Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
msjohnson2868 said:
Ok, so I think that benchmarks don't mean all that much, but thought I'd post here to get a bit more understanding.
Just ran this AnTuTu benchmark test and thought it compared well with other devices out there so far, in particular the Galaxy Nexus. Being that the REZOUND only has a temp root and is still on Gingerbread, is this not a good sign that this device is going to scream when we see S-off and full ICS roms?
Is AnTuTu even a credible Benchmark test? I have heard that "friends don't let friends run Quadrant" but am not sure if this one is any better.
Thanks in advance for your input.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well im usually scoring around 5700's . them 3 phones are so close its craziness. I think once we get S-off this device will be MUCH better. If we ever even get S-off.
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
I guess what I'm wondering is that according to this benchmark, the stock, Sensed Rezound is really close to the Nexus, which is stock Android, and hardware optimized. Once we get s-off and ICS it seems it will be the fastest thing around.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
AtLemacks said:
Completely unreliable. More for fun that anything man. Not to mention if you went from a Class 4 to a Class 10 SD card you would score significantly higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about the sd card...but it is fun anyway.
It seems that there is at least some reliability to this though...even if it is subjective. I'm curious to see what the improvement will be once the software on the REZOUND is the same as the Nexus.
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
AtLemacks said:
Again, you are going off an unreliable set of tests. Most of them mean nothing in the real world.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any test that is reliable?
Sent from HTC REZOUND using Tapatalk
I prefer Quadrant, I score typically 2200-2500. Cannot wait for s-off so I can debloat this thing.
No, and everyone has their favorites. If you are only using it for ****s and giggles just use the one you like the most.
5485 Antutu here!
Did a temp root and tricked out the SD card speed. 25MB/s read speed, 6.3 MB/s Write speed.
Hey all, I scored a 5831 on Antutu. (posted on their system under 'thatsricci' as well)
I just added a PNY class10 SD card 32GB and it scored 9.0mb/s write and 15.3MB/s READ. I think that's pretty acceptable! Definitely helped the score a bit.
RAM: 891
CPU I: 1948
CPU FP: 861
2D: 274
3D: 1254
DIO: 360
SD Write:90
SD Read: 153
CPU Freq: 1512MHz
Total: 5831
Related
Now I know benchmarks are not that accurate but I figured I would ask about this anyway and see what everyone else thinks...
First, whenever I run linpack I only score anywhere between 12 and 16 overclocked @ 1.8...even my og Evo got about 40 so just wanted some input on that...
And second, when I run quadrant the first 12 tests go real slow but them I seem to still score from 2500-3000 but when I looked at the system info it said my phone was only a single core...kinda thought it was strange...here's the screen shot so you can see what I'm talking about
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just a couple questions I had but not really urgent...still, any input is much appreciated
Sent from my MIUI'd 3VO (Finally switched)
I am guessing that you have the CPU overclocked too much and it is choking on the benchmarks. Try lowering your clock to 1500 and see if you get the same results.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
htc phones have always fallen short on benchmarks dont worry it doesnt rlly say anything about real life performance. yeh it says one core you have 2 is it using both for the test? the world may never know
Yea looks like it isn't picking up second core for testing, hut the second core shouldn't be on all the time anyways, look for a dual core supported benchmark,
I believe cf bench is good for dual core,
And yea linpack borks when oc to far,
~Shot from my shooter in 3D~
~injected with cleanrom~
not to hijack the thread, but i didn't want to start a new post, and can't post in the developers section yet.
I just flashed myns warmtwopointthree and when running nenamark 2 i get about 20fps, I got about 26 on stock before root. I haven't messed with the cpu yet as i just flashed it, but i was wondering if anyone knows whats up with it.
I just don't want to sift through 2,500+ replies to find out. i read in the latest release notes that the gpu was overclocked but i'm getting worse performance. I wanted higher performance so i chose that rom. Anyone know why?
Unfortunately most apps are not multithreaded which means they're only going to use one core anyway. So if you want to see how your average app will perform, Quadrant is actually pretty good because it is written like most apps: for a single core.
If you want a benchmark more indicative of what the hardware is actually capable of, a multi-core test like CF Bench or SmartBench 2011 is in order. Unfortunately, I've found that the governors on most ROM's are not up to the task and they actually slow things down quite a bit so if you want max performance (numbers in the tests), you need to use SetCPU or a similar tool and choose the "performance" governor otherwise the phone will be jumping around at various clock speeds for all the tests. I've tried the "lag free", "smartass" and all the governors and none of them (on any ROM I've tested) truly know how to keep the CPU at your max frequency even when doing the demanding tasks that the benchmarks throw at it.
Mike
The other day I achieved the highest benchmark I've ever gotten on this beast of a phone with the help of rom toolbox. Here's how.
Go to performance in rom toolbox.
CPU slider set to 1.45 GHz (unified kernel)
Memory preset to agressive
SD boost set to 4096
Sysctl set to 4096, 50, 10, 1
Try these out and let me know if it helps. Post anything you changed to help others.
If your phone blows up or bricks (neither are likely to happen but) I'm not responsible,
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
How useful is sysctl and do you know any other tips about it?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Have no clue what it is or what it does......just know putting those numbers in there makes it faster lol......glad I could help
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
hatefuel19 said:
Have no clue what it is or what it does......just know putting those numbers in there makes it faster lol......glad I could help
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You expect people to follow your advice when you self admittedly have absolutely no idea what you are doing???
Thanks but no thanks!
CaelanT said:
You expect people to follow your advice when you self admittedly have absolutely no idea what you are doing???
Thanks but no thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I expect nothing. I know that by messing around I found a combo that raised antutu from the mid 5000 to a 6926. It also took cf-bench from 10000 range native to a 13700 native. Follow what I put or don't. I don't care. I don't know what I'm doing but I learn by trial and error. If you want to know what these values mean, Google it. If you want a quick and easy way to improve performance, give my settings a try.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
try antutu with default settings. use faux 1.45ghz kernel.
antutu usually gives bm score around 6900 for atrix with faux 1.45 ghz kernel.....
---------- Post added at 01:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------
you guys ever noticed the person who is at the top of the antutu atrix benchmarkk?? hes got a score of 7500 with the 1.45ghz. i always wonder how he made that score. i have tried all performance upgrades. my device usually comes with a score of 6900.
Newly flashed reloaded rom @ 1.45 gave me antutu score in the 5000 range. It was only after changing these values I could get into 6000s and blew me away when I got a 6926. I'm still tweaking the SD boost setting in rom toolbox. I could break 7000 if I could get just a little more out of it but I don't want to pay for a higher class card. I think mine is class 4.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys feel that stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
mforminio7 said:
Ive been trying to find the best performance/reliability from some of our kernels and have a question.
HTC stock kernel quadrant 2500
HTC stock kernel antutu 5200-5400
DSB's kernel quadrant 1700
DSB's kernel antutu 5600
SO my question is, how can stock be that much faster in quadrant? I know benchmarkas generally dont matter but thats an 800 point diffrence. DO you guys real stock is faster? And how come antutu doesnt reflect that big of a diffrence?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll learn very quick here that many believe quadrant to be insanely inaccurate. Only look at antutu for results.
Tho benchmarks vary, it all matters how fluid the phone feels while using it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using XDA App
and everyone knows that most all benchmarks are hit or miss... it all about how it feels to you
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Khayos said:
After 11 hours of use, with widgets & apps running on the latest version of quadrant I got the following on Scott's ics 3.1
Seems good to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about gingerbread stock vs non stock kernels not ics. I know ics scores higher in benchmarks.
I get 2550 using quadrant and its pretty much the same every time and I'm stock but I take these app with a grain of salt.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Lol I got 1730 with DSBs on 1.8ghz, obviously thats waayy wrong. I got higher than that with my old Desire at 1.15ghz, my old galaxy got over 3k a lot. Lol.
I found my old galaxy S last night and thought I would run a quick benchmark using Quadrant against my galaxy S2. As you would expect the S2 overal beat the S1... apart from 3D performance. It was only a few marks faster but the S1 did out perform. This was noticeable on the gpu section where they is a planet revolving around the frame rate was almost double that of the s2. Both phones are running ginger bread 2.3.5 @ stock
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Ive now come to the conclusion the quadrant simply is **** :d
ics 3D perf gone up but 2d dropped dramatically obviously far too software limited.
My goodness that notification bar is packed
same here my eyes were on the noti bar ,,its full.
victorator said:
First of all, look at all the things you have running in the background on the S2.
Second thing, you're probably running the android 4 optimized version of quadrant on the s2 and the old gb version on the s1.
Install the newest on both. Reboot them both. Test then.
If you still have problems go into settings->applications->running and see what's slowing down your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the replies are either fanboyism or just honest ignorance and mistakes.
First of all he is running the same current version on both.
All those things running in the background are actually on the S1 not the S2...
Frozenthunder said:
It's propably because the software runs more efficient on the S1.
Also who cares about benchmarks anyways? There aren't any apps out there for the S2 which have good graphics or bring the processors to its limits. Name me one which does that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not just quadrant standard that shows this. I have consistently been dissapointed with the SGS2 3d perf in general.
Name one?
Jet car stunts runs worse on the SGS2 and looks worse than on the SGS1.
The SGS2 refresh rate is also lower making games run worse.
IF you look at sysetm information, CUBE MAPS and CROSSBAR COMBINED not supported on the SGS2. Everything supported on the SGS1.
Personal experience, a lot of 3D games run much nicer and look nicer on the SGS1.
Really disappointed withe SGS2 screen and 3D perf.
The SGS 2 has a Mali gpu, while the SGS 1 has a PowerVR gpu. Theoretically SGS 2 should be faster but because of architecture differences it may behave worse under conditions that favour the PowerVR. I have not had problems with my SGS 2 being slow but I have not played really demanding games yet.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
DramatikBeats said:
My goodness that notification bar is packed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Emexrulsier said:
It's because that phone hasn't been switched on for a ages and it also has no Sim so when I turned it on things like Ebay spring up with old messages
Sent from my GT-I9100P using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for benchmark u can try Antutu app over Qadrant app since it gives more accurate results over and above Quadrant one
Before I bought my L21 device, I had looked around on the internet and I had found some videos where this device's Antutu score was around 44560. I've check my device score and it is 36359. Where is the truth? How much is your devices' Antutu scores?
Mine was also in the same range as yours. 35901. The 3D score and RAM really were low compared to other budget phones I'm evaluating like the Blu Life One X.
5X was 2594 for 3D. Blu was 5419. WTF?
yeah i think this is a realy bad score. my score is as low as your.
But i own a MotoXPlay with Snapdragon 615 and the 3d Score there is over 8000 Points
mxr576 said:
Before I bought my L21 device, I had looked around on the internet and I had found some videos where this device's Antutu score was around 44560. I've check my device score and it is 36359. Where is the truth? How much is your devices' Antutu scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
L24 with similar scores 36389, 3D only 2554, RAM at 3807. I expected better. Had open a few apps when running the test, maybe that had an impact.
Just took the test, my results:
3461, 3D
15795, UX
13828, CPU
3535, RAM
35619, Total
Was that with or without smart power saving? I heard that it seems to add more lagg than time..
PS thinking of buying to replace my dying gt-i9300 (galaxy s3)
Just tested and got 36018. Seems like it should be like 5-10k higher. Maybe custom ROMs will help some.
Also, since we have the kernel source and everything, won't we be able to overclock it some?
34230 for me.
3D score of 2494.
Turned on Airplane mode:
35144
3D: 2646
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Its L22
Sent from my KIW-L22 using Tapatalk
Kounjula Rahul said:
Its L22
Sent from my KIW-L22 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
37236, looks like we have a winner
Did you do anything special to get this score?
Bandit Development said:
37236, looks like we have a winner
Did you do anything special to get this score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing..just powersaving set to Normal..!!
Sent from my KIW-L22 using Tapatalk
I rooted the phone and used the debloat script to get rid of unnecessary apps. I couldn't find the power-savings setting, can someone point me to where that is? Don't know if rooting it and running that script got rid of it.
Thanks
retepoh said:
I rooted the phone and used the debloat script to get rid of unnecessary apps. I couldn't find the power-savings setting, can someone point me to where that is? Don't know if rooting it and running that script got rid of it.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the debloat script removes the phone manager app...which I believe does the battery saving "magic."
What? My "hundred-year-old" Galaxy S4 mini gets around 40000 points (CM13, f4ktion kernel, no overclocking). Unbelievable!
There must be something seriously wrong with those first release ROMs of 5x.
this is exactly why we need a stock rom that's not bloated.