[Q] Whats different between jvp and jvq roms - Vibrant Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Whats improved on gb jvq roms and what makes them better from jvp roms?
Are they faster? Improved? More conservative on battery? or are they just based on a new gingerbread leak?

Since I flashed JVQ my my battery seems better than JVP and it seems faster and less laggy
Its just been improved overall I think
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

All of the above. They are faster, better, and better on batter life. Why? Because they are based on a new GB leak.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

thanks guys

Related

Looking for a set up suggestion.

Hi I just got a free used vibrant. I'm gonna use it as a back up phone. My primary is a Galaxy S 4G, running ICBINB. It's extremely smooth and stable with great battery life. I'm hoping someone can suggest a ROM for the Galaxy S Vibrant that's considered extremely stable and smooth with great battery life. I'm not really concerned about quadrant scores, just want stability and smoothness with lagfix like my 4G running ICBINB. Thanks.
Try project v with bali kernal
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Revamped/miui with Neo 9
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
cm7 with neo 9 v5 and kb5 modem
Try ZenDroid. Very fast and stable with excellent battery life.
Sent from my GingerZen Vibrant using XDA Premium App
Lol this is a spamfest but...CM7. End of story.
And the Vibrant is actually a better device (with much more ROM/dev support) than your GalaxyS 4G unless you are concerned about the data network.
Bi-winng V3, zero issues, very fast and stable. Kernel has overclock ability. Dev is super nice guy and it has great support.
Almost all the froyo roms are perfectly stable and fast with great batt life... gingerbread isnt incredibly stable but its FAST and cm7 is great but youll have to deal with lack of gps and batt drain, so i suggesr froyo roms like bionix 1.3.1 or project v5
Sent from a cell tower to the XDA server to you.
Anyone suggesting Gingerbread is leading you astray per your criteria.
Honestly, Trigger (2.2.. not the one based on CM7) would be my suggestion, or Project-V.
Thanks for all the suggestions! I will definitely go with one of the froyo roms, Thanks again!
I also used project v with bali kernal and was very happy.
Currently running GingerZen_RC3. I am having some issues with the GPS, but I'm will ing to make that sacrifice. No other issues at all with GingerZen.
vibrant 3g>gs4g
Osolot said:
I also used project v with bali kernal and was very happy.
Currently running GingerZen_RC3. I am having some issues with the GPS, but I'm will ing to make that sacrifice. No other issues at all with GingerZen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how is that rom?
GingerZen is pretty nice, but Dev On Hold until a JVR kernel is out
Can someone confirm a working gps on revamped, project v, or trigger 2.3?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Which CM Kernal focuses on Battery life better than stock?

Like the title says, which Gingerbread kernal gives better battery life than the stock ones that Cyanogenmod has? I'm currently on Trigger 0822 build
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

[Q] Best ROM and Kernal for battery life that is stable

Any suggestions for a stable rom and kernel for battery life? I need everything to work so probably need to stick with gingerbread. Thanks!!
Stock EH03. I've done a decent amount of reading about this topic and from what I understand RFS (default galaxy s file system, versus ext4 or mtd) consumes the least amount of power. Also, performance in EH03 is noticeably improved compared to the Froyo or Eclair builds on my device. Combined with full functionality I'd say its your best bet, unless you want to buy an extended battery.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
If you didn't have to stick with gingerbread a dj05 ROM is far superior in battery life imho..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
If you didn't have to stick with gingerbread a dj05 ROM is far superior in battery life imho..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't find a dl zip for dj05. Would it work well with ICS?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Ics provides the best battery for me. I usually try to beat my gnexus battery. Its easy
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App

CM9 vs FoxHound v2 - Battery Life

Iv tried both ROMs. I feel CM9 runs down the battery faster. Could it be a calibration thing? Can anyone confirm or deny my observation?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

CM9

Hi guys, I just want your opinion on our CM9 build. I checked and the average quadrant score on CM9 is generally lower than CM7 by about 300 points while overclocked to the same clock speed. I know quadrant isn't much but I feel it as well and ICS just feels less smooth than the gingerbread roms although it's supposed t be lighter. Can someone please explain? Is it a problem with ICS or CM9? If our AOSP rom develops do you think it will be smoother?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
The performance is great imo. But it's too buggy for the avarage power user and it literally fried my battery xD
If you want looks, use CM9.
If you want performance, use Cm7.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
OK Thanks guys
Closed.

Categories

Resources