I.have assumed that the 1.2ghz soc on the sensation and the new evo were the same ..I was reading some Qualcomm info and it noted the msm8260 as the soc in the sensation and the msm8660 as the soc for the 3d..does anyone know the difference..is it for the extra power needed for 3d effects ?
Mod please delete post I've found my answer. Thanks
do you mind posting the answer here?
XxDjbluexX said:
do you mind posting the answer here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 what did you find? I read a while back that the EvO3D is a 1.5ghz dual core underclocked to 1.2ghz
Wow.. I hope you are right any links to it?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
The difference should be that the 8660 is CDMA and 8260 is GSM.
I googled and found this - http://www.nordichardware.com/news/...lcomm-demonstrates-new-msm8660-processor.html
*EDIT* Here's another with video http://www.phonearena.com/news/Qualcomm-demos-3rd-gen-Snapdragon-MSM8660-smooth-mobile-video_id18548
Should be no reason we couldn't get these badboys higher than 1.5ghz
According to the link below, 8260 is hspa+ only while the 8660 is for cdma and hspa+ no difference in performance
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...msm8660-12ghz-dual-core-snapdragon-processor/
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
crabjoe said:
The difference should be that the 8660 is CDMA and 8260 is GSM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right. Here is a link.
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...msm8660-12ghz-dual-core-snapdragon-processor/
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
phyba said:
According to the link below, 8260 is hspa+ only while the 8660 is for cdma and hspa+ no difference in performance
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...msm8660-12ghz-dual-core-snapdragon-processor/
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it.
I like seeing rev b in the chips. I hope Sprint will unleash it one day.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)
Yea only difference I saw was what has already been mentioned ..one other thing is it has it clocked at 1.2 ghz for the 8260 and 1.2 and 1.5 for the 8660..maybe that's just because the latter has been used at both clock speeds.. pretty cool chart tho
Dont forget the 256MB of additional RAM in the 3D
vWvSTATICvWv said:
+1 what did you find? I read a while back that the EvO3D is a 1.5ghz dual core underclocked to 1.2ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your Excatly right thats the main difference the evo 3d if unlocked could run 1.5 no problem since it has been downclocked
j2themax said:
Your Excatly right thats the main difference the evo 3d if unlocked could run 1.5 no problem since it has been downclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not entirely true. Not all processors are created equal. Htc could be downclocking the batches that failed @ 1.5ghz. Thus leaving us with little to no headroom.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Rem3Dy said:
That is not entirely true. Not all processors are created equal. Htc could be downclocking the batches that failed @ 1.5ghz. Thus leaving us with little to no headroom.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right htc would not have quality control.
The main reason they're downclocked is for battery life.
j2themax said:
Right htc would not have quality control.
The main reason they're downclocked is for battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Incorrect. The fact they are downclocked to 1.2 could very well be because they were unstable at 1.5. And the stable 1.5 chips are being saved for another device down the road.
Intel, amd, and nvidia do this all the time, so its very well possible that these are reject 1.5 ghz chips. They will still overclock but may require more volts to hit 1.5 or higher.
And yes, they could be downclocking them to save battery life, but your theory isnt more accurate then his.
test878 said:
Incorrect. The fact they are downclocked to 1.2 could very well be because they were unstable at 1.5. And the stable 1.5 chips are being saved for another device down the road.
Intel, amd, and nvidia do this all the time, so its very well possible that these are reject 1.5 ghz chips. They will still overclock but may require more volts to hit 1.5 or higher.
And yes, they could be downclocking them to save battery life, but your theory isnt more accurate then his.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand what you are saying but I'm not sure I agree..I don't think that they make a soc and hope its stable at 1.5 ghz and if not just dump them on the e3d..I know each chip is slightly different but not that much so ...I believe we will have some headroom with this chip as it is set to be in devices at 1.5 ghz..**** the chip in the g2 and other have be able to clock almost to 2ghz..and the chip in those are very similiar to the chip in the e3d except for the extra core..they are built on the same.architecture..just my thoughts could be wrong
firmbiz94 said:
I understand what you are saying but I'm not sure I agree..I don't think that they make a soc and hope its stable at 1.5 ghz and if not just dump them on the e3d..I know each chip is slightly different but not that much so ...I believe we will have some headroom with this chip as it is set to be in devices at 1.5 ghz..**** the chip in the g2 and other have be able to clock almost to 2ghz..and the chip in those are very similiar to the chip in the e3d except for the extra core..they are built on the same.architecture..just my thoughts could be wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I work for AMD, and that's exactly how it's done... You manufacture a large batch of silicon, and based on testing, you separate the chips based on highest stable speed. We simply clock them lower and label them with another model number. This has been done since the beginning...
With that said, they might have had enough chips that didn't perform well at 1.5GHz, so they just limited them all. It doesn't NECESSARILY mean everyone is getting a 1.2GHz max chip.
Wow..so u basically manufacture the same chip and based on performance give it a different model number ? And I thought all these different chips were designed individually..guess I was wrong..probably bc I know nothing.about manufacturing socs..
Obviously there are different core designs, which are engineered separately, but there are only slight tweaks, if ANY between multiple chips in the same series with different clock speeds.
Remember the AMD Barton-core 2500+? and the 3200+? Socket A chips? They were IDENTICAL. That's why all the gamers bought the cheaper 2500+ and just changed the front-side bus to 200Mhz. Blammo, you saved $200 instantly.
ScrapMaker said:
Obviously there are different core designs, which are engineered separately, but there are only slight tweaks, if ANY between multiple chips in the same series with different clock speeds.
Remember the AMD Barton-core 2500+? and the 3200+? Socket A chips? They were IDENTICAL. That's why all the gamers bought the cheaper 2500+ and just changed the front-side bus to 200Mhz. Blammo, you saved $200 instantly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So do tell me what CPU I should get and save $200 now?
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Related
So I've been wondering does keeping it oc at 1.2ghz damage anything to the phone? I've read that it can kill your device lifespan is that true? Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
If your device can't handle it... Yes
xriderx66 said:
If your device can't handle it... Yes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey rider...what you mean by that ..like when it hard freezes or what ?
I assume the vibrant can handle the 1.2ghz with ease?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
bosina said:
hey rider...what you mean by that ..like when it hard freezes or what ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
airhop7 said:
I assume the vibrant can handle the 1.2ghz with ease?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly.
Some of the Vibrants just can't handle ANY overclocking at all, they just freeze, and reboot too much because your processor is being worked too hard when it can't do it.
If you have a normal, regular vibrant, then yeah you can such as me, i can overclock as much as i want, i've gone to 1.4 with no problems...
but some people do have the problem, and having that can burn the plastic in your phone (its happened to a few over the year)
xriderx66 said:
Not exactly.
Some of the Vibrants just can't handle ANY overclocking at all, they just freeze, and reboot too much because your processor is being worked too hard when it can't do it.
If you have a normal, regular vibrant, then yeah you can such as me, i can overclock as much as i want, i've gone to 1.4 with no problems...
but some people do have the problem, and having that can burn the plastic in your phone (its happened to a few over the year)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep.
Mine can run at 1.4 EASY with no heating up at all (I was surprised).
I wish there was a 1.6+ kernel, so I could push this processor to the max.
To understand the limits of the Vibrant's processor it's important to understand processors in general.
The process of manufacturing for a processor is not perfect. You get pristine chips and below standard chips; so essentially no two processors are the same just like fingerprints. So what they do for quality control is stress test each one individually within a specific range. If it can handle 1Ghz up to 1.x then it passes, if it can't hit 1Ghz minimum then it's destroyed/recycled (or whatever numbers Samsung in this case felt were reasonable). It's the only way to ensure every device functions the same.
Now translate that into people's individual phone. In essence it's the luck of the draw. Did you get the perfect manufactured chip? Only way to tell is to over clock it and stress test it. Some people get the perfect one, and others get the ones that barely made the cut. It works the same for all electronics.
Hope this information helped.
---Giddy Ninja
I am not familiar with android os, so i wanted to ask people who have some knowledge behind it a question.
What do you see improving with the thunderbolt when gingerbread gets released?
Do you think the thunderbolt will be able to improve its chances to still stand out against the dual-core phones with the help of 2.3?
I love my thunderbolt, it is my very first Android OS device and i am glad to be an early adopter of the 4g LTE network, i do personally feel that i put myself in a rough position because i chose a phone with a single core. Should i feel this way?
Thanks XDA, i've spent so many hours learning about phones in general on this board. it is my new home!
No, single core is great.
1. Apps must be written to utilize dual core (the thunderbolt can be overclocked to 2ghz, which is much faster than needed)
2. Any phone you buy will be outdated in terms of current technology within 6 months. (Don't compare to other technology. Compare to apps you want to run. There are no foreseeable apps the thunderbolt can't run well)
Imho, dual core is currently just a gimmick to attract buyers and I don't think it will be necessary to own one for about 2 years.
I've used the attic, compared to thunderbolt you can't even notice a speed difference.
As for the usual bionic/thunderbolt debate. I believe the Ram is more important then dual core ATM. And if the bionic really only has 512, the thunderbolt will do perfectly fine stacked against it.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
gregdalfonso said:
the thunderbolt can be overclocked to 2ghz, aka the same speed as 1ghz dual core
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A 1GHz dual core processor is not 2GHz. Its 1GHz, both cores running at 500MHz.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
i've played with an Atrix before the TB came out. The dual core did nothing for it. My TB is noticeably faster than the Atrix was. Plus ATT 4G service is a joke.
As far as differences between 22 and 23, check this out:
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-android-2-2-froyo-and-android-2-3-gingerbread/
Probably not alot to to write home about, but i def like the gingerbread keyboard over the froyo keyboard.
Ive never seen a dual core referred to as the speed of the 2 cores added. Every dual core I've heard of refers to the speed of the individual processors. ie, all the new ones (tegra 2, exynos, evo 3d snapdragon) have 2 cores each at 1 ghz
Leading to the equation:
2 x 1 ghz cores != 1 x 2 ghz core != 2 x 500 mhz cores
You have nothing to worry about. The snapdragon CPU is second generation with great performance and low power, and It's coupled with adreno 205 graphics which is very capable. Your phone with be high end for easily 1.5 years matching the other phones out there. I'm not too worried about dual core CPU's yet because no software is taking advantage of it yet. And android OS won't be updated to utilize dual core till version 2.4. So you have nothing to worry about.
Hell my nexus one I still find top notch in my opinion.
I be worried about the quad cores coming out by the end of q3. That's what I want. I love my tb. I won it in a local contest and I still have my upgrade. Can you say win
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
papi92 said:
I be worried about the quad cores coming out by the end of q3. That's what I want. I love my tb. I won it in a local contest and I still have my upgrade. Can you say win
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quad scores mean very little to the end user experience go buy a desktop PC.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
miketoasty said:
Quad scores mean very little to the end user experience go buy a desktop PC.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, no he meant the quad cores processors coming out like the Tegra 3.
He said quad core not quadrant scores.
RogerPodacter said:
You have nothing to worry about. The snapdragon CPU is second generation with great performance and low power, and It's coupled with adreno 205 graphics which is very capable. Your phone with be high end for easily 1.5 years matching the other phones out there. I'm not too worried about dual core CPU's yet because no software is taking advantage of it yet. And android OS won't be updated to utilize dual core till version 2.4. So you have nothing to worry about.
Hell my nexus one I still find top notch in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree Roger. The real problem with dual core is Android software is not written to take full advantage of both cores. This was evident when I had a chance to play with my friends LG Optimus 2X. FPS was fantastic on nenamark averaging just below 80. All games in the Tegra zone played great. However, when it came to day to day stuff it lagged. For example, sometimes it took two swipes for the screen to register a touch. Web pages with heavy flash had awful load times.
Ubermicro13 said:
A 1GHz dual core processor is not 2GHz. Its 1GHz, both cores running at 500MHz.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhh No. Its a Single Processor with 2 cores both running at 1ghz. none are run at 500 mhz.
and As for Quad Cores and Dual Cores, Im Loving the Battery life they are gonna bring to us. The Point isn't just performance but also low Energy Usage.
papi92 said:
I be worried about the quad cores coming out by the end of q3. That's what I want. I love my tb. I won it in a local contest and I still have my upgrade. Can you say win
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Win indeed sir. I'm a VZW employee and can upgrade every 9 months
Sent from my ADR6400L
Can you imagine the epic tears that will flow for quad core battery issues?
... just sayin'
HorsexD said:
Uhh No. Its a Single Processor with 2 cores both running at 1ghz. none are run at 500 mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
And while applications might not be specifically written for dual core, the OS is. That alone provides some improvement.
But whatever. Our processor will be fine for quite some time.
And correct, a 1GHz dual core runs at 2x1GHz, not 2x500Mhz
Anyway we're not going to see gingerbread here for at least 4 months
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
As for the OP, I don't think enough improvements from 2.2-2.3 are going to be done to make it the same as an optimized dual core. Also, I don't think stock HTC Sense 2.3 will have much of a visual difference than stock 2.2 Sense. Once the 2.3 update comes out, I'll probably still stick with a custom ROM that is 2.2 until the 2.3 custom ROM's come out.
What I hope that HTC fixes is the GPS issues. The "fix" that is in the development forum (turning off Google Location Services) has worked wonders for me, but I'm hoping HTC just fixes it in a firmware or software update sometime in the future.
ajftl said:
Anyway we're not going to see gingerbread here for at least 4 months
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gb is reportedly hitting thunderbolt in q2!
sent via rooted THUNDERBOLT using Tapatalk
Here is a link to a script that makes your phone smoother and less laggy. It works for all phones and is easy to install. Everything you need is here in this link. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Please tell others what settings worked best for you.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using Tapatalk
This script was not written for high end devices such as this one... Or anything with a dual core CPU... You might see a difference using a single core but this script was written for Ram management on lower end devices and devices with little ram... Using on a 1.5Ghz dualcore phone with 1GB of ram might imo be a waste of time...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Mrperf3ct said:
This script was not written for high end devices such as this one... Or anything with a dual core CPU... You might see a difference using a single core but this script was written for Ram management on lower end devices and devices with little ram... Using on a 1.5Ghz dualcore phone with 1GB of ram might imo be a waste of time...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for letting me know
Sent from my SGH-T839 using Tapatalk
I used to use this on my G2x, my quadrants and all benchmarks JUMPED with it, and worked REALLY well for it. But with the Amaze (I've already used it etc etc) I don't see any difference, the amaze's amount of ram is probably a big contributor to that fact but also probably the version of Android also, as my G2x was running 2.3.3....
hiazn said:
I used to use this on my G2x, my quadrants and all benchmarks JUMPED with it, and worked REALLY well for it. But with the Amaze (I've already used it etc etc) I don't see any difference, the amaze's amount of ram is probably a big contributor to that fact but also probably the version of Android also, as my G2x was running 2.3.3....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the ram and the cpu the g2x is a 1Ghz dualcore we have 1.5Ghz dualcore the g2x only has a couple hundred MBs or ram amaze is 1GB... And that's why u see no improvement...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Mrperf3ct said:
It's the ram and the cpu the g2x is a 1Ghz dualcore we have 1.5Ghz dualcore the g2x only has a couple hundred MBs or ram amaze is 1GB... And that's why u see no improvement...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that's what I said.. hehehe probably not so much the CPU though as the script only modifies ram management.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA Premium App
Mrperf3ct said:
This script was not written for high end devices such as this one... Or anything with a dual core CPU... You might see a difference using a single core but this script was written for Ram management on lower end devices and devices with little ram... Using on a 1.5Ghz dualcore phone with 1GB of ram might imo be a waste of time...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya... explain that to dual core Atrix users...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1257574&highlight=supercharger&page=221
Comments such as "it's pretty mind blowing" probably warrants investigation despite recommendations from people who have never tried it.
Oh... and the lower end device cannot choose this option:
Code:
9. 1000HP Super UnLedded{6,12,200,225,250,300}
Since it's designed for high end devices too, I prevent low end devices from going too over the top
zeppelinrox said:
Ya... explain that to dual core Atrix users...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1257574&highlight=supercharger&page=221
Comments such as "it's pretty mind blowing" probably warrants investigation despite recommendations from people who have never tried it.
Oh... and the lower end device cannot choose this option:
Code:
9. 1000HP Super UnLedded{6,12,200,225,250,300}
Since it's designed for high end devices too, I prevent low end devices from going too over the top
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoa newer version then I have currently, thanks Zep. Hah I don't have that option.. haven't checked for a long while I guess. I'm gonna go try it, yay.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA Premium App
Cool feel free to post your findings
zeppelinrox said:
Ya... explain that to dual core Atrix users...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1257574&highlight=supercharger&page=221
Comments such as "it's pretty mind blowing" probably warrants investigation despite recommendations from people who have never tried it.
Oh... and the lower end device cannot choose this option:
Code:
9. 1000HP Super UnLedded{6,12,200,225,250,300}
Since it's designed for high end devices too, I prevent low end devices from going too over the top
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ay smart guy they don't have a full gig of ram... You will not see any difference in performance on this device and thats why the EVo 3D didn't waste their time on it...
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using xda premium
Doesn't matter.
"Gurus" always say the same thing... last time it was that it won't do anything on a device with 512MB of ram...
How much ram does a SGS II have, smart guy?
Actually, seems the specs are close to this device... so here you go...
Android Spin article... author is using the SGS II
http://androidspin.com/2011/11/02/v6-supercharger-the-android-memory-fixer/
Bookmark it so you can read it whenever your phone lags
It's nice to see that people still don't get the concept of "work smarter, not harder" because it makes it easier for those that do work smarter to get ahead.
My settings don't "stick" after a reboot, and the help file is blank, 0 bytes.
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using XDA App
Did you run the latest update 9 RC3.2?
If not, use that.
Pretty sure that problem doesn't happen anymore with the newest versions.
no, I was using version 8, but I'll give the new one a try. thanks for the reply
Ok cool... there are alot more options so if you're unsure about what an option does, just select it and it will give an explanation before it does anything.
http://www.droid-life.com/2012/11/15/benchmarks-lg-nexus-4-vs-htc-droid-dna/
Anyone else surprised? I thought the difference would be minimal, but the Nexus would be a bit faster due to the smaller resolution and being stock android.
flaring afro said:
http://www.droid-life.com/2012/11/15/benchmarks-lg-nexus-4-vs-htc-droid-dna/
Anyone else surprised? I thought the difference would be minimal, but the Nexus would be a bit faster due to the smaller resolution and being stock android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow I thought the n4 would have gotten better. Seems like a smoother device but wow. Good job HTC!
Sent from my CM9 HTC Thunderbolt from Tapatalk 2.4
Nexus 4 has some crazy thermal throttling oddity I thought I read...could be why.
Maybe the DNA's ram is faster? Otherwise, it should be the same exact hardware going in, performance wise (and rom, but I didn't think the rom speed would affect a benchmark).
EDIT: Or it's probably the throttling if that's true...
is there enough differences in 4.1 and 4.2 to where the benchmarks dont take that into account?
treadwayj said:
is there enough differences in 4.1 and 4.2 to where the benchmarks dont take that into account?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say thats doubtful, the OS was not overhauled by any means. It was basically a security patch with a few framework modifications.
htc is really workin hard to make a comeback
jonesin said:
I'd say thats doubtful, the OS was not overhauled by any means. It was basically a security patch with a few framework modifications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought as much, but i just wanted to play devil's advocate
Does the nexus 4 have 2gb of ram? Because that could explain the difference in scores. I've always been an HTC guy, but honestly, quadrants don't and never will matter. The only way to see how a device really performs is to use it yourself.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I think the HTD DNA has beefed up graphics to handle that large screen, I'll bet that is a part of the difference ...
jasoraso said:
I think the HTD DNA has beefed up graphics to handle that large screen, I'll bet that is a part of the difference ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The adreno GPU is a beast without a doubt
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
ssojyeti2 said:
Does the nexus 4 have 2gb of ram? Because that could explain the difference in scores. I've always been an HTC guy, but honestly, quadrants don't and never will matter. The only way to see how a device really performs is to use it yourself.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep 2gb of ram for the Nexus
jasoraso said:
I think the HTD DNA has beefed up graphics to handle that large screen, I'll bet that is a part of the difference ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, they both have the adreno 320. It is a new beefed up gpu though - twice as fast as the adreno 225 in the GS3 and other dual core s4 processor phones.
ssojyeti2 said:
Does the nexus 4 have 2gb of ram? Because that could explain the difference in scores. I've always been an HTC guy, but honestly, quadrants don't and never will matter. The only way to see how a device really performs is to use it yourself.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They both have 2GB but might not be the same speed - and speed matters more at this point.
Nexus 4 has always benchmarked lower for some reason, it is essentially the same hardware that's inside the optimus G, since the only difference is the O.S may be it is taxing the system a lot more than 4.1, it might not look like much but there is significant difference when it comes to framework on the 4.2, may be it is taxing the system more in the background then 4.1
flaring afro said:
They both have 2GB but might not be the same speed - and speed matters more at this point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok
The reason the Nexus 4 scores lower is because it features thermal throttling which reduced the CPU speed when it reaches a certain temperature to maintain battery efficiency. Stick it in a freezer and the benchmark numbers increase. http://androidandme.com/2012/11/sma...hmark-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-418705
nickmgray said:
The reason the Nexus 4 scores lower is because it features thermal throttling which reduced the CPU speed when it reaches a certain temperature to maintain battery efficiency. Stick it in a freezer and the benchmark numbers increase. http://androidandme.com/2012/11/sma...hmark-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-418705
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. This is the reason. It has been stated on Anandtech. It makes perfect sense. It's all related to both phones using different kernels.
nickmgray said:
The reason the Nexus 4 scores lower is because it features thermal throttling which reduced the CPU speed when it reaches a certain temperature to maintain battery efficiency. Stick it in a freezer and the benchmark numbers increase. http://androidandme.com/2012/11/sma...hmark-showdown/comment-page-1/#comment-418705
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it a feature, or a problem? It's possible the processor is more easily overheating in the Nexus 4 from it's position or something. From the sound of things, the DNA will get as good as or better battery life with 4G off.
It's also possible the software is cutting it off way too early. I once had an Asus gaming laptop that needed a bios update because it throttled the gpu down after it got half the temperature that gpu could take.
HTC always has crazy high benchmarks. It obviously means nothing in day to day performance. My one x scored more than twice as high as my galaxy nexus but the nexus usability wise was smoother.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
In AnTuTu this phone scores almost half of what the Nexus 7 scores in GPU test, though it beats it in everything else.
whoamanwtf said:
In AnTuTu this phone scores almost half of what the Nexus 7 scores in GPU test, though it beats it in everything else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not reliable info. Phones can be modded to do well on benchmarks. Wait till we get our goodies and see what happens
the best phone ever
drwario said:
Not reliable info. Phones can be modded to do well on benchmarks. Wait till we get our goodies and see what happens
the best phone ever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally the mods affect the IO scores, I'm speaking about only the GPU scores.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
The optimus 4x hd is the closest and most comparable to the optimus since it has essentially the same software and is the closest tegra 3 device to the OG.
Per antutus website, the OG beats the 4x HD in total score and GPU. It loses barely to the N7, but that is likely due to butter and software improvements. Assuming both are on the same software, the OG should perform better.
I believe anandtech said Adreno 320 is the best ARM GPU this year minus the iPad's PowerVR GPUs. It is the top android GPU.
Either way, both are great GPUs, but the S4 Pro has a better CPU.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Interesting?
the best phone ever
I'll find that interesting once we can disable the throttling on this thing, cause right now it's not scoring very well throttling so often.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium