So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409
Related
Post your Quadrant benchmark results here.
Quadrant is a benchmarking tool that rates and scores your device on a number of categories.
Can be downloaded from the market
When posting can you please mention:
~Device name
~If your using a stock or custom ROM
~Any lagfixes
~Custom tweaks or mods.
QR CODE
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Scan with "Barcode Scanner" from market.
---------- Post added at 11:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 PM ----------
1st mine
Here is mine
CyanogenMod 7 2.3.5 cooper KANG
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Jun Hong said:
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of benchmarking with a mount hack?
What's the point comparing scores of the most unreliable benchmark, except for knowing whose e-magic-stick is the longest?
quadrant
my maximum score was 2004 on kang cm7 after deleting some system apps and tweakig it by myself. my usual scores are around 1900-1950 with many apps on it. i will try with the booster too to see the limits and tell you!
EDIT:2364!!!! f*** this is insane!!
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
~Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830
~CyanoAce beta3
New score
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Dekkerlion said:
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the performance governer and a little change in dpi + Killing all tasks
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
mine with original Samsung firmware 2.3.3
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
kyle_nexus said:
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
*Do'oh! The quadrant scores really make me miss the CM7.1 nightlies. Okay a question fellas. Do you find a positive correlation between your Quadrant Score and the performance of flash in browser e.g. Dolphin HD or Maxthon etc
Stock XWKS2 (Android 2.3.5) + several Tweaks from this forum
First screen is from Quadrant, second is from Antutu.
Mine. . .
my new rom, cm7 based icecream sunday coming tomorrow. be online at 12pm to get your copy.
Expectation < Reality
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
these are my best scores.. quadrant score is different in every test..
cyanoace by behradGH
oc kernel by ketut.kumajaya, set to 844Mhz
v6 supercharger script update 8
sd card speed booster app..set to 2650..
consegregate said:
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My device is SHW-M110S running Gingerbread 2.3.5. The screen capturing for my device is back button + power button but when in quadrant it goes back to quadrant menu. I also tried other button combo.
In normal mode at 1.0 Ghz I got 2,000'ish score and in overclocked at 1.3Ghz I got 3,000'ish score.
I'd really like to screen cap the results.
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
Now I know benchmarks are not that accurate but I figured I would ask about this anyway and see what everyone else thinks...
First, whenever I run linpack I only score anywhere between 12 and 16 overclocked @ 1.8...even my og Evo got about 40 so just wanted some input on that...
And second, when I run quadrant the first 12 tests go real slow but them I seem to still score from 2500-3000 but when I looked at the system info it said my phone was only a single core...kinda thought it was strange...here's the screen shot so you can see what I'm talking about
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just a couple questions I had but not really urgent...still, any input is much appreciated
Sent from my MIUI'd 3VO (Finally switched)
I am guessing that you have the CPU overclocked too much and it is choking on the benchmarks. Try lowering your clock to 1500 and see if you get the same results.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
htc phones have always fallen short on benchmarks dont worry it doesnt rlly say anything about real life performance. yeh it says one core you have 2 is it using both for the test? the world may never know
Yea looks like it isn't picking up second core for testing, hut the second core shouldn't be on all the time anyways, look for a dual core supported benchmark,
I believe cf bench is good for dual core,
And yea linpack borks when oc to far,
~Shot from my shooter in 3D~
~injected with cleanrom~
not to hijack the thread, but i didn't want to start a new post, and can't post in the developers section yet.
I just flashed myns warmtwopointthree and when running nenamark 2 i get about 20fps, I got about 26 on stock before root. I haven't messed with the cpu yet as i just flashed it, but i was wondering if anyone knows whats up with it.
I just don't want to sift through 2,500+ replies to find out. i read in the latest release notes that the gpu was overclocked but i'm getting worse performance. I wanted higher performance so i chose that rom. Anyone know why?
Unfortunately most apps are not multithreaded which means they're only going to use one core anyway. So if you want to see how your average app will perform, Quadrant is actually pretty good because it is written like most apps: for a single core.
If you want a benchmark more indicative of what the hardware is actually capable of, a multi-core test like CF Bench or SmartBench 2011 is in order. Unfortunately, I've found that the governors on most ROM's are not up to the task and they actually slow things down quite a bit so if you want max performance (numbers in the tests), you need to use SetCPU or a similar tool and choose the "performance" governor otherwise the phone will be jumping around at various clock speeds for all the tests. I've tried the "lag free", "smartass" and all the governors and none of them (on any ROM I've tested) truly know how to keep the CPU at your max frequency even when doing the demanding tasks that the benchmarks throw at it.
Mike
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys feel that stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
mforminio7 said:
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys real stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll learn very quick here that many believe quadrant to be insanely inaccurate. Only look at antutu for results.
Tho benchmarks vary, it all matters how fluid the phone feels while using it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
and everyone knows that most all benchmarks are hit or miss... it all about how it feels to you
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Khayos said:
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about gingerbread stock vs non stock kernels not ics. I know ics scores higher in benchmarks.
I get 2550 using quadrant and its pretty much the same every time and I'm stock but I take these app with a grain of salt.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Lol I got 1730 with DSBs on 1.8ghz, obviously thats waayy wrong. I got higher than that with my old Desire at 1.15ghz, my old galaxy got over 3k a lot. Lol.
This is not all that much a "development" thread as a collective piece. I would like to see from you all if the drivers posted on the front page actually have any affect on our device....or maybe I am just crazy.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/updated-adreno-220-ics-gpu-driver-speeds-up-2d-rendering/
I am personally seeing an increase 2D up from ~300ish to well over 600 to 700, while a slight decrease in 3D.
Simply set to interactive Min: 128 Max: 1782 noop scheduler
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
bit1 said:
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just installed these over webcm9 cornerstone aokp and i've noticed a definite improvement at least in games. Not placebo at least in my eyes. But then again that's the best placebo. All i know is that all my games are running better. Thanks for the tip. Do they exynos drivers as well?
It actually brought my Quadrant speed down significantly..... From 3266 to 2571.
In what setup were you getting 3266?
somesayinice said:
In what setup were you getting 3266?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eyeballer's Nightly 05-07, 160dpi, 384mhz to 1782mhz. Pretty standard... Didn't mess with the 2d setting in settings.
FWIW, I'm getting over 3100.
Running CM9 official nightly 20120507, 192-1512mhz interactive governor, adreno drivers from OP.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
This is my result using the latest CM Min: 128 Max: 1782
Performance increase in both Quadrant and games. Subjectively I would say more than 20% in Reckless Racing 1 & 2 and in Real Racing!
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
kcodya said:
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I notice a huge difference in certain applications. Most notably scrolling through apps in the play store. It used to be ultra choppy, now it is bearable.
Here is a zip that'll flash on the Touchpad:
http://www.mediafire.com/?cnbbz06kl2mv6ix
As always, before flashing make sure to backup or be ready to reflash your rom.
I am running AOKP MS5, if that makes any difference.
Edit: Just noticed he had a zip for other devices attached to the post.
Moved to general, please continue.
Using the driver from the OP, I have the following observations;
2d is MUCH smoother, not my imagination, especially when panning between home screens.
Before, a few times a day it would be unresponsive to touch when coming out of sleep, more likely if it had just recently gone to sleep. Usually this was resolved by hitting the power button twice, only rarely requiring a hard reboot. After installing the 213 drivers 2 days ago, this has yet to happen. If it matters, I use pattern lock.
Haven't found any new bugs yet. Tonight I'll try the new 218 drivers and run a new benchmark.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
with this driver i got a lower benchmark point rate.
Lower gfx score here too. Can't comment on apps yet.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
here are my results with adreno 220 v218
latest cm9 nightly 20120513
min: 192 max: 1782
2D render enabled
density: 120dpi
What bench program are you guys using???
Remolten said:
What bench program are you guys using???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant, there's a free version at play store
I used AnTuTu.
I already use Antutu just wondering what the one in that post was (quadrant).
Just a fun and informative way to see everyone's benchmarks. Also see how each rom or kernel is performing. Please let us know what benchmark app you are using along with the rom and kernel. :thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Padawan JB v2 rom oc @ 1512Mhz smartassv2 gov / sio scheduler
8132 score - CM 9.1 - 1.8ghz - Performance & sio - flapp's latest.
However, I usually run at 1134 and would take the pepsi challenge with any overclocked JB rom as far as responsiveness, speed, and battery life.
I need to try and lower my clock speed and see if it helps any. My scores are messed up due to lack of speed in sd-card reading/writing. Very low. In the 100-200 range for both
sent from my sending thing
There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing
androidmechanic said:
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*
JamieD81 said:
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow!! You just keep pumpin em out, eh? You slid that one out without me even knowing. Last build of yours I was on was SuperNexus and I absolutely loved the stable, smooth, and quite speedy vanilla experience. I was in 8500's on AntuTu with SN
...sent from my sending thing
Herw is mine, blackjelly rom. Quadrant was 2985
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©
shayneflashindaily said:
I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Waiting for the Note 3 to come in sept./oct this year. Ill be due for my upgrade. Looks like we getting the snapdragon 800
...sent from my sending thing
7503 with antutu
3297 with quadrant
Stock 4.1.2 rom rooted
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app
Here is mine oc at 1780
...sent from my sending thing