Related
Hey guys, i hv rooted my phone n I want to flash a lag fix kernel on stock rom 2.2.2.. Which one sould I go for,
mik_os 1.1 / mik_os 1.2 / LOL lag fix kernel / any other?
Plz suggest the best one..
neither ,,,theres a der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1 optimised by sippolo everybody is using that one
How is it better than the others??
sarfaraz1989 said:
neither ,,,theres a der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1 optimised by sippolo everybody is using that one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can these kernels be installed with stock rom?
my phone says:
android version: 2.2
kernel version: 2.6.32.9
software version: v10c - oct-19-2010
i rooted the phone without hitches using z4root. i just want a better kernel as not brave enough for the custom ROMs.
thanks
ash
sarfaraz1989 said:
neither ,,,theres a der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1 optimised by sippolo everybody is using that one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thnx sarfaraz..
I flashed der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1.It made my gaming experience much better..I flashed mik_os too but sippolo's one was better..
where can i find der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1 optimised by sippolo?
guys if u are into gaming ...Courtesy a dev franscisco.franco...He have a super optimised rom best for gaming i just installed it its amazing !!!! And the best part it has all optimizations in it u dont have to worry abt a thing..Just follow the instructions and set it up...Its got everything from best kernel to awesome hacks and tweaks i m loving it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1049518
7s10u said:
where can i find der_caveman fix signed-kernelv1.1 optimised by sippolo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=11270721&postcount=237
sarfaraz1989 said:
guys if u are into gaming ...Courtesy a dev franscisco.franco...He have a super optimised rom best for gaming i just installed it its amazing !!!! And the best part it has all optimizations in it u dont have to worry abt a thing..Just follow the instructions and set it up...Its got everything from best kernel to awesome hacks and tweaks i m loving it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1049518
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks,but do you know if i can find only the kernel to flash or i must flash the rom because im in lol 1.4.2 rom with dookmat kernel flashed over and works great
well u can always flash the kernel (caveman's) with the link i posted above
Does data of phone wipes after flashing with custom kernel?
I've all things done made a custom recovery even. With 1.2 version even.anything else I need to do?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
thanks!!!!!
is there any kernel which helps with battery life. I don't necessarily want a custom rom. any kernel which helps with battery life I would be interested. my rooted stock v.10c is running out of juice rather quickly and I am not yet using heavily. I am not too much into gaming or multimedia. 3g has to be on; as in my area 2g signal is worse than 3g.... go figure.
thanks
ash
i recommend u flash der_caveman's kernel and install and setup juice defender from market..I have done the same..Plus a tweaks like low brightness and powersave governor when screen is off(SetCPU) help
Hi all can i try flashing this kernel on my stock rom...This one seems nice..
[ROM] devoid.franco (franco.Kernel.v6: BFQ,BFS,smartass,lagfix,3D drivers +)
I plan on getting a custom rom soon and wonder which one you guys would have in mind....something that is stable and nice features etc.
Sent from my LG-P509 using XDA App
my first custom rom was LOL 1.4.2 based on Froyo 2.2.2. Now i have devoid-froyo-final with franco kernel v17 and this is awesome and i have great battery life
my first custom rom is miks cm7 this is awesome & bugless so go for miks cm7 i am using it with franco kernel v17+zram
rchile said:
my first custom rom is miks cm7 this is awesome & bugless so go for miks cm7 i am using it with franco kernel v17+zram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say that miks cm7 is bugless, in fact he lists the known bugs in the first post. That being said, if these bugs don't bother/affect you then by all means go with a cm7 rom (miks or devoid).
Personally, I prefer stability and run devoid froyo final.
Thanks for the answers..and which one do you thing I should use for my phone....a good one..phone version froyo 2.2
Sent from my LG-P509 using XDA App
"Opinions are like asshole, everybody's got one." (cit Clint Eastwood)
Every rom has its peculiarities...You can choose the devoid if you want a "void" rom with just the essential stuff, you can choose Jince for its apps or LOL or openOptimus... It's your choose and if I could give you a suggestion, don't think too much about it, try one of them and if you don't like it, just try another one
BTW: why have you opened three threads with the same question?
Hi gang,
Is there any stable bug free oc kernel available for our galaxy ace running on cm7.1?
I tried blackhawk kernel last night. However had issues with superuser, wifi and ext4 partitions.
Please help with links if u know of any such kernel.
Many thanks in advance.
-Nisha
Try cm7.1 OC kernel from ketut...
nishantmnit said:
Hi gang,
Is there any stable bug free oc kernel available for our galaxy ace running on cm7.1?
I tried blackhawk kernel last night. However had issues with superuser, wifi and ext4 partitions.
Please help with links if u know of any such kernel.
Many thanks in advance.
-Nisha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi @Nisha...
I have used both of @ketuts OC kernels without issue... "Blackhawk" kernel is reported to be the most stable, however I find that I get the same stable environment using the original OC kernel & a higher clock speed (check my sig for details).
Here is the link for the Original OC Kernel (@[email protected]) : http://www.mediafire.com/?yb4g7mzgysc36bw
Flash this using CWM5 preferably & vital if you are running CM7.2 builds or you may encounter issues after flashing...
The changes in the new "Blackhawk" kernel are quite extensive. They involve a complete Backport of the GPU driver to a better performing driver, Framework modifications & a complete re-write of the kernel source code... The down side of this new kernel is that @ketut has now limited the OC frequencies to a max of 902mhz... This is one of the reasons why I am still using the original kernel over the new one... I have got 921mhz stable which is higher than the new kernel will allow, so using the new kernel would be counter productive from my perspective...
Give this kernel a run & see how you go...
FYI : Make sure that you update CWM to v5. Contrary to a few reports, this CWM is stable... I have used it for the last 3 months, all options & functions work correctly & I have had absolutely "No" issues... It is also needed to correctly flash the new roms (7.2 etc.)
Stay Breezy n Be Lucky...
Pe"ACE"...
Thanks reaper, can u plz help me with two more things
1) link to stable blackhawk kernel. I am currently using zimage kernel. And no offence to developer but it sucks sometimes. Cant really see any cpu freq being used between min and max cpu freq.
2)link to cwm5.
Many thanks in advance dear.
-Nisha
ReaperXL2 said:
Hi @Nisha...
I have used both of @ketuts OC kernels without issue... "Blackhawk" kernel is reported to be the most stable, however I find that I get the same stable environment using the original OC kernel & a higher clock speed (check my sig for details).
Here is the link for the Original OC Kernel (@[email protected]) : http://www.mediafire.com/?yb4g7mzgysc36bw
Flash this using CWM5 preferably & vital if you are running CM7.2 builds or you may encounter issues after flashing...
The changes in the new "Blackhawk" kernel are quite extensive. They involve a complete Backport of the GPU driver to a better performing driver, Framework modifications & a complete re-write of the kernel source code... The down side of this new kernel is that @ketut has now limited the OC frequencies to a max of 902mhz... This is one of the reasons why I am still using the original kernel over the new one... I have got 921mhz stable which is higher than the new kernel will allow, so using the new kernel would be counter productive from my perspective...
Give this kernel a run & see how you go...
FYI : Make sure that you update CWM to v5. Contrary to a few reports, this CWM is stable... I have used it for the last 3 months, all options & functions work correctly & I have had absolutely "No" issues... It is also needed to correctly flash the new roms (7.2 etc.)
Stay Breezy n Be Lucky...
Pe"ACE"...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wifi is not working after flashing this.please advise reaper.
-Nisha
Got myself a live walkman. what's the best rom and kernel for this phone?
Thanks,
John
Stock
Sent from my WT19i using Tapatalk
I personally use hybrom v15 with x kernel. Currently the most stable ROM according to me.
MIUI has nice interface, but has still quite a lot of bugs and not everything works. Also CyanogenMod.
Sent from my WT19i using xda premium
Someguyfromhell said:
I personally use hybrom v15 with x kernel. Currently the most stable ROM according to me.
MIUI has nice interface, but has still quite a lot of bugs and not everything works. Also CyanogenMod.
Sent from my WT19i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw before that you were using Rage Kernel, is X Kernel better?
I am currently using Rage Kernel.
Is X Kernel much more battery efficient and better performance compared to Rage Kernel?
I have used rage kernel, x kernel, krsh kernel and bbooff kernel on my live with walkman. x kernel is the best, seems to me.
I also want ot know the best rom for live.
sorry for my english.
I,ve using Hybrom V15 with Rage kernel.
Sometime it abit laggy when your phone on a high temperature. (I've OC to 1.2 Ghz :\)
I think I should try x kernel when I'm less lazy.
PS. If you want a stable ROM. I prefer stock over Hybrom.
I already used hybrom, xrom and miuiv4 and the best from depends on your needs and likes if you want a stock from feeling go for hybrom very stable , xrom is pretty but has some bugs and miui is still beta but with a really nice interface rc0 kernel is giving me and average battery life. Never really tried cm7 or cm9 cause there is no stereo speakers and about kernels for me the rage kernel was the best.
Take into account that everyone has different experiences with roms and so, so the more stable is always stock, if no rom convince you just stick with with stock and try a custom kernel with it.
thank u guys. im sticking with stock until a stable rom comes along.
I use hybrom + x kernel
I am currently using Hybroman V15, used boof kernel then changed it to rage kernel.
Saw here in xda that x kernel seems to be the best.
Installed x kernel and tried to flash the zram but caused bootloops, never gets past bootanimation.
Had to reflash X kernel then install Hybroman again, so far so good...
Hybrom is currently stable ROM.
I haven't noticed big difference between X kernel and Rage kernel at the moment.
Haven't tested battery life difference.
Sent from my WT19i using xda premium
Hybrom is great but when i tried MIUI beta, is the best for music lover..
Hybrom stable, fast, useable..
MIUI true clear bass, stable when i used normally, fast with antutu cpu master..
Sent from my WT19i using xda premium
This Thread Rocks, Thanks to TS, Your Comments are really helpful to those who want to try custom roms and kernel,
Im planning to have mine Hybroman 16 + X Kernel Combo...
X Kernel Is the Best among the Feedbacks so Far... Please add more feedbacks.. thanks...
can anybody point us to x kernel. Curently using rage.not satisfied in bat. Life performance. But want to try x kernel
Hybroman.... this favorite rom, simple, smooth and minimalis.
bhovoi said:
can anybody point us to x kernel. Curently using rage.not satisfied in bat. Life performance. But want to try x kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go... X Kernel
In my opinion, Stock kernel and Stock ROM obviously you must root to get some extra features
Svartehjerte said:
In my opinion, Stock kernel and Stock ROM obviously you must root to get some extra features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Staying on stock rom and kernel is fine but if you want to extract a few more juice out of your phone and set things up a few notch higher; installing customized item is the answer. Improved battery life, bravia display, OC feature, new UI, etc. In the end all falls on the user preference as they say.
I too recommend that stock ROM is the best and almost bug free.
XKernal - Hybrom
hsrbnr said:
I too recommend that stock ROM is the best and almost bug free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think if u wanna try something more try X Kernal n Hybrom.. I have tried many ROM even the ICS ones this combination gives me hell of a good battery life... n I am not saying that this ROM is 100% stable sometimes gives away but okey
Hi! I'm new to the forums, and I was just wondering, is there an over clocking method made for this ROM, and are there any fully stable versions of it? I couldn't post in the topic itself as I am a new user and I spent quite a while looking through the posts hoping to look for an answer. If somebody knows of any of these two, please help! (I'm speaking for the latest CyanogenMod, the one with Jelly Bean 4.2)
No, no stable version of cm yet. There is release candidates but imo cm is still not stable for daily use. It's up to you to test it and see if it works for you as daily driver. It didn't for me.
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Oh I see. And what about any overclocking method, such as a kernel that may give me access to overclock?
And are all custom kernels supported by the same version (such as all custom kernels made for 4.2.2 will work with 4.2.2?)
For OC check out JBX-Kernel
Sent from my MZ601 using XDA Premium HD app
Do you mind linking me to this, as I have no idea where to find it sorry I'm quite the newcomer to this stuff. And also it's compatible with XT912 with CyanogenMod 10.1 right? (Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
I'd like to know how to oc my xt912 also... tried the kernel makes it unbearable slow with FC's and constant lag... tried out on buttered... avatar... liquid smooth...
Yeah same here. The fixes say to dlete any other CPU tweakers in the ROM, which is found in the Performance part of the CyanogenMod. Does anybody have any idea on how to delete/disable this part?
Markos96 said:
Do you mind linking me to this, as I have no idea where to find it sorry I'm quite the newcomer to this stuff. And also it's compatible with XT912 with CyanogenMod 10.1 right? (Jelly Bean 4.2.2)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is jbx kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2223517
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
romdroid. said:
Here is jbx kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2223517
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay I installed but in oder for it to work properly I have to disable the CPU controller built into CyanogenMod. Do you have any ides how to do that?
Markos96 said:
Okay I installed but in oder for it to work properly I have to disable the CPU controller built into CyanogenMod. Do you have any ides how to do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u have put any tweaks just disable them in CM, that is all. for example if u have set any governor or scheduler on boot, just disable them
May I just verify... my steps...
Go into ss3.11...
-In ROM slot 1 I wipe system,fr, and wipe caches.
-delete ROM slot 1, recreate ROM 1
-wipe everything again
-flash buttered AOKP... wipe... gapps... wipe... kernel..
- reboot...
Is that correct..
In the event that it is, doing so make the device is not really functional at all... compared to stock and to AOKP with out the kernel... I thank you kindly for any input
Well its a hit and miss, sometimes the rom doesn't not work very well with the kernel and vice versa. You may check the jbx kernel thread and see what people think about it and get some input from there because I am not using jbx atm
Sent from my XT910 using xda premium
Has anybody actually used Jbx Kernel on CyanogenMod and found that it worked well?
Can somebody explain to me the difference between raising your MPU OC (Live OC) and simply raising the CPU frequency? And which is better in which circumstances? (Like battery vs. performance)?