Related
Hi Guys,
I consider myself noob and any type of help would be appreciated.
Can I mix Mik_os CM7 rom and Franco's 13.7 KERNEL? If its possible, What are the most simplest steps to do it?
same question. ^^
I tryed Gingerbread-2.3.4-rc2 @2011-05-22-21.00+GMT0 + Franco and didn't work. I think it will not work too.
Kheepur said:
Hi Guys,
I consider myself noob and any type of help would be appreciated.
Can I mix Mik_os CM7 rom and Franco's 13.7 KERNEL? If its possible, What are the most simplest steps to do it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have mixed various mik's CM7 with franco kernel and never had any problem, currently using beta CM7 6.5.1 with franco kernel 13.7.2
char101 said:
I have mixed various mik's CM7 with franco kernel and never had any problem, currently using beta CM7 6.5.1 with franco kernel 13.7.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the quick reply.
Few more questions.
1.Is it better or what?
2.Do I need to make partitions before installing the Kernel?
3.Do I need to wipe anything before installing the Kernel?
Greetings. As for me i think that mik's CM7 already has it's own Kernel optimized for CM7 so there is no need to flash another kernel like franco's which is i think most optimized for franco's void.devoid ROM. Also i did some benchmarking tests on AtuNtu. So on clean CM7 6.5.1 with native kernel , with CPU 600/245 i had 1326 result, after that i flashed franco's Kernel 13.7 , CPU 600/245 and i had 1136 result on benchmark. As for battery i dont know hadnt time to test both. But i really think that the best combination is just CM7 + libsqlite.so patch + franco's tweaks and none modifications for kernels.
Kheepur said:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Few more questions.
1.Is it better or what?
2.Do I need to make partitions before installing the Kernel?
3.Do I need to wipe anything before installing the Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think the best way is to do it a clean install and use clockwork latest
wipe sd card,create partition 512 mb (automatically creates ext4)
transfer rom file and franco kernel using usb mount
wipe data,cache,system, and then select mik rom and install
reboot and complete the setup for rom,boot into recovery again and flash franco kernel do wipe ur cache
reboot
done!
asserp said:
...But i really think that the best combination is just CM7 + libsqlite.so patch + franco's tweaks and none modifications for kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If so, you mind giving the URLs to Libsqulite patch and franco's tweaks. thanks.
Sure, you can get tweaks from here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=999064
and libsqllite from: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1000899
scroll down ull see Patched libsqlite.so for 2.3 by:mik_os
Kheepur said:
Thanks for the quick reply.
1.Is it better or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only if you benchmark your phone, for common use I do not feel any noticeable difference. I only flash franco's kernel in mik's CM7 out of curiousity not of necessity.
2.Do I need to make partitions before installing the Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
3.Do I need to wipe anything before installing the Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, just flash over. It will overwrite the old kernel.
As a short explanation:
no kernel have so sayed "special code" for froyo or gingerbread. We (the developers) have currently the 2.6.32 as base kernel because of missing drivers for a newer kernel version like 2.6.35.
the only difference between all .32er kernels are the patches - one kernel have more patches, another kernel have better patches, another have nothing of all - it works only as is.
thanks for explanation.
Thanks to all who responded.
Ok. New scenario. new problem.
I got mik_os v.6.3 + p500 tweak + libsqlite.os + DT apps2sd + CWM
The problem is I can't upgrade to mik_os v.6.5.
I already got the rom. I tried wiping everything using CWM, even the system. After installing and reboot, I got stuck in the first LG logo. Am I missing anything??
What is the correct way to upgrade and exact steps to take??
Thanks in. advance
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
i think you need to format your sd card because of app2sd and leave it without partition , and try to flash the rom. If successful then make partitions again and flash app2sd.
hey can i flash franco Kernel 2.6.35.13 in stable 6.5.5 cm7
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1148196
abhi29 said:
hey can i flash franco Kernel 2.6.35.13 in stable 6.5.5 cm7
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1148196
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope. only 6.6 is configured to use 2.6.35 kernels. if you flash it, you will run into problems (for example, when i flashed it, camera showed only a white screen and accelerometer didnt work)
hmmmmmm.....Right info....
so yeah i was wondering if i can flash francisco's tweaks on GB 6.5.4 CM 7 from mik_os with franco's kernel.... or it doesn't change anything..? is it possible? is it better?
Help! <3
There has been so many threads and posts on this.. Yes it will work and yes it performs better.
Next time please do a search:
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&...mus+one+franco's+kernel+with+cm7&start=0&sa=N
Feeshie said:
There has been so many threads and posts on this.. Yes it will work and yes it performs better.
Next time please do a search:
http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&...mus+one+franco's+kernel+with+cm7&start=0&sa=N
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm really sorry i'm new on this.. and i couldn't find it before so i'm sorry again and thanks for replying!
fernando1sg said:
so yeah i was wondering if i can flash francisco's tweaks on GB 6.5.4 CM 7 from mik_os with franco's kernel.... or it doesn't change anything..? is it possible? is it better?
Help! <3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean having CM7 + Fk18+ franco tweaks? If this is what you mean then no do not flash franco's tweaks. They have been integrated inside the kernel for some versions now (14 if not mistaken) and they conflict. Just install kernel and it will be complete
With GB you can use BFS Scheduler. it's better than CFS on smartphone
0x0v3rfl0w said:
With GB you can use BFS Scheduler. it's better than CFS on smartphone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i got the BFS version
mprou said:
Do you mean having CM7 + Fk18+ franco tweaks? If this is what you mean then no do not flash franco's tweaks. They have been integrated inside the kernel for some versions now (14 if not mistaken) and they conflict. Just install kernel and it will be complete
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn i did it already and i felt a decreasement and i ran a quadrant test and yeah it turned out a bit slower! :/ also i didnt do a nand backup so i guess i gotta flash all over again and i guess i'll use formatsystem.zip to delete franco's tweaks! Thanks for replying tho, i appreciate it
hey ,,
i was earlier using franco.kernel 22nov and i experienced touch lag so i switched to paoloM70 v5 kernel and now i want to know that which version of this kernel is best with best battery backup as i don't want vsync enabled
umangleekha said:
hey ,,
i was earlier using franco.kernel 22nov and i experienced touch lag so i switched to paoloM70 v5 kernel and now i want to know that which version of this kernel is best with best battery backup as i don't want vsync enabled
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
v6 then ...
terratrix said:
v6 then ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, this is the best choice for this kernel...
Guys this is discussion thread of ThunderVN Kernel by thachtunganh
Changelog is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ThunderVN Download link is
here
[10/4/2012]thunderVN v1
[18/4/2012]thunderVN v1- with KGSL from 3.0 kernel and battery improvement
[29/04/2012]thunderVN v1.02- CFS
[29/04/2012]thunderVN v1.02- BFS (Recommend to use)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source Code is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel Blog is
here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did he ask you to make this?!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
karthiknayak94 said:
Did he ask you to make this?!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,I asked to make this....
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
TakamineSubasa said:
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i found this kernel better than that one.
handryg555 said:
i found this kernel better than that one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better in what , in smoothness?? probably in 3d-games but im talking about gui
before u start criticising the kernel and pointing ur finger, just stick it up yo ...
its still in dev mode...
ccdreadcc said:
before u start criticising the kernel and pointing ur finger, just stick it up yo ...
its still in dev mode...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right..
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
_purple_ said:
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 18/04 version has battery fixes, but also included genlock and New GPU drivers which come from 3.0 kernel.... and BTW, i'm rebasing on tagb, so don't worry, i will fix all that bug
_purple_ said:
I was suggested to use ta-gb 1.1 + hotfix kernel (as bug-free and for good battery life) but I cannot find this specific version of the kernel. Could someone give me a link or upload it please so that I could give it a try?
Between the kernel I was suggested to use and the latest, which one do you think is better in terms of battery life and less bugs? And what is the difference between the two latest releases (10/4/2012 and 18/4/2012 <-What is this kernel)?
edit: This was the result after flashing the second one:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TakamineSubasa said:
Even though its a good kernel, still doesn't beats franco.kernel smoothness, in fact i've never been able to achieve franco level smoothness with any other kernel except franco itself...
With franco i get "iphone" smoothness level on contacts and settings menues, and many apps, statusbar etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think, t.a gb 1.1+hotfix is based on franco's touch drivers. I have used almost all kernels so far and I think at present Roq XIII with t.a touch drivers are the best in terms of smoothness, stability and battery. Use the conservative at 480/600. Even the t.a 1.1+hotfix is superbly smooth and has superb battery. But it has a bug that when after using gps the battery drains even if the gps is turned off. Franco kernel has multiple issues 1) Frequent reboots during calls 2) Cameranot working after first use...and many other issues.
Roq xIII with t.a touchfix is as smooth as the iphone. Only thing is you have to tweak some settings on the cynogen power menu, spareparts+ and blade buddy I also moved the default launcher (Go Launcher) to my /system/apps to have the smoothness I get now. Smoothnesss cannot come just by installing the kernel. You have to tweak settings...
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
_purple_ said:
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but no more now, go to the theard again and you will see the new kernel
I was away from XDA from 1 month....
So, I want to know can thunderVN 1.02 be used on latest hehappy's cm9 build??
Will everything be functional???
Thank YOu!
It's too soon for your second question to be answered. It's been a few hours since the kernel was released. If you give it a try there will be one more tester to give feedback.
I just flash the last kernel on hephappy's last build (youlookbeautiful) and i got stuck in lg logo
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA
@ TiioSam:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=25481429&postcount=749
_purple_ said:
pradipsoman could you please verify if the kernel that you uploaded here is the 1.1 you are suggesting? The filename is v1.2 but I have to ask because it could just be a typo. What is your experience on the current version of thunder-vn? Do you still think the older 1.1 version of thunder-vn is better than the current one and why? offtopic: One more think, is Roq xIII as good as described on stock 2.3 rom? Or is it one of those kernels made for custom roms?
@ thachtunganh So what happened to my device (stock 2.3)? Are these drivers meant to be used on ics based roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can now use Thundervn Latest Release from TA Have tested it and now it does not have the wifi bug (only bug that t.a 1.1+hotfix had). It is smooth as butter and has excellent battery. Lets experiment further...
I'm testing it too. I'm satisfied by the smoothness too but how did you make a conclusion that soon about the battery life and the lack of gps bug?
thachtunganh said:
Bugs:
Slow USB read/write speed! - This will anoy some people that usually transfer files.
What i need to do next?
Increase the read and write speed of USB Mass Storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On the latest 1.02 version is the above bug considered to be present? I get 7MB/s write and 15MB/s read speeds. If these are slow, what speed would be normal?
_purple_ said:
I'm testing it too. I'm satisfied by the smoothness too but how did you make a conclusion that soon about the battery life and the lack of gps bug?
On the latest 1.02 version is the above bug considered to be present? I get 7MB/s write and 15MB/s read speeds. If these are slow, what speed would be normal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's fixed, i can copy a file to my sdcard with 4.5MB/s .. if i forgot to delete it, sorry and thanks for reminding me!
Hello guys. Those of you, who have been monitoring ray's dev section, know, that there is such a kernel for GB, as "pure emerald' or "aire's" kernel. But its problem is that it's for GB So i decided to do this kernel for ICS. I'm from russia and 4pda, and on our forum we don't like many "svistoperdelkas", which means that we don't like to have many useless (and sometimes not stable) features.
So, you can understand now, why there are no many features in my kernel which you can find in sirkay's kernel, for example. The advantage of such a kernel is that there is no any trash in it, only main things.
Features:
Clean ramdisk
Removed Fota
ext2, ext3, ext4, vfat, ntfs support
USB OTG support
Init.d support
Linaro
DooMKernel recovery (it's the best, IMHO)
Added smartass2 governor (a very battery friendly one)
Swap, ZRam
2way call recording (uses CallRecoder by skvalex)
And now smth really new (for my kernel at least). Now YOU choose what OC to use. I've got 3 versions of this kernel.
1) 1.4 OC + uv (very battery friendly)
2) 1.4 OC no uv (for those ones, where uv causes random reboots) (not so battery friendly)
3) 1.6 OC + vdd. (not battery friendly at all, only for performance)
Download - link
One more thing. You can either believe it or not. But still. My HDD is dying. First 4GB of it are already covered with bad blocks. Also, the 10th GB is "bad". These bad blocks are "hardware". My linux is installed somewhere at 40th gb, but i think it won't take very long untill it's dead too. The first version of my kernel was downloaded for 260 times. Not so much as on 4pda (2000+ ), but still quite a lot. If every person who have downloaded it donated 1$ for me - i could buy a new HDD. So, if you are not indifferent to me and my HDD, please, donate to me thanks in advance
Wow!!! Finally a new kernel!
I hope it's battery friendly :laugh:
Aire kernel was my favourite GB kernel
Best regards
:good:Tnx,this is just what i needed....flashed&testing...
:good:
P.s.: I don't like "svistoperdelkas" too...
flashed, i'm trying it :good:
Finally new dev kernel.. Welcome dude! Can I use this kernel for MIUI?
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
frogerra said:
Finally new dev kernel.. Welcome dude! Can I use this kernel for MIUI?
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep.it works perfectly on every stock-based rom
support init.d?
I've been looking forward to this.
no, no init.d. but i'll to try add it in next version.
vdsirotkin said:
we don't like many "svistoperdelkas"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
'Gimmicks' or 'bells and whistles'.
upd: also add to theme string tag [ICS] at the beginning.
[KRNL][ICS] VDS kernel v1.0 (11/10)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
)
vdsirotkin said:
no, no init.d. but i'll to try add it in next version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wil wait for your next version.
can i use it with CM10 ?
konikpk said:
can i use it with CM10 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no. i'm not sure, but 99% that no
vdsirotkin said:
Hello guys. Those of you, who have been monitoring ray's dev section, know, that there is such a kernel for GB, as "pure emerald' or "aire's" kernel. But its problem is that it's for GB So i decided to do this kernel for ICS. I'm from russia and 4pda, and on our forum we don't like many "svistoperdelkas", which means that we don't like to have many useless (and sometimes not stable) features.
So, you can understand now, why there are no many features in my kernel which you can find in sirkay's kernel, for example. The advantage of such a kernel is that there is no any trash in it, only main things.
Features:
OC (aka overclock) up to 1.4 gHz
UV aka undervolt
DooMKernel recovery (it's the best, IMHO)
Added smartass2 governor (a very battery friendly one)
Swap, ZRam
2way call recording (uses CallRecoder by skvalex)
Thats all A superlight kernel, as you can see Hope, that some of you share our (4pda guys') ideals in kernel features. Good luck!
Download
BTW, if you want to support my kernel (i don't believe in that ), you can donate to me thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you define "svistoperdelkas" in kernel? debugging enabled in defconfig? what features my kernel have that yours dont?
sirkay said:
how do you define "svistoperdelkas" in kernel? debugging enabled in defconfig? what features my kernel have that yours dont?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow wow, i didn't want to hurt you
OC up to 1.6, many governors, I\O shedulers and everything like that
vdsirotkin said:
wow wow, i didn't want to hurt you
OC up to 1.6, many governors, I\O shedulers and everything like that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sirkay said:
how do you define "svistoperdelkas" in kernel? debugging enabled in defconfig? what features my kernel have that yours dont?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm,my friends,i think that you have two different approach in kernel compiling,vdsirotkin's one is good for battery,while sirkay's one is more"experimental" and good for performance,no-one is better than another:simply they are different..:beer::beer::beer:
Inviato da me!
vdsirotkin said:
wow wow, i didn't want to hurt you
OC up to 1.6, many governors, I\O shedulers and everything like that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats wrong with oc to 1.6?? my ray is stable at 1.6 so thats fine for me, nobody forces u to oc, same for governors and shedulers, not a good thing to point at another devs work and telling thats bad mine better
and arcatarc im not sure that the "simple" kernel is more battery frindle or more stable, will test during the weekand
funiewski said:
whats wrong with oc to 1.6?? my ray is stable at 1.6 so thats fine for me, nobody forces u to oc, same for governors and shedulers, not a good thing to point at another devs work and telling thats bad mine better
and arcatarc im not sure that the "simple" kernel is more battery frindle or more stable, will test during the weekand
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even if it's stable, not a very great speed advantage does not worth battery drain.
vdsirotkin said:
wow wow, i didn't want to hurt you
OC up to 1.6, many governors, I\O shedulers and everything like that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arcatarc said:
Calm,my friends,i think that you have two different approach in kernel compiling,vdsirotkin's one is good for battery,while sirkay's one is more"experimental" and good for performance,no-one is better than another:simply they are different..:beer::beer::beer:
Inviato da me!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not mad, just my curiosity to know how do you define "trash". if that so, then me too dont like "svistoperdelkas". i always made 2 version, one for users (with features they've requested) and one for me (with only smartassv2 and intellidemand gov, freq max 806mhz, dont UV, didnt use zram, disabled debugging, disabled unused modules).