Integrating a kernel - HTC Amaze 4G

Quick question i am using a custom rom and I have to flash a kernel to get my wifi working. Is their a way to flash it into the rom so i don't have to flash it every time i do a wipe. Sort of out box tweak

We can't flash kernels by recovery so you shouldn't have to worry about having to reflash the same kernel over again.
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using xda premium

Binary100100 said:
We can't flash kernels by recovery so you shouldn't have to worry about having to reflash the same kernel over again.
Sent from my HTC Amaze 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought so, every time i use the super wipe function and i install the rom i have to reflash the kernel to get my wifi working.

nofroyo said:
I thought so, every time i use the super wipe function and i install the rom i have to reflash the kernel to get my wifi working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because the kernel modules are different than the rom modules.

So which kernel is best to use that will work on all amaze roms ? One that will wrk with all if possible
Also roms that have stock kernel should wrk with all amazes right?

nofroyo said:
So which kernel is best to use that will work on all amaze roms ? One that will wrk with all if possible
Also roms that have stock kernel should wrk with all amazes right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You only have a few to chose from.
You have the stock and you have Faux123 kernel.
You may need to use the computer to flash the Faux123 kernel since the Flash Image GUI app doesn't always properly flash the modules.

Using command prompt or terminal right?
One last question if I flash using terminal will that allow me to switch roms and not have to keep on reflashing the kernel everytime ?
Thanks for all your help it's much appreciated

nofroyo said:
Using command prompt or terminal right?
One last question if I flash using terminal will that allow me to switch roms and not have to keep on reflashing the kernel everytime ?
Thanks for all your help it's much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's suggested to use the Easy Kernel Flasher if it's a dedicated kernel.
If you're trying to flash the kernel that came with the rom then you can use the Flash Image GUI app on the Market.
I actually just composed an even easier kernel flasher for Faux123's latest kernel.
If you want to try it?
All you should need to do is double click, plug your phone in and click Install.
Let me know if it works or not should you decide to try it.
Faux123 Easier Kernel Updater Executable

I am going to try it right now.
Binary100100 said:
It's suggested to use the Easy Kernel Flasher if it's a dedicated kernel.
If you're trying to flash the kernel that came with the rom then you can use the Flash Image GUI app on the Market.
I actually just composed an even easier kernel flasher for Faux123's latest kernel.
If you want to try it?
All you should need to do is double click, plug your phone in and click Install.
Let me know if it works or not should you decide to try it.
Faux123 Easier Kernel Updater Executable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

nofroyo said:
I am going to try it right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay just let me know how well it works for you.
You're a tester.

Binary100100 said:
It's suggested to use the Easy Kernel Flasher if it's a dedicated kernel.
If you're trying to flash the kernel that came with the rom then you can use the Flash Image GUI app on the Market.
I actually just composed an even easier kernel flasher for Faux123's latest kernel.
If you want to try it?
All you should need to do is double click, plug your phone in and click Install.
Let me know if it works or not should you decide to try it.
Faux123 Easier Kernel Updater Executable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it works perfectly, just plugged in and it did all the work. i rebooted and wifi is working as usual. good job.
hopefully i wont have to reflash the kernel every time i need to wipe haha

nofroyo said:
it works perfectly, just plugged in and it did all the work. i rebooted and wifi is working as usual. good job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the update. I don't think that I can set it up any easier.

Binary100100 said:
Thanks for the update. I don't think that I can set it up any easier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries if you need to test anything else i am willing to test

Binary100100 said:
You only have a few to chose from.
You have the stock and you have Faux123 kernel.
You may need to use the computer to flash the Faux123 kernel since the Flash Image GUI app doesn't always properly flash the modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't heard of this issue or bug report yet from the over 6k active users of the application. I'm all for fixing the issue but I can't afford to buy all android devices to test with so I rely heavily on users reporting issues and a few knowlegdable testers!
Can you provide an example where Flash Image GUI doesn't properly flash the modules? A link to the .zip file would be most helpful along with the specific module/modules which didn't properly load?
nofroyo said:
So which kernel is best to use that will work on all amaze roms ? One that will wrk with all if possible
Also roms that have stock kernel should wrk with all amazes right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been answering this exact question on the EVO 3D boards since HTC released their unlock method back in August. The best answer I've been able to formulate, and feel free to critique or post additional questions is as follows:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=18793336&postcount=2
The WiFi error is caused by a mismatch between the WiFi module and the currently loaded kernel. The WiFi module is stored in /system/lib/modules/bcm4330.ko (bcm4329.ko is for EVO 3D) . The kernel is stored in the boot partition.
When booted into the custom recovery through the traditional methods, reboot recovery, bootloader -> recovery, etc., HTC unlock method does not unlock *kernel* write access but does unlock *system* write access.
The result is the kernel module for WiFi is loaded but the kernel itself is not loaded. This creates a mismatch between a WiFi module loaded from the ROM and the matching kernel not being loaded as HTC does not allow it to be loaded from the traditional recovery boot method.
The main issue around kernel write access is due to the HTC unlock method only allowing kernel write access in two modes:
1) Booted in normal Android mode. My application, Flash Image GUI, will flash any kernel .zip file with the HTC unlock method because it runs in normal android mode. HTC unlocks write access to the boot partition, where the kernel is stored, in normal Android mode. Flash Image GUI also properly loads the respective WiFi modules essentially eliminating this WiFi mismatch error.
2) Fastboot booted into the custom recovery using the following command: fastboot boot c:\android\cwm-recovery.img. HTC unlock method allows kernel write access while using fastboot boot of a custom recovery.
Hope that helps!
Edit: If you're curious and want to do some reading on previous WiFi error issues with the EVO 3D on this Q&A board where I replied, here are some similar posts:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=17681402
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16990247
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18624865
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1265467
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18807723
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In summary, there is no WiFi module which will work across all kernels as the WiFi module is compiled at the same time the kernel is compiled and are required to be used together as a pair.
Hope that helps clarify!

joeykrim said:
I haven't heard of this issue or bug report yet from the over 6k active users of the application. I'm all for fixing the issue but I can't afford to buy all android devices to test with so I rely heavily on users reporting issues and a few knowlegdable testers!
Can you provide an example where Flash Image GUI doesn't properly flash the modules? A link to the .zip file would be most helpful along with the specific module/modules which didn't properly load?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed the issue while applying the Faux123 kernel with the Energy ROM
It's likely because it's not set up to be flashed by recovery but by a computer script.
The directory of the kernel flashing script directory goes like this
Amaze-EKF-008b13-sense
-Kernel-Here
---boot.img
-Modules
---system
-----etc
--------init.post_boot.sh
--------st_drv.ko
--------thermald.conf
--------ti_hci_drv.ko
-----lib
--------modules
-----------kineto_gan.ko
-----------tiap_drv.ko
-----------tiwlan_drv.ko

joeykrim said:
I haven't heard of this issue or bug report yet from the over 6k active users of the application. I'm all for fixing the issue but I can't afford to buy all android devices to test with so I rely heavily on users reporting issues and a few knowlegdable testers!
Can you provide an example where Flash Image GUI doesn't properly flash the modules? A link to the .zip file would be most helpful along with the specific module/modules which didn't properly load?
I've been answering this exact question on the EVO 3D boards since HTC released their unlock method back in August. The best answer I've been able to formulate, and feel free to critique or post additional questions is as follows:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=18793336&postcount=2
In summary, there is no WiFi module which will work across all kernels as the WiFi module is compiled at the same time the kernel is compiled and are required to be used together as a pair.
Hope that helps clarify!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once again thanks for this information it clearly answers my questions I had. The app you made solved my initial inquiry and works perfectly. Thanks for all you help and support :=)

Binary100100 said:
I noticed the issue while applying the Faux123 kernel with the Energy ROM
It's likely because it's not set up to be flashed by recovery but by a computer script.
The directory of the kernel flashing script directory goes like this
Amaze-EKF-008b13-sense
-Kernel-Here
---boot.img
-Modules
---system
-----etc
--------init.post_boot.sh
--------st_drv.ko
--------thermald.conf
--------ti_hci_drv.ko
-----lib
--------modules
-----------kineto_gan.ko
-----------tiap_drv.ko
-----------tiwlan_drv.ko
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, definitely not designed to be flashed by the recovery. They're using unique scripts which could easily be modified to follow the same standards as required by a recovery .zip. In fact, it is very easy to package up one .zip file which will do both, be flashable in recovery but also contain all the files and scripts to be flashable from a desktop via adb/fastboot.
Appreciate the link and info. Made it very easy to narrow down the issue!
Will definitely keep this in mind. Good to see/know there are some unique kernel .zip files be distributed which don't follow the "standards".
nofroyo said:
Once again thanks for this information it clearly answers my questions I had. The app you made solved my initial inquiry and works perfectly. Thanks for all you help and support :=)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad the information helped and appreciate the feedback!

Related

[Q] CWM Loses Convenience

I'm not really sure I understand and maybe someone can help me to, but the appeal of CWM to me was the ability to flash a ROM without needing a PC. However, most of the ROM's in the dev section say that a kernel flash is required and the utility requires a PC. The appeal of being able to flash a new ROM at any time is lost since I need to wait until I'm at home with my PC. If a kernel flash at the PC is required for most ROM's then why CWM at that point?
I'm realizing as I write this that the answer is likely that it's easier for a noob than adb. I still ask the question in the event there is something else I'm missing.
Also, before I get 30 hypersensitive replies about not appreciating the devs work and I should dev something myself if I don't like it please know that this is not intended to criticize the work of the devs. I'd just like to know if there is something I'm missing or maybe that I'm misunderstanding that a kernel flash is required when I read the releases.
BialyMurzyn said:
I'm not really sure I understand and maybe someone can help me to, but the appeal of CWM to me was the ability to flash a ROM without needing a PC. However, most of the ROM's in the dev section say that a kernel flash is required and the utility requires a PC. The appeal of being able to flash a new ROM at any time is lost since I need to wait until I'm at home with my PC. If a kernel flash at the PC is required for most ROM's then why CWM at that point?
I'm realizing as I write this that the answer is likely that it's easier for a noob than adb. I still ask the question in the event there is something else I'm missing.
Also, before I get 30 hypersensitive replies about not appreciating the devs work and I should dev something myself if I don't like it please know that this is not intended to criticize the work of the devs. I'd just like to know if there is something I'm missing or maybe that I'm misunderstanding that a kernel flash is required when I read the releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! You missed this thread
All the latest roms are using Faux kernel anyways, Flash once, and then you can use CWM to flash any multiple roms you want
The ONLY time you NEED to flash a seperate kernel is when going to a totally different build. Examples:
Sense 3.0 to Sense 3.5
Sense 3.5 to Sense 3.0
ICS to Sense 3.0
ICS to Sense 3.5
Sense 3.0 to ICS
ICS to Sense 3.5
...etc
Other than that the kernel that you use is still pretty much stock.
rbaruch said:
All the latest roms are using Faux kernel anyways, Flash once, and then you can use CWM to flash any multiple roms you want
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true, but each successive release says that a kernel update is needed. I am assuming that this includes not only those freshly flashing the ROM, but also those flashing from a ROM's previous version. Are they incompatible from version to version? Basically, if I'm bored while out and wanted to flash a ROM then flash the kernel later are there risks?
antiquezip said:
Yes! You missed this thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This looks great! Since T-Mobile just throttled my data for the remainder of my billing cycle I will have to follow the thread and then give it a try later when I have WiFi. Thanks for the link.
Thanks Binary. That makes sense. No pun intended. So then the boot.img a dev includes with the packaged ROM is more or less a suggested kernel to best optimize their ROM and not that there are features of a ROM that will not work?
BialyMurzyn said:
Thanks Binary. That makes sense. No pun intended. So then the boot.img a dev includes with the packaged ROM is more or less a suggested kernel to best optimize their ROM and not that there are features of a ROM that will not work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends on the kernel that the developer includes.
If it's a faux edition then there are a few tweaks however it's still stock.
All features should be accessable in the rom as long as you are using an unsecured kernel.

TWRP 2.4

I was just curious if anyone was planning on building TRWP 2.4 for the fassy since its not yet supported by their team.? Or does it still not play nice with the fassy?
BDogg718 said:
I was just curious if anyone was planning on building TRWP 2.4 for the fassy since its not yet supported by their team.? Or does it still not play nice with the fassy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd love to see it on the fascinate! I'm rolling with it on my a500 and its freaking awesome
I am going to be receiving a fascinate tomorrow and have plans to install cm10.1 via odin. From my understanding I can then install twrp and goo to install updates from that point on. I presume I have to still use odin to unlock the phone and get CM10.1 working, but goo/twrp should work for updating it from the nightlys after that point, correct?
http://teamw.in/project/twrp2/40
Xceptiona1noob said:
I am going to be receiving a fascinate tomorrow and have plans to install cm10.1 via odin. From my understanding I can then install twrp and goo to install updates from that point on. I presume I have to still use odin to unlock the phone and get CM10.1 working, but goo/twrp should work for updating it from the nightlys after that point, correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't have to unlock the fascinate its all open just put cwm on it and flash cm10.1 twrp won't work on cm10 and above so you have to use cwm use this guide here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1238070
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Xceptiona1noob said:
I am going to be receiving a fascinate tomorrow and have plans to install cm10.1 via odin. From my understanding I can then install twrp and goo to install updates from that point on. I presume I have to still use odin to unlock the phone and get CM10.1 working, but goo/twrp should work for updating it from the nightlys after that point, correct?
http://teamw.in/project/twrp2/40
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm10 includes it's own "cmupdater" app. Checks for new builds on your schedule (or manually), notifies of new builds, displays change logs, and installs the updates. Works well. It's visible on the "about phone" settings menu. Also available in the app drawer...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
I've fixed twrp to work with cm10.1. Works pretty well. Too bad injection doesn't work any more.
jt1134 said:
I've fixed twrp to work with cm10.1. Works pretty well. Too bad injection doesn't work any more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice I've never used twrp so I may have to try it
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Linked below is a kernel bundled with the latest version of TWRP modified to work with the fascinate. I've only tested it with my personal cm10.1 build, it should work with other 4.2.2 ROMs, may work with 4.2.1 ROMs. Due to the way the bootloader handles the kernel/recovery partitions, it (currently) has to be bundled with the kernel. If I come up with a way to make it stick across different builds I'll submit the changes to the appropriate upstream repositories, etc.
I haven't tested much other than flashing zip files, backup/restore may break your device into a million pieces. That might be kinda funny.
Updated source code is here:
https://github.com/jt1134/Team-Win-Recovery-Project/commits/twrp2.4
https://github.com/jt1134/android_device_samsung_fascinatemtd/commits/myjb-next
http://www.mediafire.com/?ul4n2gc1ba044sb
jt1134 said:
Linked below is a kernel bundled with the latest version of TWRP modified to work with the fascinate. I've only tested it with my personal cm10.1 build, it should work with other 4.2.2 ROMs, may work with 4.2.1 ROMs. Due to the way the bootloader handles the kernel/recovery partitions, it (currently) has to be bundled with the kernel. If I come up with a way to make it stick across different builds I'll submit the changes to the appropriate upstream repositories, etc.
I haven't tested much other than flashing zip files, backup/restore may break your device into a million pieces. That might be kinda funny.
Updated source code is here:
https://github.com/jt1134/Team-Win-Recovery-Project/commits/twrp2.4
https://github.com/jt1134/android_device_samsung_fascinatemtd/commits/myjb-next
http://www.mediafire.com/?ul4n2gc1ba044sb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx JT! Back-up and restore work just fine! Great work as always!
BDogg718 said:
Thanx JT! Back-up and restore work just fine! Great work as always!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know. Thanks for testing it
jt1134 said:
Linked below is a kernel bundled with the latest version of TWRP modified to work with the fascinate. I've only tested it with my personal cm10.1 build, it should work with other 4.2.2 ROMs, may work with 4.2.1 ROMs. Due to the way the bootloader handles the kernel/recovery partitions, it (currently) has to be bundled with the kernel. If I come up with a way to make it stick across different builds I'll submit the changes to the appropriate upstream repositories, etc.
I haven't tested much other than flashing zip files, backup/restore may break your device into a million pieces. That might be kinda funny.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And it does work on the latest hellybean as long as you 1st flash your cm kernel to it :thumbup:
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
hhp_211 said:
And it does work on the latest hellybean as long as you 1st flash your cm kernel to it :thumbup:
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd love to see this incorporated into the devil kernel
Seems my changes have been merged in the main TWRP repository
I still can't seem to come up with a decent way to replace the recovery permanently from kernel to kernel, but I've fixed fakeflash to work with the current version of TWRP. Fakeflash allows you to temporarily flash a different recovery by flashing a zip file in your current recovery. This allows it to work regardless of what kernel/recovery you are currently using.
A test version is linked below. Flash it in your current recovery and it will reboot into TWRP. Subsequent reboots will run your previous recovery, the zip needs to be flashed each time to use TWRP. Anyone who has had the fascinate for more than a year and a half should know all about fakeflash it's the original way we used recovery (**** you samsung).
http://www.mediafire.com/?tq0uq2uo24lofcl
Thanks jt. It`s a step forward. You da man that's all I can say. :thumbup::beer:
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
if you are on fassy, notta posted a pa twp recovery flashable test as of now
LasVegasRomeo said:
if you are on fassy, notta posted a pa twp recovery flashable test as of now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does that kernel notta posted kill your WiFi?
kill type ?my wifi is workin I havent had any issues as far as i know. ran wifi a lil bit earlier and no issues. My wifi has is always crappy for me though here at home. Seems spotty a lil but like i said thats normal for me.
jt1134 said:
Seems my changes have been merged in the main TWRP repository
I still can't seem to come up with a decent way to replace the recovery permanently from kernel to kernel, but I've fixed fakeflash to work with the current version of TWRP. Fakeflash allows you to temporarily flash a different recovery by flashing a zip file in your current recovery. This allows it to work regardless of what kernel/recovery you are currently using.
A test version is linked below. Flash it in your current recovery and it will reboot into TWRP. Subsequent reboots will run your previous recovery, the zip needs to be flashed each time to use TWRP. Anyone who has had the fascinate for more than a year and a half should know all about fakeflash it's the original way we used recovery (**** you samsung).
http://www.mediafire.com/?tq0uq2uo24lofcl
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there a way to modify the source to use the prebuilt bootimage.Also when compiling it fails to create the utilities folder.

Some questions. And concerns

Good morning/evening
Running a htc one x+ from telus
Wanted to know few thins before I flash a custom rom
1) the normal recovery that I installed through toolkit is it Ok to use to flash rom or do I need to get twrp since the developer lists it to be used while flashing? So is it mandatory or not?
2) does the kernel come with the ROM in the zip or is there a separate kernel for each ROM or can you use any kernel listed under the type (so for me its telus). I'm asking cause I would like to use a battery efficient kernel
3) what ROM or kernel is battery efficient I'm asking this cause I'm coming from Motorola droid max and I was on that phone for battery basically so hence that is my top priority over all things.
Thanks for your replies and time in advance. Completely new to HTC hence these specific questions
Sent from my XT910 using Tapatalk 2
Welcome aboard!
naifs_br10 said:
... Running a htc one x+ from telus
1) the normal recovery that I installed through toolkit is it Ok to use to flash rom or do I need to get twrp since the developer lists it to be used while flashing? So is it mandatory or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't use any tool kit, so I don't know what comes with, but I strongly recommend to install the latest TWRP recovery (HERE) since it is the ONLY recovery in development regularly updated and tested. Every vital options are working flawlessly, like sideload and charging to name a few.
naifs_br10 said:
2) does the kernel come with the ROM in the zip or is there a separate kernel for each ROM or can you use any kernel listed under the type (so for me its telus). I'm asking cause I would like to use a battery efficient kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is the boot.img. It is usually included in the rom.zip file. Very easy to flash via bootlaoder mode. Unfortunately, for the North American HOX+ version there are not much kernel development to date.
naifs_br10 said:
3) what ROM or kernel is battery efficient I'm asking this cause I'm coming from Motorola droid max and I was on that phone for battery basically so hence that is my top priority over all things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This can't be answered, it all depends on what you do with your phone. There are no better choices then to try as many as you can to compare them yourself based on your personal usage profile.

[KERNEL][4/11/2013]Stock/System Write Kernel 1.28

This is my first attempt at building a kernel. This is strictly a /system write kernel. In the future I may upstream and add features. I have built this from the latest source that came out (m7ul-3.4.10-jb-crc-ddcfb8c)
For 1.28 devices only!
Changelog:
Version1...4/11/13
Disabled perflock
Enable /system write
Download:
v1 - http://goo.im/devs/Flyhalf205/M7/Flyhalf205-boot-v1-m7.zip
Installation:
Download the file above
Flash .zip with TWRP Dumlock or extract boot.img from .zip
Boot into fastboot on your phone
Using a computer with fastboot comands.
fastboot flash boot boot-m7-img
Mine
Flyhalf205 said:
Mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tested, without any issue, only wifi a bit slower than stock on my M7_U version (1.29.709.4 )
Thought more people would have been wanting this type of kernel lol
On your TWRP thread it says that with HTC Dumlock, we can flash kernels while s-on.
Does that apply for this aswell?
If not, I'll have to wait a few days until I've got access to a computer again.
KidCarter93 said:
On your TWRP thread it says that with HTC Dumlock, we can flash kernels while s-on.
Does that apply for this aswell?
If not, I'll have to wait a few days until I've got access to a computer again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've updated the zip in the OP. It should flash in TWRP Dumlock. No one that I know of has tested Dumlock with this deviceso good luck. Be sure to follow the steps exactly
Flyhalf205 said:
I've updated the zip in the OP. It should flash in TWRP Dumlock. No one that I know of has tested Dumlock with this deviceso good luck. Be sure to follow the steps exactly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll give it a try when I'm back from work later and let you know how it goes
Flyhalf205 said:
This is my first attempt at building a kernel. This is strictly a /system write kernel. In the future I may upstream and add features. I have built this from the latest source that came out (m7ul-3.4.10-jb-crc-ddcfb8c)
Changelog:
Version1...4/11/13
Disabled perflock
Enable /system write
Download:
v1 - http://goo.im/devs/Flyhalf205/M7/Flyhalf205-boot-v1-m7.zip
Installation:
Download the file above
Flash .zip with TWRP Dumlock or extract boot.img from .zip
Boot into fastboot on your phone
Using a computer with fastboot comands.
fastboot flash boot boot-m7-img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Greta work mate, what exactly is this perflock? Hear a lot about it these days
mwilky said:
Greta work mate, what exactly is this perflock? Hear a lot about it these days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
perflock disables cpu frequency changes so with it off you can use setcpu etc to change frequency.
Does this work ok with any of the custom ROMs about (in using ARHD at the moment), and can we flash with CWM? It seems to flash kernels even with S-ON.
rovex said:
Does this work ok with any of the custom ROMs about (in using ARHD at the moment), and can we flash with CWM? It seems to flash kernels even with S-ON.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must flash it with a computer or using HTC dumlock which no one has tested yet.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Ok ill give it a try. I know that ARHD ROMs have a kernel built in that gets flashed in aroma with S-ON. Bit new to HTC flashing.
I'll have to look into that. That will be nice to use in this kernel on my next kernel.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
This flashed absolutely fine via Dumlock
Anyone want to give this kernel a go? http://goo.im/devs/Flyhalf205/M7/Flyhalf205-Freakazoid-v1-m7.zip Flash it with HTC Dumlock on TWRP or extract the boot and flash with a pc.
I've included a extra goodies for you guys. Not many.
Added lionheart
Wheatly
Hyper
Dancedance
Noop
Sio
Fiops
Maybe more but all I can remember.
Flyhalf205 said:
Anyone want to give this kernel a go? http://goo.im/devs/Flyhalf205/M7/Flyhalf205-Freakazoid-v1-m7.zip Flash it with HTC Dumlock on TWRP or extract the boot and flash with a pc.
I've included a extra goodies for you guys. Not many.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog please
m3dd0g said:
Changelog please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added changelog. Two post up.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I'm running this kernel on Trickdroid 3.0.1, flashed with Dumlock fine. However I have no in-call sound through the earpiece. If I enable speakerphone I can hear everything fine, and it works through BT, just not through phone earpiece
Dunc001 said:
I'm running this kernel on Trickdroid 3.0.1, flashed with Dumlock fine. However I have no in-call sound through the earpiece. If I enable speakerphone I can hear everything fine, and it works through BT, just not through phone earpiece
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird. What build number are you on?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Not sure if this has even been explored yet but I've read qualcomm fast charge has been disabled for the One. Can anyone confirm this and is there a kernel mod to enable this?
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda premium

Basic Information About Android Kernel

I want to start developing my own kernel but I need some basic information about Android Kernel. First thing I wonder if I flash corrupted kernel image, what would happen? Will device goes black screen and become hardware bricked or just turns on and you can see splash screen and not boot up or something like that? I'm asking this because I have Samsung device (which has Odin mode (like other Samsung devices)) and I read in several sites that saying unless you don't corrupt Odin mode partition you can do whatever you want. I really wonder if it's true.
veli.tasali said:
I want to start developing my own kernel but I need some basic information about Android Kernel. First thing I wonder if I flash corrupted kernel image, what would happen? Will device goes black screen and become hardware bricked or just turns on and you can see splash screen and not boot up or something like that? I'm asking this because I have Samsung device (which has Odin mode (like other Samsung devices)) and I read in several sites that saying unless you don't corrupt Odin mode partition you can do whatever you want. I really wonder if it's true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read this..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3429355
This will help I'm sure.
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk
spookcity138 said:
Read this..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3429355
This will help I'm sure.
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I compiled a kernel but I still have questions. Do I have to use NDK version used by kernel that I'm compiling? Why we are have to install wireless module separately? And do recovery mode work separate from kernel. These question are essential for me. Thanks you a lot.
veli.tasali said:
I compiled a kernel but I still have questions. Do I have to use NDK version used by kernel that I'm compiling? Why we are have to install wireless module separately? And do recovery mode work separate from kernel. These question are essential for me. Thanks you a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I will answer best I can .I'm no expert,but have compiled kernels for a few devices..
1. I guess you mean the NDK toolchain,either way,you do not. I don't use NDK.
2. Really depends on the kernel I think whether or not you need to add the WiFi module separately. I have never needed to,but its not hard to if you need to I don't think.
3. Also not fully sure what you mean. You will need a custom recovery ,TWRP or such to flash the kernel,but you do not need to build the recovery image with the kernel like you would with a full ROM.
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources