Related
Hi I have found the way to port ICS to the galaxy players. :
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
The problem is that I can't find the binaries for the galaxy player. Where I can find them?
arent they located in /system/bin?
Need root first though
(I would help out with this, but dont really know how to do it, and i dont have the player yet)
zaclimon said:
Hi I have found the way to port ICS to the galaxy players. :
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
The problem is that I can't find the binaries for the galaxy player. Where I can find them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will this actually boot and run? If it's that "easy", then why don't more devices have ICS? If you can extract the binaries and cook up a rom, I would be happy to test it . Also, if I have time later this week, I'll try to follow those instructions and then post my results. If everything works on the first try, I'll be very surprised but not at all dissapointed . Thanks for sharing this
Dyskmaster said:
Will this actually boot and run? If it's that "easy", then why don't more devices have ICS? If you can extract the binaries and cook up a rom, I would be happy to test it . Also, if I have time later this week, I'll try to follow those instructions and then post my results. If everything works on the first try, I'll be very surprised but not at all dissapointed . Thanks for sharing this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well maybe because people don't know how to do it. And as for the current rom the major problem is the hardware acceleration and the camera. Maybe We can find it (The binairies) at opensource.samsung.com
It should be easier than phones because you don't have to worry about not screwing with voice, data, and stuff like that. Just get it on and get all the apps working correctly. Radios are always the hardest.
I've also been triyng to compile the source for the player but i wasnt able to do so, the thing is that the source compiles fine with the pre-adjustments it comes with, i mean the androidboard.mk ( i think thats the name of the file not sure), but when i changed the variables for a armv5 build, which is the core of the device and the ones that comes in the same file on the opensource.samsung soource, it just doesnt compile and throws some kind of errors about some libraries that i didnt touched. i dont know what i had been doing wrong.
I Also found this video in which they show whats in every folder, and how to build and add packages from source to the build:
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
This is a detail process description from the official android site to build from source, very similar like the one zaclimon found:
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
The source from samsung doesnt have all the drivers, just the alsa audio driver, i guess we gonna have to find a way to get the binaries like cyanogen did, maybe get some scripts they use and try to do it ourselves:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Sa...le_CyanogenMod_(Linux)#Copy_proprietary_files
it is done through the adb, but the thing is to get those files, maybe we could ask that fellow some help for this step, since he has the experience.
sodomywar said:
I've also been triyng to compile the source for the player but i wasnt able to do so, the thing is that the source compiles fine with the pre-adjustments it comes with, i mean the androidboard.mk ( i think thats the name of the file not sure), but when i changed the variables for a armv5 build, which is the core of the device and the ones that comes in the same file on the opensource.samsung soource, it just doesnt compile and throws some kind of errors about some libraries that i didnt touched. i dont know what i had been doing wrong.
I Also found this video in which they show whats in every folder, and how to build and add packages from source to the build:
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
This is a detail process description from the official android site to build from source, very similar like the one zaclimon found:
http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
The source from samsung doesnt have all the drivers, just the alsa audio driver, i guess we gonna have to find a way to get the binaries like cyanogen did, maybe get some scripts they use and try to do it ourselves:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Sa...le_CyanogenMod_(Linux)#Copy_proprietary_files
it is done through the adb, but the thing is to get those files, maybe we could ask that fellow some help for this step, since he has the experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The core is a ARMv7 right? because the hummingbird processor is a ARMv7. Maybe it did failed because of that? I found the gpu drivers from the opensource. Check in the kernel folder. If I can give you the gpu file if you want. Well tell me what files you are missing i'll find to give it to you. (Well I don't know how to program so I try do to my best.)
EDIT: Also its seem that to compile ICS is more difficult than the other versions. We do need ubuntu to extract the binaries right?
EDIT2: People are saying that it's easier to build from CM9 than from the source. It is right or it's the same thing?
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/38960-build-your-own-cm9ics-preview-on-ubuntu-and-perhaps-debian/
Galaxy S Phone
Shouldn't you just be able to modify a Galaxy S ICS port and take out the data and other stuff you don't need?
zaclimon said:
The core is a ARMv7 right? because the hummingbird processor is a ARMv7. Maybe it did failed because of that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i configured it with the files of the samsung source, and it said ARMv5, we need to know which one it is, probably faild because of libaries compatibilities for that architecture.
zaclimon said:
EDIT: Also its seem that to compile ICS is more difficult than the other versions. We do need ubuntu to extract the binaries right?
EDIT2: People are saying that it's easier to build from CM9 than from the source. It is right or it's the same thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it is easier than the official source, they modify the source and takes out some things that cellphones dont need 'cause the source it's made for all devices, so it could be smaller and easier to compile, i'm gonna try this port and let ya' know, it will take a while since the source it's huge
Would be great if a couple of us do it, if you can @zaclimon try it, you don't need ubuntu, if you know which libaries that command has (sudo apt-get install build-essential). I have debian and i compiled the source just fine, debian has a minimal installation (no X11) but to compile source you dont need anything else! Let me know if anyone else it's triyng we could excahnge some ideas!
sodomywar said:
Well, i configured it with the files of the samsung source, and it said ARMv5, we need to know which one it is, probably faild because of libaries compatibilities for that architecture.
Maybe it is easier than the official source, they modify the source and takes out some things that cellphones dont need 'cause the source it's made for all devices, so it could be smaller and easier to compile, i'm gonna try this port and let ya' know, it will take a while since the source it's huge
Would be great if a couple of us do it, if you can @zaclimon try it, you don't need ubuntu, if you know which libaries that command has (sudo apt-get install build-essential). I have debian and i compiled the source just fine, debian has a minimal installation (no X11) but to compile source you dont need anything else! Let me know if anyone else it's triyng we could excahnge some ideas!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how many MB or GB the source has because I can't exceed my download's limitations?
EDIT: I'm a linux newbie. Is Ubuntu is the same thing as debian? Because Ubuntu is debian based right?
EDIT2: nevermind I'll be using ubuntu
alltellmobile said:
Shouldn't you just be able to modify a Galaxy S ICS port and take out the data and other stuff you don't need?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if we can (we should ask permissions) but it's definitly possible.
zaclimon said:
EDIT: I'm a linux newbie. Is Ubuntu is the same thing as debian? Because Ubuntu is debian based right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea Ubuntu should be pretty much the same.
Wish I knew how to program, because i would help out.
alltellmobile said:
Yea Ubuntu should be pretty much the same.
Wish I knew how to program, because i would help out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can help I follow the tutorials there:
http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/compile-ics
http://marakana.com/forums/android/general/269.html
Ok i was reading the first tutorial and got to the part about binaries for graphics acceleration; wouldn't we have to get ours before we compile it. Also i only have the US version of the galaxy player and if i made an image i couldn't test it because we don't have a custom recovery for ours.
alltellmobile said:
Ok i was reading the first tutorial and got to the part about binaries for graphics acceleration; wouldn't we have to get ours before we compile it. Also i only have the US version of the galaxy player and if i made an image i couldn't test it because we don't have a custom recovery for ours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh that's true well you can try to port a custom recovery?
zaclimon said:
Oh that's true well you can try to port a custom recovery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HaHa I'm not that good. that sounds way more complicated
hey guys, i've been following this thread and hopefully i can be of some help...
i'm currently in the process of pulling the system files from the original gingerbread build from the SGP...it looks like there will be some trial and error here comparing that of the nexus s build...correct me if i'm wrong, but is this where most of the proprietary libraries are located for the device?
i'm willing to engineer a generic build, described in the video tutorial and making the necessary adjustments for the ARMv7 board...
this is my first attempt at compiling Android source, so maybe we will have something or maybe i will have a good ol' brick...thanks for the great tutorial and video @zaclimon this has definitely shed some light on porting ICS for SGP
jdale38 said:
hey guys, i've been following this thread and hopefully i can be of some help...
i'm currently in the process of pulling the system files from the original gingerbread build from the SGP...it looks like there will be some trial and error here comparing that of the nexus s build...correct me if i'm wrong, but is this where most of the proprietary libraries are located for the device?
i'm willing to engineer a generic build, described in the video tutorial and making the necessary adjustments for the ARMv7 board...
this is my first attempt at compiling Android source, so maybe we will have something or maybe i will have a good ol' brick...thanks for the great tutorial and video @zaclimon this has definitely shed some light on porting ICS for SGP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are supposed to be there. But I have download all the source code of the firmware from opensource.samsung.com
Me and sodomywar are working with the internationnal version of the SGP4. If you want to join you're welcome.
EDIT: No problem for the tutorials.
alltellmobile said:
HaHa I'm not that good. that sounds way more complicated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend
So this is where i'm at currently. I'm trying to compile and I got this error:
Code:
build/core/base_rules.mk:166: *** system/extras/ext4_utils: MODULE.TARGET.EXECUTABLES.setup_fs already defined by device/samsung/galaxyplayer. Stop.
Does anyone know how to remove that error?
EDIT: nvm I managed to remove this error.
I have re-written the ICS camera HAL module to be a thin wrapper for the gingerbread libcamera.so and hence it will only work with the 2.6 kernel. The advantage is that getting to gingerbread level functionality should be quick Creating a new thread because there is a slight chance that this will work for all qualcomm devices with existing libcamera.so files (with slight mods ofcourse )
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?wjf035mz2vzunw4
Here is a zip file which contains the new camera HAL module. README file accompanying it has instructions on the locations for the files. If you already have the previous version of camera HAL working, all you have to do is replace camera.qsd8k.so and libcamera.so with the ones in the zip file.
What works:
1) Preview works.
2) Taking a picture works pretty well.
3) Size of picture is no longer huge.
4) Software zoom works.
5) Most of the other knobs like focus, file size etc. seemed to work as well in my testing.
6) Pretty stable as far as I can see
Not working yet:
Video and other fancy stuff.
If people have requests for other qualcomm devices after having tried the HAL included in the zip file, kindly include the following information.
1) logcat from having used the HAL module.
2) build.prop
3) libcamera.so from gingerbread ROM for the device.
4) liboemcamera.so from gingerbread ROM.
Currently known to work on the following devices:
1) Nexus One.
2) HTC Desire
3) HTC HD2
Enjoy and thanks for all the feedback.
Updates:
02/09/2012
Working barcode scanner mode
Flashable zip file (should work with texasice's ROMs)
http://www.mediafire.com/?w4fu0u05qtxq3tu
01/30/2012
Working Panorama mode
Flashable zip file (should work with texasice's ROMs)
http://www.mediafire.com/?5r599m5jg5yfaqn
Known issues:
Sometimes screen has some garbage while in Panorama mode viewfinder. Quitting completely from the app and restart or invoking Gallery from inside the app and returning back to camera app should mostly fix it.
Video enabled version:
Fastboot compatible images compiled from evervolv base:
For Stock hboot :
http://www.mediafire.com/?wdlip7h6necetia
For HBoot(s) supporting larger /system partition
http://www.mediafire.com/?f6rz3sz2r97qln0
Source code is now available at
https://github.com/rapmv78/
Your upload doesn't include a HAL, and from your instructions I am not sure if you are implying to use the HAL and the GB libcamera and liboemcamera, or the ones included.
please show me what i have to type in adb to push these files? (sorry i'm noob)
is camera.qsd8k.so not included?
sorry for my english..
Sorry wrong link. Now updated. Please re-download. And yes the files need to pushed through adb.
One step closer!
Thank you!
twistedumbrella said:
Your upload doesn't include a HAL, and from your instructions I am not sure if you are implying to use the HAL and the GB libcamera and liboemcamera, or the ones included.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link fixed. The files included in the zip are the ones to be used. The generic libs part is only for people with non nexus one devices and would want help enabling camera on them. Hope this clarifies better.
Is the code specific to qsd8 or just a generic wrapper function? On most "newer" devices you are looking at msm7x30, but generic qsd8 code, much like the gralloc, would still work with a rename.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
rapmv78 said:
Sorry wrong link. Now updated. Please re-download. And yes the files need to pushed through adb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i have installed the previous version, is it right what i have to type in adb?
Code:
adb remount
adb push libcamera.so /system/lib/libcamera.so
adb push camera.qsd8k.so /system/lib/hw/camera.qsd8k.so
adb reboot bootloader
fastboot flash boot boot-new.img
fastboot reboot
please help, i don't know what to do..
thanks..
mulerokeh said:
if i have installed the previous version, is it right what i have to type in adb?
Code:
adb remount
adb push libcamera.so /system/lib/libcamera.so
adb push camera.qsd8k.so /system/lib/hw/camera.qsd8k.so
adb reboot bootloader
fastboot flash boot boot-new.img
fastboot reboot
please help, i don't know what to do..
thanks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have previously working camera, you can skip flashing the boot-new.img file. It is there for people who do not have existing ics camera hal. Rest looks fine to me.
twistedumbrella said:
Is the code specific to qsd8 or just a generic wrapper function? On most "newer" devices you are looking at msm7x30, but generic qsd8 code, much like the gralloc, would still work with a rename.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is just a wrapper, but is dynamically linked with the libcamera.so file. So, if kernel change does not change structs and constants, things will work fine with a rename as you suggest. Otherwise it will not.
Maybe you should ask @charnsingh_online help for video, as he already works on 720p for N1
rapmv78 said:
It is just a wrapper, but is dynamically linked with the libcamera.so file. So, if kernel change does not change structs and constants, things will work fine with a rename as you suggest. Otherwise it will not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what were the kernel changes?
twistedumbrella said:
So what were the kernel changes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are none in this hal, that is why it works. What I was intending to say was that if MSMx30 kernel uses different size structs/constants it will not work.
rapmv78 said:
There are none in this hal, that is why it works. What I was intending to say was that if MSMx30 kernel uses different size structs/constants it will not work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is why I asked if it was generic code or specialized to qsd8. If the kernel code was not edited, that will be irrelevant because the source is not built (at least not by anyone other than CAF) using an inline kernel.
twistedumbrella said:
That is why I asked if it was generic code or specialized to qsd8. If the kernel code was not edited, that will be irrelevant because the source is not built (at least not by anyone other than CAF) using an inline kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hal code itself is generic, but it depends on libcamera.so, which inturn depends on kernel structs and constants to match the running kernel for successful control ioctls/pmem etc.
Can confirm this works on HTC Desire exactly as mentioned in OP.
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA App
I tried it with (Texas)Ice ICS ROM and network not work. Failed to load driver! Need flash another kernel?
sucon said:
I tried it with (Texas)Ice ICS ROM and network not work. Failed to load driver! Need flash another kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it works for me, but sometimes not responding after take 2 or 3 photos..
but great work!!
Sent from my Nexus One using xda premium
sucon said:
I tried it with (Texas)Ice ICS ROM and network not work. Failed to load driver! Need flash another kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Works both fine with texasice ICS!
I've tried porting several roms to my devices and every time I try to flash I always get status 0 or some type of error! I can't logcat from recovery because some things do not work completely with clockworkmod I have. I even manually tried porting the same method that android kitchen does and still run into the same problem. I have no idea what I should try next? This is really making me made. I get no help at all after searching and searching every where!
android kitchen
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=633246
all in one guide
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1273718
And some other methods and still no luck!!
You are right. There is no guide. It's trial and error. Logcat helps and if you know what certain files do that helps too.
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats great if building from source
but i think he is talking about porting roms that are not AOSP.
The problem with a porting tutorial is that all devices and roms are a bit different so there will never will be a tutorial to get this done 100%. They are great guides to give you a start but it can take a lot more to get things ported.
if the device architecture is similar
Ex... Evo 4g to Incredible
than porting is fairly easy
being able to logcat is very necessary when porting roms
getting that working is your first step.
I always gave up on porting just because i dont have the patients to do it.
Exactly. I've ported several roms from the E3D and Sensation to the Rezound, and they are easy because the processor is the same. All you really need to get it booting is the kernel in most cases.
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that simple if you have to make a device tree from scratch like I'm doing
I've a question!!
I have an HTC Explorer (based on Qualcomm MSM7227) and I'd like to build a rom (AOSP or Cyano)...
I've downloaded Kernel Source Code but after hours of researches I haven't found a guide for merge a rom with a kernel..
can you help me?
thank you!
Can we port a rom from HTC desire to Motorola defy....is it easy??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
extremists said:
Can we port a rom from HTC desire to Motorola defy....is it easy??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about as hard as it gets.
Unless building from source its not as difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
wes342 said:
That's about as hard as it gets.
Unless building from source its not as difficult.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do u know how to port??
HIT THANKS IF IVE HELPED
The thing is there's also no real guide on how to make your own public repo for devices who don't have one .
E.g. Galaxy R
Herpderp Defy.
So I found out how to build from cm7 sources and it is a no go... I do not know how in the world you guys can port any roms. How do you get your files up on git hub any way? There is more to it then just compiling from cm sources..
Here's a slightly outdated one
EmoBoiix3 said:
The thing is there's also no real guide on how to make your own public repo for devices who don't have one .
E.g. Galaxy R
Herpderp Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just so its clear... this (slightly outdated) guide would be (the best I've found) for building a device tree (that you may elect to throw up on github) that can be used to build AOSP.. the same device tree probably could build CyanogenMod or MIUI fairly easily (minimal editing) but you are correct... no exact guide bc its not an exact science (lots of different devices out there with lots of different device configurations; even kernels different some are ti omap, some are qualcomm msm, etc.). Basically you build a tree to define your hardware.. AOSP, CM or MIUI will build themselves based on this definition (device) tree.
http://www.kandroid.org/online-pdk/guide/build_new_device.html
Now after you follow this guide, google the various build errors you get (one at a time) and perfect your tree until you get basic bring up... then perfect it some more until you get all your modules working (will take some aosp kernel cooking as well)... then perfect it some more... in a few months you should have something pretty decent (and learn tree building a bit more; we all learn by doing ) Best advice I have for you; going through the same thing myself.
Also wouldn't be a bad idea to download Hardware Info apk (Sleek Apps) and email yourself the info it spits out. That way you at least have a list of some of the hardware you are trying to define.
Rob
mDroidd said:
It's simple:
grab the sources from github, add your device and vendor folder, add the device to the list in the mk files, lunch, and build.
openetna is a repository with many bugfixes, as you will have them.
Easy ****!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How exactly do you do this? How do you build it completely specifically for your device?
Sorry, I'm a complete noob on building from scratch and Linux. Could anyone shed some some light?
Thanks you guys
Hi,
first of all, i know that it is prohibited to do that for public roms, but i want to do it for my own builds.
Until CM11 it was pretty easy to integrate. But how can i do that during build time with CM12?
Any advices, how to integrate the package?
Cheers and Thanks
Saint.
With CM plan to separate its self from Google completely they have made it just about impossible. Not to mention you would have to rewrite the whole built script
zelendel said:
With CM plan to separate its self from Google completely they have made it just about impossible. Not to mention you would have to rewrite the whole built script
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
thnx for the answer at first, hmmmm it thing it should not be that hard, the updater script of the tools would need to be attached to the updater-script of the rom and all the stuff would have to be put into the source itself, the question is where to put it to?
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Modifications:
SELinux unlocked
Disabled protection does not allow to boot the OS(disabled at the level of Linux kernel)
Permissive mode is set automatically at boot (without the possibility to switch back to enforce)
Before(you can do it after flash,but recommended before) installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
SecurityLogAgent has to be removed or frozen.
Flash kernel in odin.
v2 - SELinux fix.
Download: Google Drive
Sources: Google Drive
Blue cat said:
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Modifications:
SELinux unlocked
Disabled protection does not allow to boot the OS(disabled at the level of Linux kernel)
Permissive mode is set automatically at boot (without the possibility to switch back to enforce)
Before installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
Flash kernel in odin.
This is my first kernel which I create on Linux. I hope everything will be working stable.
Download: Google Drive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you - I flashed it as per your instructions. Seems to have worked fine and it's showing it as running as permissive!
Hi,
I made mine for my rom, but yours is good too.
Thank you for the comunity
Re...
Oops problems !! security notification
Alan-B said:
Hi,
I made mine for my rom, but yours is good too.
Thank you for the comunity
Re...
Oops problems !! security notification
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should remove ALL knox apk,because i never not seen security notifications on my device.
This kernel have only 2 changes.
security/selinux/Makefile and security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
Blue cat said:
I think you should remove ALL knox apk,because i never not seen security notifications on my device.
This kernel have only 2 changes.
security/selinux/Makefile and security/selinux/selinuxfs.c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
With my boot.img I have no this message! It is when I made out a will your that and come this message!
NB:
Your Boot and all the eliminated knoks!! (Rom deodex 5.1.1)
Alan-B said:
Your Boot and all the eliminated knoks!! (Rom deodex 5.1.1)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok,I found a solution.
You need to remove SecurityLogAgent
Bluecat, thanks for this! I wonder if you know what differences exist between the P605 and the P607T. Also, did you use the EUR_LL source from Samsung's opensource portal? Its strange that they already have the source out for the P605, but nothing yet for the P607T which received the update first. Makes me think maybe the code base is the same and its only the bloatware bundled by the carrier that differs?
I am also curious to just learn and get my hands dirty with this. Can you share the Makefile for this kernel, or just point towards the guide you used (assuming you used one) to compile this?
karthikrr said:
Bluecat, thanks for this! I wonder if you know what differences exist between the P605 and the P607T. Also, did you use the EUR_LL source from Samsung's opensource portal? Its strange that they already have the source out for the P605, but nothing yet for the P607T which received the update first. Makes me think maybe the code base is the same and its only the bloatware bundled by the carrier that differs?
I am also curious to just learn and get my hands dirty with this. Can you share the Makefile for this kernel, or just point towards the guide you used (assuming you used one) to compile this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry,but i dont know differences between the P605 and P607T.
Yes,sources SM-P605_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip and version OI5.
If you want check have code 607 and 605 differences or not you should check checksum both original zImage(linux kernel). Extract them from both boot.img and compare.
Version 2 use standart selinux permissive way used by mostly kernel developers,it's have many changes in code now and it's will be very long to explain how to change to permissive,just use my sources available now in first post and compare them with original sources.
If you talk about how to compile kernel...was use many guides and other forums...hard part was only create .config file
Blue cat said:
Sorry,but i dont know differences between the P605 and P607T.
Yes,sources SM-P605_EUR_LL_Opensource.zip and version OI5.
If you want check have code 607 and 605 differences or not you should check checksum both original zImage(linux kernel). Extract them from both boot.img and compare.
Version 2 use standart selinux permissive way used by mostly kernel developers,it's have many changes in code now and it's will be very long to explain how to change to permissive,just use my sources available now in first post and compare them with original sources.
If you talk about how to compile kernel...was use many guides and other forums...hard part was only create .config file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will try to extract the zImage from the P607T boot.img. I do not have the P605 though, do you know if the stock boot.img is downloadable anywhere?
Thanks for uploading the source. I just finished downloading the original source from the opensource site, will compare the two and try to understand.
I do know how to complile a linux kernel, I meant can you share the .config file (not the makefile, as I wrongly stated earlier), so I can see what has changed across the entire kernel. Rather than just change one line directly in the config file to disable SELinux, I wanted to use make menuconfig and go through the whole process, just to learn more about android kernels. But since I do not know much about the hardware and driver requirements, wanted to see a stock .config as well as your changed .config to understand.
karthikrr said:
Will try to extract the zImage from the P607T boot.img. I do not have the P605 though, do you know if the stock boot.img is downloadable anywhere?
Thanks for uploading the source. I just finished downloading the original source from the opensource site, will compare the two and try to understand.
I do know how to complile a linux kernel, I meant can you share the .config file (not the makefile, as I wrongly stated earlier), so I can see what has changed across the entire kernel. Rather than just change one line directly in the config file to disable SELinux, I wanted to use make menuconfig and go through the whole process, just to learn more about android kernels. But since I do not know much about the hardware and driver requirements, wanted to see a stock .config as well as your changed .config to understand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My config https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOSmdieTNVaFY3VjA/view?usp=sharing
Boot https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOVFZGZGs3YmloX2s/view?usp=sharing
I dont have original config,you can create your own on linux.
Blue cat said:
My config https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOSmdieTNVaFY3VjA/view?usp=sharing
Boot https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxQroXyaGzZOVFZGZGs3YmloX2s/view?usp=sharing
I dont have original config,you can create your own on linux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brilliant! Thanks for sharing ... As and when I learn anything relevant to the issue of P605 vs. P607T, will update here.
Why does the wifi password get forgotten on every boot?
Any fix for that matter?
valexi said:
Why does the wifi password get forgotten on every boot?
Any fix for that matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blue cat said:
Based on the first 5.1.1 sources, version OI5
Before installing the kernel required go to build.prop,find ro.securestorage.support and set the value to false. System may forget your WiFi passwords after flash custom kernel.
SecurityLogAgent has to be removed or frozen.
Flash kernel in odin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you missed the update to the original post, the fix is as above, set securestorage to false. Since you have already flashed, you can still go to build.prop, make this change, reboot, and you should be fine.
karthikrr said:
Maybe you missed the update to the original post, the fix is as above, set securestorage to false. Since you have already flashed, you can still go to build.prop, make this change, reboot, and you should be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried this. With ro.securestorage.support false. Still no WiFi passwords saved after reboot.
Other than that, this works great!
Xposed (for Samsung by wanam) works great!
valexi, the only thing Ive seen suggested in your case is to reflash the firmware. I do not know of any other solutions for this, because pretty much everybody with this problem seems to have solved it when they changed the securestorage thing.
BlueCat, I went ahead and compared checksums for the stock p607t and p605 kernels, they do NOT match. I also extracted the kernels themselves and the zimage files are of different sizes. I then compared the default config files of the P605_LL_EUR source with the only available source for the P607T, which is KK ... They are considerably different. I am of course going with the assumption that the core config for the kernel between KK and LL should not be TOO different, but of course, this is NOT a reliable test. Lastly, I should also say, the P607T source contained an insane number of config files in the Arch/Arm/configs folder, while the P605 source only had three files! I only compared the three that were common ... It seemed like the 607T has the config files for every possible version of the device, while the 605 one had very specific configs for that device only ... This I am speculating based on the fact that the 607T folder even had a msm8894_sec_l03ltmo_defconfig file in addition to the msm8894_sec_l03leur_defconfig file in the 605.
Will do more comparisons over the next few days, but it does seem like there are more changes under the hood between the 605 and the 607T than one would expect. I really wish samsung would release the source for the 607t, but if you check that page, there is just one single KK code there and nothing else, so it does not seem likely anytime soon
Blue cat said:
Ok,I found a solution.
You need to remove SecurityLogAgent
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Re,
Ok remove SecurityLogAgent and folder Container it is ok...
But delete all other knox and Klm gives a problem with the playstor. (Certain protections cannot be erased)
Hey guys,
Great news around, especially with roms like Alan-B's. Thanks for sharing :good:.
Running 4.4, planning to update 5.x as soon as I'm sure I can run Linux Deploy (meaning the need of permissive kernel), though I can't find any intel about VTS (Virtual Terminal Support) enabled kernel. I've been looking for months a way to run framebuffered distros and looks like this is the solution.
I could try to make it myself but I have no experience in kernels, would someone mind give me a hand to get to this goal? At least give me a hint to "quickly" develop and try one, to see if it works and how well...
Don't even know if I'm looking the right way anymore, so thanks by advance for any help and again for the sharing :highfive:.
karthikrr said:
valexi, the only thing Ive seen suggested in your case is to reflash the firmware. I do not know of any other solutions for this, because pretty much everybody with this problem seems to have solved it when they changed the securestorage thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But when I reflash the firmware how can I set securestorage BEFORE installing permissive kernel as I don't have root to change build.prop?
valexi said:
But when I reflash the firmware how can I set securestorage BEFORE installing permissive kernel as I don't have root to change build.prop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't. Reflash, root, edit build.prop, reboot, set wifi password once again, reboot, it SHOULD be fine. If its not after this sequence, Im not sure what else may work. Every case of this particular problem that I've seen was resolved with this solution.
Luckily I didn't reflash yet. I checked again build.prop and securestorage was true. For some reason it didn't stick first time.
I edited it again and now WiFi works as intended. So I can say that this solution works. Great kernel.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk