OK guys...so I was plagued with this problem like a lot of other people using the g-tab. I tried all of the other fixes like installing a different kernel, keeping wifi and/or cpu alive while sleeping, wiping and re-installing, etc. None of these worked for me like many others. I started experimenting, and I decided that the problem had to be something involving CPU load. I created a profile in SetCPU that reduced the CPU frequency to a minimum value while the screen was off and/or sleeping, and !!! Problem solved. I can turn screen off for a second, a minute or an hour and when I push the power button, the tab wakes immediately. This definitely solved the problem for me, and I would like some feedback as to whether this fixes it for anyone else. As a side-note, I am running the Vegan-GingerBread as advertised (STOCK).
Cheers!!!
what was the profile that you set on set cpu? And did this help the wifi from disconnecting when it sleeps?
camblue said:
what was the profile that you set on set cpu? And did this help the wifi from disconnecting when it sleeps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In SetCPU I created a profile that was "Screen Off" MAX: 216, MIN:216, and it fixed all of my issues!!!
Try my latest kernel (version9) with no setcpu and let me know how it goes
Question...
clemsyn said:
Try my latest kernel (version9) with no setcpu and let me know how it goes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KK...will do, and I will let you know!!! Why has GOJIMI not implemented this if it fixes the problems though??? Is this recent?
subyfan said:
KK...will do, and I will let you know!!! Why has GOJIMI not implemented this if it fixes the problems though??? Is this recent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, just uploaded recently. Lmk how it goes. I also fixed Bluetooth
I hate to keep asking but does your kernal fix the wifi not coming back on from sleep?
Thank you will try it but does that affect the battery strength at all?
subyfan said:
In SetCPU I created a profile that was "Screen Off" MAX: 216, MIN:216, and it fixed all of my issues!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
camblue said:
Thank you will try it but does that affect the battery strength at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think that it would only help battery seeing as how you are forcing the CPU down to it's lowest frequency.
subyfan said:
KK...will do, and I will let you know!!! Why has GOJIMI not implemented this if it fixes the problems though??? Is this recent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im gonna guess because what may be a "fix" for you is not for everyone. These tabs are tempermental at best and what works on some does not work on others. Demanding a dev include something you think is a fix in his work is kinda arrogant don't you think. If you can do better where is the link to your custom rom?
Moved to Q&A.
What are you talking about?
thebadfrog said:
Im gonna guess because what may be a "fix" for you is not for everyone. These tabs are tempermental at best and what works on some does not work on others. Demanding a dev include something you think is a fix in his work is kinda arrogant don't you think. If you can do better where is the link to your custom rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the thread? I am not talking about GOJIMI implementing MY fix...go back and actually read. Clemsyn, a VERY reputable g tab dev, has found a universal fix for the issue.
You think so? There is no universal fix for most issues. Clemsyn and pershoot have been battling this issue for months. Gojimi is a VERY reputable g tab dev as well. Along with several other people. What your not getting is that some of these tabs are slightly different enough that what you think is unversal may not be so and demanding one dev include another devs work because you think you know what your talking about is assinine
BTW....some don't have the issue at all and never have.
thebadfrog said:
You think so? There is no universal fix for most issues. Clemsyn and pershoot have been battling this issue for months. Gojimi is a VERY reputable g tab dev as well. Along with several other people. What your not getting is that some of these tabs are slightly different enough that what you think is unversal may not be so and demanding one dev include another devs work because you think you know what your talking about is assinine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol @ you dude...have a good day.
Related
http://www.nuerom.com/BlogEngine/post/2009/05/09/nueDynamicClock-13.aspx
Does what nueClockControl does, just in an automated way - hopefully it'll increase your battery life without too much of a hit on performance ... let me know how it works out for you, and consider making a donation if you find it genuinely useful =).
1.1 - major update - let me know if it works better for you!!
1.2 - fix minimum speed on startup bug, oops. sorry for any inconvenience this has caused
1.3 - fixed more bugs people were having (such as slow speed change, etc.).
it seem it can't work properly on my diam100.first,it can not preserve the frequency I seted when I run another program or when I power off for 5mins and turn it on.second,I am not sure the automatic clockcontrol is working.can you add a realtime frequency monitor to this software so that we can verify it was working.really appreciate your dedication.
damn...
wont even start on my Kaiser
Maranevim said:
wont even start on my Kaiser
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it's only for MSM7201A powered devices.
qq108108108 said:
it seem it can't work properly on my diam100.first,it can not preserve the frequency I seted when I run another program or when I power off for 5mins and turn it on.second,I am not sure the automatic clockcontrol is working.can you add a realtime frequency monitor to this software so that we can verify it was working.really appreciate your dedication.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the processor applet updates the frequency in real time (well, about twice every second). I think someone else was having problems with the DIAM100, my guess is it has DVFM turned on, which can lock the frequency. I'll look into that.
tnyynt said:
I believe it's only for MSM7201A powered devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and MSM7501A.. but dont get me wrong, MSM7x00 also can change frequency in realtime, I just haven't figured out how.
Maranevim said:
wont even start on my Kaiser
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It says on his website that it won't work on Kaiser's .
nueROM.com said:
Do not install on the HTC Titan/Mogul, HTC Vogue or HTC Kaiser. Do not install on a device that is not based on the MSM7xxx processor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ta
Dave
no2chem said:
the processor applet updates the frequency in real time (well, about twice every second). I think someone else was having problems with the DIAM100, my guess is it has DVFM turned on, which can lock the frequency. I'll look into that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree,that can explain why its frequency keep turning back to 528Mhz.thanks for your answer.
Mmmmh unfortunately don't work on my MSM7200 (LG KS20) (I know a crappy phone), it displays current frequency at 0.00mHz.
Too bad but great work!!!
can someone post the cab? for some reason my phone says i finished dling the file but i end up with an incomplete file. anyone know of a fix for that btw? thansk
i instaled in on my compatc IV mda and whell it instaled i configure it but dont know is it working how to check ;D
instaler below
MOD EDIT: don't distribute!
aman1127 said:
can someone post the cab? for some reason my phone says i finished dling the file but i end up with an incomplete file. anyone know of a fix for that btw? thansk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
download it using internet explorer.
thanks for the quick response. any recommended settings for max battery life? i used nueclock and set that to around 250mhz or so and found no real performance difference. i dont know how to set the new additional settings though.
pawelf1 said:
i instaled in on my compatc IV mda and whell it instaled i configure it but dont know is it working how to check ;D
instaler below
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kind of think the OP wants you to download from the site linked, rather than posting the cab here.
2. DISTRIBUTION. The nueROM website (http://www.nuerom.com) is the sole distribution point for nueROM and nueTools. You may not, without prior permission from Wei Enterprises, mirror nueROM or nueTools on your own website. However, you may compile a ROM image and distribute such image with nueTools or nueROM components included, provided you reference this license agreement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
qq108108108 said:
it seem it can't work properly on my diam100.first,it can not preserve the frequency I seted when I run another program or when I power off for 5mins and turn it on.second,I am not sure the automatic clockcontrol is working.can you add a realtime frequency monitor to this software so that we can verify it was working.really appreciate your dedication.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got the same problem on my Diamond...
Still had that with the static tool.
This is a perfect tool...simply one of the most wanted tools..
This and commmanagerpro (CMP) makes it possible to have an almost 75% battery left in the morning... GREAT.
I will go for a donation.
Still need the exe´s as that would make it perfect
BTW. Would like to make a shortut for start but cannot seem to find it - anyone had luck yet?
keep up the good work man
no2chem said:
http://www.nuerom.com/BlogEngine/post/2009/04/20/nueDynamicClock.aspx
Does what nueClockControl does, just in an automated way - hopefully it'll increase your battery life without too much of a hit on performance ... let me know how it works out for you, and consider making a donation if you find it genuinely useful =).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, I this thing works nice and solid, I've seen some pretty serious battery increase.. usually by niow my battery would be at 10% or so, but it's over 60%! hot damn! thanks no2chem, you rock as usual.
it sounds great, would try on my new Asus P835 ! thanks !
my phone locked up pretty hard tonight, not sure what happened, but I've never had this before, so it could be the dynamic clock, but I dunno.
what does the voltage setting do?
no2chem said:
http://www.nuerom.com/BlogEngine/post/2009/04/20/nueDynamicClock.aspx
Does what nueClockControl does, just in an automated way - hopefully it'll increase your battery life without too much of a hit on performance ... let me know how it works out for you, and consider making a donation if you find it genuinely useful =).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Thanks for the great tool! This is really a Godsend for the Diamond Users!
Are you able to explain what does the voltage setting does (Level 0 ~ Level 7 and auto)?
Regards
Stanley Lim
mr.jaguar said:
my phone locked up pretty hard tonight, not sure what happened, but I've never had this before, so it could be the dynamic clock, but I dunno.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. This tool is pretty unstable. Locks up the Sprint Treo Pro while on a phone call.
Now that the X10 is rooted, anyone install SetCPU yet. And if so is it fully functional?
Yeah, it's working fine for me.
Fuzalert2k said:
Yeah, it's working fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you can change ur signature now
Fuzalert2k said:
Yeah, it's working fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, good, I'll buy it now and get back to yaz...
Fuzalert2k said:
Yeah, it's working fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh... did you manage to overclock, if so, what was the highest stable overclock?
RodneyBR said:
Ok, good, I'll buy it now and get back to yaz...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No dude, don't buy it! it's free for XDA users.
RodneyBR said:
Oh... did you manage to overclock, if so, what was the highest stable overclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it won't let me go higher than 993 mhz
if decrease the clock speed to the max of 600mhz,will it save more power?
yeah tried as well and the max is 993mhz. weird
(unless i'm missing something, I never used setcpu before)
I use OverclockWidget for my wife's X10.
Off screen frequency : 250~384
On screen frequence : 576~1000Mhz
it work like charm !
but your not going over 1000mhz? not overclocking
Mod. edit: not dev related, moved to general
Fuzalert2k said:
No dude, don't buy it! it's free for XDA users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's free, really. How does that work?
czw2002cn said:
if decrease the clock speed to the max of 600mhz,will it save more power?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I just leave it set to "ondemand", so that way it will automatically adjust the speed as needed (Max: 998MHz, Min: 245MHz). My max is 998MHz.
what firmware we can use? which is highly recommended? R2BA026?
SetCpu and more, can we use Juice defender to increase autonomy
RodneyBR said:
Well, I just leave it set to "ondemand", so that way it will automatically adjust the speed as needed (Max: 998MHz, Min: 245MHz). My max is 998MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you know the phone does that anyway right?
I don't speak French so I can't comment on that but I've been using SetCPU since the 020 root and it SEEMS to work alright. Sometimes when I open it, it says something about failing but then it works OK.
I'm currently on R2BA026 rooted and it works for me. I also use JuiceDefender but to be honest I'm getting more and more convinced that's not helping any more. JuicePlotter in particular is struggling and keeps stalling, with gaps in the graph frequently, not sure why but that's not relevant to this thread so I'll leave that.
But I do NOT use it to overclock and would not recommend that! For a start, it would cane the battery. Rather, I use it to "throttle" the CPU speed. I think that's what most of us use it for. E.g. when the screen is off, it stops the CPU working too hard (and thus saves battery). Also when power is running low, CPU is throttled to save it. By throttled I mean "restricted to 245Mhz".
It's free to XDA members because the dev kindly put it up here somewhere for download - if you're looking for "how that works" on the Market, stop now because that's not how it works! The Market doesn't give you a discount for being on XDA.
Just search for it on here, or wait for someone who has used it to point you in the right direction. I'd search for it for you but I'm about to head out.
Ungruntled said:
I don't speak French so I can't comment on that but I've been using SetCPU since the 020 root and it SEEMS to work alright. Sometimes when I open it, it says something about failing but then it works OK.
I'm currently on R2BA026 rooted and it works for me. I also use JuiceDefender but to be honest I'm getting more and more convinced that's not helping any more. JuicePlotter in particular is struggling and keeps stalling, with gaps in the graph frequently, not sure why but that's not relevant to this thread so I'll leave that.
But I do NOT use it to overclock and would not recommend that! For a start, it would cane the battery. Rather, I use it to "throttle" the CPU speed. I think that's what most of us use it for. E.g. when the screen is off, it stops the CPU working too hard (and thus saves battery). Also when power is running low, CPU is throttled to save it. By throttled I mean "restricted to 245Mhz".
It's free to XDA members because the dev kindly put it up here somewhere for download - if you're looking for "how that works" on the Market, stop now because that's not how it works! The Market doesn't give you a discount for being on XDA.
Just search for it on here, or wait for someone who has used it to point you in the right direction. I'd search for it for you but I'm about to head out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we cant overclock anyway until there is a custom kernel. and you get bet your arse that when there is one, ill be overclocking to the max zoooom
I've used SetCPU for a few weeks and now I've been using my X10 without SetCPU for a few weeks and I've noticed zero difference in power consumption.
I'm guessing Android does a fine job itself at downclocking the CPU when it doesn't have to do heavy tasks.
Cinner said:
I've used SetCPU for a few weeks and now I've been using my X10 without SetCPU for a few weeks and I've noticed zero difference in power consumption.
I'm guessing Android does a fine job itself at downclocking the CPU when it doesn't have to do heavy tasks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. i just uninstalled it and my phone is also more stable.
OK, I have written an app to attempt and stop call wonkyness on CM7 builds. Specifically the phone locking up when making and receiving calls.
It's my observation that it's the mic that causes the phone to lock up and so this app opens and closes the mic every minute to keep it "fresh". It's a long shot, but I can't seem to duplicate wonkyness with it enabled so I'm posting it for other to try.
Now after a few positive comments to help boost my confidence in the app, I've made it's own thread to make it easy to track comments.
Just install and run (or just reboot as it auto-start on boot). To disable, uninstall it.
Please post your results!
Change Log:
Version 1.4
Made service more persistent by adding notification bar. Turns out, Android was killing off the service when memory was running low causing wonk to surface.
Version 1.3
Can only be installed on internal memory. Needed to make sure the service can started up on boot. (Thanks to mjukis for pointing this out)
Version 1.2
Only dewonkificates when screen is off to avoid conflicts with any apps you may be using.
Removed debug logging
[Post edited because the wonkyness is still there and this .apk works fine to fix it]
Dude.... As best as I can tell in 20 minutes' time, this damn thing seems to actually work! Gotta tell ya how skeptical I was....but I'm pretty flippin' pleased right now!
Good looking out!!
Much appreciated for this app.
While it's still too early to say it's 100% working, so far so good.
I have had the wonk since build 3 to 23 (except for 16).
I will keep testing and report back often.
That's great news and I'm happy that it looks like it's working for people. I was on the edge of rolling back and this was a desperate attempt to fix it.
Agree with the op. Can't say for sure its the miracle I've been waiting for... but 4 calls in (admittedly 2 from myself, ) no wonks. When I'd expect all to be wonky
If this 'wonklessisity' continues you will surely become supreme ruler of xda!
Will report back soon.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
TheMasterBaron said:
That's great news and I'm happy that it looks like it's working for people. I was on the edge of rolling back and this was a desperate attempt to fix it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your thoughts and battery impact?....and would some timeframe greater or less than 1 min. factor in??
Does this fix it?
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#change,2642
shaggy-h said:
Does this fix it?
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#change,2642
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that's a different problem.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk
makelegs said:
What are your thoughts and battery impact?....and would some timeframe greater or less than 1 min. factor in??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently I can't see any measurable battery drain. Dewonkificator doesn't even show on the About phone->Battery use screen. Increasing the time between dewonkification might be work, but since battery doesn't seem to be a issue and we don't know what the source of the problem is I don't think its worth risking or investigating.
I also believe it have something to do with the mic, since all apps that use it have the same freeze, and it seems to work for me. Thanks
TheMasterBaron said:
Currently I can't see any measurable battery drain. Dewonkificator doesn't even show on the About phone->Battery use screen. Increasing the time between dewonkification might be work, but since battery doesn't seem to be a issue and we don't know what the source of the problem is I don't think its worth risking or investigating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems reasonable enough, to me.
TheMasterBaron said:
Currently I can't see any measurable battery drain. Dewonkificator doesn't even show on the About phone->Battery use screen. Increasing the time between dewonkification might be work, but since battery doesn't seem to be a issue and we don't know what the source of the problem is I don't think its worth risking or investigating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe watchdog would be a better app for checking. Would give us a better idea of CPU use. Also juice plotter may help see prior and after install battery consumption
I've tested it,and havent got any wongkiness for today. I think its working...
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Got source?
fitsnugly said:
Got source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added to the OP
TheMasterBaron said:
Added to the OP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gracias!
You deserve an E-Cookie for coming up with such an awesome name
Wonky just visited me when my wife called. Installed your dewonky app for testing.
Thanks.
This bug is the reason I got off CM7 nightlies, so damn annoying. Maybe this is a Gingerbread thing rather than a Nexus S problem cause the Nexus S is supposed to be rebooting itself while in calls as I'm sure everyone knows.
I am sorta new to this O/C business, I have installed multiple roms, on multiple vibrants. But I am unsure of my phone's limit on the whole overclocking, is it just trial and error work like I think it is? and If so is there a surefire way I have reached my limit? or is it just going to be when I try a kernel that should clock at 1.4, I will only get the benchmark score of the one at 1.3? Thanks for the info. First post, yipee. Oh, and thanks to all the Devs and their support out there, especially the Trigger Devs and Galaxy Star team you guys do work.
Look out for overheating and random reboots.
Abu-7abash said:
Look out for overheating and random reboots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This...it will be pretty obvious when you hit your limit.
My dad is experiencing lag, a lot of scroll stuttering and some touchscreen issues as well with his oneplus x. I have the same phone and don't experience any of this, I've tried talking to oneplus support but their support is a complete embarrassment. I've also tried flashing cyanogenmod and the issues remain, any suggestions?
rylark said:
My dad is experiencing lag, a lot of scroll stuttering and some touchscreen issues as well with his oneplus x. I have the same phone and don't experience any of this, I've tried talking to oneplus support but their support is a complete embarrassment. I've also tried flashing cyanogenmod and the issues remain, any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Change the governor from interactive to conservative and report back.
parasthakur37 said:
Change the governor from interactive to conservative and report back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have tried changing to every single governor, didn't work out.
Bumping...
rylark said:
Bumping...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just for the sake of giving it a shot, try activating the 'Show CPU Usage' option in Developer Options, and see if there's any process that might be using too much CPU. Also, download CPU Spy and check in what frequency the phone stays the longer.
I'd try that, though you said you used a different rom. If you didn't dirty flash (you surely didn't, but who knows) it and the issue still remains, the phone's probably faulty. In that case, try pushing customer support a little more.
a_lleras said:
Just for the sake of giving it a shot, try activating the 'Show CPU Usage' option in Developer Options, and see if there's any process that might be using too much CPU. Also, download CPU Spy and check in what frequency the phone stays the longer.
I'd try that, though you said you used a different rom. If you didn't dirty flash (you surely didn't, but who knows) it and the issue still remains, the phone's probably faulty. In that case, try pushing customer support a little more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU usage is exactly like mine, this really seems hardware related.. If only Oneplus answered.