I have the 2.1 siyah kernel and i left it in perfomance govener for a few hours by mistake is it ok too run 1.6ghz for a few hours stright
Actually SGS2 is too fast already and i see no need for OC at all
Anyway, i don't really know about that kernel, but i believe that at 1,6GHz it increases voltage which isn't too good thing and might reduce processors life time.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Unless you make 100% usage at 1.6 ghz for some straight hours, its not going to harm you and your mobile except your battery life
Heat is a cpus worst enemy. Also keep the voltage in mind when ocing. Your phone will only be running at 1.6 under full load so a couple of hours of max activity will get the phone hot and with heat come instability.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I dont know if it was running %100 cpu but it was at 1600mhz the whole time right now everything is ok but it seems to get slightly warm quick and runs 31 celius battrey but that might just be normal
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
31 sounds right
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Related
Would I get better speed if I disabled 1ghz frequency and left 1.2ghz the default Max frequency?
Would it be faster?
Or slower? Or nothing?
Don't like the 1ghz frequency. But I notice my phone is a little slower when disabling. It.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I thought you were making a kernel with 1.9 ghz overclock? That should be fast enough
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Appl
Kidding, correct?
1.2 > 1.0
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
Good to see enyo has found where he belongs in xda. Asking questions and learning.
This is a big improvement enyo.
as to 1.2 feeling slower, your putting a massive undervolt on it. Try backing it off a bit and see if responsiveness comes back. Also, higher clock speeds can lead to better battery in theory by completing tasks faster and allowing the CPU to govern back down to a idle state.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Thanks. Your right. Backed to -75mV on 1.2ghz and faster response came back.
Also it because really fast after switching to the Medium Leakage.
I rarely let my phone sleep, so 1.2 is the maximum I'll go for speed/battery.
But, the more you UV, you get laggy if its too low, but stable?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
droidstyle said:
Honestly -50uv across the board yields the best performance, battery life and reliability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
Is there a advantage if it's undervolted 100+ mV?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So -50mV is just enough?
I'll do that. Your good with setups of oc/uv.
Seems really stable for me.
Trying Low leakage for better battery. But Medium is perfect right
Now.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
droidstyle said:
that would be called overvolting... yes performance may increase, but inturn added heat, less battery life and instability can occur with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just tried your setup. And I didn't know how slow my phone was till I used yours. So undervolting to much does slow down your phone. And it Got hot out of no where.
Thanks
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Who prefers LiveOC over the regular OC system?
Just wondering.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I prefer to use voltage control and overclock the ol' fashioned way lol...I have played with nstools and live oc, but its more than I really need.
110%, 1320 mhz, stock voltages
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
110%, 1320 mhz, stock voltages
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which governor do you use? GlitchOndemand
Glitchass v2
Conservative
Interactive
Powersave
Performance
Lazy
Smoothass
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
i use glitchondemand/ fiops overclocked @ 1500mhz with no undervolt.
Enyo. said:
Which governor do you use? GlitchOndemand
Glitchass v2
Conservative
Interactive
Powersave
Performance
Lazy
Smoothass
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
droidstyle said:
i use glitchondemand/ fiops overclocked @ 1500mhz with no undervolt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No heat?
Is this dangerous? With no overheat, is this dangerous? Are you using this day to day?
Didn't get into oc too much.
neh4pres said:
Stock..
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks so much
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
No heat?
Is this dangerous? With no overheat, is this dangerous?
I've never overclocked this high before. Didn't get into oc too much.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So.. You never tested 1.9 ghz before you released your kang kernel?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
So.. You never tested 1.9 ghz before you released your kang kernel?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tested it.
For a day or two.
But using my phone day to day.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
enyo... I have tested with glitch kernel at 1.7 ghz and i currently hold the record benchmark for this device on antutu using performance governor. After testing for a half hour at that speed i fell asleep with the phone stuck at that speed. I'm typing this message with that phone now. That was done with glitch v13. The most i ever got from high clock speeds was freezes and reboots.
However, if you get stupid with live oc the story can be very different.
But to give an idea of what my phone handled back then, go to the cm7 glitch thread and check what the gpu/buss speed was at 1.7ghz. But remember that those bus/cpu speeds, and voltages were finely tuned by tk , and you probably won't be able to push that hard with live oc.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
enyo... I have tested with glitch kernel at 1.7 ghz and i currently hold the record benchmark for this device on antutu using performance governor. After testing for a half hour at that speed i fell asleep with the phone stuck at that speed. I'm typing this message with that phone now. That was done with glitch v13. The most i ever got from high clock speeds was freezes and reboots.
However, if you get stupid with live oc the story can be very different.
But to give an idea of what my phone handled back then, go to the cm7 glitch thread and check what the gpu/buss speed was at 1.7ghz. But remember that those bus/cpu speeds, and voltages were finely tuned by tk , and you probably won't be able to push that hard with live oc.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So just overclocking, @ 1.5GHz or 1.2GHz and, monitoring the temp, processor will last just as long as it would non overclocked?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Enyo. said:
So just overclocking, @ 1.5GHz or 1.2GHz and, monitoring the temp, processor will last just as long as it would non overclocked?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's all luck. Chance. Fate. If tk has not burned his phone yet i would say you have a lot of catching up to do to get the mileage he has. I had mine overclocked 1.5ghz for a few months.. And guess what, i have never monitored temp. But hey, i pay an extra couple dollars a month on top of insurance for lifetime warrantee. So i think my phone burning up would fall under that. But anyway, your stressing out to much over it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
neh4pres said:
It's all luck. Chance. Fate. If tk has not burned his phone yet i would say you have a lot of catching up to do to get the mileage he has. I had mine overclocked 1.5ghz for a few months.. And guess what, i have never monitored temp. But hey, i pay an extra couple dollars a month on top of insurance for lifetime warrantee. So i think my phone burning up would fall under that. But anyway, your stressing out to much over it.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much.
Going to over clock to 1.5, not going to stress about it. Ulcers come like that
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
no heat and i use it daily...first time i can ever say this when overclocking to 1500. i agree with neh4pres posts...becareful with live oc it can screw your device up quick. most folks will never see any benifit by using live oc imo anyway. part of the reason why i just use vc...
I actually use 10% live oc and 1200mhz step... All voltages stock. Fully stable and it FLIES
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
I must have every bit of speed. That said here's the setup:
ICS AKOP 25 Glitch 14 B5 for 6.0
1200 step with 118 LOC
Glitch OnDemand with some OV and UV. (see pics)
Live OC is the way to go as you get a boost to your GPU and RAM in addition to the usual CPU bump.
thisguy23 said:
I must have every bit of speed. That said here's the setup:
ICS AKOP 25 Glitch 14 B5 for 6.0
1200 step with 118 LOC
Glitch OnDemand with some OV and UV. (see pics)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thx a bunch for this nfo. just used ur voltage settings for my device and was able to overclock into the 1300mhz range from the 1200 step. im impressed since last time it was very unstable at 1200 for me.
thx.
swagooo said:
thx a bunch for this nfo. just used ur voltage settings for my device and was able to overclock into the 1300mhz range from the 1200 step. im impressed since last time it was very unstable at 1200 for me.
thx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with the devil kernel i have been running 102% loc between 200-1000mhz. on glitch i can oc up to 1500mhz with no loc, soon as i add any loc the device freezes. im guessing my leakage is not dialed in correctly for glitch, also i get a bit nervous playing wit arm voltages.
droidstyle said:
with the devil kernel i have been running 102% loc between 200-1000mhz. on glitch i can oc up to 1500mhz with no loc, soon as i add any loc the device freezes. im guessing my leakage is not dialed in correctly for glitch, also i get a bit nervous playing wit arm voltages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try these i have not had a reboot in over a week
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
So I got my s3 running stable at 1.7 I have noticed the temp went into the 80c range few times but I'm guessing a phone of this tech has built in throttling safe guards?
So is it safe to leave it like this for the rest of its life now. Anyone else keep their phone overclocked for day to day usage?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
thermal safeguards in place from what I've read.
the life of your device might be shortened but hey should last 2 years at least .
me personally 1.2ghz I like having a battery last for ages.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
i overclock my phone to 1600 - 200 and i dont know what was happening because i sleep at 4am and wake up at 12pm boom! my battery becomes 30%
can someone help me with the exact ratio of your undervolt? and i will make it to my phone because i dont know how to apply undervolting in my galaxy s3 Help!!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
I underboltedbusing stweaks and uv -50 on all frequencies and tested yesterday and got 22hrs and battery was still 24% and was squire heavy use
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
hey man can you teach me how to undervolt ? because my battery drains fast
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
All I did was use stweaks (I have Siyah kernel) and in Undervolt section just set to -50. Job done.
Tried -25 first and hat was fine so tried -50, then -75 but that was unstable so went back to -50.
Then ran stability test for 10 mins which it passed so kept setting and used better battery stats to track battery usage
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Alright what governor r u guys using? I'm using smartass2 and although I het excellent batt life when screen is off, it is a bit choppy and not as smooth as I would like.and it drains fairly fast when screen is on or plating angry birds for like 5 mins. I'm looking for something that's a good balance between smoothness and most importantly battery.
any ideas?
Try intellidemand. I have had good luck with it
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
pagodasrevenge said:
Try intellidemand. I have had good luck with it
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just switched to it.... whats ur battery and screen time?
Ive been using intellidemand.. works great when I want it to work like ondemand.. but scales up slower when I need it to I.e. text, email.. but playing games and surfing web it scales up faster like on-demand..
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
famouscollin said:
Ive been using intellidemand.. works great when I want it to work like ondemand.. but scales up slower when I need it to I.e. text, email.. but playing games and surfing web it scales up faster like on-demand..
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you set any special permaiters or anything? whats ur batt stats?
I use Wheatley. I usually get about 2h 15m to 2h 30m of screen time with the stock battery. No special tweaking to the parameters or anything either, just set it and you're good to go.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
Quadrider10 said:
just switched to it.... whats ur battery and screen time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was today with lots of texting and some youtube and ESPN.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I usually get 15 hours or so with 1:45-2 hoes screen time at best. This is on chingys 1.2 with global firmware and radios.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
SteveG12543 said:
I use Wheatley. I usually get about 2h 15m to 2h 30m of screen time with the stock battery. No special tweaking to the parameters or anything either, just set it and you're good to go.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA Premium.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive used lionheart, and it drained the batter SO fast. ima give wheatly a try on monday and intidemand tomorrow. compare the 2 results i guess lol
Battery stats on intellidemand are ok.. I'm a heavy user tho I use another OEM battery and an external charger and switch out thru the day.. I get about 1.5-2.0 hrs of screen time in about a 9-12hr period depending on what I'm doing.. sometimes I'll wake up and drain it dead in an hour and a half (dl, surfing, forums, texts few calls) I'm undervolted -50mv across the board. And set at 1.56ghz on viperrez using dsbs kernel..
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
famouscollin said:
Battery stats on intellidemand are ok.. I'm a heavy user tho I use another OEM battery and an external charger and switch out thru the day.. I get about 1.5-2.0 hrs of screen time in about a 9-12hr period depending on what I'm doing.. sometimes I'll wake up and drain it dead in an hour and a half (dl, surfing, forums, texts few calls) I'm undervolted -50mv across the board. And set at 1.56ghz on viperrez using dsbs kernel..
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn.... lol ima try wheatly and see how it is.... maybe ill switch to One xxxx rom
Going to ask the noob question, how do I get more governors?
A2Aegis said:
Going to ask the noob question, how do I get more governors?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flash a kernel that has them. DSB is the one that i know of that has a lot of them.
now what govoner takes FULL advantage of both cores and focus sololy on preformace one that i can use for hardcore gaming
Quadrider10 said:
now what govoner takes FULL advantage of both cores and focus sololy on preformace one that i can use for hardcore gaming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's called performance...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
pagodasrevenge said:
It's called performance...
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no. preformace hasent turned on the 2nd core for me, also since it runs at max frequency all the time, and dosent scale down, unnessarly heat and ussage from the cpu builds up and cooks it. should only be uses for benchmarking IMO
Next noobish question. It's easy to find it in AOSP, but I can't find the governors in Sense ROMs. I'm currently using ViperRez.
Smartassv2 on ziggy kernel. Went about 15+ hrs with 2+ screen on hrs OC'd @ 1.8. I also tethered ALOT during the screen off period and ran multiple benchmarks. Stock battery
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Quadrider10 said:
no. preformace hasent turned on the 2nd core for me, also since it runs at max frequency all the time, and dosent scale down, unnessarly heat and ussage from the cpu builds up and cooks it. should only be uses for benchmarking IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're using DSB's kernel (I am), his latest has pegasusq governor on it. It seems to turn on the 2nd core more often. I use system tuner pro and CPU Usage Monitor. CPU usage monitor allows you to put icons on the notification bar showing CPU speed AND cpu utilization for both cores. So you can see whats going on. Also system tuner allows you to 'force' the second core on. You can do this with Ondemand with good results. IMO
topgun1953 said:
If you're using DSB's kernel (I am), his latest has pegasusq governor on it. It seems to turn on the 2nd core more often. I use system tuner pro and CPU Usage Monitor. CPU usage monitor allows you to put icons on the notification bar showing CPU speed AND cpu utilization for both cores. Also system tuner allows you to 'force' the second core on. You can do this with Ondemand with good results. IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it hasent work with me.... every time i force all cores online, the 2nd one still just shuts off auto mtcicallly. i just gavce up on that, but yea im thinking pegasusq will be best shot. or interactice for both gaming.