Let's benchmark your EVO 3D - HTC EVO 3D

I wonder how effective the different ROMs are out there.
After performing S-OFF to my beloved EVO 3D I'm trying out the different cooked ROMs with the different flavors.
Apart from the feelings and "personal tastes" I wanted to have an objective point of view about the performance.
In order to do that, I installed Antutu Benchmark in every ROM I'm trying out and I want to share with you the results.
I didn't performed the same with the Vodafone Stock ROM so I don't have this report.
I know the limitations of this kind of software but I'm not comparing different devices. Just the same EVO 3D with alternative ROMs.
Anyway here is the first result from the ROM MikRunny V1.02
See attached picture or follow this link: http://imahgin.blogspot.com/2012/01/rom-mickrunny-v102-para-evo-3d.html

mahg said:
I wonder how effective the different ROMs are out there.
After performing S-OFF to my beloved EVO 3D I'm trying out the different cooked ROMs with the different flavors.
Apart from the feelings and "personal tastes" I wanted to have an objective point of view about the performance.
In order to do that, I installed Antutu Benchmark in every ROM I'm trying out and I want to share with you the results.
I didn't performed the same with the Vodafone Stock ROM so I don't have this report.
I know the limitations of this kind of software but I'm not comparing different devices. Just the same EVO 3D with alternative ROMs.
Anyway here is the first result from the ROM MikRunny V1.02
See attached picture or follow this link: http://imahgin.blogspot.com/2012/01/rom-mickrunny-v102-para-evo-3d.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, benchmarks mean absolutely nothing. I don't know why people continually ask the question and use benchmarks to judge a phone/ROM. I used to have a Motorola Atrix, very similar to the Photon. The Atrix blew the 3D away in benchmarks and was nowhere near as fast. I have also used ROMs that were smoother than the next and scored lower on benchmarks. On the other hand I have also used ROMs that lagged a ton and scored higher on benchmarks. The only true way to find out which ROM is the fastest is to flash it and check it out. Also, a lot of phones act differently with different ROMs/kernels. My friend also has a 3D and what is fast and stable on my phone isn't always fast and stable on his phone.
Just check them out.
Sent from my ICS lovin 3D!!!
If I've helped you in any way... hit the "Thanks" button.

Well, As I stated, I know the limitations of these tests but I guess that using the same device could have a positive result.
In fact, I find some ROMs faster and smoother than others and I wonder to know 'how much' just to confirm 'my feelelings'.
For example, I found ROM KingCobra3D 1.8.1 a little bit slower than MikRunny although I have some issues with sound in this last one.
Here is the result when benchmarking the KingCobra ROM: http://imahgin.blogspot.com/2012/01/rom-kingcobra3d-181.html

I had results around 6500-7500 (Antutu Benchmarks points ) when i was using MIUI ROM ( forgot the kernel )

mnomaanw said:
I had results around 6500-7500 (Antutu Benchmarks points ) when i was using MIUI ROM ( forgot the kernel )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW, that's impressive. I'll give it a try.
I tried out Leedroid but I found it unstable. In fact it crashes when performing the Open GL test thus I can't see the overall results.

The best benchmark there is is just using your phone. Watch some videos, play some games, and just browse the web. If it seems fluid, then the phone is doing its job

That's understood.
Still fun.
I got 5517 with leedroid 5.1 and anthrax kernel. Oc to 1.51.
locked & loaded

SolsticeZero said:
The best benchmark there is is just using your phone. Watch some videos, play some games, and just browse the web. If it seems fluid, then the phone is doing its job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. In fact that's what I'm doing. Every ROM that I install I perform a full testing specially video playing.
For example I found MikRunny ROM faster than others but the FM radio doesn't work so it's not suitable for me. I wonder how other users customize their EVO 3D and apply tricks to improve the phone.
This is not a competition, simply for fun.

Here's my ROM with chad's v9 kernel at 1.53 GHz

This is another review. Now I'm testing LeeDrOiD V5.1.0.
The prevoious version was very unstable for me -maybe because I didn't wipe the cache - but now it seems to work fine.
Attached you will see the result

Here's SteelH's rom [email protected] 1.51 with chads kernel
Locked & Loaded
""shooter on Deck""

dont have a screen... but virus' 1.4 ODEXED with ziggy's latest kernel....
7500 in antutu... 4200 in quadrant... 17 seconds on RL bench...
that was on lag free governor at 1.72 ghz... ran it like that as a daily for a solid month.

