Will a samsung rom or an aosp rom give me more battery and performance? I was thinking of miui or checkrom revoHd v6. Also which kernel is the best?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
samsung put some bloatware in their rom so generally an AOSP rom should achieve a better battery life
Bettery life also depends on how you are using your phone and many other factors . You can try those ROM and kernel out by your own to determin which suits you best
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
nekoworkshop said:
samsung put some bloatware in their rom so generally an AOSP rom should achieve better life
Bettery life also depends on how you are using your phone and many other factors . You can try those ROM and kernel out by your own to determin which suits you best
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So ill install MIUI and check
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
srivas95 said:
Will a samsung rom or an aosp rom give me more battery and performance? I was thinking of miui or checkrom revoHd v6. Also which kernel is the best?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As said earlier it depends on the usage.. Some good ROMs are CheckRom(use siyah or speedmod kernal) , CM7. 1
If you want ics, try cm9.. I'm getting a great battery backup.. Try cm9 with lpb modem..
Thank me if I helped
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
There's so many variables between phones "users" that there is no better...
Flash backup try ROM/Modem/kernel combos.
Thread closed.
Sent from the valley of the shadows....
Related
Hey Guys,
I wanted to know which is the best custom rom for Samsung Galaxy S2 currently with all the features and the best battery life. I saw many roms but was unable to decide to go for which rom. Thanks in advance for the same.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
my favorite WAJKIUI ROM .... fast, and better battery
Agree with above plus if you add setcpu you can get amazing battery life.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
check rom with siyah kernel 2.3 ,very fast medium battery life...if you want better battery life get sensation rom by crysis with siyah 2.1
I am always on internet due to which the battery life of my Samsung GalaxyS2 is very poor. If i install a custom rom which has a better battery life will be very good.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
sam180881 said:
Hey Guys,
I wanted to know which is the best custom rom for Samsung Galaxy S2 currently with all the features and the best battery life. I saw many roms but was unable to decide to go for which rom. Thanks in advance for the same.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
er.....mmm..... your in the wrong place mate. wrong thread :-/
What is the most time you received from your battery?
Read the development forums and try one until you get something you like.
Thread closed.
hello. sorry for spaming..but i cant find something interesting..
in want a stable fast and good performancing rom. must be smoother than butter
can you say me a rom which is samsung ics based ?
I use WanamLite, but also liked VK rom. Might also want to take a look at FoxHound. All are Samsung-based ICS roms. My preference is WanamLite though...smooth and food battery life with no bugs.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
jonas9 said:
hello. sorry for spaming..but i cant find something interesting..
in want a stable fast and good performancing rom. must be smoother than butter
can you say me a rom which is samsung ics based ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try RootBOX. Super fast, excellent battery, excellent support.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
kilometers4 said:
Try RootBOX. Super fast, excellent battery, excellent support.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rootbox is based on 4.0.4 AOKP, not Samsung as requested in OP
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
sefrcoko said:
Rootbox is based on 4.0.4 AOKP, not Samsung as requested in OP
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah sorry, must be going crazy today. Well maybe you can dual boot with it using siyah kernel
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Just try the ROMs yourself. Asking for best ROM or for ROM suggestions is against the rules because nobody can answer the question for you.
Closed
which is the best ICS ROM for battery life?
can anyone suggest me.thanks.
Any ROMs that are based on Samsung firmware
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
adilliano said:
which is the best ICS ROM for battery life?
can anyone suggest me.thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look at my thread => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=26775950
I have tested the stock kernels on the corresponding stock ROMs.
For me ... on my phone with my normal usage (which is "light"), XWLPD has best battery life.
Depending on some settings, which I found here => http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=16973603
The one you test yourself.
MistahBungle said:
The one you test yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1. They are different for each device
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium
Although that is a vague and discouraged question in XDA (see http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1612881), I'll bite.
I'm using the stock XWLPG firmware with Siyah kernel (default settings) and am getting around 5.5h screen-on time with heavy usage. That's considered good to me. My advice is to just go with a stock rom with Siyah/Speedmod kernel.
Just test out different roms and see what you like
Sorry man. You need to decide what's the best for you. Also you should have read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1612881
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Trying them yourself is the only way to go.
Closed
Hi folks
Can someone tell me whats the best rom and the best kernel for battery life?
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
-Luigi. said:
Hi folks
Can someone tell me whats the best rom and the best kernel for battery life?
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rootbox 3.1 and dorimanx 7.10
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
kilometers4 said:
Rootbox 3.1 and dorimanx 7.10
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I"ll try them out
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Siyah 4.1.5. and Neatrom lite works for me.
Speedmod latest GB kernel (I think it's k2-21) + checkrom v6. It's a GB though
Sent with a homing pigeon
Try this one, you'll get the best battery life anyone on here has ever had. I promise.
I use dorimanx kernel 7.11 + slimbean 2.8
In my case the battery lasts longer and it's stable and heavily customizable :good:
kilometers4 said:
Rootbox 3.1 and dorimanx 7.10
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
boki9999 said:
Siyah 4.1.5. and Neatrom lite works for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
riro1612 said:
Speedmod latest GB kernel (I think it's k2-21) + checkrom v6. It's a GB though
Sent with a homing pigeon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maulattu said:
I use dorimanx kernel 7.11 + slimbean 2.8
In my case the battery lasts longer and it's stable and heavily customizable :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems all of them are the best. Gonna flash them all together.
The absolute best battery you can get is with Kernels that have MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled.Trust me. It might take you a while to find one but when you do, woah. Be sure to do a few data wipes after you've flashed the said kernel to get the most optimal battery life. I promise you it works, I did that and haven't needed to charge my phone for over a month now.
postfatal said:
The absolute best battery you can get is with Kernels that have MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled.Trust me. It might take you a while to find one but when you do, woah. Be sure to do a few data wipes after you've flashed the said kernel to get the most optimal battery life. I promise you it works, I did that and haven't needed to charge my phone for over a month now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice finding mate..
I would love to encourage Samsung to install this lovely kernel to all it's android line-up so we all can get benefit of life time battery life
Hi Guys,
I'm a new member so I cannot post in the Development Thread of the Super Nexus 2.0 ROM for the Galaxy S2 GT - I9100.
Galaxy S2's battery life is horrible as experienced by most people and I am no exception. So I was looking for a Good ROM with best battery life.
My search ended with Super Nexus 2.0 ROM. Its a very good and stable ROM. But its been almost a month since i installed the ROM but the battery life is almost the same as the Stock ROM. Tried some battery saver apps, but not satisfied. I would not like to change the ROM as its brilliant expect the battery life. So thinking of changing the kernel (Never done that before), so what do you guys think which Kernel is the best for Super Nexus 2.0 ROM and Battery Life.
Thanks.
postfatal said:
The absolute best battery you can get is with Kernels that have MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled.Trust me. It might take you a while to find one but when you do, woah. Be sure to do a few data wipes after you've flashed the said kernel to get the most optimal battery life. I promise you it works, I did that and haven't needed to charge my phone for over a month now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that sound nice......phils kernel has't activated that right ?
