Motorola ATRIX 4G or Lg Thrill 4G? - Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Kindly help me to choose from ATRIX or Thrill
i have ARIX but i got an exchange deal with Thrill + Rs.1500($30) INR
From all specs i understand Thrill is overall better phone but
atrix has 1GB ram where 512 in thrill(but still its fast)
thrill has very poor life where atrix has 2000 mah battery.
atrix has better developer support.
thrill has 4.3" 3D screen
What i am concerned is:
1. if thrill play 1080p mkv download from net without convert
2. Games compatibility with thrill
3. video Gtalk
what you people wants to suggest?

to me the RAM is a big deal, the dev support is also important. I would stick with the Atrix

+1
1 GB of RAM is indeed a big plus on the Atrix.
Having 1 GB of RAM will allow (theoretically) an upgrade path to ICS or whatever comes next. Having actual ICS developers successfully working on this is another issue altogether though.
Also, you pretty much summarized all the features that makes the Atrix a better option compared to the Thrill. Although you forgot to mention the biometric scanner on the Atrix.
However, playing 1080P MKVs on the Atrix (or any other smartphone that I've tried) is not really good. At least on the Atrix you'll have to resort to a third party app like MX Video Player and use Software decoding since there is no hardware acceleration MKV codecs as of yet.
Video calls of the Atrix work awesomely good as you may have noticed.
In the end, the best phone is the one you end up using and liking, no matter what people say.
Cheers!
Rayan

And don't forget the lapdock! Once you hack that and turn it into a (mostly) real linux box it's quite nice.

Thrill is better than atrix. and already have a full working ICS port, and,well... Atrix have a buggy kang of cm9...
Choose a phone thinking in the software, not about hardware.... I learned this with the atrix
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

stewartsoda said:
And don't forget the lapdock! Once you hack that and turn it into a (mostly) real linux box it's quite nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed!
The lapdock, or should I say the Webtop option on the Atrix makes it better, much better in my opinion. Also LG is not the best in hardware design, all their models look and feel cheap and bulky, also in my opinion...
Does the Thrill have HDMI output?
Sent from my Atrix 4G using Tapatalk

thanks all of you for sharing ur experience.. this is really helping me out.

Atrix...my first Android and will be my only one until I see something better. Thus far, even the galaxy nexus is no match.

thats odd i had to go see since someone said working ics port and it looks more like they are still working with froyo mostly and some nightlies of cm7.anyway atrix all day if your itching for a new phone wait for a quad core to come out in a few months.if you have a dual core phone now anything you buy would just be a lateral move

Always Motorola, LG had never had a great reputation with the reliability of their hardware. Motorola always has better battery life, better call quality and better signal reception. Those are important right !!!
manrock111 said:
Kindly help me to choose from ATRIX or Thrill
i have ARIX but i got an exchange deal with Thrill + Rs.1500($30) INR
From all specs i understand Thrill is overall better phone but
atrix has 1GB ram where 512 in thrill(but still its fast)
thrill has very poor life where atrix has 2000 mah battery.
atrix has better developer support.
thrill has 4.3" 3D screen
What i am concerned is:
1. if thrill play 1080p mkv download from net without convert
2. Games compatibility with thrill
3. video Gtalk
what you people wants to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

+1 for the ATRIX. Lg will never make the same quality stuff as Motorola.
Sent from my Atrix XDA Premium App

atrix.....
the atrix dev team is developing cm9 secretly... so their ubld is probably just as good as lg thrilll, if not better

no! I don't think lg is all that but motorola sucks!
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium

guidoido004 said:
Thrill is better than atrix. and already have a full working ICS port, and,well... Atrix have a buggy kang of cm9...
Choose a phone thinking in the software, not about hardware.... I learned this with the atrix
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I call BS on that (unless its sarcasm), the Thrill doesn't even have full working Gingerbread, nevermind ICS.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)

Moto! ATRIX also as the finger scanner and I rooted mine. I can run ANY app on the market no problems what so ever.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

quarlow said:
I call BS on that (unless its sarcasm), the Thrill doesn't even have full working Gingerbread, nevermind ICS.
Sent from my Galaxy S II (i777)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it does
Press thx if I helped!
Sent from my LG Thrill 4G on Cm7 Nightlies with ICS theme!

Atrix
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

ianwardell said:
Atrix
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boo
Press thx if I helped!
Sent from my LG Thrill 4G on Cm7 Nightlies with ICS theme!

Ask this question in the general Android section, you may get a better sample of responses. Personally I'd stick with the Atrix, but horses for courses and all that...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

512 ram on LG, makes me feel its gonna be slow the phone and the 1500ma battery wont last like Atrix,,,, I prefer Atrix, (Atrix comes with nvidia)

Related

Is it bad if I trade vibrant for g2?

This is my final decision please tell me if im doing a right or wrong.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
No, look at specs vs vibrant
http://g2.t-mobile.com/g2-specs
The big issue i have hear regarding the g2 is its major hinge problem. But thats just what i heave read and hear, not from personal experience. Do so more research, head to a T-mobile store and check one out for yourself.
I have it is good
Hmmm ....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I wouldn't do it personally. I hate physical keyboards. I'll take Swype and a smaller phone any day.
It comes down to what keyboard do you like and can you get 4G speeds. I can't where I am (they say we have H but i get the same speeds as all my friends with MyTouch 4's).
I think yea preferences
I will do it
For kb
Stock google
Stronger cpu
Love my vibrant but need a little junk in my trunk
Thanks guys especially tw and eugene and master
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Alanrocks15 said:
I think yea preferences
I will do it
For kb
Stock google
Stronger cpu
Love my vibrant but need a little junk in my trunk
Thanks guys especially tw and eugene and master
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
G2 doesn't have a [fully]stock android system
Who cares? If you want gaming and movies the vibrant wins hands down. Other than that g2 is better. Both are about equal but what i said above about games and movies
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Also it comes down to preferences
Just like roms
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
As many have said. If you use your phone for games and music keep the vibrant. I have the g2 and the vibrant and imo the vibrant has its downsides as does the g2. The screen on the g2 looks fuzzy compared to the vibrant and the speaker sucks! What got me into getting the g2 was the keyboard the long lasting battery and the trackpad...If you have any questions ask me and ill answer them
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
the question is that do you want a keyboard??
so yeaaa if you need a keyboard then go with the g2 .there is no such reason trading your vibrant for a g2.
i had both, i say vibrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=874754
I have a g2, my brother a vibrent, and I say g2. My brother has sent his vibrent back 3 times so far. He has had it for 2 months. He also has bricked it many times (his doing I'm sure). I have yet to brick my g2, and I have swap many roms and kernals. His GPS is crap, along with his 3g. My g2 has everything his vibrent has and more. My g2 has 4g speeds, wifi hotspot( I even play mw2 on ps3 with no lag), a qwerty keypad, swype, 2.2 froyo, faster cpu, and a more true form of a google phone. I have my phone OC to 1.8MHz and my battery last all day with the help of setcpu. The Z hinge is not much of a problem, only if you lay on your back and use the keypad, but the way you hold the phone stops that problem. The g2 is able to do every thing the vibrent can and more but in the end its all up to you. Its your time and money, go to the store and take a look for your self.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Your cpu is not faster. Its more efficient. And dont act like the g2 is that much better. In fact if my vibrant had 4g like the next one id suffice to say the vibrant was plain better.
I do like the feel of the g2. Solid and if your getting robbed it can defend your life. Keyboard is nice.
The 4"screen on the vibrant really is better to type with. Swype is better than the physical kep pad.
And last but best of all the screen on the vibrant smashes the g2. Your talking two diffrent generations of screens.
Roms cancel any os disputes.
After the vibrant gets 2.2 official it will be more efficient. And its still plenty efficient.
The gps in the vibrant is trash. Some work. Some dont.
The vibrant 4g will be a better phone.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
My phone has swype, I think an even better version. And we are not talking about the new vibrent. That's another phone.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Bdix said:
My phone has swype, I think an even better version. And we are not talking about the new vibrent. That's another phone.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Lol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I'm thinking about trading my Vibrant for a G2 today. Is there anything I should know before I do? Is it easy to flash? What good ROMS are available? Does T-Mobile charge extra for 4G?

Samsung Vibrant vs myTouch 4G?

Hi guys, im going back to android (had a G1 a year ago) from blackberry (got tired) and im getting two good offers on these phones, but since these smartphones are SO different to what i used to have (G1 xD), im kinda confused wich one is better, so i want you guys to help me out here, wich is one should i get? Vibrant or myTouch 4G?
Internet speed its not important since i don't live in a 4G area (in fact, there isn't any 4G coverage at all in my country), but i like to play games and stuff like that. I like my phone to be fast and with very little lag. I have read on internet that Samsung's Hummingbird processor its better than the Snapdragon proccesor that the myTouch 4G have, but, i don't know why, i keep reading on forums that the myTouch 4G is faster than the Vibrant...how is that possible? The Vibrant have more RAM, ROM (16GB Internal, the myTouch have only 4GB), faster proccesor, better GPU...well, im a little confused there too.
Any opinions?
Mytouch 4G. It has way more features and has a bigger community of devs.
Camera with FLASH! Trackpad. Front Camera. Metallic build quality.
With both phones stock, the HTC has 700+ mb of ram available and the Vibrant has only 304+ available. The other issue is file systems. The HTC uses I think ext4 and the Vibrant uses its home grown system of RFS. I feel the RFS system is probable the biggest issue to slow the phone down. I have mine rooted with custom rom that uses ext4 (voodoo) and it is faster with much better battery life then all the stock MT4G's that I have seen. If you are not going to root anything then I would recommend the MT4G or even look at the G2x. But the screen on the vibrant is killer
myTouch4G has 768mb ram, Vibrant has 512mb (about 330mb is available for Android to use, depending on the rom).
I'd say the MSM8255 Snapdragon is probably on-par with the Hummingbird in the SGS - the SGS does have a much better GPU for 3D gaming, though.
The Vibrant may have a 16gb ROM, but only 2gb is available for app storage, the rest is treated as an internal SD card.
They would both be great phones, but the Vibrant has the better screen.
I have a vibrant and my wife has a mt4g. I would say if youre going to root and flash roms get the vibrant, but if youre going to leave it stock get the mt4g. Both phones were laggy stock to me. Im much happier with the dev community for the vibrant though. I've flashed 6 or 7 different roms on the mt4g (including cm7) but none of them seem as complete as bionix or trigger
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Ok, i forgot to say this, but im TOTALLY going to root the phone. In fact, is one of the mains reasons that im comming back to android (and here plays the song "Im comming home" by Dirty Money ), i love flashing roms, looking for bugs in new roms, the excitement of someone releasing a new rom (like Cyanogen), trying out weird apps in the market place and all that kind of stuff, i DON'T like stock phones at all...i installed OS6 on my Blackberry 9300 as soon as i got it, looking for something different (running away from stock), still was a pretty boring phone tough.
You have told me guys that both phones stock, the MT4G its faster, but what about both phones rooted? Should i get the Vibrant? Or even both phones rooted, the myTouch its still better?
EDIT: Also, are the Samsung Vibrant and the Samsung Captivate the exact same device? Under the hood, of course.
Tmobile g2
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
flipnotiq said:
Tmobile g2
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your input.
Anyone else?
Both rooted running custom roms with no overclock my vibrant and my wifes mt4g scored within 6 points of each other on quandrant. I'd say it come down the ffc if that's important to you or super amoled screen (more important to me)
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
bfranklin1986 said:
Both rooted running custom roms with no overclock my vibrant and my wifes mt4g scored within 6 points of each other on quandrant. I'd say it come down the ffc if that's important to you or super amoled screen (more important to me)
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FFC? Whats that? Sorry for the noobie question...
EDIT: Nevermind, just guessed what it is...Front Face Camera, right?
Hm, if i guessed right, then having a FFC its not important to me, i don't like video calls.
Any more inputs?
do you use your phone as a media player? if yes get the vibrant.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
iynfynity said:
do you use your phone as a media player? if yes get the vibrant.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a yes for sure. Every single moment im alone, in the bus or something alike. im listening to music.
Anyone else?
Well, I absolutely love my vibrant. Plenty fast (q score 1600+), amoled screen rules, and camera takes amazing pix. Flash isn't an issue since I don't really take pix in the dark lol.
It has less ram, but its near impossible to hard brick from what I've read. I'd say go vibrant, and if you don't like it, flash back to stock and exchange for the mt4g.
Sent from my robot vacuum smartphone using black magic and goat blood
bdgiese90 said:
Well, I absolutely love my vibrant. Plenty fast (q score 1600+), amoled screen rules, and camera takes amazing pix. Flash isn't an issue since I don't really take pix in the dark lol.
It has less ram, but its near impossible to hard brick from what I've read. I'd say go vibrant, and if you don't like it, flash back to stock and exchange for the mt4g.
Sent from my robot vacuum smartphone using black magic and goat blood
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My problem its that im buying it second hand, so its not as easy as i"f i dont like it, i just take it back..." So thats why i have to make the right choice, because oncei buy the phone, its going to be difficult to sell it again.
Well, I'd say that if you don't have 4g coverage, why buy a 4g phone. Its like buying a Ferrari when you live in Poland. Maybe not as expensive, but you can't take full advantage of it. Lol.
Do you have any questions about the phone itself? Not spec wise?
Sent from my robot vacuum smartphone using black magic and goat blood
Vibrant all the way, I'm telling you its a wonderful phone. Samsung captivate and the Samsung vibrant are exactly the same under the hood.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
ameedi600 said:
Vibrant all the way, I'm telling you its a wonderful phone. Samsung captivate and the Samsung vibrant are exactly the same under the hood.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen to that.
Sent from my robot vacuum smartphone using black magic and goat blood
If you are into gaming, then vibrant hands down. Here are the things I would take into consideration.
1. Bigger dev community for the mytouch4g. I think most of the people with the vibrant will be leaving for the Sensation or the galaxy 2 if they have the funds. I am going with the galaxy S 2 myself. With that being said the development will dwindle down to nothing by the end of the summer.
2. There are great roms for the vibrant right now. Trigger, Bionix, and a bunch of stable 2.2.1 roms to choose from.
3. I don't know if a stable cm7 will ever happen for the vibrant. They have it working ok. Plenty of bugs, and bad battery. Also no 2.3 rom has working gps because of drivers. You will have to wait on a leaked 2.3 rom for the vibrant I think.
I love my vibrant for gaming. I have about 5 Gameloft games.. bogo for $2.99 . Can't beat that. And the phone handles them beautifully. I am running Trigger btw, just because I wanted a stable rom until I get the galaxy 2 .
I hope this helps with your decision, I know I rambled a bit. But I think i covered everything on the development side for you.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Cm7 runs fine for me. However, I don't use GPS so it suits my needs. Runs fast needs daily charge, but meh, that's what sleep is for lol
Sent from my robot vacuum smartphone using black magic and goat blood
On top of what everyone else said, Voodoo sound on the vibrant makes listening to music through the 3.5 mm jack a dream. I can't go back now. It's just too good.

[Q] vibrant vs evo?

I've got a vibrant with trigger 3.2, but im getting the option for an Evo
I LOVE my vibrant...especially the screen...but wanna hear opinions on this. Thanks
Your choice both are great and are powerful.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I would stick with the vibrant just for the 16 gig internal sd card, the possibility of an external sd, the best gpu of this generation, faster processor and the superior screen. It's a no brainer.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Screen was a big thing...are there any good roms for evo
it has miui, but so does the vibrant. if you haven't tried it definitely flash the one in segnaros thread.
I have both phones...yes both are great in their own ways.....as for roms available evo wins.....but in every aspect + roms that everything works....the vibrant wins over all
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Shortbus-Driver said:
I have both phones...yes both are great in their own ways.....as for roms available evo wins.....but in every aspect + roms that everything works....the vibrant wins over all
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you explain?
Since the evo has the availability of source code for everything(kernel AND roms, which Samsung doesn't give out rom source), has official gingerbread, and has a stable CM7 (after 100 or so nightlies, which is probably how it will be with the vibrant). I would say the EVO wins most definitely with developement (it is an incredibly powerful phone).
But I still love the vibrant for GPU, CPU, and screen. We are getting there development wise.
Sent from SGH-T959 (CM7)
djluis48 said:
I would stick with the vibrant just for the 16 gig internal sd card, the possibility of an external sd, the best gpu of this generation, faster processor and the superior screen. It's a no brainer.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better cpu also... better kernels available lols, voodoo man,
Cool thanks this will help abunch
VIb GMV
evo is nice but the Vib has better components and it's noticeable.
the screen the sound GPU and storage.
Vibrant wins.
scrizz said:
VIb GMV
evo is nice but the Vib has better components and it's noticeable.
the screen the sound GPU and storage.
Vibrant wins.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont forget battery that lasts longer than 5 hours when using the phone
are you talking original evo or evo 3d?
sroach23 said:
are you talking original evo or evo 3d?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Original evo
Why don't you make a thread over in their forums and see what kinda response's you get.
id like to see those answers in there forum! funny
I have a vibrant and I like the rom,kernel,etc support...but I like the build of the EVO.
kawika said:
Why don't you make a thread over in their forums and see what kinda response's you get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just wondering what they would say...i mean I know theyd pick their Evos but if they thought about it Vibrant is clear winner.

[Q] Atrix still bad?

so it's been a few months since the last thread regarding how the atrix is.
I currently have a Inspire 4G and I'm debating on getting the Atrix.
You own it, I want to know about it! What do you think? Should I make the switch?
The answer to your question is entirely subjective.
Was it ever bad? Debuted a super phone?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
It was good when it was locked, now that it is unlocked it is turning into a behemoth. Just wait until you see a polished CM7 rom on this thing.
it was never bad, otherwise this forum would be desolate.
If you are willing to unlock and flash custom ROM, its a beast.
If you have to live with the stock firmware, there's probably better options out there, unless you really hate 4.3 form factor.
put it to you this way the locked bootloader was why alot of people didnt care for it but the bootloader can be unlocked now and the custom rom train is going to pick up steam, as some one else said cm7 for one thing
It's better than the Inspire that I owned.
Don't listen to what they say in the Inspire forums. The Inspire isn't the best AT&T has and the Atrix is a lot better than what people think. It's a very nice phone.
Not trying to put the Inspire down at all--I just know because I've owned both of them. The Atrix beats it and the Nexus S that I have...
---
- adb push iPad2post.apk to /forum/thread
Zbor said:
so it's been a few months since the last thread regarding how the atrix is.
I currently have a Inspire 4G and I'm debating on getting the Atrix.
You own it, I want to know about it! What do you think? Should I make the switch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, it was never bad. As a stock device that was incapable of installing kernels, it was good. I still found myself using my Captivate while the bootloader was locked. Now that there's ROMs and kernels available, I haven't touched my Cappy at all.
wow! I wasn't expecting that many responses so fast!
I want to root the phone, play ff7 (of course) and ENJOY the phone.
I put a custom rom on my inspire so I don't see why I wouldn't put a custom rom on the atrix...
Trying to get the inspire back to "out of the box" state so I can return it.
The only issue I have with the inspire is running fpse and ff7. little laggy at times. hoping the dual core will remedy the issue.
hell, it's the same price and you get more internal memory, hdmi cable, and a better CPU..
Zbor said:
wow! I wasn't expecting that many responses so fast!
I want to root the phone, play ff7 (of course) and ENJOY the phone.
I put a custom rom on my inspire so I don't see why I wouldn't put a custom rom on the atrix...
Trying to get the inspire back to "out of the box" state so I can return it.
The only issue I have with the inspire is running fpse and ff7. little laggy at times. hoping the dual core will remedy the issue.
hell, it's the same price and you get more internal memory, hdmi cable, and a better CPU..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never had any lag on any emulator I've tried. I don't think I've lagged once in a game.
Sent from my cm7 Atrix
Atrix is the best phone i've used, honestly. I wouldn't trade it for anything, except maybe SGSII.
Sure, it has some bugs and issues at the moment, but those will be fixed or bypassed eventually. Atrix has a great dev community.
People here there using the CM7 PRE-BETA for daily use.. And they are sh****** their pants..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Paschalis said:
People here there using the CM7 PRE-BETA for daily use.. And they are sh****** their pants..
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Get CM7 on this baby and she flys
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA Premium App
Yeah CM7s pretty nice. It definitely makes this phone 10x better.
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
awesome. I'll get the phone this evening and start in on the hacking
btw, does the phone still get really hot?
BravoMotorola said:
Yeah CM7s pretty nice. It definitely makes this phone 10x better.
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running CM7 Pre-beta as daily use right now, with a few minor bugs, and it is sick fast.
Zbor said:
btw, does the phone still get really hot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine doesn't ever get hot.
The only time mine gets warm is if it's hot outside and I use GPS.
Zbor said:
btw, does the phone still get really hot?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only time my phone gets hot is when I'm using it with the car dock, where it's charging, playing Slacker/Pandora/Google Music, and sitting in the hot sun.

Atrix or nexus s??

Just want opinions. Thank you
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Without sd card reader, half the ram, single core cpu, lower resolution screen, IMO the Atrix, hands down. Nexus S is a phone of the past.
Sure, it's a Google Phone, it gets everything first, but with CM7 picking up it's pace as it has been on the Atrix, I don't see why anyone would pick the Nexus S instead.
Go go Atrix!
Agreed the Atrix has better specs. The Nexus S is a nice phone, I've gotten to play with it because my cousin has one. The Atrix is superior hardware and the Nexus S will get the official Google updates first. If I was going to pick between the two, I would definitely choose my Atrix, but I would also be happy with a Nexus S. I've been running the newest CM weekly with fingerprint for about 48 hours and have been very impressed with it.
I have the atrix running cm7 oc'd 1.45 but I wanna trade for BNIB NEXUS S WHITE
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Depends on whether you are planning to load a custom ROM. If not, definitely don't use the Atrix. If yes, then the Atrix is probably better (unless you need a bigger screen or are a camera buff).
I love the atrix but, I have to ask....
If your going to buy a new phone why don't you get... "A new phone"?
Samsung Galaxy S II ?
Samsung Galaxy Nexus ?
and yes stock moto sucks.
Because I'm not buying I'm trading.. know anyone that wanna trade atrix for galaxy nexus. Yeah. Lol
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Newbleeto said:
Without sd card reader, half the ram, single core cpu, lower resolution screen, IMO the Atrix, hands down. Nexus S is a phone of the past.
Sure, it's a Google Phone, it gets everything first, but with CM7 picking up it's pace as it has been on the Atrix, I don't see why anyone would pick the Nexus S instead.
Go go Atrix!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
This pretty much sums up what I was gonna say myself...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
But will I notice a speed difference with it overclocked??
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
It's pretty fast anyway without overclock, but when you get over the 100 app mark then you notice that it doesn't perform as fast. But overclocking to 1.45Ghz makes a significant difference to the speed.
So oc'ing the ns however fast(I haven't looked it up)would be nearly the same speed I'm having now on my atrix?? Or will I noticelag on the ns
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
navykid0211 said:
So oc'ing the ns however fast(I haven't looked it up)would be nearly the same speed I'm having now on my atrix?? Or will I noticelag on the ns
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will notice lag. No matter how much you OC it, it won't be as smooth as the Atrix.
That's not saying the NS is a bad phone, but the only time I've used mine since i've had my Atrix is when the ICS SDK port was released.
I would go with the Nexus S. The probable lack of Sammich on the Atrix is a deal breaker for me.

Categories

Resources