From coolya's google+,
I am sorry to say, but I won't put any work in ICS on the Galaxy Ace. I have tried some proof of concept stuff but it isn't worth the work.
I don't say that is will be impossible but, it will be pain to get everything working, especially camera and openGL. Since there is no sign of a official release from samsung this is way to much work.
Also the the UX won't be what I will call good, the device has to less ram.
But stay tunes from nice changes to the gingerbread release for that, there will definitively be a "official" release for it.
There will still be a official gingerbeard version of cyanogenmod.
This info is already shared by SuperAce609.
Sent from Galaxy Ace GT-S5830 using Grif's Cyanogenmod & allinone ram script.
Dont jus say thanks, use d 'THANKS' button. [XDA RULE]
Who cares officiall or unofficiall
because of officiall news like we did it lol officiall coming to town thread grif07 stop supporting his rom and still no sign of officiall
thanks axell2033 he working now for cm unofficiall
nims11 said:
Who cares officiall or unofficiall
because of officiall news like we did it lol officiall coming to town thread grif07 stop supporting his rom and still no sign of officiall
thanks axell2033 he working now for cm unofficiall
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if he is using the armv5 cyanogen tree to build?
Sent from a phone with an app.
link or it didn't happen.
I'll clean up his ass for him
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
EmoBoiix3 said:
I'll clean up his ass for him
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There should be a like button on xda, instead of thanks.
sdotmouse said:
Do you know if he is using the armv5 cyanogen tree to build?
Sent from a phone with an app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cooper has 2 ways of being built , one being Armv6-vfp , the other being Armv5te-vfp
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Am I weird??
Is it really that bad? I mean, yes, it'd be nice to have the latest android version, but not at any price (not working camera? C'mon!). I'd rather have a good and polished phone with android 2.3 than a buggy and resource-hungry 4.0.
I'm pretty much content with my phone right now, but I think there's still room for improvements: we desperately need a better battery management; we still suffer from _huge_ lags. And what about Wifi?? We deserve a reliable wireless connection (for god sake, somebody fix the wpa_supplicant already so I can connect to my University's network!! )
I know many of you won't share my opinion, but I can't be the only one who thinks this way
alexnm said:
Is it really that bad? I mean, yes, it'd be nice to have the latest android version, but not at any price (not working camera? C'mon!). I'd rather have a good and polished phone with android 2.3 than a buggy and resource-hungry 4.0.
I'm pretty much content with my phone right now, but I think there's still room for improvements: we desperately need a better battery management; we still suffer from _huge_ lags. And what about Wifi?? We deserve a reliable wireless connection (for god sake, somebody fix the wpa_supplicant already so I can connect to my University's network!! )
I know many of you won't share my opinion, but I can't be the only one who thinks this way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well , it's either performance or eye-candy
alexnm said:
Is it really that bad? I mean, yes, it'd be nice to have the latest android version, but not at any price (not working camera? C'mon!). I'd rather have a good and polished phone with android 2.3 than a buggy and resource-hungry 4.0.
I'm pretty much content with my phone right now, but I think there's still room for improvements: we desperately need a better battery management; we still suffer from _huge_ lags. And what about Wifi?? We deserve a reliable wireless connection (for god sake, somebody fix the wpa_supplicant already so I can connect to my University's network!! )
I know many of you won't share my opinion, but I can't be the only one who thinks this way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with every word you said(or wrote).
at least we will get an official version and that's the juice. We have to be aware that ACE is not a top performance phone and what's all that hype with ICS anyway? If we'll get an official gingerbread/cyanogenmod rom I bet all of us we'll be happy.
So any news of the official release timeline? Think is going to be after Christmas/New Year or we'll get it as a holiday present?
