[ Post your benchmarks ] Samsung Galaxy Note I717 - AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717

Just a fun and informative way to see everyone's benchmarks. Also see how each rom or kernel is performing. Please let us know what benchmark app you are using along with the rom and kernel. :thumbup:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Padawan JB v2 rom oc @ 1512Mhz smartassv2 gov / sio scheduler

8132 score - CM 9.1 - 1.8ghz - Performance & sio - flapp's latest.
However, I usually run at 1134 and would take the pepsi challenge with any overclocked JB rom as far as responsiveness, speed, and battery life.

I need to try and lower my clock speed and see if it helps any. My scores are messed up due to lack of speed in sd-card reading/writing. Very low. In the 100-200 range for both
sent from my sending thing

There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©

shayneflashindaily said:
There was a thread for this a while back .... But I had the highest I'm pretty sure with quadrant ..... I hit a 4111
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing

androidmechanic said:
I haven't tried quadrant. I stay around 8 grand with AntuTu
...sent from my sending thing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*

JamieD81 said:
uber kernel which i just released with revolt i was hitting 9500+ @ 1.89ghz, performance gov, bfq i/o, gpu oc'd *that was with a class2 sdcard loaded*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow!! You just keep pumpin em out, eh? You slid that one out without me even knowing. Last build of yours I was on was SuperNexus and I absolutely loved the stable, smooth, and quite speedy vanilla experience. I was in 8500's on AntuTu with SN
...sent from my sending thing

Herw is mine, blackjelly rom. Quadrant was 2985
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©

shayneflashindaily said:
I ran saurom back in the day over clocked like crazy but set up right ... I was running very light barely any apps ..kept the Bare minimum... 4111...highest jb ROM quadrant I think I hit high 3000s...but its hit or miss with quadrant ... And not only that our phone can only do so much
...as long as it functions smooth and seemless I have no worries.
£|@$h•h°|i©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Waiting for the Note 3 to come in sept./oct this year. Ill be due for my upgrade. Looks like we getting the snapdragon 800
...sent from my sending thing

7503 with antutu
3297 with quadrant
Stock 4.1.2 rom rooted

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app

Here is mine oc at 1780
...sent from my sending thing

Related

Post your Quadrant result Screenshot Here

Post your Quadrant benchmark results here.
Quadrant is a benchmarking tool that rates and scores your device on a number of categories.
Can be downloaded from the market
When posting can you please mention:
~Device name
~If your using a stock or custom ROM
~Any lagfixes
~Custom tweaks or mods.
QR CODE
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Scan with "Barcode Scanner" from market.
---------- Post added at 11:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 PM ----------
1st mine
Here is mine
CyanogenMod 7 2.3.5 cooper KANG
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Jun Hong said:
on cyanogenmod (beghrad's) 1975 with quadrant booster
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of benchmarking with a mount hack?
What's the point comparing scores of the most unreliable benchmark, except for knowing whose e-magic-stick is the longest?
quadrant
my maximum score was 2004 on kang cm7 after deleting some system apps and tweakig it by myself. my usual scores are around 1900-1950 with many apps on it. i will try with the booster too to see the limits and tell you!
EDIT:2364!!!! f*** this is insane!!
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
~Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830
~CyanoAce beta3
New score
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Dekkerlion said:
Woah buddy nice score there.Can you tell us how you achieved it?
I have managed to get to 1760 just with tweaks from the ROM and then reflashed a couple of times.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With the performance governer and a little change in dpi + Killing all tasks
Infused with CM7 for Galaxy Ace using XDA App
mine with original Samsung firmware 2.3.3
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
kyle_nexus said:
quick questions guys.
what do you press if you screen capture the result?
back button + power button doesnt work for me.
thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
*Do'oh! The quadrant scores really make me miss the CM7.1 nightlies. Okay a question fellas. Do you find a positive correlation between your Quadrant Score and the performance of flash in browser e.g. Dolphin HD or Maxthon etc
Stock XWKS2 (Android 2.3.5) + several Tweaks from this forum
First screen is from Quadrant, second is from Antutu.
Mine. . .
my new rom, cm7 based icecream sunday coming tomorrow. be online at 12pm to get your copy.
Expectation < Reality
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
these are my best scores.. quadrant score is different in every test..
cyanoace by behradGH
oc kernel by ketut.kumajaya, set to 844Mhz
v6 supercharger script update 8
sd card speed booster app..set to 2650..
consegregate said:
Depends on your firmware. The older builds use back plus home, the newer ones use home plus power, cyanogenmod uses its own screencapturing method.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My device is SHW-M110S running Gingerbread 2.3.5. The screen capturing for my device is back button + power button but when in quadrant it goes back to quadrant menu. I also tried other button combo.
In normal mode at 1.0 Ghz I got 2,000'ish score and in overclocked at 1.3Ghz I got 3,000'ish score.
I'd really like to screen cap the results.
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App

[Q]High quadrant scores?

So I hate benchmarks but I got bored so I ran a quadrant on my tab...I got 4221...is that a mistake?
wow. seems great to me. I was getting about 2500. I switch my governor to performance and it jumped up to over 3500 though. I've got ally of apps though so I figure not bad for me either. What's you governor set at getting over 4000?
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
KaFrEEkAbOom said:
Well guyz You should try a new rom to get High Scores on your quardrent tests
Well Here is a few roms that i used to get high quardrent scores
Paris rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1284355 - Personally I love this rom because it overclockes my Tab and give me 3000++ scores
Starbust Rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1197776 -This one also overclockes your processor to 1.4Ghz and improves I/O and other graphic values
I think This post would helpful for you If so Please Click on Thanks Button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok...not to be mean...don't tell me what is helpful or not...
btw: i dont CARE about benchmark scores...AT ALL!!!!!
i just wondered why it was so high since engadget and other review sites say its like 1000.
@benzoman - just stock settings on cm9 preview (rootzwiki)
Running Task 14 overclocked to 1400 here. Couldn't get me to change ROMs for almost anything. Unless it was to an updated Task ROM. I'm running some of pershoots kernel stuff too.
Don't really care about benchmarks myself either. Just thought I'd run the quadrant to see what I got compared to what you got.
As long as it's stable and doesn't lag that's all I care.
Task has always taken VERY good care of me in all aspects of what I want, and need. So that's why I'm so partial to his stuff and suggestions of what to run with his ROMs.
Thanks mate for something to do at least for a few minutes.
EDIT: Just noticed both suggested ROMs are old Task ROMs too. LMAO
Yeah I'm running to change to an older ROM so my scores go up. NOT. :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
davsarus said:
tried many different roms and quadrant scores were different. never felt any difference on daily use of my tab though. Let's face it, we all are affected by that guy on that galaxytabhacks site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
ezcats said:
i know!!!!!
all he does...."alright lets just open up quadrant here and see what we get...2 mins later....alright thats the rom..it only got 2000..screw that..."
lol!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol glad that im not alone
Mine on ICS for the first time its benchmark is nearly 4000 too, my expression was like this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
well never mind, i can return to human form at anytime so benchmark is not really a big deal, just for showing off, i thought
what is actually your best score? i have about 4000 with cm9 from pershoot and 1.7.4 aacount-kernel.
Ran this on my tab with AOKP 4.1.2 and A1 Kernell 1.8.2 running at 1.6Ghz and only got 3435
My Tab is currently running Fourth Bar Revolution ICS 4.0.4 ROM with default ROM settings and Yoda Kernel 2.4.
Quadrant @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 2915
Quadrant @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 3317
Quadrant @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 3558
AnTuTu @ 1.2GHz (Interactive) = 6060
AnTuTu @ 1.4GHz (Interactive) = 6793
AnTuTu @ 1.6GHz (Interactive) = 7409

Kernel Benchmarks inconsistent

Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys feel that stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
mforminio7 said:
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys real stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll learn very quick here that many believe quadrant to be insanely inaccurate. Only look at antutu for results.
Tho benchmarks vary, it all matters how fluid the phone feels while using it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
and everyone knows that most all benchmarks are hit or miss... it all about how it feels to you
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Khayos said:
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about gingerbread stock vs non stock kernels not ics. I know ics scores higher in benchmarks.
I get 2550 using quadrant and its pretty much the same every time and I'm stock but I take these app with a grain of salt.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Lol I got 1730 with DSBs on 1.8ghz, obviously thats waayy wrong. I got higher than that with my old Desire at 1.15ghz, my old galaxy got over 3k a lot. Lol.

[FEEDBACK] Adreno 220 ICS GPU Driver

This is not all that much a "development" thread as a collective piece. I would like to see from you all if the drivers posted on the front page actually have any affect on our device....or maybe I am just crazy.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/updated-adreno-220-ics-gpu-driver-speeds-up-2d-rendering/
I am personally seeing an increase 2D up from ~300ish to well over 600 to 700, while a slight decrease in 3D.
Simply set to interactive Min: 128 Max: 1782 noop scheduler
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
bit1 said:
Hmmm. I installed the evo3d ones over 0509 nightly cm9. No ill effect. Seems faster but I believe that perception to be a placebo effect so far. Thanks OP
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just installed these over webcm9 cornerstone aokp and i've noticed a definite improvement at least in games. Not placebo at least in my eyes. But then again that's the best placebo. All i know is that all my games are running better. Thanks for the tip. Do they exynos drivers as well?
It actually brought my Quadrant speed down significantly..... From 3266 to 2571.
In what setup were you getting 3266?
somesayinice said:
In what setup were you getting 3266?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eyeballer's Nightly 05-07, 160dpi, 384mhz to 1782mhz. Pretty standard... Didn't mess with the 2d setting in settings.
FWIW, I'm getting over 3100.
Running CM9 official nightly 20120507, 192-1512mhz interactive governor, adreno drivers from OP.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
This is my result using the latest CM Min: 128 Max: 1782
Performance increase in both Quadrant and games. Subjectively I would say more than 20% in Reckless Racing 1 & 2 and in Real Racing!
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
kcodya said:
Try using the driver from this thread, it's newer than the one posted here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1643472
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I notice a huge difference in certain applications. Most notably scrolling through apps in the play store. It used to be ultra choppy, now it is bearable.
Here is a zip that'll flash on the Touchpad:
http://www.mediafire.com/?cnbbz06kl2mv6ix
As always, before flashing make sure to backup or be ready to reflash your rom.
I am running AOKP MS5, if that makes any difference.
Edit: Just noticed he had a zip for other devices attached to the post.
Moved to general, please continue.
Using the driver from the OP, I have the following observations;
2d is MUCH smoother, not my imagination, especially when panning between home screens.
Before, a few times a day it would be unresponsive to touch when coming out of sleep, more likely if it had just recently gone to sleep. Usually this was resolved by hitting the power button twice, only rarely requiring a hard reboot. After installing the 213 drivers 2 days ago, this has yet to happen. If it matters, I use pattern lock.
Haven't found any new bugs yet. Tonight I'll try the new 218 drivers and run a new benchmark.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
with this driver i got a lower benchmark point rate.
Lower gfx score here too. Can't comment on apps yet.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA
here are my results with adreno 220 v218
latest cm9 nightly 20120513
min: 192 max: 1782
2D render enabled
density: 120dpi
What bench program are you guys using???
Remolten said:
What bench program are you guys using???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant, there's a free version at play store
I used AnTuTu.
I already use Antutu just wondering what the one in that post was (quadrant).

Fastest Browser Benchmars? (Post your results)

Hey I have been looking at some benchmarks for various devices and can only find stock tests posted by different sites so post your results here!
Here are my tests results all at stock clock and voltage
Sunspider: 757.3ms (lower is better)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Kraken: 9782.7ms (lower is better)
Octane: 2981 (higher is better)
Update:
Browser: AOSP Browser
Device: Rooted, running AOSP+ JOP40D with kernel included in rom 12/20/12. Stock CPU clock at stock voltages
Update 2:
I also ran these test underclocked @1.4ghz to have a comparison of Exynos 5250 vs A6X cpu in the iPad4 at the same clock speed
SunSpider: 925.9ms @1.4ghz
Kraken: 11589.3ms @1.4ghz
Octane: 2526 @1.4ghz
If we are evaluating different browsers then it might be good to post what browser you are using and whether your device is rooted or not. At a glance from the screenshots it appears to me that you might be using ocean browser and that your Nexus 10 is rooted. Is that correct? Seems to be very good scores by the way.
Sunspider;
Ocean = 757.9ms
Dolphin = 959.6ms
Chrome = 1383.2ms
Everything stock, no root.
Not rooted using Ocean Browser:
Sunspider: 768.4
Kraken: 10062.2
Octane: 2912
JPW1 said:
If we are evaluating different browsers then it might be good to post what browser you are using and whether your device is rooted or not. At a glance from the screenshots it appears to me that you might be using ocean browser and that your Nexus 10 is rooted. Is that correct? Seems to be very good scores by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for pointing that out. OP updated
UCBrower HD:
Octane: 2899
Sun spider: 839.0ms
Kraken: 9991.2ms
Rooted running Stock with KTManta kernel
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda premium
HolyChicken said:
Update 2:
I also ran these test underclocked @1.4ghz to have a comparison of Exynos 5450 vs A6X cpu in the iPad4 at the same clock speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5450? It hasn't released yet lol correct it, iPad4 has better GPU and n10 has better cpu
i9100g user said:
Exynos 5450? It hasn't released yet lol correct it, iPad4 has better GPU and n10 has better cpu
sent from my gs3 GT i 9300
----------------------------------
stock jb 4.1.1 , siyah kernel1.83,dual boot
1st Rom stock jb 4.1.1
2nd Rom cm10 4.1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no need to quote the whole OP. >_>
Running CM 10.1
Sunspider results
Dolphin Beta: 693.2ms
AOSP: 794.6ms
Ocean: 835.7ms
Boat: 837.3ms
Firefox: 972.2ms
Firefox Beta: 993.4ms
Dolphin: 1132.7ms
Chrome: 1354.0ms
I'll try to run the other benchmarks on the above browsers when I get a chance.
I'm rooted and using the KTManta kernel with the stock ROM and my results in sunspider with Dolphin Beta were
Ktoonservative gov @1.7 got me 653ms in my first attempt
Ktoonservative @1.4 got me 782ms in my first attempt
Surface? iPad? Get on our level
Fidelator said:
I'm rooted and using the KTManta kernel with the stock ROM and my results in sunspider with Dolphin Beta were
Ktoonservative gov @1.7 got me 653ms in my first attempt
Ktoonservative @1.4 got me 782ms in my first attempt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not bad at all. Would you mind running the test 3 times and posting your median score? That is what I usually do when bench marking to eliminate possible outliers.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using xda app-developers app
Anybody consider to submit your device's scores into this thread

Categories

Resources