Related
Why Cronos Froyo is out of this forum?
It is the most stable and solid rom I tried on my Hero and I currently use this.
See the link below for more informations:
Linking to banned user's site is not permitted, per egzthunder1 and stericson's explanation posts
Yes its good, but Feeyo was banned from XDA-Developers.
Azure465 said:
Yes its good, but Feeyo was banned from XDA-Developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh! Naughty boy!
Too bad! The rom is very good. But rules are rules!
Thanks for your reply.
cestovuoro said:
Oh! Naughty boy!
Too bad! The rom is very good. But rules are rules!
Thanks for your reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pff you can discuss that ban...
Hey... I was wondering why he got banned, I was hanging round off topic when he got banned, and only when I came back I realised
i've to say, the best 2.1 rom came from feeyo, solid, fast and clean
still have to try 2.2 though...anyway, it's not much an effort to go on his own forum, it's easy to find on google
MacaronyMax said:
Hey... I was wondering why he got banned, I was hanging round off topic when he got banned, and only when I came back I realised
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a loooooooooooooooooooooooong loooooooooooooooooooooooong story That would take me like an hour to fully explain...
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
erasmux said:
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah Okay
Thanks
The source in question was the 32 kernel if i recall correctly. As far as i know, feeyo does not even have his original source on that anymore, and feeyo has been making his other source available to anyone who asks.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
erasmux said:
If I am not mistaken the short version is something like:
If and when Feeyo makes his kernel sources public he can come back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As herandroid said he has made his sources public but he cannot come back since he made some accounts after he was banned I think.
C0mpu13rFr34k said:
As herandroid said he has made his sources public but he cannot come back since he made some accounts after he was banned I think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where ?
erasmux said:
Where ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have minimal understanding of what you devs needs for sources but here? I think the kernel source is up to date but the name hasn't been changed but I'm not sure (it's the CK29- one). Is this correct?
C0mpu13rFr34k said:
I have minimal understanding of what you devs needs for sources but here? I think the kernel source is up to date but the name hasn't been changed but I'm not sure (it's the CK29- one). Is this correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What we "devs" call sources is: a group of files which when downloaded to a properly configured linux system, it is possible to build them and, get this, even run them on an actual hero device!
For example: https://github.com/erasmux/hero-2.6.29-flykernel
On my FlyKernel post you can find detailed instruction on how to build it, and if you have a linux system and are interested, you should be able to build my kernel with no problems.
EDIT: damn, again reading too fast. The CK29- one, does look like kernel sources, and I am sorry but don't have time now to download them and try and compile them. But did Feeyo really not update his kernel since august?
EDIT2: From the Cronos 1.6.0 release notes:
Release notes:
21 Nov 2010 | Cronos Froyo 1.6.0:
...
* New Kernel tweaks.
...
Where are these tweaks?
erasmux said:
What we "devs" call sources is: a group of files which when downloaded to a properly configured linux system, it is possible to build them and, get this, even run them on an actual hero device!
For example: https://github.com/erasmux/hero-2.6.29-flykernel
On my FlyKernel post you can find detailed instruction on how to build it, and if you have a linux system and are interested, you should be able to build my kernel with no problems.
On Feeyo's github, the only thing which seems like its sources for a kernel is this one:
https://github.com/Feeyo/cm-kernel-32A-Magic
These are obviously sources for a kernel for the Magic device and not the hero....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay then I guess I'll ask him...
Please see my edits above. I tend to read posts way to fast, I was sure I checked all the repositories on Feeyos github before posting my original one, but after I noticed you said its "CK29-", I rechecked it.....
erasmux said:
Release notes:
21 Nov 2010 | Cronos Froyo 1.6.0:
...
* New Kernel tweaks.
...
Where are these tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those tweaks you can find in 30tweaks under init.d in one of his kernel flashable zip.
Yes the kernel has been updated and it has been updated A LOT. I'm guessing Feeyo probably hasn't bothered updating his kernel but I'll ask him about it
EDIT: He has been trying out some very experimental stuff like compiling with a new toolchain and he is also very busy ATM. I think he said he would compile a new kernel with the old toolchain since the new one wasn't that good so maybe he is waiting till he get a proper kernel to release. That could also be it.
EDIT2: He just told me it was not the toolchain but a Linux kernel patch
I am sorry, but I don't have time for these games. Feeyo, does not wish to share his kernel sources. It his right, not his legal right, but still his decision.
Personally, the events that caused his banning do not sit well with me and I think it would have been better if they had never happened.
That said, it does not change the fact, Feeyo, for reasons only he knows, does not share his work with others, quite the opposite.
I will not waste any more of my time on supposed sources for his kernels, which, at best, are old sources which he really used at the time.
Okay whatever I don't understand this... I'm going to link this thread to Feeyo though...
I would love to see such talented developers such as feeyo and erasmux working together. Yeah i know, feeyo has to publish his sources, your are all right. I hope Cfreak can get him doing this.
The dev. at the hero section is getting really quiet.
I think the point is the villian team. They are making really good ROMs but when Feeyo came to XDA he delivered a very nice ROM. Noobody was very nice to him only said "play by rules, give me your sources". I think you get him in a very wrong way. He is a nice guy and very friendly over Cronos Forum, doing a great job and very intersting in new things. It would be a pleaure to welcome Feeyo back on board here but i think you all scared him.
Sorry for my bad english.
Hi all,
say that I'd like to try a CM7 custom compilation (e.g., removes half of packages, ...) for the sake of learning, what steps do you suggest to get into?
Compiling a full debuggable ROM and test it in the Android emulator?
Could I test It along with SE kernel (e.g., with the latest)?
In the emulator should i to install the SE related packages in order to set up the Xperia HW emulation?
Cheers!
There's a package of scripts named kitchen, made of a member here that let you customize a rom. There is even a root method that we were talking about the other day.
https://github.com/dsixda/Android-Kitchen
Hi kissmyarch,
i meant bulid It from the sources, not through the kitchen way ;-)
Oook sorry then.
LoL take a rom add ur theme, choose ur fav apps! Choose ur modules! And ur done! Custom rom is ready!
You know, I don't think people (including me) want to make a "repack" of an existing ROM, but build their own from sources instead, galvic
LoL nevermind then! This is what happening lately on mini pro forums, I just revealed how its being done!
Ravencz said:
You know, I don't think people (including me) want to make a "repack" of an existing ROM, but build their own from sources instead, galvic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Ravencz, building from sources is more funny than cooking... the fact is that you find a tutorial on cooking in the forum (and it's simplistic as hell) and no an hint on how to port your own CyanogenMod on your mini pro... what a pity...
Hoping someone on the devs' side will read this post ;-D... Cheers!
First of all cyanogenmod is already a cooked rom! If u want to port cyanogenmod u've to open it and then make it compatible for mini pro and repack it!
But you dont want that so rename the thread how to create custom gingerbread rom!
then use Sources from AOSP rom! Then repack 'em! Thats how its done, kitchen just provides an enviorenment for this!
galvic said:
First of all cyanogenmod is already a cooked rom! If u want to port cyanogenmod u've to open it and then make it compatible for mini pro and repack it!
But you dont want that so rename the thread how to create custom gingerbread rom!
then use Sources from AOSP rom! Then repack 'em! Thats how its done, kitchen just provides an enviorenment for this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, but that's not completely true. CyanogenMod has it's sources as well. Sure, you can download a clean build from their website, but you can also build CM on your own.
@galvic: CM doesn't seem a cooked ROM to me, since they provide the repository from which you could clone the sources. CM seems more a fork (with enrichments/improvements) of AOSP and cooking a CM isn't the same of building its source.
So the thread is correct, because if i fetch and edit the Gingerbread branch of CM source, actually i've built a custom CM7.
Instead of linking those megabytes of ROMs, shouldn't be better working on CM's branch and attach the related patches that brought to a custom CM ROMs, as patches for kernel modules and so on? Benefits of patches are small downloads size, learning what people do in making your beloved ROM, ... On the other side you've to set up a developer's environment, that is a bit expensive (Gingerbread sources are around 7 Gigabytes, if i'm not wrong).
I don't know if Gingerbread is the best choice with the unchangeable kernel that SE stuck on our smartphone, but say Gingerbread or Froyo or whatever the fix you've to make on a CM are (logically) the same until someone will make an hackish strike and take down that damned bootloader.
See you!
Ravencz said:
I'm sorry, but that's not completely true. CyanogenMod has it's sources as well. Sure, you can download a clean build from their website, but you can also build CM on your own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry but CM is also bult on sources of AOSP
galvic said:
Sorry but CM is also bult on sources of AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it is, but it's modified
Ravencz said:
Of course it is, but it's modified
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we should also modify them exclusively for mini pro, then it'll be called a perfect ROM?
thats what free-xperia project did, use miniCM resources!
galvic said:
So we should also modify them exclusively for mini pro, then it'll be called a perfect ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, compiling gives you control over things such as source code, compiling options/flags for optimization (say that our mini pros have ARMv6 processor, why having a ROM built for generic ARM architecture? It doesn't make any sense... that's the source-oriented GNU/Linux distro way as Gentoo: compiling kernel and all application for your machine in order to have best performances and responses), possibility of adding removing code (e.g. libraries, system applications) and so on.
Cooking let's you modify something pre-made and doesn't give you *full* control on it ;-)
If we've to take over the world, we've to do it in the proper way! :-D
Cheers
Edit: Now CM7 is stable, can we plz get custom kernels
Old:
Kernel Devs refrain from making custom kernels for CM7 because the CM team asked them not to, in the alpha stage of the development.
Today i asked Atinm if he could give the green light to the Devs, he replied:
atinm said:
Actually, we don't care if people run other kernels. We just say that we will not debug other people's kernels - so if you have bugs, you go to the kernel developer's threads. Same as on the other Galaxy phones. And there is more chance of your phone being unstable with each nightly when you are on a different kernel and we change the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to all kernel Devs, if possible plz make custom kernels for CM7
Many thnx
ragiut1 said:
Kernel Devs refrain from making custom kernels for CM7 because the CM team asked them not to, in the alpha stage of the development.
Today i asked Atinm if he could give the green light to the Devs, he replied:
to all kernel Devs, if possible plz make custom kernels for CM7
Many thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have maked one ...
I just saw it
Thnx
not quite the place to post this but party on
I had scaling issues with the stock kernel so i'm looking forward to this.
Great to see this.
I have 2questions.
1. Once we have these kernels will we be be able to flash files to enable Samsung stuff like Samsung dive, camera etc
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
aalupatti said:
Great to see this.
I have 2questions.
1. Once we have these kernels will we be be able to flash files to enable Samsung stuff like Samsung dive, camera etc
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. No.
2. No. All coding at the moment. Atnim is waiting for the att gs2 source code at the moment.
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Now CM7 is stable, can we plz get custom kernels
aalupatti said:
Great to see this.
2. Will new kernels be able to incorporate files from stock rom to fix the Bluetooth issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 7.1 Stable has working bluetooth, and it wasn't a kernel issue, it was a driver source problem, Cyanogen either cracked it ahead of everyone else, or, got access to the missing source code, either way, winning like Charlie Sheen.
I have added my i9100 CyanogenMod 7.1 kernel with BLN support.
Details available here.
ImWarped said:
CM 7.1 Stable has working bluetooth, and it wasn't a kernel issue, it was a driver source problem, Cyanogen either cracked it ahead of everyone else, or, got access to the missing source code, either way, winning like Charlie Sheen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, driver issues are not the same as the kernel.
I'd love to see some kernel supporting gpu oc-uv, it's a good feature for battery saving purposes imho.
vnvman said:
I'd love to see some kernel supporting gpu oc-uv, it's a good feature for battery saving purposes imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use siyah kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9100
This is a discussion and information thread for the progress of stock based rom development.
I want to keep you up to date for the current development progress and invite you to join or discuss about new projects.
First I want to introduce to you the people who are involved in this current project.
Hashcode (STS-Dev-Team)
Deveshmanish
Ravikirancg
alteredlikeness
Biotik
Each one here is working on its own projects, but we are statically in contact to help out each other, so this has some kind of a team character. But this is NOT something like a "closed team"! Everybody, every dev and everyone who wants is invited to be part of this new fast progressing kind of development for Roms, Kernels and all other Android stuff. I think we should not longer stay alone with our stuff because we can reach our goals much faster when working together - or at least being in contact and share our knowledge!
In example the last weeks have been full of success regarding to Kexec-, Kernel- and Stock-based development - with the big help of the people mentioned above!
Current Progress
Yesterday we made it to boot Catalyst Rom (VZW .16 - based) on my GSM device with full working service - with the first stock Kexec kernel! This opens many new possibilities and brings our good old Razr on a new level - AGAIN!
Now we have a working kexec setup for stock based roms and I made a GSM- and a CDMA-Patch, so all users - no matter what region their devices are from - can run all stock-based rom - also no matter which stock kernel they have installed on their devices!
First, I will release a "Kexec-Patch" which can be flashed over ANY Stock-based rom to boot it on ANY device - including the needed network patches! The kernel has been finished and I will release it tonight. Note that this kernel is not modified in a way like JBX-Kernel! It is a copy of stock kernel which was made ready for kexec by the STS-Dev-Team!
Next, we make a Custom-Kernel for stock-based roms with mods like JBX-Kernel! The first Rom to run with it will be Catalyst v3!
We don't want to keep our work only for our projects - everyone should have access to it! Each dev should be able to use it for his work! It's free and open source - and it should behandled like this!
Devs are invited to join our group hangouts on Google Plus! Together we will make fast progress in all kind of development! PM me for access!
I will keep you up to date in this thread!
- reserved -
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
jessel0001 said:
Excellent news! I was wondering, when you said full working service, did that happen to include 1080p video and HDMI? I know the other kexec Roms have these issues.
Regardless of my question, truly amazing work.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On kexec stock the camera seems working fully, yes. But service meant to be Networks.
so... in near future with the "new" kexec + f.e. cm 10.1 and we have everything working ?? or it will only fully work with 4.1.2 firmware... ??
Great ideea !
Thank you
The camera only works fine for Stock based roms because it uses the original cam libs. But we cannot use the cam libs on AOSP roms! Tghe cam drivers are partly closed source, that's what makes it difficult. But Hashcode is working on that.
Edit: Just released the patches, see dev section.
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
justen7723 said:
Ok new guy here.... What the he!! is the difference in kexec and catalyst can someone explain all this to me easily?? Im coming from a gnexus and have know idea what this really means. I gather it a good thing for all of us but it's all very confusing to me still. So for being the noob!!!!
Sent from my XT912 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec is a method to bypass our Razr's locked bootloader and run Custom Kernels.
The main problem with the locked bootloader is that we cannot reun custom kernels - usually. And also we cannot use any stock kernel - i.e. when a GSM user wants to use a stock-based CDMA Custom rom he used to wipe the CID (region check) to be able to flash the CDMA kernel which is needed to run this. But thanks to the secure version which are being checked by bootloader users who have updated to Moto official JB cannot flash the VZW kernel anymore - so they cannot use the CDMA roms!
Now we have KExec! This allows us to run any rom on a custom kernel! The metnioned problems are history now.
But besides of that it allows us to run JB AOSP Roms on Custom Kernels - just like my JBX-Kernel.
You are coming from G-Nex? Well, you might know how many kernels are available for G-Nex - and what nice features they provide (OC, GPU OC, BLX, BLN, etc, etc..). My JBX-Kernel provides a lot of these features to the Razr owners All that wouldn't be possible without kexec.
rhyrlix said:
So if I flash the Patch on CM 10.1 or AOKP, the camera will not recording in Full HD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO! And I explained the reason already. PLEASE FORGET THAT VERY FAST!
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
rhyrlix said:
And about the battery consumption? After flashed the patch, the battery life will be bad like CM 10.1 and AOKP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, it will be like stock.
I need someones help! I have to rebuild the moto_crypto module to make the JBX-Stock-Kernel working on VZW-Based Roms!
But I am not really aware of shell script language. Could someone please tell me how to link the Makefile(s), etc to connect this module source to the kernel source?
Or at least read the build script you find in the linked source and tell me what exactly is set there (I understand most parts - but not enough)
https://github.com/dtrail/kernel_mapphone_kexec/tree/stock-mod/motorola/security/moto_crypto
Ediot: Nevermind, got it.
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
h0324879 said:
Question, using Motorola stock kernel is better than a custom one right? I know it may be stepping your heart dtrail, I experience certain reboot a day due to dos, so in order to get boot again, I will have to flash your kernel again. It is quite annoying indeed. Such problem does not exist in stock rom. You know, I choose Motorola because I trust in its built quality, I trust in its stability.
Apart from that, the new progress mentioned here means we can use Motorola kernel to run any aosp rom, am I figure out in the right track?
Thank you so much!
Sent from my XT910 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You misunderstood. Please read the OP more carefully - I explained that question several times now (regarding to the benefits of the current kernel)
To your problem: I don't have that problem. My phone runs multiple days (until 1 week) without any problems (and not a single reboot). And for me the custom kernel is much better than stock because I get better battery life, performance and options. Many users reported the same in the kernel thread. So yours must be a device related or usage related problem.
I don't know your settings, so I cannot help you with that. You can do tjat: Make screenshots from all Trickster Mod pages that I can see your settings.
Although I'm using a Razr XT912,I'm so glad seeing all these development goin' so fast. Thanks a lot,dtrail1. You've been doing a great job for XT910 users especially this Razr community in general. I've been in love with your JBX kernel.
Sent from my XT897 using Tapatalk 2
Little update
Currently fixing 4.3 JBX. This could take some more time than thought before..But it will work, that's the most important thing now.
The Stock Core Kernel which is a direct JBX port for Stock based roms is almost finished! I will launch a testing phase this week.
MIUI is kind of special - who knows ? Actually I can boot and run the Stock Core kernel with it but the UI is kind of slow. The log is telling me nothing so I have to dig deeper.
But because I am working on all of these projects on my own it will take time. Be patient and stay tuned!
Besides of the Kernel(s) I am working together with Biotik on Catalyst Project and also currently merging STS-Dev-Team's progress on the completely rebuilt 3.0.31 and 3.0.88 Kernel....Great things are coming, yes! But I have to be on my own - Seems like that!
I am still waiting for someone's contribution into my projects - but also loosing hope slowly...
Thanks man
Is it possible to download it yet?
Not sure, if it is possible...
But, due to the fact, that Rebellos is inactive and volk204 obviously stopped development and Tigrouzen also quit ZenDroKat, we have to look for new devs to continue work on Android development on Wave devices...
Next target should be Android 4.4.3...
What do you think?
I am pretty much sure the last developer that is willing to work is both rebellos and volk.
I have one dev here in poland, but No on XDA. I tell him about that )
In my opinion...
Better move is to answer here the truth about further Develpment:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1459391&page=3
Please our main Developer:
@volk204
@Rebellos
Is this end of Development for S8500 and S8530?
@Tigrouzen
I saw only you have removed your work from your site...
I know no details nor reason...
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
Yes...
It seems to be the end...
Taxidriver05 said:
Yes...
It seems to be the end...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
End , but @volk204 , @Rebellos @Tigrouzen i request u plz make kernel for wave3 , nd support adfree , team work :good:
How bout u guys try compiling yourself?
I mean they're already many guides out there, So anyone can learn and compile there own Rom!
And I do t think it makes any point to compile a rom with same bugs etc...
I'd rather focus on fixing present bugs then compiling a new rom,
Anyways, M not being disrespectful or something, but telling u the fact!
But if u guys really want then I can compile Rom, but kernel is a bit complicated for me,
So Team work is best!
Cheers.
How bout u guys try compiling yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good idea... but...
I think if some users are waiting, and we waiting very long during all this time...
years.
So maybe it is not wrong, if main Developers could tell us...
discontinued or not...
As you can see, Rebellos for instance, not more talk in public...
...but he is "active" in XDA...
In my opinion it is an question of respect...
We are not married... but it is strange... that so many Devs left project...
But nobody is able to say good bye...
hero355 is good example. Check his Signature:
I'm out of from bada development! Thanks all who were interested my Rom and all works on bada.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx hero355, he made things for bada and more and he is fair...
Because he knows few users have hope for his help...
And Rebellos for instance could update his Thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1459391
""Sorry, no more updates"" or something similar...
Nobody will kill him.
Really easy task...
Best Regards
Compiling is a thing, fixing bugs another.
I can compile ROM or kernel, and changes some in sources for rom and kernel (making Bigmem, SD or Nand kernels for example), but i can't solve any bugs, because it need a knowledge i don't have, and few here have this knowledge...
Well...
I think, we have all abilities...
GT-S85XX are no problem anymore...
GT-S8600 Bootloader is nearly open for Android...
I tihnk, GT-S8600 is a good device to run Android 4.4.3...
Loyal tester, user & fan
After hundreds of flash still back to bada now..
Thank you to all developers
Just made little customization rom base on china's LC2 bada
2.0 source..
WFFARREL
As from my side - the project is discontinued. I'm not interested in working on it anymore. Thanks for such a long time "together".
As from my side - the project is discontinued. I'm not interested in working on it anymore. Thanks for such a long time "together".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for answer.
So we know now actual status from our project leader Rebellos.
@volk204
Please, could you answer also...
Continue or end of Development for Wave 1 and 2 ?
Btw. it is NO shame to end projects.
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
adfree said:
Thank you very much for answer.
So we know now actual status from our project leader Rebellos.
@volk204
Please, could you answer also...
Continue or end of Development for Wave 1 and 2 ?
Btw. it is NO shame to end projects.
Thanx in advance.
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi adfree
I think it is near end. I can't fix functional kernel issue like charger without Rebellos.
Now i'm very busy with real life
And my USB is completely broken, but i hope i will repair it.
But i think i can find time to build new releases and support RIL bugs, if we will find it.
Regards
Nikolay
volk204 thank you very much for fast answer.
So we know actual status.
Thanx.
Best Regards
volk204 said:
Now i'm very busy with real life
And my USB is completely broken, but i hope i will repair it.
But i think i can find time to build new releases and support RIL bugs, if we will find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mr. Volk, if you repair your cable and find time for it, is it possible to put latest updates (GPS, modem etc.) on your 4.1.2 rom for one last time? Your roms was really good. A bit slow but number of bugs are very very small. Because of that I always prefer your roms. Thank you for your all works.
Best regards
@volk204
- Could you help us to build Android Kernel on first place, then later ROM for S8600 WAVE3.
Because adfree already hacked bootloader and its opened now for new OS.
If you get some free time, please, take look and try to help us.
Thanx in advance for you help.
Someone asked earlier to compile Oleg sources, here is what i got after compiling with "make PROJECTNAME=s8600" : http://www.multiupload.nl/01QBHIU857
I have absolutely no idea on how to use this, look like it's little kernel made to boot android kernel.
BenzoX said:
Someone asked earlier to compile Oleg sources, here is what i got after compiling with "make PROJECTNAME=s8600" : http://www.multiupload.nl/01QBHIU857
I have absolutely no idea on how to use this, look like it's little kernel made to boot android kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@BenzoX its kernel, thank you very very much..
@adfree you must try this, i think you finally can finish this.
Galaxy3HELL said:
@BenzoX its kernel, thank you very very much..
@adfree you must try this, i think you finally can finish this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After some search, it look like it's "Little" kernel, some kind of bootloader. It load some function (see here for more info : https://www.codeaurora.org/blogs/little-kernel-based-android-bootloader, i don't find lot of doc about it) but i highly doubt it can boot the whole android system.