ACE is a good phone. 800 mhz should able to record 1280x720 video. as iphone running same speed and same 5mp camera.
anyone through of it?
cheers
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
You are dreaming.
IPhone has a different processor. It'll run faster actually.
keijames said:
ACE is a good phone. 800 mhz should able to record 1280x720 video. as iphone running same speed and same 5mp camera.
anyone through of it?
cheers
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I remember correctly the iPod Touch 4th Generation has an 800Mhz processor , but it's am ARMv7 conpatible processor .
Sent from my Ultima Weapon© using XDA App
EmoBoiix3 said:
If I remember correctly the iPod Touch 4th Generation has an 800Mhz processor , but it's am ARMv7 conpatible processor .
Sent from my Ultima Weapon© using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gotto admit that the picture quality on my iPod Touch 4 was pretty poor though.
QNBT said:
I gotto admit that the picture quality on my iPod Touch 4 was pretty poor though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Cue the answer
Sent from my Ultima Weapon© using XDA App
how about HD video?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
keijames said:
how about HD video?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compare our phone to the Vivaz .
Sent from my Ultima Weapon© using XDA App
I had a Samsung Wave II (S8530) with a 1GHz processor, can't remember what processor it had though, but that Phone has the best Video capabilities I have ever seen. Wife took a video from the back of assembly hall and you could hear the principle talking to someone without the microphone over the noise of the pupils while you can also see his untied shoe laces. To bad that phone has a crappy OS...
I might be mistaking, but I read somewhere that Gingerbread (2.3.4 I think) increased the resolution of movies in Ace. Is that true? Obviously not to HD quality but higher than the current value?
Thats true: from 320x240 to 640x480.
that is DVD quality. still not good enough.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
keijames said:
that is DVD quality. still not good enough.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good enough for such a mid-range phone .
Sent from my Ultima Weapon© using XDA App
keijames said:
that is DVD quality. still not good enough.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you should sell your ace and spend a lot of money on a high end phone.
Now its like you buy a mid range car and complain about it not being able to drive as fast and comfortable as a porsche.
Cheers
catapult1234 said:
Then you should sell your ace and spend a lot of money on a high end phone.
Now its like you buy a mid range car and complain about it not being able to drive as fast and comfortable as a porsche.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why buy high end mobile when we can buy motorola defy overclocked at 1.2ghz and 720p hd recording with cyanogenmod and miui ports and defy also is water resistant, dust proof, and resolution is 480x854. screen size is 3.7inch. and it has got ambient light sensor. flash in browser is also supported coz of ARMv8 processor.
price of defy is almost same as ace
himanshugurbani said:
why buy high end mobile when we can buy motorola defy overclocked at 1.2ghz and 720p hd recording with cyanogenmod and miui ports and defy also is water resistant, dust proof, and resolution is 480x854. screen size is 3.7inch. and it has got ambient light sensor. flash in browser is also supported coz of ARMv8 processor.
price of defy is almost same as ace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then buy that one. If you wanted hd video, maybe you should have done research first.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
You guys know that there are high-end phones for a low price?
eg. the Xiaomi phone that runs MIUI, quadrant as high as S2(unmodded). But we all know quadrant isnt something you should rely on.
e.g.
same price range Sony Mini / Mini Pro mid range phone has HD 720p video.
http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/corporate/products/phoneportfolio/specification/xperia-mini
price lower then ACE.
I think it would be possible if we change the camera apk of SGA,
with a camera apk that has HD recording like that of SGS2,Defy,Xeperia mini pro ..etc
keijames said:
e.g.
same price range Sony Mini / Mini Pro mid range phone has HD 720p video.
http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/corporate/products/phoneportfolio/specification/xperia-mini
price lower then ACE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But Ace looks better
My desire z at 806MHz records 720p flawlessly, so i dont see why an ace cant.
Sent from my Desire Z
exctly ! just need someone to make a drivers that allow recording 720p.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Related
Hey guys, I am considering bailing on my fascinate for a play. If you would be so helpful as just to reply yes or no if you believe thee play would be a better phone. Thanks!
Edit: My sincere apologies for the wrong section, just noticed. Mods please move to general.
Sent from my brain on channel 64!
Yes
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Yes
10 char
It is sort of better for gaming, but only for its keyboard nothing more. I would get dual core phone if i where you.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yes
Regards Dousan...
hd2life said:
It is sort of better for gaming, but only for its keyboard nothing more. I would get dual core phone if i where you.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone i know with an atrix or optimus are not impressed lol
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
I Came from the i9000, the only thing better about that was the screen.
There is no lag like the Samsung it juts works in fact it all just works strictly speaking we dont need a custom rom on this as it's pretty good as stock (not that we arnt trying of course)
So if you love games buy it, if you like games buy it, if your not bothered about games dont buy it.
AndroHero said:
Everyone i know with an atrix or optimus are not impressed lol
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha ha thats funny my bro had an atrix for about 20 minutes till it had a meltdown coming out of the damn store!
Of course ! Go get it
If you won't miss the much better screen of the Fascinate, the Play is a very good choice. It has a very solid Interface without much fluff, is developer-friendly, has awesome gaming controls, solid (not great) cameras and good GPS. The screen however isn't all that great. It has good colors, but the maximum brightness is pretty crappy, it's not very visible in sunlight and the picture sometimes 'drags' a little. Nothing that would ruin the run, but it's noticeable.
hd2life said:
It is sort of better for gaming, but only for its keyboard nothing more. I would get dual core phone if i where you.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the included playstation emulator that is pretty quality
I would buy the sgs 2 if I were u
Sent from my R800i using XDA Premium App
I'd say yes too
ammarcool12 said:
I would buy the sgs 2 if I were u
Sent from my R800i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, the play is great for gaming but it is lacking in power compared to some of the latest phones.
My buddy got a free play and let me play with it 4 a night. If your a gamer, the controller is a serious selling point. On my desire hd, gaming is fun but touch screen sucks. On the play, I was loving gaming. Played ocarina of time. Set the controls to hardware and left the c buttons on screen. Ran smooth too. Same with final fantasy 9 on fpse. No lag at all. I get lag on my desire hd which is overall a better phone spec wise
Maybe it has a better video card? Or its optimized 4 gaming so specs mean nothing.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA App
Plus I overclock my desire hd to 1.5 ghzs. With 750ram. And the play runs better on stock 1ghz 512ram
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA App
LINKSLOVESANDROID said:
Plus I overclock my desire hd to 1.5 ghzs. With 750ram. And the play runs better on stock 1ghz 512ram
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have a desire HD too and agree GPU performance is better on the play, quallcomm said it developed more mature adreno drivers for the play, maybe once the play is hacked, a dev like snq could port the play drivers to the DHD
Adding in another yes, mine just came in the mail today. After spending the night with it I am absolutely pleased with my purchase. Finally, I can game properly on my phone. It's a really responsive phone, too. Gingerbread is snappy on this thing.
Yes!
Play is a really good phone, I love it`s controls and on stock firmware it really is good unlike with some other phones I have had where I just wanted to change to a custom rom because of them being boring or buggy.
Play may not have as powerful a processor as some other smart phones, but it`s gpu makes up for it and gives the power it needs for great gaming.
Sony do need to get their asses in gear for the Playstation releases though, right now their line up is crap and not getting much update.
kingvillain said:
Yes!
Play is a really good phone, I love it`s controls and on stock firmware it really is good unlike with some other phones I have had where I just wanted to change to a custom rom because of them being boring or buggy.
Play may not have as powerful a processor as some other smart phones, but it`s gpu makes up for it and gives the power it needs for great gaming.
Sony do need to get their asses in gear for the Playstation releases though, right now their line up is crap and not getting much update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apart from the Dual core tegra 2, the quallcomm scorpion is the most powerful CPU on the market, infact it's its GPU adreno 205 witch lacks in power
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
because moto blur takes up more processing power ALSO the the photon has a 1ghz dual core and teh e4gt has a 1.2 ghz dual core. same ram i believe... but honestly until internet speeds are crazy increaded and battery life is maximized idc they all run around the same speed imo.
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
clifton421 said:
I think the G2X uses a different cpu/gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
I think it's software Optimization.
Its almost the same spec,and maybe our photon dont use its full power to conserve battery? Like shut down one core or something?
another viewpoint its the drivers.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Motorola has qHD resolution, so the gpu has to push 25% more pixels.
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
Isn't g2x stock vanilla android? That makes a world of difference
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
I thought it used hummingbird processor
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MB855 using XDA App
The MoPho runs circles around the POS!
Sent from my MoPho using the XDA Premium app
Gh0zt718 said:
Why the g2x had SO MUCH better benchmark scores now before anyone says I'm *****ing know that I'm not I'm just asking why 2 phones with the same processors have such diff scores the photon NEVER goes over 60 fps in quadrant but the g2x gets like 100+ and out had 1080p video recording like wtf was motorola thinking sprints best motorola phone is average now a data now I'm just asking why cause that's really annoying but honestly this is just a question not *****ing again
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the things that throws of the result is the nonstandard resolution of the Photon. This odd screen size requires scaling be used to run most benchmarks full screen. On an unscaled Smartbench run the scores are much higher than scaled and are fairly close to the GSII NVidia.
Gh0zt718 said:
No the g2x uses the tegra 2 same thing
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are three different CPU's used in the GSII (NVidia, Samsung, Qualcomm). The benchmarks vary with the Qualcomm being the bottom of the list.
Is it possible to pay someone or switch the screen of the original galaxy s2 for a Hd one?
i dont think so.... it would effect the software and everthing..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Smacdallas said:
i dont think so.... it would effect the software and everthing..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention needing driver source to get the screen to play well with our chip set
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk
Darn! That is crap!
Starseed said:
Darn! That is crap!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really... this isn't like a monitor on a computer
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA App
It would be nice if it worked though. I'd like something better than a 320x240 in my x10 mini but I didn't expect it to be possible anyway.
Sent from my E10i using XDA App
It would be nice. Or i can find someone who does the job.
Why would you want a different screen than what is on the S2? I dont know of another mobile device that has a better looking screen than our, or one thats really even that is close to a sharp!!!
Idk. Just not Hd like the iphone. Still it is alright...
Starseed said:
Idk. Just not Hd like the iphone. Still it is alright...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put them side by side and you'll see that while the iPhone wins for resolution and clarity, the SGS2 far exceeds it with contrast and colors.
Tottaly agree... I don't see the point in replacing the screen anyway what do you need that high of a resolution for anyway?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA App
I just really wanted one. Still its ok.
jjesusfreak01 said:
Put them side by side and you'll see that while the iPhone wins for resolution and clarity, the SGS2 far exceeds it with contrast and colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The SGS 2 has better black levels. That's about it.
Sent from my SGH-I897
Should have waited for the nexus or went with LG's 720p res phone. Also i work with a lot of iphone fanboys and not one yet has said they like their screen over mine
Screen Adjuster app lets you change red green blue plus contrast and brightness. I use it and it works well.
I use LCD Resolution app. Tw launcher isn't compatible but launcher pro and go launcher works great!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA Premium App
Samsung phones are highly proprietary and don't respond well to changes. Even using a non OEM battery can cause problems in some cases. What don't you like about the display? I think its pretty nice.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777) using XDA Premium.
Do you use your Galaxy Player 5.0's camera? What app do you use, or you use stock. Post some pics
Just wondering the quality, cuz my quality on is bad-decent. Just wondering if I could make it any better.
I rarely use it but I use the stock app. Quality wise it's good no complaints here's a back yard photo
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
I have the 4.0, not the 5.0.. But I always use the camera on it.
I usually use Pro Capture rather than the stock camera though.
I think the quality is pretty decent actually. Better than I expected it to be.
Kinda wish I had a flash like the 5.0, but whatever. lol
The quality is better than a family members 7-8 MP Kodak digicam, for sure. lol
Here's a recent shot from a hike~ (resized for forum)
2 moon shots from my GP 4.0~
and one from the Kodak digicam~
I think The Galaxy Player wins. lol
:good:
Cool moon pics!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Holy cow, how do you get such big pictures of the moon without optical zoom? No optical zoom is the reason my galaxy player (or any other smart device) will ever replace my camera.
Sent using Tapatalk
atcq28 said:
Cool moon pics!
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks.
mirror is dirty as heck. lol
---------- Post added at 02:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:59 AM ----------
iJimaniac said:
Holy cow, how do you get such big pictures of the moon without optical zoom? No optical zoom is the reason my galaxy player (or any other smart device) will ever replace my camera.
Sent using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just held my galaxy players cam lens up to one of my telescopes eyepieces. lol
that was a 5 inch- Newtonian scope I think.
This was taken with my 5.0, no edit at all. You just have to know how to use the camera to get good quality pics. I have more pics like this one
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda premium
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda premium
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda premium
Here is a demo of flash and macro together.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
I uce isc camera + because it has option for 8mbt data for video which is much better then on stock camera.
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
I don't ever use the camera. I'm on ICS. Troll
Sent from my YP-G70 using xda app-developers app
Even when I was on Gingerbread, I never used the camera. It is inadequate and insufficient to get what I want out of a photograph. There is no "real" zoom on the lens and the megapixel count on the device is never going to produce any pictures of print quality.
Thus, for my photography needs, I go to a Nikon D7000 DSLR. In contrast, however, my wife uses Canon's Powershot Series camera, which is a very powerful, much cheaper alternative to a DSLR.
Higgs_Boson said:
Even when I was on Gingerbread, I never used the camera. It is inadequate and insufficient to get what I want out of a photograph. There is no "real" zoom on the lens and the megapixel count on the device is never going to produce any pictures of print quality.
Thus, for my photography needs, I go to a Nikon D7000 DSLR. In contrast, however, my wife uses Canon's Powershot Series camera, which is a very powerful, much cheaper alternative to a DSLR.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont agree,i printed more then 100 pictures and they are very good(off coure not pro but dslr you care only in some situation and phone or player is always with you) ,there is no real zoom on any smartphone and there will not be in near future.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
DZonikg said:
I dont agree,i printed more then 100 pictures and they are very good(off coure not pro but dslr you care only in some situation and phone or player is always with you) ,there is no real zoom on any smartphone and there will not be in near future.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you've never heard of the Samsung Galaxy Camera......
raishiro said:
Obviously you've never heard of the Samsung Galaxy Camera......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard but that is a camera with android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
I love the camera on my player but I'm willing to not use it for the small time being because CM10 is coming out with a 3.xx kernel so the Camera will be working in no time.
I'm a bit reluctant to update to one of the ICS roms because I use the camera so often. Sure, it doesn't compare to a dedicated device but it's more than adequate image quality for sharing and/or even printing if you play around enough with the settings. Night shots are obviously pretty bad but can't say I expected much more from a tablet's camera.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-3go4TqxLIAMFVQNUhPTWFOWEE
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-3go4TqxLIASXZVOHZxRmNtRnc
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-3go4TqxLIASUZSYzNxdnZqdDg
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-3go4TqxLIAaEZTTG1panBJbEk
Some mushrooms, taken with my 4.0
I forgot to put Macro on, but still came out pretty decent.
Anyone who says this isn't "good enough" for the quick snapping of pics, is :silly: lol
Obviously one wouldn't use these cameras for professional photography, but to say it's "not even good enough to use" is ridiculous.
Hi i want to buy a new phone, and not sure if i have to go for SII or Xperia S. The main thing i will use the phone for is mobile gaming.
One of these would be better.
(In other words, these threads are ridiculous)
vladdracula said:
Hi i want to buy a new phone, and not sure if i have to go for SII or Xperia S. The main thing i will use the phone for is mobile gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S2 would be better ..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Should I buy a bmw x5 or range rover?.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Definitely the Beamer
theunderling said:
Should I buy a bmw x5 or range rover?.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theunderling said:
Should I buy a bmw x5 or range rover?.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think the question is dumb.. i'm asking which phone is better for mobile gaming because i dont' know
Love people on here .. they can't just answer questions.
Go for the SGS2, you won't regret it.
check these out you then make your decision
http://geekaphone.com/compare/Sony-Xperia-S-vs-Samsung-Galaxy-S-II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N4zaBS--a8
Rackers said:
Love people on here .. they can't just answer questions.
Go for the SGS2, you won't regret it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed. all want to play the "policemen" of the forum that find 75% of the questions too dumb to be answered.
@op definitely the s2... No wonder if it reached over 30 million users.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
riro1612 said:
Indeed. all want to play the "policemen" of the forum that find 75% of the questions too dumb to be answered.
@op definitely the s2... No wonder if it reached over 30 million users.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well you all say S2 but why? is it real better for gaming? Because it's 1.2 GHz and SXS is at 1.5 GHz and i read that Adrenno 220 GPU is twice faster than Mali-400. But thats only what i read, that's why i'm asking.
The answer is simple... Because it's Samsung galaxy s2^^
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
riro1612 said:
The answer is simple... Because it's Samsung galaxy s2^^
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly.
Sent from my potato.
vladdracula said:
well you all say S2 but why? is it real better for gaming? Because it's 1.2 GHz and SXS is at 1.5 GHz and i read that Adrenno 220 GPU is twice faster than Mali-400. But thats only what i read, that's why i'm asking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adreno 220 is nowhere near the Mali-400MP.
I have a Galaxy S2 and my brother is using a HTC One S(Asia version, same chipset as SXS)
I have played Asphalt 7, The Dark Knight Rises, NFS Most wanted and many other High graphics Games.
They don't lag even a bit on SGS2 but sometyms they do lag a bit(lyk a stutter) on bro's One S, even though he is using Custom ROm on it.
AND
you can overclock S2 upto 1.6Ghz if you want and you get a processor that can handle it(every processor is different)
And lookout that you dont buy the I9100G model. It's chipset is much slower than original I9100 :highfive:
Gud luck :good: