/.repoconfig/gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 920F5C65: public key "Repo Maintainer <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: key 338871A4: public key "Conley Owens <[email protected]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 2
gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 1)
Get https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo/clone.bundle
Get git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
remote: Counting objects: 237, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (139/139), done.
remote: Total 237 (delta 145), reused 166 (delta 80)
Receiving objects: 100% (237/237), 30.29 KiB, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (145/145), done.
From git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest
* [new branch] master -> origin/master
* [new branch] nightly -> origin/nightly
fatal: manifest 'galaxy-tab-10.1.xml' not available
fatal: manifest galaxy-tab-10.1.xml not found
Repo sync failed
I think this occurring because it is trying to find "galaxy-tab-10.1" in git://github.com/mozilla-b2g/b2g-manifest when there is no such file or directory with that name in the repository. Any help or thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated, and if this port is successful, I will make sure to post back the results.
I know this isn't helping..but I was wondering, isn't firefox os only for phones?
I didn't know that there was a tablet version..
Please let me know..
Either way, hope it progresses well!
Just saw a tweet from XDA they added a Firefox OS section, might be able to find your answer there
sw6lee said:
I know this isn't helping..but I was wondering, isn't firefox os only for phones?
I didn't know that there was a tablet version..
Please let me know..
Either way, hope it progresses well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I haven't really heard a lot about people using it on their tablets... but worst case scenario, I'll just have to adjust the dpi or a few minor things.
There is no reason I can think of why this wouldn't work.
nakedninja42 said:
Just saw a tweet from XDA they added a Firefox OS section, might be able to find your answer there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted a thread over there a little bit ago. Hopefully I'll hear back soon; I really want to find out what went wrong so I can get back to building this thing. :fingers-crossed:
Kobalt.Kitsune said:
Well, I haven't really heard a lot about people using it on their tablets... but worst case scenario, I'll just have to adjust the dpi or a few minor things.
There is no reason I can think of why this wouldn't work.
I posted a thread over there a little bit ago. Hopefully I'll hear back soon; I really want to find out what went wrong so I can get back to building this thing. :fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish I could contribute more to help out, it would be cool to see Firefox and Ubuntu ported. Best of luck!
Well I figured it out... It was indeed a problem with my manifest.xml file. Anyway, I'm glad I decided to spend the week building this. I've already learned so much about how to use git, c++, and a bunch of other invaluable skills from this little project.
Getting back on topic, this first build (if it works) will only be for us gt-p7510 users. After that, I will start work on the other galaxy tab models.
Cross your fingers. :fingers-crossed:
That's great news! Can't wait to check it out. :victory:
Great initiative, very curious how far you will get with this!
Awesome, if you need testers I will sign myself up for testing as my tab isnt doing anything at the moment.
I too would be happy to test for us. :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I747 using xda premium
Hi, this is interesting work, I'll be your next tester if you like... :good:
Also take a look at ReactOS project that has been developed for both ARM and x86, I'm struggling to run it on my tab(P7500)...
It has never been a problem to run P7510 ROMs on P7500, so don't be afraid to test all the things you get for the TABs
Thanks again for trying to bring new life(new OS I mean) in the SGT forums...
So I've been troubleshooting all morning with modifying our device tree + OmniROM source to be able to attempt a jflteatt build of the new ROM, and I finally have my build compiling as I write this.
However, based on the trouble I've had getting the grouper (N7) build to boot - it compiled just fine - I'm doubting that I'll be able to get our device's build booted on the first try either (assuming this build finishes without error).
As such, I wanted to reach out to you guys to see if anyone else is currently working on building this ROM - and hopefully create a place where we can share tips or troubleshoot for our specific devices.
I apologize if this is the wrong forum to post this in, but I figured if I posted this in any of the main forums it would get flooded with "plz build for Sprint S4" or "ETA plz?" posts....lol.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2483622
Grarak might be able to help...
DSA said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2483622
Grarak might be able to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks....I saw that thread, but figured that the chipsets are different enough that it wouldn't be of that much use. Am I off-base there?