Speculation Threads.... Sigh
itasoulas said:
At least we will get an official version and that's the juice. We have to be aware that ACE is not a top performance phone and what's all that hype with ICS anyway? If we'll get an official gingerbread/cyanogenmod rom I bet all of us we'll be happy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to admit, but most of the ICS features wouldn't work on the Ace anyway, for example, Android Beam (No NFC on Ace), Face Unlock (No front facing camera)
However, I have heard that ICS uses less system resources, and a source at Google told me...
"Any device that runs Gingerbread is more than likely to ported over to ICS and will function just as fast"
NathanBookham said:
I have to admit, but most of the ICS features wouldn't work on the Ace anyway, for example, Android Beam (No NFC on Ace), Face Unlock (No front facing camera)
However, I have heard that ICS uses less system resources, and a source at Google told me...
"Any device that runs Gingerbread is more than likely to ported over to ICS and will function just as fast"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right but the truth is that samsung is not gonna do it.So it is difficult for devs.
doctorace92 said:
Right but the truth is that samsung is not gonna do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe samsung wont port ICS, bt d devs mite port it.
Sent from Galaxy Ace GT-S5830 using Grif's Cyanogenmod & allinone ram script.
Dont jus say thanks, use d 'THANKS' button. [XDA RULE]
EmoBoiix3 said:
Cooper has 2 ways of being built , one being Armv6-vfp , the other being Armv5te-vfp
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I asked because as far as I was aware support for armv6 was being dropped.
Sent from a phone with an app.
Related
Hi there guys,
I just read about Android 4.0,released today. As I promised from june,I wil try to port it to you guys (even because I'm not working at any project now).
The first alpha will be available in few days (if all goes well),maybe one week. I already got the SDK dump,so i could try to make it boot,but I prefer using sources. BTW,when CyanogenMod 9 will be released(CM8 is some crappy Honeycomb),I'll make CM9 port.
EDIT: I can't make the SDK boot. Libs are built from ARMv7,but we're ARMv6. So wait for sources to be released.
SOME INFOS:
ROM will be based on .32 kernel tree,then I'll switch to .35
Nothing in mind now.
Current status: Planning to download sources. I need to ask some help too,because I don't know for good this AOSP stuff. Will probably ask to lupohirp
ciaox said:
Hi there guys,
I just read about Android 4.0,released today. As I promised from june,I wil try to port it to you guys (even because I'm not working at any project now.
The first alpha will be available in few days (if all goes well),maybe one week. I already got the SDK dump,so i could try to make it boot,but I prefer using sources. BTW,when CyanogenMod 8 will be released,I'll make CM8 port.
SOME INFOS:
ROM will be based on .32 kernel tree,then I'll switch to .35
Nothing in mind now.
Current status: Planning to download sources. I need to ask some help too,because I don't know for good this AOSP stuff. Will probably ask to lupohirp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all d very best mate!!!hope u succeed in the first try itself
if you need help ciaox i'm in! i'm installing ubuntu 11.10 right now!
lupohirp said:
if you need help ciaox i'm in! i'm installing ubuntu 11.10 right now!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I LOVE OCTOBER THIS YEAR (Ubuntu,ICS,but Steve Jobs death. Kinda sad isn't it?)
ciaox said:
I LOVE OCTOBER THIS YEAR (Ubuntu,ICS,but Steve Jobs death. Kinda sad isn't it?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a little of topic
it's also sad denis ritchie death is not mentioned as much as job's death
Let the ics battle begin!!!
Ding ding ding! Correction! Its CyanogenMod 9 not 8... CM8 is a corrupted Honeycomb...
Sent from my Nexus One using MIUI 1.10.14 AND IT LOOKS LIKE ICS
well waiting for ur rom
hope you get it before sweattaiami does
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
mDroidd said:
hope you get it before sweattaiami does
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking of reporting it,but I don't know. He/She litterally took my project.
BTW,sources out in end of october,and first days of november. So now working on making closed source rom boot,because I can't wait to see how ICS looks on LG P500. Will post a video soon,currently doing other stuff not related to this.
ciaox said:
I'm thinking of reporting it,but I don't know. He/She litterally took my project.
BTW,sources out in end of october,and first days of november. So now working on making closed source rom boot,because I can't wait to see how ICS looks on LG P500. Will post a video soon,currently doing other stuff not related to this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will looks horrible becuz is too small to our screens?!
Sent from my Nexus One using MIUI 1.10.14 AND IT LOOKS LIKE ICS
Ah well ciaox,
just ignore SWEATTAIMI, nothing usefull came from there, just crap threads and posts, just don't understand why some noobs call him/her their hero .
Reported several times, requested to remove those useless threads, but still no reaction.
Anyway, good luck on your project
DaxElectro said:
It will looks horrible becuz is too small to our screens?!
Sent from my Nexus One using MIUI 1.10.14 AND IT LOOKS LIKE ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it wont!! It has been made up for all devices... not just hdpi... it has compatibility with our mdpi resolution... i checked the framework in the system dump to confirm... it has mdpi support...
BTW dax, you could create a themed rom of ICS?? you have the framework now... plus a few leaked appz...
Sorry for off topic..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Rockr172 said:
No it wont!! It has been made up for all devices... not just hdpi... it has compatibility with our mdpi resolution... i checked the framework in the system dump to confirm... it has mdpi support...
BTW dax, you could create a themed rom of ICS?? you have the framework now... plus a few leaked appz...
Sorry for off topic..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right!!!also he has something in framework/systemUI code that can fit UI in all screen (also qvga) so we will haven't bad icons or something like that
_Arjen_ said:
Ah well ciaox,
just ignore SWEATTAIMI, nothing usefull came from there, just crap threads and posts, just don't understand why some noobs call him/her their hero .
Reported several times, requested to remove those useless threads, but still no reaction.
Anyway, good luck on your project
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Took the words outta my mouth..
Rockr172 said:
No it wont!! It has been made up for all devices... not just hdpi... it has compatibility with our mdpi resolution... i checked the framework in the system dump to confirm... it has mdpi support...
BTW dax, you could create a themed rom of ICS?? you have the framework now... plus a few leaked appz...
Sorry for off topic..
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im planning that for gbs rom update next week...
Sent from my Nexus One using MIUI 1.10.14 AND IT LOOKS LIKE ICS
_Arjen_ said:
Ah well ciaox,
just ignore SWEATTAIMI, nothing usefull came from there, just crap threads and posts, just don't understand why some noobs call him/her their hero .
Reported several times, requested to remove those useless threads, but still no reaction.
Anyway, good luck on your project
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, agree and agree with all this
Good luck ciaox
Enviado desde mi LG-P500
Great News!
a big project ciaox! any help or test that you will need to do, count me... i've the sdk system.img decompiled... if i can help you with something... please tell me...
DaxElectro said:
It will looks horrible becuz is too small to our screens?!
Sent from my Nexus One using MIUI 1.10.14 AND IT LOOKS LIKE ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? ICS is for tablets as well as phones. I don't see any reason for it to look bad because of a small screen size.
I've been playing around with ICS in the emulator, and I've been wondering what the advantages will be for us over Gingerbread.
The UI overhaul seems nice enough, though ICS seems to be designed for devices with no hardware menu button. In the native apps included, there is a bar at the bottom which has buttons that were normally hidden and accessed by the menu button.
This basically means we'll be losing screen space in ICS, unless this bar can be hidden for devices that do have a dedicated menu button, though I couldn't find the option in the emulator.
The ram usage is more than double that of Gingerbread (45MB vs 98MB). Luckily our O1 phones will be able to manage this fine (mine is currently using 159MB, with 243MB free) but for other phones the upgrade is going to render them useless.
The big problem is going to be the sheer size of ICS. In the Gingerbread emulator the system.img is 89MB but for ICS it is 167MB. Which is of course the bare minimum for the emulator, 'real' Android with Gapps etc is bigger. CM7.1 takes up 154MB of the 190MB /system partition on my phone. To get ICS on our O1 we'll probably have to do some partition resizing, which means a smaller /data partition for our installed apps.
adfad666 said:
I've been playing around with ICS in the emulator, and I've been wondering what the advantages will be for us over Gingerbread.
The UI overhaul seems nice enough, though ICS seems to be designed for devices with no hardware menu button. In the native apps included, there is a bar at the bottom which has buttons that were normally hidden and accessed by the menu button.
This basically means we'll be losing screen space in ICS, unless this bar can be hidden for devices that do have a dedicated menu button, though I couldn't find the option in the emulator.
The ram usage is more than double that of Gingerbread (45MB vs 98MB). Luckily our O1 phones will be able to manage this fine (mine is currently using 159MB, with 243MB free) but for other phones the upgrade is going to render them useless.
The big problem is going to be the sheer size of ICS. In the Gingerbread emulator the system.img is 89MB but for ICS it is 167MB. Which is of course the bare minimum for the emulator, 'real' Android with Gapps etc is bigger. CM7.1 takes up 154MB of the 190MB /system partition on my phone. To get ICS on our O1 we'll probably have to do some partition resizing, which means a smaller /data partition for our installed apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh well, we'll have to wait and see how CM team is gonna handle the buttons on the screen.
Sent from my LG-P500
Kolja Dummann - 5:51 PM - Mobile - Public
Maybe some people are wondering why I am not dot writing about Android related stuff in the last weeks / month.
Well I am pretty exausted, I moved cities at th end of the last year, started a new job and all this right at the time where ICS droped. But a long time before that Android wasn`t really fun to me, the demand was insane, many of my non Android posts got hijackt, a bunch of mails, comments, what ever spamed my private life.
I will continue my break on Android at least till easter hollidays.
Now some of you might want to know whats happening with the stuff I worked on, especially the Galaxy Ace owners, don`t expect anything, currently all my Android stuff is canceled and I don`t know if I will continue on them in the future.
Please don`t ask about them, because I can`t answer those questions.
This is actually quite sad. Especially since cooper is already in the CM7.2 changelog.
As expected
Sent from your phone
Well, i think our developers are already doing a great job. Official cm7 would have been just another thing to play with, but i don't think we need it. Keep on this way guys, you make our phone better and better every day.
Sent from my Galaxy Ace on Ice Cream Sunday Final
He's notorious for giving up halfway anyway .
Herpderp Defy.
EmoBoiix3 said:
He's notorious for giving up halfway anyway .
Herpderp Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just fire him and ask ne developers ?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
spacecaker said:
just fire him and ask ne developers ?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol we can't
Herpderp Defy.
Who knew! *sarcasm*
Sent from the Nokia Galaxy Nexus Arc 5530 Live with Walkman S2 XL XE S X 3G CDMA LTE T-mo PSN Certified Plus with Beats Audio
Oh.....kolja we are all surprised!!! You gave up damn, we always thought you could do it *sarcasm intended* -_-
To kolja, good work mate, good work..first you gave up cm9...then you are taking nearly a year for ONE cm..we didn't get a SINGLE nightly...i had like to say thank you for making us some stupid lowlifes who thought we would get official cm someday...thank you very much...
Sent from my SamsungGalaxyAce with my hands,take it or leave it
I'm not surprise with this
i had been following XDA forum from some months now...n rite from day one there was so much hype about official CM.
I was very happy with the unofficial CM development by our developers on XDA forum.
More over now unofficial CM 9 is expected soon.
With so much of development on XDA forum ,i guess 'Official CM' has just became a word and nothing more...
and finally its good to know that there won't be official CM bcz it was moreover turning out to be one sided love affair (like complicated relationship status).
I'm not surprise, i read on many forum and blog, also websites about the news in official cm...all said within a week, but that few months ago...
Accept it guys, no official cm for ace
regards,
•ƒγяύs ργяσ™• eBuddy XMS pin: A24D43B9
[post from public phone, near public toilet]
I dont care Like other people said some xda developerz are always working to our Ace.So for me,itz so irrelevant the cm7 oficial....
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Screw this ****. The CM7 by our developers are already awesome. No need for an official CM7.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Ooh thats sad
TheHeartHacker said:
Ooh thats sad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry but it is not sad. There are several ROM's here that would be official if they were made by the "right" people. Unofficial kinda sounds better too
Even if in the the end he gave up, u guys should know that all cm7.x here using his early stage code/patch as reference/base. Eventho its sad that he gave up, he do contribute alot to make all the unofficial cm7.x here happen. Credit does goes to him one way or another
Sent from your phone
Oh well
Herpderp Defy.
I use grif's cm for months now, despite some bugs, it's a every day use. And by now we are getting ics too, as everyone said we do have some good developers here
It was a surprise to me, probably due to the fact I'm a noob to the community.
I was looking forward to seeing if the official would be faster and bug free compared the the unofficial cooper-kang 7.1 rom I was using. It started off good, but in search for a stable oc'ing kernal, something went wrong. Apps would force close and the occassional restart would take place....occassionaly as in a minimum of twice a day.
I installed 7.2 by FrozenAceTeam a few days ago with Ketut's Blackhawk kernal and aside from the battery drain I havn't noticed any bugs. Some larger games actuall install now, like Virtual City Playground. I would get 'insufficient memory' errors with cooper-kang's, even though I would have roughly 100Mb of internal storage free. The battery drain isn't that different compared to cooper-kang anyway, although I used to get double the time on the official rom that came with the phone.
Long story short...I'm surprised, but not saddened by the news. FrozenAceTeam have saved me.
Hey guys!
Yesterday I read an article about "CyanogenMod no longer delivers support for devices with snapdragons 1"
And as our device is a "cooper one", it seems we are not gonna make it..
Source 1: "CyanogenMod ya no entregará soporte para equipos con Snapdragon S1" - bitly.com/MCS7bU
Source 2: "CyanogenMod formally confirms ceased support for Snapdragon S1 devices past Gingerbread" - bitly.com/MCSGT5
And here is the official post of Cyanogenmod's Team (from Google+):
CyanogenMod 01/08/2012
CM 9+, N1 (and other S1 SoC)
The Nexus One, along with the other first generation Snapdragon devices (devices with the QSD8x50, MSM7x25, MSM7x27 and MSM7x27T SoCs), will not be supported beyond the CM 7.x (Gingerbread) branch.
We’ve been holding off on finalizing this, looking for ways that we could make this work and be happy with the release. Sadly, it never panned out, and we’ve decided that it’s time to stop our efforts.
The Nexus One in particular would have required a custom hboot to repartition the internal memory (which itself was limited to 512 MB, like most devices of that generation) and the proprietary libs available (from 2.3) would have required compromises in the CyanogenMod code that we are not willing to make. The wide variety of MSM7x2x(T) devices, on top of these problems, also have a complete lack of media libraries that are compatible with the new APIs introduced in ICS (video decoding and encoding, specifically). The pieces just aren’t there.
Does the capability to run ICS or Jellybean exist on these devices? Yes, with enough time, effort, and hacks it can be made to work. Do we feel the experience is worth all of that? No.
To measure our releases, we use the same subjective criteria as users do: “speed”, “jank”, “butter”, but also factor in user experience (UX) and other intangibles. However, beyond this is something that we can (and do) use as a ‘pass or fail’ mechanism, the Android Compatibility Test Suite. The CTS is used by device manufacturers to ensure that their changes to Android source do not break Android API, platform and other standards. This, in turn, brings stability to the Play Store for app developers. Breaking CTS would lead to a bad and inconsistent experience for app devs, which in turn would lead to a bad experience for you guys as users. If CyanogenMod was perceived to be blatantly violating CTS, developers could eventually blacklist CyanogenMod users from using their apps (or worse, Google could blacklist CyanogenMod from the Play Store altogether). No one would win by going down that path.
If, in the future, a solution is found that passes CTS, we will revisit the topic.
For users that are adamant about trying to run ICS and beyond, options exist. We are not going to recommend other builds however, as they are more than likely breaking CTS, and therefore our quality assurance standards as well. You can find them if you look in the usual places.
-The CyanogenMod Team
Edit The list of affected devices are as follows: blade, bravo, bravoc, buzz, c660, click, cooper, desirec, e510, e720, es209ra, espresso, hero, heroc, inc, legend, liberty, morrisson, motus, one, p500, passion, robym, s5670, supersonic, tass, u8150, u8220, z71, zero
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source: bitly.com/MCSZxf
So... What do you think ?...
Damnit...
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
How bout this? That is ICS
Shadow xD said:
How bout this? That is ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means future support, that means future updates will take longer because now porting is needed to make it work.
The title is wrong.
You should say we won't get future support from Cyanogenmod.
AOSP still can be compile from source I guess.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
galaxyace152 said:
The title is wrong.
You should say we won't get future support from Cyanogenmod.
AOSP still can be compile from source I guess.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can I edit it ?....
EDIT>Go Advanced. Be more careful next time.
eagleeyetom said:
EDIT>Go Advanced. Be more careful next time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, understood =/..
¬¬
We never had and never will have OFFICIAL CM9+ support. UNOFFICIAL builds are what we'll have to live on..
Is this just saying that we wont have official CM9/CM10 support (which we all knew)?
Or is it saying that we will no longer get support from them for CM7?
Sent from the cracked screen of my GALAXY Ace.
tomb20 said:
Is this just saying that we wont have official CM9/CM10 support (which we all knew)?
Or is it saying that we will no longer get support from them for CM7?
Sent from the cracked screen of my GALAXY Ace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think CM 7.2 cooper is the last rom they do for Gingerbread.....
I mean... No more Official Roms for Galaxy Ace
JuampyXnaker said:
I think CM 7.2 cooper is the last rom they do for Gingerbread.....
I mean... No more Official Roms for Galaxy Ace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We will get GB roms.
We just won't get official CM9/10 and support from them for the above.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Yup.. CM7.x is after which the support ends.
Cm7.3 ?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
CoolCatGetHome said:
Cm7.3 ?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They've moved on from CM7, lol
King ACE said:
They've moved on from CM7, lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope they are further developing cm7 for the devices wich dont get official cm9/cm10 support
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
CoolCatGetHome said:
Nope they are further developing cm7 for the devices wich dont get official cm9/cm10 support
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be awesome as Gingerbread is best for the Ace.
ICS slows it down like hell!
galaxyace152 said:
That will be awesome as Gingerbread is best for the Ace.
ICS slows it down like hell!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree, ICS+ was made for better devices than the ace.
Gingerbread works better for the ace.
tomb20 said:
Gingerbread works better for the ace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and aosp GB works hell smoother.. even at this moment cm7 lags in front of aosp :silly::laugh:
cm7 may not see cm7.3 but it is alive for patches to existing system not further features
madman said:
and aosp GB works hell smoother.. even at this moment cm7 lags in front of aosp :silly::laugh:
cm7 may not see cm7.3 but it is alive for patches to existing system not further features
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah! I saw the quadrant for AOSP in Ace! It was some 2100 or something!
Okay, here I'm. I'm new to xda & this is my 1st post. We all know that our s5830 has already tasted Jelly Bean via cyanogenmod/aokp/aosp with bugs in it Of course, those developments are great but not stable It's been a dream of every user to have Jelly Bean for daily use on their ace. Maclaw started it all up first but unfortunately he's off now So the thing is development of JB for our ace on stock base or something like that but stable, bug free & fast Any dev for ace can take it as an interest/challenge & make it possible... I know it's easier said than done but yes, it has always been a dream. Additionally it would be just great if its made to look close to the stock JB by google... So here we go...
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
....?
you DO know how to google?? We already have a "working" CM10 (i use it for daily use. its laggy as faq if you open something, but everything besides camcorder is working)
use this or the "light" or whatever builds. afaik they all "look like stock"
and Ace will never have a "Stock-JB". a "selfmade-stock" is...u know...
CJCord said:
....?
you DO know how to google?? We already have a "working" CM10 (i use it for daily use. its laggy as faq if you open something, but everything besides camcorder is working)
use this or the "light" or whatever builds. afaik they all "look like stock"
and Ace will never have a "Stock-JB". a "selfmade-stock" is...u know...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already know that there can't be any stock jb for ace The jb rom stated by you, I already have it but I want a rom with all working features. You might have seen the screenies of galaxy nexus jb, they look just awesome ! What I meant to say is a developed rom that looks like an official update & has all the working features without lag... ! I know it's hard doing it but not impossible !
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
JB was never meant to run on our -say it how it is- sh!tty hardware. if you mean something that looks like an official SAMSUNG update, i think there is sth. like that already here.
@performance: i think there is a little room for optimization, but it will never run like on the latest NEXUS or Galaxy S
Agreed. Our phone hardware is a serious let down. Gonna buy a Nexus 4 this dec. . So desperate to have it in hands, I can barely wait ! And hey, in the meanwhile maclaw is back on deving. He's left xda & never returning but deving @ maclaw.pl ; hopefully he has the potential to bring something like what I spoke Just hope it comes true...
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Hello mates !
I've been trying roms for my galaxy s2 for like 2 weeks now, but I have never found a bug free, or at least a non-annoying buged rom
Some roms have this "low fps" or I guess they call it the ink effect ? when you wake your phone the screen gets back to it's brightness in a laggy way
Some roms rest the sound, for exemple I'm playing a game and I trun media volume all the way down, if I press home botton, and then get back the the game, the media sounds gets back all the way up
Most of the stock based roms drains battery and RAM ( whenever I press the kill all botton in the task manager, it tells me that 24 apps were closed)
So please if you know any rom that has non of these bugs, please tell me because I'm fed up
thank you
there is no rom that is totally bug free, you will have to experiment till you find one that you can live with.
By the way it is against the rules to ask this type of question, next time read the first sticky on this forum.
Dumb****s, dumb****s everywhere...
Sent from my tomato using xda premium
On my galaxy S , the cm10 was bug free, but I was confused giving that the S2 is more popular, I didn't expect to find these bugs :/
@krayndr : how about I **** your mom ? =D
foued1994 said:
On my galaxy S , the cm10 was bug free, but I was confused giving that the S2 is more popular, I didn't expect to find these bugs :/
@krayndr : how about I **** your mom ? =D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck with that you twat =D
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
foued1994 said:
On my galaxy S , the cm10 was bug free, but I was confused giving that the S2 is more popular, I didn't expect to find these bugs :/
@krayndr : how about I **** your mom ? =D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no such things as bug free roms. Even stock roms have bugs. Thats why they update the softwares frequently. Most stock modified ICS roms and AOKP JB roms are near perfect.
Get a room you two
krayndr said:
Dumb****s, dumb****s everywhere...
Sent from my tomato using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
foued1994 said:
On my galaxy S , the cm10 was bug free, but I was confused giving that the S2 is more popular, I didn't expect to find these bugs :/
@krayndr : how about I **** your mom ? =D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His incompetence is too big for any cheap ass motel
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Devs want the source files for Exynos powered devices to use the System on chip more efficiently thats why Qualcomm or TI processors of samsung phones gets support sooner
I9100: (exynos4, same hardware as i9100g) buggy jellybean, closed source and incompatible audio, no butter, no tvout, bugs which will never be solved.
codeworkx
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=31873214&postcount=7773
Best rom threads are a no no. because it's all subjective. What might be the best rom for one person sucks for another. Only way to find out is to try them all and find which is best for you and your needs
Thread closed