Benchmarks on CM7 - Optimus One, P500, V General

I was searching for full and comprehensive benchmark results of our O1, but was unable to find. So I benchmarked my O1, and thought I would share the results here.
Tests done 3 times @787 Mhz, and the best run is displayed here.
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel v19.2
Linpack = 9.776
Quadrant Advanced = 1659
Quadrant Standard = 1256
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 366, Games Index 690
Antutu = 2019
Nenamark 1 = 40.6
Nenamark 2 = 12.7
Neocore with sound = 64.1
Neocore without sound = 65.7
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with minimal apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 9.691
Quadrant Advanced = 1661
Quadrant Standard = 1334
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 441, Games Index 603
Antutu = 2064
Nenamark 1 = 40.3
Nenamark 2 = 12.7
Neocore with sound = 65.2
Neocore without sound = 69.7
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps franco kernel v1.1-21082011
Linpack = 9.935
Quadrant Advanced = 1567
Quadrant Standard = 1280
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 496, Games Index 1036
Antutu = 2067
Nenamark 1 = 42.4
Nenamark 2 = 12.3
Neocore with sound = 73
Neocore without sound = 75.6
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps default kernel
Linpack = 9.84
Quadrant Advanced = 1480
Quadrant Standard = 1285
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 475, Games Index 1034
Antutu = 1975
Nenamark 1 = 41.7
Nenamark 2 = 10.7
Neocore with sound = 62.8
Neocore without sound = 64.5
Tests done 3 times @600 Mhz, and the best run is displayed here.
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 7.782
Quadrant Advanced = 1262
Quadrant Standard = 1063
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 333, Games Index 487
Antutu = 1787
Nenamark 1 = 34.1
Nenamark 2 = 10.3
Neocore with sound = 52.6
Neocore without sound = 58.8
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with minimal apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 7.794
Quadrant Advanced = 1270
Quadrant Standard = 1176
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 284, Games Index 491
Antutu = 1821
Nenamark 1 = 34.1
Nenamark 2 = 10.3
Neocore with sound = 52.9
Neocore without sound = 58.7
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps franco kernel v1.1-21082011
Linpack = 7.962
Quadrant Advanced = 1224
Quadrant Standard = 1055
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 338, Games Index 825
Antutu = 1870
Nenamark 1 = 36.3
Nenamark 2 = 10.7
Neocore with sound = 61.4
Neocore without sound = 67.5
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps default kernel
Linpack = 7.84
Quadrant Advanced = 1205
Quadrant Standard = 1038
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 391, Games Index 815
Antutu = 1782
Nenamark 1 = 34.4
Nenamark 2 = 8.5
Neocore with sound = 56.9
Neocore without sound = 61.7
For those who dont want to read all the crap and want the result~
CM7 6.6.1 mik with franco kernel v1.1-21082011 V/S CM 7 6.5.5 mik with franco kernel v19.2 = CM7 6.6.1 mik with franco kernel v1.1-21082011 wins with 7% overall advantage.
The 3D score in quadrant for CM7 6.5.5 FK 19.2 was 510~520, in CM7 6.6.1 FK v1.1-21082011 it went up to 650~665. A 27.8% increase!!
EDIT : CM 7 6.5.7 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel v19.2
Linpack = 10.039
Quadrant Advanced = 1684
Quadrant Standard = 1304
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 442, Games Index 699
Antutu = 2092
Nenamark 1 = 40.4
Nenamark 2 = 12.6
Neocore with sound = 65.3
Neocore without sound = 70.2
EDIT 2 : CM 7 6.5.7 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel v19.3
Linpack = 9.82
Quadrant Advanced = 1609
Quadrant Standard = 1384
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 437, Games Index 693
Antutu = 2021
Nenamark 1 = 39.8
Nenamark 2 = 11.7
Neocore with sound = 64.9
Neocore without sound = 67.5
If you think I helped you or you think this post was cool , please hit the Thanks button.

KaKkaR0T said:
I was searching for full and comprehensive benchmark results of our O1, but was unable to find. So I benchmarked my O1, and thought I would share the results here.
Tests done 3 times @787 Mhz, and the best run is displayed here.
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel v19.2
Linpack = 9.776
Quadrant Advanced = 1659
Quadrant Standard = 1256
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 366, Games Index 690
Antutu = 2019
Nenamark 1 = 40.6
Nenamark 2 = 12.7
Neocore with sound = 64.1
Neocore without sound = 65.7
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with minimal apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 9.691
Quadrant Advanced = 1661
Quadrant Standard = 1334
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 441, Games Index 603
Antutu = 2064
Nenamark 1 = 40.3
Nenamark 2 = 12.7
Neocore with sound = 65.2
Neocore without sound = 69.7
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps franco kernel v1.1-21082011
Linpack = 9.935
Quadrant Advanced = 1567
Quadrant Standard = 1280
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 496, Games Index 1036
Antutu = 2067
Nenamark 1 = 42.4
Nenamark 2 = 12.3
Neocore with sound = 73
Neocore without sound = 75.6
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps default kernel
Linpack = 9.84
Quadrant Advanced = 1480
Quadrant Standard = 1285
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 475, Games Index 1034
Antutu = 1975
Nenamark 1 = 41.7
Nenamark 2 = 10.7
Neocore with sound = 62.8
Neocore without sound = 64.5
Tests done 3 times @600 Mhz, and the best run is displayed here.
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with 100+ apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 7.782
Quadrant Advanced = 1262
Quadrant Standard = 1063
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 333, Games Index 487
Antutu = 1787
Nenamark 1 = 34.1
Nenamark 2 = 10.3
Neocore with sound = 52.6
Neocore without sound = 58.8
CM 7 6.5.5 mik with minimal apps franco kernel 19.2
Linpack = 7.794
Quadrant Advanced = 1270
Quadrant Standard = 1176
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 284, Games Index 491
Antutu = 1821
Nenamark 1 = 34.1
Nenamark 2 = 10.3
Neocore with sound = 52.9
Neocore without sound = 58.7
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps franco kernel v1.1-21082011
Linpack = 7.962
Quadrant Advanced = 1224
Quadrant Standard = 1055
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 338, Games Index 825
Antutu = 1870
Nenamark 1 = 36.3
Nenamark 2 = 10.7
Neocore with sound = 61.4
Neocore without sound = 67.5
CM7 6.6.1 mik with minimal apps default kernel
Linpack = 7.84
Quadrant Advanced = 1205
Quadrant Standard = 1038
smartbench 2011 = Productivity Index 391, Games Index 815
Antutu = 1782
Nenamark 1 = 34.4
Nenamark 2 = 8.5
Neocore with sound = 56.9
Neocore without sound = 61.7
For those who dont want to read all the crap and want the result~
CM7 6.6.1 mik with franco kernel v1.1-21082011 V/S CM 7 6.5.5 mik with franco kernel v19.2 = CM7 6.6.1 mik with franco kernel v1.1-21082011 wins with 7% overall advantage.
The 3D score in quadrant for CM7 6.5.5 FK 19.2 was 510~520, in CM7 6.6.1 FK v1.1-21082011 it went up to 650~665. A 27.8% increase!!
If you think I helped you or you think this post was cool , please hit the Thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do a test wit v6.5.7 not v6.5.5 cuz use the latest build... And title change to 'Benchmark results on cm7' press thanks if this helps for ur thread...
Sent from LGE Secret phone using tapatalk app...

dax4182 said:
Please do a test wit v6.5.7 not v6.5.5 cuz use the latest build... And title change to 'Benchmark results on cm7' press thanks if this helps for ur thread...
Sent from LGE Secret phone using tapatalk app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 6.5.5 is outdated

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Everything is in my signature..

Updated 1st post with CM7 6.5.7 benchamrks.

KaKkaR0T said:
Updated 1st post with CM7 6.5.7 benchamrks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm7 6.5.7 results are very good. I am impressed. 6.5.7 seems much improved than 6.5.5. In fact quadrant scores are even better than 6.6.1. Astonishing!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

lekhwani said:
Cm7 6.5.7 results are very good. I am impressed. 6.5.7 seems much improved than 6.5.5. In fact quadrant scores are even better than 6.6.1. Astonishing!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But 3D scores are very high in 6.6.1

Yes 3D on 6.6.1 is awesome, in quadrant 3D tests I got 80+ FPS steadily in the planet test and 16 FPS in the DNA test and it could reneder 310+ frames of the 1st 3D test.
Whereas in 6.5.7, 1st test I hardly reneder 270 frames, the planet test I get about 70 FPS and in the DNA test I get rock solid 11 FPS
Sent from my JetOptimus

OK, I am starting to distrust the random number generator such as Quadrant.
I have only one benchmark:
Run Avatar 3D game on your ROM+kernel. Who can smoothly run this thing in the later stage of the game(like Chapter 5), who won the contest hands down.
Anyone?

Smartbench 2011 test is fairly nice. I tested at all stages with Gangstar Miami Vindication, and the smoothest was on cm7 6.6.1 with Franco kernel v1.1 . Although there was'nt any noticibale lagg on any ROM with the Franco kernel.

Updated 1st post with 6.5.7 FK v19.3 benchmarks, 3D performance has got down a bit that 19.2

Related

[KERNEL] 2.6.29, ~1600MHz, >1000 Quadrant

I removed the link as well as the kernel images. You would be better off running a kernel found in ROM manager. That being said, I would like to leave this along with a link to the Samsung S5PC110 technical document: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13699504/S5PC110_EVT1_UM10.pdf
For those brave enough to tweak their own, I present to you the locations of things to change.
PART 1: CPU AND OTHER ARM SUBSYSTEM FREQUENCIES
First off, there are three files you will want to look at and become familiar with: s5pc110-clock.c is the code that will control the CPU frequency. s5pc11x-dvfs.c controls the throttling thresholds for switching from one mode to another. max8998_consumer.c controls voltage levels for the Maxim 8998 voltage regulator. Although it doesn't state granulatrity, I've assumed it to be 25-unit increments measured in mV.
s5pc110-clock.c:
Code:
/*APLL_FOUT, MPLL_FOUT, ARMCLK, HCLK_DSYS*/
static const u32 s5p_sysout_clk_tab_1GHZ[][4] = {
// APLL:1000,ARMCLK:1000,HCLK_MSYS:200,MPLL:667,HCLK_DSYS:166,HCLK_PSYS:133,PCLK_MSYS:100,PCLK_DSYS:83,PCLK_PSYS:66
{1066* MHZ, 667 *MHZ, 1066 *MHZ, 166 *MHZ},
// APLL:800,ARMCLK:800,HCLK_MSYS:200,MPLL:667,HCLK_DSYS:166,HCLK_PSYS:133,PCLK_MSYS:100,PCLK_DSYS:83,PCLK_PSYS:66
{800* MHZ, 667 *MHZ, 800 *MHZ, 166 *MHZ},
// APLL:800,ARMCLK:400,HCLK_MSYS:200,MPLL:667,HCLK_DSYS:166,HCLK_PSYS:133,PCLK_MSYS:100,PCLK_DSYS:83,PCLK_PSYS:66
{400* MHZ, 667 *MHZ, 400 *MHZ, 166 *MHZ},
// APLL:800,ARMCLK:200,HCLK_MSYS:200,MPLL:667,HCLK_DSYS:166,HCLK_PSYS:133,PCLK_MSYS:100,PCLK_DSYS:83,PCLK_PSYS:66
{200* MHZ, 667 *MHZ, 200 *MHZ, 166 *MHZ},
// APLL:800,ARMCLK:100,HCLK_MSYS:100,MPLL:667,HCLK_DSYS:83,HCLK_PSYS:66,PCLK_MSYS:50,PCLK_DSYS:66,PCLK_PSYS:66
{100* MHZ, 667 *MHZ, 100 *MHZ, 133 *MHZ},
};
#define DIV_TAB_MAX_FIELD 12
//yhkim hack from TR note. We got TechnicalReport-S5PC110_Android_DRAMin_DVFSlevel4.doc.
//please check it. we change last value to 7. original val is 4 in s5p_sys_clk_div0_tab_1GHZ.
/*div0 ratio table*/
/*apll, a2m, HCLK_MSYS, PCLK_MSYS, HCLK_DSYS, PCLK_DSYS, HCLK_PSYS, PCLK_PSYS, MFC_DIV, G3D_DIV, MSYS source(2D, 3D, MFC)(0->apll,1->mpll), DMC0 div*/
static const u32 s5p_sys_clk_div0_tab_1GHZ[][DIV_TAB_MAX_FIELD] = {
{0, 4, 4, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 0, 3},
{0, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 0, 3},
{1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 0, 3},
{3, 3, 0, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 3, 3, 0, 3},
{7, 7, 0, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, 3, 3, 1, 7},
};
/*pms value table*/
/*APLL(m, p, s), MPLL(m, p, s)*/
static const u32 s5p_sys_clk_mps_tab_1GHZ[][6] = {
{266, 6, 1, 667, 12, 1},
{200, 6, 1, 667, 12, 1},
{200, 6, 1, 667, 12, 1},
{200, 6, 1, 667, 12, 1},
{200, 6, 1, 667, 12, 1},
};
PART 2: VOLTAGES
The only things I've found worthy of noting about how to enter values in here are:
1) The clock speed can be anything you want it to be.
2) The voltage in frequency_match_1GHZ (same line as frequency) might not be used to set the voltage gates. It may be used only to report to /proc/cpuinfo or other monitoring systems (SetCPU).
3) The third column is either 1100 or 1000. So far, it's always 1100 when not in the lowest power configuration. At that point, it's 1000. I think this has to do with the system-wide power configuration (not the CPU/GPU), and you may be able to increase it, but I have not tried. Please be very careful with this, as CPUs are generally more robust in terms of thermal compensation than other components.
4) dvs_volt_table_1GHZ is where you set the voltages (dvs_volt_table_800MHZ for boot mode). You set them by linking DVSARM# (1-5, 1GHZ / 1-4, 800MHz boot) and DVSINT# (1/2 for 1100/1000).
Code:
/* frequency voltage matching table */
static const unsigned int frequency_match_1GHZ[][4] = {
/* frequency, Mathced VDD ARM voltage , Matched VDD INT*/
{1066000, 1175, 1100, 0}, // Mine tested stable at 1175. Your mileage may vary.
{800000, 1075, 1100, 1}, // Stable at 1075. YMMV.
{400000, 950, 1100, 2}, // Stable at 950. YMMV.
{200000, 950, 1000, 4}, // Stable at 950. YMMV.
{100000, 950, 1000, 5}, // Stable at 950. YMMV.
};
static const unsigned int frequency_match_800MHZ[][4] = {
/* frequency, Mathced VDD ARM voltage , Matched VDD INT*/
{800000, 1100, 1100, 0},
{400000, 1050, 1100, 1},
{200000, 950, 1100, 3},
{100000, 950, 1000, 4},
};
const unsigned int (*frequency_match[2])[4] = {
frequency_match_1GHZ,
frequency_match_800MHZ,
};
/* voltage table */
static const unsigned int voltage_table[16] = {
750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050,
1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350,
1400, 1450, 1500
};
extern unsigned int S5PC11X_FREQ_TAB;
//extern const unsigned int (*frequency_match[2])[4];
static struct regulator *Reg_Arm = NULL, *Reg_Int = NULL;
static unsigned int s_arm_voltage=0, s_int_voltage=0;
unsigned long set1_gpio;
unsigned long set2_gpio;
unsigned long set3_gpio;
/*only 4 Arm voltages and 2 internal voltages possible*/
static const unsigned int dvs_volt_table_800MHZ[][3] = {
{L0, DVSARM2, DVSINT1},
{L1, DVSARM3, DVSINT1},
//266 {L2, DVSARM3, DVSINT1},
{L2, DVSARM4, DVSINT1},
{L3, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
// {L4, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
// {L5, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
};
static const unsigned int dvs_volt_table_1GHZ[][3] = {
{L0, DVSARM1, DVSINT1},//DVSINT0
{L1, DVSARM2, DVSINT1},
{L2, DVSARM3, DVSINT1},
//266 {L3, DVSARM3, DVSINT1},
{L3, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
{L4, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
// {L5, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
// {L6, DVSARM4, DVSINT2},
};
const unsigned int (*dvs_volt_table[2])[3] = {
dvs_volt_table_1GHZ,
dvs_volt_table_800MHZ,
};
static const unsigned int dvs_arm_voltage_set[][2] = {
{DVSARM1, 1275},
{DVSARM2, 1100},
{DVSARM3, 1050},
{DVSARM4, 950},
{DVSINT1, 1100},
{DVSINT2, 1000},
};
That about concludes what I know about this. Thank you for the discussion, and happy hacking.
Hmmm. I seem a tad scared to try this out lol
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I'm feeling squirrely, screw it I'll try it. Flash like anything else in recovery? All the rest is just if you want to alter your kernel correct?
Voodoo isn't included in this kernel, right?
jv
johnnyv5 said:
Voodoo isn't included in this kernel, right?
jv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I don't believe so. Voodoo kernels routinely score well over 1500 in Quadrant, so this is likely just a stock Samsung kernel tweaked with some SERIOUS overclock potential.
I'm trying it. So is this at(or around) 1.6ghz? And tweakable so we can get our own OC?
Great stuff Hex
I just did a quadrant. Is the FPS cap removed? The graphics benchmarks were unbelievable.
Nice job, AgentHex. Its been interesting reading your progress on IRC and then see it released!
Yea, Not touchin this one till it's made for release, 1600 is a pretty serious speed to tinker with.
GoogleAndroid said:
I just did a quadrant. Is the FPS cap removed? The graphics benchmarks were unbelievable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you score?
saps said:
What did you score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1172 and then 1128.
GoogleAndroid said:
1172 and then 1128.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that your 3D score?
saps said:
Is that your 3D score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, overall.
OH DEAR GOD BLAZING SPEEDS.
We need to get voodoo integrated with this bad boy and we'll be rockin!
Thanks for your work!
Btw, the FPS cap is blown off. I hit 80 FPS in Quadrant
Does anyone know though, if this is the same as the Manhattan Project that was scrapped in the Vibrant forums for inaccurately blowing up the cpu/gpu scores, or is it actually working properly?
phoenx06 said:
OH DEAR GOD BLAZING SPEEDS.
We need to get voodoo integrated with this bad boy and we'll be rockin!
Thanks for your work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Lagfix, ColorFix(with all fixes), and BLN.
GoogleAndroid said:
Agreed. Lagfix, ColorFix(with all fixes), and BLN.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could go without BLN. I must be the only one that doesn't want it. The kernels with it make a terrible buzzing noise while on the phone and having the button lights on all the time has to drain battery like crazy. But agreed on the others
aroy002 said:
Does anyone know though, if this is the same as the Manhattan Project that was scrapped in the Vibrant forums for inaccurately blowing up the cpu/gpu scores, or is it actually working properly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, not at all. This is just the OP doing it on his own

Comparing Benchmark results for different roms

Hey, guys I just thought it would've been nice if we could compare the Benchmark results for the different roms for the HTC Hero. The best would've been if we could have the scores on a clean rom aka a rom with no apps installed (except the system apps and the Benchmark app of course).
So if you have the time and will, do a quick benchmark before you restore your apps next time you flash a new rom and post the results here Please inform which app you used to test and what CPU frequencies as well
As I'm trying to find the max score for the different roms, you can post your results for ROMs allready listed as well.
Update: If every1 could do Benchmark with max frequence 576 MHz it would've been great, makes it easier to compare
At 576 MHz:
SalsaSense RC1
Linpack single: 2.535
Linpack multi:2.811
Quadrant: 310
Antutu: 806
Floyo 1.4pre1
Linpack single: 4.206
Quadrant: 369
Elelinux GB v2.7
Antutu: 776
Quadrant 359
Linpack single:4.998
Linpack multi: 3.637
Neocore: 49.8
At 710 MHz
Floyo1.4pre1
Linpack single: 5.063
Linpack multi: 4.993
Quadrant: 399
Cronos GB 710 MHz
Quadrant:449
Elelinux GB 2.7 710 MHz
antutu benchmark 863
quadrant 403
linpack single thread 4.74
linpack multi thread 4.604
neocore 52.6
At other:
Floyo 1.4pre1 691 MHz:
Linpack: 4.9
Quadrant: 370
THC Bandit 729.6 MHz:
Quadrant: 308
Neocore: 62.5
Please note that for now some of the results are from clean roms, and others with lots of apps installed. Therefore it doesn't show it the right way. However I hope that we after some time will have all the roms max performance Also note that I haven't done all these tests. I can't guarantee that the numbers here aren't random numbers who popped into someones head, so don't blame me
on my own hatc salsa port i get with :
quadrant 308
neocore (bugged) like 59.3 till 62.5
stroobach said:
on my own hatc salsa port i get with :
quadrant 308
neocore (bugged) like 59.3 till 62.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, what CPU frequencies did you use?
on cronos gingerbread overclock to 710 i got 449 on quadrant
A little update to OP. Sorry to u guys who allready posted, but will mash the thanks button for u
Habarug said:
Thanks, what CPU frequencies did you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
smartass 176 - 729.6
Elelinux gingerbread
antutu benchmark 776. 863 at 710
quadrant 359 403 at 710
linpack single thread 3.998. 4.74 at 710
linpack multi thread 3.637 4.604 at 710
neocore 49.8. 52.6 at 710

[Q] Best SetCPU Settings for CM7 with Bali

I am currently running CM7 with the Bali kernel. I just recently installed setCPU and wanted to know what the best settings are for having decent battery life without taking away to much from performance. I'm pretty new to OC/UV so any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
anybody? any help would be great? I've been trying to search for settings but havent gotten to far.
Conservative is great 1000-100 an 4 speed On demand
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Here is my settings on Voltage Control for Glitch. That may help you out a bit. Have you tried looking in the Bali thread to see if anyone posted any stable results?
1300: 1400mv -0mv = 1400
1200: 1350mv -0mv = 1350
1000: 1250mv -25mv = 1225
800: 1200mv -50mv = 1150
400: 1050mv -75mv = 975
200: 950mv -75mv = 875
100: 950mv -100mv = 850

Structured Undervolting Thread

Tegrapart - d00
Kernel - Faux's 0.18 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1175mv (-125mv)
1.2ghz = 1075mv (-125mv)
1.1ghz = 975mv (-125mv)
1.0ghz = 900mv (-100mv)
800mhz = 800mv (-100mv)
456mhz = 625mv (-175mv)
216mhz = 525mv (-225mv)
Compile your information like this, if we can get 50+ voltage tables from users we should have enough to create some decent starting voltages that should work for most people.
Being an insane computer geek, and overclocking my PC's like mad, I can tell you that your not all going to be able to use the same settings. Use these as a starting point if you wish, from what I have seen though, I have a great SoC for overclocking. I wouldn't expect to get those voltages with certainty. Phones are ridiculously easy to overclock though, the voltages adds a nice kick to the whole idea though. It's very easy to figure out what kind of overclock/voltage ratio your phone CPU has....
You can see it clearly in my table of voltages there. 1.0ghz and 800mhz seem to be the weakest, they require more voltage than any other high end frequency. So I knew that once I isolated those voltages I had an inkling where I would be in the end with all the other frequencies. Sure enough I couldn't get 1.0ghz to run -125mv. But it stopped there, 1.1,1.2 and 1.3ghz run @ -125mv. I suspect the voltage is already so high as it is you can adjust it a bit more. It only takes another 75mv to get to 1.1 and then another 100mv per 100mhz jump as per usual. Followed that all the way up and ended up with 1175mv for 1.3ghz and she's stable.
Going to let it run for awhile, best to get some results, and test them out real world for awhile. I would try -50mv first on all frequencies to start. I cannot see much chance of instability doing this.
1.3ghz = (-50mv)
1.2ghz = (-75mv)
1.1ghz = (-75mv)
1.0ghz = (-75mv) (-100 was definitely not stable and had lots of freezes/reboots)
800mhz = (-175mv)
456mhz = (-225mv)
216mhz = (-250mv)
Faux .19
Alien Rom
d00 tegrapart
I have only overclocked to 1.2ghz because I have no need for anything more and probably don't even need that sort of overclock. My undervolt settings are heavily tested for 1gz and down but barely tested above that.
tapeworm_george said:
1.3ghz = 1175mv (-50mv)
1.2ghz = 1075mv (-75mv)
1.1ghz = 975mv (-75mv)
1.0ghz = 900mv (-75mv) (-100 was definitely not stable and had lots of freezes/reboots)
800mhz = 800mv (-175mv)
456mhz = 625mv (-225mv)
216mhz = 525mv (-250mv)
Faux .19
Alien Rom
d00 tegrapart
I have only overclocked to 1.2ghz because I have no need for anything more and probably don't even need that sort of overclock. My undervolt settings are heavily tested for 1gz and down but barely tested above that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I totally left out the different tegraparts, nice reminder hehe. Looks like you have a really nice SoC there. Best one I have seen yet. Just tried your lower end settings for 456 and 216, no reboots yet.
I was trying to come up with a way to test each individual clockspeed. Came up with this.
Charge your phone up to 100% (gets her nice and hot) then set a profile for anything below 99% battery to lock at 216mhz, 456mhz, 800mhz, and so on. Then test using the stress test inside SetCPU, make sure to set your screen time out to "never" as well.
I am quite sure this will work. I will test and re post.
Can SOMEBODY PLEASE tell me how to overclock this phone? I've looked all over kingdom come for a tut but can't find anything except the 1.4GHz kernel module that doesn't even work. Help would be much appreciated
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Gfrt94yn said:
Can SOMEBODY PLEASE tell me how to overclock this phone? I've looked all over kingdom come for a tut but can't find anything except the 1.4GHz kernel module that doesn't even work. Help would be much appreciated
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That 1.4ghz kernel never worked.
In order to overclock you need a kernel that supports it, there is one available in the dev section. Its made by faux.
Gfrt94yn said:
Can SOMEBODY PLEASE tell me how to overclock this phone? I've looked all over kingdom come for a tut but can't find anything except the 1.4GHz kernel module that doesn't even work. Help would be much appreciated
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does nobody read the N00B Guide any more.
To clarify the -100mV thing..... does this -100mV range apply to reduction values or to the actual voltages all remaining within 100mV of eachother?
ChaosMinionX said:
To clarify the -100mV thing..... does this -100mV range apply to reduction values or to the actual voltages all remaining within 100mV of eachother?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reduction values.
Tried your value but it hang and rebooted
tapeworm_george said:
1.3ghz = (-50mv)
1.2ghz = (-75mv)
1.1ghz = (-75mv)
1.0ghz = (-75mv) (-100 was definitely not stable and had lots of freezes/reboots)
800mhz = (-175mv)
456mhz = (-225mv)
216mhz = (-250mv)
Faux .19
Alien Rom
d00 tegrapart
I have only overclocked to 1.2ghz because I have no need for anything more and probably don't even need that sort of overclock. My undervolt settings are heavily tested for 1gz and down but barely tested above that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
xUmaRix said:
Tried your value but it hang and rebooted
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which tegrapart do you have?
d00
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Not all phones will end up being able to handle the same undervolting or overclocking.
These are guidelines only and it looks like my phone is very capable of extreme undervolting down low. I actually think I'm going to back these off just a little bit even though my phone remains stable just for peace of mind.
Tegrapart - 1100
Kernel - Faux's 0.1.9 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1175mv (-100mv)
1.2ghz = 1075mv (-100mv)
1.1ghz = 975mv (-100mv)
1.0ghz = 900mv (-75mv)
800mhz = 800mv (-250mv)
456mhz = 625mv (-275mv)
216mhz = 525mv (-300mv)
Tegrapart - d00 : 100 : 800
Kernel - Faux's 0.19 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1250mv (-50mv)
1.2ghz = 1150mv (-50mv)
1.1ghz = 1050mv (-50mv)
1.0ghz = 950mv (-50mv)
800mhz = 850mv (-50mv)
456mhz = 750mv (-50mv)
216mhz = 700mv (-50mv)
Just trying undervolting out. Scored a 4500 on Quadrant.
I'll keep trying different volts over the next couple days
d3athsd00r said:
Tegrapart - 1100
Kernel - Faux's 0.1.9 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1175mv (-100mv)
1.2ghz = 1075mv (-100mv)
1.1ghz = 975mv (-100mv)
1.0ghz = 900mv (-75mv)
800mhz = 800mv (-250mv)
456mhz = 625mv (-275mv)
216mhz = 525mv (-300mv)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your 800 and below uv's probably don't work unless faux did away with the 100mv stepping.
Tegrapart - d00
Kernel - Faux's 0.19 Unified
Build - Alien Beta 4
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1175mv (-125mv)
1.2ghz = 1100mv (-100mv)
1.1ghz = 1050mv (-50mv)
1.0ghz = 950mv (-50mv)
800mhz = 850mv (-50mv)
456mhz = 750mv (-50mv)
216mhz = 650mv (-100mv)
(still experimenting), this is 100% stable right now
spitefulcheerio said:
Tegrapart - d00 : 100 : 800
Kernel - Faux's 0.19 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1250mv (-50mv)
1.2ghz = 1150mv (-50mv)
1.1ghz = 1050mv (-50mv)
1.0ghz = 950mv (-50mv)
800mhz = 850mv (-50mv)
456mhz = 750mv (-50mv)
216mhz = 700mv (-50mv)
Just trying undervolting out. Scored a 4500 on Quadrant.
I'll keep trying different volts over the next couple days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(dont know if I should make a new post but here's my new setup)
Tegrapart - d00 : 100 : 800
Kernel - Faux's 0.19 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1200mv (-100mv)
1.2ghz = 1100mv (-100mv)
1.1ghz = 1000mv (-100mv)
1.0ghz = 925mv (-75mv)
800mhz = 800mv (-100mv)
456mhz = 700mv (-100mv)
216mhz = 650mv (-100mv)
With this I ended up scoring a 4700 in quadrant. 200 better than my previous setup
Edit:
Tegrapart - d00 : 100 : 800
Kernel - Faux's 0.19 CM7
Build - CM7 Pre-Beta 3
Overclock: 1.3ghz
1.3ghz = 1225mv (-75mv)
1.2ghz = 1125mv (-75mv)
1.1ghz = 1025mv (-75mv)
1.0ghz = 950mv (-75mv)
800mhz = 825mv (-75mv)
456mhz = 725mv (-75mv)
216mhz = 675mv (-75mv)
New setup because my phone started getting unstable. This is much better. I'm gonna start testing each frequency seperately.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
pukemon said:
your 800 and below uv's probably don't work unless faux did away with the 100mv stepping.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
And is there a way to check the current voltage?
There is a 100 mv limit between steps. I.e. from one step is -75 the next step can't be more than -175. But as I mentioned faux might've overcome that. If not, then your low end voltages are only 100 less than lowest voltage above that.
I voided my warranty and your mum.
tpart: d00
Kernel: Faux 1.7
build: gobstopper 2.3.4
o/c: 1.1Ghz
-25 top to bottom causes hang/reboot as soon as I open the market.

[GB][KERNELS][26-APR-12][v1.34]Difference between each KERNEL on benchmarks,same ROM

BIG DISCLAIMER WARNING:
This thread is for all GINGERBREAD ROM's (SENSE), and their RESPECTIVE KERNELS.
THESE KERNELS DO NOT WORK ON ICE CREAM SANDWICH (Or rather, not tested but please don't try)
THE ZIPS in the ATTACHMENTS section are also for GINGERBREAD, and not ICE CREAM SANDWICH
PLEASE READ THIS OPENING POST BEFORE FLASHING!!
PLEASE DONT BRICK YOUR PHONE
Hello everyone,
This is the GSM kernel comparisons thread where I have done some comparisons between each kernel and jotted down their differences.
Basically I ran some tests for gaming, antutu and will do more later such as battery life during idle. I also examine default clock speeds and their voltage, to provide a show difference between kernel voltages (affect battery drain?)
NEW: I added more tests by requests, and also narrow down to better performing kernels in terms of their various departments such as Performance, Battery, Graphics and Overall
The device
HTC EVO 3D [GSM] http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_evo_3d-3901.php
HBOOT 1.49.00.11
Radio 10.55.9020.00U
S-ON (So I use FlashImageGUI.apk) Thanks joeykrim http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1192527
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM:
★ ROMeOS3D ★ UNSENSLATED [04/04 [v1.3.4b-FINAL] (-SENSE,+RTL,+BEATS,+BATT) [100% BUGS-FREE] by monx®
Many Thanks! I use your ROM daily.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The games
Aftermath XHD (Lighting, Multitouch)
Shadowgun Not THD!(Just intense graphics, FPS)
Where is my water?(Portrait base game, Physics)
NFS Shift 3D *Not on market =.= (3D, Intense Racing)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmark apps :
Antutu 2.6
Nenamark 2.2
Smartbench 2012 v1.0.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The sequence of test;
Reboot
Flash Kernel
Clear Cache
Clear Dalvik
Boot up
Settle
System Tuner
Governor Set as Performance (CPU Adjust Min 384Mhz)
System Tuner (CPU Adjust Max 1.51Ghz )
Antutu Benchmark without SD card
System Tuner (CPU Adjust Max 1.18Ghz)
Antutu Benchmark without SD card
-------------------------------------------------------
Added test for Nenamark 2
Added test for Nenamark 2 (Second run)
Added test for Smartbench 2012
The battery test:
Charge to 100%
Leave phone idle completely
Edge is ON
Auto Sync is ON
No mail syncs
Widgets are manually updated, except Weather every 12 hours
Left alone for 5-6 hours (During my sleep)
No special SCREEN OFF profiles or governors or CPU speed changes
Interactive governor 384-1.2Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The MOVIE test:
Charge to 100%
Set CPU speed to 384-1180
Set Governor to INTERACTIVE
Ensure mobile data is turned ON
Ensure EDGE is turned ON. (2G) So we still have some sort of daily connectivity.
Ensure there is no UNDERVOLTAGE
Browse to HD movie : FAST 5 (Yes our ROM is Fast and Furious 5x )
Check start time
Open using default Gallery App
Play for 1 hour (check battery drain, if im awake but usually not)
Play for 2 hours & 10 minutes (complete movie)
Check end time
Check logs for battery drain %
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU Drivers
Main page talk can be found here ; http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1567033
The GPU drivers that "supposedly" increases performance.
Please do a COMPLETE BACKUP before installing. I am not responsible for this
GPU drivers - http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=967741&d=1332842958
Old GPU drivers - http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=967742&d=1332842958
There are the GPU drivers from the main page, and not the SAMSUNG-EGL drivers by Leedroid.
13 April 2012
I attached the SAMSUNG-EGL drivers by Leedroid as well, and its so far -
Better performance
Better UI experience
Better FPS in benchmarks
No disadvantages yet... so looks good for all of us
Works on the following Kernels
Anryl 10.07
Leedroid 5.4.0
Unity3b
RLS004
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FAST CHARGE
Fast charge link ;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1580553 by chad0989
All credits to the developer chad0989, and people who tested, and the people who made the kernels possible
Flash kernel of your choice
Unity3b - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24684226&postcount=29 by chad0989
LEEDROID 5.4 kernel - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24795813&postcount=48 by ozkaya (S-ON users seem to break WIFI, unable to find out how to fix this)
Anryl 10.08 - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24849681 by chad0989 & anryl
Anthrax RLS005 - Infected FORUM
Install Incredicontrol
Turn on [v] FORCE FAST CHARGE
Connect USB cable
Results from me,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24786155&postcount=47
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Notes
"My ROM is faster than yours in arguement". Yes, I agree all ROM's out there have different readings and probably different glitches, performance, battery life and is also based on what apps you have installed. This is just the baseline because I use the same ROM for all benchmarks, but different kernels.
Numbers might vary , thats why I didnt include SD card test. Class 2,4,6 10 across different SD card sizes, and cluster block size varies. Antutu uses a 300MB file to test your speeds. For me, thats not concrete or consistent.
Give or take , I ran the test multiple amounts of times using same configuration only to see a variance of 50 points on total score, which is negligible
CORE2 is not enabled via Leedroid Tweaks(I prefer battery life). I am convinced explicitly turning on second CORE will greatly improve Antutu benchmarks though. Perhaps?
Voltages affect battery life, indirectly. Adjusting your voltage lower could make it unstable, however save battery. As you can see, the stock kernel voltages are the SAFEST HTC configurations. Lower at your own risk.
By saying glitches in gaming, it usually means it has problems rendering, supporting multi touch, artifacts or just any deformation of 2D/3D. It can be minor, and can be major. I have yet to specify to what degree. NEW: A reboot usually cures this problem and yet to fully test it. Another cause of glitches can be caused by Go Locker. Freezing or uninstalling this app does remove graphic glitches.
I linked direct downloads only if the developer and releaser direct linked it. Its best to visit the thread of discussion and read there for more information. Links might die and get replaced, removed and I will monitor as much as I can
Slide to wake kernel sources were finally implemented in Anryl 10.03 above, and leedroid 5.x.x above. Use Ponury Gesture Mod from [email protected] to get it.
I disregarded Smartbench 2012 (Gaming Index) because they are all similiar, with a variance of 100 points at most between each kernel, and each clock speed whether 1.2Ghz or 1.5Ghz
Battery voltage is between 3.2v (0%) to 4.335mv (100%). HTC seems to report voltage correctly, but not -ma drain. For example, at 4.1mv battery is at 90% and 4.0mv, battery is 80% (consistently)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to tell proper battery %?
This is during drain, and not charging. Charging should always be additional 200mv
4335mv 100%
4000mv 80%
3800mv 60%
3600mv 40%
3500mv 20%
3400mv 0% (near empty)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My configuration for daily usage
ENABLE ALWAYS ON MOBILE DATA = OFF
WIFI = OFF
MOBILE DATA = ON
NETWORK MODE = GSM ONLY
LOCATION WIRELESS NETWORK = OFF
LOCATION GPS = OFF
BACKGROUND DATA = ON
AUTO SYNC = OFF (On when you need it)
POWER EFFICIENCY = ON
POWER SAVER = OFF
BLUETOOTH = OFF
DATE & TIME = MANUAL
PHONE FINDER = OFF
BACKUP MY SETTINGS = OFF
AUTOMATIC RESTORE = OFF
ANIMATIONS = ON
DISPLAY TIMEOUT = 60 sec (Personal preference between 30-60 seconds)
BRIGHTNESS = 20 %
MONITORING TOOLS = Mine is Usage Timelines free, CPU Usage Monitor Paid
CPU DAEMON = NO
LATITUDE = OFF
WIFI NETWORK NOTIFICATION = OFF
BEST WIFI PERFORMANCE = OFF Under Settings > Wireless > Wifi Settings > PRESS MENU BUTTON > Advanced
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MY VDD LEVELS
Yes this is my voltages, I use on every kernel, These voltatges were NOT USED during tests, but after im done with tests and stability checks, I apply these voltages for my daily use
Apply at your own risk.
Is generally
-50uv from anryl 10.07 for 192-1180 (stable for me)
-25uv from anryl 10.07 for 1180-1510 (stable for me)
-0 uv from unity3b 1510 to 1782 (i left it at stock, this is overclocking already and i dont support it, neither wish to lower voltages here to maintain stability)
and imported to Leedroid and Unity3b
I saved this profile, and applied to every kernel and seems fine for me
Apply at your risk!
192000: 750000
310500: 775000
384000: 775000
432000: 800000
486000: 800000
540000: 825000
594000: 825000
648000: 850000
702000: 850000
756000: 875000
810000: 875000
864000: 900000
918000: 900000
972000: 900000
1026000: 925000
1080000: 950000
1134000: 950000
1188000: 975000
1242000: 1025000
1296000: 1050000
1350000: 1075000
1404000: 1075000
1458000: 1075000
1512000: 1100000
1566000: 1200000
1620000: 1225000
1674000: 1250000
1728000: 1275000
1782000: 1325000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC default kernel
Monx has created a STOCK flashable kernel on his webpage but I am unsure whether its flashable to other ROM's.
I used his package, where he claimed it was STOCK kernel
You would have to register @ http://romeos.monx.biz/ though
Downloads, Android, Romeos Shooter_U, Romeos addons, ROMeOS3D_STOCK_DEFAULT_Kernel_unsecured_signed.zip
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1250mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1025mv
Battery: Battery doesn't have % jumps and has proper readings.
Battery Test : 1% for every 60 minutes (average)
Estimated ma : -12ma to -22ma
Movie Test : 100% to 68%
Performance : Good
Gaming: Gaming is OK. No glitches.
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 677
CPU INTEGER 1560
CPU FLOAT POINT 692
2D 294
3D 1106
DATABASE I/O 275
Total (4604)
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD(n/a)
Stock Kernel cannot be "overclocked" to 1.5Ghz
RAM N/A
CPU INTEGER N/A
CPU FLOAT POINT N/A
2D N/A
3D N/A
DATABASE I/O N/A
Total (n/a)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Leedroid 5.4.0
by Leedroid
Download: http://leedroid.ftp.rshost.eu/Shooter-Kernels/LeeDrOiD_Evo-3D-GSM_V5.4-FINAL-GB-KERNEL.zip provided by Leedroid
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1175mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1050mv
Battery: 99-90% seems to drain quickly, then 90 below to 0 drains slowly and normal. However, during use, the system is really responsive, and battery drain is slow being consistent. I noticed that the system reports the wrong % of battery as well, making occasional jumps between %. I evaluated use for a whole 12 hours (9am-9pm) and battery was at about 30% remaining. Pretty decent since it was out most of the time replying whats app
Battery Test : 1% every 55 minutes during idle.
Estimated ma: -12ma-29ma
Movie Test : 100% to 64%
Performance : Feels really as the fastest, exiting and entering apps. Probably the fastest in my observation and gut feel. However for this performance, I believe some battery life was compromised. Im not sure but its definitely apparent.
Gaming : So far no issues
Issues : Setting 1.89Ghz immediately causes freeze. Well thats expected
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 790
CPU INTEGER 1810
CPU FLOAT POINT 789
2D 294
3D 930
DATABASE I/O 225
Total (4838)
Nenamark 2 : 25.3 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 36.9 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1183
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 861
CPU INTEGER 2007
CPU FLOAT POINT 869
2D 296
3D 1224
DATABASE I/O 325
Total (5582)
Nenamark 2 : 31.6 ~ 31.7 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 39.9 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1964
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unity3b
by M-deejay
Download : http://www.multiupload.com/NX8BV82PQW
or on his thread posted here ; http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=22560256&postcount=984
Used to be very famous on HD2 as well! Many thanks!
User input : -75mV stable by neol23, here
User configuration for Unity3b by neol23 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21880484&postcount=4514
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1200mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1087.5mv
Battery: Seems to be great, but only had 2 days to test.
Battery Test : 1% every 80 minutes during idle.
Estimated ma: -9 to -15 ma drain. Second tests proves this is very consistent, and good. Kernel enters "deep sleep" rapidly
Movie test : 100% to 69%
Performance : Decent and responsive. Other kernels are a tad faster, but its not even noticeable
Gaming: Slight bugs in games. Glitches. Artifacts occurred. Multitouch issues.
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 726
CPU INTEGER 1590
CPU FLOAT POINT 689
2D 295
3D 1107
DATABASE I/O 320
Total (4727)
Nenamark 2 : 25.2 FPS ~ 25.3 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1422
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 807
CPU INTEGER 1791
CPU FLOAT POINT 790
2D 295
3D 1092
DATABASE I/O 350
Total (5125)
Nenamark 2 : 26.5 FPS ~ 26.6 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 792-802 (I ran this a few times, and yet got this low score) Puzzling...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anryl 10.07 and Anryl 10.08
by Anryl
Download 10.07 : http://www.4shared.com/zip/sOw0Fwbx/akernel_v1007.html
or
Download 10.08 : http://www.4shared.com/zip/wV5CKc2u/akernel_v1008.html
He is continuing the work of Kamma
Recompile and uses latest sources.
10.08 is an extension to 10.07 with FAST CHARGE.
For Kamma's kernel results, look at Post 3 (The Vault)
For Anryl kernel old results, look at Post 3 (The Vault)
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1125 mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1025 mv
Battery: Seems to be amazing, without Ponury Gesture during light/medium use. No erratic battery drops. Definitely can last a full day on EDGE. Observed that the kernel gets stuck at MIN CPU speed for 7 seconds after waking up from DEEP SLEEP. OC DAEMON is supposed to fix this.
Battery Test : 1% every 60 minutes during idle. (Updated and second test done)
Estimated ma : -14 to -19ma estimated drain
Movie test : 100% to 67%
Performance : Feels really fast but comes in 2nd compared to Leedroid 5.3.8
Gaming : OK, better than anryl 10.06. Smooth and decent all around.
Issues : CPU speed gets stuck at MIN FREQ for about 7-10 seconds after waking up from deep-sleep. This is where OC-daemon is supposed to fix, hence its a known issue in most kernels. Only Smartassv2 fixes this 50% of the time, and Smartassv2 is not stable for our EVO3D
Recommended Configuration
-50mv by Jcsy (stable 1.2 and 1.5)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=23570246
-62.5mv by Travex_
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23520287&postcount=1024
Battery can last thru 12 hours easily, pushing 20 hours as well.
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 692
CPU INTEGER 1594
CPU FLOAT POINT 692
2D 296
3D 1153
DATABASE I/O 215
Total (4642) down 4 points from 10.05 kernel
Nenamark 2 : 28.0 FPS ~ 28.1 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/GPU drivers : 33.7 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 35.6 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1226 (Up from 1199 on anryl 10.05)
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 789
CPU INTEGER 1813
CPU FLOAT POINT 798
2D 296
3D 1208
DATABASE I/O 360
Total (5630)
Nenamark 2 : 28.1 FPS ~ 28.3 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/GPU drivers : 36.1 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 35.6 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1399
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS005
by chad.goodman
Wrongly accused of stealing peoples code for other HTC devices. Has decided to move to another forum, and only allow grown ups to use his kernel.
chad.goodman's disclaimer
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25287750&postcount=241
Register and look for chad.goodman's latest kernel download for our device Problems or bugs, let him know at his thread. Not here.
Code:
This thread is intended to be viewable by members of infectedrom.com only. If there is a security flaw that allows you to read this, and you are not a member of infectedrom.com, you are not authorized to use the "software package" and should leave this page immediately. Thank You.
[B]http://forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php/1162-KERNEL-Private-Kernel-Download-Thread[/B]
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: x mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: x mv
Battery: In testing the Idle drain was HIGH. Make no mistake, idle for 2-3 hours easily drained 10% which is about 3% per hour. This was during sleep!
Battery Test : x% every x minutes during idle
Estimated ma : -x ma to -x ma
Movie Test : x% to x%
Performance : Feels slower than Leedroid 5.4.0, faster than Anryl 10.08
Gaming : After reboot, games seems to work fine. Multitouch issues go away after proper reboot.
Issues : Secondary core seems to hit 1.53GHZ even when set to lower frequencies, and INTERACTIVE. In some situations, CORE0 is at 384mhz, but CORE1 is at 1530mhz. While this is not always, you also want to always have your secondary CORE at the same speed as what you configured the MAX.
Its the only kernel with SMARTASSV2, and its own INTELLIANTHRAX governor which previously were reported to be unstable as well.
Sweep to wake causes a battery pull in any case
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 807
CPU INTEGER 1850
CPU FLOAT POINT 805
2D 256
3D 1066
DATABASE I/O 235
Total (5019)
Nenamark 2 : x.x FPS ~ xx.x FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 34.7 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1937 (VERY HIGH FOR OUR DEVICE)
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 911
CPU INTEGER 2075
CPU FLOAT POINT 912
2D 296
3D 1152
DATABASE I/O 325
Total (5671)
Nenamark 2 : x.x FPS ~ x.x FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 35.0 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 2167 (really highest for us now)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personal Summary
Since every kernel seems to be similar, below are my observations between all. These are the KINGS in the following department
BEST OVERALL PERFORMANCE - LEEDROID 5.4.0
BEST OVERALL BATTERY - MEDEEJAY UNITY3B
BEST OVERALL STABILITY - ANRYL 10.07/10.08
BEST OVERALL GRAPHIC - ANTHRAX GSM-SENSE-RLS004
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ToDoList
[DONE]Clean up formatting
[DONE]EXCEL method comparison
[DONE]Nenamark2
[DONE]Smartbench 2012
[DONE]Battery Life during idle (this is going to be a tough one)
[DONE]Links to kernels, kernel owners
[DONE]Thanks and appreciation to all kernel developers
[DONE]Thanks and appreciation to ROM developer
[DONE]New kernels
[DONE]New tests on new kernels
You tell me
The disclaimer
I will follow up the thread and update as I have time, or as long as I have the same ROM (which I dont usually flash too often) or same phone
If you dislike my post, cross-reference, findings, let me know, especially if you have been affected by this post I will do the necessary to adjust it. My apologies if I have done so in advance.
If you disagree with my information above, let me know and I will add,change or remove it.
If you found something interesting about any of the kernels, discuss and let me know. I am sure others will want to know as well
I am not responsible for anything above, and damage, warranty,legal and etc is on your own self doing. I will remove them immediately when it affects any of the mentioned above.
I dont claim these are 100% accurate, and variance might be there. Use at own discretion, especially voltages.
Undervolting below HTC stock mV, and overclocking above 1.5Ghz is at your own peril. By default, our CPU are clocked at 1.5Ghz. HTC just downclocked it to 1.2Ghz. Anything above that, and you are on your own.
384mhz seem to be the most stable low point. 192mhz caused random reboots or bugs during lockscreen, in call etc.
Sony XLOUD is really LOUD. However, restoring using the uninstall.zip breaks all AUDIO from Music apps, or beats related.
Reserved For change logs / updates
26 April 2012 v1.34
NEW: Added gaming observations to RLS5
NEW: Added issues to RLS5 regarding sweep to wake
NEW: Added issues to Anryl 10.07/10.08, which is known WAKE UP STUCK AT MIN FREQ
Added Anthrax RLS005 results section. This is probably a BETA kernel. Use at your own risk
Added Anthrax Antutu, Nenamark 2 and Smartbench 2012 results for 1.2GHZ. Note the smart bench results are quite high, falling slightly short of Leedroid's 5.4.0 clocked at 1.5GHZ.
Added Anthrax Antutu, Nenamark 2 and Smartbench 2012 results for 1.5GHZ.
Added issues discovered for RLS005
Added battery observations for RLS005
Post regarding xLOUD on the final disclaimer
Fixed typo
15 April 2012 v1.33
Fixed typo as 3.4v as 0%.
Added 10.08 kernel description
Added 10.08 kernel into FAST CHARGE
Added 10.07/10.08 observations regarding stuck at MIN CPU speed
Added Unity3b as supported under Samsung-EGL drivers, and GPU drivers
13 April 2012 v1.32
Added Samsung-EGL results to Anryl 10.07, 1.2ghz and 1.5ghz had same results.
Added Samsung-EGL results to Leedroid 5.4.0, 1.2ghz and 1.5ghz had better results.
Added Samsung-EGL results to Antrhax RLS004, 1.2ghz and 1.5ghz also had good results.
Added Samsung-EGL driver description and credit to Leedroid
Added FORCE FAST CHARGE section
Added results observed by FAST CHARGE
Added my voltage configuration which I deem stable, that runs on any kernel tested (Leedroid 5.4.0, Unity3b, RLS004 and Anryl 10.07)
Please thank the people who created, tested and developed this for us (Hence I linked full posts). USB cables are now FULL chargers!
8 April 2012 v1.31
Added RLS004 kernel battery observations
Added RLS004 battery drain estimates, and battery drain per hour
Added RLS004 movie test results
Made changelogs into Code, past April 2012, to respect your mouse scroll
7 April 2012 v1.30
Added attachments to front page. *If you think its wrong, let me know, I will remove them*
5 April 2012 v1.29
Added movie test results for STOCK KERNEL
Added GPU drivers section
Added results for NEW GPU drivers on Anryl 10.07 for Nenamark 2
Tested all the games, Aftermath, NFS, Shadowgun and Where is my water. Doesn't seem to have performance gain.
Camera functional
Removed some typo
1 April 2012 v1.28
Added Anthrax RLS04
Moved older Anthrax kernel to The Vault
Added results for RLS04 for Nenamark
Added results for RLS04 for Antutu
Added results for RLS04 for Smartbench 2012
Code:
29 March 2012 v1.27
[LIST]
[*]Added movie test results to Unity3b
[*]Added performance results to Unity3b
[*]Fixed typo
[*]To test cile381 kernel next
[/LIST]
28 March 2012 v1.26
[LIST]
[*]Added movie test results to Kamma v1.0 but remains in The Vault
[*]Added Issue list to Anthrax GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830 for 3D camera (LAG)
[*]Edited main post for more typo's
[/LIST]
27 March 2012 v1.25
[LIST]
[*]Added results for leedroid 5.3.8 movie test
[*]Created "PERSONAL SUMMARY" at the bottom of the tests
[*]Moved Excel Comparison to The Vault (too old and not going to be updated, pointless)
[*]Changed Unityv3b to Unity3b (typo)
[/LIST]
26 March 2012 v1.24
[LIST]
[*]Added results for anryl 10.07 movie test
[*]Adjust typo
[*]Adjust some explanations
[*]Redid Leedroid 5.3.8 tests
[*]Corrected some Leedroid 5.3.8 kernel results
[/LIST]
25 March 2012 v1.23
[LIST]
[*]Anthrax RLS001a by chad.goodman moved to The Vault Post 3
[*]Added THE MOVIE TEST
[*]Begin tests on GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830.zip
[*]Added results for Movie Test on GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830.zip
[*]Added results for Antutu, Nenamark, Smartbench on GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830.zip
[*]Next to observe battery usage during idle, drains.
[*]Notice some scores didnt really increase, instead decreased when using 1.5GHZ.
[*]Converted Leedroid 5.3.5 to 5.3.8, similiar results
[*]Fixed some typo
[*]Fixed and explained some settings
[*]Included a PERFORMANCE: observation for Leedroid 5.3.8
[*]Included a PERFORMANCE: observation for GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830
[*]Included a PERFORMANCE: observation for Anryl 10.07
[/LIST]
23 March 2012 v1.22
[LIST]
[*]Added chad.goodman's [url]http://forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php/1162-KERNEL-Private-Kernel-Download-Thread[/url]
[/LIST]
18 March 2012 v1.21
[LIST]
[*]Added battery observations based on mv, and compare to %
[*]Battery results for -50UV on ANRYL 10.07 added
[*]Added settings to enhance battery longevity guide
[/LIST]
14 March 2012 v1.20
[LIST]
[*]Added recommended configurations for Anryl 10.07
[*]Will add battery test results after UV applied
[/LIST]
6 March 2012 v1.19
[LIST]
[*]Added Leedroid 5.3.5 battery observations
[*]Added Leedroid 5.3.5 battery drain
[*]Changed title name from [GSM][KERNELS][Date][Version]Difference between each kernel via Antutu, and more...
*This thread is no longer just about Antutu or benchmarks, its about the different kernels and observations. Its all on the same user setup, same ROM, same apps and same sync configurations to provide a consistent result.
*Thread name changed also to reflect that its the SAME ROM, as I get PM's regarding better results in different ROM, better battery on different ROM's etc
[/LIST]
4 March 2012 v1.18
[LIST]
[*]Added Leedroid 5.3.5 kernel
[*]Added Leedroid 5.3.5 results for all tests except Battery drain %
[/LIST]
19 February 2012 v1.17
[LIST]
[*]Battery test for Anryl 10.07 returned more positive results
[*]Battery doesnt drop erratically like other kernels for Anryl 10.07
[*]Estimated 24 hours of light/medium use(averaging 5% per hour)
[*]Discovered that graphic glitches can be caused by Go Locker (Thanks Monx)
[/LIST]
16 February 2012 v1.16
[LIST]
[*]To test Anryl kernel 11.03
[*]Added anryl 10.07 battery results (Tested across 5 hours of sleep)
[*]To move Leedroid 3.70 results to The Vault
[*]Added Leedroid 4.2.1 results for Antutu, Nenamark, Smartbench
[/LIST]
15 February 2012 v1.15
[LIST]
[*]Added anryl kernel 10.07
[*]Moved anryl 10.05 to The Vault
[*]Added Nenamark 2 results for anryl 10.07
[*]Added Smartbench 2012 results for anryl 10.07
[*]Added Antutu results for anryl 10.07
[*]Added XDA mirror for Unity3b kernel, since multiupload is down
[/LIST]
13 February 2012 v1.14
[LIST]
[*]Added Nenamark 2 results for anryl 10.05 on 1.5GHZ
[*]Added Smartbench 2012 results for anryl 10.05 on 1.5GHZ
[*]Added Antutu results for anryl 10.05 on 1.5GHZ
[/LIST]
12 February 2012 v1.13
[LIST]
[*]Updated Antutu to 2.6
[*]Updated ROMEOS ROM to 1.30a (with PATCH)
[*]Rerunning tests to check consistency (seems similiar, or consistent hence ROM didnt affect output)
[*]Rerunning tests on Anryl 10.05 kernel
[*]Moved Anryl 10.01 kernel to The Vault
[*]Updated Antutu, Nenamark 2, Smartbench 2012 for Anryl on 1.2GHZ
[*]Noticed lower voltages set for Anryl 10.05 as compared to Anryl 10.01
[/LIST]
5 February 2012 v1.12
[LIST]
[*]Battery tests for HTC Stock Kernel
[*]Estimated Battery Drain for HTC Stock Kernel
[/LIST]
2 February 2012 v1.11
[LIST]
[*]Battery tests for Anryl 10.01
[*]Estimated ma drain for Anryl 10.01
[*]Gaming observations for Anryl 10.01
[*]To do tests on HTC STOCK kernel next
[/LIST]
1 February 2012 v1.10
[LIST]
[*]Smartbench 2012 results added for Anryl 10.01
[/LIST]
1 February 2012 v1.09
[LIST]
[*]Battery Life during Idle and Sleep for Anthrax RLS001a
[*]Estimated -ma drain by Battery Monitor Widget for Anthrax RLS001a
[*]Update formatting for NEW KERNEL by Anryl, based on Kamma v1.0, code name Akernel 10.01(More information on this kernel later)
[*]Created THE VAULT in Post 3 in this thread
[*]Moved Leedroid 3.60 kernel and Kamma v1.00 to the vault
[*]Added Notes #10 to opening post
[*]Updated formatting
[*]Added Excel Comparison Section
[*]Attached Excel Spreadsheet but only for v1.08. Latest kernels included/removed later
[*]Added results for Antutu for Anryl 10.01
[*]Added results for Nenamark 2 for Anryl 10.01
[/LIST]
30 January 2012 v1.08
[LIST]
[*]New discovery ; Graphic glitches caused by unclean kernel installation, cache and dalvik clearing.
[*]Resolved via reboot
[*]Requires more testing
[*]Modified and included this discovery in Notes #6
[/LIST]
30 January 2012 v1.07
[LIST]
[*]Battery Life during Idle and Sleep for Kamma 1.00 (Needs 1 more test)
[*]Estimated -ma drain by Battery Monitor Widget for Kamma 1.00
[*]Added Nenamark 2 results for Anthrax RSL001a
[*]Added Smartbench 2012 resutls for Anthrax RSL001a
[*]Added Notes #9, which was confirmed by me after testing all kernels
[/LIST]
29 January 2012 v1.06
[LIST]
[*]Battery Life during Idle and Sleep for Unity3b
[*]Estimated -ma drain by Battery Monitor Widget for Unity3b
[*]Added Nenamark 2 results for Kamma v1.00
[*]Updated Smartbench 2012 to v1.0.0
[*]Added Smartbench 2012 results for Kamma v1.00
[*]Added battery observations Kamma v1.00
[*]Updated gaming observations on Kamma v1.00
[/LIST]
28 January 2012 v1.05
[LIST]
[*]Battery Life during Idle and Sleep for Leedroid 3.70
[*]Estimated -ma drain by Battery Monitor Widget
[*]Nenamark 2 results added for Unity3b
[*]Smartbench 2012 results added for Unity3b
[/LIST]
28 January 2012 v1.04
[LIST]
[*]Nenamark 2 results added for Leedroid 3.70
[*]Smartbench 2012 results added for Leedroid 3.70
[/LIST]
27 January 2012 v1.03
[LIST]
[*]Artifacts in Unity3b in game : Frontline Commando discovered
[*]Included neol23 -75mv voltage configuration for Unity3b, where neol23 deem it stable.
[*]Included neol23 configuration from Leedroid ROM, with Unity3b. Important : Voltage configurations
[*]Included TODO list of Nenamark2 and Smartbench2012
[/LIST]
27 January 2012 v1.02
[LIST]
[*]Kernel names can be clicked to be redirected to the ROM/kernel main page
[*]Developer names included, with link to profile
[*]Direct download links included, for easier access (I hope I dont violate anything. If I do, I will take them down immediately)
[*]Slight history of the kernels, and what/why they are there
[/LIST]
27 January 2012 v1.01
[LIST]
[*]Added notes and points form
[*]Changed formatting
[*]linked ROM developer
[*]defined gaming glitches
[*]added more TODOLIST
[*]changed Anthraxv2 to Anthrax SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a
[*]more formatting (I know its not the best planned thread, I just pasted mostly from my notepad)
[/LIST]
27 January 2012 v1.00
[LIST]
[*]Basic frame formatting
[*]Antutu scores
[*]Gaming perspective
[*]more to come
[/LIST]
The Vault
Whats this for ?
Archived information, which is no longer needed in Opening Post
Information here would no longer be updated as they are not the latest kernels. We all like latest, but my point is that sometimes, latest doesnt mean best.
Though not latest, they might prove to be stable and better than others but would add much more work to compare each time.
Code:
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][B][U][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1245424"]Leedroid 4.2.1[/URL][/U][/B][/SIZE]
by Leedroid
Download: [url]http://leedroid.ftp.rshost.eu/Shooter-Kernels/LeeDrOiD_Evo-3D-GSM_V4.2.1-1.94GHz-KERNEL.zip[/url] provided by Leedroid
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1250mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1150mv[/U]
Battery: NA
Battery Test : NA
Estimated ma: NA
Gaming : Better than 3.70.
Issues : NA
[U][B]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/B][/U]
RAM 690
CPU INTEGER 1603
CPU FLOAT POINT 693
2D 255
3D 1149
DATABASE I/O 250
[B]Total (4636)[/B]dropped from leedroid 3.70
Nenamark 2 : [B]29.2 FPS ~ 29.3 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1238[/B]
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 790
CPU INTEGER 1804
CPU FLOAT POINT 800
2D 284
3D 1171
DATABASE I/O 320
[B]Total (5169)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B]31.5 FPS[/B] Finally a kernel above 31 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1482[/B]
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][B][U][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21835672&postcount=4381"]Leedroid 3.70[/URL][/U][/B][/SIZE]
by Leedroid
Download: [url]http://db.tt/SHTLBjsX[/url] provided by Leedroid
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1200mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1087.5mv[/U]
Battery: Great. Occasional % jumps but still correct readings after jumps in variance of 2-3%
Battery Test : 1% every 60 minutes during idle.
Estimated ma: -9 to -12 ma drain
Gaming : Better than 3.60. OK so far.
Issues : Noticing data drops. Not all the time, but there are..
Random reboots currently persists in Leedroid ROM. Not on mine, yet :D
[U][B]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/B][/U]
RAM 834
CPU INTEGER 1801
CPU FLOAT POINT 794
2D 295
3D 1149
DATABASE I/O 280
[B]Total (5153)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : 26.5 FPS ~ 26.6 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1581
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 931
CPU INTEGER 2025
CPU FLOAT POINT 886
2D 296
3D 1195
DATABASE I/O 370
[B]Total (5703)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B]27.5 FPS ~ 27.5 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1852[/B]
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][U][B]Leedroid 3.60[/B][/U][/SIZE]
by Leedroid
Download : [url]http://leedroid.ftp.rshost.eu/Shooter-Kernels/LeeDrOiD_Evo-3D-GSM_V3.6.0-1.94GHz-KERNEL.zip[/url]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1200mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1087.5mv[/U]
Battery: Great. Occasional % jumps but still correct readings after jumps
Gaming : Slight glitches here and there.
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 800
CPU INTEGER 1792
CPU FLOAT POINT 797
2D 294
3D 1143
DATABASE I/O 310
[B]Total (5136)[/B]
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD(5606)[/U][/B]
RAM 919
CPU INTEGER 2020
CPU FLOAT POINT 894
2D 289
3D 1169
DATABASE I/O 315
[B]Total (5606)[/B]
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][B][U][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1311812"]Kamma v1.0[/URL][/U][/B][/SIZE]
by [URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=319765"]kamma[/URL]
Download : [url]http://www.multiupload.com/X349UFSSFJ[/url]
His work has been discontinued because he bought a Galaxy Nexus
His work [B][U]might[/U][/B] be followed up and rebuild by anryl, [url]http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21797789&postcount=348[/url]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1250mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1150mv[/U]
Battery: In testing, seems to be amazing and great.
Battery Test : 1% every ~70 minutes during idle. Needs 1 more test though.
Estimated ma : -6ma to -9ma, occasionally -12ma
Performance : Similiar to anryl kernel for performance.
Movie Test : 100% to 64%
Gaming : No glitches. All games smooth, no glitches, no artifacts, like STOCK.
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 722
CPU INTEGER 1586
CPU FLOAT POINT 690
2D 295
3D 1163
DATABASE I/O 290
[B]Total (4746)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B]27.2 FPS ~ 27.3 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1296[/B]
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 826
CPU INTEGER 1799
CPU FLOAT POINT 768
2D 296
3D 1197
DATABASE I/O 375
[B]Total (5261)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B]28.6 FPS ~ 28.8 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1526[/B]
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][B][U][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21914565&postcount=2"]Anryl 10.01[/URL][/U][/B][/SIZE]
by [URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=410957"]Anryl[/URL]
Download : [url]http://www.4shared.com/zip/LQAQH8m4/akernel_v1001.html[/url]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1250 mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1150 mv[/U]
Battery: Good, but not great during use. Seems to drop rapidly (%)
Battery Test : 1% every 66 minutes during idle.
Estimated ma : -4 ma to -27ma
Gaming : Normal. As usual, glitches after first reboot, all seems OK.
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 709
CPU INTEGER 1547
CPU FLOAT POINT 678
2D 295
3D 1173
DATABASE I/O 270
[B]Total (4672)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B] 27.7 FPS ~ 27.8 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]978[/B]
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 810
CPU INTEGER 1770
CPU FLOAT POINT 777
2D 296
3D 1185
DATABASE I/O 345
[B]Total (5187)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B] 28.2 FPS ~ 28.2 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1406[/B]
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][B][U][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21914565&postcount=2"]Anryl 10.05[/URL][/U][/B][/SIZE]
by [URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=410957"]Anryl[/URL]
Download : [url]http://www.4shared.com/zip/qp60FXjh/akernel_v1005.html[/url]
He is continuing the work of Kamma :)
Recompile and uses latest sources.
For Kamma's kernel results, look at Post 3 (The Vault)
For Anryl kernel old results, look at Post 3 (The Vault)
CPU SPEED: [U]1.5GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1125 mv[/U]
CPU SPEED: [U]1.2GHZ[/U] VOLTAGE: [U]1025 mv[/U]
Battery: N/A (%)
Battery Test : N/A
Estimated ma : N/A
Gaming : OK after Reboot
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 650
CPU INTEGER 1564
CPU FLOAT POINT 689
2D 296
3D 1167
DATABASE I/O 280
[B]Total (4646)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B] 26.8 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1199 (Up from 978 on anryl 10.01)[/B]
[B][U]Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD[/U][/B]
RAM 877
CPU INTEGER 2042
CPU FLOAT POINT 888
2D 296
3D 1192
DATABASE I/O 335
[B]Total (5630)[/B]
Nenamark 2 : [B] 28.2 FPS ~ 28.4 FPS[/B]
Smartbench 2012 : [B]1087[/B](I ran this a few times, and yet got this low score) Puzzling... AGAIN similiar like UNITY3B
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
[SIZE="5"][U][B][URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1428588"]Anthrax SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a...already kanged[/URL][/B][/U][/SIZE]
by [URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=3862386"]chad.goodman[/URL]
Download: [url]http://www.androidfilehost.com/main/EVO_3D_Developers/Despicable.Me.Roms/KERNELS/[/url]
(show some support and click some ad's on link)
Register and look for chad.goodman's latest kernel for our device :)
[CODE]
http://forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php/1162-KERNEL-Private-Kernel-Download-Thread
For all general awareness,
Definition of "..already kanged.." from Urban Dictionary
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Kanged
1. To have one's developer code and work taken, manipulated, rebranded, and re-released by someone else with no credit.
Ultimate Droid kanged CyanogenMod by taking CM's code, theming the ROM, and then re-releasing it without taking out CM-specific easter eggs, and stripping out the credit and changelog for the CyanogenMod developers.
2. The act of having your meeting hijacked, in favor of a convoluted and meandering presentation of impractical concepts that can never be implemented. Also a term for a discussion that impacts you, but does not include you.
"I got Kanged at the new business presentation yesterday."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1250mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1187.5mv
Battery: Erratic sudden battery drops in %.
Battery Test : 1% every ~72 minutes during idle.
Estimated ma: -9ma, occasionally -14ma
Gaming :Slight bugs in games. Shadowgun artifacts. After reboot, seems OK.
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 710
CPU INTEGER 1527
CPU FLOAT POINT 684
2D 280
3D 1113
DATABASE I/O 265
Total (4579)
Nenamark 2 : 29.0 FPS ~ 29.1 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1368
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 797
CPU INTEGER 1753
CPU FLOAT POINT 768
2D 295
3D 1195
DATABASE I/O 395
Total (5203)
Nenamark 2 : 30.0 FPS ~ 30.2 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1402
[/QUOTE]
GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-032212_1830
by chad.goodman
Wrongly accused of stealing peoples code for other HTC devices. Has decided to move to another forum, and only allow grown ups to use his kernel.
chad.goodman's disclaimer
Register and look for chad.goodman's latest kernel download for our device Problems or bugs, let him know at his thread. Not here.
Code:
This thread is intended to be viewable by members of infectedrom.com only. If there is a security flaw that allows you to read this, and you are not a member of infectedrom.com, you are not authorized to use the "software package" and should leave this page immediately. Thank You.
[B]http://forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php/1162-KERNEL-Private-Kernel-Download-Thread[/B]
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1250mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1187.5mv
Battery: No more erratic battery drops. Requires more observations.
Battery Test : N/A
Estimated ma: -xxx ma to - xxx ma
Movie Test : 100% drop to 66%
Performance : Feels slower during use in normal conditions compared to Leedroid & Anryl kernels
Gaming : Multitouch seems to fault every few touches.
Issues : 3D camera lags with amaze cam 0.11
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 790
CPU INTEGER 1821
CPU FLOAT POINT 813
2D 294
3D 1189
DATABASE I/O 270
Total (5177)
Nenamark 2 : 30.3 FPS ~ 30.4 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 910
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 885
CPU INTEGER 2061
CPU FLOAT POINT 917
2D 296
3D 1230
DATABASE I/O 305
Total (5694)
Nenamark 2 : 30.3 FPS ~ 30.4FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 766
GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS04
by chad.goodman
Wrongly accused of stealing peoples code for other HTC devices. Has decided to move to another forum, and only allow grown ups to use his kernel.
chad.goodman's disclaimer
Register and look for chad.goodman's latest kernel download for our device Problems or bugs, let him know at his thread. Not here.
Code:
This thread is intended to be viewable by members of infectedrom.com only. If there is a security flaw that allows you to read this, and you are not a member of infectedrom.com, you are not authorized to use the "software package" and should leave this page immediately. Thank You.
[B]http://forums.infectedrom.com/showthread.php/1162-KERNEL-Private-Kernel-Download-Thread[/B]
CPU SPEED: 1.5GHZ VOLTAGE: 1250mv
CPU SPEED: 1.2GHZ VOLTAGE: 1187.5mv
Battery: Seems to be amazing during use, but in testing the Idle drain was HIGH.
Battery Test : 1% every 30 minutes during idle. (Updated and second test done)
Estimated ma : -25ma to -39ma (this is almost double of any other kernel)
Movie Test : 100% to 57%
Performance : Feels slower during use in normal conditions compared to Leedroid & Anryl kernels
Gaming : Gaming seems fine on the 4 games I used to test.
Antutu Benchmark at 1.2GHZ without SD
RAM 776
CPU INTEGER 1846
CPU FLOAT POINT 815
2D 296
3D 1157
DATABASE I/O 290
Total (5180)
Nenamark 2 : 27.1 FPS ~ 27.2 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 35.9 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 959
Antutu Benchmark at 1.5GHZ without SD
RAM 872
CPU INTEGER 1988
CPU FLOAT POINT 876
2D 296
3D 1189
DATABASE I/O 325
Total (5546)
Nenamark 2 : 28.1 FPS ~ 28.1 FPS
Nenamark 2 w/Samsung-EGL drivers : 37.8 FPS
Smartbench 2012 : 1423
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[/CODE]
Excel Comparison(Very old, revision 1.00)
Total size of 17KB
Excel Version updated to match 1.08 of the thread
Highlighted in GREEN (Highest for that particular task)
Highlighted in RED (Lowest for that particular task)
Yeah, very cool Idea.
That way it'll get a little clearer for the people which kernel to choose --> performance wise
I did something similar about a year ago for my DesireHD --> << press hard on this one >> (Linpack only).
Just one thing:
Maybe Antutu "only" isn't representative enough?
It is a synthetic benchmark isn't it.?
Does somebody have an idea how to bench a little closer to real life circumstances?
I see what you are getting at, but how a kernel works for one person does not say that much. When running antutu with the Anthrax V2 kernel @ 1.5Ghz I score 5829 (without SD) which is considerably higher than what you scored. In the end every device is different and will therefore score different and work better and worse with certain settings..
nice idea dude, but benchmarks are nothing you should believe in
Too bad you can't include chad's Qualcomm series in your comparaison. Oh well, Xda's loss.
Very good idea. Which Anthrax v2 kernel did you use: SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a.zip or GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-REV_005.zip? I believe GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-REV_005.zip is much more stable than SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a.zip.
Thanks for putting in so much work. I would be more interested in a battery drain benchmark. But good work.
Nice thread. I also am interested in seeing benchmarks for battery performance.
Thanks for time and effort put in, it helps give an idea of what each kernel is capable of.
locked & loaded
jcsy said:
Reserved For changelogs / updates
27 January 2012 v1.00
Basic frame formatting
Antutu scores
Gaming perspective
-more to come
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate,
I've. Always found leedroid. Kernel v1 is the fastest on any rom. I've tried
---------- Post added at 02:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:49 AM ----------
metamasterplay said:
Too bad you can't include chad's Qualcomm series in your comparaison. Oh well, Xda's loss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not xda's fault, there keeping legal and covering there own arses
Cant blame em, if your one of the few who kept them, u can use them
McKebapp said:
Yeah, very cool Idea.
That way it'll get a little clearer for the people which kernel to choose --> performance wise
I did something similar about a year ago for my DesireHD --> << press hard on this one >> (Linpack only).
Just one thing:
Maybe Antutu "only" isn't representative enough?
It is a synthetic benchmark isn't it.?
Does somebody have an idea how to bench a little closer to real life circumstances?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DNAxDREAMS said:
I see what you are getting at, but how a kernel works for one person does not say that much. When running antutu with the Anthrax V2 kernel @ 1.5Ghz I score 5829 (without SD) which is considerably higher than what you scored. In the end every device is different and will therefore score different and work better and worse with certain settings..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah every ROM is different. Every device performs differently with different ROM's ,
Best ROM here would beat my ROM out flat, but I used the same platform to test to give the difference between all of them Thats all
Flashmaniac said:
nice idea dude, but benchmarks are nothing you should believe in
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm aware that benchmarks ARE NOTHING, honestly. Made out of curiosity and to cure yours as well. They are a good representation only. Actual life performance varies big time, ask Mr. Iphone He had bad benchmarks everywhere and yet performed really well.
tmihai20 said:
Very good idea. Which Anthrax v2 kernel did you use: SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a.zip or GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-REV_005.zip? I believe GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-REV_005.zip is much more stable than SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a.zip.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i used "SHOOTERU-GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-RLS001a.zip"
i dont have "GSM-SENSE-AnthraX-2.6.38.6-REV_005.zip"
In his thread, chad.goodman mentioned
#2: If you happen to have my older kernels, please do not post links to them, or share them in public forum. I was legally ordered to pull them all, so I did. If you downloaded them before 8PM Pacific Standard Time on 1-3-2012, you are fine to use them as you see fit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I shall not violate his order, as I joined EVO3D section after this time
gav-collins1983 said:
Mate,
I've. Always found leedroid. Kernel v1 is the fastest on any rom. I've tried
---------- Post added at 02:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:49 AM ----------
It's not xda's fault, there keeping legal and covering there own arses
Cant blame em, if your one of the few who kept them, u can use them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont have v1. i joined EVO3D forum very much AFTER this was hidden
my opinion is that I use the same test bed on all tests. Meaning, if you use another ROM and test , it should be similiar for u as well for all different kernels, maybe +200 +300 more since its generally faster
perhaps my ROM has bugs in gaming, but AFAIK its quite toned down in terms of modifications and enhancements
I'm heading out, will modify this later
xb360 said:
Nice thread. I also am interested in seeing benchmarks for battery performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found that its hard to measure battery performance but so far i spotted an app called Drain guard on XDA which measures drain only during idle for u.
However % drains of each kernel varies greatly, some jumping a few % and staying at one % for ridiculous amounts of time has made me drop that idea, for now.
Need to find something more consistent, such as running a game for 10 minutes and measure drain, but even that won't be accurate since % is reported wrongly and voltage is jumps up and down. I know because i monitor this day and night. Any ideas?
---------------------Tapatalk ----------------------
Sent from my HD 2 running Hyperdroid CM 7 or just, my new HTC Evolution 3D running ROMeOS Unsensed
I found that kernel in the non-gpl folder, haven't tried it yet. Today I switch to Evo 3D as my primary phone, I am still using the stock kernel.
Hey guys am a new Evo User, come from Desire !
Is there an chance to get more information of the old kernels banned because of qualcomm?
What are the significant differences to the new ones.
Would be very glad for a private message with infos, or maybe somebody who has is it already is able to send it (via Mail)
jcsy said:
Reserved For changelogs / updates
...Included neol23 -75mv voltage configuration for Unity3b, where neol23 deem it stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please update with those custom kernel settings:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21880484&postcount=4514
Stable 100%, no reboots, autobacklight works on calls, no lags at all (games & tiping - set the MAX CPU Load to 80).
Tested to 1,51Ghz OC - higher could be unstable - not tested the UV settings, though .
Everything ON, except BT and GPS - u can see the battery life ...
Thanks,
updated with 1.03, and added you into the Unity3b section for user input.
what a great post there man amazing detailed information
i cant seem to find any other kernels other than the one on chad.goodman's site so i assume those were taken down already
missing 1.18Ghz screenshot though, but I would assume 1000mv, or 1025mv?
I doubt Antutu Benchmark will tell kernel's graphic performance, since its 2D and 3D benchmarks are too weak for modern devices.(most of phones have ~60fps cap.)
I recommend use Nenamark2 and Smartbench 2012 with "Performance" governor for more accurate results.
Added to my next TODOLIST for you
Thanks

Categories

Resources