What's everyone getting on which ROM, kernel and CPU oc/uv program?
(not sure if this belongs in Q/A or not )
I just got 3799 using the set up below and CPU tuner + virtuos overclock , I got 5000 odd yesterday ?
I still ain't getting any more than 3900 , even uninstalling virtuos overclock controller for sleep n wake, and setting my pc to full power , with my brightness down and all tasks killed in taskmanager.
Try backing down the frequency you set your processor to. I get crappy scores at 1.86 but over 6000 at 1.78. Every chip is different.
What is your setup?ROM,Kernel and mods?Im running Eternity 1.4 w/ziggy's latest kernel and no other mods. Ive gotten [email protected] (reboots at 1.8ghz) and just tested now, [email protected] Try playing around with the governor, Im using setcpu with lagfree.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1.78ghz stock de-sensed
Infected ROM eternity 1.4.1.
Ziggy dual core kernel @
1.7
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA App
This is with CleanROM 2.7 (included kernel, no tweaks) not even breaking a sweat. Governor was set to conservative and I'm running "only" 1.62 GHZ OC. I don't like to run it at max. This ROM is a great combo of speed and reliability.
Mike
justj said:
1.78ghz stock de-sensed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what launcher are you using ??? do you have many widgets ? many apps installed ? have your wifi enabled ? does this matter do you think ?
I'm one who wants to always get the most out of his phone, but you guys do realize that with numbers like these, it is almost impossible to find any app that is going to have lag, so why even bother to go faster? At these speeds, you're now limited by things like your (data) connection speed and SD card read/write speed. So if we make these things faster, we're never going to see a difference anyway.
Just a does of reality. I don't think many of us use our phones to do number crunching, calculating pi to a billion digits, or use them to process SETI data to search for alien transmissions. Playing Angry Birds at 1.8 Ghz with both dual cores forced online isn't going to look any different than it does stock... except maybe your left hand gets warmer while holding the phone.
Mike
gav-collins1983 said:
what launcher are you using ??? do you have many widgets ? many apps installed ? have your wifi enabled ? does this matter do you think ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have launcher Pro with many widgets and apps installed. wifi, date everything on. As I found turnning airplane mode on doesn't really matters.
mikeyxda said:
Just a does of reality. I don't think many of us use our phones to do number crunching, calculating pi to a billion digits, or use them to process SETI data to search for alien transmissions. Playing Angry Birds at 1.8 Ghz with both dual cores forced online isn't going to look any different than it does stock... except maybe your left hand gets warmer while holding the phone.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think anyone will run their cpu at max all the time. Not with stock battery anyway. My daily setup is 1.02GHz single core UV @ 950mV. I play games like 9mm, ShadowGun etc and never had any problem with that speed.
Related
ok i've done everything apart from muffle system logging and max blocker (both fail to install for some reason =S ) , BUT in Govnah the 1st core shows the speed of going upto 1.512GHz, but the 2nd core doesn't go higher than 192MHz...why is that??
ace9988 said:
ok i've done everything apart from muffle system logging and max blocker (both fail to install for some reason =S ) , BUT in Govnah the 1st core shows the speed of going upto 1.512GHz, but the 2nd core doesn't go higher than 192MHz...why is that??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It only goes up if it needs it to perform some task. If you're sitting there watching it, it won't go up as it is not needed.
That is a power saving feature of dual cores.
yh but the graph that shows it hasn't gone higher than 192MHz for a while...wheras the 1st core keeps cycling at many different speeds, and i've run everything to get that second core going...but it still won't
What kernel? This has been a known issue with f15. Change the govenor to "ondemand" instead of "ctlondemand". I switched to warthog and dont have the issue anymore.
BTW....not saying its better. Just works for me
using the F4 kernel, both cores will run at the max speed you put, and when it's idling and not doing anything, will run at the lowest speed you put. I totally recmomend it. make sure you leave what ever governer is on the f4 kernel, if you don't, then the second core will stay at the min speed you put, thus not doing much.
thebadfrog said:
What kernel? This has been a known issue with f15. Change the govenor to "ondemand" instead of "ctlondemand". I switched to warthog and dont have the issue anymore.
BTW....not saying its better. Just works for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm using uberkernel 22- on demandtcl 1512
go play a 720p YouTube video if fits smooth then everything's fine. I don't get peoples obsession with needing it to go up and down.
durps said:
using the F4 kernel, both cores will run at the max speed you put, and when it's idling and not doing anything, will run at the lowest speed you put. I totally recmomend it. make sure you leave what ever governer is on the f4 kernel, if you don't, then the second core will stay at the min speed you put, thus not doing much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
f4 is working really nicely over 2 weeks now. 1.8 both cores. set the min the lowest. still all day battery life.
3 words "Lithium ENYO BenchMark"
test and report your 2nd core activity via govnah... (running in background during test)
edit: "Lithium ENYO BenchMark" eh.... its ok at getting a result but not as much as some more mainstream activities and i now question its "bench marking validity". but the 2nd core is obviously active
look closely as the graph moves quicky depending on your settings
---------- Post added at 04:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 AM ----------
i get mixed results but i always see activity from core 2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
the 2nd is actually while playing a 720 vid
both using "uber kernel" ondemand not the ondemandctl
Now I know benchmarks are not that accurate but I figured I would ask about this anyway and see what everyone else thinks...
First, whenever I run linpack I only score anywhere between 12 and 16 overclocked @ 1.8...even my og Evo got about 40 so just wanted some input on that...
And second, when I run quadrant the first 12 tests go real slow but them I seem to still score from 2500-3000 but when I looked at the system info it said my phone was only a single core...kinda thought it was strange...here's the screen shot so you can see what I'm talking about
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just a couple questions I had but not really urgent...still, any input is much appreciated
Sent from my MIUI'd 3VO (Finally switched)
I am guessing that you have the CPU overclocked too much and it is choking on the benchmarks. Try lowering your clock to 1500 and see if you get the same results.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
htc phones have always fallen short on benchmarks dont worry it doesnt rlly say anything about real life performance. yeh it says one core you have 2 is it using both for the test? the world may never know
Yea looks like it isn't picking up second core for testing, hut the second core shouldn't be on all the time anyways, look for a dual core supported benchmark,
I believe cf bench is good for dual core,
And yea linpack borks when oc to far,
~Shot from my shooter in 3D~
~injected with cleanrom~
not to hijack the thread, but i didn't want to start a new post, and can't post in the developers section yet.
I just flashed myns warmtwopointthree and when running nenamark 2 i get about 20fps, I got about 26 on stock before root. I haven't messed with the cpu yet as i just flashed it, but i was wondering if anyone knows whats up with it.
I just don't want to sift through 2,500+ replies to find out. i read in the latest release notes that the gpu was overclocked but i'm getting worse performance. I wanted higher performance so i chose that rom. Anyone know why?
Unfortunately most apps are not multithreaded which means they're only going to use one core anyway. So if you want to see how your average app will perform, Quadrant is actually pretty good because it is written like most apps: for a single core.
If you want a benchmark more indicative of what the hardware is actually capable of, a multi-core test like CF Bench or SmartBench 2011 is in order. Unfortunately, I've found that the governors on most ROM's are not up to the task and they actually slow things down quite a bit so if you want max performance (numbers in the tests), you need to use SetCPU or a similar tool and choose the "performance" governor otherwise the phone will be jumping around at various clock speeds for all the tests. I've tried the "lag free", "smartass" and all the governors and none of them (on any ROM I've tested) truly know how to keep the CPU at your max frequency even when doing the demanding tasks that the benchmarks throw at it.
Mike
So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
This is not all that much a "development" thread as a collective piece. I would like to see from you all if the drivers posted on the front page actually have any affect on our device....or maybe I am just crazy.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/updated-adreno-220-ics-gpu-driver-speeds-up-2d-rendering/
I am personally seeing an increase 2D up from ~300ish to well over 600 to 700, while a slight decrease in 3D.
Simply set to interactive Min: 128 Max: 1782 noop scheduler
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
bit1 said:
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just installed these over webcm9 cornerstone aokp and i've noticed a definite improvement at least in games. Not placebo at least in my eyes. But then again that's the best placebo. All i know is that all my games are running better. Thanks for the tip. Do they exynos drivers as well?
It actually brought my Quadrant speed down significantly..... From 3266 to 2571.
In what setup were you getting 3266?
somesayinice said:
In what setup were you getting 3266?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eyeballer's Nightly 05-07, 160dpi, 384mhz to 1782mhz. Pretty standard... Didn't mess with the 2d setting in settings.
FWIW, I'm getting over 3100.
Running CM9 official nightly 20120507, 192-1512mhz interactive governor, adreno drivers from OP.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
This is my result using the latest CM Min: 128 Max: 1782
Performance increase in both Quadrant and games. Subjectively I would say more than 20% in Reckless Racing 1 & 2 and in Real Racing!
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
kcodya said:
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I notice a huge difference in certain applications. Most notably scrolling through apps in the play store. It used to be ultra choppy, now it is bearable.
Here is a zip that'll flash on the Touchpad:
http://www.mediafire.com/?cnbbz06kl2mv6ix
As always, before flashing make sure to backup or be ready to reflash your rom.
I am running AOKP MS5, if that makes any difference.
Edit: Just noticed he had a zip for other devices attached to the post.
Moved to general, please continue.
Using the driver from the OP, I have the following observations;
2d is MUCH smoother, not my imagination, especially when panning between home screens.
Before, a few times a day it would be unresponsive to touch when coming out of sleep, more likely if it had just recently gone to sleep. Usually this was resolved by hitting the power button twice, only rarely requiring a hard reboot. After installing the 213 drivers 2 days ago, this has yet to happen. If it matters, I use pattern lock.
Haven't found any new bugs yet. Tonight I'll try the new 218 drivers and run a new benchmark.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
with this driver i got a lower benchmark point rate.
Lower gfx score here too. Can't comment on apps yet.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
here are my results with adreno 220 v218
latest cm9 nightly 20120513
min: 192 max: 1782
2D render enabled
density: 120dpi
What bench program are you guys using???
Remolten said:
What bench program are you guys using???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant, there's a free version at play store
I used AnTuTu.
I already use Antutu just wondering what the one in that post was (quadrant).
i have a jelly bean rom on my phone and for a while it worked fine with a custom kernel. then it started to freeze as soon as i hit the lock button. so it wouldnt turn back on. it always does it now. but when i take off the kernel it works fine with the stock jb rom kernel. ive tried slim bean, cm10, helly bean and they all freeze with a custom kernel. they use the devil or sephamore kernel. both give me the same problem and i dont know what is causing it when the kernels were meant to work on these roms. some help would be much appreciated
Are you overclocking or anything? Undervolting? Live OC? Maybe your phone can't handle it.
theexel said:
Are you overclocking or anything? Undervolting? Live OC? Maybe your phone can't handle it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its overclocked to 1.3 ghz with this kernel but it should be able to handle it. i used to run it at 1.6 on gingerbread and ics roms. the devil kernel ran fine with with live overclock on ics. im using sephamore on jb with live overclock of 105% and its undervolted. i dont know if this is the problem though as i used to run at higher clock speeds with undervolting and live overclock.
Try flashing the kernel, but don't overclock or undervolt.
See if it reboots/hangs.
Then try just overclocking.
Then try just undervolting.
Etc.
Just so we can narrow down the problem.
Also, is deep idle enabled?
Edit: May I ask why you overclock so high?
If it's for performance, you're much better Live OC'ing like 10% and leaving the min at 200 + the Live OC.
Heck, maybe even 20%, it'll be super snappy.
Unless you play games, then I understand.
My settings:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
theexel said:
Try flashing the kernel, but don't overclock or undervolt.
See if it reboots/hangs.
Then try just overclocking.
Then try just undervolting.
Etc.
Just so we can narrow down the problem.
Also, is deep idle enabled?
Edit: May I ask why you overclock so high?
If it's for performance, you're much better Live OC'ing like 10% and leaving the min at 200 + the Live OC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ill try that out and i disabled deep idle i think it still does it. if i awaken my phone periodically it wont reboot.
and i used to just because i could i usually kept the max at around 1.5 ghz. i would just use 1.6 maybe for some heavier games. but now the processor is only at 1.3 ghz and 1.46 with the devil kernel as i dont play much games anymore.
i keep my min at 200.
and when i flash the kernel do you want me to leave it alone not change the governor or scheduler? or anything of that sort?
actually i have live oc to 130% i was thinking of the devil kernel i tried earlier sorry.
How are you disabling Deep Idle?
With the Kernel app or NSTools, or?
Do it with the kernel app.
Let me try some higher settings real quick just to get an idea.
Yeah, leave it how it comes.
Ondemand is fine if you want battery life and for the ROM to be snappy.
Noop is fine, too.
Smartmassv2 seems laggy on this kernel.
theexel said:
How are you disabling Deep Idle?
With the Kernel app or NSTools, or?
Do it with the kernel app.
Let me try some higher settings real quick just to get an idea.
Yeah, leave it how it comes.
Ondemand is fine if you want battery life and for the ROM to be snappy.
Noop is fine, too.
Smartmassv2 seems laggy on this kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i used nstools and also i have smooth profiles on and the overclock is running at 1.3 ghz yours is around 1 ish? did you set it in the kernel app to set the clock speed? my smartassV2 seema to be faster with me. I am running sio scheduler with SmartassV2.
i am going to start playing with the settings now.
may i ask what rom and kernel you had working?