To the people who always inevitably chime in that benchmarks are worthless: benchmark apps are a reference tool, and are rather useful for many aspects of testing out roms and kernels. Obviously their real world value is different. I'm sorry, it may just be me, but its sort of insulting to peoples intelligence for someone to always point out the obvious about the reality of benchmarks. They are however very use full and fun and very important as reference tools.
I bench everything, come on I'm a geek, like I wouldn't dyno my Ferrari if I owned one...
shesh, some people are no fun
anyway, I'm running ics now so I never used anutu on my previous setups, but my fastest was 4007 quadrant on joelz cm7 with one of the anthrax kernels, and 4000 on Airborne 2.3.4 with ziggys kernel.
oh ya both on lag free at 1.72

Related

Which Rom gives more performance boost?

Which Rom for atrix gives more performance boost? (ive been lookingin aria, alien or CM) can suggest one of yours too. Im looking it for games..
Just from my own readings I believe that the CM7 pre-beta guys have gotten the highest quadrant scores. there is the slight thing with the camera though. I use alien myself and haven't had any problems but i'm mostly doing gensoid gaming. I haven't tried aura yet but it does look good. not sure if this helps you
Thanks it does help, i seen the screenshot it got 4000 on quadrant i run quadrant on my overweighted atrix (lots and lots of apps) i got around 1500, so i think it will give a boost =) maybe ill stick with the stock rom till CM comes stable.
Do your alien run better than stock? how much better?
Lordareon said:
Thanks it does help, i seen the screenshot it got 4000 on quadrant i run quadrant on my overweighted atrix (lots and lots of apps) i got around 1500, so i think it will give a boost =) maybe ill stick with the stock rom till CM comes stable.
Do your alien run better than stock? how much better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
using CM7, the stock camera doesn't work too well, but you can get around that by using a few third party apps from the market.
the fingerprint sensor doesn't work (which really sucks, because that was a major selling point of the phone for me) but i'm just dealing with that.
i've been averaging between 3700-4000 quadrant scores, and pretty much loving everything about CM7. i wasn't too big of a fan of all that motoblur stuff, so it's pretty awesome to get rid of it all.
it's definitely ready for a daily driver, for me at least, as long as you're willing to sacrifice the fingerprint scanner, and use crappy workarounds for the camera.
But fixes are on the way right? to get around those issues? i just want to have a smooth browser scrolling =( hope CM gives that.
Lordareon said:
Thanks it does help, i seen the screenshot it got 4000 on quadrant i run quadrant on my overweighted atrix (lots and lots of apps) i got around 1500, so i think it will give a boost =) maybe ill stick with the stock rom till CM comes stable.
Do your alien run better than stock? how much better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like it a lot more than stock. It's fully deodexed so all of the themes that people put together can be flashed over that rom. I'm a huge fan of CM7 on my nook color but I am waiting patiently for the camera and fingerprint scanner to be fixed when they can get to it. I have a company policy for exchange mail that requires a password and it's way easier to swipe and be in than to enter a password everytime.
yeah, but im seeying all this on the perfomance side cyanogen looks awesome so ill keep the stock then jump to cyanogen when its fully compatible, and then the ultimate android Ice cream sandwich come, hopefully with hardware acceleration then it will crush all iphones Muhahaha
I'm using Aura 1.1.3 Debloat #7 and it seems to be very fast. I use SetCPU and have it underclock the processor to 216 MHz when the screen is off. On the other roms, the phone would hiccup for a while before coming to full speed when I turned the screen on. On this Aura rom, I can barely notice a slowdown in the first half second and it goes straight to full power then. I believe it's because this rom is only 150 MB, as opposed to others like CherryBlur, which is 560 MB.
Every ROM has it's points.... I look at the list of whats included: My biggest thing is tethering but I was able to do it on every ROM so it really depends on what you're going to add to it. If you have a ton of apps, something that is debloated/deblurred is probably best but not important. Quadrant scores don't seem like they are entirely trustworthy enough to make one a winner over the other. CM7 isn't gingerbread so I wouldn't include that one right now in the mix. They all are stable though. I like Aura/Darkside and Alien. Ninja is still a favorite of mine as well. I don't use the camera much so D3 or stoc doesn't make a difference to me but you might have a preference. I'm not a Star Wars fan but I tride that one and it was smooth....I liked the Darth Vader breathing when the SD cards mounted LOL. I use ADW for a launcher beause it gives me the choice of several themes and 5 icons on the dock.

Extremely Poor Quadrant Scores around 800ish... I know, I know

I have a new 3D and loving it and it's smooth fast and runs all the games an everything awesome. However when it comes to Quadrant, the phone just does not like it. I get about 800-1k quadrants everytime I run it.. I know Quadrant means nothing.. But clearly after reading around I have not seen anyone else with the issue.
I am on HBOOT 1.50 rooted running Myns Warm and the Infected Anthrax kernel. I have wiped and done clean installs about 3-4 times, tried using the stock kernel as well. Wiped Davik an Cache a million times and I still have the issue.
The only reason this bothers me is because of my co worker with the Galaxy S 2 is running circles around me in Quadrant unrooted and its pissing me off. Any suggestions? Help me out
I know how you feel with competing with a gaxaly s2 phone. My dad just got a epic touch. Those are still oddly low quadrant scores. Maybe try switching your setup a lil
Sent from my EVO 3D using xda premium
Swayyy said:
I have a new 3D and loving it and it's smooth fast and runs all the games an everything awesome. However when it comes to Quadrant, the phone just does not like it. I get about 800-1k quadrants everytime I run it.. I know Quadrant means nothing.. But clearly after reading around I have not seen anyone else with the issue.
I am on HBOOT 1.50 rooted running Myns Warm and the Infected Anthrax kernel. I have wiped and done clean installs about 3-4 times, tried using the stock kernel as well. Wiped Davik an Cache a million times and I still have the issue.
The only reason this bothers me is because of my co worker with the Galaxy S 2 is running circles around me in Quadrant unrooted and its pissing me off. Any suggestions? Help me out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who cares? Just show him some 3D movies, pics and games. Then tell him to stick his benchmarks up his @$$!
Sent by my Supercharged dual core from the 3rd Dimension
Swayyy said:
I have a new 3D and loving it and it's smooth fast and runs all the games an everything awesome. However when it comes to Quadrant, the phone just does not like it. I get about 800-1k quadrants everytime I run it.. I know Quadrant means nothing.. But clearly after reading around I have not seen anyone else with the issue.
I am on HBOOT 1.50 rooted running Myns Warm and the Infected Anthrax kernel. I have wiped and done clean installs about 3-4 times, tried using the stock kernel as well. Wiped Davik an Cache a million times and I still have the issue.
The only reason this bothers me is because of my co worker with the Galaxy S 2 is running circles around me in Quadrant unrooted and its pissing me off. Any suggestions? Help me out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am in the same boat Bro, and guess what. I am also on Hboot 1.5... I am using InfectedROM Eternity with the infectedAnthrax kernel. The odd thing is with quadrant it blasts through all the test with ease except for the 2 & 3d tests. Once it gets to the graphical side of quadrant I can actually see it skipping and jittering all over the place! On the brighter side, the rom and kernel seem to run awesome. So I dunno?
I know! It's not that big of a deal.. lol Just wondering if there is a problem since the scores are unusually low. Thats all...
Jrex said:
I am in the same boat Bro, and guess what. I am also on Hboot 1.5... I am using InfectedROM Eternity with the infectedAnthrax kernel. The odd thing is with quadrant it blasts through all the test with ease except for the 2 & 3d tests. Once it gets to the graphical side of quadrant I can actually see it skipping and jittering all over the place! On the brighter side, the rom and kernel seem to run awesome. So I dunno?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea! Sounds pretty similar... On the 2d test I get about 5 FPS every time an the others vary.. Seems to be getting like 60FPS on the rest of the tests.. An the CPU an Memory tests are different every time as well.. Sometimes it blasts through them.. Other times it just crawls... So annoying!
Flash cm7...
My wife hates XDA
Flash the stock kernel and see if it goes up to 1900-2000.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Anthax kernal causes it with my phone. Stock kernal, infected 1.3 i get around 3000 on quads.
Sent from my PG86100 using XDA Premium App
Only thing I think is funny is that the tmobile gs2 has the same processor as us but benches like it has an exynos. Samsung must have added epicsawse
IF you have multiple CPU mamagement program running (setcpu, cpu mater, system tuner etc..), try only keep one and uninstall the others.
I've never gotten that low, but honestly, on some of the tweaked up "fancy pants" ROM's my Quadrants (and all benchmarks for that matter) were really bad particularly on graphics. I'm running CleanROM 2.8 right now OC'd to 1.7 Ghz max, 384 min, and I get 3300+ Quadrants and on Antutu Benchmark, I beat the Galaxy S2 every time: I get around 6100 on Antutu.
So I think... try a better (more stable) ROM.
Mike
I am on infected Rom Eternity and I have had some really poor quadrants as well. I do not beieve this is a ROM issue so much as a kernel issue, because I flash a new kernel and it runs great. Ive gotten 4500+ quadrants using Eternity (1.4.1) with the Ziggy Dual Core kernal OC's at 1.8.
Even with ZIggy kernal though I have experienced some issues if it is right off of a fresh flash. I went into recovery and wiped cache and dalvik several times, and the problem was solved.
As for the person saying that they were using one of the anthrax kernals....the anthrax kernal forum says that some phones experience issues on quadrant. My phone had some low quads using both mild anthrax and infected anthrax, but never as low as 800. Typically a low quadrant I would get was around 1500.
At any rate, try to wipe cache/dalvik a few times. If it doesnt work, I would suspect it is the anthrax kernal. good luck.

I know everyone loves ICS but GB is faster

Truly is ICS better than Gingerbread in real life [on the EVO 3D]? I find myself flashing multiple ICS roms hoping to gain the smoothness of GB but I just can't find it.
I know the features ICS brings are great:
- Chrome support
- Better sleep management
- Better system/data management (cant confirm this)
- 32 bit color by default (cant confirm this)
** http://www.android.com/about/ice-cream-sandwich/
But one thing GB has that ICS doesn't is complete capability with our phones. We were able to make GB fly and I feel since Sprint is dragging their feet to release the update, we will have some time before ICS flies like GB. By then Jelly Bean will be running. It's a vicious cycle.
I am all for trying out new software, I love being on the bleeding edge of technology. However, for example, when playing Max Payne on ICS, the joystick would stop responding or the framerate will drop dramatically. That never happened on GB.
So my question is, whats your reason for running ICS on your EVO 3D? It is because its the latest and greatest or is there a certain feature I am missing? Because I am starting not to see a benefit.
**Disclamer: I read a couple of threads related to this but this subject was never expanded on. Mods feel free to close if you think this is redundant.**
I run it because I'm yet to have 1 problem that's not a known ics general issue.
Sent from my Evo 3D on Sprint's blazing fast 3G network with 4G coverage everywhere
For cdma phones yes, the 2.17 base was an excelent base for GB roms. Us poor GSM users had a crap base which when even overclocked was probably still slower than the current ICS.. for example low 2000 quadrants and 24fps nenamark
I just wish there was a way to use the 2.17 base roms on GSM, I would certainly use it. :good:
ICS runs fine on my phone. And I'm easily getting at least 24 hours per battery, as opposed to 12 hours with GB.
ICS definitely has better battery management. However, for me personally, I don't mind having less battery with more performance since I have multiple batteries I can just swap out. A perfect balance is what I look to achieve. ICS beats GB in terms of battery life but I have to give the best performance title to GB.
Wait until HTC release the kernel sources and we get custom overclocked kernels, will speed it up a little
00mpollard said:
Wait until HTC release the kernel sources and we get custom overclocked kernels, will speed it up a little
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering they haven't yet, what makes you think they will?
edufur said:
Considering they haven't yet, what makes you think they will?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There hasn't been an official ICS release? (For CDMA at least). Generally its been a 90 day or so time frame for source release. We should see GSM source in the next couple of months. While HTC isn't the fastest at releasing they haven't ever failed to release source that I'm aware of.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Disagree with this post 100%.
Even though im running a GSM version, i can tell you right now that the phone is 100% different then the GB version. Its faster, smoother, and runs far more efficient. (ive only got 200 mb used of ram, when my GB version was running around 400-450, and i still have to remove junk from my ICS version once i root it.)
js593 said:
Disagree with this post 100%.
Even though im running a GSM version, i can tell you right now that the phone is 100% different then the GB version. Its faster, smoother, and runs far more efficient. (ive only got 200 mb used of ram, when my GB version was running around 400-450, and i still have to remove junk from my ICS version once i root it.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again this is for the GSM version, it may not be true for CDMA phones as i doubt you have one to compare...
I myself believe the fact that their phones run worse on ICS then ours because the same thing was happening to us on GB...
I think for me gb gave me problems with youtube....always skipping in the middle. But going to ics has fixed that. Everything is smoother. Battery life to me isn't much of a problem since I have about two extra batteries.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
ICS runs way better than GB did. side by side comparisons of Eternity 1.4.2 vs inbREDed 5.2 verify that for me in an instant.
apps load faster, menus react quicker, etc. I'll never go back to GB and can't wait for an Anthrax kernel for this.
I do wish that the Sense 4 ROM's had 3D and 4G though, because those things run really, really nice.. *sigh*
Interesting feedback, thank you everyone. This is definitely "food for thought".
Whats your feedback on game performance? I usually find myself playing one of the Rockstar or Gameloft games I have purchased and I feel ICS framerates drops much more than GBs.
I feel that since GB's kernel source has been released, devs were able to tweak it for maximum performance under heavy load vs a stock kernel which would be somewhat conservative on performance.
And yes I do have a CDMA version but input from GSM users are welcomed.
Hate to be the one to say it but the second our devices are graced with JB performance and battery life will not just reach the best balance yet, but take both to new levels.
Were in developmental limbo right now, and shortly enough new JB roms will start pumping out, keeping users happy for quite a while
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
xblackvalorx said:
Hate to be the one to say it but the second our devices are graced with JB performance and battery life will not just reach the best balance yet, but take both to new levels.
Were in developmental limbo right now, and shortly enough new JB roms will start pumping out, keeping users happy for quite a while
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everyone will jump on JB. I know I won't. I have good 4G coverage and want to keep that, especially since my speeds have been going up. and I want to keep 3D. So if those aren't present I'm staying on ICS
I really wish we had a stable build of CM7 for CDMA to play with, htc holding the source on ICS kernels has made the ICS dev basically come to a crawl and it saddens me lol... My old Evo4G had a new ROM out everyday it seemed and IMO CM9 was more stable there than on the 3D. Nothing against the wonderful devs here as it's not their fault htc is being stingy with source.
Comments Withdrawn
felacio said:
Not everyone will jump on JB. I know I won't. I have good 4G coverage and want to keep that, especially since my speeds have been going up. and I want to keep 3D. So if those aren't present I'm staying on ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many who use cm9 will lol
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
Do not compair roms just on benchmarks... ICS is waaaayy better than gb even without overclocking. Solo many more features in ICS made it impossible for me to go back to GB
Sent from my PG86100 using xda premium
I don't actually have an evo, but I've been using an HTC hd2 for a long time, until yesterday.
I was running the latest ics version mostly just to be on the bleeding edge of technology. Their were a few things I really liked more and reasons I wanted to run it because of, but mostly i wanted ics because it was new.
We also had gingerbread roms that were blazing fast and worked almost perfectly. In all honesty they were amazing.
Then ics came along. Many of the drivers were not there for our device and the devs start working like crazy to fix them or write them, just whatever needed to be done.
However even to this day ics does not run as well as gb did. It is very stable, not a lot of fc's but it still has some. In reality its just not yet the same quality gb was.
I think that until HTC releases the kernal source like for the evo and other phones that ics will not run as good as gb. In no way is this in offense to the devs. I just know that its hard to match a companies time and man power when your doing something for free.
In short, unless their is a lot of official support I do not think ics runs as well as gb either.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

[Q] aosp + benchmarking

First off, let me say that this is more a question out of curiosity so I can learn more about the android system then real concern.
That having been said, I have noticed that AOSP roms consistently score lower on benchmark software (Antutu to be exact) then Sense based roms, even though its immediately obvious that the AOSP roms are faster in the "real world". I have read on another phone's forum that it was OpenGL based for that phone, is it the same thing for our Rezounds, or are there other factors at work?
I do realize that benchmark scores are not the end all for performance representation, however the fact remains that there has to be something that is bringing down the AOSP score, hence why this is a question of curiosity .
That is an observation I have not made. The scores are pretty much the same for me. Just ran a 6336 on Antutu. Without overclocking, I run about the same on Sense.
I just had to rerun to make sure I wasn't making an a** of myself....
Both runs were using Neo's roms (adrenaline and rage)
on adrenaline with dsb's kernel and no OC I got a 7125
on rage running the bundled kernel i got a 6577
I've never seen over 7k on this phone without some heavy overclocking. What version of dsb's kernel are you using? A lot of them don't hold stable clocks. Try a benchmark with the stock kernel. It's a much more fair test since the AOSP is basically stock.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I was running his 2.01 kernel with 192 min and 1.5 max using smartassv2 gov for the posted score.
Will have to get back to you on the stock kernel numbers as I am currently back on AOSP since I am playing around with themeing it, however for what it's worth this phone consistently (10-12 different benchmark runs) scored between 7000 and 7200 on the dsb kernel.
Yup I got over 8200 with my friends class 10 card in... With the standard one I get just under 7800 with OC and around 7200 without on DSBs kernel on 2 different roms...
Does anyone even use geekbench?
Yourfate said:
First off, let me say that this is more a question out of curiosity so I can learn more about the android system then real concern.
That having been said, I have noticed that AOSP roms consistently score lower on benchmark software (Antutu to be exact) then Sense based roms, even though its immediately obvious that the AOSP roms are faster in the "real world". I have read on another phone's forum that it was OpenGL based for that phone, is it the same thing for our Rezounds, or are there other factors at work?
I do realize that benchmark scores are not the end all for performance representation, however the fact remains that there has to be something that is bringing down the AOSP score, hence why this is a question of curiosity .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well Rezound is built for sense so you can expect it to be, but once we get a working OC kernel you will see asop jump up in benchmarks
In Antutu, I get around 6500 with "stock" based Sense 3.6 roms. Then Sense 4 came out and the Antutu scores are 1000 higher, my top was 7700. I don't know why Sense 4 runs so much faster, especially since it was ported to our phone. AOSP I think scores were in between, 7000 range? But I'm not certain. Anyway Sense 4 is blisteringly fast, Sense 3.6 is garbage, and AOSP roms are the fastest going between apps/launcher. Once AOSP gets more solid, I will probably switch full time, but ViperREZ Sense 4 has sooooooo many features (and speed) it is hard to put down.

What is YOUR best ROM for gaming?

NOTE: This is not the usual "what is the best ROM?" thread. This is a collection of personal opinions of gamers like myself to find out what current ROM works best for you and is not based on just a benchmark number. Please include your reason why and any relevant information that you would like to include.
Viper 3D
I am not absolutely sure, but when I experimented with Viper 3D ROM from Team Venom (here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1991150 ), when I was reading through the thread, I saw someone said that it is the best ROM in case of gaming performance. Compared with Galaxy S3 than on Evo he had better results in FPS than on S3. So I don't know if this will help you somehow, but you should give it a try.
Can't say for sure either, but I've been trying a couple of Roms. More than the Rom, the Kernel seems to make a difference for Games.
Anyhow, I found to get really good results with the Sensai Rom when I use the Buttered Toast Kernel @1566mhz. You can save your battery and not overclock the GPU as that really didn't ever result in much performance increase.
I believe I had the best experience with the infamous Anthrax Kernel, though it was also draining battery like a hog and wouldn't run quite as stable as the Buttered Toast Kernel does. Either way, I'd say mostly stick to the Rom you like in terms of Featureset and try switching through Kernels, that's what mostly game me the biggest performance gains. (My personal favourite: Buttered Toast)

Categories

Resources