[Q] What's the best CPU governor? - Optimus One, P500, V General

And what are the pros and cons of each? Thanks!

smartass is the best i suppose....it saves on your battery and increases your cpu freq. as and when required

sajjan said:
smartass is the best i suppose....it saves on your battery and increases your cpu freq. as and when required
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smartass and savagedzen do their job almost the same but savagedzen is better. Thats for me. Don't know for others.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App

What's the difference then...in performance or battery it what?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

If you look they the threads this has already been discussed the answers are there just search the site
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App

i use smartass. i have good battery life with it.

Related

Is ondemand governor really unstable?

In cm7 the default governor is ondemand but it used to be said that this was unstable so use conservative
I don't really tell a difference anyone?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Alanrocks15 said:
In cm7 the default governor is ondemand but it used to be said that this was unstable so use conservative
I don't really tell a difference anyone?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i always use performence or powersave...conservative is good bro..but ive think on demand is not good

Faux kernel - schedulers?

Before anyone starts i cannot find a definitive answer.
What are these and how do they work?
And which is the most appropriate for a) battery life and b) performance?
I use faux123's latest kernel
Thanks
Faux himself has said many times that nvidia chipset does not allow schedulers to run because it is set to performance by default and any others added do not have any effect on battery savings, etc. I would provide a reference, but i do not remember the exact thread.
Edit: read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sho...](026/024/026)OC~1.45GHz/UV/SLQB/ZRAM[Jun-17]
Sent from my MB860 on CM7.2.0 Stable
Soldier-2Point0 said:
Faux himself has said many times that nvidia chipset does not allow schedulers to run because it is set to performance by default and any others added do not have any effect on battery savings, etc. I would provide a reference, but i do not remember the exact thread.
Edit: read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sho...](026/024/026)OC~1.45GHz/UV/SLQB/ZRAM[Jun-17]
Sent from my MB860 on CM7.2.0 Stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is talking about scheduler not the governor.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
dragon430 said:
He is talking about scheduler not the governor.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disregard my comment.
Search google for the different schedulers. There are explainations of every one of them and what they do, somewhere in Xda.
Search and google are your friends.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
admanirv said:
Before anyone starts i cannot find a definitive answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You obviously didn't search very hard because I had the same questions a few months ago and I found the answer fairly easily.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
d3athsd00r said:
You obviously didn't search very hard because I had the same questions a few months ago and I found the answer fairly easily.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im agree with you. Btw, noop is the best schedulers...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

[Q] I/O Scheduler - NOOP or SIO ?

[Q] I/O Scheduler - NOOP or SIO ? I know there has been speculation that this is a negligible difference in overall efficiency, but I have been on SIO and it seems less efficient than NOOP ? Is this something anyone else has experienced ?
imilleson said:
[Q] I/O Scheduler - NOOP or SIO ? I know there has been speculation that this is a negligible difference in overall efficiency, but I have been on SIO and it seems less efficient than NOOP ? Is this something anyone else has experienced ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NOOP is ideal for solid state devices, like SSD, RAM drives, phones, tablets. Not so good for traditional disk drives.
Having said that I wonder if the difference is noticeable without benchmarking..
---
If crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight? (via Tapatalk)
Check this out:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1420742
sooo then... which one should i use on the vibrant?
Hobbesfed said:
sooo then... which one should i use on the vibrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally like simple the best on the vibrant is recommend that one but both are similar. Just pick one really
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Simple is my scheduler of choice also
My kernel doesn't have that governor
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
imilleson said:
My kernel doesn't have that governor
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel are you using?
Subzero. It has like 10 options but I don't think that is one of them
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
imilleson said:
Subzero. It has like 10 options but I don't think that is one of them
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Subzero definitely has simple
It's named "Sio"
Oh lol right . I like sio
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
I using sio but what happen if choose noop?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
iskandarizzz said:
I using sio but what happen if choose noop?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may or may not increase performance and battery
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
iskandarizzz said:
I using sio but what happen if choose noop?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, I doubt you'd notice a huge difference...unless you're very taxing on your phone, or already super familiar with how it runs lol
Which I am both. I use my phone at least 2 hours of solid screen on time a day and I have flashed somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 different ROMs. I like to experiment. I think sio and noop are very similar but I can't quite figure out which one is better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
nvm
I prefer sio, it based on deadline

Cpu control...!

Does governor and I/O scheduler settings have impact on battery...??
Sent from my MT11i using xda app-developers app
jaswanthjasti said:
Does governor and I/O scheduler settings have impact on battery...??
Sent from my MT11i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes because they are controling the cpu frequences
You have a thanks button and don't know what to do with it? ...
Just press it
demolatorul said:
Yes because they are controling the cpu frequences
You have a thanks button and don't know what to do with it? ...
Just press it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the recommend settings for 1.performamce 2.battery efficient
Sent from my MT11i using xda app-developers app
jaswanthjasti said:
What are the recommend settings for 1.performamce 2.battery efficient
Sent from my MT11i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For perfomance Ondemand is pretty good...
SmartassV2 is good as battery efficient governor...
But I think the best way find is doing it in your own...
Read this thread. It is pretty informative....
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817

CyanogenMod 10.1

Hello everyone. So basically i have a question. Is anyone facing lags on cm 10.1 new nightlies? O have a lot of time with this rom, and i must say that 10.0 was much more smoother (at least for me)
On 10.1 even the homepage is choppy... I'm running Pegasusq overclocked 1.7 GHz with deadline scheduler... any advice you would give me?
Best regards
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
DarkSofter said:
Hello everyone. So basically i have a question. Is anyone facing lags on cm 10.1 new nightlies? O have a lot of time with this rom, and i must say that 10.0 was much more smoother (at least for me)
On 10.1 even the homepage is choppy... I'm running Pegasusq overclocked 1.7 GHz with deadline scheduler... any advice you would give me?
Best regards
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I felt the latest PA ROM was quite laggy too...
Use Siyah kernel and I have a few tips for settings:
--Over clock to 1.5GHz
--use lulzactiveq
--turn gentle fair sleepers off
--set touch boost to 1000Mhz (or more if you want)
--turn android logger off
I also undervolt all frequencies by 75mv.... I do a lot of PC tweaking and you'd be surprised how much that little amount can reduce cpu temps.
Hope it helps. Did for me.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
kickassdave said:
I felt the latest PA ROM was quite laggy too...
Use Siyah kernel and I have a few tips for settings:
--Over clock to 1.5GHz
--use lulzactiveq
--turn gentle fair sleepers off
--set touch boost to 1000Mhz (or more if you want)
--turn android logger off
I also undervolt all frequencies by 75mv.... I do a lot of PC tweaking and you'd be surprised how much that little amount can reduce cpu temps.
Hope it helps. Did for me.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May i ask how's your battery life with this tweaks?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
DarkSofter said:
May i ask how's your battery life with this tweaks?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't really noticeably different to stock settings tbh.. (I.e. still not a patch on Samsung). Give it a go and see how you get on. It definitely makes the ROM smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
kickassdave said:
It isn't really noticeably different to stock settings tbh.. (I.e. still not a patch on Samsung). Give it a go and see how you get on. It definitely makes the ROM smoother.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That means better than a normal cm 10.1 (sigh)
I did the things you told me, except the undervolting, and gotta admit it's better... Thank you very much
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
the undervolting will help with the battery life
Glebun said:
the undervolting will help with the battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i know but it's not very noticable, and I'm not a big fan of it, last time i did it -50 i got my phone restarting frequently
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
DarkSofter said:
Yes i know but it's not very noticable, and I'm not a big fan of it, last time i did it -50 i got my phone restarting frequently
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out here for more settings
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2071967
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Try use "Seeder" app
xanthrax said:
Check out here for more settings
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2071967
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you ill look into it
MrxSiN said:
Try use "Seeder" app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it worth?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
MrxSiN said:
Try use "Seeder" app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have read comments from several devs that claim that this makes no difference and that those saying it does are experiencing the placebo effect
Addition: in case you are experiencing scrolling lag in any apps, make sure you have force GPU rendering ticked in developer options!! Absolute necessity in any JellyBean ROM.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources