Coming from the Evo 4G, i saw a tremendous improvement in battery life going from stock to rom with netarchy-toastmod sbc-havs-more-cfs, no set cpu. Just the kernel alone was giving me about 25-50% more battery life easy, in alot of cases more. I went from needing to charge after 12-14 hours to needing to charge after 18-28 hours.
So what is the best kernel for the 3VO? Whats going to increase my battery life the most?
Am i going to have to go with a combination of kernel/setcpu (undervolt, underclock) to see an improvement?
I haven't found any kernel yet that gives me battery life like stock. However, my phone is always getting plugged in and unplugged all day when working on my ROM so I haven't had much time to fully test it and do a battery calibration. I would try the test SBC kernel located I'm General. I'm running that right now, always loved SBC.
As far as ROMs go, mine gets pretty good battery life. 19+ hours of usage on stock kernel with moderate use. Plus, the OC daemon is wonderful with the script I wrote for it.
i use gb sense has the most features
viperRom, the included daemon that controls the cpu clock speed is amazing here is some info on it.
-viperboy- said:
OC Daemon
The OC daemon was created by rmk40 of Team Unity. I take no credit for the daemon, only the script I made to make it easier to work with. More information can be found here, but I will sum it up and explain the script below...
This daemon, written in C, completely eliminates the need for SetCPU and other CPU controlling apps. The daemon handles min/max frequencies for both screen on and screen off but it has one more trick up its sleeve... It can change the governor INSTANTLY depending on the screen state. I have tested it and I can tell you that it really does work instantly and I think this is going to be a great battery saver! I have set default values within the ROM as follows: Screen Off - conservative @ 192min/486max and Screen On - ondemand @ 192min/1188max. Using these settings, I get NO lag. Battery life is amazing, over 19+ hours for me with moderate usage! See for yourself...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a link to the Rom
Thanks ill check out your rom, is it possible to add the oc daemon/script to my current rom, or is that something that has to be cooked in?
Been running Viper's Rom today, and 6hours into it, I have 65% Battery left. I'd say it is working well under moderate use and living in the sticks.
Im currently running a stripped down version of the stock rom , all bloat has been removed as well as a considerable amount of sense . That in itself improved battery life slightly .......I said slightly lol . Today is gonna be the first day with Netarchy's Silverneedle . As time progresses kernals will advance and become easier on the battery . Setcpu also gave a slight boost to battery life with a screen off profile as well . The current SBC kernel is based off Net's kernel but MS is still doing the adjustments to get the charging routine optimal . Much like his work in the 4G it took some tinkering to get it to be one of the crown jewels in the Evo 4G's bag of tricks . I have no doubt that once he is done with the adjustments it will be just as good for the 3D . The 3D has pretty good life out of the box with all things considered . Once the refining of kernals and roms gets to the sweet spot I feel you will easily see this phone last a day without an extended battery .
Viper gets my vote.
davec1234 said:
Viper gets my vote.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I also updated the the daemon and some governor settings in a flashable .zip in my thread that will improve battery life even more!
-viperboy- said:
Thanks! I also updated the the daemon and some governor settings in a flashable .zip in my thread that will improve battery life even more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is it possible for me to install the daemon/script outside of an entire rom, aka can i install it on what im using now? Just dont have the time to wipe/flash/restore right now. Soon ill give your rom a try.
Eat it iPhone said:
So is it possible for me to install the daemon/script outside of an entire rom, aka can i install it on what im using now? Just dont have the time to wipe/flash/restore right now. Soon ill give your rom a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will only work with my ROM. If you're on it, head to the 3rd post and click where it says init.d.
-viperboy- said:
Thanks! I also updated the the daemon and some governor settings in a flashable .zip in my thread that will improve battery life even more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was on it minutes after you posted it
Related
I know there is a lot of kernel / Rom combos out there now, so I'm wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a good one that would give me pretty decent battery life. I'm currently using times_infinity's kernel with superclean rom. The battery life is meh at best imo; great speed however.
Anyone have some suggestions?
Thanks,
Kal
This is a very subjective question. Results vary from device to device. The best thing to do is experiment yourself. There's no harm in asking I guess but you will more than likely find out that what one person experiences is different from what another person experiences.
Also, two more things: 1) You are posting this in the wrong forum. Try General. 2) There are lots posts on this already.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
I hear good things about sc 2.9.2 with times_infinity's comavolt kernel.
Ask your questions in Q&A next time. Not only is it a rule but you'll also get a lot more responses.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Y u no post in right section?
Will you get out of the dev forum?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Many people have had success with the comavolt kernel or pbjt UV 100 with nameless v3. I read a report of 30 hours.
Keep in mind tho you cannot have everything. There will always be a reaction to every action. More speed less life or more life less speed.
suppliesidejesus said:
Y u no post in right section?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha plus one
I thought you had to have so many posts before you could post in the dev section?
FTFY
suppliesidejesus said:
Y u no post in right section?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FTFY
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Any ron and any kernel will give you about the same battery life....... there's never a massive difference. If you don't care about performance any simple UV kernel is fine. I am running of kernel 1.3 ghz and battery is the same.
My bad for posting in this area, I thought I was in general.
As for performance, that really is not a HUGE deal for me, pretty much anything is a upgrade from the stock crap USCC put out...
As it stands now, phone being completely idle without any involvement from me whatsoever, i'm losing about 5% battery life per hour; which doesn't seem very normal?
Since this thread will probably get moved to Q&A, I'll just reply here instead of starting a new thread on more or less the same subject.
Anyway, can anyone shed any light on why there's such a difference in battery life between 2.2 and what we're were able to get on 2.1?
On DJ05/DL09, using JT's 1/23 undervolted kernel and a stock debloated rom, I was getting upwards of 72 hours on a charge. Now, on again, a stock but debloated rom, I struggle to get 24 hours on any of the currently available undervolted kernels. Why the difference?
I don't appear to be seeing any battery-life benefit from the latest kernels. On the stock EB01, I has been getting pretty much the same 24 hours. Now, with undervolted kernels and underclocked to 800mhz max, I'm still getting about 24 hours. I really miss getting 3 days per charge and not having to worry about toting a charger around with me just to get through a day.
I would suggest any undervolted kernel with any rom (possibly Superclean 2.9.2).
Use Set CPU and change max frequency to 800MHz from 1000MHz as you wont find much difference in performance.
Superclean and underclocked eb01 to 800mhz
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
ChrisDDD said:
Since this thread will probably get moved to Q&A, I'll just reply here instead of starting a new thread on more or less the same subject.
Anyway, can anyone shed any light on why there's such a difference in battery life between 2.2 and what we're were able to get on 2.1?
On DJ05/DL09, using JT's 1/23 undervolted kernel and a stock debloated rom, I was getting upwards of 72 hours on a charge. Now, on again, a stock but debloated rom, I struggle to get 24 hours on any of the currently available undervolted kernels. Why the difference?
I don't appear to be seeing any battery-life benefit from the latest kernels. On the stock EB01, I has been getting pretty much the same 24 hours. Now, with undervolted kernels and underclocked to 800mhz max, I'm still getting about 24 hours. I really miss getting 3 days per charge and not having to worry about toting a charger around with me just to get through a day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is kind of exactly what I was getting it. My battery life seems horrid going to 2.2. Curious, what app are you using to monitor battery life?
I had the same experience going from stock and dj05 to super clean. Right out of the box I had 40 hours of moderate usage, and dj05 was at 40% after two days of moderate usage.
Now with sc2.9.2 with jt's ec10 kernel and eb01 radio, I get 13 hours with losing more battery while in sleep.
Yea, I'm really close to going back to 2.1 DJ05/DL09. On 2.2, I had been holding out for kernel source to be available so the devs could put together undervolted kernels. But now that that's happened, and not only am I not seeing any improvement, but I'm now underclocking just to make it through 24 hours, it just doesn't seem worth staying on 2.2.
For example, I started this morning with a full charge. I've made or received two phone calls, totaling 16 minutes. I've checked my e-mail a few times, and I VNC'd into a computer for no more than 2 to 3 minutes. I'm now at 32% remaining after 13.5 hours. At that rate, it'll be stone dead by 20 hours. And to get this, I have it clocked down to 800mhz, and 200mhz max when the screen is off.
I had been getting a solid 24 hours on the previous stock kernels - not undervolted and not underclocked. What gives?
Screw it, I'm flashing back to 2.1.
Less than 3 hours, my phone sat, unused, screen off, clocked down to 200mhz, and the battery lost another 15%. Complete nonsense. In no possible way is FroYo worth this.
More than 5% per hour, on an idle phone, on an undervolted kernel and underclocked down to 200mhz.
Still trying to figure this out
Hey guys; I've read lots but I'm not really getting a couple of things. First, I don't actually know what I have (except that it's Froyo 2.2.1) because I did do a full flash using SC or some equivalent so I'm going to post what I have. My question is: what could I change with this setup (which is running fine) to improve battery performance? From what I'm reading, I probably only need to update a kernel or something. Please advise; what would you change about this set-up to try to get more batter life on a VZW Samsung Fascinate:
H/W: I500.04
F/W: 2.2.1
Baseband: S: i500.04 V.EB01
Kernel: 2.6.32.9
Build: SCH-I500.EB01
... about two weeks ago and I love it so far, best phone I've ever owned hands down. The only problem I've experienced is the battery... for example after a full charge, I surfed the web non stop on 4g (hspa) for an hour and 30 minutes and my battery is already down to 65%. Is this normal? My brightness wasn't even high, it was slightly less than half... seems kinda weak considering just about everyone says this phone has the best battery life of all high end Androids.
I'm on 2.3.6
My kernel version is 2.6.35.7
My build number is GINGERBREAD.UCKK6
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Hour and a half of screen on time, not to mention data consumption, yeah that's about right. It's all based on how much you use the phone. Here's a screenshot of my battery life:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Light use
Miui 2.1.6
Siyah 2.6.6i kernel
Supercharger V6 1000hp script
I average 20hrs of battery life, this was just a test to see how good the battery is.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
It may be some other stuff as well. Look in the link below to see if you have any of the known battery drainers. I was suprised at what was causing a lot of my battery drain and after deleting the offending apps/services, I'm getting great battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1308030
2.3.6 on the GS2 has known battery life issues. You can Google "2.3.6 battery life issues" to find links that I'm unable to post here. When originally on 2.3.4, I experienced great battery life - on par with my old iPhone 4. When I upgraded to 2.3.6, battery life was significantly reduced whenever I was connected to wifi (battery drained with the screen off as though I was actively browsing on it).
I concur with what audiotweaker states. You can always go back to a 2.3.4 kernel, easiest way is bundled with a ROM that currently loads that kernel.
jermneedscoffee said:
I concur with what audiotweaker states. You can always go back to a 2.3.4 kernel, easiest way is bundled with a ROM that currently loads that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um, kernel has NOTHING to do with it. UCKK6 or UCKH7, they all use a 2.6.35.x kernel. Changing the kernel will do NOTHING to change the drain - it's a problem somewhere in the system image, not the kernel.
I did a simple root without any custom ROM using this method: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1311081
I had auto upgraded to 2.3.6 from 2.3.4. Using the method in that thread will root your phone + downgrade the OS back to stock 2.3.4.
I am having better battery life since then because of
- ability to better optimize the battery after rooting (Titanium bkp, access to Alarms log through BetterBatteryStats, ability to disable auto start of certain tasks using Super Manager, etc)
- OS 2.3.4 instead of 2.3.6
- misc other battery optimization techniques floating around on xda
Technically, 2.3.6 in general isn't the problem - it's the UCKK6 build specifically.
I don't think the I9100 2.3.6 bases have as many issues - BTHID still broken, but at least it seems like they have less drain issues.
Entropy512 said:
Technically, 2.3.6 in general isn't the problem - it's the UCKK6 build specifically.
I don't think the I9100 2.3.6 bases have as many issues - BTHID still broken, but at least it seems like they have less drain issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(This was about the first week when I got the phone before I rooted)
I actually was able to talk to a few people at my local AT&T retail store. A few of my friends actually work there as well. I was talking to them about the battery life and they told me it wasn't actually 2.3.6, it was the build that comes with the phone (factory).
Then I got home, flashed a CFW. Battery now lasts about 2 days with just basic web browsing and texting.
Hey guys! Just wondering, if any anyone has heard something about an app, which lets me change the CPU mode, from Quad-, to tripple-, dual-, or singlecore mode...
I haven't found any, yet. (Yes, I have used the invention, called "Google" and consorts)
Thanks in advance for good answers!
BTW: If you are interested why: My battery lasts about 3-4 hours.... -.-
I'll post a screenshot in a moment. I constantly recharge, but not for long, because I am constantly occupied with all sorts of stuff, so it may seen like the batery life is good, on some parts of the graph...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
The system's scheduler, pegasusq, automatically powers down cores when they are not needed.
Reducing the core count has an adverse effect since they need higher clock speeds to compensate and thus require more power.
Your issue most likely is data network and/or apps misbehaving.
Please install BetterBatteryStats (free APK here in XDA) and show it's output after such a 4-5hour cycle.
Did you by any chance disable Fast Dormancy or have you checked if your provider supports it?
d4fseeker said:
The system's scheduler, pegasusq, automatically powers down cores when they are not needed.
Reducing the core count has an adverse effect since they need higher clock speeds to compensate and thus require more power.
Your issue most likely is data network and/or apps misbehaving.
Please install BetterBatteryStats (free APK here in XDA) and show it's output after such a 4-5hour cycle.
Did you by any chance disable Fast Dormancy or have you checked if your provider supports it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, Fast dormancy is enabled. I'm not yet all to used to the S III, but from my knowledge of my old Nexus, I'd say it's an app, like you also said. But I close my apps, I'll post a better stat, tommorrow. Then hopefully we'll get some results. If not better, I'll go completely stock, just with root...
No, Fast dormancy is enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the RRC statemachine actually go to IDLE and remain there for several seconds without going to active again? (Well except if there is data traffic)
Or does it regularly go back to an active state (e.g. every 5 seconds)
I'll go completely stock, just with root...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which ROM are you on?
CM9 (and afaik all other AOSP/AOKP-based ROM's) has a huge battery drain and other network-related issues (such as powering down the modem every other time)
Samsung-based ROM's should be fine
d4fseeker said:
Does the RRC statemachine actually go to IDLE and remain there for several seconds without going to active again? (Well except if there is data traffic)
Or does it regularly go back to an active state (e.g. every 5 seconds)
Which ROM are you on?
CM9 (and afaik all other AOSP/AOKP-based ROM's) has a huge battery drain and other network-related issues (such as powering down the modem every other time)
Samsung-based ROM's should be fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What huge battery drain are you talking about? I get awesome battery life on CM9.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
joshnichols189 said:
What huge battery drain are you talking about? I get awesome battery life on CM9.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously battery life depends on the user and apps running, just cause it works for you doesn't mean it will for someone else.
theking_13 said:
Obviously battery life depends on the user and apps running, just cause it works for you doesn't mean it will for someone else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are pathetic. If you bothered to read, the post I quoted implied it was a widespread issue.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
almost all apps can handle single core operation @ 1.4 ghz, so disabling cores will save you some battery. afaik you need a supporting kernel to achieve this. Im using siyah along with extweaks app, there you can select the number cores to use.
Is this what you're looking for? http://tinyurl.com/77fudrr
I am coming from MeanRom, which was fabulous.
MeanBean is very good too, but my battery life is miserable now. Looking in the battery stats the only thing that looks unusual is the Internet (meaning the browser app) is at 36 percent of the total battery usage.
Is anyone else getting miserable battery life, and what is your internet usage reading?
ronnienyc said:
I am coming from MeanRom, which was fabulous.
MeanBean is very good too, but my battery life is miserable now. Looking in the battery stats the only thing that looks unusual is the Internet (meaning the browser app) is at 36 percent of the total battery usage.
Is anyone else getting miserable battery life, and what is your internet usage reading?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on MeanBean .5 and my battery life, albeit not better than MeanRom, is not that bad. My internet usage reading is 8%. I usually don't leave my 3G/WiFi on all day and I only turn it on when I want to check something or get a MMS. I guess that's why my battery life isn't nearly as bad as yours on MeanBean.
So sounds like your battery life is about the same? Are you using the new kernel or the old one?
Yeah I would make that assumption. I'm using whichever kernel Mikey included in the Rom, which I'm assuming is the JB kernel because the ICS kernel won't work. I try to stay away from other kernels because the kernel Mikey includes in his Roms is usually tweaked to work specifically for his Roms.
Disable Google now, don't fill up every home screen with widgets, reboot and give the kernel a day to settle. That should improve your battery life to almost ics levels
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I don't use Google Now, nor do I use any widgets other than weather. Hmmm...
Anyway if Google Now was the problem where would that show under battery usage statistics? Anyone know?
Thanks
Something else to keep in mind is that MeanROM included Mikey's custom kernel, which was a big contribution to the fantastic battery life.
Swiped from my EVO
I was not using the custom kernel, and even so the battery went forever and ever
ronnienyc said:
I was not using the custom kernel, and even so the battery went forever and ever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mean bean .5 here,getting -30min/1hr less when browsing & using camera which isn't to bad for an early jb release. I could live with it for now since I still don't have to bring my charger to work with me. It isn't that bad IMO
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
I got over 11 hours today and I thought that was not too bad. There are some strange items showing up in usage though using data. Anyone know what they are? Droid Wall does not log in JB so it is hard for me to pin down.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mikee4fun said:
I got over 11 hours today and I thought that was not too bad. There are some strange items showing up in usage though using data. Anyone know what they are? Droid Wall does not log in JB so it is hard for me to pin down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just looked through several theme and ROM threads and couldn't find it. Where did you get your icons from? They're pretty sweet.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
You've also got to take into account that the rom needs to settle, its a brand new base and Mikeys tweaks have yet to be fully set up. The tweaks in Mean ICS were developed over time
banccalif said:
You've also got to take into account that the rom needs to settle, its a brand new base and Mikeys tweaks have yet to be fully set up. The tweaks in Mean ICS were developed over time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1:good:
slowfncar said:
Mean bean .5 here,getting -30min/1hr less when browsing & using camera which isn't to bad for an early jb release. I could live with it for now since I still don't have to bring my charger to work with me. It isn't that bad IMO
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed
Sent from my EVO
Quis89 said:
I just looked through several theme and ROM threads and couldn't find it. Where did you get your icons from? They're pretty sweet.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your not going to find them as I made them myself. You have to look for a DINIK glass template floating on XDA and then use Photoshop to be creative. =)
ronnienyc said:
I don't use Google Now, nor do I use any widgets other than weather. Hmmm...
Anyway if Google Now was the problem where would that show under battery usage statistics? Anyone know?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maps
banccalif said:
You've also got to take into account that the rom needs to settle, its a brand new base and Mikeys tweaks have yet to be fully set up. The tweaks in Mean ICS were developed over time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And yet it's still currently better than the officially released version
Mikee4fun said:
Your not going to find them as I made them myself. You have to look for a DINIK glass template floating on XDA and then use Photoshop to be creative. =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or you could share...
Someone on another forum suggested turning off location history in maps helped a lot with their battery life...
And someone else suggested a simple factory reset after flashing the ROM...(I know this helped out with a previous phone I had - it was burning battery like cray and running hot, and factory reset cured everything.)
I thought the batter life was much better with Meanbean
Ever since I switched to using custom ROMs, the phone's battery usage seems to be significantly affected. I initially used AICP, the battery life was pretty good. But then I flashed Temasek's CM13, followed by Ressurection Remix. Since I started using these 2 ROMs the battery seems to be draining even when the phone is idle for a while. Anyway, please comment about the battery life of the ROMs you all are using, it'll help me choose a ROM. Thanks in advance!
Colour os for me!
Colour os rom seemed to me the best battery runner!
does it have the CM theme engine?
Sactgr said:
Colour os rom seemed to me the best battery runner!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am a big fan of themes :3
I have been using cm13 by ashwin6t4 for about a month and can say the battery life is the best i get double of what i used to get on oxygen os.
sam0056 said:
I have been using cm13 by ashwin6t4 for about a month and can say the battery life is the best i get double of what i used to get on oxygen os.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R u using any exposed modules like greenify,amplify?
I don't know anything about Xposed, can you please tell me about it
maddy1325 said:
R u using any exposed modules like greenify,amplify?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and how do I install it?
No ROM has ever given me more than about 2,5 hr SOT. I guess OnePlus X battery is quite bad. Only way I crossed 3 hours was watching youtube from 100% full time.
syl0n said:
No ROM has ever given me more than about 2,5 hr SOT. I guess OnePlus X battery is quite bad. Only way I crossed 3 hours was watching youtube from 100% full time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is something wrong with your battery or the way you use your phone.
All ROMs had given me more than 3.5/4 hours SoT, the stock ROM is about 4:10, cm-13 about the same, purity ROM gives the best battery life, I managed to have almost 5:30h, but the average is 4:30. I´m going to try temasek´s ROM and see if it´s good.
I would say just stating SoT without describing usage pattern and usage screenshot is not really wise.
There are times I get 7hrs of SoT as well as 2.5hrs SoT.
It all boils down to what you are using your phone for along with what tweaks you have implemented.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
I get a SOT of 5h+ on OOS with blu spark kernel...
Dead Cookies leave no trails...
---------- Post added at 16:14 ---------- Previous post was at 16:12 ----------
Forgot to add screeshot
Dead Cookies leave no trails...
Forgot to add screeshot
Dead Cookies leave no trails...[/QUOTE]
Nops!
meraj99 said:
I am a big fan of themes :3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It dosent support cm theme engine, but you can download all the themes from its store, but offcourse u will have to tackle that chinese language?
Rishi. said:
I would say just stating SoT without describing usage pattern and usage screenshot is not really wise.
There are times I get 7hrs of SoT as well as 2.5hrs SoT.
It all boils down to what you are using your phone for along with what tweaks you have implemented.
View attachment 3707180
View attachment 3707181
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Just updated to OOS 2.2.1 and I can say that the battery usage is much improved. Had to unroot, change from blu spark kernel to stock kernel on 2.2.0-x for updating. Battery life on stock kernel is as good, if not better than blu spark.....
Dead Cookies leave no trails...
H2o
bro you can hydrogen os ,.., It is the best bettary support for me so far ,.,,
Haven't got the update on my OPX.
Have the phone for a week now and battery life is really Bad.
Is there much improvement with the update ? (2.2.1)
Bttery seems to be more or less the same on all roms, what makes most of the difference is kernel...
btw does anyone use another rom (except oxygen) that has working noise cancellation mic? Because i see people in many threads saying there are complaints of noise when in calls...
migueldbr said:
Bttery seems to be more or less the same on all roms, what makes most of the difference is kernel...
btw does anyone use another rom (except oxygen) that has working noise cancellation mic? Because i see people in many threads saying there are complaints of noise when in calls...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I concur. In my opinion the kernel is more important than the ROM you are using.
Bluspark is also my choice.
So, to get a better batterylife you have to flash that kernel ?