going to follow this batterylife-optimizing guide and wondering, why he dont metion that "MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled"-thing
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1909996
also I heared it could be dangereous to enable that....that confuses me a little bit
Hey there guyz,just wondering,does JB consume the most battery life between ICS and GB?Is it because of its performance?Do u recommend people in XDA to choose GB roms for great battery life and JB roms for extreme performance?Pls guyz,give your opinions Thank you :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I think you must try to make your personal opinion my opinion is that i dont care how much it consumes because screen is no 1 in consumption
Send from my SGS2 I9100 with HassanROM and latest DorimanX 8.xx kernel
The rule on the Galaxy S2 forum is that you are not allowed to ask which ROM's are better, which is basically what your thread is asking. This is not allowed as everyone's opinion of a ROM is different, and what performs well for one person may not perform well for you. You must try these ROM's yourself, with different kernels for better performance and battery life to find the optimum setup for you. Sorry but that's the way it is.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1612881
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
themadba said:
The rule on the Galaxy S2 forum is that you are not allowed to ask which ROM's are better, which is basically what your thread is asking. This is not allowed as everyone's opinion of a ROM is different, and what performs well for one person may not perform well for you. You must try these ROM's yourself, with different kernels for better performance and battery life to find the optimum setup for you. Sorry but that's the way it is.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1612881
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude. Really?? He is not asking which custom rom is better. He is asking for opinion about GB ICS or JB. Those are not developed by devs here. Being nice is a good habit.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 06:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------
Titan9119 said:
Hey there guyz,just wondering,does JB consume the most battery life between ICS and GB?Is it because of its performance?Do u recommend people in XDA to choose GB roms for great battery life and JB roms for extreme performance?Pls guyz,give your opinions Thank you :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually if you ask for consumption. I think ics is way more superior in saving battery than JB. There are so many reasons for that. Check the change log on wikipedia you ll come to know. Screen causes more drain on JB. Im also agree with the person who first answered your question.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Ohh great Which means that GB consumes the least battery life right?In your opinion,do u really look into performance than in battery life
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Titan9119 said:
Hey there guyz,just wondering,does JB consume the most battery life between ICS and GB?Is it because of its performance?Do u recommend people in XDA to choose GB roms for great battery life and JB roms for extreme performance?Pls guyz,give your opinions Thank you :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've personally noticed I can't get as good battery life with JB as with ICS. I use the same settings, and the same apps, but ICS seems better for me.
On the other hand: some people got great battery life with JB, so I also would recommend to try both versions to compare. Performance-wise (and the wonderfull features), JB is the best
Our official jb came with the biggest battery drainer .
Is the media scanner .
On gb or ics we didn't came across this bug cause it could be fixed .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Christian Nothing said:
Our official jb came with the biggest battery drainer .
Is the media scanner .
On gb or ics we didn't came across this bug cause it could be fixed .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never got problems with the media scanner
Here's a question:Back in ICS XWLS8,its firmware was 717MB and its battery was superb.But now in most rom in ICS and JB,its 300MB+ and battery is .With a huge amount of 400MB difference,how does the battery resist for long hours?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I'm on JellyBam 7.8.0,Android 4.2.2 JB,and I can get up to 2 days of battery.(My WI-FI is nearly always on,and I use it for games,like Plants vs Zombies.So I could say battery is pretty good,through I think back in October,(when I got my phone,It was on ICS 4.0.3),the battery was a bit better.But still...not bad
Mine sucks with wifi on, I gotta get into that asap.
Sent from the little guy
Yeah,so GB is considered to consume the least battery while JB consume a bit more battery than ICS.I guess sticking to ICS is rather fine for me
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
For me it stay for 6 hours intensive use playing games and wifi on
And 1-5 day for daily use
Send from my SGS2 I9100 with PACMAN ROM v22.2 and DorimanX 9.20 kernel
But curious though,how can ICS(XWLS8)weigh 717MB consume lesser battery than ICS and JB Rom which weigh 300+MB?Isn't it suppose to be the other way round?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Not necessarily, all stock ROM uses about the same partition space storaged.
Sent from the little guy
gastonw said:
Not necessarily, all stock ROM uses about the same partition space storaged.
Sent from the little guy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the battery life is just difference because of tweaks and changing the inside of a rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Aren't we talking stock here?
Sent from the little guy
Titan9119 said:
But the battery life is just difference because of tweaks and changing the inside of a rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense why battery in every rom is decreased a bit and its performance is great
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium