Title basically says it. While running qudrant standard I'm getting horribly low numbers for the 2D and 3D graphics tests, but I still seem to be able to pull upwards of 2300. Can someone help me fix my graphics problem?
What is horribly low for you? Like less than 60 fps or what? Also, what kernel are you using?
Swyped from my LG-P509 using XDA App.
Im using fraco's kernel v18, and I'm getting 8-9 for the 2d test, and about 4-20 on the stairs test, and then about 45 on the planet test, and then 6-7 on the DNA test.
are you using the latest version of your rom?
Yes i actually just updated prior to this, about 2 hours before i ran quadrant. my phone seems to be working just fine, and I'm getting great numbers for everything else. I just wanted to beat my friends quadrant score of 3000 with this phone.
Sorry for double post, but I reflashed CM7, and I was wondering which CM7 i should flash and which franco kernel to maximize performance.
DeBiasoMan said:
Sorry for double post, but I reflashed CM7, and I was wondering which CM7 i should flash and which franco kernel to maximize performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check my signature
What is your neocore fps?
terratrix said:
What is your neocore fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mus be 70+ fps... Cuz i used it before... Then my phone bricked! T_T
Sent from LGE XDA phone wit Matt's v6.5.7(1.1)
My neocore score is 38.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Related
What are average quadrant starts for the vibrant? My phone is a freak and is scoring unusually high! I'm loving it though, blazing fast!
quadrants may vary depending on the rom, file system, kernel
Oh I see, I scored above 1750.. lol..
seem normal?
im running triger and tigers blood kernel, OC'd
Cmon guys, post up your stats!
GalaxySteve said:
Oh I see, I scored above 1750.. lol..
seem normal?
im running triger and tigers blood kernel, OC'd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its good ...i think mine is less ..testing now
mine is 1843
Quadrant doesn't matter....
Sdobron said:
Quadrant doesn't matter....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just a lil ...
bosina said:
just a lil ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct.
"quadrant doesn't matter"
The scores might be off, by alot, but it does show you something.
It shows the normal user if voodoo is activated or not...
If you think you have voodoo and are getting less than 1900 then you know something's wrong.
Quadrant DOES show something. Quadrant is NOT useless.
so many people are using it that it does matter.
bosina said:
just a lil ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After did a present tense should follow.
I run anywhere from 800 to 2100+ from stock to overclocked just because I can gotta love the devs
agreed, the only useful thing about quadrant is that you can confirm if voodoo is working.
i would go into why quadrant has been rendered *almost* useless, but smartbench does it better
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=226
Running GCR3 with Overstock 2.2.1 with Voodoo enabled. I have hit 2133 and average about 2080.
Wouldn't voodoo control tell you whether its active or not. It'll tell you you have an ext4.
Don't blame me, blame my keyboard's autocorrection algorithm.
This doesn't have anything to do with the vibrant but I saw a mt4g overclocked to 1.7 ghz. Got a quadrant score of 3300 or something like that!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App, if I helped hit the thanks button!
Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
2.I'm using franco.kernel 16.1 and get scores like 900~1000, with stagefirght, jit and Hardware Acceleration enabled why still I can't pass 1000
Wolfexon said:
Ok, just 2 questions
1.How can I save the quadrant scores in quadrant standard, it's so frustrating that whenever I have a rarely high score i can't save it to show my friends.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use a screenshot utility like ShootMe.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
If u want highscores use interactive data2sd and use any 2.3.4 rom
Thanks for the two answers
Helped me a lot
When i was in 2.2 i almost got 700~800 scores in Quadrant, now in 2.3.4, almost 1300. I think that´s normal because of the version.
I thing its wise if u using antutu...
Sent from my LG-P500
Yes, Antutu is more complete than Quadrant, and more detailed. You can get a comparative with things like Xoom, with Quadrant only with Nexus One 2.2 as the top.
sometimes my quadrant score 1350 with 2.2 froyo. sometimes 1000-1050 it is very interesting.
Could I get few people to post their scores? I wanna make sure im on par with a normal photon and I didn't **** something up LOL
Sent from my Unlocked Alien MoPho
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
slicedcheese said:
I have scored as high as 2,800 and as low as 2,000. Not sure what accounts for the fluctuation (The lower scores have been more recent).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After the first two runs, I can consistently get 2,750-2,800 on Quadrant Standard.
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Are you running a stock rooted/locked setup? Or are you running a custom rom/unlocked/overclocked setup? Cause I'm usually around 4500 to 4900.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My scores were just run as stock & unrooted. I reset my phone last weekend for a service call and Sprint is going to exchange it tomorrow for a new (and hopefully less buggy) Photon.
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
I got a 5400 without the loop trick with it well is 9000 high enough
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Lokifish Marz said:
Why are people continuing to use a benchmark that ****Cyanogen himself proved was flawed and easily faked?[/URL]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, never knew about that.
And my bootloader is unlocked, i am also on alien build #1.
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
xTMFxOffshore said:
Switch to the Skinny ROM with the OC kernel. That flies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking about it just going to wait a little longer till my phone feels a little less new.
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
3496 running skinny with the 1.3 kernel I have been loving this rom, having great battery life as well
Just curious but what are your Guy's charging times? Like from anything under 5 percent to 100 percent. I am asking just because drain times vary but charge times should not.
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I just got a 3 in linpack
Sent from my g1 using XDA App
lroy said:
Ill throw in a few. Running CM7
Quad - 3458(before i loaded CM7i was around 2500 if i remember correct)
Linpack Single Thread - 42.34
Linpack - Multiple Thread - 69.239
AnTuTu - 5149
Vellamo - 863
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Well you have one option for cm7, lol
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
DethMetalz69 said:
NICE. I just got CM7 and im getting WAY better scores.
And as far as kernels go, i havent flashed one yet because im afraid of it killing my battery, or breaking wifi. Can you give me a link to a OC kernel that doesnt break wifi, and isnt too heavy on battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
hjcg2001 said:
did you had to unlock to get cm7?? is better than stock? do you lose any functionality?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You loose all blur stuff. If you ran or have used cm7 before, you'll want it again and again. It's snappy and smooth. My stock blur would fc on me but my photon w cm7 has not fc once yet.
For charge times, I was at 27% (after 3 days run time) and I got to 95% in less then an hour and a half.
This week I may flash the beta kernel for cm7 and retest but depends on work schedule. Still trying to get a good calculation of cm7 and battery run time. So far amazing!
Little better after flashing jokers v3 kernel for CM7. loving CM! I think my phone can go faster then I can type with my ugly thumbs.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Cm7 with jokers kernel.
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Hello everyone, I currently have CM7 on my LG Optimus one which has been overclocked to 787mhz, the max available in the kernel that comes with CM7. I get about 800-900 points in quadrant and I would like to know how to make my phone faster. I see some get 1200 or more in quadrant and would like to know what rom's,kernel's, and tweaks they used.
Any help would be great. Thanks
davefootball123 said:
Hello everyone, I currently have CM7 on my LG Optimus one which has been overclocked to 787mhz, the max available in the kernel that comes with CM7. I get about 800-900 points in quadrant and I would like to know how to make my phone faster. I see some get 1200 or more in quadrant and would like to know what rom's,kernel's, and tweaks they used.
Any help would be great. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Quanrant v1.x
Oh are the scores different in 2.0? Also what kernel will let me overclock further and still work with CM7 nightlies for my optimus one?
EDIT: Ran quadrant 1.8 and got a score of 1288, not bad. Can I improve this further though?
;-)
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
davefootball123 said:
Oh are the scores different in 2.0? Also what kernel will let me overclock further and still work with CM7 nightlies for my optimus one?
EDIT: Ran quadrant 1.8 and got a score of 1288, not bad. Can I improve this further though?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ummm I'm not an expert on this but running old version simply increases your score because it's just an older version. In other words your performance is still the same.
Look at 3Dmark 06 vs 3Dmark 11...
Maybe a faster memory card...
Maybe with none apps installed... (ha)
But at the end of the day, it's just a benchmark. (as eeee616 said, use the old version 1.x)
More quadrant scores won't make your phone faster. Don't be concerned about it.
quadrant scores are juz for benchmarking....u need to think about speeding up only if u hav a laggy phone..miks port is pretty fast..so is oxygen rom for new baseband...try a class 4 or higher memory card....
Will franco v4 kernel work with CM7 nightlies rom?
davefootball123 said:
Will franco v4 kernel work with CM7 nightlies rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup im using CM 7 nightlies with franco v4 kernel n its working good....
I saw this epic rom in the Optimus one Forum
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1764170
The Benchmark score is so epic. I think IT has The Same specs like our ace so can somebody maybe Port this to our device.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
comments are not at all positive..
besides without source compiling performance boost is literally dreams..
troullis2004 said:
I just tried it and i have to say that i got as low as 1720 something with quadrant using 480-787 smartass v2 and as low as 1838 using antutu with same cpu settings...
Man, i think that somethings up with that picture! No way our device gets that score!
Also i get an FC when I click brightness setting! I can' t change it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything more to be said?
benchmark score doesnt mean almost nothing
i get 3k on my live with walkman on stock based rom with stock kernel
and it doesnt lag
better yet its buttery smooth
EDIT:
forgot to say that score is without sd card (i dont have 500mb free ]