CPA Poke said:
Thanks....I saw that thread, but figured that the chipsets are different enough that it wouldn't be of that much use. Am I off-base there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no your in the right forum, and yes your also right that that omnirom thread, while semi useful, isnt the best since our processors are different and what works for them might not work for us. Looking forward to watching this develop though,
Do you mean porting from source?
CNexus said:
Do you mean porting from source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course. I guess "port" probably wasn't the best verbiage...more precisely, adding our device tree to the OmniROM source
There's a write up on xda-university on porting from source. Might wanna take a look at it
I'm not sure what the point of this thread is though. No point discussing it if you haven't even tried it/reached a compile/runtime error
CNexus said:
There's a write up on xda-university on porting from source. Might wanna take a look at it
I'm not sure what the point of this thread is though. No point discussing it if you haven't even tried it/reached a compile/runtime error
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That guide was my main starting point with all of this, actually...however I'm thinking that it was written by someone who's first language is something other than English, as I always end up getting lost midway through because I literally can't figure out what he/she is trying to say.
And I've been at work all day but managed to remote in to my home PC a couple times - both times discovering that the build had failed, and both times attempting to troubleshoot each error. I was planning on posting the error and my roomservice.xml (as I suspect it's probably where I'm going wrong), so I'll post them shortly.
CPA Poke said:
That guide was my main starting point with all of this, actually...however I'm thinking that it was written by someone who's first language is something other than English, as I always end up getting lost midway through because I literally can't figure out what he/she is trying to say.
And I've been at work all day but managed to remote in to my home PC a couple times - both times discovering that the build had failed, and both times attempting to troubleshoot each error. I was planning on posting the error and my roomservice.xml (as I suspect it's probably where I'm going wrong), so I'll post them shortly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know your circumstances, but I was able to understand the guide perfectly and my first language is english.
It might be better if you take to the OmniROM irc chat (#omni for dev chat) and say you're trying to add support for your device and just list the error you're getting.
CNexus said:
I don't know your circumstances, but I was able to understand the guide perfectly and my first language is english.
It might be better if you take to the OmniROM irc chat (#omni for dev chat) and say you're trying to add support for your device and just list the error you're getting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
've been working on it with all the necessary file (so i think). One of my team mates help me out with jf tree but havn' had any successful build yet. usually get an error when its close to being finish so have to troubleshoot one fail build at a time
I dont know why you need to run of to the omini irc and abandon this one...i believe in team work. the IRC is a lot of help they help me t roubleshoot my way through...at the same time will be nice to have a discussion among individuals who actually uses our device. the people i've met in the irc do not use gs4 or any form of it from what i saw
CPA Poke said:
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your discussion is welcome here. I completely understand your dilemma. But if you are having issues it might be beneficial to post the specific issue you're having instead of trying to promote discussion in this thread. Im sure if you asked someone they would explain how they got to the solution of the problem.
Sent from my XT912 using xda app-developers app
CPA Poke said:
Haha, my "circumstances" are that I'm am accountant (see my user name) and I tend to over analyze things and create problems where there are none.
I'm also trying as hard as I can to learn as much as I can, all the while trying not to bother the real devs...but I'm late to the Android game (relatively) and it seems to me that the distribution of users on XDA is pretty polarizing - either they are (a) seasoned devs who either have prior/current experience in programming or have some type of IT background, or (b) are useless, ungrateful noobs who just got rid of their iPhone yesterday and now want to go bonkers hacking their device. At least those users that actually post.
So my problem thus far (and the main reason why I thought this was the most appropriate forum to have this discussion) is that, in the year that I've been on here, I've had a hard time finding any material for folks like me...people who enjoy LEARNING (not just typing a problem and having someone fix it for them), enjoy exploring the extent that our awesome technology can be taken to, and are genuinely interested in being a "seeder" - not a "leecher" - in the development community.
So, again, I apologize if this doesn't belong here. I did read the rules sticky before even starting the OP (imagine that lol), and I guess my interpretation was that this sort of discussion would be welcome. I wasn't asking anyone to fix my problems, I wasn't asking for ETAs...I just wanted to offer up a medium for discussion for anyone interested.
But I will check out the irc. Good idea, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand, I've been through the exact same thing (and am still usually unable to find help on things like source building and kernels). I was not trying to discredit your post, just
And by "circumstances" I meant whatever language/languages you know, or background you come from, etc etc that lead you to have trouble understanding the xda-university write-up.
No offense was intended, but it does help to fix errors when you post the error you're getting lol.
Surge1223 said:
Your discussion is welcome here. I completely understand your dilemma. But if you are having issues it might be beneficial to post the specific issue you're having instead of trying to promote discussion in this thread. Im sure if you asked someone they would explain how they got to the solution of the problem.
Sent from my XT912 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CNexus said:
I understand, I've been through the exact same thing (and am still usually unable to find help on things like source building and kernels). I was not trying to discredit your post, just
And by "circumstances" I meant whatever language/languages you know, or background you come from, etc etc that lead you to have trouble understanding the xda-university write-up.
No offense was intended, but it does help to fix errors when you post the error you're getting lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely agreed. Honestly I was trying to be as non-noob as possible and wanted to try and work through as many of the errors related to syntax, etc on my own, saving the real discussion for the thread.
I'm going to take a look at this for jfltespr this weekend. I'll start adding my notes here as well.
garwynn said:
I'm going to take a look at this for jfltespr this weekend. I'll start adding my notes here as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been working on JFLTEATT for a bit, very, very frustrating since CM's selinux and AOSP selinux are very different. causing a LOT of build issues.
take a look at my github, you'll be able to fork my
android_kernel_samsung_jf
android_device_samsung_jf-common
device trees
https://github.com/jakew02
hopefully this gives you a head-start.
I should have a build up for jflteatt within the next few hours , by tonight im hoping.
Update So, i got a booting build. just needs to be fine-tuned to actually work!
jakew02 said:
I've been working on JFLTEATT for a bit, very, very frustrating since CM's selinux and AOSP selinux are very different. causing a LOT of build issues.
take a look at my github, you'll be able to fork my
android_kernel_samsung_jf
android_device_samsung_jf-common
device trees
https://github.com/jakew02
hopefully this gives you a head-start.
I should have a build up for jflteatt within the next few hours , by tonight im hoping.
Update So, i got a booting build. just needs to be fine-tuned to actually work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
CPA Poke said:
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bluetooth should be fixed now
https://github.com/omnirom/android_...mmit/62d71414709f0f6282b8d108cc66716f37872f96
btw remove selinux union
then it should build correct
Grarak said:
bluetooth should be fixed now
https://github.com/omnirom/android_...mmit/62d71414709f0f6282b8d108cc66716f37872f96
btw remove selinux union
then it should build correct
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MONEY, thanks my friend.
CPA Poke said:
Seriously? That's great! I appreciate the PM's btw.
Did you run into this error at all during your compile?
Code:
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/system/usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata
/home/dev/omni/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: *loading policy configuration from /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
Install: /home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/root/fstab.qcom
device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te":2:ERROR 'duplicate declaration of type/attribute' at token ';' on line 6889:
#line 1 "device/samsung/jf-common/sepolicy/property.te"
type bluetooth_prop, property_type;
checkpolicy: *error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/home/dev/omni/out/target/product/jflteatt/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Edit: Forked your device trees, and syncing now. While that's downloading, I'm curious what "fine tuning" you're referring to? Are you having NFC/bluetooth issues by chance?
I remember reading in the i9500 thread that @Grarak was having issues with bluetooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it boots up.. Shows the boot animation, the capacitative buttons light up and vibrate on touch, but the screen stays black and it eventually force reboots. i originally used CyanogenMod trees but decided to rebase to these device trees.https://github.com/AOSP-S4, but running into errors again.
I PM'd task and he said that he already has it up and running and there's no need to port,, just sync add device trees and build.. but when i did that i ran into about a million build failures that i had to manually fix, hence the github
Update: so based on what task said, I'm going to try just creating my own device tree, basing off of cyanogenmod's very first commit for jflteatt , jf-common , and kernel_samsung_jf. here goes nothing
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk