Related
Did anyone else know of this?
i am new to the i9100 (coming from G2x ICS build), i have noticed that the interface does not follow my fingers as closely as in the LG (or other phones).
Is this a known issue?
Thanks a million
benyben123 said:
Did anyone else know of this?
i am new to the i9100 (coming from G2x ICS build), i have noticed that the interface does not follow my fingers as closely as in the LG (or other phones).
Is this a known issue?
Thanks a million
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well maybe in that rom but in checkrom revohd, I'm pretty sure nobody ever had laag.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
beston94 said:
Well maybe in that rom but in checkrom revohd, I'm pretty sure nobody ever had laag.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Since this is my first ICS rom, I have to check on that rom you mentioned. I am a noob. Bought this i9100 with this ROM already on it.
struggling with all the search results
Although I can't attest to it, I did see a few people complaining about touch lag in both XXLPB and XXLPH. They're both leaks after all, and not official yet. You'll want to wait for a while till kernel sources or an official ICS ROM comes out.
CheckROM will be flawless due to it being based on a Gingerbread ROM, and any other GB ROMs for that matter (I used CheckROM and its pretty responsive). If you want, you can switch to them temporarily until a better ICS alternative comes, or stay there and wait for a better one.
AShadowX said:
Although I can't attest to it, I did see a few people complaining about touch lag in both XXLPB and XXLPH. They're both leaks after all, and not official yet. You'll want to wait for a while till kernel sources or an official ICS ROM comes out.
CheckROM will be flawless due to it being based on a Gingerbread ROM, and any other GB ROMs for that matter (I used CheckROM and its pretty responsive). If you want, you can switch to them temporarily until a better ICS alternative comes, or stay there and wait for a better one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW many thanks for that answer !!!!!!!!
On cm9 you can change touch sensivity, just in case if you want to go back to cm9
Sent from my sgs2 running cm9 using xda app
Makrilli said:
On cm9 you can change touch sensivity, just in case if you want to go back to cm9
Sent from my sgs2 running cm9 using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where plz???
Why are we still using a 2.6 kernel? Isn't ICS supposed to be a 3.x kernel? What are the benefits that we are missing out on by not having a 3.x kernel? Is there any difference in performance or features? I have no idea about any of this. I am hoping that someone can shed a little light on the subject for me.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda premium
2.6.40 is 3.0
The prime is running 2.6.39 and 2.6.40 was the version that became Linux 3.0. We're just before 3.0. The big issue is that Android develops outside the Linux tree so they have to port Linux changes in to Android. That takes a while. The good news is that Android was merged in to the Linux source tree recently so they should track more closely in the future.
daryll said:
The prime is running 2.6.39 and 2.6.40 was the version that became Linux 3.0. We're just before 3.0. The big issue is that Android develops outside the Linux tree so they have to port Linux changes in to Android. That takes a while. The good news is that Android was merged in to the Linux source tree recently so they should track more closely in the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flagship nexus/4.0.1 already ran 3.0.8, so that's Nvidia fault.
Edit: I stand corrected, thanks DiamondBack.
bk201doesntexist said:
Flagship nexus/4.0.1 already ran 3.0.8, so that's Asus fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's nVidia's fault. The standard Tegra3 kernel is 2.6.39.
But anyway, we are not missing much at all.
As Gary posted Nvidia Google and Asus has a meeting this week. So at least there is hope they start pushing things forward soon It could very well be that the "gaming issues" discussed in another thread are related to the kernel as well^^ Not that i have an idea what exactly the kernel is doing but its the only explanation i could see with my limited knowledge
.21 is pretty great so far, but we're not quite there yet.
@OP ...good point.
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-6
So, what are the benefits and/or drawbacks of a 3.x kernel? Is there much difference?
Sent from my Anthrax infected 3D!
If I've helped you in any way... hit the "Thanks" button.
lyon21 said:
So, what are the benefits and/or drawbacks of a 3.x kernel? Is there much difference?
Sent from my Anthrax infected 3D!
If I've helped you in any way... hit the "Thanks" button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have some time do some reading you will learn a lot of this link:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
tylermaciaszek said:
If you have some time do some reading you will learn a lot of this link:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot man! I'll definitely have to read this.
Sent from my Anthrax infected 3D!
If I've helped you in any way... hit the "Thanks" button.
lyon21 said:
Thanks a lot man! I'll definitely have to read this.
Sent from my Anthrax infected 3D!
If I've helped you in any way... hit the "Thanks" button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still doing the reading up on it myself it sounds really promising though I have it on my G2X runs super smooth with really long battery life
CM9 will soon be using Linux 3.1+ for the TF201
dalingrin said:
CM9 will soon be using Linux 3.1+ for the TF201
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds really promising
Thank you!
There are any rumors? when the official update to the 3rd Linux kernel?
dalingrin said:
CM9 will soon be using Linux 3.1+ for the TF201
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apache incorporated the 3.1 kernel in the TF201 CM9 nightlys about 2 weeks ago (sorry - I realize you probably know this ). A lot of people were complaining about it since they were having problems, and he reverted to 2.6. I was pretty impressed with 3.1 - my wifi would occasionally drop off but the power consumption was a load better than the 2.6 kernel.
If anyone is unlocked and interested in how 3.1 runs on TF201, search back through the CM9 thread in the Development section. I am pretty sure that the 05/10 nightly uses the 3.1 kernel...
paddycr said:
Apache incorporated the 3.1 kernel in the TF201 CM9 nightlys about 2 weeks ago (sorry - I realize you probably know this ). A lot of people were complaining about it since they were having problems, and he reverted to 2.6. I was pretty impressed with 3.1 - my wifi would occasionally drop off but the power consumption was a load better than the 2.6 kernel.
If anyone is unlocked and interested in how 3.1 runs on TF201, search back through the CM9 thread in the Development section. I am pretty sure that the 05/10 nightly uses the 3.1 kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I just landed on Gummy ROM. So far its been a real treat on my prime. I might check out CM9 just for the kernel and yeah I bet battery life is much better!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Coreym said:
Unfortunately I just landed on Gummy ROM. So far its been a real treat on my prime. I might check out CM9 just for the kernel and yeah I bet battery life is much better!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the 3.2 and 3.3 kernels have made substantial ARM and Android related changes. 3.0 and 3.1 are effectively still 2.6.39 when it comes to features.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda premium
Coreym said:
Unfortunately I just landed on Gummy ROM. So far its been a real treat on my prime. I might check out CM9 just for the kernel and yeah I bet battery life is much better!
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gummy is sweet - I really liked it before I went back to my personal favorite - Eos Cornerstone nightlys. I used CM9 for several weeks but moved away from it when Gummy appeared. I will go back to it at some point - they're definitely pushing things in terms of development like using the 3.x kernel, getting the dongle working on a non-stock rom etc
Actually 3.x kernel has no essential features that must be implemented to Prime. I can count some I treat really useful: memory management changes, driver for Tegra AES hardware (will affect SSL and VPN performance, I think), maybe some changes in networking. Nothing we can't live without
Am I right?
Other Device with Android ICS and kernel 3+, work more smoother then with kernel 2,6.
And Google add Kernel 3 to Galaxy Nexus. If there is no more changes? why they do it?
But what about rumors. Asus Doing Kernel 3+ for Prime or We never get it?
Honestly I don't need more smoothness to my Prime and I even didn't overclock the processor yet.
Let Google experiment with Nexus, I need more stable software. There's enough bugs in the Prime, I don't need any more. Of course I'll try custom ROM with the new kernel, but only if it bring something really useful.
Hello
Ive been fighting for the last 2 months on new firmware for att version of galaxy note ice cream sandwitch.
What Samsung has told me there isn't any date coming out its the same thing over and over.
Im going to contiue to fight this battle until they punch the firmware out in the us
I like note i might as well root the device
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
You gotta fight!!!!! ....for your righttt!!!!! ......to UPDATEEEEE!!!. . Its cool man just relax, root your phone and flash one of the many amazing ROMs the devs have cooked up for us. Trust me when I tell you... you won't be missing the official update
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
On the rom in my sig and I will NOT be flashing the official POS update. They can keep it. This rom blows the official bloated ICS away. Already have premium suite too.
Quit your fight. You're wasting time.
Sent from my Galaxy Note SGH-I717 running Team Perfection's ICS Objection RC3 ROM.
Uhm. That's not entirely true. The offical ICS isn't useless. If it's release, so will the source. That means better cooked roms as well as OC kernels.
Kraize said:
Uhm. That's not entirely true. The offical ICS isn't useless. If it's release, so will the source. That means better cooked roms as well as OC kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldnt of said it better
I'm just waiting for the official release. I think it well be soon enough, don't worry. Like stated above. Once out i would let it settle into the dev section for a week or two to mature, then flash a custom ROM based off the official ics. Of course i would be running the official ics for a little bit until the custom roms mature. Just my own plan.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
its true, the official update is useless to me. but when the official one comes out, so does the source. and with it comes better roms from devs but also, and more importantly to me.... OC kernal... i need that, i tried those ics roms that are out now, they're all great, but its too slow... If you ever download torrentz, you know what im talking about. If im running Adownloader to download a torrent, i cant watch a video at the same time at 1.5 ghz. but at 1.83, i can.
mottyengel said:
its true, the official update is useless to me. but when the official one comes out, so does the source. and with it comes better roms from devs but also, and more importantly to me.... OC kernal... i need that, i tried those ics roms that are out now, they're all great, but its too slow... If you ever download torrentz, you know what im talking about. If im running Adownloader to download a torrent, i cant watch a video at the same time at 1.5 ghz. but at 1.83, i can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even realise that not even one year ago, a good android phone had only one processor running at around 1Ghz.
Yayodroid said:
I'm just waiting for the official release. I think it well be soon enough, don't worry. Like stated above. Once out i would let it settle into the dev section for a week or two to mature, then flash a custom ROM based off the official ics. Of course i would be running the official ics for a little bit until the custom roms mature. Just my own plan.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why wait? There are a couple that are remarkably mature and stable now. My daily driver is CM9. I'm tempted to try the Hybrid. Anything made by or if he is involved FJ is a quality product. Screw the official update crap. They can keep it. All I want is the official source released, then, well, the sky is the limit.
ive been waiting for official since i bought this thing..two days ago i said f%$k it...20 minutes later i was rooted and ROMed..i flashed ICS Objection..and i love it ... its so smooth and clean!!!
mark1s said:
Do you even realise that not even one year ago, a good android phone had only one processor running at around 1Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lies. A year ago my atrix sported a dual core T2, which I'm finding is quite superior to this scorpion crap we have.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
erick161 said:
Lies. A year ago my atrix sported a dual core T2, which I'm finding is quite superior to this scorpion crap we have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He said GOOD Android phone
you should get a PC instead
mottyengel said:
its true, the official update is useless to me. but when the official one comes out, so does the source. and with it comes better roms from devs but also, and more importantly to me.... OC kernal... i need that, i tried those ics roms that are out now, they're all great, but its too slow... If you ever download torrentz, you know what im talking about. If im running Adownloader to download a torrent, i cant watch a video at the same time at 1.5 ghz. but at 1.83, i can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't give a piss about OCing. Anyone calling ics slow hasn't flashed the roms available for the note.
Ocing this phone will not benefit me in ANY way whatsoever. Already score 3800-4200 in quadrant on this rom. Have full premium suite. Run ANY game at a rate that is super smooth. Get enough battery life to have 4.5 h of screen on with 24h unplugged.
Pray tell, how the hell will official ics help me? It won't.
Quit trying to sound cool and say "oh but ocing!" "oh but this or that!"
Fact is, with current roms the note is hitting close to its maximum potential and there isn't much else to improve.
Actually flash what's currently available before you comment on what the note "will be". It's not going to get much better.
Sent from my Galaxy Note SGH-I717 running Team Perfection's ICS Objection RC3 ROM.
mottyengel said:
its true, the official update is useless to me. but when the official one comes out, so does the source. and with it comes better roms from devs but also, and more importantly to me.... OC kernal... i need that, i tried those ics roms that are out now, they're all great, but its too slow... If you ever download torrentz, you know what im talking about. If im running Adownloader to download a torrent, i cant watch a video at the same time at 1.5 ghz. but at 1.83, i can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have no idea what you're talking about. Try the rom in my sig. Please.
Sent from my Galaxy Note SGH-I717 running Team Perfection's ICS Objection RC3 ROM.
Err0xx said:
I don't give a piss about OCing. Anyone calling ics slow hasn't flashed the roms available for the note.
Ocing this phone will not benefit me in ANY way whatsoever. Already score 3800-4200 in quadrant on this rom. Have full premium suite. Run ANY game at a rate that is super smooth. Get enough battery life to have 4.5 h of screen on with 24h unplugged.
Pray tell, how the hell will official ics help me? It won't.
Quit trying to sound cool and say "oh but ocing!" "oh but this or that!"
Fact is, with current roms the note is hitting close to its maximum potential and there isn't much else to improve.
Actually flash what's currently available before you comment on what the note "will be". It's not going to get much better.
Sent from my Galaxy Note SGH-I717 running Team Perfection's ICS Objection RC3 ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a lot more you can do with a kernel besides overclocking after the source is released. It will benefit each of us. I say ICS is useless without the kernel source. It may be good now for the people that have updated to the ICS roms but it will be great after the scource is released. You can say what you but there will be no comparison to the roms now and the roms after getting the source even without overclocking. You must have no idea what your talking about or maybe your just not familiar with custom linux based kernels. The custom kernels is where its at.
porkenhimer said:
There is a lot more you can do with a kernel besides overclocking after the source is released. It will benefit each of us. I say ICS is useless without the kernel source. It may be good now for the people that have updated to the ICS roms but it will be great after the scource is released. You can say what you but there will be no comparison to the roms now and the roms after getting the source even without overclocking. You must have no idea what your talking about or maybe your just not familiar with custom linux based kernels. The custom kernels is where its at.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember this thread and come back to it and discuss with me what's changed.
Not much will.
You have no ****ing clue who my XDA identities are. Ill wager I know a damn lot more than you about Linux kernels.
With the current rom features, things can marginally improve but,for the most part, aren't going to change much.
Please keep this thread bookmarked and come back to it after ice source is out- I get a demented thrill when I say "I told you so."
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
Ha Ha
Sent from the Darkside of the Force
erick161 said:
Lies. A year ago my atrix sported a dual core T2, which I'm finding is quite superior to this scorpion crap we have.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. I came from an Atrix, with the exception of the random lags i get (thinking its Snapdragon related), this is a far superior phone to my Atrix. I absolutely love the size and feel and build quality.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
All I'll say is if you can't watch a video or play games without your phone stuttering, exchange it.
When I was on GB without OC no problems. And now that I'm on ICS, still no problems. My buddy's note is the same way.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
I have been trying out several different ICS ROMs on my phone for the last few months. Never had a GB custom ROM. I was on stock UCKK6 which came with my phone and then went on to the ICS roms.
I have tried almost all of the SGH-i777 custom ROMS - and MIUI as well.
Out of curiosity I decided to go back to Gingerbread so flashed UnOriginal ROM.
First thing I noticed - Damn this is smooth. Everything - browser, launcher, touch response - everything is smooth like a baby's butt.
So whats going on with ICS? why dont we have the same smooth experience on any of the ICS roms. Is it because the official source code has not been released yet? or is it resource heavy compared to GB?
Do not want to start a ROM comparison but just curious. Having moved back to GB I am not sure I am missing anything critical from ICS. Others might not share this opinion but this is what it is for me and the things I use my phone for.
I am still bitten by the flash bug - so will continue to try out the ICS ROMs.
What do all of you think about moving back to GB and the pros/cons? What ICS feature will you miss the most? Please share your thoughts!
<puts flame suit on>
I'm about ready to go that route myself... Becoming frustrated when I find a "perfect" ROM, only to have the wlan_rx wakelock come back and drain my battery into nothingness. My favorite GB is Shishir's - Fairly stock, but with some nice tweakability, and have never run into the same battery probs.
Tophaholic said:
What do all of you think about moving back to GB and the pros/cons? What ICS feature will you miss the most? Please share your thoughts!
<puts flame suit on>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a personal choice.
In here, in this world, whole universe, no one forces you to do what you don't want to.
Once in a while, I still heard some people saying "Windows 3.1 is so much better than Windows 7".
It is purely your choice so no need to put the flame on.
It's good that seeing you in fact trying out a few different ROMs and finally made the decision on your own.
That's a good sign for all of us.
I've had the same experience as well. I'm not so sure if it's issues with the roms but more with the Kernels. There is a lot involved to tune the kernels just right. I'm no developer but I believe ICS may just be a little more complex this GB.... or at lease ICS is not so forgiving.... I'm not developer so who knows.
On a side note, I just tried the PARANOIDANDROID v1.1 port so far this has been on the same level as smoothness as any GB rom I've ran. Link below:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1660974
I even found a port for my SGS Captivate and wow.... its 10x better then the GB rom. So this rom has something going on that I'm going to keep testing out. You may want to give it a try as well.
Im still on unnamed and ics has a few system changes like scrolling and touch screen responsiveness that make it how it is
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
nappent said:
I've had the same experience as well. I'm not so sure if it's issues with the roms but more with the Kernels. There is a lot involved to tune the kernels just right. I'm no developer but I believe ICS may just be a little more complex this GB.... or at lease ICS is not so forgiving.... I'm not developer so who knows.
On a side note, I just tried the PARANOIDANDROID v1.1 port so far this has been on the same level as smoothness as any GB rom I've ran. Link below:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1660974
I even found a port for my SGS Captivate and wow.... its 10x better then the GB rom. So this rom has something going on that I'm going to keep testing out. You may want to give it a try as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive been running paranoidandroid since pre 1.0. its been my daily driver for sure. its ridiculously smooth and stable.
In case you haven't tried this combo already, I've found tasks aokp combined with the fluxi kernel to be the smoothest thing I've ever run. And yes, I've run many gb roms. Bought this phone the day it was released. Unnamed is an awesome rom, but I'm in love with this combo
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
LongDuckDong said:
In case you haven't tried this combo already, I've found tasks aokp combined with the fluxi kernel to be the smoothest thing I've ever run. And yes, I've run many gb roms. Bought this phone the day it was released. Unnamed is an awesome rom, but I'm in love with this combo
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I've been running AOKP/Fluxi combo since I decided to jump into the world of ICS ROMs, and it's the best one I've used so far. I will definitely agree about the smoothness of UnNamed, though. I've got a backup saved just in case
LongDuckDong said:
In case you haven't tried this combo already, I've found tasks aokp combined with the fluxi kernel to be the smoothest thing I've ever run. And yes, I've run many gb roms. Bought this phone the day it was released. Unnamed is an awesome rom, but I'm in love with this combo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried AOKP with Siyah and Neak but not with Fluxi. I will give it a shot.
Of all the ICS ROMs I have tried - I thought Shishir ICS and Serendipity 9 were the smoothest - however that might be partly due to the SGS3 launcher.
polobreaka said:
ive been running paranoidandroid since pre 1.0. its been my daily driver for sure. its ridiculously smooth and stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need to give this ROM a shot as well. Looks pretty interesting.
GB > ICS.
Sent from my Galaxy S2
Binnacle is also damn smooth. That was my personal favorite GB rom.
Every time I flash an ICS rom, I immediately go running back to GB. Maybe it's just me being impatient and not letting things "settle in", but most ICS roms I've tried aren't as quick and smooth, and that just gives me an anxiety attack
Red5 said:
Binnacle is also damn smooth. That was my personal favorite GB rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had not even heard of this one. But saw LilChris's index post and found it. I will definitely try this one. A ROM that PirateGhost and Red5 worked on - has to be great
It shows Beta7 as the latest version. Is this stable enough to be a daily driver?
Binnacle is hands down the best gb rom for this phone. It is wicked fast and epic battery life. Its more than enough for a dd
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
The only thing that doesn't work on Binnacle is the strippers. Pirate took them out of the last beta build, said they were too "lulzactive" for him.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
MikeyMikes Serendipity 9 is the smoothest thing I've run. Especially with the stock Sammy launcher available during Aroma install.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
33t said:
MikeyMikes Serendipity 9 is the smoothest thing I've run. Especially with the stock Sammy launcher available during Aroma install.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. The new Touchwiz UX is really smooth. Trebuchet does not feel as smooth on the same ROM
yoderk said:
Binnacle is hands down the best gb rom for this phone. It is wicked fast and epic battery life. Its more than enough for a dd
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did try Binnacle Beta 7 yesterday. I did not realize it had android 2.3.6. I somehow like the bounce effect in 2.3.4 that the UnOriginal ROM offers. Hate the glow effect in 2.3.6. Also, personally I felt UnOriginal was smoother than Binnacle (no offense) - just my opinion.
I did not leave it on long enough to comment about battery life. I flashed a different ROM. Seems like I am turning into a Flashaholic (need to restrain)
My progression:
Unnamed, then MIUI then CM7 then CM9. Doubt I'll ever leave CM9.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Hi,
my wife uses her Atrix 4G and likes it very much. I put the Nottachtrix ROM on it about a year ago. It is still 2.3 based, so I was thinking about to get her a stable 4.x ROM. What is your advice? Which ROM shall I go for. Stability is the king. Nothing else really matters. She is not a tweaker, nor gamer.
Thanks.
kobak.org said:
Hi,
my wife uses her Atrix 4G and likes it very much. I put the Nottachtrix ROM on it about a year ago. It is still 2.3 based, so I was thinking about to get her a stable 4.x ROM. What is your advice? Which ROM shall I go for. Stability is the king. Nothing else really matters. She is not a tweaker, nor gamer.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want stability, stay on a GB based ROM. Any ICS (4.0.x) or JB (4.1.x-4.2.x) ROMs are semi stable, but have their drawbacks. The biggest problem with stability was the kernel. Now with a compatible kernel, we're getting somewhere, but we still have a long way to go before its at the point where it can be a daily driver.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
palmbeach05 said:
If you want stability, stay on a GB based ROM. Any ICS (4.0.x) or JB (4.1.x-4.2.x) ROMs are semi stable, but have their drawbacks. The biggest problem with stability was the kernel. Now with a compatible kernel, we're getting somewhere, but we still have a long way to go before its at the point where it can be a daily driver.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks and sad to hear that. Let's hope it will be better soon.
kobak.org said:
Thanks and sad to hear that. Let's hope it will be better soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a work in progress, the public alpha just got released on the 19th. Main issues are battery life, overheating, random reboots, camera, and on blur based ICS ROMs, bluetooth and home button. Also, screen tearing seems to be an issue for some devices.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app